I can't handle navigation from one modal window to another.
I have routing module:
{
path: 'modal1',
component: Modal1Component,
outlet: 'modal',
}, {
path: 'modal2',
component: Modal2Component,
outlet: 'modal',
}
Main component: MainComponent and in its template i have
<router-outlet name="modal"></router-outlet>
So i am clicking a button that triggers
this.router.navigate([this.router.url, { outlets: {modal: 'modal1'} }]);
And in Modal1Component that is rendered i have a button for modal2. So i want to call modal2 from modal1. How can i tell router to go to the parent route and then call:
this.router.navigate([/* what should be here? */, { outlets: {modal: 'modal2'} }]);
It looks like you're just changing the outlet in your router.navigate, but the route itself is not actually changing. And I don't think you actually require a named outlet to do what you're trying to achieve.
When you use router.navigate, you can specify if you want to navigate relatively from somewhere using the ActivatedRoute class. To do so, you have two options :
navigate relatively from you current component and indicate in the path that you want to "go up" one level. Example :
this.router.navigate(['../modal2'], { relativeTo: this.activatedRoute });
navigate directly from you parent. I would personaly use this one but both works. Example :
this.router.navigate(['modal2'], { relativeTo: this.activatedRoute.parent });
I created a mini repo with an example of what (I think) you're trying to achieve on : stackblitz.
Hope that helps
Some service can be useful in this case, like in doc:
https://angular.io/guide/component-interaction
Related
I am new at Vue.js. I am working on demo project. In my project, I have three different navbar. First one for HomePage, second one for Login/Register page and third one is for Dashboard. In frameworks like React and Vue we set one global navbar for all pages. How can I render this three navbar components conditionally ? What is the best practice for that ? I want to set vuex for solve that, is that a right approach ?
You can do it using named routes. In your component you set multiple named router views:
<router-view name="navbar"></router-view>
<router-view ></router-view>
And in routes you set which component to render and where:
const router = new VueRouter({
routes: [
{
path: '/',
components: {
default: HomeContent,
navbar: HomeNavbar,
}
},
{
path: '/dashboard',
components: {
default: DashboardContent,
navbar: DashboardNavbar,
}
}
]
})
Otherwise you can set a conditional in the component and render navbar based on route:
if ($route.path === home) {
<NavbarHome />
}
If navbars have much in common you can just use a conditional for elements that are in one but not in another.
Actually what you can do is make a navbar component and use v-if to check on which route you are currently on. You can use the $route object to verify the current URL and use computed to check if the route name or params/queries are the same as you want.
computed: {
dashboard() {
return this.$route.name === 'Dashboard'
}
}
And then in your navbar component use v-if="dashboard" to check your conditions
I'm trying to open the expanded item on some grid of components that are rendered inside the named outlet. For that purpose I've created a children to my named outlet path.
I'm using the Angular 7 and already tried some guides from other posts. Also it seems possible to make by just specify another outlet.
Routing:
{
path: 'my-path',
outlet: 'view',
component: MyComponent,
data: {
animation: 'bottom-left-scale'
},
children: [
{
path: 'project',
component: ExpandedProjectComponent
}]
}
in html:
<app-project [id]="project.id" [thumbnail]="project.thumbnail" [name]="project.name" [routerLink]="[{outlets: { view: 'my-path/project' }}]">
</app-project>
But when trying to navigate to it get the error that
ERROR Error: Uncaught (in promise): Error: Cannot match any routes. URL Segment: 'my-path'.
Using tracing shows it like this - url: "/(view:my-path/(view:my-path/project))" where project should be expanded item. How can i navigate to smth like /(view:my-path/project) or /(view:my-path)/project?
So, trying it from routerLink directive fails. But using the router.navigate works.
app.routing.ts stays the same.
ExpandedProjectComponent
openProject(id) {
this.router.navigate('project', {relativeTo: this.route});
}
In AngularJS, for routing purposes, we define states with children which makes it possible to switch between views with the result that each view is always rendered in one container:
$stateProvider.state("communication.create-message", {
url: ...,
templateUrl: ...,
menu: ...,
parent: "communication",
ncyBreadcrumb: {
label: "Create Message"
}
});
Whichever state we choose - the view is always rendered within one container that has ui-view attribute.
I'm trying to achieve the same in Angular 2 or above, but I have no idea of how to reproduce the above-stated functionality.
In app.component.ts we have router-outlet where component templates get rendered.
Say, we have many nested child routes - is it possible to render all of them within this outlet ?
What would the code in app-routing.module.ts look like in this case ?
Could anyone please give a working example of how to go about it ?
Step 1 : Import Routes from #angular/router
in app.module.ts .. import Routes. You have to write
import {Routes} from '#angular/core'
Step 2 :
Add all the routes you want to set up in an array pf type Routes like :
this is for informing angular all the routes in your app. Each route is a javascript object in this array.
const appRoutes : Routes = [
{path : 'communication-route'}
]
always you have to give path , this what you enter after your domain like "localhost :4200/communication-route".
Step 3: Add the action to route i.e what happens when this path is reached.
const appRoutes : Routes = [
{path : 'communication-route'} , component :communicationroutecomponent
]
here i have given the component name "communicationroutecomponent" , i.e this component will be loaded when the path "/communication-route" is reached
Step 4: Register your routes in your app
To do this you will have to do new import in app.module.ts
import {RouterModule} from '#angular/router'
Routermodule has special method forRoot() which registers our routes .
In our case we will have to write this piece of code in
imports :[
RouterModule.forRoot(appRoutes)
]
Our routes are now registered and angular knows our routes now.
Step 5 : Where to display the route content i.e the html content of you route page.
For this angular has directive .
We need to include where we want to load our content i.e in the html.
<a router-outlet="/communication-route"></a>
Navigating to routes :
angular gives a directive for this routerLink
so if we want to navigate to users component , you can give this in your html element:
routerLink="/communication-route"
I hope i was able to explain how this works.
Your code should be as follows
export const ComRoute: Routes = [
{
path: 'communication-route',
children: [
{ path: 'communication', component: communicationComponent },
{ path: ':child1', component: child1Component },
{ path: ':child1/field', component: child1Component}
]
}
];
First of all, states are not an official AngularJS concept. They come from ui-router, which began life as an alternate to the simplistic built in router.
Eventually, ui-router became the de facto standard for routing in AngularJS while the official ng-route module was extracted into a separate, optional library by the Angular team.
ui-router, is complex but exceptional and has earned what is in my view well deserved popularity and success. This success has led to its expansion to support additional platforms enabling the same powerful state based structure in applications written for frameworks such as React.
It is now available for Angular (formerly known as Angular 2).
You can read the documentation and see how to get started on https://ui-router.github.io/ng2
Here is a snippet from the src/app/app.states.ts module of the official example repository
export const loginState = {
parent: 'app',
name: 'login',
url: '/login',
component: LoginComponent,
resolve: [
{ token: 'returnTo', deps: [Transition], resolveFn: returnTo },
]
};
As we can see, there are compatible concepts available, including what looks like a nice evolution of the resolves API which allows function oriented injection which was generally simpler than class based injection in ui-router with AngularJS.
Note, I have not used it in an Angular project.
With Angular 2, I could make a child route render "over" its parent by defining an empty path and creating an essentially empty base component. I am trying to accomplish something similar with the new Angular router (version 4.3.1), but have hit a roadblock.
To reproduce my problem, here's a Plunker. The routes are defined as:
[{
path: '',
redirectTo: "/master",
pathMatch: "full"
}, {
path: 'master',
component: MasterComponent,
children: [{
path: 'detail/:value',
component: DetailComponent,
children: [{
path: 'subdetail',
component: SubDetailComponent
}]
}]
}]
When I navigate to a detail page, the master page is still visible because I have added a <router-outlet></router-outlet> to MasterComponent. What I need is to replace the master view with the detail. I can accomplish this by making detail/:value a sibling of master rather than a child, but this isn't logically correct in my application and breaks my breadcrumbs.
Is there any proper way to handle this kind of pattern, or will I have to pick a workaround, such as showing and hiding the intended route or manually specifying a dedicated "main" outlet for every link?
The only existing solution that comes close is to define a dummy parent component, but this only works one-level down. If my detail page has another sub-detail page that should also replace master, it gets very messy.
Is there any route-level flag I can set or design pattern to implement to elegantly accomplish this? I am an Angular 2 beginner, but I feel as though something like this should be simple.
First, there is no "new" router in 4.3.1. It's the same router from 2.x.
Second, there were a few changes I needed to make to your plunker to make it work appropriately. The key change was this in the master.component.ts:
<a [routerLink]="['/detail', 5]">
I added a slash. Without the slash it was looking for a route named master/detail/5
The route definition is now flat, so everything will appear "under" your main header.
export const routes: Routes = [
{
path: '',
redirectTo: 'master',
pathMatch: 'full'
},
{
path: 'master',
component: MasterComponent
},
{
path: 'detail/:value',
component: DetailComponent
}
];
The updated plunker is here: https://plnkr.co/edit/EHehUR6qSi248vQPDntt?p=preview
I have been playing around with Angular2 route example which has child route as default route, but the example did not navigate to that default route: https://angular.io/resources/live-examples/tutorial/ts/plnkr.html
While the tutorial of Tour of Heroes which has not child route, useAsDefault was working normally: https://angular.io/resources/live-examples/router/ts/plnkr.html
Any sollution would be appreciated. Thanks in advance
Apparently nested useAsDefaults don't work, I'm not aware of that behavior. Note too that the problem is the useAsDefault in the parent route, not in the child.
You can fix that issue though by adding a redirectTo.
#RouteConfig([
{ path : '/', redirectTo : ['CrisisCenter'] }, // Here...
{ // Crisis Center child route
path: '/crisis-center/...',
name: 'CrisisCenter',
component: CrisisCenterComponent
},
{path: '/heroes', name: 'Heroes', component: HeroListComponent},
{path: '/hero/:id', name: 'HeroDetail', component: HeroDetailComponent},
{path: '/disaster', name: 'Asteroid', redirectTo: ['./CrisisCenter', 'CrisisDetail', {id:3}]}
])
export class AppComponent { }
Note that I removed the extra useAsDefault. I'll file an issue so they can fix it in the docs.
Update 2
It isn't a mistake in the docs actually, it's a bug. I got the confirmation by #wardbell. There's already an issue filed for this bug.
So according to his comment the docs won't be updated (there's nothing to update, it's a bug!).
This issue was reported [...]. I left the doc as is, hoping that it will become correct soon.
Update
Here's the issue I filed. They'll tell us if it's a mistake in the docs or not (most likely, I'll bet on that). I'll update after they answer.