Open the following on Safari and Chrome or Firefox.
https://prismjs.com/plugins/data-uri-highlight/
Now scroll right/left on the code sample. Did you notice it? Kind of a drag? What is that?
Is it a thing of prismjs? I mean, where should I change something to have same behavior on Safari as it is on Chrome/Firefox?
Here is what I did:
(I'm trying to make a source code visualizer. Similar to https://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/50866/view-multiple-pdf-side-by-side. I haven't seen anything like it before, have you? Features: 1. Side by side visualization of many files with horizontal scroll. 2. Per file independent vertical only scroll.)
index.html
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Welcome to nginx!</title>
<link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link href="themes/prism.css" rel="stylesheet" />
</head>
<body>
<script src="prism.js"></script>
<div id="content">
<div id="left">
<pre class="line-numbers" data-src="main.cpp"></pre>
</div>
<div id="right">
<pre class="line-numbers" data-src="main.cpp"></pre>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
style.css
#content, html, body {
height: 100%;
white-space: nowrap;
}
#left {
display: inline-block;
width: intrinsic;
background: black;
height: 100%;
overflow: scroll;
}
#right {
display: inline-block;
width: intrinsic;
background: black;
height: 100%;
overflow: scroll;
}
Width depends on the content (i.e. main.cpp).
Related
I have a container div right-col inside of my hero div, that holds two inner divs. The inner divs are sticky and the container div is scrollable to give the illusion of cards sliding up.
HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css">
<title>Document</title>
</head>
<body>
<div class="hero">
<div class="left-col">h</div>
<div class="right-col">
<div class="top">1st card</div>
<div class="bottom">2nd Card</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="projects">a</div>
<div class="contact-footer"></div>
<div></div>
</body>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
</script>
</html>
CSS:
body{
overflow: auto;
background-color: black;
}
.hero {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
.left-col{
width: 40vw;
background-color: black;
height: 100vh;
}
.right-col{
min-width: 60vw;
background-color: blue;
overflow: auto;
height: 100vh;
}
.top{
height: 100vh;
background-color: chartreuse;
position: sticky;
top: 0;
}
.bottom{
height: 100vh;
background-color: orange;
position: sticky;
top: 10%;
}
.projects{
height: 100vh;
background-color: crimson;
position: sticky;
top: 0;
}
However, the scroll bar is on the inside of the div right-col and independent from the main scrollbar. Is there a way that I can use the main scrollbar to scroll through the container div till it reaches the bottom then continues to scroll through the rest of the page? Possibly using js or jquery?
You could try adding the following css. It will make the inner scroll bar 0 width, so basically it will be invisible but still work.
.hero ::-webkit-scrollbar {
width: 0px;
}
If you need something more specific you could try using the scroll event to possibly synchronize both scroll bars or something.
I created this split screen view using split.js. Two divs are shown next to each other. You can drag the middle to make one bigger of smaller.
Now it would be nice to let the two divs automatically fall below each other if the screen is smaller than lets say 768 px, but offcourse keeping the split screen functionality.
Even better apart from automatically changing the view when scaling the browser it would be nice to give the user the option to choose for horizontal/vertical themselves as well. So this way they can overrule the standard behavior.
I already tried working with bootstrap 4, cfr. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh3UAetYkUI&feature=youtu.be, but they don't seem to work together well.
My code: https://jsfiddle.net/rjtpvhn1/1/
HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="styles.css">
</head>
<body>
<div class="content">
<div class="split a">text left</div>
<div class="split b">text right</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS:
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
margin: 0;
height: 100vh;
font-size: 20px;
}
.content {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-items: center;
align-items: center;
}
.split {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
padding: 30px;
border: 1px solid;
overflow: auto;
}
.gutter {
cursor: e-resize;
height: 100%;
background: url(https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RickStrahl/jquery-resizable/master/assets/vsizegrip.png) center center no-repeat #ccc;
}
JAVASCRIPT: (include https://unpkg.com/split.js/dist/split.min.js)
Split(['.a', '.b'], {
gutterSize: 9,
sizes: [50, 50]
});
UPDATED The white bar is still there, however, the white bar is smaller and so is the image (the image is within the white bar) and the white bar stretches across the whole page. The white bar is above the particles.js and its background.
HTML:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link href='css/style.css' rel='stylesheet' type="text/css">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<center>
<img class='' src='img/kaylumlogo.png'></img>
</center>
</div>
<div id="particles-js"></div>
<script src="http://cdn.jsdelivr.net/particles.js/2.0.0/particles.min.js">
</script>
<script src="js/index.js">
</script>
</body>
</html>
CSS:
/* ---- reset ---- */
body {
margin: 0;
font: normal 75% Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
}
canvas {
display: block;
vertical-align: bottom;
}
/* ---- particles.js container ---- */
#particles-js {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: #b61924;
background-image: url("http://i.imgur.com/5F64MpH.jpg");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-position: 50% 50%;
}
#wrapper {
border: 0;
width: 200px;
}
img {
width: 200px;
}
Some of your tags are not close, some are closed incorrectly.
We always close a link tag within the tag with "/"
<link ... />
Same with images
<img ... /> instead of <img ... ></img>
I think "< center >" is deprecated.
With good semantic everything is possible.
It might solve your issue
http://jsbin.com/exUmaFU/1/edit
I love Windows 8, among many of the apps, and one of my favorites is the weather app.
Today I wanted to try making "horizontal page content" as seen on the weather app in the screenshot below.
I was trying to do this using DIV's and haven't any luck. I've tried various methods and whatever I tried using percents this didn't work. I reverted to using em with tables and I got the effect I wanted, but now my problem is getting the div's to have at least 90% width on page width.
Any help would be greatly appreciated as to how this effect can be accomplished.
Simplified Code:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Win 8 Horizontal Content Experiment</title>
<meta charset='utf-8'>
<meta content='width=device-width, height=device-height, minimum-scale=1.0, maximum-scale=1.0' name='viewport'>
<link rel='stylesheet' href='http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.3.1/jquery.mobile-1.3.1.min.css'>
<script src='http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.9.1.min.js' type='text/javascript'></script>
<script src='http://code.jquery.com/mobile/1.3.1/jquery.mobile-1.3.1.min.js' type='text/javascript'></script>
<style type="text/css">
body {
background: #000;
}
#contain {
display: inline-block;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: hidden;
overflow-x: scroll;
}
#contain table {
height: 100%;
}
#contain td {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border: 0px;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
}
/* Separate DIVS Inside Container */
#contain .box {
display: inline-block;
width: 80em;
height: 100%;
background: red;
color: #700;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="contain">
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<div class="box">
<center><h1>Page 1</h1></center>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="box">
<center><h1>Page 2</h1></center>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="box">
<center><h1>Page 3</h1></center>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="box">
<center><h1>Page 4</h1></center>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="box">
<center><h1>Page 5</h1></center>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div class="box">
<center><h1>Page 6</h1></center>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function() {
function scrollMenu(e) {
e = window.event || e;
var delta = Math.max(-1, Math.min(1, (e.wheelDelta || -e.detail)));
document.getElementById('contain').scrollLeft -= (delta*40); // Multiplied by 40
e.preventDefault();
}
if (document.getElementById('contain').addEventListener) {
// IE9, Chrome, Safari, Opera
document.getElementById('contain').addEventListener("mousewheel", scrollMenu, false);
// Firefox
document.getElementById('contain').addEventListener("DOMMouseScroll", scrollMenu, false);
} else {
// IE 6/7/8
document.getElementById('contain').attachEvent("onmousewheel", scrollMenu);
}
})();
</script>
</body>
</html>
Don't use tables. Use inline-block divs with width: 100% and height: 100% inside div with position: relative, white-space: nowrap (this will keep the boxes in one line) and width:100% and height:100%. Make sure you define html, body {width: 100%; height: 100%} in your styles.
I created a jsfiddle with what I think you wanted to do.
http://jsfiddle.net/taW4T/2/
I'm just starting to learn about jQuery and I believe I have run into a road block. Essentially what I have is a that represents a clickable area with an inside. So I'm trying to use this code:
$(document).ready(function(){
$('#side_menu_icon').click(function(){
$('#side_menu').slideToggle('slow');
});
});
Where #side_menu_icon is the clickable area and #side_menu is just a placeholder with width,height, and color temporarily. By default I've set this <div> to display:none; because the example I was looking at did the same thing, assuming the jQuery function would set it to visible. When I click the area nothing happens, I've tried attaching the #side_menu_icon to both the <img> and the <div>. I think there might be something I don't understand about the and how documents inherit the code from one another so I'll include that as well:
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style/main.css"></link>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/jquery-1.10.0.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="js/main.js"></script>
<title>Test Blog Site</title>
</head>
main.js is the file that calls the jQuery functions above.
Thanks for your time, I hope this is enough information for a solution.
EDIT:
Cut down version of HTML:
<body>
<div id="top_bar">
<h1 style="padding-left:1em;">Title</h1>
</div>
<div id="side_menu_icon">
<img src="images/side-menu-closed-15px.gif" />
</div>
<div id="side_menu">
</div>
<div id="post_holder">
<img style="margin-bottom:-5px" src="images/post-collection-top-transparent.gif" />
<div id="post_collection">
<!-- stuff -->
</div>
<img src="images/post-collection-bottom-transparent.gif" />
</div>
</body>
Relavent sections being
<div id="side_menu_icon">
<img src="images/side-menu-closed-15px.gif" />
</div>
and
<div id="side_menu">
</div>
CSS:
body {
font-family: "Courier New";
background-image: url("../images/background-1728x1080.jpg");
background-size:100%;
background-attachment:fixed;
margin: 0;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
width: auto;
height: auto;
outline-offset:0px;
}
h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,div,p{
padding:0;
margin:0;
}
.post{
width:90%;
padding-left: 5%;
}
#top_bar{
width: 100%;
z-index:99;
position: fixed;
font-size:15px;
background-image: url("../images/item-background.jpg");
background-size:6%;
color: white;
}
#side_menu_icon{
border: 4px solid #6e3b10;
margin-top: 50px;
position:fixed;
right:0;
background-image: url("../images/item-background.jpg");
}
#post_holder{
z-index:98;
text-align:center;
margin:0;
position:relative;
}
#post_collection{
background-image: url("../images/post-background.gif");
background-size: 100%;
max-width: 900px;
text-align:left;
margin: auto;
}
#side_menu{
height:500px;
width:100px;
background-color:yellow;
display:none;
}
Relevant parts being #side_menu and #side_menu_icon I guess.
I found the solution to my question, some of the CSS was disrupting jQuery's ability to work properly. I will just have to find some way around that.