We Keep Coding

How to replace string between two string with the same length

I have an input string like this:
ABCDEFG[HIJKLMN]OPQRSTUVWXYZ
How can I replace each character in the string between the [] with an X (resulting in the same number of Xs as there were characters)?
For example, with the input above, I would like an output of:
ABCDEFG[XXXXXXX]OPQRSTUVWXYZ
I am using JavaScript's RegEx for this and would prefer if answers could be an implementation that does this using JavaScript's RegEx Replace function.
I am new to RegEx so please explain what you do and (if possible) link articles to where I can get further help.

Using replace() and passing the match to a function as parameter, and then Array(m.length).join("X") to generate the X's needed:
var str = "ABCDEFG[HIJKLMN]OPQRSTUVWXYZ"
str = str.replace(/\[[A-Z]*\]/g,(m)=>"["+Array(m.length-1).join("X")+"]")
console.log(str);
We could use also .* instead of [A-Z] in the regex to match any character.
About regular expressions there are thousands of resources, specifically in JavaScript, you could see Regular Expressions MDN but the best way to learn, in my opinion, is practicing, I find regex101 useful.

const str="ABCDEFG[HIJKLMN]OPQRSTUVWXYZ";
const run=str=>str.replace(/\[.*]/,(a,b,c)=>c=a.replace(/[^\[\]]/g,x=>x="X"));
console.log(run(str));
The first pattern /\[.*]/ is to select letters inside bracket [] and the second pattern /[^\[\]]/ is to replace the letters to "X"

We can observe that every individual letter you wish to match is followed by a series of zero or more non-'[' characters, until a ']' is found. This is quite simple to express in JavaScript-friendly regex:
/[A-Z](?=[^\[]*\])/g
regex101 example
(?= ) is a "positive lookahead assertion"; it peeks ahead of the current matching point, without consuming characters, to verify its contents are matched. In this case, "[^[]*]" matches exactly what I described above.
Now you can substitute each [A-Z] matched with a single 'X'.

You can use the following solution to replace a string between two square brackets:
const rxp = /\[.*?\]/g;
"ABCDEFG[HIJKLMN]OPQRSTUVWXYZ".replace(rxp, (x) => {
return x.replace(rxp, "X".repeat(x.length)-2);
});

javascript find protocol, domain, plus first slash with regexp from a src tag, replace with empty string

I tried to construct a regex for this task but I'm afraid I am still failing to have an intuitive understanding of regexp.
The problem is the regex matches until the last slash in a string. I want it to stop at the first match of the string.
My pathetic attempt at regex:
/^http(s?):\/\/.+\/{1}/
Test subject:
http://foo.com/bar/test/foo.jpeg
The goal is to obtain bar/test/foo.jpeg, so that I may then split the string, pop the last element and then join the remainder, resulting in having the path to the JavaScript file.
Example
var str = 'http://foo.com/bar/test/foo.jpeg';
str.replace(regexp,'');

While the other answer shows how to match a part of a string, I think a replace solution is more appropriate for the current task.
The issue you have is that .+ matches one or more characters other than a newline greedily, that is, all the string is grabbed first in one go, and then the regex engine starts backtracking (moving backwards along the input string looking for a / to accommodate in the match). Thus, you get the match from http until the last /.
To restrict the match from http to the first / use a negated character class [^/]+ instead of .+.
^https?:\/\/[^\/]+\/
^^^^^^
See the regex demo
Note that you do not need to place s into a capturing group to make it optional, unescaped ? is a quantifier that makes the preceding character match one or zero times. Also, {1} is a redundant quantifier since this is default behavior, c will only match 1 c, (?:something) will only match one something.
var re = /^https?:\/\/[^\/]+\//;
var str = 'http://foo.com/bar/test/foo.jpeg';
var result = str.replace(re, '');
document.getElementById("r").innerHTML = result;
<div id="r"/>
Note that you will need to assign the replace result to some variable, since in JS, strings are immutable.
Regex explanation:
^ - start of string
https? - either http or https substring
:\/\/ - a literal sequence of ://
[^\/]+ - 1 or more characters other than a /
\/ - a literal / symbol

Use capturing group based regex.
> var s = "http://foo.com/bar/test/foo.jpeg"
> s.match(/^https?:\/\/[^\/]+((?:\/[^\/]*)*)/)[1]
'/bar/test/foo.jpeg'

Javascript RegExp anomaly [duplicate]

I am trying to build a regexp from static text plus a variable in javascript. Obviously I am missing something very basic, see comments in code below. Help is very much appreciated:
var test_string = "goodweather";
// One regexp we just set:
var regexp1 = /goodweather/;
// The other regexp we built from a variable + static text:
var regexp_part = "good";
var regexp2 = "\/" + regexp_part + "weather\/";
// These alerts now show the 2 regexp are completely identical:
alert (regexp1);
alert (regexp2);
// But one works, the other doesn't ??
if (test_string.match(regexp1))
alert ("This is displayed.");
if (test_string.match(regexp2))
alert ("This is not displayed.");

First, the answer to the question:
The other answers are nearly correct, but fail to consider what happens when the text to be matched contains a literal backslash, (i.e. when: regexp_part contains a literal backslash). For example, what happens when regexp_part equals: "C:\Windows"? In this case the suggested methods do not work as expected (The resulting regex becomes: /C:\Windows/ where the \W is erroneously interpreted as a non-word character class). The correct solution is to first escape any backslashes in regexp_part (the needed regex is actually: /C:\\Windows/).
To illustrate the correct way of handling this, here is a function which takes a passed phrase and creates a regex with the phrase wrapped in \b word boundaries:
// Given a phrase, create a RegExp object with word boundaries.
function makeRegExp(phrase) {
// First escape any backslashes in the phrase string.
// i.e. replace each backslash with two backslashes.
phrase = phrase.replace(/\\/g, "\\\\");
// Wrap the escaped phrase with \b word boundaries.
var re_str = "\\b"+ phrase +"\\b";
// Create a new regex object with "g" and "i" flags set.
var re = new RegExp(re_str, "gi");
return re;
}
// Here is a condensed version of same function.
function makeRegExpShort(phrase) {
return new RegExp("\\b"+ phrase.replace(/\\/g, "\\\\") +"\\b", "gi");
}
To understand this in more depth, follows is a discussion...
In-depth discussion, or "What's up with all these backslashes!?"
JavaScript has two ways to create a RegExp object:
/pattern/flags - You can specify a RegExp Literal expression directly, where the pattern is delimited using a pair of forward slashes followed by any combination of the three pattern modifier flags: i.e. 'g' global, 'i' ignore-case, or 'm' multi-line. This type of regex cannot be created dynamically.
new RegExp("pattern", "flags") - You can create a RegExp object by calling the RegExp() constructor function and pass the pattern as a string (without forward slash delimiters) as the first parameter and the optional pattern modifier flags (also as a string) as the second (optional) parameter. This type of regex can be created dynamically.
The following example demonstrates creating a simple RegExp object using both of these two methods. Lets say we wish to match the word "apple". The regex pattern we need is simply: apple. Additionally, we wish to set all three modifier flags.
Example 1: Simple pattern having no special characters: apple
// A RegExp literal to match "apple" with all three flags set:
var re1 = /apple/gim;
// Create the same object using RegExp() constructor:
var re2 = new RegExp("apple", "gim");
Simple enough. However, there are significant differences between these two methods with regard to the handling of escaped characters. The regex literal syntax is quite handy because you only need to escape forward slashes - all other characters are passed directly to the regex engine unaltered. However, when using the RegExp constructor method, you pass the pattern as a string, and there are two levels of escaping to be considered; first is the interpretation of the string and the second is the interpretation of the regex engine. Several examples will illustrate these differences.
First lets consider a pattern which contains a single literal forward slash. Let's say we wish to match the text sequence: "and/or" in a case-insensitive manner. The needed pattern is: and/or.
Example 2: Pattern having one forward slash: and/or
// A RegExp literal to match "and/or":
var re3 = /and\/or/i;
// Create the same object using RegExp() :
var re4 = new RegExp("and/or", "i");
Note that with the regex literal syntax, the forward slash must be escaped (preceded with a single backslash) because with a regex literal, the forward slash has special meaning (it is a special metacharacter which is used to delimit the pattern). On the other hand, with the RegExp constructor syntax (which uses a string to store the pattern), the forward slash does NOT have any special meaning and does NOT need to be escaped.
Next lets consider a pattern which includes a special: \b word boundary regex metasequence. Say we wish to create a regex to match the word "apple" as a whole word only (so that it won't match "pineapple"). The pattern (as seen by the regex engine) needs to be: \bapple\b:
Example 3: Pattern having \b word boundaries: \bapple\b
// A RegExp literal to match the whole word "apple":
var re5 = /\bapple\b/;
// Create the same object using RegExp() constructor:
var re6 = new RegExp("\\bapple\\b");
In this case the backslash must be escaped when using the RegExp constructor method, because the pattern is stored in a string, and to get a literal backslash into a string, it must be escaped with another backslash. However, with a regex literal, there is no need to escape the backslash. (Remember that with a regex literal, the only special metacharacter is the forward slash.)
Backslash SOUP!
Things get even more interesting when we need to match a literal backslash. Let's say we want to match the text sequence: "C:\Program Files\JGsoft\RegexBuddy3\RegexBuddy.exe". The pattern to be processed by the regex engine needs to be: C:\\Program Files\\JGsoft\\RegexBuddy3\\RegexBuddy\.exe. (Note that the regex pattern to match a single backslash is \\ i.e. each must be escaped.) Here is how you create the needed RegExp object using the two JavaScript syntaxes
Example 4: Pattern to match literal back slashes:
// A RegExp literal to match the ultimate Windows regex debugger app:
var re7 = /C:\\Program Files\\JGsoft\\RegexBuddy3\\RegexBuddy\.exe/;
// Create the same object using RegExp() constructor:
var re8 = new RegExp(
"C:\\\\Program Files\\\\JGsoft\\\\RegexBuddy3\\\\RegexBuddy\\.exe");
This is why the /regex literal/ syntax is generally preferred over the new RegExp("pattern", "flags") method - it completely avoids the backslash soup that can frequently arise. However, when you need to dynamically create a regex, as the OP needs to here, you are forced to use the new RegExp() syntax and deal with the backslash soup. (Its really not that bad once you get your head wrapped 'round it.)
RegexBuddy to the rescue!
RegexBuddy is a Windows app that can help with this backslash soup problem - it understands the regex syntaxes and escaping requirements of many languages and will automatically add and remove backslashes as required when pasting to and from the application. Inside the application you compose and debug the regex in native regex format. Once the regex works correctly, you export it using one of the many "copy as..." options to get the needed syntax. Very handy!

You should use the RegExp constructor to accomplish this:
var regexp2 = new RegExp(regexp_part + "weather");
Here's a related question that might help.

The forward slashes are just Javascript syntax to enclose regular expresions in. If you use normal string as regex, you shouldn't include them as they will be matched against. Therefore you should just build the regex like that:
var regexp2 = regexp_part + "weather";

I would use :
var regexp2 = new RegExp(regexp_part+"weather");
Like you have done that does :
var regexp2 = "/goodweather/";
And after there is :
test_string.match("/goodweather/")
Wich use match with a string and not with the regex like you wanted :
test_string.match(/goodweather/)

While this solution may be overkill for this specific question, if you want to build RegExps programmatically, compose-regexp can come in handy.
This specific problem would be solved by using
import {sequence} from 'compose-regexp'
const weatherify = x => sequence(x, /weather/)
Strings are escaped, so
weatherify('.')
returns
/\.weather/
But it can also accept RegExps
weatherify(/./u)
returns
/.weather/u
compose-regexp supports the whole range of RegExps features, and let one build RegExps from sub-parts, which helps with code reuse and testability.

JavaScript regexp not matching

I am having a difficult time getting a seemingly simple Regexp. I am trying to grab the last occurrences of word characters between square brackets in a string. My code:
pattern = /\[(\w+)\]/g;
var text = "item[gemstones_attributes][0][shape]";
if (pattern.test(text)) {
alert(RegExp.lastMatch);
}
The above code is outputting "gemstones_attributes", when I want it to output "shape". Why is this regexp not working, or is there something wrong with my approach to getting the last match? I'm sure that I am making an obvious mistake - regular expressions have never been my string suit.
Edit:
There are cases in which the string will not terminate with a right-bracket.

You can greedily match as much as possible before your pattern which will result in your group matching only the last match:
pattern = /.*\[(\w+)\]/g;
var text = "item[gemstones_attributes][0][shape]";
var match = pattern.exec(text);
if (match != null) alert(match[1]);

RegExp.lastMatch gives the match of the last regular expression. It isn't the last match in the text.
Regular expressions parse left to right and are greedy. So your regexp matches the first '[' it sees and grabs the words between it. When you call lastMatch it gives you the last pattern matched. What you need is to match everything you can first .* and then your pattern.

i think your problem is in your regex not in your src line .lastMatch.
Your regex returns just the first match of your square brackets and not all matches. You can try to add some groups to your regular expression - and normally you should get all matches.
krikit

Use match() instead of test()
if (text.match(pattern))
test() checks for a match inside a string. This is successfull after the first occurence, so there is no need for further parsing.

Javascript: String replace problem

I've got a string which contains q="AWORD" and I want to replace q="AWORD" with q="THEWORD". However, I don't know what AWORD is.. is it possible to combine a string and a regex to allow me to replace the parameter without knowing it's value? This is what I've got thus far...
globalparam.replace('q="/+./"', 'q="AWORD"');

What you have is just a string, not a regular expression. I think this is what you want:
globalparam.replace(/q=".+?"/, 'q="THEWORD"');
I don't know how you got the idea why you have to "combine" a string and a regular expression, but a regex does not need to exist of wildcards only. A regex is like a pattern that can contain wildcards but otherwise will try to match the exact characters given.
The expression shown above works as follows:
q=": Match the characters q, = and ".
.+?": Match any character (.) up to (and including) the next ". There must be at least one character (+) and the match is non-greedy (?), meaning it tries to match as few characters as possible. Otherwise, if you used .+", it would match all characters up to the last quotation mark in the string.
Learn more about regular expressions.

Felix's answer will give you the solution, but if you actually want to construct a regular expression using a string you can do it this way:
var fullstring = 'q="AWORD"';
var sampleStrToFind = 'AWORD';
var mat = 'q="'+sampleStrToFind+'"';
var re = new RegExp(mat);
var newstr = fullstring.replace(re,'q="THEWORD"');
alert(newstr);
mat = the regex you are building, combining strings or whatever is needed.
re = RegExp constructor, if you wanted to do global, case sensitivity, etc do it here.
The last line is string.replace(RegExp,replacement);