Javascript inline scripts and defer scripts order of execution - javascript

I have a question about order of execution for mixed script type.
Here is my code :
<script>
if(document.documentMode) {
const firstScriptInDOM = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0];
const polyfill = document.createElement('script');
polyfill.src = "/static/js/polyfills/polyfills.js";
firstScriptInDOM.parentNode.insertBefore(polyfill, firstScriptInDOM);
}
</script>
<script src="static/js/lib1.js" defer></script>
<script src="static/js/lib2.js" defer></script>
<script src="static/js/lib3.js" defer></script>
<script src="static/js/myOwnScriptFile.js" defer></script>
The first script tag's purpose is to load polyfills for IE if the browser is IE.
Then it should load this other scripts and execute my code.
My question is : Will the polyfills script block execution of the defered scripts ?
Thanks a lot for you time !

scripts load synchronously unless specified to load asynchronously using the async attribute, what the defer attribute does is that it loads the script only after DOM is loaded. If you append a script dynamically, it will load asynchronously.
In you scenario,
This should be the chain of execution:
check polyfill script executes
lib1
lib2
lib3
myOwnScriptFile
polyfills (downloaded only after the parser has finished execution)
To ensure all your scripts load, in the order you want them too, you could dynamically load all scripts with something like :
check if the browser is IE:
IF IE
load polyfills, and load other scripts in the onload event of the polyfills script.
ELSE
load all other scripts

The script which is not deferred will run when it is parsed.
The other scripts will be executed after the document has been parsed in the order in which they appear in the document, before DOMContentLoaded is fired.
Update
Kaiido is correct and I was a wrong in my conclusion.
The part of your script that adds the polyfill will run first but the script it loads will run asynchronously, as soon as it downloads.
You can see more details here.
You can try using document.write instead.

Related

Is adding defer to a script tag at the end of a closing body tag redundant?

for example:
<body>
...all content is above the script...
<script src="https://foo/bar.js" defer></script>
</body>
Does it matter if we remove the defer from the script tag? By putting the script at the end of the body tag is already delaying the execution of the script so the above code should be the same as the following snippet right?
<body>
...all content is above the script...
<script src="https://foo/bar.js"></script>
</body>
According to Ben
The current best practice? Use deferred scripts in order in the head, unless you need to support older browsers (IE < 10, Opera Mini,
etc.) - 97.45% browser usage (ref)
Why? With defer, parsing finishes just like when we put the script at the end of the body tag, but overall the script execution finishes
well before, because the script has been downloaded in parallel with
the HTML parsing. This scenario will trigger the faster domInteractive
event that is used for page loading speed. With async, the order in
which your script will execute varies based on how fast the script is
fetched, so order can be compromised. Futhermore, async scripts are
executed inline and pause the parsing of the HTML.
Also from Mhmdrz_A
Browser will parse the document from top to bottom, hence putting the
scripts after all the main content will make the parser to reach that
later in time; which make the browser to download the script
later in time; The delay caused by putting the defer in the bottom is
absolutely non-sense, since the browser won't execute them (s) before (or during) HTML parser;
Thus it's better to let the browser load ( download ) them () as soon as possible, an have them available to execute as soon
as the all the main tasks are done.
Does it matter if we remove the defer from the script tag? By putting
the script at the end of the body tag is already delaying the
execution of the script so the above code should be the same as the
following snippet right?
Right you are! In this case, I'd say that there is no difference. As you correctly mention: the body tag is before the script, and that means it gets parsed first. Your html file has no idea there is any javascript until it has fully parsed the preceding code, and therefore defer does nothing.
Defer's only job is to run JavaScript after all the html has been parsed: see the MDN docs.
That said, with slightly different code, with say, another <script /> underneath is where the difference is found. That second (or more) <script /> tag will then begin to download in parallel (but executed in order). For example:
<script src="script1.js" />
<script src="script2.js" />
script1 is downloaded first, blocking script2 from downloading.
<script src="script1.js" defer />
<script src="script2.js" defer />
script1 is starts to download, then script2 also starts to download in parallel — but — script1 still gets executed in first, even if script2 finishes downloading first.
Further reading:
Detailed stackoverfow answer on script execution order in html
W3Schools description for <script /> (& it's attributes) in html
MDN docs on defer
Hope this helps!
Practically there will be no difference between these two.
Except that document.write (which shouldn't be used anyways) obviously is not allowed in defer.
Technically those are different. So the difference between a script having defer and one that does not, is that the one with defer is executed once the DOM is fully loaded, and the one without at the time where it is loaded.
This can make a difference if the client received the <script src="https://foo/bar.js" defer></script> tag, but the rest of the document is for some reason delayed due to whatever reason. The defer script can only execute if the complete response is sent.
But if that happens then you have other problems anyway.

What does "async" do when added in a javascript script tag? [duplicate]

There are so many different ways to include JavaScript in a html page. I know about the following options:
inline code or loaded from external URI
included in <head> or <body> tag [1,2]
having none, defer or async attribute (only external scripts)
included in static source or added dynamically by other scripts (at different parse states, with different methods)
Not counting browserscripts from the harddisk, javascript:URIs and onEvent-attributes [3], there are already 16 alternatives to get JS executed and I'm sure I forgot something.
I'm not so concerned with fast (parallel) loading, I'm more curious about the execution order (which may depend on loading order and document order). Is there a good (cross-browser) reference that covers really all cases? E.g. http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/defer/ only deals with 6 of them, and tests mostly old browsers.
As I fear there's not, here is my specific question: I've got some (external) head scripts for initialisation and script loading. Then I've got two static, inline scripts in the end of the body. The first one lets the script loader dynamically append another script element (referencing external js) to the body. The second of the static, inline scripts wants to use js from the added, external script. Can it rely on the other having been executed (and why :-)?
If you aren't dynamically loading scripts or marking them as defer or async, then scripts are loaded in the order encountered in the page. It doesn't matter whether it's an external script or an inline script - they are executed in the order they are encountered in the page. Inline scripts that come after external scripts are held until all external scripts that came before them have loaded and run.
Async scripts (regardless of how they are specified as async) load and run in an unpredictable order. The browser loads them in parallel and it is free to run them in whatever order it wants.
There is no predictable order among multiple async things. If one needed a predictable order, then it would have to be coded in by registering for load notifications from the async scripts and manually sequencing javascript calls when the appropriate things are loaded.
When a script tag is inserted dynamically, how the execution order behaves will depend upon the browser. You can see how Firefox behaves in this reference article. In a nutshell, the newer versions of Firefox default a dynamically added script tag to async unless the script tag has been set otherwise.
A script tag with async may be run as soon as it is loaded. In fact, the browser may pause the parser from whatever else it was doing and run that script. So, it really can run at almost any time. If the script was cached, it might run almost immediately. If the script takes awhile to load, it might run after the parser is done. The one thing to remember with async is that it can run anytime and that time is not predictable.
A script tag with defer waits until the entire parser is done and then runs all scripts marked with defer in the order they were encountered. This allows you to mark several scripts that depend upon one another as defer. They will all get postponed until after the document parser is done, but they will execute in the order they were encountered preserving their dependencies. I think of defer like the scripts are dropped into a queue that will be processed after the parser is done. Technically, the browser may be downloading the scripts in the background at any time, but they won't execute or block the parser until after the parser is done parsing the page and parsing and running any inline scripts that are not marked defer or async.
Here's a quote from that article:
script-inserted scripts execute asynchronously in IE and WebKit, but
synchronously in Opera and pre-4.0 Firefox.
The relevant part of the HTML5 spec (for newer compliant browsers) is here. There is a lot written in there about async behavior. Obviously, this spec doesn't apply to older browsers (or mal-conforming browsers) whose behavior you would probably have to test to determine.
A quote from the HTML5 spec:
Then, the first of the following options that describes the situation
must be followed:
If the element has a src attribute, and the element has a defer
attribute, and the element has been flagged as "parser-inserted", and
the element does not have an async attribute
The element must be added
to the end of the list of scripts that will execute when the document
has finished parsing associated with the Document of the parser that
created the element.
The task that the networking task source places on the task queue once
the fetching algorithm has completed must set the element's "ready to
be parser-executed" flag. The parser will handle executing the script.
If the element has a src attribute, and the element has been flagged
as "parser-inserted", and the element does not have an async attribute
The element is the pending parsing-blocking script of the Document of
the parser that created the element. (There can only be one such
script per Document at a time.)
The task that the networking task source places on the task queue once
the fetching algorithm has completed must set the element's "ready to
be parser-executed" flag. The parser will handle executing the script.
If the element does not have a src attribute, and the element has been
flagged as "parser-inserted", and the Document of the HTML parser or
XML parser that created the script element has a style sheet that is
blocking scripts The element is the pending parsing-blocking script of
the Document of the parser that created the element. (There can only
be one such script per Document at a time.)
Set the element's "ready to be parser-executed" flag. The parser will
handle executing the script.
If the element has a src attribute, does not have an async attribute,
and does not have the "force-async" flag set The element must be added
to the end of the list of scripts that will execute in order as soon
as possible associated with the Document of the script element at the
time the prepare a script algorithm started.
The task that the networking task source places on the task queue once
the fetching algorithm has completed must run the following steps:
If the element is not now the first element in the list of scripts
that will execute in order as soon as possible to which it was added
above, then mark the element as ready but abort these steps without
executing the script yet.
Execution: Execute the script block corresponding to the first script
element in this list of scripts that will execute in order as soon as
possible.
Remove the first element from this list of scripts that will execute
in order as soon as possible.
If this list of scripts that will execute in order as soon as possible
is still not empty and the first entry has already been marked as
ready, then jump back to the step labeled execution.
If the element has a src attribute The element must be added to the
set of scripts that will execute as soon as possible of the Document
of the script element at the time the prepare a script algorithm
started.
The task that the networking task source places on the task queue once
the fetching algorithm has completed must execute the script block and
then remove the element from the set of scripts that will execute as
soon as possible.
Otherwise The user agent must immediately execute the script block,
even if other scripts are already executing.
What about Javascript module scripts, type="module"?
Javascript now has support for module loading with syntax like this:
<script type="module">
import {addTextToBody} from './utils.mjs';
addTextToBody('Modules are pretty cool.');
</script>
Or, with src attribute:
<script type="module" src="http://somedomain.com/somescript.mjs">
</script>
All scripts with type="module" are automatically given the defer attribute. This downloads them in parallel (if not inline) with other loading of the page and then runs them in order, but after the parser is done.
Module scripts can also be given the async attribute which will run inline module scripts as soon as possible, not waiting until the parser is done and not waiting to run the async script in any particular order relative to other scripts.
There's a pretty useful timeline chart that shows fetch and execution of different combinations of scripts, including module scripts here in this article: Javascript Module Loading.
A great summary by #addyosmani
Shamelessly copied from https://addyosmani.com/blog/script-priorities/
The browser will execute the scripts in the order it finds them. If you call an external script, it will block the page until the script has been loaded and executed.
To test this fact:
// file: test.php
sleep(10);
die("alert('Done!');");
// HTML file:
<script type="text/javascript" src="test.php"></script>
Dynamically added scripts are executed as soon as they are appended to the document.
To test this fact:
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<title>Test</title>
</head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
var s = document.createElement('script');
s.type = "text/javascript";
s.src = "link.js"; // file contains alert("hello!");
document.body.appendChild(s);
alert("appended");
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
alert("final");
</script>
</body>
</html>
Order of alerts is "appended" -> "hello!" -> "final"
If in a script you attempt to access an element that hasn't been reached yet (example: <script>do something with #blah</script><div id="blah"></div>) then you will get an error.
Overall, yes you can include external scripts and then access their functions and variables, but only if you exit the current <script> tag and start a new one.
After testing many options I've found that the following simple solution is loading the dynamically loaded scripts in the order in which they are added in all modern browsers
loadScripts(sources) {
sources.forEach(src => {
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.src = src;
script.async = false; //<-- the important part
document.body.appendChild( script ); //<-- make sure to append to body instead of head
});
}
loadScripts(['/scr/script1.js','src/script2.js'])
I had trouble understanding how to get an embedded module-script to execute before the onload event happens. The answers above helped a lot but let me add a partial answer about what fixed my particular problem of misunderstanding the "Load and execute order of scripts".
I first used ... which caused an odd problem that it worked when loading the page normally, but not when running it in debugger on FireFox. That made debugging very difficult.
Note: Scripts whose type is "module" always have an implicit "deferred" attribute which means they don't stop the parsing of html, which means the onload-event can happen before the script gets executed. I did not want that. But I did want to use type="module" to make my un-exported JavaScript functions and variables invisible to other scripts on the same page.
I tried different options but thanks to the above answers I gained the insight that if you add the async -attribute to a script of type module it means that the script loads asynchronously BUT once it is loaded it executes immediately.
But in my case this was a script embedded in an HTML page. THEREFORE it meant nothing needed to load "asynchronously". It was already loaded with the page, since it was embedded in it. Therefore it with this change did get executed immediately -- which is what I wanted.
So I think it is worthwhile to point out this specific case because it is somewhat counter-intuitive: To get an embedded script executed IMMEDIATELY you must add the ASYNC attribute to its tag.
Ordinarily one might think that "async" means something happens asynchronously, in indeterminate order, not immediately. But the thing to realize is that "async" causes asynchronous LOADING, but immediate EXECUTION after the loading is complete. And when the script is embedded, no loading needs to be done, and therefore you get immediate execution.
Summary: Use
<script type="module" async> ... </script>
to get a module-script embedded to an HTML-page to execute immediately.
Perfect match for your query!
If none of the solutions worked for you then please refer to the below solution of mine which I have developed from my side.
I was also looking for the solution but after searching a lot, I summarized my code as below which is working perfectly for me!!
This is useful when you want functionality such that after previous script has fully loaded then and then only load next script!
just create a file named jsLoadScripts.js and insert it into the head or at the bottom of the body.
//From Shree Aum Software Solutions
//aumsoftwaresolutions#gmail.com
//script incrementor for array
scriptIncrementor = 0;
//define your script urls here
let scripts = [
"https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.5.1/jquery.min.js",
"jsGlobalFunctions.js",
"jsDateParser.js",
"jsErrorLogger.js",
"jsGlobalVariables.js",
"jsAjaxCalls.js",
"jsFieldsValidator.js",
"jsTableClickEvent.js",
"index.js",
"jsOnDocumentReady.js",
];
//it starts with the first script and then adds event listener to it. which will load another script on load of it. then this chain goes on and on by adding dynamic event listeners to the next scripts!
function initializeScripts() {
var script = document.createElement("script");
script.type = "text/javascript";
script.src = scripts[scriptIncrementor];
document.head.appendChild(script);
script.addEventListener("load", function () {
loadNextScript();
scriptIncrementor++;
});
}
// this function adds event listener to the scripts passed to it and does not allow next script load until previous one has been loaded!
function loadNextScript() {
if (scriptIncrementor != scripts.length - 1) {
var script = document.createElement("script");
script.type = "text/javascript";
script.src = scripts[scriptIncrementor + 1];
document.head.appendChild(script);
script.addEventListener("load", function () {
loadNextScript();
scriptIncrementor++;
});
}
}
// start fetching your scripts
window.onload = function () {
initializeScripts();
};
This may cause you some speed related issues so, you can call function initializeScripts() with your custom needs!

javascripts aren't executed sequentially in modern browser?

I know that in general, the scripts are loaded and executed in the order. But I have a problem that they are not executed in the right order, sometime the second script is executed and then the first script.
I am using jsp and tile. In the jsp template, I only load the common js files and then load specific js files for specific tile
It seems like browser loads and executes the scripts asynchronously
How to force it to load and execute scripts sequentially?
I've searched a lot of places for the answer but not work.
Template:
<html>
<head>
<title></title>
//load common js files
</head>
<body>
<tiles:insert attribute="header"/>
<tiles:insert attribute="content"/>
<tiles:insert attribute="footer"/>
</body>
</html>
Specific tile:
<div>
Test
</div>
//load js files
<script type="text/javascript" src="1.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="3.js"></script>
Edit:
These javascript files are very simple, they just print out number 1,2 and 3
But sometime It prints the wrong order.
The "content" div will be replaced by the tile and I don't know whether it is a type of loading resource dynamically: Dynamically loading JavaScript synchronously
There is a great article on html5rocks about script loading.
http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/speed/script-loading/
the simplest way would be to use defer but it's not supported by IED<10 and opera mini.
<script src="//other-domain.com/1.js" defer></script>
<script src="2.js" defer></script>
Spec says: Download together, execute in order just before
DOMContentLoaded. Ignore “defer” on scripts without “src”.
IE < 10 says: I might execute 2.js halfway through the execution of 1.js. Isn’t that fun??
The ultimate solution but less supported would a combination of dynamic inclusion and forcing async attribute to false.
[
'1.js',
'2.js'
].forEach(function(src) {
var script = document.createElement('script');
script.src = src;
script.async = false;
document.head.appendChild(script);
});
it requires a work around using onreadystatechange on IE<10

How to defer parsing barebone javascript in liferay (if possible) [duplicate]

I have a few <script> elements, and the code in some of them depend on code in other <script> elements. I saw the defer attribute can come in handy here as it allows code blocks to be postponed in execution.
To test it I executed this on Chrome: http://jsfiddle.net/xXZMN/.
<script defer="defer">alert(2);</script>
<script>alert(1)</script>
<script defer="defer">alert(3);</script>
However, it alerts 2 - 1 - 3. Why doesn't it alert 1 - 2 - 3?
A few snippets from the HTML5 spec: http://w3c.github.io/html/semantics-scripting.html#element-attrdef-script-async
The defer and async attributes must
not be specified if the src attribute
is not present.
There are three possible modes that
can be selected using these
attributes [async and defer]. If the async attribute is
present, then the script will be
executed asynchronously, as soon as it
is available. If the async attribute
is not present but the defer attribute
is present, then the script is
executed when the page has finished
parsing. If neither attribute is
present, then the script is fetched
and executed immediately, before the
user agent continues parsing the page.
The exact processing details for these
attributes are, for mostly historical
reasons, somewhat non-trivial,
involving a number of aspects of HTML.
The implementation requirements are
therefore by necessity scattered
throughout the specification. The
algorithms below (in this section)
describe the core of this processing,
but these algorithms reference and are
referenced by the parsing rules for
script start and end tags in HTML, in
foreign content, and in XML, the rules
for the document.write() method, the
handling of scripting, etc.
If the element has a src attribute,
and the element has a defer attribute,
and the element has been flagged as
"parser-inserted", and the element
does not have an async attribute:
The element must be added to the end of the list of scripts that will
execute when the document has finished
parsing associated with the Document
of the parser that created the
element.
The real answer is: Because you cannot trust defer.
In concept, defer and async differ as follows:
async allows the script to be downloaded in the background without blocking. Then, the moment it finishes downloading, rendering is blocked and that script executes. Render resumes when the script has executed.
defer does the same thing, except claims to guarantee that scripts execute in the order they were specified on the page, and that they will be executed after the document has finished parsing. So, some scripts may finish downloading then sit and wait for scripts that downloaded later but appeared before them.
Unfortunately, due to what is really a standards cat fight, defer's definition varies spec to spec, and even in the most recent specs doesn't offer a useful guarantee. As answers here and this issue demonstrate, browsers implement defer differently:
In certain situations some browsers have a bug that causes defer scripts to run out of order.
Some browsers delay the DOMContentLoaded event until after the defer scripts have loaded, and some don't.
Some browsers obey defer on <script> elements with inline code and without a src attribute, and some ignore it.
Fortunately the spec does at least specify that async overrides defer. So you can treat all scripts as async and get a wide swath of browser support like so:
<script defer async src="..."></script>
98% of browsers in use worldwide and 99% in the US will avoid blocking with this approach.
(If you need to wait until the document has finished parsing, listen to the event DOMContentLoaded event or use jQuery's handy .ready() function. You'd want to do this anyway to fall back gracefully on browsers that don't implement defer at all.)
UPDATED: 2/19/2016
Consider this answer outdated. Refer to other answers on this post for information relevant to newer browser version.
Basically, defer tells the browser to wait "until it's ready" before executing the javascript in that script block. Usually this is after the DOM has finished loading and document.readyState == 4
The defer attribute is specific to internet explorer. In Internet Explorer 8, on Windows 7 the result I am seeing in your JS Fiddle test page is, 1 - 2 - 3.
The results may vary from browser to browser.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms533719(v=vs.85).aspx
Contrary to popular belief IE follows standards more often than people let on, in actuality the "defer" attribute is defined in the DOM Level 1 spec http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1/level-one-html.html
The W3C's definition of defer: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/scripts.html#adef-defer:
"When set, this boolean attribute provides a hint to the user agent that the script is not going to generate any document content (e.g., no "document.write" in javascript) and thus, the user agent can continue parsing and rendering."
defer can only be used in <script> tag for external script inclusion. Hence it is advised to be used in the <script>-tags in the <head>-section.
As defer attribute works only with scripts tag with src. Found a way to mimic defer for inline scripts. Use DOMContentLoaded event.
<script defer src="external-script.js"></script>
<script>
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function(event) {
// Your inline scripts which uses methods from external-scripts.
});
</script>
This is because, DOMContentLoaded event fires after defer attributed scripts are completely loaded.
The defer attribute is only for external scripts (should only be used if the src attribute is present).
Have a look at this excellent article Deep dive into the murky waters of script loading by the Google developer Jake Archibald written in 2013.
Quoting the relevant section from that article:
Defer
<script src="//other-domain.com/1.js" defer></script>
<script src="2.js" defer></script>
Spec says: Download together, execute in order just before DOMContentLoaded. Ignore “defer” on scripts without “src”.
IE < 10 says: I might execute 2.js halfway through the execution of 1.js. Isn’t that fun??
The browsers in red say: I have no idea what this “defer” thing is, I’m going to load the scripts as if it weren’t there.
Other browsers say: Ok, but I might not ignore “defer” on scripts without “src”.
(I'll add that early versions of Firefox trigger DOMContentLoaded before the defer scripts finish running, according to this comment.)
Modern browsers seem to support async properly, but you need to be OK with scripts running out of order and possibly before DOMContentLoaded.
Should be also noted that there might be problems in IE<=9 when using script defer in certain situations. More on this: https://github.com/h5bp/lazyweb-requests/issues/42
<script defer> -
As soon as the browser interacts with the script tag with defer
It starts fetching the script file while also parsing the HTML side-by-side.
In this case, the script is only executed once the HTML parsing is completed.
<script async> —
As soon as the browser interacts a script tag with async
It starts fetching the script file while parsing the HTML side-by-side.
But stops the HTML parsing when the script is completely fetched, after which it starts executing the script, post which the HTML parsing continues.
<script> —
As soon as the browser interacts with a script tag
It stops the parsing of HTML, fetches the script file,
In this case, executes the script, and then continues the parsing of HTML.
This Boolean attribute is set to indicate to a browser that the script is meant to be executed after the document has been parsed. Since this feature hasn't yet been implemented by all other major browsers, authors should not assume that the script’s execution will actually be deferred. Never call document.write() from a defer script (since Gecko 1.9.2, this will blow away the document). The defer attribute shouldn't be used on scripts that don't have the src attribute. Since Gecko 1.9.2, the defer attribute is ignored on scripts that don't have the src attribute. However, in Gecko 1.9.1 even inline scripts are deferred if the defer attribute is set.
defer works with chrome , firefox , ie > 7 and Safari
ref: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/HTML/Element/script
The defer attribute is a boolean attribute.
When present, it specifies that the script is executed when the page has finished parsing.
Note: The defer attribute is only for external scripts (should only be used if the src attribute is present).
Note: There are several ways an external script can be executed:
If async is present: The script is executed asynchronously with the rest of the page (the script will be executed while the page continues the parsing)
If async is not present and defer is present: The script is executed when the page has finished parsing
If neither async or defer is present: The script is fetched and executed immediately, before the browser continues parsing the page

Where should I put <script> tags in HTML markup?

When embedding JavaScript in an HTML document, where is the proper place to put the <script> tags and included JavaScript? I seem to recall that you are not supposed to place these in the <head> section, but placing at the beginning of the <body> section is bad, too, since the JavaScript will have to be parsed before the page is rendered completely (or something like that). This seems to leave the end of the <body> section as a logical place for <script> tags.
So, where is the right place to put the <script> tags?
(This question references this question, in which it was suggested that JavaScript function calls should be moved from <a> tags to <script> tags. I'm specifically using jQuery, but more general answers are also appropriate.)
Here's what happens when a browser loads a website with a <script> tag on it:
Fetch the HTML page (e.g. index.html)
Begin parsing the HTML
The parser encounters a <script> tag referencing an external script file.
The browser requests the script file. Meanwhile, the parser blocks and stops parsing the other HTML on your page.
After some time the script is downloaded and subsequently executed.
The parser continues parsing the rest of the HTML document.
Step #4 causes a bad user experience. Your website basically stops loading until you've downloaded all scripts. If there's one thing that users hate it's waiting for a website to load.
Why does this even happen?
Any script can insert its own HTML via document.write() or other DOM manipulations. This implies that the parser has to wait until the script has been downloaded and executed before it can safely parse the rest of the document. After all, the script could have inserted its own HTML in the document.
However, most JavaScript developers no longer manipulate the DOM while the document is loading. Instead, they wait until the document has been loaded before modifying it. For example:
<!-- index.html -->
<html>
<head>
<title>My Page</title>
<script src="my-script.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="user-greeting">Welcome back, user</div>
</body>
</html>
JavaScript:
// my-script.js
document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() {
// this function runs when the DOM is ready, i.e. when the document has been parsed
document.getElementById("user-greeting").textContent = "Welcome back, Bart";
});
Because your browser does not know my-script.js isn't going to modify the document until it has been downloaded and executed, the parser stops parsing.
Antiquated recommendation
The old approach to solving this problem was to put <script> tags at the bottom of your <body>, because this ensures the parser isn't blocked until the very end.
This approach has its own problem: the browser cannot start downloading the scripts until the entire document is parsed. For larger websites with large scripts and stylesheets, being able to download the script as soon as possible is very important for performance. If your website doesn't load within 2 seconds, people will go to another website.
In an optimal solution, the browser would start downloading your scripts as soon as possible, while at the same time parsing the rest of your document.
The modern approach
Today, browsers support the async and defer attributes on scripts. These attributes tell the browser it's safe to continue parsing while the scripts are being downloaded.
async
<script src="path/to/script1.js" async></script>
<script src="path/to/script2.js" async></script>
Scripts with the async attribute are executed asynchronously. This means the script is executed as soon as it's downloaded, without blocking the browser in the meantime.
This implies that it's possible that script 2 is downloaded and executed before script 1.
According to http://caniuse.com/#feat=script-async, 97.78% of all browsers support this.
defer
<script src="path/to/script1.js" defer></script>
<script src="path/to/script2.js" defer></script>
Scripts with the defer attribute are executed in order (i.e. first script 1, then script 2). This also does not block the browser.
Unlike async scripts, defer scripts are only executed after the entire document has been loaded.
(To learn more and see some really helpful visual representations of the differences between async, defer and normal scripts check the first two links at the references section of this answer)
Conclusion
The current state-of-the-art is to put scripts in the <head> tag and use the async or defer attributes. This allows your scripts to be downloaded ASAP without blocking your browser.
The good thing is that your website should still load correctly on the 2% of browsers that do not support these attributes while speeding up the other 98%.
References
async vs defer attributes
Efficiently load JavaScript with defer and async
Remove Render-Blocking JavaScript
Async, Defer, Modules: A Visual Cheatsheet
Just before the closing body tag, as stated on Put Scripts at the Bottom:
Put Scripts at the Bottom
The problem caused by scripts is that they block parallel downloads. The HTTP/1.1 specification suggests that browsers download no more than two components in parallel per hostname. If you serve your images from multiple hostnames, you can get more than two downloads to occur in parallel. While a script is downloading, however, the browser won't start any other downloads, even on different hostnames.
Non-blocking script tags can be placed just about anywhere:
<script src="script.js" async></script>
<script src="script.js" defer></script>
<script src="script.js" async defer></script>
async script will be executed asynchronously as soon as it is available
defer script is executed when the document has finished parsing
async defer script falls back to the defer behavior if async is not supported
Such scripts will be executed asynchronously/after document ready, which means you cannot do this:
<script src="jquery.js" async></script>
<script>jQuery(something);</script>
<!--
* might throw "jQuery is not defined" error
* defer will not work either
-->
Or this:
<script src="document.write(something).js" async></script>
<!--
* might issue "cannot write into document from an asynchronous script" warning
* defer will not work either
-->
Or this:
<script src="jquery.js" async></script>
<script src="jQuery(something).js" async></script>
<!--
* might throw "jQuery is not defined" error (no guarantee which script runs first)
* defer will work in sane browsers
-->
Or this:
<script src="document.getElementById(header).js" async></script>
<div id="header"></div>
<!--
* might not locate #header (script could fire before parser looks at the next line)
* defer will work in sane browsers
-->
Having said that, asynchronous scripts offer these advantages:
Parallel download of resources:
Browser can download stylesheets, images and other scripts in parallel without waiting for a script to download and execute.
Source order independence:
You can place the scripts inside head or body without worrying about blocking (useful if you are using a CMS). Execution order still matters though.
It is possible to circumvent the execution order issues by using external scripts that support callbacks. Many third party JavaScript APIs now support non-blocking execution. Here is an example of loading the Google Maps API asynchronously.
The standard advice, promoted by the Yahoo! Exceptional Performance team, is to put the <script> tags at the end of the document's <body> element so they don't block rendering of the page.
But there are some newer approaches that offer better performance, as described in this other answer of mine about the load time of the Google Analytics JavaScript file:
There are some great slides by Steve Souders (client-side performance expert) about:
Different techniques to load external JavaScript files in parallel
their effect on loading time and page rendering
what kind of "in progress" indicators the browser displays (e.g. 'loading' in the status bar, hourglass mouse cursor).
The modern approach is using ES6 'module' type scripts.
<script type="module" src="..."></script>
By default, modules are loaded asynchronously and deferred. i.e. you can place them anywhere and they will load in parallel and execute when the page finishes loading.
Further reading:
The differences between a script and a module
The execution of a module being deferred compared to a script(Modules are deferred by default)
Browser Support for ES6 Modules
If you are using jQuery then put the JavaScript code wherever you find it best and use $(document).ready() to ensure that things are loaded properly before executing any functions.
On a side note: I like all my script tags in the <head> section as that seems to be the cleanest place.
<script src="myjs.js"></script>
</body>
The script tag should always be used before the body close or at the bottom in HTML file.
The Page will load with HTML and CSS and later JavaScript will load.
Check this if required:
http://stevesouders.com/hpws/rule-js-bottom.php
The best place to put <script> tag is before closing </body> tag, so the downloading and executing it doesn't block the browser to parse the HTML in document,
Also loading the JavaScript files externally has its own advantages like it will be cached by browsers and can speed up page load times, it separates the HTML and JavaScript code and help to manage the code base better.
But modern browsers also support some other optimal ways, like async and defer to load external JavaScript files.
Async and Defer
Normally HTML page execution starts line by line. When an external JavaScript <script> element is encountered, HTML parsing is stopped until a JavaScript is download and ready for execution. This normal page execution can be changed using the defer and async attribute.
Defer
When a defer attribute is used, JavaScript is downloaded parallelly with HTML parsing, but it will be execute only after full HTML parsing is done.
<script src="/local-js-path/myScript.js" defer></script>
Async
When the async attribute is used, JavaScript is downloaded as soon as the script is encountered and after the download, it will be executed asynchronously (parallelly) along with HTML parsing.
<script src="/local-js-path/myScript.js" async></script>
When to use which attributes
If your script is independent of other scripts and is modular, use async.
If you are loading script1 and script2 with async, both will run
parallelly along with HTML parsing, as soon as they are downloaded
and available.
If your script depends on another script then use defer for both:
When script1 and script2 are loaded in that order with defer, then script1 is guaranteed to execute first,
Then script2 will execute after script1 is fully executed.
Must do this if script2 depends on script1.
If your script is small enough and is depended by another script
of type async then use your script with no attributes and place it above all the async scripts.
Reference: External JavaScript JS File – Advantages, Disadvantages, Syntax, Attributes
It turns out it can be everywhere.
You can defer the execution with something like jQuery so it doesn't matter where it's placed (except for a small performance hit during parsing).
The most conservative (and widely accepted) answer is "at the bottom just before the ending tag", because then the entire DOM will have been loaded before anything can start executing.
There are dissenters, for various reasons, starting with the available practice to intentionally begin execution with a page onload event.
It depends. If you are loading a script that's necessary to style your page / using actions in your page (like click of a button) then you better place it at the top. If your styling is 100% CSS and you have all fallback options for the button actions then you can place it at the bottom.
Or the best thing (if that's not a concern) is you can make a modal loading box, place your JavaScript code at the bottom of your page and make it disappear when the last line of your script gets loaded. This way you can avoid users using actions in your page before the scripts are loaded. And also avoid the improper styling.
Including scripts at the end is mainly used where the content/ styles of the web page is to be shown first.
Including the scripts in the head loads the scripts early and can be used before the loading of the whole web page.
If the scripts are entered at last the validation will happen only after the loading of the entire styles and design which is not appreciated for fast responsive websites.
You can add JavaScript code in an HTML document by employing the dedicated HTML tag <script> that wraps around JavaScript code.
The <script> tag can be placed in the <head> section of your HTML, in the <body> section, or after the </body> close tag, depending on when you want the JavaScript to load.
Generally, JavaScript code can go inside of the document <head> section in order to keep them contained and out of the main content of your HTML document.
However, if your script needs to run at a certain point within a page’s layout — like when using document.write to generate content — you should put it at the point where it should be called, usually within the <body> section.
Depending on the script and its usage the best possible (in terms of page load and rendering time) may be to not use a conventional <script>-tag per se, but to dynamically trigger the loading of the script asynchronously.
There are some different techniques, but the most straightforward is to use document.createElement("script") when the window.onload event is triggered. Then the script is loaded first when the page itself has rendered, thus not impacting the time the user has to wait for the page to appear.
This naturally requires that the script itself is not needed for the rendering of the page.
For more information, see the post Coupling async scripts by Steve Souders (creator of YSlow, but now at Google).
Script blocks DOM load until it's loaded and executed.
If you place scripts at the end of <body>, all of the DOM has a chance to load and render (the page will "display" faster). <script> will have access to all of those DOM elements.
On the other hand, placing it after the <body> start or above will execute the script (where there still aren't any DOM elements).
You are including jQuery which means you can place it wherever you wish and use .ready().
You can place most of <script> references at the end of <body>.
But if there are active components on your page which are using external scripts, then their dependency (.js files) should come before that (ideally in the head tag).
The best place to write your JavaScript code is at the end of the document after or right before the </body> tag to load the document first and then execute the JavaScript code.
<script> ... your code here ... </script>
</body>
And if you write in jQuery, the following can be in the head document and it will execute after the document loads:
<script>
$(document).ready(function(){
// Your code here...
});
</script>
If you still care a lot about support and performance in Internet Explorer before version 10, it's best to always make your script tags the last tags of your HTML body. That way, you're certain that the rest of the DOM has been loaded and you won't block and rendering.
If you don't care too much any more about in Internet Explorer before version 10, you might want to put your scripts in the head of your document and use defer to ensure they only run after your DOM has been loaded (<script type="text/javascript" src="path/to/script1.js" defer></script>). If you still want your code to work in Internet Explorer before version 10, don't forget to wrap your code in a window.onload even, though!
I think it depends on the webpage execution.
If the page that you want to display can not displayed properly without loading JavaScript first then you should include the JavaScript file first.
But if you can display/render a webpage without initially download JavaScript file, then you should put JavaScript code at the bottom of the page. Because it will emulate a speedy page load, and from a user's point of view, it would seems like that the page is loading faster.
Always, we have to put scripts before the closing body tag expect some specific scenario.
For Example :
`<html> <body> <script> document.getElementById("demo").innerHTML = "Hello JavaScript!"; </script> </body> </html>`
Prefer to put it before the </body> closing tag.
Why?
As per the official doc: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Learn/Getting_started_with_the_web/JavaScript_basics#a_hello_world!_example
Note: The reason the instructions (above) place the element
near the bottom of the HTML file is that the browser reads code in the
order it appears in the file.
If the JavaScript loads first and it is supposed to affect the HTML
that hasn't loaded yet, there could be problems. Placing JavaScript
near the bottom of an HTML page is one way to accommodate this
dependency. To learn more about alternative approaches, see Script
loading strategies.

Categories