Related
Is there a way to return the difference between two arrays in JavaScript?
For example:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
// need ["c", "d"]
There is a better way using ES7:
Intersection
let intersection = arr1.filter(x => arr2.includes(x));
For [1,2,3] [2,3] it will yield [2,3]. On the other hand, for [1,2,3] [2,3,5] will return the same thing.
Difference
let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));
For [1,2,3] [2,3] it will yield [1]. On the other hand, for [1,2,3] [2,3,5] will return the same thing.
For a symmetric difference, you can do:
let difference = arr1
.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x))
.concat(arr2.filter(x => !arr1.includes(x)));
This way, you will get an array containing all the elements of arr1 that are not in arr2 and vice-versa
As #Joshaven Potter pointed out on his answer, you can add this to Array.prototype so it can be used like this:
Array.prototype.diff = function(arr2) { return this.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x)); }
[1, 2, 3].diff([2, 3])
Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
return this.filter(function(i) {return a.indexOf(i) < 0;});
};
//////////////
// Examples //
//////////////
const dif1 = [1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5] );
console.log(dif1); // => [1, 2, 6]
const dif2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4","test5","test6"].diff(["test1","test2","test3","test4"]);
console.log(dif2); // => ["test5", "test6"]
Note .indexOf() and .filter() are not available before IE9.
This answer was written in 2009, so it is a bit outdated, also it's rather educational for understanding the problem. Best solution I'd use today would be
let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));
(credits to other author here)
I assume you are comparing a normal array. If not, you need to change the for loop to a for .. in loop.
function arr_diff (a1, a2) {
var a = [], diff = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) {
a[a1[i]] = true;
}
for (var i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) {
if (a[a2[i]]) {
delete a[a2[i]];
} else {
a[a2[i]] = true;
}
}
for (var k in a) {
diff.push(k);
}
return diff;
}
console.log(arr_diff(['a', 'b'], ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']));
console.log(arr_diff("abcd", "abcde"));
console.log(arr_diff("zxc", "zxc"));
This is by far the easiest way to get exactly the result you are looking for, using jQuery:
var diff = $(old_array).not(new_array).get();
diff now contains what was in old_array that is not in new_array
The difference method in Underscore (or its drop-in replacement, Lo-Dash) can do this too:
(R)eturns the values from array that are not present in the other arrays
_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]);
=> [1, 3, 4]
As with any Underscore function, you could also use it in a more object-oriented style:
_([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]).difference([5, 2, 10]);
Plain JavaScript
There are two possible intepretations for "difference". I'll let you choose which one you want. Say you have:
var a1 = ['a', 'b' ];
var a2 = [ 'b', 'c'];
If you want to get ['a'], use this function:
function difference(a1, a2) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) {
if (a2.indexOf(a1[i]) === -1) {
result.push(a1[i]);
}
}
return result;
}
If you want to get ['a', 'c'] (all elements contained in either a1 or a2, but not both -- the so-called symmetric difference), use this function:
function symmetricDifference(a1, a2) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) {
if (a2.indexOf(a1[i]) === -1) {
result.push(a1[i]);
}
}
for (i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) {
if (a1.indexOf(a2[i]) === -1) {
result.push(a2[i]);
}
}
return result;
}
Lodash / Underscore
If you are using lodash, you can use _.difference(a1, a2) (case 1 above) or _.xor(a1, a2) (case 2).
If you are using Underscore.js, you can use the _.difference(a1, a2) function for case 1.
ES6 Set, for very large arrays
The code above works on all browsers. However, for large arrays of more than about 10,000 items, it becomes quite slow, because it has O(n²) complexity. On many modern browsers, we can take advantage of the ES6 Set object to speed things up. Lodash automatically uses Set when it's available. If you are not using lodash, use the following implementation, inspired by Axel Rauschmayer's blog post:
function difference(a1, a2) {
var a2Set = new Set(a2);
return a1.filter(function(x) { return !a2Set.has(x); });
}
function symmetricDifference(a1, a2) {
return difference(a1, a2).concat(difference(a2, a1));
}
Notes
The behavior for all examples may be surprising or non-obvious if you care about -0, +0, NaN or sparse arrays. (For most uses, this doesn't matter.)
A cleaner approach in ES6 is the following solution.
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
Difference
a2.filter(d => !a1.includes(d)) // gives ["c", "d"]
Intersection
a2.filter(d => a1.includes(d)) // gives ["a", "b"]
Disjunctive Union (Symmetric Difference)
[ ...a2.filter(d => !a1.includes(d)),
...a1.filter(d => !a2.includes(d)) ]
To get the symmetric difference you need to compare the arrays in both ways (or in all the ways in case of multiple arrays)
ES7 (ECMAScript 2016)
// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
return [
...a.filter(x => !b.includes(x)),
...b.filter(x => !a.includes(x))
];
}
// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff(...arrays) {
return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
const others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
return arr.filter(x => !unique.includes(x));
}));
}
ES6 (ECMAScript 2015)
// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
return [
...a.filter(x => b.indexOf(x) === -1),
...b.filter(x => a.indexOf(x) === -1)
];
}
// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff(...arrays) {
return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
const others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
return arr.filter(x => unique.indexOf(x) === -1);
}));
}
ES5 (ECMAScript 5.1)
// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var diff = [];
arrays.forEach(function(arr, i) {
var other = i === 1 ? a : b;
arr.forEach(function(x) {
if (other.indexOf(x) === -1) {
diff.push(x);
}
});
})
return diff;
}
// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff() {
var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var diff = [];
arrays.forEach(function(arr, i) {
var others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
var otherValues = Array.prototype.concat.apply([], others);
var unique = otherValues.filter(function (x, j) {
return otherValues.indexOf(x) === j;
});
diff = diff.concat(arr.filter(x => unique.indexOf(x) === -1));
});
return diff;
}
Example:
// diff between two arrays:
const a = ['a', 'd', 'e'];
const b = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a, b); // (3) ["e", "b", "c"]
// diff between multiple arrays
const a = ['b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'g'];
const b = ['a', 'b'];
const c = ['a', 'e', 'f'];
arrayDiff(a, b, c); // (4) ["c", "d", "g", "f"]
Difference between Arrays of Objects
function arrayDiffByKey(key, ...arrays) {
return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
const others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
return arr.filter( x =>
!unique.some(y => x[key] === y[key])
);
}));
}
Example:
const a = [{k:1}, {k:2}, {k:3}];
const b = [{k:1}, {k:4}, {k:5}, {k:6}];
const c = [{k:3}, {k:5}, {k:7}];
arrayDiffByKey('k', a, b, c); // (4) [{k:2}, {k:4}, {k:6}, {k:7}]
You could use a Set in this case. It is optimized for this kind of operation (union, intersection, difference).
Make sure it applies to your case, once it allows no duplicates.
var a = new JS.Set([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
var b = new JS.Set([2,4,6,8]);
a.difference(b)
// -> Set{1,3,5,7,9}
One Liners
const unique = (a) => [...new Set(a)];
const uniqueBy = (x,f)=>Object.values(x.reduce((a,b)=>((a[f(b)]=b),a),{}));
const intersection = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => b.includes(v));
const diff = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => !b.includes(v));
const symDiff = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(diff(b, a));
const union = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(b);
const a = unique([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]);
console.log(a);
const b = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8];
console.log(intersection(a, b), diff(a, b), symDiff(a, b), union(a, b));
console.log(uniqueBy(
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 2, name: "xyz" },
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
],
(v) => v.id
));
const intersectionBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => b.some((u) => f(v, u)));
console.log(intersectionBy(
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 2, name: "xyz" },
],
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 3, name: "pqr" },
],
(v, u) => v.id === u.id
));
const diffBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => !b.some((u) => f(v, u)));
console.log(diffBy(
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 2, name: "xyz" },
],
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 3, name: "pqr" },
],
(v, u) => v.id === u.id
));
TypeScript
playground link
const unique = <T>(array: T[]) => [...new Set(array)];
const intersection = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
array1.filter((v) => array2.includes(v));
const diff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
array1.filter((v) => !array2.includes(v));
const symDiff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
diff(array1, array2).concat(diff(array2, array1));
const union = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
diff(array1, array2).concat(array2);
const intersectionBy = <T>(
array1: T[],
array2: T[],
predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));
const diffBy = <T>(
array1: T[],
array2: T[],
predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => !array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));
const uniqueBy = <T>(
array: T[],
predicate: (v: T, i: number, a: T[]) => string
) =>
Object.values(
array.reduce((acc, value, index) => {
acc[predicate(value, index, array)] = value;
return acc;
}, {} as { [key: string]: T })
);
function diff(a1, a2) {
return a1.concat(a2).filter(function(val, index, arr){
return arr.indexOf(val) === arr.lastIndexOf(val);
});
}
Merge both the arrays, unique values will appear only once so indexOf() will be the same as lastIndexOf().
With the arrival of ES6 with sets and splat operator (at the time of being works only in Firefox, check compatibility table), you can write the following one liner:
var a = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
var b = ['a', 'b'];
var b1 = new Set(b);
var difference = [...new Set(a.filter(x => !b1.has(x)))];
which will result in [ "c", "d" ].
to subtract one array from another, simply use the snippet below:
var a1 = ['1','2','3','4','6'];
var a2 = ['3','4','5'];
var items = new Array();
items = jQuery.grep(a1,function (item) {
return jQuery.inArray(item, a2) < 0;
});
It will returns ['1,'2','6'] that are items of first array which don't exist in the second.
Therefore, according to your problem sample, following code is the exact solution:
var array1 = ["test1", "test2","test3", "test4"];
var array2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"];
var _array = new Array();
_array = jQuery.grep(array2, function (item) {
return jQuery.inArray(item, array1) < 0;
});
Another way to solve the problem
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.concat(arr2).filter(function (val) {
if (!(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)))
return val;
});
}
diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]); // return [7, 4, 5]
Also, you can use arrow function syntax:
const diffArray = (arr1, arr2) => arr1.concat(arr2)
.filter(val => !(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)));
diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]); // return [7, 4, 5]
Functional approach with ES2015
Computing the difference between two arrays is one of the Set operations. The term already indicates that the native Set type should be used, in order to increase the lookup speed. Anyway, there are three permutations when you compute the difference between two sets:
[+left difference] [-intersection] [-right difference]
[-left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
[+left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
Here is a functional solution that reflects these permutations.
Left difference:
// small, reusable auxiliary functions
const apply = f => x => f(x);
const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y);
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
// left difference
const differencel = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? false
: true
) (xs);
};
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
// run the computation
console.log( differencel(xs) (ys) );
Right difference:
differencer is trivial. It is just differencel with flipped arguments. You can write a function for convenience: const differencer = flip(differencel). That's all!
Symmetric difference:
Now that we have the left and right one, implementing the symmetric difference gets trivial as well:
// small, reusable auxiliary functions
const apply = f => x => f(x);
const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y);
const concat = y => xs => xs.concat(y);
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
// left difference
const differencel = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? false
: true
) (xs);
};
// symmetric difference
const difference = ys => xs =>
concat(differencel(xs) (ys)) (flip(differencel) (xs) (ys));
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
// run the computation
console.log( difference(xs) (ys) );
I guess this example is a good starting point to obtain an impression what functional programming means:
Programming with building blocks that can be plugged together in many different ways.
A solution using indexOf() will be ok for small arrays but as they grow in length the performance of the algorithm approaches O(n^2). Here's a solution that will perform better for very large arrays by using objects as associative arrays to store the array entries as keys; it also eliminates duplicate entries automatically but only works with string values (or values which can be safely stored as strings):
function arrayDiff(a1, a2) {
var o1={}, o2={}, diff=[], i, len, k;
for (i=0, len=a1.length; i<len; i++) { o1[a1[i]] = true; }
for (i=0, len=a2.length; i<len; i++) { o2[a2[i]] = true; }
for (k in o1) { if (!(k in o2)) { diff.push(k); } }
for (k in o2) { if (!(k in o1)) { diff.push(k); } }
return diff;
}
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a1, a2); // => ['c', 'd']
arrayDiff(a2, a1); // => ['c', 'd']
The above answer by Joshaven Potter is great. But it returns elements in array B that are not in array C, but not the other way around. For example, if var a=[1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5,7]); then it will output: ==> [1,2,6], but not [1,2,6,7], which is the actual difference between the two. You can still use Potter's code above but simply redo the comparison once backwards too:
Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
return this.filter(function(i) {return !(a.indexOf(i) > -1);});
};
////////////////////
// Examples
////////////////////
var a=[1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5,7]);
var b=[3,4,5,7].diff([1,2,3,4,5,6]);
var c=a.concat(b);
console.log(c);
This should output: [ 1, 2, 6, 7 ]
Very Simple Solution with the filter function of JavaScript:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = [];
var myArr = arr1.concat(arr2);
newArr = myArr.filter(function(item){
return arr2.indexOf(item) < 0 || arr1.indexOf(item) < 0;
});
alert(newArr);
}
diffArray(a1, a2);
Array.prototype.difference = function(e) {
return this.filter(function(i) {return e.indexOf(i) < 0;});
};
eg:-
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7].difference( [3,4,5] );
=> [1, 2, 6 , 7]
How about this:
Array.prototype.contains = function(needle){
for (var i=0; i<this.length; i++)
if (this[i] == needle) return true;
return false;
}
Array.prototype.diff = function(compare) {
return this.filter(function(elem) {return !compare.contains(elem);})
}
var a = new Array(1,4,7, 9);
var b = new Array(4, 8, 7);
alert(a.diff(b));
So this way you can do array1.diff(array2) to get their difference (Horrible time complexity for the algorithm though - O(array1.length x array2.length) I believe)
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = arr1.concat(arr2);
return newArr.filter(function(i){
return newArr.indexOf(i) == newArr.lastIndexOf(i);
});
}
this is works for me
If you have two list of objects
const people = [{name: 'cesar', age: 23}]
const morePeople = [{name: 'cesar', age: 23}, {name: 'kevin', age: 26}, {name: 'pedro', age: 25}]
let result2 = morePeople.filter(person => people.every(person2 => !person2.name.includes(person.name)))
Using http://phrogz.net/JS/ArraySetMath.js you can:
var array1 = ["test1", "test2","test3", "test4"];
var array2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"];
var array3 = array2.subtract( array1 );
// ["test5", "test6"]
var array4 = array1.exclusion( array2 );
// ["test5", "test6"]
Pure JavaScript solution (no libraries)
Compatible with older browsers (doesn't use filter)
O(n^2)
Optional fn callback parameter that lets you specify how to compare array items
function diff(a, b, fn){
var max = Math.max(a.length, b.length);
d = [];
fn = typeof fn === 'function' ? fn : false
for(var i=0; i < max; i++){
var ac = i < a.length ? a[i] : undefined
bc = i < b.length ? b[i] : undefined;
for(var k=0; k < max; k++){
ac = ac === undefined || (k < b.length && (fn ? fn(ac, b[k]) : ac == b[k])) ? undefined : ac;
bc = bc === undefined || (k < a.length && (fn ? fn(bc, a[k]) : bc == a[k])) ? undefined : bc;
if(ac == undefined && bc == undefined) break;
}
ac !== undefined && d.push(ac);
bc !== undefined && d.push(bc);
}
return d;
}
alert(
"Test 1: " +
diff(
[1, 2, 3, 4],
[1, 4, 5, 6, 7]
).join(', ') +
"\nTest 2: " +
diff(
[{id:'a',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'b',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'c',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'d',toString:function(){return this.id}}],
[{id:'a',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'e',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'f',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'d',toString:function(){return this.id}}],
function(a, b){ return a.id == b.id; }
).join(', ')
);
To find the difference of 2 arrays without duplicates:
function difference(arr1, arr2){
let setA = new Set(arr1);
let differenceSet = new Set(arr2.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
return [...differenceSet ];
}
1.difference([2,2,3,4],[2,3,3,4]) will return []
2.difference([1,2,3],[4,5,6]) will return [4,5,6]
3.difference([1,2,3,4],[1,2]) will return []
4.difference([1,2],[1,2,3,4]) will return [3,4]
Note: The above solution requires that you always send the larger array as the second parameter. To find the absolute difference, you will need to first find the larger array of the two and then work on them.
To find the absolute difference of 2 arrays without duplicates:
function absDifference(arr1, arr2){
const {larger, smaller} = arr1.length > arr2.length ?
{larger: arr1, smaller: arr2} : {larger: arr2, smaller: arr1}
let setA = new Set(smaller);
let absDifferenceSet = new Set(larger.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
return [...absDifferenceSet ];
}
1.absDifference([2,2,3,4],[2,3,3,4]) will return []
2.absDifference([1,2,3],[4,5,6]) will return [4,5,6]
3.absDifference([1,2,3,4],[1,2]) will return [3,4]
4.absDifference([1,2],[1,2,3,4]) will return [3,4]
Note the example 3 from both the solutions
Here is another solution that can return the differences, just like git diff: (it has been written in typescript, if you're not using typescript version, just remove the types)
/**
* util function to calculate the difference between two arrays (pay attention to 'from' and 'to'),
* it would return the mutations from 'from' to 'to'
* #param { T[] } from
* #param { T[] } to
* #returns { { [x in string]: boolean } } it would return the stringified version of array element, true means added,
* false means removed
*/
export function arrDiff<T>(from: T[], to: T[]): { [x in string]: boolean } {
var diff: { [x in string]: boolean } = {};
var newItems: T[] = []
diff = from.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
for (var i = 0; i < to.length; i++) {
if (diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]) {
delete diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]
} else {
newItems.push(to[i])
}
}
return {
...Object.keys(diff).reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: false }), {}),
...newItems.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
}
}
Here is a sample of usage:
arrDiff(['a', 'b', 'c'], ['a', 'd', 'c', 'f']) //{"b": false, "d": true, "f": true}
I wanted a similar function which took in an old array and a new array and gave me an array of added items and an array of removed items, and I wanted it to be efficient (so no .contains!).
You can play with my proposed solution here: http://jsbin.com/osewu3/12.
Can anyone see any problems/improvements to that algorithm? Thanks!
Code listing:
function diff(o, n) {
// deal with empty lists
if (o == undefined) o = [];
if (n == undefined) n = [];
// sort both arrays (or this won't work)
o.sort(); n.sort();
// don't compare if either list is empty
if (o.length == 0 || n.length == 0) return {added: n, removed: o};
// declare temporary variables
var op = 0; var np = 0;
var a = []; var r = [];
// compare arrays and add to add or remove lists
while (op < o.length && np < n.length) {
if (o[op] < n[np]) {
// push to diff?
r.push(o[op]);
op++;
}
else if (o[op] > n[np]) {
// push to diff?
a.push(n[np]);
np++;
}
else {
op++;np++;
}
}
// add remaining items
if( np < n.length )
a = a.concat(n.slice(np, n.length));
if( op < o.length )
r = r.concat(o.slice(op, o.length));
return {added: a, removed: r};
}
You can use underscore.js : http://underscorejs.org/#intersection
You have needed methods for array :
_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]);
=> [1, 3, 4]
_.intersection([1, 2, 3], [101, 2, 1, 10], [2, 1]);
=> [1, 2]
This is working: basically merge the two arrays, look for the duplicates and push what is not duplicated into a new array which is the difference.
function diff(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = [];
var arr = arr1.concat(arr2);
for (var i in arr){
var f = arr[i];
var t = 0;
for (j=0; j<arr.length; j++){
if(arr[j] === f){
t++;
}
}
if (t === 1){
newArr.push(f);
}
}
return newArr;
}
//es6 approach
function diff(a, b) {
var u = a.slice(); //dup the array
b.map(e => {
if (u.indexOf(e) > -1) delete u[u.indexOf(e)]
else u.push(e) //add non existing item to temp array
})
return u.filter((x) => {return (x != null)}) //flatten result
}
Hey guys how can I reorder the declaration of operators such that the result is 0 when logged??
numbers = [23, 12, 71, 10]
operators = [
(a, b) => a + b,
(a, b) => a / b,
(a, b) => a * b,
(a, b) => a - b
];
var result = 1;
operators.forEach(function(op) {
result = Math.floor(op(result, numbers[operators.indexOf(op)]))
});
console.log(result);
I'm halfway there but something just isn't clicking??
Cheers
Looks like this works!
numbers = [23, 12, 71, 10]
operators = [
(a, b) => a + b,
(a, b) => a - b,
(a, b) => a / b,
(a, b) => a * b
];
result = 1;
operators.forEach(function(op) {
result = Math.floor(op(result, numbers[operators.indexOf(op)]))
});
console.log(result);
I brute-forced this ordering to find it -- while result doesn't equal 0, shuffle operators, set result back to 1, and run the forEach, over and over, until result = 0. Here's the code to do it:
// From https://www.w3docs.com/snippets/javascript/how-to-randomize-shuffle-a-javascript-array.html
function shuffleArray(array) {
let curId = array.length;
// There remain elements to shuffle
while (0 !== curId) {
// Pick a remaining element
let randId = Math.floor(Math.random() * curId);
curId -= 1;
// Swap it with the current element.
let tmp = array[curId];
array[curId] = array[randId];
array[randId] = tmp;
}
return array;
}
numbers = [23, 12, 71, 10]
operators = [
(a, b) => a + b,
(a, b) => a - b,
(a, b) => a / b,
(a, b) => a * b
];
let result = 1;
while (result != 0) {
result = 1;
operators = shuffleArray(operators);
operators.forEach(function(op) {
result = Math.floor(op(result, numbers[operators.indexOf(op)]))
});
console.log(result);
}
console.log(operators);
Try to add this code line.
method = ['+','/','*','-']
result = method[operators.indexOf(op)]
Full correct code.
numbers = [23, 12, 71, 10]
method = ['+','/','*','-']
operators = [
(a, b) => a + b,
(a, b) => a / b,
(a, b) => a * b,
(a, b) => a - b
];
var ch = '';
var res = 1
operators.forEach(function(op) {
res = Math.floor(op(res, numbers[operators.indexOf(op)]))
if( res == 0) {
ch = method[operators.indexOf(op)]
}
});
console.log(res);
console.log(ch);
Hi so I'm having trouble figuring out why my function will do the division but leave the multiplication as an array without completing the math. Here's the code:
const mathObj = {
"*": function(a , b) {return a * b},
"/": function(a , b) {return a / b},
"+": function(a , b) {return a + b},
"-": function(a , b) {return a - b}
}
const arr = [ 10, "/" , 2 , "*" , 10 , "/" , 2 ];
function solveTheMath(arr) {
const len = arr.length;
for(let i = 0 ; i < len ; i++){
if(arr[i] === "/" || arr[i] === "*"){
const sliced = arr.slice(i - 1 , i + 2);
var mathResult = mathObj[arr[i]](sliced[0], sliced[2]);
arr.splice(i - 1 , 3, mathResult);
console.log(arr);
//[5*5]
}
}
}
solveTheMath(arr);
Why doesn't the multiplication work but the division does?
My initial answer, while it did solve the issue, wasn't that correct. You wanted to use an iterative approach by the look of things (i.e. using a loop to navigate through the initial array and solve all operations before returning the result).
So I replied to you:
Both operations work, the problem is that you're only calling solveTheMath once.
You need to call your function again to solve the array you have constructed. If the constructed array is made of only one element that means the process has reached the end of the computing, you can, therefore, return the first (and only element) of the array.
You are solving the problem in a recursive manner:
const mathObj = {
"*": function(a , b) {return a * b},
"/": function(a , b) {return a / b},
"+": function(a , b) {return a + b},
"-": function(a , b) {return a - b}
}
const arr = [ 10, "/" , 2 , "*" , 10 , "/" , 2 ];
function solveTheMath(arr) {
const len = arr.length;
for(let i = 0 ; i < len ; i++){
if(arr[i] === "/" || arr[i] === "*"){
const sliced = arr.slice(i - 1 , i + 2);
var mathResult = mathObj[arr[i]](sliced[0], sliced[2]);
arr.splice(i - 1 , 3, mathResult);
if(arr.length == 1) {
return arr[0]; // <- no more calculations needed, return result
} else {
return solveTheMath(arr); // <- more calculations needed, call it again
};
}
}
}
console.log(solveTheMath(arr))
But actually that isn't correct, you can use both approaches: recursive and iterative to solve this problem. My initial answer provided a poor solution: I kept your for loop and called the function again to solve the remaining operations that were in the array. That wasn't necessary because the for loop only looped to find the second item and stopped. Anyway, here's a clearer answer, highlighting both approaches.
Note: I have renamed solveTheMath to calculate and mathObj to operations.
Iterative approach
That's the approach you went for with your question. Because you are using a for loop to calculate all operations on a single function call (so the function isn't calling itself over and over).
I recommend using a while loop for this because **you will have a hard time looping arr when it gets modified (you are replacing three elements with one on each loop).
I'll take the array [10, "/", 2, "*", 10, "/", 2] as the starting array to show the process step by step. You can solve the first operation of the provided array. For example, given: , calculate will calculate the first operation here: 10, "/", 2
While the array contains more than one element we will do the following:
the first three elements of the array contain: two factors and an operator sign. By slicing the array we can extract those values and save them. I'm using a destructuring assignment to make it more verbose:
const [a, operator, b] = arr.slice(0, 3);
here a = 10, operator = "/" and b = 2
we will calculate the result of this operation with this line:
const result = operations[operator](a, b);
result = 5 (cf: 10 / 2)
then replace the first three elements of the array with the integer result:
arr.splice(0, 3, result);
at this point, arr is equal to [5, "*", 10, "/", 2]
The block has been executed, the while condition is checked again. arr does contain more than one element so the block is executed again. Remember, at this point arr is equal to [5, "*", 10, "/", 2], not to [10, "/", 2, "*", 10, "/", 2] (we are making progress in the calculation).
At the end of the second loop we have arr that is equal to [50, "/", 2].
A loop after that it is equal to [25].
The while condition isn't met anymore because arr only contains one element, the while loop has stopped and the result can be returned.
const operations = {
"*": (a, b) => a * b,
"/": (a, b) => a / b,
"+": (a, b) => a + b,
"-": (a, b) => a - b
}
const calculate = arr => {
while(arr.length > 1) { // <- while there are calculations to be done, repeat this block
const [a, operator, b] = arr.slice(0, 3);
const result = operations[operator](a, b);
arr.splice(0, 3, result);
}
return arr[0]; // <- no more operations to be done, return result
}
console.log(calculate(
[10, "/", 2, "*", 10, "/", 2]
));
Recursive approach
We can use a recursive approach: the function will only calculate the first operation of the provided array and return a new array with the result of this first operation.
Here is an example:
Same as in the iterative array, given the input [10, "/", 2, "*", 10, "/", 2] we will first take the first two factors and operator sign by slicing the array. Then we will calculate the result of the operation. Finally, we'll replace the first three elements of the array with this result:
const [a, operator, b] = arr.slice(0, 3);
const result = operations[operator](a, b);
arr.splice(0, 3, result);
then we check the length of this array:
if it contains only one element, it can be returned
else if it doesn't (in our case) we call the function again (this time on [5, "*", 10, "/", 2]).
So the function runs again with a new input and arr becomes [50, "/", 2] which has more than one element so the function needs to be called again (with [50, "/", 2] as input)
Now, arr is [25] it only contains one element, the result can be returned (25).
const operations = {
"*": (a, b) => a * b,
"/": (a, b) => a / b,
"+": (a, b) => a + b,
"-": (a, b) => a - b
}
const calculate = arr => {
const [a, operator, b] = arr.slice(0, 3);
const result = operations[operator](a, b);
arr.splice(0, 3, result);
if (arr.length == 1) {
return arr[0]; // <- no more calculations needed, return result
} else {
return calculate(arr); // <- more calculations needed, call it again
}
}
console.log(calculate(
[10, "/", 2, "*", 10, "/", 2]
));
Going further...
You can see both methods are quite similar: the main process is the same but the way they handle the end of execution is different. In this case, both are reasonable to use. The iterative approach may seem more natural to you at first. However remember that recursion can allow you to solve more complicated problems. For example, if you would like to implement a kind parenthesis system in your function:
How would you go about calculating: 10*(2+2)/2? calculate([10, "*", 2, "+", 2, "/", 2]) would obviously return 11...
Take the input [[10, "+", 2], "/", 2] instead, that makes more sense! How can we calculate the correct result?
Well with our recursive approach this can be implemented quite easily: if a or/and b are arrays then we reassign them by calling calculate on them. That's all:
if(a.constructor == Array) {
a = calculate(a);
}
if(b.constructor == Array) {
b = calculate(b);
}
const operations = {
"*": (a, b) => a * b,
"/": (a, b) => a / b,
"+": (a, b) => a + b,
"-": (a, b) => a - b
}
const calculate = arr => {
let [a, operator, b] = arr.slice(0, 3);
if(a.constructor == Array) {
a = calculate(a);
}
if(b.constructor == Array) {
b = calculate(b);
}
const result = operations[operator](a, b);
arr.splice(0, 3, result);
if (arr.length == 1) {
return arr[0]; // <- no more calculations needed, return result
} else {
return calculate(arr); // <- more calculations needed, call it again
}
}
console.log(calculate(
[[10, "+", 2], "/", 2]
));
Adding those two if blocks in the while loop of the iterative approach would have worked. But then you would be left with a... recursive function. That's why you may want to go straight off with the recursive approach. That allows you to expand your code more easily.
More reference on recursion
Recursion in JavaScript, freecodecamp.org
How factorial's recursive implementation works, wikimedia
Understanding recursive functions in JavaScript, medium.com
Scope and the function stack: recursion, MDN web docs
I'm trying to make a change to a variable using a custom operator (I will explain it clearlier now).
I have an array of numbers, and I have to reduce() it. First 2 numbers will be added, then in the second reducing they will be substracted, then multiplied, divided and exponentiated. Basically:
[1,2,3,4,5] -> 0
1+2=3
3-3=0
0*4=0
0/5=0 -> 0
So I saw an implementation like this:
f => f.reduce((a,b,c) => [a + b, a - b, a * b, a / b, a ** b][c % 5])
And wondered, can I make an array of operators in some way, and implement it like this?
f => f.reduce((a,b,c) => a [+,-,*,/,**][c%5] b)
Clearly this syntax is incorrect, but in the terms of an idea, does something like this exist?
You can use eval() method
var f = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(
f.reduce((a, b, c) => eval(a + ['+', '-', '*', '/'][c-1] + b))
);
Also I don't prefer to use eval(), refer : Don't use eval needlessly!
UPDATE :
Also as #NinaScholz said, you can reduce the code by using string instead of string array. Both string and array have same effect in this case.
var f = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
console.log(
f.reduce((a, b, c) => eval(a + '+-*/'[c - 1] + b))
);
You can try something like this
var add = function(a, b) {
return a + b;
},
sub = function(a, b) {
return a - b;
},
mul = function(a, b) {
return a * b;
},
div = function(a, b) {
return a / b;
};
var operations = [add, sub, mul, div];
var output = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].reduce(function(p, c, i) {
return operations[i - 1](p, c)
});
console.log(output);
You can add more functions (custom operators) and decide the order of operations.
You could use an array for the operators.
var array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5],
op = [
(a, b) => a + b,
(a, b) => a - b,
(a, b) => a * b,
(a, b) => a / b,
];
console.log(array.reduce((r, a, i) => op[(i - 1) % 4](r, a)));
Is there a way to return the difference between two arrays in JavaScript?
For example:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
// need ["c", "d"]
There is a better way using ES7:
Intersection
let intersection = arr1.filter(x => arr2.includes(x));
For [1,2,3] [2,3] it will yield [2,3]. On the other hand, for [1,2,3] [2,3,5] will return the same thing.
Difference
let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));
For [1,2,3] [2,3] it will yield [1]. On the other hand, for [1,2,3] [2,3,5] will return the same thing.
For a symmetric difference, you can do:
let difference = arr1
.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x))
.concat(arr2.filter(x => !arr1.includes(x)));
This way, you will get an array containing all the elements of arr1 that are not in arr2 and vice-versa
As #Joshaven Potter pointed out on his answer, you can add this to Array.prototype so it can be used like this:
Array.prototype.diff = function(arr2) { return this.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x)); }
[1, 2, 3].diff([2, 3])
Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
return this.filter(function(i) {return a.indexOf(i) < 0;});
};
//////////////
// Examples //
//////////////
const dif1 = [1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5] );
console.log(dif1); // => [1, 2, 6]
const dif2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4","test5","test6"].diff(["test1","test2","test3","test4"]);
console.log(dif2); // => ["test5", "test6"]
Note .indexOf() and .filter() are not available before IE9.
This answer was written in 2009, so it is a bit outdated, also it's rather educational for understanding the problem. Best solution I'd use today would be
let difference = arr1.filter(x => !arr2.includes(x));
(credits to other author here)
I assume you are comparing a normal array. If not, you need to change the for loop to a for .. in loop.
function arr_diff (a1, a2) {
var a = [], diff = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) {
a[a1[i]] = true;
}
for (var i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) {
if (a[a2[i]]) {
delete a[a2[i]];
} else {
a[a2[i]] = true;
}
}
for (var k in a) {
diff.push(k);
}
return diff;
}
console.log(arr_diff(['a', 'b'], ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']));
console.log(arr_diff("abcd", "abcde"));
console.log(arr_diff("zxc", "zxc"));
This is by far the easiest way to get exactly the result you are looking for, using jQuery:
var diff = $(old_array).not(new_array).get();
diff now contains what was in old_array that is not in new_array
The difference method in Underscore (or its drop-in replacement, Lo-Dash) can do this too:
(R)eturns the values from array that are not present in the other arrays
_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]);
=> [1, 3, 4]
As with any Underscore function, you could also use it in a more object-oriented style:
_([1, 2, 3, 4, 5]).difference([5, 2, 10]);
Plain JavaScript
There are two possible intepretations for "difference". I'll let you choose which one you want. Say you have:
var a1 = ['a', 'b' ];
var a2 = [ 'b', 'c'];
If you want to get ['a'], use this function:
function difference(a1, a2) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) {
if (a2.indexOf(a1[i]) === -1) {
result.push(a1[i]);
}
}
return result;
}
If you want to get ['a', 'c'] (all elements contained in either a1 or a2, but not both -- the so-called symmetric difference), use this function:
function symmetricDifference(a1, a2) {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < a1.length; i++) {
if (a2.indexOf(a1[i]) === -1) {
result.push(a1[i]);
}
}
for (i = 0; i < a2.length; i++) {
if (a1.indexOf(a2[i]) === -1) {
result.push(a2[i]);
}
}
return result;
}
Lodash / Underscore
If you are using lodash, you can use _.difference(a1, a2) (case 1 above) or _.xor(a1, a2) (case 2).
If you are using Underscore.js, you can use the _.difference(a1, a2) function for case 1.
ES6 Set, for very large arrays
The code above works on all browsers. However, for large arrays of more than about 10,000 items, it becomes quite slow, because it has O(n²) complexity. On many modern browsers, we can take advantage of the ES6 Set object to speed things up. Lodash automatically uses Set when it's available. If you are not using lodash, use the following implementation, inspired by Axel Rauschmayer's blog post:
function difference(a1, a2) {
var a2Set = new Set(a2);
return a1.filter(function(x) { return !a2Set.has(x); });
}
function symmetricDifference(a1, a2) {
return difference(a1, a2).concat(difference(a2, a1));
}
Notes
The behavior for all examples may be surprising or non-obvious if you care about -0, +0, NaN or sparse arrays. (For most uses, this doesn't matter.)
A cleaner approach in ES6 is the following solution.
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
Difference
a2.filter(d => !a1.includes(d)) // gives ["c", "d"]
Intersection
a2.filter(d => a1.includes(d)) // gives ["a", "b"]
Disjunctive Union (Symmetric Difference)
[ ...a2.filter(d => !a1.includes(d)),
...a1.filter(d => !a2.includes(d)) ]
To get the symmetric difference you need to compare the arrays in both ways (or in all the ways in case of multiple arrays)
ES7 (ECMAScript 2016)
// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
return [
...a.filter(x => !b.includes(x)),
...b.filter(x => !a.includes(x))
];
}
// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff(...arrays) {
return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
const others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
return arr.filter(x => !unique.includes(x));
}));
}
ES6 (ECMAScript 2015)
// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
return [
...a.filter(x => b.indexOf(x) === -1),
...b.filter(x => a.indexOf(x) === -1)
];
}
// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff(...arrays) {
return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
const others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
return arr.filter(x => unique.indexOf(x) === -1);
}));
}
ES5 (ECMAScript 5.1)
// diff between just two arrays:
function arrayDiff(a, b) {
var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var diff = [];
arrays.forEach(function(arr, i) {
var other = i === 1 ? a : b;
arr.forEach(function(x) {
if (other.indexOf(x) === -1) {
diff.push(x);
}
});
})
return diff;
}
// diff between multiple arrays:
function arrayDiff() {
var arrays = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var diff = [];
arrays.forEach(function(arr, i) {
var others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
var otherValues = Array.prototype.concat.apply([], others);
var unique = otherValues.filter(function (x, j) {
return otherValues.indexOf(x) === j;
});
diff = diff.concat(arr.filter(x => unique.indexOf(x) === -1));
});
return diff;
}
Example:
// diff between two arrays:
const a = ['a', 'd', 'e'];
const b = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a, b); // (3) ["e", "b", "c"]
// diff between multiple arrays
const a = ['b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'g'];
const b = ['a', 'b'];
const c = ['a', 'e', 'f'];
arrayDiff(a, b, c); // (4) ["c", "d", "g", "f"]
Difference between Arrays of Objects
function arrayDiffByKey(key, ...arrays) {
return [].concat(...arrays.map( (arr, i) => {
const others = arrays.slice(0);
others.splice(i, 1);
const unique = [...new Set([].concat(...others))];
return arr.filter( x =>
!unique.some(y => x[key] === y[key])
);
}));
}
Example:
const a = [{k:1}, {k:2}, {k:3}];
const b = [{k:1}, {k:4}, {k:5}, {k:6}];
const c = [{k:3}, {k:5}, {k:7}];
arrayDiffByKey('k', a, b, c); // (4) [{k:2}, {k:4}, {k:6}, {k:7}]
You could use a Set in this case. It is optimized for this kind of operation (union, intersection, difference).
Make sure it applies to your case, once it allows no duplicates.
var a = new JS.Set([1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]);
var b = new JS.Set([2,4,6,8]);
a.difference(b)
// -> Set{1,3,5,7,9}
One Liners
const unique = (a) => [...new Set(a)];
const uniqueBy = (x,f)=>Object.values(x.reduce((a,b)=>((a[f(b)]=b),a),{}));
const intersection = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => b.includes(v));
const diff = (a, b) => a.filter((v) => !b.includes(v));
const symDiff = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(diff(b, a));
const union = (a, b) => diff(a, b).concat(b);
const a = unique([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]);
console.log(a);
const b = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8];
console.log(intersection(a, b), diff(a, b), symDiff(a, b), union(a, b));
console.log(uniqueBy(
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 2, name: "xyz" },
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
],
(v) => v.id
));
const intersectionBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => b.some((u) => f(v, u)));
console.log(intersectionBy(
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 2, name: "xyz" },
],
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 3, name: "pqr" },
],
(v, u) => v.id === u.id
));
const diffBy = (a, b, f) => a.filter((v) => !b.some((u) => f(v, u)));
console.log(diffBy(
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 2, name: "xyz" },
],
[
{ id: 1, name: "abc" },
{ id: 3, name: "pqr" },
],
(v, u) => v.id === u.id
));
TypeScript
playground link
const unique = <T>(array: T[]) => [...new Set(array)];
const intersection = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
array1.filter((v) => array2.includes(v));
const diff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
array1.filter((v) => !array2.includes(v));
const symDiff = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
diff(array1, array2).concat(diff(array2, array1));
const union = <T>(array1: T[], array2: T[]) =>
diff(array1, array2).concat(array2);
const intersectionBy = <T>(
array1: T[],
array2: T[],
predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));
const diffBy = <T>(
array1: T[],
array2: T[],
predicate: (array1Value: T, array2Value: T) => boolean
) => array1.filter((v) => !array2.some((u) => predicate(v, u)));
const uniqueBy = <T>(
array: T[],
predicate: (v: T, i: number, a: T[]) => string
) =>
Object.values(
array.reduce((acc, value, index) => {
acc[predicate(value, index, array)] = value;
return acc;
}, {} as { [key: string]: T })
);
function diff(a1, a2) {
return a1.concat(a2).filter(function(val, index, arr){
return arr.indexOf(val) === arr.lastIndexOf(val);
});
}
Merge both the arrays, unique values will appear only once so indexOf() will be the same as lastIndexOf().
With the arrival of ES6 with sets and splat operator (at the time of being works only in Firefox, check compatibility table), you can write the following one liner:
var a = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
var b = ['a', 'b'];
var b1 = new Set(b);
var difference = [...new Set(a.filter(x => !b1.has(x)))];
which will result in [ "c", "d" ].
to subtract one array from another, simply use the snippet below:
var a1 = ['1','2','3','4','6'];
var a2 = ['3','4','5'];
var items = new Array();
items = jQuery.grep(a1,function (item) {
return jQuery.inArray(item, a2) < 0;
});
It will returns ['1,'2','6'] that are items of first array which don't exist in the second.
Therefore, according to your problem sample, following code is the exact solution:
var array1 = ["test1", "test2","test3", "test4"];
var array2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"];
var _array = new Array();
_array = jQuery.grep(array2, function (item) {
return jQuery.inArray(item, array1) < 0;
});
Another way to solve the problem
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.concat(arr2).filter(function (val) {
if (!(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)))
return val;
});
}
diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]); // return [7, 4, 5]
Also, you can use arrow function syntax:
const diffArray = (arr1, arr2) => arr1.concat(arr2)
.filter(val => !(arr1.includes(val) && arr2.includes(val)));
diffArray([1, 2, 3, 7], [3, 2, 1, 4, 5]); // return [7, 4, 5]
Functional approach with ES2015
Computing the difference between two arrays is one of the Set operations. The term already indicates that the native Set type should be used, in order to increase the lookup speed. Anyway, there are three permutations when you compute the difference between two sets:
[+left difference] [-intersection] [-right difference]
[-left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
[+left difference] [-intersection] [+right difference]
Here is a functional solution that reflects these permutations.
Left difference:
// small, reusable auxiliary functions
const apply = f => x => f(x);
const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y);
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
// left difference
const differencel = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? false
: true
) (xs);
};
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
// run the computation
console.log( differencel(xs) (ys) );
Right difference:
differencer is trivial. It is just differencel with flipped arguments. You can write a function for convenience: const differencer = flip(differencel). That's all!
Symmetric difference:
Now that we have the left and right one, implementing the symmetric difference gets trivial as well:
// small, reusable auxiliary functions
const apply = f => x => f(x);
const flip = f => y => x => f(x) (y);
const concat = y => xs => xs.concat(y);
const createSet = xs => new Set(xs);
const filter = f => xs => xs.filter(apply(f));
// left difference
const differencel = xs => ys => {
const zs = createSet(ys);
return filter(x => zs.has(x)
? false
: true
) (xs);
};
// symmetric difference
const difference = ys => xs =>
concat(differencel(xs) (ys)) (flip(differencel) (xs) (ys));
// mock data
const xs = [1,2,2,3,4,5];
const ys = [0,1,2,3,3,3,6,7,8,9];
// run the computation
console.log( difference(xs) (ys) );
I guess this example is a good starting point to obtain an impression what functional programming means:
Programming with building blocks that can be plugged together in many different ways.
A solution using indexOf() will be ok for small arrays but as they grow in length the performance of the algorithm approaches O(n^2). Here's a solution that will perform better for very large arrays by using objects as associative arrays to store the array entries as keys; it also eliminates duplicate entries automatically but only works with string values (or values which can be safely stored as strings):
function arrayDiff(a1, a2) {
var o1={}, o2={}, diff=[], i, len, k;
for (i=0, len=a1.length; i<len; i++) { o1[a1[i]] = true; }
for (i=0, len=a2.length; i<len; i++) { o2[a2[i]] = true; }
for (k in o1) { if (!(k in o2)) { diff.push(k); } }
for (k in o2) { if (!(k in o1)) { diff.push(k); } }
return diff;
}
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
arrayDiff(a1, a2); // => ['c', 'd']
arrayDiff(a2, a1); // => ['c', 'd']
The above answer by Joshaven Potter is great. But it returns elements in array B that are not in array C, but not the other way around. For example, if var a=[1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5,7]); then it will output: ==> [1,2,6], but not [1,2,6,7], which is the actual difference between the two. You can still use Potter's code above but simply redo the comparison once backwards too:
Array.prototype.diff = function(a) {
return this.filter(function(i) {return !(a.indexOf(i) > -1);});
};
////////////////////
// Examples
////////////////////
var a=[1,2,3,4,5,6].diff( [3,4,5,7]);
var b=[3,4,5,7].diff([1,2,3,4,5,6]);
var c=a.concat(b);
console.log(c);
This should output: [ 1, 2, 6, 7 ]
Very Simple Solution with the filter function of JavaScript:
var a1 = ['a', 'b'];
var a2 = ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'];
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = [];
var myArr = arr1.concat(arr2);
newArr = myArr.filter(function(item){
return arr2.indexOf(item) < 0 || arr1.indexOf(item) < 0;
});
alert(newArr);
}
diffArray(a1, a2);
Array.prototype.difference = function(e) {
return this.filter(function(i) {return e.indexOf(i) < 0;});
};
eg:-
[1,2,3,4,5,6,7].difference( [3,4,5] );
=> [1, 2, 6 , 7]
How about this:
Array.prototype.contains = function(needle){
for (var i=0; i<this.length; i++)
if (this[i] == needle) return true;
return false;
}
Array.prototype.diff = function(compare) {
return this.filter(function(elem) {return !compare.contains(elem);})
}
var a = new Array(1,4,7, 9);
var b = new Array(4, 8, 7);
alert(a.diff(b));
So this way you can do array1.diff(array2) to get their difference (Horrible time complexity for the algorithm though - O(array1.length x array2.length) I believe)
function diffArray(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = arr1.concat(arr2);
return newArr.filter(function(i){
return newArr.indexOf(i) == newArr.lastIndexOf(i);
});
}
this is works for me
If you have two list of objects
const people = [{name: 'cesar', age: 23}]
const morePeople = [{name: 'cesar', age: 23}, {name: 'kevin', age: 26}, {name: 'pedro', age: 25}]
let result2 = morePeople.filter(person => people.every(person2 => !person2.name.includes(person.name)))
Using http://phrogz.net/JS/ArraySetMath.js you can:
var array1 = ["test1", "test2","test3", "test4"];
var array2 = ["test1", "test2","test3","test4", "test5", "test6"];
var array3 = array2.subtract( array1 );
// ["test5", "test6"]
var array4 = array1.exclusion( array2 );
// ["test5", "test6"]
Pure JavaScript solution (no libraries)
Compatible with older browsers (doesn't use filter)
O(n^2)
Optional fn callback parameter that lets you specify how to compare array items
function diff(a, b, fn){
var max = Math.max(a.length, b.length);
d = [];
fn = typeof fn === 'function' ? fn : false
for(var i=0; i < max; i++){
var ac = i < a.length ? a[i] : undefined
bc = i < b.length ? b[i] : undefined;
for(var k=0; k < max; k++){
ac = ac === undefined || (k < b.length && (fn ? fn(ac, b[k]) : ac == b[k])) ? undefined : ac;
bc = bc === undefined || (k < a.length && (fn ? fn(bc, a[k]) : bc == a[k])) ? undefined : bc;
if(ac == undefined && bc == undefined) break;
}
ac !== undefined && d.push(ac);
bc !== undefined && d.push(bc);
}
return d;
}
alert(
"Test 1: " +
diff(
[1, 2, 3, 4],
[1, 4, 5, 6, 7]
).join(', ') +
"\nTest 2: " +
diff(
[{id:'a',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'b',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'c',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'d',toString:function(){return this.id}}],
[{id:'a',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'e',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'f',toString:function(){return this.id}},{id:'d',toString:function(){return this.id}}],
function(a, b){ return a.id == b.id; }
).join(', ')
);
To find the difference of 2 arrays without duplicates:
function difference(arr1, arr2){
let setA = new Set(arr1);
let differenceSet = new Set(arr2.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
return [...differenceSet ];
}
1.difference([2,2,3,4],[2,3,3,4]) will return []
2.difference([1,2,3],[4,5,6]) will return [4,5,6]
3.difference([1,2,3,4],[1,2]) will return []
4.difference([1,2],[1,2,3,4]) will return [3,4]
Note: The above solution requires that you always send the larger array as the second parameter. To find the absolute difference, you will need to first find the larger array of the two and then work on them.
To find the absolute difference of 2 arrays without duplicates:
function absDifference(arr1, arr2){
const {larger, smaller} = arr1.length > arr2.length ?
{larger: arr1, smaller: arr2} : {larger: arr2, smaller: arr1}
let setA = new Set(smaller);
let absDifferenceSet = new Set(larger.filter(ele => !setA.has(ele)));
return [...absDifferenceSet ];
}
1.absDifference([2,2,3,4],[2,3,3,4]) will return []
2.absDifference([1,2,3],[4,5,6]) will return [4,5,6]
3.absDifference([1,2,3,4],[1,2]) will return [3,4]
4.absDifference([1,2],[1,2,3,4]) will return [3,4]
Note the example 3 from both the solutions
Here is another solution that can return the differences, just like git diff: (it has been written in typescript, if you're not using typescript version, just remove the types)
/**
* util function to calculate the difference between two arrays (pay attention to 'from' and 'to'),
* it would return the mutations from 'from' to 'to'
* #param { T[] } from
* #param { T[] } to
* #returns { { [x in string]: boolean } } it would return the stringified version of array element, true means added,
* false means removed
*/
export function arrDiff<T>(from: T[], to: T[]): { [x in string]: boolean } {
var diff: { [x in string]: boolean } = {};
var newItems: T[] = []
diff = from.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
for (var i = 0; i < to.length; i++) {
if (diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]) {
delete diff[JSON.stringify(to[i])]
} else {
newItems.push(to[i])
}
}
return {
...Object.keys(diff).reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: false }), {}),
...newItems.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [JSON.stringify(e)]: true }), {})
}
}
Here is a sample of usage:
arrDiff(['a', 'b', 'c'], ['a', 'd', 'c', 'f']) //{"b": false, "d": true, "f": true}
I wanted a similar function which took in an old array and a new array and gave me an array of added items and an array of removed items, and I wanted it to be efficient (so no .contains!).
You can play with my proposed solution here: http://jsbin.com/osewu3/12.
Can anyone see any problems/improvements to that algorithm? Thanks!
Code listing:
function diff(o, n) {
// deal with empty lists
if (o == undefined) o = [];
if (n == undefined) n = [];
// sort both arrays (or this won't work)
o.sort(); n.sort();
// don't compare if either list is empty
if (o.length == 0 || n.length == 0) return {added: n, removed: o};
// declare temporary variables
var op = 0; var np = 0;
var a = []; var r = [];
// compare arrays and add to add or remove lists
while (op < o.length && np < n.length) {
if (o[op] < n[np]) {
// push to diff?
r.push(o[op]);
op++;
}
else if (o[op] > n[np]) {
// push to diff?
a.push(n[np]);
np++;
}
else {
op++;np++;
}
}
// add remaining items
if( np < n.length )
a = a.concat(n.slice(np, n.length));
if( op < o.length )
r = r.concat(o.slice(op, o.length));
return {added: a, removed: r};
}
You can use underscore.js : http://underscorejs.org/#intersection
You have needed methods for array :
_.difference([1, 2, 3, 4, 5], [5, 2, 10]);
=> [1, 3, 4]
_.intersection([1, 2, 3], [101, 2, 1, 10], [2, 1]);
=> [1, 2]
This is working: basically merge the two arrays, look for the duplicates and push what is not duplicated into a new array which is the difference.
function diff(arr1, arr2) {
var newArr = [];
var arr = arr1.concat(arr2);
for (var i in arr){
var f = arr[i];
var t = 0;
for (j=0; j<arr.length; j++){
if(arr[j] === f){
t++;
}
}
if (t === 1){
newArr.push(f);
}
}
return newArr;
}
//es6 approach
function diff(a, b) {
var u = a.slice(); //dup the array
b.map(e => {
if (u.indexOf(e) > -1) delete u[u.indexOf(e)]
else u.push(e) //add non existing item to temp array
})
return u.filter((x) => {return (x != null)}) //flatten result
}