I am Facing this Problem, my randomPoints array element is getting replaced by push method.
Here is the output of my Console
I don't know why this is happening but if I don't use randomPoint.add, it dosen't replaces and work fine.
randomPoint.add retuns the same Vector object as it would return without it.
var hw
var center
var randomPoints = []
var pointWidth = 20
var points = 300
centerCircleWidth = 300;
pointsOffset = 10
function setup(){
hw = createVector(600,500)
createCanvas(hw.x,hw.y)
center = createVector(hw.x/2,hw.y/2)
var randomPoint = createVector(0,0)
randomPoints.push(randomPoint)
randomPoint = p5.Vector.fromAngle(-radians(120), random(centerCircleWidth/2-pointWidth,centerCircleWidth/2-pointsOffset))
randomPoints.push(randomPoint)
console.log(randomPoint)
randomPoint = randomPoint.add(p5.Vector.fromAngle(radians(60), random(pointsOffset,2*pointsOffset)))
// this here replaces the last element of array by itself and add another element of same type.
randomPoints.push(randomPoint)
console.log(randomPoint)
console.log(randomPoints)
}
function draw(){
translate(center.x, center.y)
background(51);
strokeWeight(0)
fill(255)
ellipse(0,0, centerCircleWidth, centerCircleWidth)
for(i=0;i<randomPoints.length;i++){
fill(10)
ellipse(randomPoints[i].x,randomPoints[i].y,pointWidth,pointWidth)
}
}
Your problems looks to be an object reference problem. The third push isn't replacing the previous element in the array, but you are updating the reference which the array is holding, therefore the element in the array is being updated.
If you remove the third push, you will see that the second item in the array will still be updated.
What you need to do is either create a copy of randomPoint and then make a change to it, or create a new variable.
Take a look at this SOF answer which should make it clearer.
Related
So, I have this function that, after an update, deletes elements from a table. The function, lets call it foo(), takes in one parameter.
foo(obj);
This object obj, has a subfield within called messages of type Array. So, it would appear something like this:
obj.messages = [...];
Additionally, inside of obj.messages, each element contains an object that has another subfield called id. So, this looks something like:
obj.messages = [{to:"You",from:"Me",id:"QWERTY12345.v1"}, ...];
Now, in addition to the parameter, I have a live table that is also being referenced by the function foo. It uses a dataTable element that I called oTable. I then grab the rows of oTable and copy them into an Array called theCurrentTable.
var theCurrentTable = oTable.$('tr').slice(0);
Now, where it gets tricky, is when I look into the Array theCurrentTable, I returned values appear like this.
theCurrentTable = ["tr#messagesTable-item-QWERTY12345_v1", ...];
The loop below shows how I tried to show the problem. While it works (seemingly), the function itself can have over 1000 messages, and this is an extremely costly function. All it is doing is checking to see if the current displayed table has the elements given in the parameter, and if not a particular element, delete it. How can I better write this function?
var theCurrentTable = oTable.$('tr').slice(0);
var theReceivedMessages = obj.messages.slice(0);
for(var idx = 0; idx < theCurrentTable.length; idx++){ // through display
var displayID = theCurrentTable[idx].id.replace('messagesTable-item-','').replace('_','.');
var deletionPending = true;
for(var x = 0; x < theReceivedMessages.length; x++){
var messageID = theReceivedMessages[x].id;
if(diplayID == messageID){
console.log(displayID+' is safe...');
deletionPending = false;
}
}
if(deletionPending){
oTable.fnDeleteRow(idx);
}
}
I think I understand your problem. Your <tr> elements have an id that should match an item id within your messages.
First you should extract the message id values you need from the obj parameter
var ids = obj.messages.map(function (m) { return '#messagesTable-item-' + m.id; });
This will give you all the rows ids you need to keep and then join the array together to use jQuery to select the rows you don't want and remove them.
$('tr').not(ids.join(',')).remove();
Note: The Array.prototype.map() function is only supported from IE9 so you may need to use jQuery.map().
You could create a Set of the message ID values you have, so you can later detect if a given ID is in this Set in constant time.
Here is how that would look:
var theCurrentTable = oTable.$('tr').slice(0);
var theReceivedMessages = obj.messages.slice(0);
// Pre-processing: create a set of message id values:
var ids = new Set(theReceivedMessages.map( msg => msg.id ));
theCurrentTable.forEach(function (row, idx) { // through display
var displayID = row.id.replace('messagesTable-item-','').replace('_','.');
// Now you can skip the inner loop and just test whether the Set has the ID:
if(!ids.has(displayId)) {
oTable.fnDeleteRow(idx);
}
});
So now the time complexity is not any more O(n.m) -- where n is number of messages, and m the number of table rows -- but O(n+m), which for large values of n and m can make quite a difference.
Notes:
If theCurrentTable is not a true Array, then you might need to use a for loop like you did, or else use Array.from(theCurrentTable, function ...)
Secondly, the implementation of oTable.fnDeleteRow might be that you need to delete the last rows first, so that idx still points to the original row number. In that case you should reverse the loop, starting from the end.
If i try to add more keys with values to a javascript object it alters the value of all keys, not just the one I have added.
var corridorObject = {};
var makeObjects = [];
function someFunction(){
var a = makePoints;
var Corridor = viewer.entities.add({
corridor : {
positions : (a),
width : 10.0,
material : Cesium.Color.GREEN,
}
var idv0 = Corridor.id
corridorObject[idv0] = makeObjects;
console.log(corridorObject);
makeObjects.length=0;
}
The Corridor ID is a guid, the makeObjects an array of objects, when I run this it adds the key perfectly, and the values, but when I run it a second time it adds a new key with the new ID and new values, but it also changes the values for all the other keys to the most recent values.
here is the console, as you can see the first time the array for the ID is 3 long the second time with the same id its 2 long
Object {91ff9967-7019-4e76-846e-c0e125481060: Array[3]}
Object {91ff9967-7019-4e76-846e-c0e125481060: Array[2], 3de2c2b1-5fb6-495c-9034-2b37713e5c30: Array[2]}
Sorry to be more clear, this is from Cesiumjs, its taking points and converting them to a corridor, the corridor id and an array of the points that made it are then added to this object. The array of points is then emptied.
If you are repeating
var corridorObject = {};
var makeObjects = [];
var idv0 = Corridor.id
corridorObject[idv0] = makeObjects;
console.log(corridorObject);
These line of code then It will initialise
var corridorObject = {};
Thats why you will get only one key. Put initialization outside of the iteration
I have this code, which works pretty well :
var draw = [
{lat:60.06484046010452,lng:-121.640625}, {lat:50.064191736659104,lng:-136.40625}, {lat:50.958426723359935,lng:-103.7109375}
];
But Now, as the Values of the Variable draw needs to be changed at the runtime, I Wrote this code & I expect it allow changing draw values as the Values of the variable st changes :
var st = "{lat:60.06484046010452,lng:-121.640625},{lat:50.064191736659104,lng:-136.40625},{lat:50.958426723359935,lng:-103.7109375}";
var draw =[ st ];
But this isn't working, How can i make it work, I'm a noob, thank you
st is of type String, you can only manipulate it as a text would be.
I believe you are using objects wrong but you were using it right initially:
var draw = [{lat:60.06484046010452,lng:-121.640625}, {lat:50.064191736659104,lng:-136.40625}, {lat:50.958426723359935,lng:-103.7109375}];
Furthermore if you need to add objects to this array use the push method.
draw.push({ lat: 60.06484046010452, lng: -103.7109375 });
To remove from the end use the pop method:
var lastItem = draw.pop();
To add at the beginning use the unshift method and to remove use shift.
You just turned your object into a string. Just keep it as an object, and it will work fine (a.k.a remove the quotes):
var st = '[{"lat":60.06484046010452,"lng":-121.640625},{"lat":50.064191736659104,"lng":-136.40625},{"lat":50.958426723359935,"lng":-103.7109375}]';
var draw = JSON.parse(st);
Your original code works and you can edit it. The draw variable will be a list of objects and you can add and delete items:
var draw = [
{lat:60.06484046010452,lng:-121.640625}, {lat:50.064191736659104,lng:-136.40625}, {lat:50.958426723359935,lng:-103.7109375}
];
draw.push({lat:10.10101010,lng:20.20202020});
for(var i = 0; i < draw.length; i++){
document.write(draw[i].lat + " / " + draw[i].lng + "<br/>");
}
I have an svg map with several points where I want to store the initial position of each point in an array. And each point has it's own ID, like point_1, point_2 etc.
I have attached a click handler to each of these and run a function when they are clicked.
So what I want to do in this function is to check if the array already contains the information of the clicked element. If it doesn't, I want to create it.
This is what I want to do, in pseudo code
var arrPoints = [];
zoomToPoint('point_1');
function zoomToPoint(data_id) {
// Does array already contain the data?
if (!arrPoints.data_id) {
// Add data to the array
arrPoints.data_id.clientX = somevalue;
arrPoints.data_id.clientY = somevalue;
}
}
This would basically create an array that looks like this:
arrPoints.point_1[]
arrPoints.point_2[]
Where I can access the data in each .point_1 and .point_2.
But I can't create an array based on a variable, like this:
arrPoints.data_id = [];
Because I end up with data_id as the actual name, not the variable that data_id actually is. So how is this usually accomplished? How can I identify each point to the actual array?
Sorry for my lack of basics
Just use an object:
var arrPoints = {};
zoomToPoint('point_1');
function zoomToPoint(data_id) {
// Does array already contain the data?
if (!arrPoints[data_id]) { // square brackets to use `data_id` as index
// Add data to the array
arrPoints[data_id] = {};
arrPoints[data_id].clientX = somevalue;
arrPoints[data_id].clientY = somevalue;
}
}
This is annoying me.
I'm setting an array in beginning of the doc:
var idPartner;
var myar = new Array();
myar[0] = "http://example.com/"+idPartner;
And I'm getting a number over the address, which is the id of partner. Great. But I'm trying to set it without success:
$.address.change(function(event) {
idPartner = 3;
alert(idPartner);
}
Ok. The alert is giving me the right number, but isn't setting it.
What's wrong?
Changing the value of the variable does not re-set the values within the array. That is just something javascript can't do automatically. You would have to re-generate the array for it to have the new id. Could you add the id to the value where you use the array instead of pre-setting the values in the array containing the id?
Edit: For example, you would do:
var myArray = [];
var myId = 0;
myArray[0] = "http://foo.com/id/";
and when you need to use a value from the array, you would do this:
var theVal = myArray[0] + myId;
Try this:
var myvar = ["http://site.com/"];
$.address.change(function(event) {
myvar[1] = 3;
}
then use myvar.join () where you need the full url.
The problem here is that at the line
myar[0] = "http://site.com/"+idPartner;
..you perform a string concatenation, meaning you copy the resulting string into the array at index position 0.
Hence, when later setting idPartnerit won't have any effect on the previously copied string. To avoid such effect you can either always construct the string again when the idPartnervariable updates or you create an object and you evaluate it when you need it like...
var MyObject = function(){
this.idPartner = 0; //default value
};
MyObject.prototype.getUrl = function(){
return "http://site.com/" + this.idPartner;
};
In this way you could use it like
var myGlblUrlObj = new MyObject();
$.address.change(function(event){
myGlblUrlObj.idPartner = ... /setting it here
});
at some later point you can then always get the correct url using
myGlblUrlObj.getUrl();
Now obviously it depends on the complexity of your situation. Maybe the suggested array solution might work as well, although I prefer having it encapsulated somewhere in an object for better reusability.
myar[0] = "http://site.com/" + idPartner;
After this line, myar[0] = "http://site.com/undefined" and it has nothing to do with the variable idPartner no more.
So, after that changing the value of idPartner will affect the value of myar[0].
You need to change the value of myar[0] itself.