So I started converting my application from ES2015 to ES6 which uses React.
I have a parent class and a child class like so,
export default class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
}
setCodeChange(newCode) {
this.setState({code: newCode});
}
login() {
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child class,
export default class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
handleCodeChange(e) {
this.props.onCodeChange(e.target.value);
}
login() {
this.props.onLogin();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<input name="code" onChange={this.handleCodeChange.bind(this)}/>
</div>
<button id="login" onClick={this.login.bind(this)}>
);
}
}
Child.propTypes = {
onCodeChange: React.PropTypes.func,
onLogin: React.PropTypes.func
};
However this causes the following error,
this.state is undefined
It refers to,
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
Any idea what could be causing this ?
You can use arrow function to bind you functions. You need to bind you functions both in child as well as parent components.
Parent:
export default class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
}
setCodeChange = (newCode) => {
this.setState({code: newCode});
}
login = () => {
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child
export default class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
handleCodeChange = (e) => {
this.props.onCodeChange(e.target.value);
}
login = () => {
this.props.onLogin();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<input name="code" onChange={this.handleCodeChange}/>
</div>
<button id="login" onClick={this.login}>
);
}
}
Child.propTypes = {
onCodeChange: React.PropTypes.func,
onLogin: React.PropTypes.func
};
There are other ways to bind the functions as well such as the one you are using but you need to do that for parent component too as <Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange.bind(this)} onLogin={this.login.bind(this)} />
or you can specify binding in the constructor as
Parent:
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
this.setCodeChange = this.setCodeChange.bind(this);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
Child
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleCodeChange = this.handleCodeChange.bind(this);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
I agree with all different solutions given by #Shubham Kathri except direct binding in render.
You are not recommended to bind your functions directly in render. You are recommended to bind it in constructor always because if you do binding directly in render then whenever your component renders Webpack will create a new function/object in bundled file thus the Webpack bundle file size grows. For many reasons your component re-renders eg: doing setState but if you place it in constructor it gets called called only once.
The below implementation is not recommended
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange.bind(this)} onLogin={this.login.bind(this)} />
Do it in constructor always and use the ref wherever required
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
this.setCodeChange = this.setCodeChange.bind(this);
}
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
If you are using ES6 then manual binding is not required but if you want you can. You can use arrow functions if you want to stay away with scope related issues and manual function/object bindings.
Sorry if there are any typos I am answering in my mobile
Related
I'm building an app with React, and getting a TypeError that my function doesn't exist. My function starts in here where I pass it to a child component:
class InvoiceScreen extends Component {
state = {
numberOfInvoices: InvoiceData.length,
currentDisplay: <InvoiceList
openInvoice={this.openInvoice}
/>
};
checkInvoiceLength = () => {
var isEmpty = document.getElementById("InvoiceList").innerHTML === "";
if (isEmpty == false) {
this.setState({display: "untoggled"})
}
else if (isEmpty == true) {
this.setState({hasInvoices: "toggled"})
}
}
openInvoice = (int) => {
this.setState({currentDisplay:
<InvoiceDetails
idNumber={InvoiceData[int].id}
description={InvoiceData[int].description}
street={InvoiceData[int].senderAddress.street}
city={InvoiceData[int].senderAddress.city}
postCode={InvoiceData[int].senderAddress.postCode}
country={InvoiceData[int].senderAddress.country}
createdAt={InvoiceData[int].createdAt}
paymentDue={InvoiceData[int].paymentDue}
clientStreet={InvoiceData[int].clientAddress.street}
clientCity={InvoiceData[int].clientAddress.city}
clientPostCode={InvoiceData[int].clientAddress.postCode}
clientCountry={InvoiceData[int].clientAddress.country}
clientEmail={InvoiceData[int].clientEmail}
items={InvoiceData[int].items}
total={InvoiceData[int].total}
/>})
}
render() {
return(
<div className="InvoiceScreen">
<IconBar />
<div className="DisplayArea">
{this.state.currentDisplay}
</div>
</div>
)
}
}
Then from this component, I pass it down to multiple components created through the map function
class InvoiceList extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
}
render() {
return(
<div className="InvoiceListScreen">
<InvoiceOptions numberOfInvoices={this.props.numberOfInvoices} />
<div id="InvoiceList">
{InvoiceData.map((invoice, index,) =>
<InvoiceBar
openInvoice={this.props.openInvoice}
key={index}
position={index}
idNumber={invoice.id}
clientName={invoice.clientName}
paymentDue={invoice.paymentDue}
price={Formatter.format(invoice.total)}
status={invoice.status.charAt(0).toUpperCase() + invoice.status.slice(1).toLowerCase()}
/>
)}
</div>
</div>
)
}
}
And then finally inside of the mapped components, I call it as an onClick
class InvoiceBar extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
}
render() {
return(
<div className="InvoiceBar" onClick={() => this.props.openInvoice(this.props.position)}>
<h4 className="idNumber"><span className="Hashtag">#</span>{this.props.idNumber}</h4>
<p className="clientName">{this.props.clientName}</p>
<div className="DueAndPrice">
<p className="paymentDue">Due {this.props.paymentDue}</p>
<h3 className="price">{this.props.price}</h3>
</div>
<PaymentStatus status={this.props.status} />
</div>
)
}
}
And then like I said, I'm given a TypeError saying that it isn't a function. I'm wondering if it has something to do with the function being passed as props from outside of the map function in the second component. Can someone please enlighten me on what it is I'm doing wrong?
The problem is that class fields run in order in which they're listed. They're not like normal methods, which get defined on the prototype ahead of time. For a simplified version:
class InvoiceScreen extends Component {
state = {
openInvoice: this.openInvoice
};
openInvoice = () => {
// some function
}
desugars to:
class InvoiceScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
openInvoice: this.openInvoice
};
this.openInvoice = () => {
// some function
}
See the problem? You're defining this.state before you're defining this.openInvoice.
Easiest solution would be to move the definition of this.state to the bottom:
class InvoiceScreen extends Component {
// PUT ALL OTHER METHOD DEFINITIONS HERE
// then just before the end of the component:
state = {
numberOfInvoices: InvoiceData.length,
currentDisplay: <InvoiceList
openInvoice={this.openInvoice}
/>
};
}
That said, putting a React component into state is really, really weird. Consider a different approach if at all possible.
So I started converting my application from ES2015 to ES6 which uses React.
I have a parent class and a child class like so,
export default class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
}
setCodeChange(newCode) {
this.setState({code: newCode});
}
login() {
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child class,
export default class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
handleCodeChange(e) {
this.props.onCodeChange(e.target.value);
}
login() {
this.props.onLogin();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<input name="code" onChange={this.handleCodeChange.bind(this)}/>
</div>
<button id="login" onClick={this.login.bind(this)}>
);
}
}
Child.propTypes = {
onCodeChange: React.PropTypes.func,
onLogin: React.PropTypes.func
};
However this causes the following error,
this.state is undefined
It refers to,
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
Any idea what could be causing this ?
You can use arrow function to bind you functions. You need to bind you functions both in child as well as parent components.
Parent:
export default class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
}
setCodeChange = (newCode) => {
this.setState({code: newCode});
}
login = () => {
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child
export default class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
handleCodeChange = (e) => {
this.props.onCodeChange(e.target.value);
}
login = () => {
this.props.onLogin();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<input name="code" onChange={this.handleCodeChange}/>
</div>
<button id="login" onClick={this.login}>
);
}
}
Child.propTypes = {
onCodeChange: React.PropTypes.func,
onLogin: React.PropTypes.func
};
There are other ways to bind the functions as well such as the one you are using but you need to do that for parent component too as <Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange.bind(this)} onLogin={this.login.bind(this)} />
or you can specify binding in the constructor as
Parent:
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
this.setCodeChange = this.setCodeChange.bind(this);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
Child
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleCodeChange = this.handleCodeChange.bind(this);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
I agree with all different solutions given by #Shubham Kathri except direct binding in render.
You are not recommended to bind your functions directly in render. You are recommended to bind it in constructor always because if you do binding directly in render then whenever your component renders Webpack will create a new function/object in bundled file thus the Webpack bundle file size grows. For many reasons your component re-renders eg: doing setState but if you place it in constructor it gets called called only once.
The below implementation is not recommended
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange.bind(this)} onLogin={this.login.bind(this)} />
Do it in constructor always and use the ref wherever required
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
this.setCodeChange = this.setCodeChange.bind(this);
}
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
If you are using ES6 then manual binding is not required but if you want you can. You can use arrow functions if you want to stay away with scope related issues and manual function/object bindings.
Sorry if there are any typos I am answering in my mobile
So I started converting my application from ES2015 to ES6 which uses React.
I have a parent class and a child class like so,
export default class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
}
setCodeChange(newCode) {
this.setState({code: newCode});
}
login() {
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child class,
export default class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
handleCodeChange(e) {
this.props.onCodeChange(e.target.value);
}
login() {
this.props.onLogin();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<input name="code" onChange={this.handleCodeChange.bind(this)}/>
</div>
<button id="login" onClick={this.login.bind(this)}>
);
}
}
Child.propTypes = {
onCodeChange: React.PropTypes.func,
onLogin: React.PropTypes.func
};
However this causes the following error,
this.state is undefined
It refers to,
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
Any idea what could be causing this ?
You can use arrow function to bind you functions. You need to bind you functions both in child as well as parent components.
Parent:
export default class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
}
setCodeChange = (newCode) => {
this.setState({code: newCode});
}
login = () => {
if (this.state.code == "") {
// Some functionality
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
</div>
);
}
}
Child
export default class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
}
handleCodeChange = (e) => {
this.props.onCodeChange(e.target.value);
}
login = () => {
this.props.onLogin();
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<input name="code" onChange={this.handleCodeChange}/>
</div>
<button id="login" onClick={this.login}>
);
}
}
Child.propTypes = {
onCodeChange: React.PropTypes.func,
onLogin: React.PropTypes.func
};
There are other ways to bind the functions as well such as the one you are using but you need to do that for parent component too as <Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange.bind(this)} onLogin={this.login.bind(this)} />
or you can specify binding in the constructor as
Parent:
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
code: ''
};
this.setCodeChange = this.setCodeChange.bind(this);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
Child
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.handleCodeChange = this.handleCodeChange.bind(this);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
}
I agree with all different solutions given by #Shubham Kathri except direct binding in render.
You are not recommended to bind your functions directly in render. You are recommended to bind it in constructor always because if you do binding directly in render then whenever your component renders Webpack will create a new function/object in bundled file thus the Webpack bundle file size grows. For many reasons your component re-renders eg: doing setState but if you place it in constructor it gets called called only once.
The below implementation is not recommended
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange.bind(this)} onLogin={this.login.bind(this)} />
Do it in constructor always and use the ref wherever required
constructor(props){
super(props);
this.login = this.login.bind(this);
this.setCodeChange = this.setCodeChange.bind(this);
}
<Child onCodeChange={this.setCodeChange} onLogin={this.login} />
If you are using ES6 then manual binding is not required but if you want you can. You can use arrow functions if you want to stay away with scope related issues and manual function/object bindings.
Sorry if there are any typos I am answering in my mobile
import React from "react";
import ReactDOM from "react-dom";
class NestedComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.childMethod = this.childMethod.bind(this);
}
childMethod() {
alert("Child method one ran");
}
render() {
return <div>NestedComponent</div>;
}
}
class NestedComponentTwo extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.childMethod = this.childMethod.bind(this);
}
childMethod() {
alert("Child method two ran");
}
render() {
return <div>NestedComponentTwo</div>;
}
}
class WrappingComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.runMethod = this.runMethod.bind(this);
}
runMethod() {
let child = this.props.children[0];
/** Always returns as undefined */
//if (typeof child.childMethod == "function") {
// child.childMethod();
//}
/**
* EDIT: Close, however the this binding seems to not be working. I can however provide the childs props to the childMethod and work with that.
*/
if(typeof child.type.prototype.childMethod == "funciton"){
child.type.prototype.childMethod();
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.children}
<button onClick={this.runMethod}>run</button>
</div>
);
}
}
const App = ({}) => {
return (
<div>
<WrappingComponent>
<NestedComponent />
<NestedComponentTwo />
</WrappingComponent>
</div>
);
};
if (document.getElementById("example")) {
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById("example"));
}
So the goal is to have optional methods attached to a nested component that can execute from the wrapping component, almost like an event emmiter. For some reason though, the method that exists on the child component claims not to exist. However whenever I log the child component pulled from the array of the this.props.children the prototype has the method listed.
Am I missing a special way to access methods of children components through a methods variable perhaps?
Found the variable I can use to access it. If anyone has any more insight into this, or reasons why what I am doing is poor practice please let me know.
Editing the question where this is needed, but the item below is accessing the function of the child:
child.type.prototype.childMethod
Does not appear to maintain the this binding. Passing props down does work however.
You should manage all of this logic in the top level component (the App component)
class NestedComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.childMethod = this.childMethod.bind(this);
}
childMethod() {
alert("Child method one ran");
}
render() {
return <div>NestedComponent</div>;
}
}
class NestedComponentTwo extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.childMethod = this.childMethod.bind(this);
}
childMethod() {
alert("Child method two ran");
}
render() {
return <div>NestedComponentTwo</div>;
}
}
class WrappingComponent extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.children}
<button onClick={this.props.onClick}>run</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.runMethod = this.runMethod.bind(this);
}
runMethod() {
if (this.nestedComponent) {
this.nestedComponent.childMethod();
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<WrappingComponent onClick={this.runMethod}>
<NestedComponent ref={el => this.nestedComponent = el} />
<NestedComponentTwo />
</WrappingComponent>
</div>
);
}
};
if (document.getElementById("example")) {
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById("example"));
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="example"></div>
Moreover ref with string attribute is deprecated https://reactjs.org/docs/refs-and-the-dom.html#legacy-api-string-refs
So I have one root component and two child components. I have trying to get one child to call a method that is up in in the root component and update the state up in the root component, and pass the updated down to the other component, but I am getting the following error.
What could be the issue?
warning.js?8a56:36 Warning: setState(...): Can only update a mounted or mounting component. This usually means you called setState() on an unmounted component. This is a no-op. Please check the code for the firstChild component.
Here is the code:
firstChild.js
export default class firstChild extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
nameText: '',
}
}
nameChange(event) {
this.setState({
nameText: event.target.value,
})
}
submitClick() {
var nameText = this.state.nameText;
this.props.saveName(nameText)
this.setState({nameText: ''});
}
render() {
var st = this.state;
var pr = this.props;
return (
<input
placeholder='Enter Name'
onChange={this.nameChange.bind(this)}
value={this.state.nameText}
/>
<button
onClick={this.submitClick.bind(this)}
/>
And in root component, App.js:
export default class App extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
submitSuccess: false
}
}
saveName(nameText) {
this.setState({submitSuccess: true});
}
render() {
var props = {};
props.submitSuccess = this.state.submitSuccess;
return (
<div>
<firstChild
saveName={this.saveName.bind(this)}
/>
{React.Children.map(this.props.children, function(child) {
return React.cloneElement(child, props);
})}
</div>
)
}
}
And my secondChild.js:
export default class secondChild extends React.Component {
static propTypes = {
submitSuccess: React.PropTypes.bool.isRequired,
}
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
}
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.submitSuccess}
</div>
)
}
}
Fisrt, rename all your React components as Camel Case like this.
class firstChild ... --> class FristChild
<fristChild> --> <FristChild>
Second, in your FirstChild render method, you should wrap your elements into an enclosing tag like this:
class FirstChild extends Component {
render(){
return (
<div>
<input ... />
<button ... />
</div>
)
}
}
Third, when you use cloneElement upon this.props.children, you should use Proptypes.<type> in your secondChildren instead of Propstypes.<type>.isRequired. Check it here to see why.
class SecondChild extends Component {
static propTypes = {
submitSuccess: React.PropTypes.bool, // remove isRequired
}
}
Regardless all above, I have tested your code and it works fine.
You can try and use componentWillUnmount lifecycle function in order to check when the component is unmounted.
You can also use a flag to signal that the component is unmounted before setting the state:
saveName(nameText) {
if (!this.isUnmounted){
this.setState({submitSuccess: true});
}
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this.isUnmounted = true;
}