In my project I need to save the data to .txt or .xml or .json file. I could not find any answer from vis.js website/issues blog. It might be simple, do not know. Really helpful if anyone help me out with example code. Thank you so much in advance.
function saveData(data,callback) {
data.id = document.getElementById('node-id').value;
data.label = document.getElementById('node-label').value;
clearPopUp();
callback(data);
}
If I understand you correctly, you are looking for a way to save data and options of a graph. In my graph editor adaptation for TiddlyWiki Classic I use the following method to extract data (the full implementation can be found in the repo, see config.macros.graph.saveDataAndOptions, here's a simplified one):
config.macros.graph.saveDataAndOptions = function(network,newOptions) {
newOptions = newOptions || {};
// get nodes and edges
var nodes = network.body.data.nodes._data; // contains id, label, x,y, custom per-node options and doesn't contain options from options.nodes; presumably contains option values set when network was created, not current ones (it is so for x,y)
// no suitable getter unfortunately
var edges = network.body.data.edges._data; // map; for edges to/from? certain node use network.getConnectedNodes(id)
// network.body.data.edges._data is a hash of { id: , from: , to: }
// get node positions, options
var positions = network.getPositions(), // map
options = // get options stored previously
// merge newOptions into options
for(var nodeId in nodes) {
// nodes[nodeId].x is the initial value, positions[nodeId].x is the current one
if(positions[nodeId]) { // undefined for hidden
nodes[nodeId].x = positions[nodeId].x;
nodes[nodeId].y = positions[nodeId].y;
}
storedNode = copyObjectProperties(nodes[nodeId]);
storedNodes.push(storedNode);
}
//# do whatever you need with storedNodes, edges and options
// (pack them with JSON.stringify, store to a file etc)
};
However, while this works ok for storing data, this only helps to save options passed for storing explicitly which can be not very nice for some cases. I use this method in manipulation helpers and on dragEnd (network.on("dragEnd",this.saveToTiddlerAfterDragging), config.macros.graph.saveToTiddlerAfterDragging = function(stuff) { config.macros.graph.saveDataAndOptions(this,{ physics: false }); };). I haven't recieved any better suggestions, though.
If you need to get data and options reactively and setting such helper to handle certain edit events can't solve your problem, then I suggest wrapping nodes, edges and options as vis.DataSet and save those when needed. This is related too.
To answer the question about events/other ways to use such methods. Here's how I use them:
I save data after drag&drop moving of nodes, this is done using an event handler. Namely, I introduced
config.macros.graph.saveToTiddlerAfterDragging = function(stuff) {
config.macros.graph.saveDataAndOptions(this,{ physics: false });
};
(when drag&drop is used, physics should be switched off, otherwise coordinates won't be preserved anyway) and then I use
network.on("dragEnd",this.saveToTiddlerAfterDragging);
so that changes are saved.
As for saving after adding/editing a node/edge, I apply saving not by an event (although it's nice thinking, and you should try events of DataSet, since there's no special graph events for that). What I do is I add an elaborated hijack to the manipulation methods. Take a look at the source I've linked after the
var mSettings = options.manipulation;
line: for each manipulation method, like options.manipulation.addNode I hijack it so that its callback is hijacked to call config.macros.graph.saveDataAndOptions in the end. Here's a simplified version of what I'm doing:
var nonSaving_addNode = options.manipulation.addNode;
options.manipulation.addNode = function(data,callback) {
// hijack callback to add saving
arguments[1] = function() {
callback.apply(this,arguments); // preserve initial action
config.macros.graph.saveDataAndOptions(network); // add saving
};
nonSaving_addNode.apply(this,arguments);
}
The thing is, addNode is actually called when the add node button is clicked; though, I'm using a customized one to create a popup and apply changes once user is happy with the label they chose.
Related
I need to add an overlay to an existing OpenSeadragon viewer object which isn't created by my code, but elsewhere in the application.
I have got to a point where I know that the viewer has been created as I can access the various html elements that are created via jQuery. However I can't work out if there's any way to create a viewer from an existing reference.
I've tried using the id of the viewer div in:
var viewer = OpenSeadragon(id: "open-seadragon-viewer-id");
but this doesn't seem to work.
Is there any way to do this or can you only get the viewer within the code that initialised it?
Here's one crazy thought... you could monkey-patch some portion of OSD in order to grab the viewer...
var viewer;
var originalIsOpen = OpenSeadragon.Viewer.prototype.isOpen;
OpenSeadragon.Viewer.prototype.isOpen = function() {
// Now we know the viewer!
viewer = this;
// Reinstate the original, since we only need to run our version once
OpenSeadragon.Viewer.prototype.isOpen = originalIsOpen;
// Call the original
return originalIsOpen.call(this);
}
It's kind of tacky, but should work. Note this assumes there is only one viewer on the page... if there are more than one, the same principle could work but you would need to keep track of an array of viewers.
BTW, I'm using isOpen, because it's simple and it gets called every frame. Other functions could work as well.
EDIT: fixed code so we are using the prototype. I still haven't actually tested this code so there may still be bugs!
This solution does not directly answer the question, as it relies on your own code creating the OpenSeaDragon object. It is an implementation of #iangilman's mention of storing the viewer in a global variable. However others may find it useful. (Note that passing a global variable to a function requires a workaround - see Passing a global variable to a function)
The code demonstrates how to use the same OpenSeaDragon object to display different pictures.
var viewer3=null; //global variable
var newURL1='image/imageToDisplay1.png';
var newURL2='image/imageToDisplay2.png';
var elementID='myID';
//the loadScan function will display the picture using openSeaDragon and can be called as many times as you want.
loadScan("viewer3",newURL1,elementID);
loadScan("viewer3",newURL2,elementID);
//the actual function
function loadScan(theViewer,newURL,theID) {
//if object has already been created, then just change the image
if (window[theViewer]!=null) {
window[theViewer].open({
type: 'image',
url: newURL
});
} else {
//create a new OpenSeadragon object
window[theViewer] = OpenSeadragon({
prefixUrl: "/myapp/vendor/openseadragon/images/",
id: theID,
defaultZoomLevel: 1,
tileSources: {
url: newURL,
type: 'image'
}
});
}
}
Manipulation methods of vis.js only include addNodeMode(), but not something like addNode(). I wonder if there's some nice way to create a node on click. May be by manipulating the data instead of network itself?
Of'course, one may go
network.on('click',function(params){
if((params.nodes.length == 0) && (params.edges.length == 0)) {
network.addNodeMode(); // doesn't add, one more click needed
//# generate click in the same place. Use params.pointer.canvas
// or params.pointer.DOM to set appropriate coordinates
}
})
but then we have also to prevent infinit loops since we generate a click event in a click handler..
Ok, here's my current implementation:
...
data = ...
nodes = new vis.DataSet(data.nodes); // make nodes manipulatable
data = { nodes:nodes, edges:edges };
...
var network = new vis.Network(container, data, options);
network.on('click',function(params){
if((params.nodes.length == 0) && (params.edges.length == 0)) {
var updatedIds = nodes.add([{
label:'new',
x:params.pointer.canvas.x,
y:params.pointer.canvas.y
}]);
network.selectNodes([updatedIds[0]]);
network.editNode();
}
})
It's not perfect since it actually creates a node and starts editing it, so if we cancel editing, the node stays. It also creates unwanted shadows of nodes. But it's already a working prototype which is enough to start with.
You can add nodes dynamically by using the update method of the vis.DataSet class. See this documentation page for details: https://visjs.github.io/vis-data/data/dataset.html
I am using jQuery and jQuery UI, and I am almost new to JavaScript. I would like to set a global variable in the window object so to keep custom data related to multiple jQuery objects. That is, at this time I am using the following (poor) code:
// Given
window.myDataObject = {};
// Then, in the same file, I run multiple times (one time for each 'tag_id_1',
// 'tag_id_2', ..., 'tag_id_N') the following code
var tag = $('#tag_id_N')
myDataObject = { pagination: { page : 1, per_page: 10 } } // This aims to keep pagination data for tags.
Since I am trying to keep data for multiple tags, running the above code multiple times makes the window.myDataObject to be continuously "re-initialized" (making the keeping process inefficient). Because that, I thought to add "namespaced" properties (maybe, namespaced with "something" related to each tag object) to window.myDataObject so that each tag has its own pagination data.
How can I make that? Is that approach a "good" / "proper" way to proceed?
I think you're just looking for the .data() method:
The .data() method allows us to attach data of any type to DOM
elements in a way that is safe from circular references and therefore
from memory leaks.
We can set several distinct values for a single element and retrieve
them later:
First of all you should be using the window object not windows.
Secondly if you want to use multiple tags you could try to do the following:
// Given
windows.taggedObjects = {};
// Then, in the same file, I run multiple times (one time for each 'tag_id_1',
// 'tag_id_2', ..., 'tag_id_N') the following code
var tagId = 'tag_id_N';
// This aims to keep pagination data for tags.
window.taggedObjects[tagId] = { tag: $('#' + tagId), pagination: { page : 1, per_page: 10 } };
To retrieve your data just use the tag id again like so:
alert(window.taggedObjects[tagId]);
Is it possible to instantiate an element on Mootools based on the automatic UID that mootools create?
EDIT: To give more info on what is going. I'm using https://github.com/browserstate/history.js to make a history within an ajax page. When I add a DOM element to it (which does not have an id), at some point it passes through a JSON.toString methods and what I have of the element now is just the uid.
I need to recreate the element based on this UID, how could I go about doing that? Do I need to first add it to the global storage to retrieve later? If so, how?
in view of edited question:
sorry, I fail to understand what you are doing.
you have an element. at some point the element is turned into an object that gets serialised (all of it? prototypes etc?). you then take that data and convert to an object again but want to preserve the uid? why?
I don't understand how the uid matters much here...
Using global browser storage also serialises to string so that won't help much. Are we talking survival of page loads here or just attach/detach/overwrite elements? If the latter, this can work with some tweaking.
(function() {
var Storage = {};
Element.implement({
saveElement: function() {
var uid = document.id(this).uid;
Storage[uid] = this;
return this;
}
});
this.restoreElement = function(uid) {
return Storage[uid] || null;
}
})();
var foo = document.id("foo"), uid = foo.uid;
console.log(uid);
foo.saveElement().addEvent("mouseenter", function() { alert("hi"); } );
document.id("container").set("html", "");
setTimeout(function() {
var newElement = restoreElement(uid);
if (newElement)
newElement.inject(document.body);
console.log(newElement.uid);
}, 2000);
http://jsfiddle.net/dimitar/7mwmu/1/
this will allow you to remove an element and restore it later.
keep in mind that i do container.set("html", ""); which is not a great practice.
if you do .empty(), it will GC the foo and it will wipe it's storage so the event won't survive. same for foo.destroy() - you can 'visually' restore the element but nothing linked to it will work (events or fx).
you can get around that by using event delegation, however.
also, you may want to store parent node etc so you can put it back to its previous place.
NOTICE: THIS IS SOLVED, I WILL PUBLISH THE SOLUTION HERE ASAP.
Hey all,
Ok... I have a simple dojo page with the bare essentials. Three UL's with some LI's in them. The idea si to allow drag-n-drop among them but if any UL goes empty due to the last item being dragged out, I will put up a message to the user to gie them some instructions.
In order to do that, I wanted to extend the dojo.dnd.Source dijit and add some intelligence. It seemed easy enough. To keep things simple (I am loading Dojo from a CDN) I am simply declating my extension as opposed to doing full on module load. The declaration function is here...
function declare_mockupSmartDndUl(){
dojo.require("dojo.dnd.Source");
dojo.provide("mockup.SmartDndUl");
dojo.declare("mockup.SmartDndUl", dojo.dnd.Source, {
markupFactory: function(params, node){
//params._skipStartup = true;
return new mockup.SmartDndUl(node, params);
},
onDndDrop: function(source, nodes, copy){
console.debug('onDndDrop!');
if(this == source){
// reordering items
console.debug('moving items from us');
// DO SOMETHING HERE
}else{
// moving items to us
console.debug('moving items to us');
// DO SOMETHING HERE
}
console.debug('this = ' + this );
console.debug('source = ' + source );
console.debug('nodes = ' + nodes);
console.debug('copy = ' + copy);
return dojo.dnd.Source.prototype.onDndDrop.call(this, source, nodes, copy);
}
});
}
I have a init function to use this to decorate the lists...
dojo.addOnLoad(function(){
declare_mockupSmartDndUl();
if(dojo.byId('list1')){
//new mockup.SmartDndUl(dojo.byId('list1'));
new dojo.dnd.Source(dojo.byId('list1'));
}
if(dojo.byId('list2')){
new mockup.SmartDndUl(dojo.byId('list2'));
//new dojo.dnd.Source(dojo.byId('list2'));
}
if(dojo.byId('list3')){
new mockup.SmartDndUl(dojo.byId('list3'));
//new dojo.dnd.Source(dojo.byId('list3'));
}
});
It is fine as far as it goes, you will notice I left "list1" as a standard dojo dnd source for testing.
The problem is this - list1 will happily accept items from lists 2 & 3 who will move or copy as apprriate. However lists 2 & 3 refuce to accept items from list1. It is as if the DND operation is being cancelled, but the debugger does show the dojo.dnd.Source.prototype.onDndDrop.call happening, and the paramaters do look ok to me.
Now, the documentation here is really weak, so the example I took some of this from may be way out of date (I am using 1.4).
Can anyone fill me in on what might be the issue with my extension dijit?
Thanks!
If you use Dojo XD loader (used with CDNs), all dojo.require() are asynchronous. Yet declare_mockupSmartDndUl() assumes that as soon as it requires dojo.dnd.Source it is available. Generally it is not guaranteed.
Another nitpicking: dojo.dnd.Source is not a widget/dijit, while it is scriptable and can be used with the Dojo Markup, it doesn't implement any Dijit's interfaces.
Now the problem — the method you are overriding has following definition in 1.4:
onDndDrop: function(source, nodes, copy, target){
// summary:
// topic event processor for /dnd/drop, called to finish the DnD operation
// source: Object
// the source which provides items
// nodes: Array
// the list of transferred items
// copy: Boolean
// copy items, if true, move items otherwise
// target: Object
// the target which accepts items
if(this == target){
// this one is for us => move nodes!
this.onDrop(source, nodes, copy);
}
this.onDndCancel();
},
Notice that it has 4 arguments, not 3. As you can see if you do not pass the 4th argument, onDrop is never going to be called by the parent method.
Fix these two problems and most probably you'll get what you want.
In the end, I hit the Dojo IRC (great folks!) and we ended up (so far) with this...
function declare_mockupSmartDndUl(){
dojo.require("dojo.dnd.Source");
dojo.provide("mockup.SmartDndUl");
dojo.declare("mockup.SmartDndUl", dojo.dnd.Source, {
markupFactory: function(params, node){
//params._skipStartup = true;
return new mockup.SmartDndUl(node, params);
},
onDropExternal: function(source, nodes, copy){
console.debug('onDropExternal called...');
// dojo.destroy(this.getAllNodes().query(".dndInstructions"));
this.inherited(arguments);
var x = source.getAllNodes().length;
if( x == 0 ){
newnode = document.createElement('li');
newnode.innerHTML = "You can drag stuff here!";
dojo.addClass(newnode,"dndInstructions");
source.node.appendChild(newnode);
}
return true;
// return dojo.dnd.Source.prototype.onDropExternal.call(this, source, nodes, copy);
}
});
}
And you can see where I am heading, I put in a message when the source is empty (client specs, ug!) and I need to find a way to kill it when something gets dragged in (since it is not, by definition, empty any more ona incomming drag!). That part isnt workign so well.
Anyway, the magic was not to use the onDnd_____ functions, but the higher level one and then call this.inherited(arguments) to fire off the built in functionality.
Thanks!
dojo.require("dojo.dnd.Source");
dojo.provide("mockup.SmartDndUl");
dojo.declare("mockup.SmartDndUl", dojo.dnd.Source, {
Dojo require statement and declare statement are next to next. I think that will cause dependencies problem.
the dojo require statement should go outside onload block and the declare statement should be in onload block.