We Keep Coding

Remove a user id from array of ids [duplicate]

I want to remove an element in an array with multiple occurrences with a function.
var array=["hello","hello","world",1,"world"];
function removeItem(item){
for(i in array){
if(array[i]==item) array.splice(i,1);
}
}
removeItem("world");
//Return hello,hello,1
removeItem("hello");
//Return hello,world,1,world
This loop doesn't remove the element when it repeats twice in sequence, only removes one of them.
Why?

You have a built in function called filter that filters an array based on a predicate (a condition).
It doesn't alter the original array but returns a new filtered one.
var array=["hello","hello","world",1,"world"];
var filtered = array.filter(function(element) {
return element !== "hello";
}); // filtered contains no occurrences of hello
You can extract it to a function:
function without(array, what){
return array.filter(function(element){
return element !== what;
});
}
However, the original filter seems expressive enough.
Here is a link to its documentation
Your original function has a few issues:
It iterates the array using a for... in loop which has no guarantee on the iteration order. Also, don't use it to iterate through arrays - prefer a normal for... loop or a .forEach
You're iterating an array with an off-by-one error so you're skipping on the next item since you're both removing the element and progressing the array.

That is because the for-loop goes to the next item after the occurrence is deleted, thereby skipping the item directly after that one.
For example, lets assume item1 needs to be deleted in this array (note that <- is the index of the loop):
item1 (<-), item2, item3
after deleting:
item2 (<-), item3
and after index is updated (as the loop was finished)
item2, item3 (<-)
So you can see item2 is skipped and thus not checked!
Therefore you'd need to compensate for this by manually reducing the index by 1, as shown here:
function removeItem(item){
for(var i = 0; i < array.length; i++){
if(array[i]==item) {
array.splice(i,1);
i--; // Prevent skipping an item
}
}
}
Instead of using this for-loop, you can use more 'modern' methods to filter out unwanted items as shown in the other answer by Benjamin.

None of these answers are very optimal. The accepted answer with the filter will result in a new instance of an array. The answer with the second most votes, the for loop that takes a step back on every splice, is unnecessarily complex.
If you want to do the for loop loop approach, just count backward down to 0.
for (var i = array.length - 0; i >= 0; i--) {
if (array[i] === item) {
array.splice(i, 1);
}
}
However, I've used a surprisingly fast method with a while loop and indexOf:
var itemIndex = 0;
while ((itemIndex = valuesArray.indexOf(findItem, itemIndex)) > -1) {
valuesArray.splice(itemIndex, 1);
}
What makes this method not repetitive is that after the any removal, the next search will start at the index of the next element after the removed item. That's because you can pass a starting index into indexOf as the second parameter.
In a jsPerf test case comparing the two above methods and the accepted filter method, the indexOf routinely finished first on Firefox and Chrome, and was second on IE. The filter method was always slower by a wide margin.
Conclusion: Either reverse for loop are a while with indexOf are currently the best methods I can find to remove multiple instances of the same element from an array. Using filter creates a new array and is slower so I would avoid that.

You can use loadash or underscore js in this case
if arr is an array you can remove duplicates by:
var arr = [2,3,4,4,5,5];
arr = _.uniq(arr);

Try to run your code "manually" -
The "hello" are following each other. you remove the first, your array shrinks in one item, and now the index you have follow the next item.
removing "hello""
Start Loop. i=0, array=["hello","hello","world",1,"world"] i is pointing to "hello"
remove first item, i=0 array=["hello","world",1,"world"]
next loop, i=1, array=["hello","world",1,"world"]. second "hello" will not be removed.
Lets look at "world" =
i=2, is pointing to "world" (remove). on next loop the array is:
["hello","hello",1,"world"] and i=3. here went the second "world".
what do you wish to happen? do you want to remove all instances of the item? or only the first one? for first case, the remove should be in
while (array[i] == item) array.splice(i,1);
for second case - return as soon as you had removed item.

Create a set given an array, the original array is unmodified
Demo on Fiddle
var array=["hello","hello","world",1,"world"];
function removeDups(items) {
var i,
setObj = {},
setArray = [];
for (i = 0; i < items.length; i += 1) {
if (!setObj.hasOwnProperty(items[i])) {
setArray.push(items[i]);
setObj[items[i]] = true;
}
}
return setArray;
}
console.log(removeDups(array)); // ["hello", "world", 1]

I must say that my approach does not make use of splice feature and you need another array for this solution as well.
First of all, I guess your way of looping an array is not the right. You are using for in loops which are for objects, not arrays. You'd better use $.each in case you are using jQuery or Array.prototype.forEach if you are using vanila Javascript.
Second, why not creating a new empty array, looping through it and adding only the unique elements to the new array, like this:
FIRST APPROACH (jQuery):
var newArray = [];
$.each(array, function(i, element) {
if ($.inArray(element, newArray) === -1) {
newArray.push(region);
}
});
SECOND APPROACH (Vanila Javascript):
var newArray = [];
array.forEach(function(i, element) {
if (newArray.indexOf(element) === -1) {
newArray.push(region);
}
});

I needed a slight variation of this, the ability to remove 'n' occurrences of an item from an array, so I modified #Veger's answer as:
function removeArrayItemNTimes(arr,toRemove,times){
times = times || 10;
for(var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++){
if(arr[i]==toRemove) {
arr.splice(i,1);
i--; // Prevent skipping an item
times--;
if (times<=0) break;
}
}
return arr;
}

An alternate approach would be to sort the array and then playing around with the indexes of the values.
function(arr) {
var sortedArray = arr.sort();
//In case of numbers, you can use arr.sort(function(a,b) {return a - b;})
for (var i = 0; sortedArray.length; i++) {
if (sortedArray.indexOf(sortedArray[i]) === sortedArray.lastIndexOf(sortedArray[i]))
continue;
else
sortedArray.splice(sortedArray.indexOf(sortedArray[i]), (sortedArray.lastIndexOf(sortedArray[i]) - sortedArray.indexOf(sortedArray[i])));
}
}

You can use the following piece of code to remove multiple occurrences of value val in array arr.
while(arr.indexOf(val)!=-1){
arr.splice(arr.indexOf(val), 1);
}

I thinks this code much simpler to understand and no need to pass manually each element that what we want to remove
ES6 syntax makes our life so simpler, try it out
const removeOccurences = (array)=>{
const newArray= array.filter((e, i ,ar) => !(array.filter((e, i ,ar)=> i !== ar.indexOf(e)).includes(e)))
console.log(newArray) // output [1]
}
removeOccurences(["hello","hello","world",1,"world"])

Backwards loop only printing undefined

I am attempting to create a function that can take in an array and display its contents backwards. I am having trouble with understanding why my function call is showing undefined when I enter an array in its parameter.
var arrayOne = []
function printReverse(arrayOne) {
for(var i = arrayOne.length-1; i < 0; i--) {
console.log(arrayOne[i])
}
}

There is a misunderstading with your question:
What you want to achieve is console.log elements on screen, not return anything.
Your code
var arrayOne = []
function printReverse(arrayOne) {
for(var i = arrayOne.length-1; i < 0; i--) {
console.log(arrayOne[i])
}
}
Does not work because you have a wrong operator in your code at i < 0. This will return false at first iteration, because i will be arrayOne.length, which would be > 0 if there is any element on it.
Change this part to i >= 0 and your code will work and actually print the values on console.
However, if you really want to have a reverted array, then you should simply use Array reverse() instead of writing a function to return it.

so there are some fundamentals that are off there. as stated in another answer i will never be less than 0 because you are defining it as a value greater than 0 in your for loop. Give something like this a try
EDIT: the comments are correct in the sense that the array will be mutated so make a copy of the array first which I've added using the spread operator
Also as far as this returning undefined -- it should return undefined unless you comment out the return statement
const arrayOne = [];
function printReverse(array) {
if (!Array.isArray(array) && array.length === 0 ) {
return 'The array is empty';
}
const arrCopy = [...array];
// technically you could just reverse it
// if you return it you have to assign it to someone on the function call
// return arrCopy.reverse();
// if you want to log the reversed array you could also
// console.log(arrCopy.reverse());
// if you want to reverse it then log each single index
// arrCopy.reverse().forEach(function(item) {
// console.log(item);
// })
}
// if you were to just return the reversed array you would have to assign it to a variable
// this is just an example and wouldnt technically work because arrayOne is empty
// also if you use this YOU HAVE TO RETURN THE ARRAY COPY
// const reversedArray = printReverse(arrayOne);

If you want it to return something, you have to add a return within the function, such that
function printReverse(arrayOne) {
for(var i = arrayOne.length-1; i < 0; i--) {
console.log(arrayOne[i]);
}
return "";
}
However, in your case, this doesn't make a lot of sense. You can only return one thing, be it a String, int, array, object, whatever. But once your program hits one return statement, it will quit the function after returning the value.

How do I remove all the elements of an array using splice [duplicate]

This question's answers are a community effort. Edit existing answers to improve this post. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions.
Is there a way to empty an array and if so possibly with .remove()?
For instance,
A = [1,2,3,4];
How can I empty that?

Ways to clear an existing array A:
Method 1
(this was my original answer to the question)
A = [];
This code will set the variable A to a new empty array. This is perfect if you don't have references to the original array A anywhere else because this actually creates a brand new (empty) array. You should be careful with this method because if you have referenced this array from another variable or property, the original array will remain unchanged. Only use this if you only reference the array by its original variable A.
This is also the fastest solution.
This code sample shows the issue you can encounter when using this method:
var arr1 = ['a','b','c','d','e','f'];
var arr2 = arr1; // Reference arr1 by another variable
arr1 = [];
console.log(arr2); // Output ['a','b','c','d','e','f']
Method 2 (as suggested by Matthew Crumley)
A.length = 0
This will clear the existing array by setting its length to 0. It also works when using "strict mode" in ECMAScript 5 because the length property of an array is a read/write property.
Method 3 (as suggested by Anthony)
A.splice(0,A.length)
Using .splice() will work perfectly, but since the .splice() function will return an array with all the removed items, it will actually return a copy of the original array. Benchmarks suggest that this has no effect on performance whatsoever.
Method 4 (as suggested by tanguy_k)
while(A.length > 0) {
A.pop();
}
This solution is not very succinct, and it is also the slowest solution, contrary to earlier benchmarks referenced in the original answer.
Performance
Of all the methods of clearing an existing array, methods 2 and 3 are very similar in performance and are a lot faster than method 4. See this benchmark.
As pointed out by Diadistis in their answer below, the original benchmarks that were used to determine the performance of the four methods described above were flawed. The original benchmark reused the cleared array so the second iteration was clearing an array that was already empty.
The following benchmark fixes this flaw: http://jsben.ch/#/hyj65. It clearly shows that methods #2 (length property) and #3 (splice) are the fastest (not counting method #1 which doesn't change the original array).
This has been a hot topic and the cause of a lot of controversy. There are actually many correct answers and because this answer has been marked as the accepted answer for a very long time, I will include all of the methods here.

If you need to keep the original array because you have other references to it that should be updated too, you can clear it without creating a new array by setting its length to zero:
A.length = 0;

Here the fastest working implementation while keeping the same array ("mutable"):
function clearArray(array) {
while (array.length > 0) {
array.pop();
}
}
FYI it cannot be simplified to while (array.pop()): the tests will fail.
FYI Map and Set define clear(), it would have seem logical to have clear() for Array too.
TypeScript version:
function clearArray<T>(array: T[]) {
while (array.length > 0) {
array.pop();
}
}
The corresponding tests:
describe('clearArray()', () => {
test('clear regular array', () => {
const array = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
clearArray(array);
expect(array.length).toEqual(0);
expect(array[0]).toEqual(undefined);
expect(array[4]).toEqual(undefined);
});
test('clear array that contains undefined and null', () => {
const array = [1, undefined, 3, null, 5];
clearArray(array);
expect(array.length).toEqual(0);
expect(array[0]).toEqual(undefined);
expect(array[4]).toEqual(undefined);
});
});
Here the updated jsPerf: http://jsperf.com/array-destroy/32 http://jsperf.com/array-destroy/152
jsPerf offline. Similar benchmark: https://jsben.ch/hyj65

A more cross-browser friendly and more optimal solution will be to use the splice method to empty the content of the array A as below:
A.splice(0, A.length);

The answers that have no less that 2739 upvotes by now are misleading and incorrect.
The question is: "How do you empty your existing array?" E.g. for A = [1,2,3,4].
Saying "A = [] is the answer" is ignorant and absolutely incorrect. [] == [] is false.
This is because these two arrays are two separate, individual objects, with their own two identities, taking up their own space in the digital world, each on its own.
Let's say your mother asks you to empty the trash can.
You don't bring in a new one as if you've done what you've been asked for.
Instead, you empty the trash can.
You don't replace the filled one with a new empty can, and you don't take the label "A" from the filled can and stick it to the new one as in A = [1,2,3,4]; A = [];
Emptying an array object is the easiest thing ever:
A.length = 0;
This way, the can under "A" is not only empty, but also as clean as new!
Furthermore, you are not required to remove the trash by hand until the can is empty! You were asked to empty the existing one, completely, in one turn, not to pick up the trash until the can gets empty, as in:
while(A.length > 0) {
A.pop();
}
Nor, to put your left hand at the bottom of the trash, holding it with your right at the top to be able to pull its content out as in:
A.splice(0, A.length);
No, you were asked to empty it:
A.length = 0;
This is the only code that correctly empties the contents of a given JavaScript array.

Performance test:
http://jsperf.com/array-clear-methods/3
a = []; // 37% slower
a.length = 0; // 89% slower
a.splice(0, a.length) // 97% slower
while (a.length > 0) {
a.pop();
} // Fastest

You can add this to your JavaScript file to allow your arrays to be "cleared":
Array.prototype.clear = function() {
this.splice(0, this.length);
};
Then you can use it like this:
var list = [1, 2, 3];
list.clear();
Or if you want to be sure you don't destroy something:
if (!Array.prototype.clear) {
Array.prototype.clear = function() {
this.splice(0, this.length);
};
}
Lots of people think you shouldn't modify native objects (like Array), and I'm inclined to agree. Please use caution in deciding how to handle this.

You can easily create a function to do that for you, change the length or even add it to native Array as remove() function for reuse.
Imagine you have this array:
var arr = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; //the array
OK, just simply run this:
arr.length = 0; //change the length
and the result is:
[] //result
easy way to empty an array...
Also using loop which is not necessary but just another way to do that:
/* could be arr.pop() or arr.splice(0)
don't need to return as main array get changed */
function remove(arr) {
while(arr.length) {
arr.shift();
}
}
There are also tricky way which you can think about, for example something like this:
arr.splice(0, arr.length); //[]
So if arr has 5 items, it will splice 5 items from 0, which means nothing will remain in the array.
Also other ways like simply reassign the array for example:
arr = []; //[]
If you look at the Array functions, there are many other ways to do this, but the most recommended one could be changing the length.
As I said in the first place, you can also prototype remove() as it's the answer to your question. you can simply choose one of the methods above and prototype it to Array object in JavaScript, something like:
Array.prototype.remove = Array.prototype.remove || function() {
this.splice(0, this.length);
};
and you can simply call it like this to empty any array in your javascript application:
arr.remove(); //[]

If you are using
a = [];
Then you are assigning new array reference to a, if reference in a is already assigned to any other variable, then it will not empty that array too and hence garbage collector will not collect that memory.
For ex.
var a=[1,2,3];
var b=a;
a=[];
console.log(b);// It will print [1,2,3];
or
a.length = 0;
When we specify a.length, we are just resetting boundaries of the array and memory for rest array elements will be connected by garbage collector.
Instead of these two solutions are better.
a.splice(0,a.length)
and
while(a.length > 0) {
a.pop();
}
As per previous answer by kenshou.html, second method is faster.

There is a lot of confusion and misinformation regarding the while;pop/shift performance both in answers and comments. The while/pop solution has (as expected) the worst performance. What's actually happening is that setup runs only once for each sample that runs the snippet in a loop. eg:
var arr = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
arr.push(Math.random());
}
for (var j = 0; j < 1000; j++) {
while (arr.length > 0) {
arr.pop(); // this executes 100 times, not 100000
}
}
I have created a new test that works correctly :
http://jsperf.com/empty-javascript-array-redux
Warning: even in this version of the test you can't actually see the real difference because cloning the array takes up most of the test time. It still shows that splice is the fastest way to clear the array (not taking [] into consideration because while it is the fastest it's not actually clearing the existing array).

Array.prototype.clear = function() {
this.length = 0;
};
And call it: array.clear();

In case you are interested in the memory allocation, you may compare each approach using something like this jsfiddle in conjunction with chrome dev tools' timeline tab. You will want to use the trash bin icon at the bottom to force a garbage collection after 'clearing' the array. This should give you a more definite answer for the browser of your choice. A lot of answers here are old and I wouldn't rely on them but rather test as in #tanguy_k's answer above.
(for an intro to the aforementioned tab you can check out here)
Stackoverflow forces me to copy the jsfiddle so here it is:
<html>
<script>
var size = 1000*100
window.onload = function() {
document.getElementById("quantifier").value = size
}
function scaffold()
{
console.log("processing Scaffold...");
a = new Array
}
function start()
{
size = document.getElementById("quantifier").value
console.log("Starting... quantifier is " + size);
console.log("starting test")
for (i=0; i<size; i++){
a[i]="something"
}
console.log("done...")
}
function tearDown()
{
console.log("processing teardown");
a.length=0
}
</script>
<body>
<span style="color:green;">Quantifier:</span>
<input id="quantifier" style="color:green;" type="text"></input>
<button onclick="scaffold()">Scaffold</button>
<button onclick="start()">Start</button>
<button onclick="tearDown()">Clean</button>
<br/>
</body>
</html>
And you should take note that it may depend on the type of the array elements, as javascript manages strings differently than other primitive types, not to mention arrays of objects. The type may affect what happens.

Use a modified version of Jan's initial suggestion:
var originalLength = A.length;
for (var i = originalLength; i > 0; i--) {
A.pop();
}
Terser:
for (let i = A.length; i > 0;A.pop(),i--) {}
Or here's another take:
while(!A[Symbol.iterator]().next().done)A.shift()

A.splice(0);
I just did this on some code I am working on. It cleared the array.

If you use constants then you have no choice:
const numbers = [1, 2, 3]
You can not reasign:
numbers = []
You can only truncate:
numbers.length = 0

To Empty a Current memory location of an array use: 'myArray.length = 0' or 'myArray.pop() UN-till its length is 0'
length : You can set the length property to truncate an array at any time. When you extend an array by changing its length property, the number of actual elements increases.
pop() : The pop method removes the last element from an array and returns that returns the removed value.
shift() : The shift method removes the element at the zeroeth index and shifts the values at consecutive indexes down, then returns the removed value.
Example:
var arr = ['77'];
arr.length = 20;
console.log("Increasing : ", arr); // (20) ["77", empty × 19]
arr.length = 12;
console.log("Truncating : ", arr); // (12) ["77", empty × 11]
var mainArr = new Array();
mainArr = ['1', '2', '3', '4'];
var refArr = mainArr;
console.log('Current', mainArr, 'Refered', refArr);
refArr.length = 3;
console.log('Length: ~ Current', mainArr, 'Refered', refArr);
mainArr.push('0');
console.log('Push to the End of Current Array Memory Location \n~ Current', mainArr, 'Refered', refArr);
mainArr.poptill_length(0);
console.log('Empty Array \n~ Current', mainArr, 'Refered', refArr);
Array.prototype.poptill_length = function (e) {
while (this.length) {
if( this.length == e ) break;
console.log('removed last element:', this.pop());
}
};
new Array() | [] Create an Array with new memory location by using Array constructor or array literal.
mainArr = []; // a new empty array is addressed to mainArr.
var arr = new Array('10'); // Array constructor
arr.unshift('1'); // add to the front
arr.push('15'); // add to the end
console.log("After Adding : ", arr); // ["1", "10", "15"]
arr.pop(); // remove from the end
arr.shift(); // remove from the front
console.log("After Removing : ", arr); // ["10"]
var arrLit = ['14', '17'];
console.log("array literal « ", indexedItem( arrLit ) ); // {0,14}{1,17}
function indexedItem( arr ) {
var indexedStr = "";
arr.forEach(function(item, index, array) {
indexedStr += "{"+index+","+item+"}";
console.log(item, index);
});
return indexedStr;
}
slice() : By using slice function we get an shallow copy of elements from the original array, with new memory address, So that any modification on cloneArr will not affect to an actual|original array.
var shallowCopy = mainArr.slice(); // this is how to make a copy
var cloneArr = mainArr.slice(0, 3);
console.log('Main', mainArr, '\tCloned', cloneArr);
cloneArr.length = 0; // Clears current memory location of an array.
console.log('Main', mainArr, '\tCloned', cloneArr);

I'm surprised no one has suggested this yet:
let xs = [1,2,3,4];
for (let i in xs)
delete xs[i];
This yields an array in quite a different state from the other solutions. In a sense, the array has been 'emptied':
xs
=> Array [ <4 empty slots> ]
[...xs]
=> Array [ undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined ]
xs.length
=> 4
xs[0]
=> ReferenceError: reference to undefined property xs[0]
You can produce an equivalent array with [,,,,] or Array(4)

how to remove javascript array element?

I have an array of objects and I am removing elements based on object value, without knowing which element it is.
So... those lovely people who flagged my question as duplicate and suggest I read How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript? are not helping.
My question... again...
I have an array of objects
I want to search and remove specific elements from the array. I have a solution that is long winded (loop thru the array once, make a list of element id's, then slice one by one in another loop). I am hoping there is another method (enhance my skillset too).
myarray.filter(function(item)
{
if( item.flag==="Y" )
{
// how to delete element from myarray
// delete implies remove it from myarray
}
});
All help appreciated =)

You have at least two options:
Create a new array with filter
The first is to create a new array containing only the entries you want. You're already on the right track with filter:
myArray = myArray.filter(function(item) {
return item.flag !== "Y";
});
The new array will only have the entries that the callback returned a truthy value for. In this case, only ones whose flag is !== "Y". Entries whose flag is === "Y" will be left out of it.
Note that if you have other references to this same array in other variables, they will continue to point to the old array. Only myArray (in the above) gets a reference to the new array.
Modify the existing array with splice and a loop
The second is to use a while loop and splice:
var n = 0;
while (n < myArray.length) {
if (myArray[n].flag === "Y") {
// Remove it
myArray.splice(n, 1);
} else {
// Move to next
++n;
}
}
Note we don't move to next if we remove one, because we need to test the one after it (which is now at the previous index).
Or as Nina points out in a comment, a for loop going backward:
for (var n = myArray.length - 1; n >= 0; --n) {
if (myArray[n].flag === "Y") {
// Remove it
myArray.splice(n, 1);
}
}
In that case, since we're modifying the array (not creating a new one), the changes will be visible through any reference to that same array, not just myArray. (Since they all point to the same object, which we modified the state of.)

Remove object in array by its property-value:
Remove value: 30:
arr.splice(arr.map(el => el.value).indexOf(30), 1);
DEMO
Remove name: "John":
arr.splice(arr.map(el => el.name).indexOf("John"), 1);

Get first element of a sparse JavaScript array

I have an array of objects in javascript. I use jquery.
How do i get the first element in the array? I cant use the array index - as I assign each elements index when I am adding the objects to the array. So the indexes arent 0, 1, 2 etc.
Just need to get the first element of the array?

If you don't use sequentially numbered elements, you'll have to loop through until you hit the first one:
var firstIndex = 0;
while (firstIndex < myarray.length && myarray[firstIndex] === undefined) {
firstIndex++;
}
if (firstIndex < myarray.length) {
var firstElement = myarray[firstIndex];
} else {
// no elements.
}
or some equivalently silly construction. This gets you the first item's index, which you might or might not care about it.
If this is something you need to do often, you should keep a lookaside reference to the current first valid index, so this becomes an O(1) operation instead of O(n) every time. If you're frequently needing to iterate through a truly sparse array, consider another data structure, like keeping an object alongside it that back-maps ordinal results to indexes, or something that fits your data.

The filter method works with sparse arrays.
var first = array.filter(x => true)[0];

Have you considered:
function getFirstIndex(array){
var result;
if(array instanceof Array){
for(var i in array){
result = i;
break;
}
} else {
return null;
}
return result;
}
?
And as a way to get the last element in the array:
function getLastIndex(array){
var result;
if(array instanceof Array){
result = array.push("");
array.pop;
}
} else {
return null;
}
return result;
}
Neither of these uses jquery.

Object.keys(array)[0] returns the index (in String form) of the first element in the sparse array.
var array = [];
array[2] = true;
array[5] = undefined;
var keys = Object.keys(array); // => ["2", "5"]
var first = Number(keys[0]); // => 2
var last = Number(keys[keys.length - 1]); // => 5

I was also facing a similar problem and was surprised that no one has considered the following:
var testArray = [];
testArray [1245]= 31;
testArray[2045] = 45;
for(index in testArray){
console.log(index+','+testArray[index])
}
The above will produce
1245,31
2045,45
If needed you could exist after the first iteration if all that was required but generally we need to know where in the array to begin.

This is a proposal with ES5 method with Array#some.
The code gets the first nonsparse element and the index. The iteration stops immediately with returning true in the callback:
var a = [, , 22, 33],
value,
index;
a.some(function (v, i) {
value = v;
index = i;
return true;
});
console.log(index, value);

If you find yourself needing to do manipulation of arrays a lot, you might be interested in the Underscore library. It provides utility methods for manipulating arrays, for example compact:
var yourArray = [];
yourArray[10] = "foo";
var firstValue = _.compact(yourArray)[0];
However, it does sound like you are doing something strange when you are constructing your array. Perhaps Array.push would help you out?