We Keep Coding

How to start over again a loop?

I have a JSON file which stores an array of picture URLs. I want to rotate through these links, changing the background of a div every 4 seconds.
I'm having no trouble accessing the JSON file or changing the background of the div. However, I can't seem to figure out how to restart at the beginning of the array after every picture has been shown.
How should I approach this problem?
$.getJSON(json, function (data) {
var arr = $.map(data, function (el) { return el; })
, i = 0;
var changeObj = function() {
i++;
var url = 'url("' + arr[i].url + '")';
$this.css({
backgroundImage: url
});
};
setInterval(changeObj, 4000);
});
Here's a demo

Let's assume your have already parsed your JSON into an array of URLs called myPictureArray and you have written a function called swapInNewPicture, which takes a URL of an image as its argument. (I'm not going to write these functions for you.)
var rotatePictures = function (arr) {
var length = arr.length
, i = 0;
setInterval(function () {
i = (i + 1) % length;
swapInNewPicture(arr[i]);
}, 4000)
}
Now, all you have to do is call rotatePictures(myPictureArray) after you finish parsing your JSON.

Use the modulus operation so it wraps around when it reaches the end of the array. Replace:
i++;
with:
i = (i + 1) % arr.length;
This is basically equivalent to:
i++;
if (i == arr.length) {
i = 0;
}
BTW, you can simplify the setInterval call to:
setInterval(changeObj, 4000);

JS crashes sometimes with Timer scramble

My Javascript timer is for people with a rubiks cube with generates a scramble (nevermind all this, but just to tell you I'm generating after each solve a new scramble will be generated) and my scrambles do actually have a while (true) statement. So that does crash my script, but it 95/100 times stops just before the script crashes but I don't wanna have any times.
Let me explain a bit more detailed about the problem.
Problem: javascript crashes because my script takes too long to generate a scramble.
Below you have 3 functions I use.
This function generates a scramble with the Fisher-Yates shuffle.
Timer.prototype.generateScramble = function(array) {
for (var i = array.length - 1; i > 0; i--) {
var j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1));
var temp = array[i];
array[i] = array[j];
array[j] = temp;
}
return array;
};
This function validates the input e.g. I receive an array as the following:
Here I only have to check the first character. That's why I use the seconds [ ] notation. I don't want people get an F with an F2 e.g.
var scr = ["F","R","U","B","L","D","F2","R2","U2","B2","L2","D2","F'","R'","U'","B'","L'","D'"]
Timer.prototype.validateScramble2 = function(array) {
var last = array.length-1;
for (var i = 0; i < array.length-1; i++) {
if (array[i][0] == array[i+1][0]) {
return false;
}
}
for (var i = 0; i < array.length-2; i++) {
if (array[i][0] == array[i+2][0]) {
return false;
}
}
if (array[0][0] == [last][0]) {
return false;
}
return true;
};
The above functions are just waiting to be called. Well in the function below I use them.
Timer.prototype.updateScramble2 = function(scrambleArr, len, type) {
var self = this;
var scramble = '', j, updatedArr = [];
while (updatedArr.length < len) {
j = (Math.floor(Math.random() * scrambleArr.length));
updatedArr.push(scrambleArr[j]);
}
while (!self.validateScramble2(updatedArr)) {
updatedArr = self.generateScramble(updatedArr);
}
for (var i = 0; i < updatedArr.length; i++) {
scramble += updatedArr[i] + ' ';
}
scrambleDiv.innerHTML = scramble;
};
I assume you guys understand it but let me explain it briefly.
The first while-loop adds a random value from the given array(scrambleArr) into a new array called updatedArr.
The next while-loop calls the validateScramble2() function if there isn't in an array F next to an F2.
The for-loop adds them into a new variable added with a whitespace and then later we show the scramble in the div: scrambleDiv.innerHTML = scramble;
What do I need know after all this information?
Well I wanna know why my updateScramble2() functions lets my browser crash every time and what I do wrong and how I should do it.

I'm not entirely sure I understand the question, but from the way your code looks, I think you have an infinite loop going on. It appears as if validateScramble2 always returns false which causes your second loop in updateScramble2 to perpetually run.
I suggest you insert a breakpoint in your code and inspect the values. You could also insert debugger; statements in your code, works the same way. Open dev tools prior to doing these.
A suggestion is instead of using loops, use a timer. This breaks up your loop into asynchronous iterations rather than synchronous. This allows the browser breathing space for other operations. Here's an example of a forEachAsync:
function forEachAsync(array, callback){
var i = 0;
var timer = setInterval(function(){
callback.call(null, array[i]);
if(++i >= array.length) clearInterval(timer);
}, 0);
}
forEachAsync([1,2,4], function(item){
console.log(item);
});
You can take this further and use Promises instead of callbacks.

jQuery/JavaScript delay and display

I want to cycle through an array and display each element individually, and then remove it. Sort of like this fiddle, but I don't want it to go forever.
I tried using jQuery because I thought it would be easier, but I am clearly missing something. Can anyone help?
Here is my attempt, but it just goes straight to the last element in the array.
var list = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
var length = list.length;
for(i = 0; i < length; i++) {
$('#nums').html(list[i]).delay(750);
}
Oh, and I don't care if it's jQuery or vanilla JavaScript. Either is fine by me.

$(document).ready(function(){
var list = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
var length = list.length;
var i = 0;
var ivl = setInterval( function () {
if (i < length) {
$('#nums').html(list[i]).delay(750);
i++;
}
else {
clearInterval(ivl);
}
}, 750);
});

The (pretty clever) example uses the fact that the modulus operator (%) gives you remainder, which is periodic, so you can use it to cycle through your array by taking the remainder of an infinitely increasing number divided by the length of your list.
If you want it to stop, however, you can just do a check to see if you've finished cycling through the list:
var list = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
var length = list.length;
var i = 0;
var finished = false;
function repeat() {
if (!finished) {
document.getElementById('nums').innerHTML = list[i % length];
i++;
if (i === length) {
finished = true;
}
} else {
clearInterval(interval);
}
}
var interval = setInterval(repeat, 750);
<div id="nums"></div>

Late to the party but wouldn't it be better to use setTimeout rather than setInterval just in case the code executed on each iteration takes longer than the interval duration? I mean, I know it's not an issue in this instance but it's just a better/safer way to do this sort of thing.
$(document).ready(function(){
var list = [1,2,3,4,5,6];
var length = list.length;
var i = 0;
(function next(){
if (i < length){
$('#nums').html(list[i++]);
setTimeout(next,750);
}
})();
});
http://jsfiddle.net/zLexhdfp/3/

Adding a random class to element from an array that duplicates using jQuery

I'm creating a matching game and I'm trying to add a class from an array to match against.
The code I have below creates the classes I need, then randomizes them.
My problem is in the randomizeDeck function. I'm trying to add each of the classes to the specified element twice. When I console.log the code the classes gets added to the first six elements but not the last six, which I need it to do so that I have the classes to match against in the matching game I'm creating.
var cardDeck = new Array();
function createDeck() {
for (i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
cardDeck.push("card-" + i);
}
}
createDeck();
var randDeck = cardDeck.sort(randOrd);
function randomizeDeck() {
card.each(function(i){
$(this).addClass(randDeck[i]);
});
}
randomizeDeck();

I think your createDeck function needs to create 12 classes instead of 6. Just push each one twice:
function createDeck() {
for (i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
cardDeck.push("card-" + i);
cardDeck.push("card-" + i);
}
}
Then you'll have an array of 12 classes (2 each of 6 unique classes), which will be randomized and assigned to the 12 cards.

I suggest a separate variable to keep track of the index, rather that the each index. Once you've gone through the pack once, it might be a good idea to shuffle the deck again so the order is different on the second pass. YMMV.
function sortCards(randOrd) {
randDeck = cardDeck.sort(randOrd);
}
function randomizeDeck() {
var count = 0;
cards.each(function(i) {
if (i === 6) { count = 0; sortCards(randOrd); }
$(this).addClass(randDeck[count]);
count++;
});
}

Your randomizeDeck() function can be rewritten to use the same array of class names twice:
function randomizeDeck() {
card.each(function(i){
if(i < 6)
$(this).addClass(randDeck[i])
else
$(this).addClass(randDeck[i-6]);
});
}
Note: I would rewrite the variable card as $cards so that you know it's a jQuery object and in this case a collection of them. Otherwise, its hard to tell it apart from any other javascript var.

Try something like this - it's tested now updated
SEE THIS FIDDLE
http://jsfiddle.net/8XBM2/1/
var cardDeck = new Array();
function createDeck() {
for (i = 1; i <= 6; i++) {
cardDeck.push("card-" + i);
}
}
createDeck();
var randDeck = cardDeck.sort();
alert(randDeck);
function randomizeDeck() {
var x = 0;
$('div').each(function(i){
if ( i > 5) {
$(this).addClass(randDeck[x]);
x++;
} else {
$(this).addClass(randDeck[i]);
}
});
}
randomizeDeck();

Setting JavaScript Timeout limit in Google Chrome

Is it possible to increase the time out limit for JavaScript?
If I have a script that executes for more than 20/30 seconds chrome will pop-up with the unresponsable page dialog.
Making a more efficient script won't help me because the script sometimes need to iterate through a function for a million or billion times

To split the function on steps/chunks and run those inside setInterval(function(){}).
This way page will be responsive, you will be able to notify user about progress of execution and you will get your job done.
UPDATE: Here is simple function that takes
worker function executing each iteration,
chunksz - number of iteration running in single chunk
maxit - total number of iterations.
function task(worker, chunksz, maxit)
{
var idx = 0;
var xint = null;
function exec_chunk()
{
for(var n = 0; n < chunksz; ++n)
{
if(idx >= maxit) { return; }
worker(idx++);
}
setTimeout(exec_chunk,1);
}
exec_chunk();
}
Here is an example : http://jsfiddle.net/Ed9wL/
As you see you get all iterations in order.
UPDATE2:
Say you have a loop:
for(var i=0; i<100000; ++i) { ... do something ... }
then you need to wrap body of the loop into a function and call the task above with it like this:
task(function(i){ ... do something ... },100, 100000);
or like this:
function loopBody(i){ ... do something ... }
task(loopBody,100, 100000);

When you have lots of processing to do client side, you need to split out your work into separate threads. The browser only has a single thread for handling user input (events) and for processing JS. If you're processing too much JS, without yielding, the UI becomes unresponsive and the browser is not happy.
How can you allow your script to yield? The new way is to use web workers http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-workers/current-work/ . This works by creating a separate thread to run your JS, thread thread does not access to the DOM and can be run concurrently.
However, this newer technology doesn't exist in all browsers. For older browsers, you can split up your work by having the script call itself through timeouts. Whenever a timeout occurs, the script is yielding to the browser to run its events, once the browser is done, your next timeout will be triggered.
Example http://jsfiddle.net/mendesjuan/PucXf/
var list = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 500000; i++) {
list.push(Math.random());
}
function sumOfSquares(list) {
var total = 0;
for (var i = 0; i < list.length; i++) {
total += list[i] * list[i];
// DOM manipulation to make it take longer
var node = document.createElement("div");
node.innerHTML = "Sync temp value = " + total;
document.body.appendChild(node);
}
return total;
}
function sumOfSquaresAsync(arr, callback) {
var chunkSize = 1000; // Do 1000 at a time
var arrLen = arr.length;
var index = 0;
var total = 0;
nextStep();
function nextStep() {
var step = 0;
while (step < chunkSize && index < arrLen) {
total += arr[index] * arr[index];
// DOM manipulation to make it take longer
var node = document.createElement("div");
node.innerHTML = "Async temp value = " + total;
document.body.appendChild(node);
index++;
step++;
}
if (index < arrLen) {
setTimeout(nextStep, 10);
} else {
callback(total);
}
}
}
sumOfSquaresAsync(list, function(total) {console.log("Async Result: " + total)});
//console.log("Sync result" + sumOfSquares(list));
The example on jsfiddle has the synchronous call commented out, you can put it back in to see the browser come to a crawl. Notice that the asynchronous call does take a long time to complete, but it doesn't cause the long running script message and it lets you interact with the page while calculating (select text, button hover effects). You can see it printing partial results on the pane to the bottom right.
UPDATE http://jsfiddle.net/mendesjuan/PucXf/8/
Let's try to use c-smile's task function to implement sum of squares. I think he's missing a parameter, a function to call back when the task is finished. Using task allows us to create multiple chunked functions without duplicating the work of calling setTimeout and iteration.
/**
* #param {function} worker. It is passed two values, the current array index,
* and the item at that index
* #param {array} list Items to be traversed
* #param {callback} The function to call when iteration is finished;
* #param {number} maxit The number of iterations of the loop to run
* before yielding, defaults to 1000
*/
function task(worker, list, callback, maxit)
{
maxit = maxit || 1000;
var idx = 0;
exec_chunk();
function exec_chunk()
{
for(var n = 0; n < maxit; ++n)
{
if(idx >= list.length) {
callback();
return;
}
worker(idx, list[idx]);
idx++;
}
setTimeout(exec_chunk,1);
}
}
function sumOfSquaresAsync(list, callback)
{
var total = 0;
// The function that does the adding and squaring
function squareAndAdd(index, item) {
total += item * item;
// DOM manipulation to make it take longer and to see progress
var node = document.createElement("div");
node.innerHTML = "Async temp value = " + total;
document.body.appendChild(node);
}
// Let the caller know what the result is when iteration is finished
function onFinish() {
callback(total);
}
task(squareAndAdd, list, onFinish);
}
var list = [];
for (var i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
list.push(Math.random());
}
sumOfSquaresAsync(list, function(total) {
console.log("Sum of Squares is " + total);
})

If your goal is to suppress "Kill-Wait" message as quick temporary fix for your slow JavaScript then the solution is to open Tools/Developer Tools in Google Chrome and keep it open and minimized somewhere on your desktop while browsing .