Format rest response in angular js without ng bind html - javascript

So basically the issue I am facing is that I have a database with a lot of data in it. So when i query using $http, i get a response. The response is a large amount of data and when I bind it to the model it's very difficult to read the data.
So currently I post data into the database from an android app with html tags and then use ng-bind html to render it as html. This is causing trouble analyzing the data. What can be done to avoid HTML tags and still render the data so it is readable. The attached images will further help you understand.
This is how it looks with html tags and ng bind
This is how it looks without html tags, not very pretty and readabale.
The highlighted portion is how the data arrives. I need to get rid of those tags which are messing up the database. However the entire complaint portion value is associated with one key.

I was also facing the same problem while working on my project. And the easiest solution I get is to use the markdown language.In this, you can store your data in the form of markdowns and when you retrieve them by using markdown parser you will get a better data. there are a lot of markdown parser available. I recommend using "marked.js".

Related

Using a form to save/update settings in a db and build a HTML with those settings from a template

My limited experience in web development as a self-taught led me to hit a wall while trying to figure out how to deal with this problem.
I need a form (map_settings.php) where the user should enter some inputs. Those inputs must be saved in a database table (MAPS) and then used to create the final HTML file (e.g. map1.html) for that specific user/inputs.
I know how to deal with using forms and saving submitted data to a database.
What is completely obscure to me is how can I use those inputs to automatically generate the final HTML.
My idea is to have a template HTML (template.html) and each time a user saves new settings via the form, I copy the template and replace some variables inside it with the actual data the user has input in the form.
If this might matter, the variables I need to replace in the template are also JavaScript variables within a <script> tag.
Can anybody help me suggesting one viable way to do this? I am mostly using JavaScript and PHP, without frameworks. I've also red about JavaScript templating engines, but I sincerely did not get if those are useful to me in my case.
Anyway, here is an illustration of what I would need to do, to hopefully clarify better my point.
Creating a static HTML file per user is not the way to go. Instead just have a PHP script like mapdisplay.php or similar.
Make the script so that if you type mapdisplay.php?map=1 in the browser then it will read the map ID, get the relevant settings from the database for the map in question and then generate some HTML to display them - of course you can have most of the HTML ready made like a template, and just use PHP to fill in the details from the database. This idea of getting data on the fly when requested, and plugging it into some HTML is how most web applications work.
If you create a static HTML for each user it quickly becomes unmanageable with a large number of users, plus it's hard to introduce changes or improvements to the template because instead of just updating one script file, you have to back and re-do every existing page. There are other disadvantages to your approach too, but I won't continue here - you get the idea I hope.
If I were you I'll make that in this way:
Don't use template.html
Don't get data from database to new file, but from form
Make database test before make file
To make template use
$template_text = "text...text...html...text...".$php_varible."text...text...html...text";
For other things about php see w3schools

Passing large data batches to Pug file from Node/Express

Note that this has been edited since the initial posting
I am building a Data Dashboard using NodeJs, Express, and Pug and have a question regarding the passing of data from NodeJs/Express to the Pug file.
I know that you can pass variables directly to the Pug file through express's local variables as seen below:
res.render('index', {title: 'This is the Title'});
My question is regarding the most efficient way of creating HTML using this data.
There are 3 main methods I am considering using and would like a more experienced insight into which may be the most suitable.
Dynamically generate elements in Javascript
The first option is to emit the data using Socket and then to create the HTML elements in Javascript using the data and appending them to the body.
My main worry with this option is that it may not be as efficient building large amounts of HTML in Javascript after the page has been rendered.
Create HTML Elements in Pug and supply data through Javascript
The second option I am considering is to create the elements with-in the Pug file (Only passing the number of elements) and then to supply the data through the Javascript after the page has rendered.
Create HTML elements completely in Pug
My final option is to pass all the data (Roughly 3 tables, around 5-10 rows with 5 columns of data) to the Pug file and to create the elements with the data inside the Template file.
I apologies if this question makes no sense, I'm relatively new to Pug, Express and Node but am finding myself improving every day. Any insights or tips/techniques would be extremely appreciated.
If theres any other information that may help, please do ask.
Thanks for reading!

Is it good to return html code to jquery?

I'm working on a project where it has a number of pages. Each page displays 10 rows where the layout that is using for each page is different. Until now I had the html code of each row in a javascript code and based on the page's url I was using the appropriate html code (if statement). The if statement is inside into a loop which is looping based on the number of rows. The results of the rows are coming from an ajax method. Now I want somehow to separate it so it can be more easily for me to maintain it, basically to remove the html code from the javascript and keep each row's html code into a different file.
Note: the Ajax is in a given time, is sending automatically requests to the php file for any new rows.
One solution which I came out is that I can use the php to create a variable with the html code .
Second solution is to create an array of each record with the html code and then pass it to jquery to print it.
Both solutions I don't know if are good solutions and can help me to maintain the project in the future.
You might consider a template library such as handlebars to help with templating. Frameworks such as AngularJS and Ember also excel at solving these kinds of problems.
Your Web Services API should be returning JSON though, not HTML fragments. Let the client build the DOM, and let the server focus on data.
You should return structured data (see JSON for example) to your AJAX request. This way, you can support multiple interfaces (e.g., a website, an application): each interface will get only the data, and will handle the rendering as it needs.
In your example, you ask for data via an AJAX request, your server responds with a JSON-structured response. JQuery reads it and converts it to javascript array thanks to jQuery.getJSON. With your array, you loop through each element and insert html elements into the webpage.
You have two options:
If your HTML templates is not changing frequently, the best way is to define html templates in your HTML structure using some java script template library (eg. Handlebars) and fill it with data from your AJAX (JSON) requests.
If your HTML templates change frequently or depends on some conditions (data) in row, you should create PHP partial views which generate proper html structure already filled with data.
For many rows it is better idea to create whole table server side to reduce requests.

angularJS & web2py: calling python from ng/javascript/html

I'm using AngularJS (mainly the client side) and web2py (mainly the server side)together in an app.
I have an issue now.
At a point of the program, I use AngularJS to get some data from the client and these data are store in an AngularJS variable. I planed to use $http.post to submit these data to database directly, but it didn't work due to cross-orign problem.
Right now I'm trying to pass these data(they are in JSON format) back to web2py and let web2py insert these data to database.(similar to submitting a SQLFORM).
Is there anyway I could pass these data as an argument to an web2py function and invoke that function within javascript code?
Possible approach in my mind:
1) Since I could write python in html using {{}}, and I could write html in javascript, could I write python code within javascript using something like: document.write({{python code}}) ?
I tried this but whatever html I write it goes to a brand new html page. I also tried document.getElementById('testDiv').write("<p></p>"); But it doesn't work.
2)use ajax, I'm not familiar with ajax, any example will be really appreciated!
Any thoughts?
Thank you all!
ok so you got me lost for a second there, lets see if i got it right
1- angular as your frontend
2- python as your backend
3- you are rendering an html document in python and delivering it to the browser
4- since python template language uses {{}} as delimiter am assuming you changed the angulars delimiters too
either using ajax or reload you'll need to provide a python post handler script. that takes your data and makes the DB update. if this is going to be a pattern and you are going to be making AJAX CRUD operations, you should use angular resources ngResource if not a simple
$http.post(url,data).success(function(response){})
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/service/$http#post
where url would be your form submission handler url.
if you where to use a form you'll need to set the target to an iframe hidden in your page and the response should a script tag that gets the scope pertinent to your controller and let him know the result of the operation. this is an old approach, but handy when it comes to send information to sites that don't allow CORS which by the way might be the solution to your problem, when storing data directly to your db, you might just need to enable CORS headers in your storage engine API and that should allow you to submit information even when coming from a different domain
After hours of struggles and countless google, here's my workaround solution:
Main problem: the data are stored in AngularJS but AngulatJS could not submit data to database through API due to cross-orign issue. But Web2py could submit data to database using sqlform.
My approach:
1.)When the user click the submit button, invoke 'ng-click="submitBtn()"'.
submitBtn() is a function of the ng-controller, which has access to the data.
2.)In submitBtn(), the function first write data into web2py's sqlform through
document.getElementById('inputId').value=$scope.data;
then the function click the sqlform submit button through
document.getElementById('submitBtn').click();
It took me a lot time to figure out those element ids of fields in web2py's auto-generated sqlform. The way to find them is using developers' inspect element tool in a browser and see the source code directly.
Hope this will help someone will face the same issue!

Generating HTML in JavaScript vs loading HTML file

Currently I am creating a website which is completely JS driven. I don't use any HTML pages at all (except index page). Every query returns JSON and then I generate HTML inside JavaScript and insert into the DOM. Are there any disadvantages of doing this instead of creating HTML file with layout structure, then loading this file into the DOM and changing elements with new data from JSON?
EDIT:
All of my pages are loaded with AJAX calls. But I have a structure like this:
<nav></nav>
<div id="content"></div>
<footer></footer>
Basically, I never change nav or footer elements, they are only loaded once, when loading index.html file. Then on every page click I send an AJAX call to the server, it returns data in JSON and I generate HTML code with jQuery and insert like this $('#content').html(content);
Creating separate HTML files, and then for example using $('#someID').html(newContent) to change every element with JSON data, will use even more code and I will need 1 more request to server to load this file, so I thought I could just generate it in browser.
EDIT2:
SEO is not very important, because my website requires logging in so I will create all meta tags in index.html file.
In general, it's a nice way of doing things. I assume that you're updating the page with AJAX each time (although you didn't say that).
There are some things to look out for. If you always have the same URL, then your users can't come back to the same page. And they can't send links to their friends. To deal with this, you can use history.pushState() to update the URL without reloading the page.
Also, if you're sending more than one request per page and you don't have an HTML structure waiting for them, you may get them back in a different order each time. It's not a problem, just something to be aware of.
Returning HTML from the AJAX is a bad idea. It means that when you want to change the layout of the page, you need to edit all of your files. If you're returning JSON, it's much easier to make changes in one place.
One thing that definitly matters :
How long will it take you to develop a new system that will send data as JSON + code the JS required to inject it as HTML into the page ?
How long will it take to just return HTML ? And how long if you can re-use some of your already existing server-side code ?
and check how much is the server side interrection of your pages...
also some advantages of creating pure HTML :
1) It's simple markup, and often just as compact or actually more compact than JSON.
2) It's less error prone cause all you're getting is markup, and no code.
3) It will be faster to program in most cases cause you won't have to write code separately for the client end.
4) The HTML is the content, the JavaScript is the behavior. You're mixing both for absolutely no compelling reason.
in javascript or nay other scripting language .. if you encountered a problem in between the rest of the code will not work
and also it is easier to debug in pure html pages
my opinion ... use scriptiong code wherever necessary .. rest of the code you can do in html ...
it will save the triptime of going to server then fetch the data and then displaying it again.
Keep point No. 4 in your mind while coding.
I think that you can consider 3 methods:
Sending only JSON to the client and rendering according to a template (i.e.
handlerbar.js)
Creating the pages from the server-side, usually faster rendering also you can cache the page.
Or a mixture of this would be to generate partial views from the server and sending them to the client, for example it's like having a handlebar template on the client and applying the data from the JSON, but only having the same template on the server-side and rendering it on the server and sending it to the client in the final format, on the client you can just replace the partial views.
Also some things to think about determined by the use case of the applicaton, is that if you are targeting SEO you should consider ColBeseder advice, of if you are targeting mobile users, probably you would better go with the JSON only response, as this is a more lightweight response.
EDIT:
According to what you said you are creating a single page application, if this is correct, then probably you can go with either the JSON or a partial views like AngularJS has. But if your server-side logic is written to handle only JSON response, then probably you could better use a template engine on the client like handlerbar.js, underscore, or jquery templates, and you can define reusable portions of your HTML and apply to it the data from the JSON.
If you cared about SEO you'd want the HTML there at page load, which is closer to your second strategy than your first.
Update May 2014: Google claims to be getting better at executing Javascript: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2014/05/understanding-web-pages-better.html Still unclear what works and what does not.
Further updates probably belong here: Do Google or other search engines execute JavaScript?

Categories