We Keep Coding

How To Stop API Request From Looping In The Network Tab [duplicate]

I've been playing around with the new hook system in React 16.7-alpha and get stuck in an infinite loop in useEffect when the state I'm handling is an object or array.
First, I use useState and initiate it with an empty object like this:
const [obj, setObj] = useState({});
Then, in useEffect, I use setObj to set it to an empty object again. As a second argument I'm passing [obj], hoping that it wont update if the content of the object hasn't changed. But it keeps updating. I guess because no matter the content, these are always different objects making React thinking it keep changing?
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients]);
The same is true with arrays, but as a primitive it wont get stuck in a loop, as expected.
Using these new hooks, how should I handle objects and array when checking weather the content has changed or not?

Passing an empty array as the second argument to useEffect makes it only run on mount and unmount, thus stopping any infinite loops.
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, []);
This was clarified to me in the blog post on React hooks at https://www.robinwieruch.de/react-hooks/

Had the same problem. I don't know why they not mention this in docs. Just want to add a little to Tobias Haugen answer.
To run in every component/parent rerender you need to use:
useEffect(() => {
// don't know where it can be used :/
})
To run anything only one time after component mount(will be rendered once) you need to use:
useEffect(() => {
// do anything only one time if you pass empty array []
// keep in mind, that component will be rendered one time (with default values) before we get here
}, [] )
To run anything one time on component mount and on data/data2 change:
const [data, setData] = useState(false)
const [data2, setData2] = useState('default value for first render')
useEffect(() => {
// if you pass some variable, than component will rerender after component mount one time and second time if this(in my case data or data2) is changed
// if your data is object and you want to trigger this when property of object changed, clone object like this let clone = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(data)), change it clone.prop = 2 and setData(clone).
// if you do like this 'data.prop=2' without cloning useEffect will not be triggered, because link to data object in momory doesn't changed, even if object changed (as i understand this)
}, [data, data2] )
How i use it most of the time:
export default function Book({id}) {
const [book, bookSet] = useState(false)
const loadBookFromServer = useCallback(async () => {
let response = await fetch('api/book/' + id)
response = await response.json()
bookSet(response)
}, [id]) // every time id changed, new book will be loaded
useEffect(() => {
loadBookFromServer()
}, [loadBookFromServer]) // useEffect will run once and when id changes
if (!book) return false //first render, when useEffect did't triggered yet we will return false
return <div>{JSON.stringify(book)}</div>
}

I ran into the same problem too once and I fixed it by making sure I pass primitive values in the second argument [].
If you pass an object, React will store only the reference to the object and run the effect when the reference changes, which is usually every singe time (I don't now how though).
The solution is to pass the values in the object. You can try,
const obj = { keyA: 'a', keyB: 'b' }
useEffect(() => {
// do something
}, [Object.values(obj)]);
or
const obj = { keyA: 'a', keyB: 'b' }
useEffect(() => {
// do something
}, [obj.keyA, obj.keyB]);

If you are building a custom hook, you can sometimes cause an infinite loop with default as follows
function useMyBadHook(values = {}) {
useEffect(()=> {
/* This runs every render, if values is undefined */
},
[values]
)
}
The fix is to use the same object instead of creating a new one on every function call:
const defaultValues = {};
function useMyBadHook(values = defaultValues) {
useEffect(()=> {
/* This runs on first call and when values change */
},
[values]
)
}
If you are encountering this in your component code the loop may get fixed if you use defaultProps instead of ES6 default values
function MyComponent({values}) {
useEffect(()=> {
/* do stuff*/
},[values]
)
return null; /* stuff */
}
MyComponent.defaultProps = {
values = {}
}

Your infinite loop is due to circularity
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients]);
setIngredients({}); will change the value of ingredients(will return a new reference each time), which will run setIngredients({}). To solve this you can use either approach:
Pass a different second argument to useEffect
const timeToChangeIngrediants = .....
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [timeToChangeIngrediants ]);
setIngrediants will run when timeToChangeIngrediants has changed.
I'm not sure what use case justifies change ingrediants once it has been changed. But if it is the case, you pass Object.values(ingrediants) as a second argument to useEffect.
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, Object.values(ingrediants));

As said in the documentation (https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-effect.html), the useEffect hook is meant to be used when you want some code to be executed after every render. From the docs:
Does useEffect run after every render? Yes!
If you want to customize this, you can follow the instructions that appear later in the same page (https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-effect.html#tip-optimizing-performance-by-skipping-effects). Basically, the useEffect method accepts a second argument, that React will examine to determine if the effect has to be triggered again or not.
useEffect(() => {
document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
}, [count]); // Only re-run the effect if count changes
You can pass any object as the second argument. If this object remains unchanged, your effect will only be triggered after the first mount. If the object changes, the effect will be triggered again.

I'm not sure if this will work for you but you could try adding .length like this:
useEffect(() => {
// fetch from server and set as obj
}, [obj.length]);
In my case (I was fetching an array!) it fetched data on mount, then again only on change and it didn't go into a loop.

If you include empty array at the end of useEffect:
useEffect(()=>{
setText(text);
},[])
It would run once.
If you include also parameter on array:
useEffect(()=>{
setText(text);
},[text])
It would run whenever text parameter change.

I often run into an infinite re-render when having a complex object as state and updating it from useRef:
const [ingredients, setIngredients] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({
...ingredients,
newIngedient: { ... }
});
}, [ingredients]);
In this case eslint(react-hooks/exhaustive-deps) forces me (correctly) to add ingredients to the dependency array. However, this results in an infinite re-render. Unlike what some say in this thread, this is correct, and you can't get away with putting ingredients.someKey or ingredients.length into the dependency array.
The solution is that setters provide the old value that you can refer to. You should use this, rather than referring to ingredients directly:
const [ingredients, setIngredients] = useState({});
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients(oldIngedients => {
return {
...oldIngedients,
newIngedient: { ... }
}
});
}, []);

If you use this optimization, make sure the array includes all values from the component scope (such as props and state) that change over time and that are used by the effect.
I believe they are trying to express the possibility that one could be using stale data, and to be aware of this. It doesn't matter the type of values we send in the array for the second argument as long as we know that if any of those values change it will execute the effect. If we are using ingredients as part of the computation within the effect, we should include it in the array.
const [ingredients, setIngredients] = useState({});
// This will be an infinite loop, because by shallow comparison ingredients !== {}
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients]);
// If we need to update ingredients then we need to manually confirm
// that it is actually different by deep comparison.
useEffect(() => {
if (is(<similar_object>, ingredients) {
return;
}
setIngredients(<similar_object>);
}, [ingredients]);

The main problem is that useEffect compares the incoming value with the current value shallowly. This means that these two values compared using '===' comparison which only checks for object references and although array and object values are the same it treats them to be two different objects. I recommend you to check out my article about useEffect as a lifecycle methods.

The best way is to compare previous value with current value by using usePrevious() and _.isEqual() from Lodash.
Import isEqual and useRef. Compare your previous value with current value inside the useEffect(). If they are same do nothing else update. usePrevious(value) is a custom hook which create a ref with useRef().
Below is snippet of my code. I was facing problem of infinite loop with updating data using firebase hook
import React, { useState, useEffect, useRef } from 'react'
import 'firebase/database'
import { Redirect } from 'react-router-dom'
import { isEqual } from 'lodash'
import {
useUserStatistics
} from '../../hooks/firebase-hooks'
export function TMDPage({ match, history, location }) {
const usePrevious = value => {
const ref = useRef()
useEffect(() => {
ref.current = value
})
return ref.current
}
const userId = match.params ? match.params.id : ''
const teamId = location.state ? location.state.teamId : ''
const [userStatistics] = useUserStatistics(userId, teamId)
const previousUserStatistics = usePrevious(userStatistics)
useEffect(() => {
if (
!isEqual(userStatistics, previousUserStatistics)
) {
doSomething()
}
})

In case you DO need to compare the object and when it is updated here is a deepCompare hook for comparison. The accepted answer surely does not address that. Having an [] array is suitable if you need the effect to run only once when mounted.
Also, other voted answers only address a check for primitive types by doing obj.value or something similar to first get to the level where it is not nested. This may not be the best case for deeply nested objects.
So here is one that will work in all cases.
import { DependencyList } from "react";
const useDeepCompare = (
value: DependencyList | undefined
): DependencyList | undefined => {
const ref = useRef<DependencyList | undefined>();
if (!isEqual(ref.current, value)) {
ref.current = value;
}
return ref.current;
};
You can use the same in useEffect hook
React.useEffect(() => {
setState(state);
}, useDeepCompare([state]));

You could also destructure the object in the dependency array, meaning the state would only update when certain parts of the object updated.
For the sake of this example, let's say the ingredients contained carrots, we could pass that to the dependency, and only if carrots changed, would the state update.
You could then take this further and only update the number of carrots at certain points, thus controlling when the state would update and avoiding an infinite loop.
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients({});
}, [ingredients.carrots]);
An example of when something like this could be used is when a user logs into a website. When they log in, we could destructure the user object to extract their cookie and permission role, and update the state of the app accordingly.

my Case was special on encountering an infinite loop, the senario was like this:
I had an Object, lets say objX that comes from props and i was destructuring it in props like:
const { something: { somePropery } } = ObjX
and i used the somePropery as a dependency to my useEffect like:
useEffect(() => {
// ...
}, [somePropery])
and it caused me an infinite loop, i tried to handle this by passing the whole something as a dependency and it worked properly.

Another worked solution that I used for arrays state is:
useEffect(() => {
setIngredients(ingredients.length ? ingredients : null);
}, [ingredients]);

Is it correct to use two different useState hook to store an array and a filtered array for passing to components?

I am currently porting my Pokemon project to React as I just learned the basics of React just a couple of weeks ago and want to see how well I can adapt it. Right now, the way I have my code architectured is to use two different useState hooks, one for the original array fetched from the PokeAPI and is only set once. This original array is also passed into my form object, which filters it according to a few form elements such as a Pokemon type or the Pokemon's name. And another useState hook is used to keep track of the filteredList which is what gets rendered to the website using the Array.map() function.
const [pokemonList, setPokemonList] = useState([]);
const [filteredList, setPokemonFilteredList] = useState([]);
Here's the useEffect() hook where we fetch and set the states
useEffect(() => {
const getPokemon = async () => {
const list = await fetchPokemon();
setPokemonList(list);
setPokemonFilteredList(list);
};
And finally the pokemonList state variable and setPokemonFilteredList methods get passed into the <PokemonSearchForm>
<PokemonSearchForm pokemonList={pokemonList} setPokemonList={setPokemonFilteredList} />
So as my question title suggests, is the way I use two different useState() 'correct'? Maybe a different way is for the child component to access pokemonList variable? But I believe this may be an anti-pattern.

It is better practice to not maintain duplicate or, in this case, derived state because you may run into divergence. For example, if your original pokemon data got updated, how would you make sure your filtered data got updated and then the filters re-applied? It gets hairy very fast.
The preferred alternative is to maintain the original data and filters in state and then compute the derived state (in this case, filter the list) during render.
function App() {
const [pokemonList, setPokemonList] = useState([]);
// Some default filter state
const [filters, setFilters] = useState({
types: ["any"],
search: ""
});
const filteredList = pokemonList.filter((pokemon) => {
// Filter logic here
});
return <PokemonSearchForm setFilters={setFilters} />
}

I would refactor this in a few different ways:
Keep the filter state in your parent component, the child component will simply notify it when those change.
Ditch the useState for useMemo which computes a value every time its dependencies change.
function YourComponent() {
const [filters, setFilters] = useState({});
const [pokemons, setPokemons] = useState([]);
useEffect(
() => {
const list = await fetchPokemon();
setPokemons(list);
},
[]
);
// This will run each time `filters` or `pokemons` change.
const filteredPokemons = useMemo(
() => {
return pokemons.filter((pokemon) => {
// Perform any filtering logic you may have,
// based on the filters set by the child component.
if (filters.name) {
return pokemon.name.includes(filters.name);
}
// etc...
});
},
[filters, pokemons]
);
return (
<PokemonSearchForm
pokemons={filteredPokemons}
onChange={setFilters}
/>
);
}

Mystery Parameter in setState, why does it work?

Going through a TypeScript + React course and building a todo list. My question is about a react feature though.
In the handler for adding a Todo, there is this function declared in setState
const App: React.FC= () => {
const [todos, setTodos] = useState<Todo[]>([])
const todoAddHandler = (text: string) => {
// when its called.... where does the prevTodos state come from?
setTodos(prevTodos => [...prevTodos,
{id: Math.random().toString(), text: text}])
}
return (
<div className="App">
<NewTodo onAddTodo={todoAddHandler}/>
<TodoList items={todos}></TodoList>
</div>
);
}
export default App;
When the function is called in setState, it automatically calls the current state with it. Is this just a feature of setState? That if you declare a function within it the parameter will always be the current state when the function is called?
Was very confused when this parameter just... worked. :#

TL;DR Is this just a feature of setState? - Yes
useState is a new way to use the exact same capabilities that this.state provides in a class
Meaning that its core still relies on old this.setState({}) functionality. If you remember using this.setState(), you will know that it has a callback function available, which can be used like this:
this.setState((currentState) => { /* do something with current state */ })
This has now been transfered to useState hook's second destructured item [item, setItem] setItem, thus it has the same capability:
setItem((currentState) => { /* do something with current state */ })
You can read more about it here

With hooks, React contains an internal mapping of each state name to its current value. With
const [todos, setTodos] = useState<Todo[]>([])
Whenever setTodos is called and todos state is set again, React will update the internal state for todos to the new value. It will also return the current internal state for a variable when useState is called.
You could think of it a bit like this:
// React internals
let internalState;
const setState = (param) => {
if (typeof param !== 'function') {
internalState = param;
} else {
param(internalState);
}
};
const useState = initialValue => {
internalState ??= initialValue;
return [internalState, setState];
}
Then, when you call the state setter, you can either pass it a plain value (updating internalState), or you can pass it a function that, when invoked, is passed the current internal state as the first parameter.
Note that the prevTodos parameter will contain the current state including intermediate updates. Eg, if you call setTodos twice synchronously before a re-render occurs, you'll need to use the callback form the second time in order to "see" the changes done by the first call of setTodos.

React: how can I force state to update in a functional component?

This function component has a template method that calls onChangeHandler, which accepts a select value and updates state. The problem is, state does not update until after the render method is called a second time, which means the value of selected option is one step ahead of the state value of selectedRouteName.
I know there are lifecycle methods in class components that I could use to force a state update, but I would like to keep this a function component, if possible.
As noted in the code, the logged state of selectedRouteDirection is one value behind the selected option. How can I force the state to update to the correct value in a functional component?
This question is not the same as similarly named question because my question asks about the actual implementation in my use case, not whether it is possible.
import React, { useState, Fragment, useEffect } from 'react';
const parser = require('xml-js');
const RouteSelect = props => {
const { routes } = props;
const [selectedRouteName, setRouteName] = useState('');
const [selectedRouteDirection, setRouteDirection] = useState('');
//console.log(routes);
const onChangeHandler = event => {
setRouteName({ name: event.target.value });
if(selectedRouteName.name) {
getRouteDirection();
}
}
/*
useEffect(() => {
if(selectedRouteName) {
getRouteDirection();
}
}); */
const getRouteDirection = () => {
const filteredRoute = routes.filter(route => route.Description._text === selectedRouteName.name);
const num = filteredRoute[0].Route._text;
let directions = [];
fetch(`https://svc.metrotransit.org/NexTrip/Directions/${num}`)
.then(response => {
return response.text();
}).then(response => {
return JSON.parse(parser.xml2json(response, {compact: true, spaces: 4}));
}).then(response => {
directions = response.ArrayOfTextValuePair.TextValuePair;
// console.log(directions);
setRouteDirection(directions);
})
.catch(error => {
console.log(error);
});
console.log(selectedRouteDirection); // This logged state is one value behind the selected option
}
const routeOptions = routes.map(route => <option key={route.Route._text}>{route.Description._text}</option>);
return (
<Fragment>
<select onChange={onChangeHandler}>
{routeOptions}
</select>
</Fragment>
);
};
export default RouteSelect;

Well, actually.. even though I still think effects are the right way to go.. your console.log is in the wrong place.. fetch is asynchronous and your console.log is right after the fetch instruction.
As #Bernardo states.. setState is also asynchronous
so at the time when your calling getRouteDirection();, selectedRouteName might still have the previous state.
So to make getRouteDirection(); trigger after the state was set.
You can use the effect and pass selectedRouteName as second parameter (Which is actually an optimization, so the effect only triggers if selectedRouteName has changed)
So this should do the trick:
useEffect(() => {
getRouteDirection();
}, [selectedRouteName]);
But tbh.. if you can provide a Stackblitz or similar, where you can reproduce the problem. We can definitely help you better.

setState is asynchronous! Many times React will look like it changes the state of your component in a synchronous way, but is not that way.

How can I force a component to re-render with hooks in React?

Considering below hooks example
import { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
Basically we use this.forceUpdate() method to force the component to re-render immediately in React class components like below example
class Test extends Component{
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.state = {
count:0,
count2: 100
}
this.setCount = this.setCount.bind(this);//how can I do this with hooks in functional component
}
setCount(){
let count = this.state.count;
count = count+1;
let count2 = this.state.count2;
count2 = count2+1;
this.setState({count});
this.forceUpdate();
//before below setState the component will re-render immediately when this.forceUpdate() is called
this.setState({count2: count
}
render(){
return (<div>
<span>Count: {this.state.count}></span>.
<button onClick={this.setCount}></button>
</div>
}
}
But my query is How can I force above functional component to re-render immediately with hooks?

This is possible with useState or useReducer, since useState uses useReducer internally:
const [, updateState] = React.useState();
const forceUpdate = React.useCallback(() => updateState({}), []);
forceUpdate isn't intended to be used under normal circumstances, only in testing or other outstanding cases. This situation may be addressed in a more conventional way.
setCount is an example of improperly used forceUpdate, setState is asynchronous for performance reasons and shouldn't be forced to be synchronous just because state updates weren't performed correctly. If a state relies on previously set state, this should be done with updater function,
If you need to set the state based on the previous state, read about the updater argument below.
<...>
Both state and props received by the updater function are guaranteed
to be up-to-date. The output of the updater is shallowly merged with
state.
setCount may not be an illustrative example because its purpose is unclear but this is the case for updater function:
setCount(){
this.setState(({count}) => ({ count: count + 1 }));
this.setState(({count2}) => ({ count2: count + 1 }));
this.setState(({count}) => ({ count2: count + 1 }));
}
This is translated 1:1 to hooks, with the exception that functions that are used as callbacks should better be memoized:
const [state, setState] = useState({ count: 0, count2: 100 });
const setCount = useCallback(() => {
setState(({count}) => ({ count: count + 1 }));
setState(({count2}) => ({ count2: count + 1 }));
setState(({count}) => ({ count2: count + 1 }));
}, []);

React Hooks FAQ official solution for forceUpdate:
const [_, forceUpdate] = useReducer((x) => x + 1, 0);
// usage
<button onClick={forceUpdate}>Force update</button>
Working example
const App = () => {
const [_, forceUpdate] = useReducer((x) => x + 1, 0);
return (
<div>
<button onClick={forceUpdate}>Force update</button>
<p>Forced update {_} times</p>
</div>
);
};
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.10.1/umd/react.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-vMEjoeSlzpWvres5mDlxmSKxx6jAmDNY4zCt712YCI0=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.10.1/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" integrity="sha256-QQt6MpTdAD0DiPLhqhzVyPs1flIdstR4/R7x4GqCvZ4=" crossorigin="anonymous"></script>
<script>var useReducer = React.useReducer</script>
<div id="root"></div>

Generally, you can use any state handling approach you want to trigger an update.
With TypeScript
codesandbox example
useState
const forceUpdate: () => void = React.useState({})[1].bind(null, {}) // see NOTE below
useReducer (recommended)
const forceUpdate = React.useReducer(() => ({}), {})[1] as () => void
as custom hook
Just wrap whatever approach you prefer like this
function useForceUpdate(): () => void {
return React.useReducer(() => ({}), {})[1] as () => void // <- paste here
}
How this works?
"To trigger an update" means to tell React engine that some value has changed and that it should rerender your component.
[, setState] from useState() requires a parameter. We get rid of it by binding a fresh object {}.
() => ({}) in useReducer is a dummy reducer that returns a fresh object each time an action is dispatched.
{} (fresh object) is required so that it triggers an update by changing a reference in the state.
PS: useState just wraps useReducer internally, so use reducer to reduce complexity. source
NOTE: Referential instability
Using .bind with useState causes a change in function reference between renders.
It is possible to wrap it inside useCallback as already explained in this answer here, but then it wouldn't be a sexy one-liner™. The Reducer version already keeps reference equality (stability) between renders. This is important if you want to pass the forceUpdate function in props to another component.
plain JS
const forceUpdate = React.useState({})[1].bind(null, {}) // see NOTE above
const forceUpdate = React.useReducer(() => ({}))[1]

As the others have mentioned, useState works - here is how mobx-react-lite implements updates - you could do something similar.
Define a new hook, useForceUpdate -
import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'
export function useForceUpdate() {
const [, setTick] = useState(0);
const update = useCallback(() => {
setTick(tick => tick + 1);
}, [])
return update;
}
and use it in a component -
const forceUpdate = useForceUpdate();
if (...) {
forceUpdate(); // force re-render
}
See https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx-react-lite/blob/master/src/utils.ts and https://github.com/mobxjs/mobx-react-lite/blob/master/src/useObserver.ts

Alternative to #MinhKha's answer:
It can be much cleaner with useReducer:
const [, forceUpdate] = useReducer(x => x + 1, 0);
Usage:
forceUpdate() - cleaner without params

You can simply define the useState like that:
const [, forceUpdate] = React.useState(0);
And usage: forceUpdate(n => !n)
Hope this help !

You should preferably only have your component depend on state and props and it will work as expected, but if you really need a function to force the component to re-render, you could use the useState hook and call the function when needed.
Example
const { useState, useEffect } = React;
function Foo() {
const [, forceUpdate] = useState();
useEffect(() => {
setTimeout(forceUpdate, 2000);
}, []);
return <div>{Date.now()}</div>;
}
ReactDOM.render(<Foo />, document.getElementById("root"));
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16.7.0-alpha.0/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>

Simple code
const forceUpdate = React.useReducer(bool => !bool)[1];
Use:
forceUpdate();

Potential option is to force update only on specific component using key. Updating the key trigger a rendering of the component (which failed to update before)
For example:
const [tableKey, setTableKey] = useState(1);
...
useEffect(() => {
...
setTableKey(tableKey + 1);
}, [tableData]);
...
<DataTable
key={tableKey}
data={tableData}/>

You can (ab)use normal hooks to force a rerender by taking advantage of the fact that React doesn't print booleans in JSX code
// create a hook
const [forceRerender, setForceRerender] = React.useState(true);
// ...put this line where you want to force a rerender
setForceRerender(!forceRerender);
// ...make sure that {forceRerender} is "visible" in your js code
// ({forceRerender} will not actually be visible since booleans are
// not printed, but updating its value will nonetheless force a
// rerender)
return (
<div>{forceRerender}</div>
)

One line solution:
const useForceUpdate = () => useState()[1];
useState returns a pair of values: the current state and a function that updates it - state and setter, here we are using only the setter in order to force re-render.

react-tidy has a custom hook just for doing that called useRefresh:
import React from 'react'
import {useRefresh} from 'react-tidy'
function App() {
const refresh = useRefresh()
return (
<p>
The time is {new Date()} <button onClick={refresh}>Refresh</button>
</p>
)
}
Learn more about this hook
Disclaimer I am the writer of this library.

My variation of forceUpdate is not via a counter but rather via an object:
// Emulates `forceUpdate()`
const [unusedState, setUnusedState] = useState()
const forceUpdate = useCallback(() => setUnusedState({}), [])
Because {} !== {} every time.

Solution in one single line:
const [,forceRender] = useReducer((s) => s+1, 0)
You can learn about useReducer here.
https://reactjs.org/docs/hooks-reference.html#usereducer

This will render depending components 3 times (arrays with equal elements aren't equal):
const [msg, setMsg] = useState([""])
setMsg(["test"])
setMsg(["test"])
setMsg(["test"])

const useForceRender = () => {
const [, forceRender] = useReducer(x => !x, true)
return forceRender
}
Usage
function Component () {
const forceRender = useForceRender()
useEffect(() => {
// ...
forceRender()
}, [])

For regular React Class based components, refer to React Docs for the forceUpdate api at this URL. The docs mention that:
Normally you should try to avoid all uses of forceUpdate() and only
read from this.props and this.state in render()
However, it is also mentioned in the docs that:
If your render() method depends on some other data, you can tell React
that the component needs re-rendering by calling forceUpdate().
So, although use cases for using forceUpdate might be rare, and I have not used it ever, however I have seen it used by other developers in some legacy corporate projects that I have worked on.
So, for the equivalent functionality for Functional Components, refer to the React Docs for HOOKS at this URL. Per the above URL, one can use the "useReducer" hook to provide a forceUpdate functionality for Functional Components.
A working code sample that does not use state or props is provided below, which is also available on CodeSandbox at this URL
import React, { useReducer, useRef } from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
import "./styles.css";
function App() {
// Use the useRef hook to store a mutable value inside a functional component for the counter
let countref = useRef(0);
const [, forceUpdate] = useReducer(x => x + 1, 0);
function handleClick() {
countref.current++;
console.log("Count = ", countref.current);
forceUpdate(); // If you comment this out, the date and count in the screen will not be updated
}
return (
<div className="App">
<h1> {new Date().toLocaleString()} </h1>
<h2>You clicked {countref.current} times</h2>
<button
onClick={() => {
handleClick();
}}
>
ClickToUpdateDateAndCount
</button>
</div>
);
}
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<App />, rootElement);
NOTE: An alternate approach using the useState hook (instead of useReducer) is also available at this URL.

There are many ways to force re-render in Hook.
For me simple way with useState() and tip of reference object values.
const [, forceRender] = useState({});
// Anywhre
forceRender({});
Codesandbox Example

A bit late to the party but I notice that most (all) of the answers have missed the part where you can pass a callback to forceUpdate lifecycle method.
As per the react source code, this callback has the same behavior as the one in the setState method - it is executed after the update.
Hence, the most correct implementation would be like this:
/**
* Increments the state which causes a rerender and executes a callback
* #param {function} callback - callback to execute after state update
* #returns {function}
*/
export const useForceUpdate = (callback) => {
const [state, updater] = useReducer((x) => x + 1, 0);
useEffect(() => {
callback && callback();
}, [state]);
return useCallback(() => {
updater();
}, []);
};

I was working with an array and spotted this issue. However, instead of explicit forceUpdate I found another approach - to deconstruct an array and set a new value for it using this code:
setRoutes(arr => [...arr, newRoute]); // add new elements to the array
setRouteErrors(routeErrs => [...routeErrs]); // the array elements were changed
I found it very interesting that setting even a copy of an array will not trigger the hook. I assume React does the shallow comparison