We Keep Coding

How to sum a given number and it's reverse number in javaScript

const reversedNum = num =>
parseFloat(num.toString().split('').reverse().join('')) * Math.sign(num)
console.log(reversedNum(456))
Couldn't figure it out how to write code in order to sum 654 + 456
Thank You very much!

const reversedNum = num => num + +num.toString().split('').reverse().join('')

You can return sum of num and reversedNum inside a function.
const sumOfNumAndReversedNum= num => {
const reversedNum = parseFloat(num.toString().split('').reverse().join('')) * Math.sign(num)
return num + reversedNum
}
let userNumber = 456
console.log(sumOfNumAndReversedNum(userNumber))

You can write a more performant way of reversing the number than turning it into a string, flipping it, and turning it back into an integer.
One option is to go through the number backwards by popping off the last integer (e.g., 123 % 10 === 3) and adding it to your newly reversed number. You'll also need to multiply your reversed number by 10 in each iteration to move you to the next degree.
For example, given the number 123:
123 % 10 = 3;
123 /= 10 = 12;
0 * 10 + 3 = 3;
1 % 10 = 2;
12 /= 10 = 1;
3 * 10 + 2 = 32
1 % 10 = 1;
1 /= 10 = 0;
32 * 10 + 1 = 321
This method will also automatically take care of negative numbers for you, leaving you something like:
function reverse(num) {
let reversed = 0;
while (num !== 0) {
const popped = num % 10;
num = parseInt(num / 10);
if (reversed > Number.MAX_VALUE / 10 || (reversed === Number.MAX_VALUE / 10 && popped > 7)) return 0;
if (reversed < Number.MIN_VALUE / 10 || (reversed === Number.MIN_VALUE / 10 && popped < -8)) return 0;
reversed = reversed * 10 + popped;
}
return reversed;
}
Now you can simply call:
console.log(123 + reverse(123))

const reversedNum = num =>
Number(num.toString().split('').reverse().join(''))
console.log(reversedNum(456))
Do it!

Fibonacci sequence generator not working for 1 or 2 as inputs but it works for the rest of the sequence?

Can someone explain to me why my fibonacciGenerator function doesn't work with this code? I understand why it works with the second code tho but I just don't get why the first one doesn't.
function fibonacciGenerator(n) {
if (n > 0) {
var fArray = [];
fArray.push(0);
if (n >= 2) {
fArray.push(1);
}
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
fArray.push(fArray[i] + fArray[i + 1]);
}
console.log(fArray);
}
}
fibonacciGenerator(1);
fibonacciGenerator(2);
Second code working :
function fibonacciGenerator(n) {
if (n > 0) {
var fArray = [];
fArray.push(0);
if (n >= 2) {
fArray.push(1);
}
for (var i = 2; i < n; i++) {
fArray.push(fArray[i - 1] + fArray[i - 2]);
}
console.log(fArray);
}
}
fibonacciGenerator(1);
fibonacciGenerator(2);

The first code is printing 2 extra Fibonacci number this is because:
you are first pushing 0 and 1 into the array as:
var fArray = [];
fArray.push(0);
if (n >=2 ){
fArray.push(1);
}
and then you loop over again till n times. Because of this reason it prints two extra Fibonacci numbers.
the solution is to either loop over n-2 time or to use the second code.

var fArray = [];
fArray.push(0);
if (n >= 2) {
fArray.push(1);
}
The initial condition is to cover n=1: [0] and n=2: [0,1]
The 2nd code is working because the loop only starts when n is greater than i, so means it skips the loop with n < 2.
For your problem, you don't skip the loop when n < 2.
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
fArray.push(fArray[i] + fArray[i + 1]);
}
You can imagine the result will be like below when n < 2 with your loop.
Note that the inital value is fArray = [0]
fArray.push(fArray[0] + fArray[1]); //fArray[1] is undefined because you only have 1 item in your array
In this case fArray[0] + fArray[1] ==> 0 + undefined = NaN
So that's why your logic does not work when n < 2
To correct it, you need to avoid the loop if n < 2
//if n=1 or n=2, it won't trigger the loop due to `i < n-2`
for (var i = 0; i < n-2; i++) {
fArray.push(fArray[i] + fArray[i + 1]);
}

The idea to have i start with 0 instead of 2, and to adjust the body of the loop accordingly, is fine, but there is one thing that the first version didn't adjust: the stop condition of the loop.
By setting i=0, the first version loops 2 times more than the second version. You should also alter the end condition in the same way: instead of i < n, it should have i < n - 2, so to ensure the number of iterations is the same as in the second version.
Not related to your question, but the console.log should better be placed outside of the function. The job of the function should be to return the array, not to print it. So also, when n > 0 is false, it should return an empty array.
function fibonacciGenerator(n) {
var fArray = [];
if (n > 0) {
fArray.push(0);
if (n >= 2) {
fArray.push(1);
}
for (var i = 0; i < n - 2; i++) {
fArray.push(fArray[i] + fArray[i + 1]);
}
}
return fArray;
}
console.log(fibonacciGenerator(1));
console.log(fibonacciGenerator(2));

First you have to identify the pattern.
Fibonacci series -> 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21
Term -> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0th term =0, 1st term =1
From the second term,
2nd = 1st term + 0th term = 1+0 = 1
3rd = 2nd term + 1st term = 1+1 = 2
4th = 3rd term + 2nd term = 2+1 = 3
5th = 4th term + 3rd term = 3+2 = 5
nth = (n-1) + (n-2)
since the first 2 terms are fixed, you have to start for loop from i= 2.
Also, according to the above shown pattern, you have to use following code inside the for loop.
fArray.push(fArray[i - 1] + fArray[i-2]);

Sum of odd numbers until reached limit in Javascript

While I was solving a question saying "add odd numbers from 1 to 20", I coded this:
var i, sum=0;
for (i=2; i<=20; i*2){
sum=sum+i;
}
document.write(sum);
When I launched it through a browser, it did not work. However, when I fixed i*2 into i+=2, it worked.
What am I missing? Am I not able to use *(multiplier) in For Loops?

If you need to add odd numbers from 1 to 20, then you need i+=2 as the third parameter of the for and need to initialize the variable to 1 to get the correct result:
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 1; i <= 20; i += 2) {
sum += i;
}
When you have
i += 2
2 is added to i and the result is stored into i. When you tried
var i, sum=0;
for (i=2; i<=20; i*2){
sum=sum+i;
}
i*2 calculates the value which is twice as big as i, but it will not change the value of i, so this would "work" instead:
var i, sum=0;
for (i=2; i<=20; i*=2){
sum=sum+i;
}
where
i *= 2
not only calculates the value twice as big as i, but stores the result into i as well. However, even though this will run, the result will not be correct, since you are using the wrong formula.
Also, you can calculate the result without using a for:
1 + 2 + ... + n = n * (n + 1) / 2
Assuming that n is pair: and since we know that we are "missing" half the numbers and all the pair numbers are bigger exactly with 1 than the previous impair numbers, we can subtract half of the sequence
n * (n + 1) / 2 - n / 2 = (n * (n + 1) - n) / 2 = (n * (n + 1 - 1)) /
2 = n * n / 2
and now we have exactly the double value of what we need, so the final formula is:
sum = n * n / 4;
Let's make this a function
function getOddSumUpTo(limit) {
if (limit % 2) limit ++;
return limit * limit / 4;
}
and then:
var sum = getOddSumUpTo(20);
Note that we increment limit if it is odd.

The issue is that you're not updating the value of the i in the for loop.
I want add odd numbers from 1 to 20
Then you need to change the initial value of i to 1.
var i, sum = 0;
for (i = 1; i <= 20; i += 2){
sum += i;
}
document.write(sum);
Also, you can find the sum of odd numbers from 1 to 20 by using a formula.
n = 20;
console.log(n % 2 == 0 ? (n * n)/ 4 : ((n + 1) * (n + 1))/4);

You can you just have to do it simillary to what you've written about sum.
You used there i += 2 and not i + 2.
The same way just change i * 2 to i *= 2.
Here is an working example
var i, sum = 0;
for (i = 2; i <= 20; i *= 2) {
console.log(i);
sum += i;
}
document.write(sum);
But a couple of things here.
First of all you wrote
add odd numbers from 1 to 20
and in all your examples you use sum on even numbers.
Secondly, by multiplying you will not achieve your desired goal (as you can see in a snippet above in a console)
So to actually
add odd numbers from 1 to 20
you should do it like this:
var i, sum = 0;
for (i = 1; i <= 20; i += 2) {
console.log(i);
sum += i;
}
document.write(sum);
EDIT
If you want to add even numbers you still can't use multiplying.
Why? Simply because you said yourself that you want a sum of numbers.
So let's say that we start with 2.
If we multiply it by 2 it has the value 4 which is fine.
But now look what happens in the next iteration. Our variable i which has the value 4 is multiplied by 2 and now its new value is 8. So what about 6?
Next iteration multiply 8 by 2 and its new value is 16.
Do you see where this is going?
And when you use i += 2 instead of i *= 2?
So if we start with 2 and than we add 2 its new value is 4.
In next iteration we add 2 to 4 and we have 6.
And so on.
If you want to test it, here is an example with multiplying and adding.
Pay attention to console logs
var i;
console.log("Multiplying");
for (i = 2; i <= 20; i *= 2) {
console.log("i value is: " + i);
}
console.log("Adding");
for (i = 2; i <= 20; i += 2) {
console.log("i value is: " + i);
}

What you are looking is this :
let sum = 0;
for(var i = 2; i <= 20; i += 2){
sum += i;
}
document.write(sum)
Another take on this :
// set to n (what you want). Set to n + 1
var N = 21;
// The main driver code create an array from 0-(N-1) and removes all even nums
let a = Array.apply(null, {length: N}).map(Number.call, _ => +_).filter(_=>_%2)
// console.log the array
console.log(a)

You can use whatever expression in loop header, even this is a valid for loop statement for (;;) which simply runs forever (equivalent to while(true)).
Problem is that you are not updating the i counter in for (i=2; i<=20; i*2) so the i will stays the same throughout the execution of the loop.
If you change it to for (i=2; i<=20; i = i*2) or for (i=2; i<=20; i *=2) then it will work.
It is the same as if you did
let i = 1;
i * 2;
console.log(i);
i = i * 2;
console.log(i);
The first i * 2 doesn't update the i while the second one does.
You can also translate the for loop into while loop to see the error more clearly.
// wrong
let i = 1;
while(i <= 20) {
i * 2;
// do something
}
// right
let i = 1;
while(i <= 20) {
i = i * 2 // or i *= 2
// do something
}
Just a side note, if you wanted to perform sum on more types of sequences efficiently than you could use a generator based approach and write your sum function and describe each type of a sequence with a generator function.
function *generateOdd(start, end) {
for (let i = start; i <= end; i++) {
if (i % 2 === 1) { yield i; }
}
}
function *generateEven(start, end) {
for (let i = start; i <= end; i++) {
if (i % 2 === 0) { yield i; }
}
}
function sumNums(gen, start, end) {
const generator = gen(start, end);
let res = 0;
let item = generator.next();
while (!item.done) {
res += item.value;
item = generator.next();
}
return res;
}
console.log(sumNums(generateOdd, 0, 20));
console.log(sumNums(generateEven, 0, 20));

/* sum of the Odd number using loop */
function sumOfOddNumbers(n){
let sum= 0;
for(let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
if(i % 2 !== 0){
sum = sum + i;
}
}
return sum;
}
// 567 = 1+3+5+7+9+11+13+15+17+19+21+23+25+27+29+31+33+35+37+39+41+43+45+47
let n = 47;
let sum = sumOfOddNumbers(47);
alert('sumOfOddNumbers(' + n + ') = ' + sum);

javaScript - Find the sum of all divisors of a given integer

i'm doing some coding exercises and i'm not being able to solve this one.
Find the sum of all divisors of a given integer.
For n = 12, the input should be
sumOfDivisors(n) = 28.
example: 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 6 + 12 = 28.
Constraints:
1 ≤ n ≤ 15.
how can i solve this exercise? i'm not being able to.
function(n){
var arr = [],
finalSum;
if(n <= 1 || n => 16){
return false ;
}
for(var i = 0; i < n; i++){
var tmp= n/2;
arr.push(tmp)
// i need to keep on dividing n but i can't get the way of how to
}
return finalSum;
}

This is another way to do it:
var divisors = n=>[...Array(n+1).keys()].slice(1)
.reduce((s, a)=>s+(!(n % a) && a), 0);
console.log(divisors(12));
JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/32n5jdnb/141/
Explaining:
n=> this is an arrow function, the equivalent to function(n) {. You don't need the () if there's only one parameter.
Array(n+1) creates an empty array of n+1 elements
.keys() gets the keys of the empty array (the indexes i.e. 0, 1, 2) so this is a way to create a numeric sequence
[...Array(n+1)].keys()] uses the spread (...) operator to transform the iterator in another array so creating an array with the numeric sequence
.slice(1) removes the first element thus creating a sequence starting with 1. Remember the n+1 ?
.reduce() is a method that iterates though each element and calculates a value in order to reduce the array to one value. It receives as parameter a callback function to calculate the value and the initial value of the calculation
(s, a)=> is the callback function for reduce. It's an arrow function equivalent to function(s, a) {
s+(!(n % a) && a) is the calculation of the value.
s+ s (for sum) or the last value calculated +
!(n % a) this returns true only for the elements that have a 0 as modular value.
(!(n % a) && a) is a js 'trick'. The case is that boolean expressions in javascript don't return true or false. They return a 'truthy' or 'falsy' value which is then converted to boolean. So the actual returned value is the right value for && (considering both have to be truthy) and the first thuthy value found for || (considering only one need to be truthy). So this basically means: if a is a modular value (i.e. != 0) return a to add to the sum, else return 0.
, 0 is the initial value for the reduce calculation.
Reduce documentation: https://developer.mozilla.org/pt-BR/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/Reduce
Edit
Answering to Tristan Forward:
var divisorsList = [];
var divisors = (n)=>[...Array(n+1).keys()].slice(1)
.reduce((s, a)=>{
var divisor = !(n % a) && a;
if (divisor) divisorsList.push(divisor);
return s+divisor;
}, 0);
console.log('Result:', divisors(12));
console.log('Divisors:', divisorsList);

You have to check if specified number is or not a divisor of given integer. You can use modulo % - if there's no rest, specified number is the divisor of the given integer - add it to the sum.
function sumDivisors(num){
var sum = 0;
for (var i = 1; i <= num; i++){
if (!(num % i)) {
sum += i;
}
}
console.log(sum);
}
sumDivisors(6);
sumDivisors(10);

Here is a solution with better algorithm performance (O(sqrt(largest prime factor of n)))
divisors = n => {
sum = 1
for (i = 2; n > 1; i++) {
i * i > n ? i = n : 0
b = 0
while (n % i < 1) {
c = sum * i
sum += c - b
b = c
n /= i
}
}
return sum
}

since n / i is also a devisor this can be done more efficiently.
function sumDivisors(num) {
let sum = 1;
for (let i = 2; i < num / i; i++) {
if (num % i === 0) {
sum += i + num / i;
}
}
const sqrt = Math.sqrt(num);
return num + (num % sqrt === 0 ? sum + sqrt : sum);
}

function countDivisors(n){
let counter = 1;
for(let i=1; i <= n/2; i++){
n % i === 0 ? counter++ : null;
}
return counter
}
in this case, we consider our counter as starting with 1 since by default all numbers are divisible by 1. Then we half the number since numbers that can be able to divide n are less or equal to half its value

rotate a matrix 45 degrees in javascript

given a matrix like this one:
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
which can be represented as a 2 dimensional array:
arr = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]];
rotate the array so that it is read diagonally at a 45 degree angle and prints out this:
1
4 2
7 5 3
8 6
9
I spent a while coming up with a solution that I don't even fully intuitively understand, but it works, at least for 3x3 and 4x4 matrices. I was hoping to see more logical and clean implementations.
Here's my solution:
arr = [[1,2,3,0],[4,5,6,0],[7,8,9,0], [0,0,0,0]];
// arr[i][j];
transform(arr);
function transform(ar) {
// the number of lines in our diagonal matrix will always be rows + columns - 1
var lines = ar.length + ar[0].length - 1;
// the length of the longest line...
var maxLen = ~~(ar.length + ar[0].length)/2;
var start = 1;
var lengths = [];
// this for loop creates an array of the lengths of each line, [1,2,3,2,1] in our case
for (i=0;i<lines; i++) {
lengths.push(start);
if (i+1 < maxLen) {
start++;
} else {
start--;
}
}
// after we make each line, we're going to append it to str
var str = "";
// for every line
for(j=0; j<lengths.length; j++) {
// make a new line
var line = "";
// i tried to do it all in one for loop but wasn't able to (idk if it's possible) so here we use a particular for loop while lengths of the lines are increasing
if (j < maxLen) {
// lengths[j] is equal to the elements in this line, so the for loop will run that many times and create that many elements
for(c=0; c<lengths[j]; c++) {
// if ar[r][c], the pattern here is that r increases along rows (as we add new lines), and decreases along columns. c stays the same as we add rows, and increases across columns
line += ar[lengths[j]-1-c][c] + " ";
// when we've added all the elements we need for this line, add it to str with a line break
if (c == lengths[j]-1) {
line += "\n"; str += line;
}
}
} else {
// when we're headed down or decreasing the length of each line
for (r=0; r<lengths[j]; r++) {
// the pattern here tripped me up, and I had to introduce another changing variable j-maxLen (or the distance from the center). r stays the same as rows increase and decreases across columns. c increases along rows and decreases across columns
line += ar[lengths[j]-r+j-maxLen][j-maxLen+r +1] + " ";
// that's all our elements, add the line to str;
if (r == lengths[j] -1) {
line += "\n"; str += line;
}
}
}
}
console.log(str);
}

The main idea is to partition the original matrix indexed by (i,j) according to i+j.
This is expressed in the code snippet rotated[i+j].push(arr[i][j]) below:
arr = [[1,2,3], [4,5,6], [7,8,9]];
var summax = arr.length + arr[0].length - 1; // max index of diagonal matrix
var rotated = []; // initialize to an empty matrix of the right size
for( var i=0 ; i<summax ; ++i ) rotated.push([]);
// Fill it up by partitioning the original matrix.
for( var j=0 ; j<arr[0].length ; ++j )
for( var i=0 ; i<arr.length ; ++i ) rotated[i+j].push(arr[i][j]);
// Print it out.
for( var i=0 ; i<summax ; ++i ) console.log(rotated[i].join(' '))
Output:
1
4 2
7 5 3
8 6
9
In Ruby
Produces same output:
puts arr.transpose.flatten.group_by.with_index { |_,k|
k.divmod(arr.size).inject(:+) }.values.map { |a| a.join ' ' }

function transform(ar) {
var result = [],
i, x, y, row;
for (i = 0; i < ar.length; i++) {
row = [];
for (x = 0, y = i; y >= 0; x++, y--) {
row.push(ar[y][x]);
}
result.push(row);
}
for (i = 1; i < ar[0].length; i++) {
row = [];
for (x = i, y = ar[0].length - 1; x < ar[0].length; x++, y--) {
row.push(ar[y][x]);
}
result.push(row);
}
return result;
}
This returns the rotated array, to print it out as you go just replace each result.push(row); line with console.log(row.join(" "));.

Here's my approach:
var origMatrix = [[1,2,3,4,5], [4,5,6,7,8], [9,10,11,12,13], [14,15,16,17,18], [19,20,21,22,23]];
var maxSize = origMatrix.length;//Presuming all internal are equal!
var rotatedMatrix = [];
var internalArray;
var keyX,keyY,keyArray;
for(var y=0;y<((maxSize * 2)-1);y++){
internalArray = [];
for(var x=0;x<maxSize;x++){
keyX = x;
keyY = y - x;
if(keyY > -1){
keyArray = origMatrix[keyY];
if(typeof(keyArray) != 'undefined' && typeof(keyArray[keyX]) != 'undefined'){
internalArray.push(keyArray[keyX]);
}
}
}
rotatedMatrix.push(internalArray);
}
//log results
for(var i=0;i<rotatedMatrix.length;i++){
console.log(rotatedMatrix[i]);
}
Here's a JSFiddle of it in action (open the Console to see the results)

The Idea: Walk the Diagonals and Clip
You could use the diagonal enumeration from Cantor, see Cantor pairing function,
which is used to show that the set N x N has the same cardinality as the set N (i.e. natural numbers can be mapped one to one to pairs of natural numbers) and combine it with a condition that one skips those values which lie outside the rectangular matrix.
The Cantor pairing function pi takes two natural numbers i and j, i.e. the pair (i, j) and maps it to a natural number k
pi : |N x |N -> |N : pi(i, j) = k
Use the reverse mapping to get this
pi^-1 : |N -> |N x |N : pi^-1(k) = (i, j)
i.e. one enumerates the cells of the "infinite Matrix" N x N diagonally.
So counting up k and applying the inverse function will give the proper pair of indices (i, j) for printing the rotated matrix.
Example:
0->(0, 0) 2->(0, 1) | 5->(0, 2) 9->(0, 3) . .
1->(1, 0) 4->(1, 1) | 8->(1, 2)
3->(2, 0) 7->(2, 2) |
---------------------+ <- clipping for 3 x 2 matrix
6->(3, 0)
.
.
Calculation of the Inverse Cantor Pair Function
For input k these formulas give the pair (i, j):
w = floor((sqrt(8*k + 1) - 1) / 2)
t = (w*w + w) / 2
j = k - t
i = w - j
See the link given above for a derivation.
Resulting Algorithm
Given a m x n matrix A: i from [0, .., m - 1] enumerates the rows, and j from [0, .., n - 1] enumerates the columns
Start at k = 0
calculate the corresponding index pair (i, j)
print the matrix value A[i, j] if the indices i and j lie within your matrix dimensions m and n
print a new line, once your i hit the top of the matrix, i.e. if i == 0
increment k
continue with step 2 until you arrived at the index pair (i, j) = (n - 1, n - 1)
Sample Implementation in JavaScript
Note: I tried this out in the MongoDB shell, using its print() function.
Helper functions
function sprint(k) {
var s = '' + k;
while (s.length < 3) {
s = ' ' + s;
}
return s;
}
function print_matrix(a) {
var m = a.row_size;
var n = a.column_size;
for (var i = 0; i < m; i++) {
var s = '';
for (var j = 0; j < n; j++) {
s += sprint(a.value[i][j]);
}
print(s);
}
}
The Inverse of the Cantor pairing function
// inverse of the Cantor pair function
function pi_inv(k) {
var w = Math.floor((Math.sqrt(8*k + 1) - 1) / 2);
var t = (w*w + w) /2;
var j = k - t;
var i = w -j;
return [i, j];
}
The algorithm
// "rotate" matrix a
function rot(a) {
var m = a.row_size;
var n = a.column_size;
var i_max = m - 1;
var j_max = n - 1;
var k = 0;
var s = '';
do {
var ij = pi_inv(k);
var i = ij[0];
var j = ij[1];
if ((i <= i_max) && (j <= j_max)) {
s += sprint(a.value[i][j]);
}
if (i == 0) {
print(s);
s = '';
}
k += 1
} while ((i != i_max) || (j != j_max));
print(s);
}
Example usage
// example
var a = {
row_size: 4,
column_size: 4,
value: [ [1, 2, 3, 4], [5, 6, 7, 8], [9, 10, 11, 12], [13, 14, 15, 16] ]
};
print('in:');
print_matrix(a);
print('out:');
rot(a);
Output for 4x4 Matrix
in:
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16
out:
1
5 2
9 6 3
13 10 7 4
14 11 8
15 12
16
This method works for any m x n Matrix, e.g. 4 x 5:
in:
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20
out:
1
6 2
11 7 3
16 12 8 4
17 13 9 5
18 14 10
19 15
20
or 4 x 3:
in:
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12
out:
1
4 2
7 5 3
10 8 6
11 9
12