We Keep Coding

Using appUser scoped tokens in Smooch

I am developing a widget that users in my company can use to communicate with end-users through Smooch.
The widget is accessible through the web browser and the communication goes mostly through a layer developed in node. However, I was trying to send attachments directly to Smooch to reduce the load in the server.
As I understand, it is necessary to use a token with a appUser scope to avoid issues with CORS.
I create the token using the following code
app.get('/getjwt', (req, res) => {
var token = jwt.sign({ scope: 'appUser', userId: req.body.userId }, SECRET, { header: { 'alg': 'HS256', 'type': 'JWT', 'kid': '[app key ID]' } });
res.send({ jwt: token });
});
I try to use the generated token (using Postman for tests) by making a request with Authorization Bearer [my generated token] and I get the following error:
{
"error": {
"code": "invalid_auth",
"description": "Invalid JWT header. Missing key id (kid)"
}
}
I have tried changing the 'kid' value to the app ID, the API key ID, and the API key Secret and I'm always getting the same error. What am I missing? Am I supposed to pass the Key ID somewhere else?
Thank you,

Your code works fine for me, what version of jsonwebtoken are you using? In v6.0.0 the headers option was renamed to header, so if you're using 5.x or lower your code should look like this instead
var token = jwt.sign({ scope: 'appUser', userId: req.body.userId }, SECRET, { headers: { 'alg': 'HS256', 'type': 'JWT', 'kid': '[app key ID]' } });
That said, Smooch already provides a fully functional web messenger / widget that you should use instead of attempting to build your own. It provides event hooks and methods to build a fully custom UI if that's what you're trying to achieve. See https://docs.smooch.io/guide/web-messenger/ and https://www.npmjs.com/package/smooch

Unable to query Google Search Console API using a Service Account

I need to retrieve some data from Google Search Console (Webmaster Tools) using a service account.
So far I've been able to retrieve an access_token for the service account which I need to append to the url of the request. The problem is that I can't find a way to do so, this is the code i'm using:
function retrieveSearchesByQuery(token)
{
gapi.client.webmasters.searchanalytics.query(
{
'access_token': token,
'siteUrl': 'http://www.WEBSITE.com',
'fields': 'responseAggregationType,rows',
'resource': {
'startDate': formatDate(cSDate),
'endDate': formatDate(cEDate),
'dimensions': [
'date'
]
}
})
.then(function(response) {
console.log(response);
})
.then(null, function(err) {
console.log(err);
});
}
This is the url called by the function:
https://content.googleapis.com/webmasters/v3/sites/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.WEBSITE.com/searchAnalytics/query?fields=responseAggregationType%2Crows&alt=json"
Instead it should be something like this:
https://content.googleapis.com/webmasters/v3/sites/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.WEBSITE.com/searchAnalytics/query?fields=responseAggregationType%2Crows&alt=json&access_token=XXX"
The gapi.client.webmasters.searchanalytics.query doesn't recognize 'access_token' as a valid key thus it doesn't append it to the url and that's why I get a 401 Unauthorized as response.
If I use 'key' instead of 'access_token' the parameter gets appended to the url but 'key' is used for OAuth2 authentication so the service account token I pass is not valid.
Does anyone have a solution or a workaround for this?

If your application requests private data, the request must be authorized by an authenticated user who has access to that data. As specified in the documentation of the Search Console API, your application must use OAuth 2.0 to authorize requests. No other authorization protocols are supported.
If you application is correctly configured, when using the Google API, an authenticated request looks exactly like an unauthenticated request. As stated in the documentation, if the application has received an OAuth 2.0 token, the JavaScript client library includes it in the request automatically.
You're mentioning that you have retrieved an access_token, if correctly received, the API client will automatically send this token for you, you don't have to append it yourself.
A very basic workflow to authenticate and once authenticated, send a request would looks like the following code. The Search Console API can use the following scopes: https://www.googleapis.com/auth/webmasters and https://www.googleapis.com/auth/webmasters.readonly.
var clientId = 'YOUR CLIENT ID';
var apiKey = 'YOUR API KEY';
var scopes = 'https://www.googleapis.com/auth/webmasters';
function auth() {
// Set the API key.
gapi.client.setApiKey(apiKey);
// Start the auth process using our client ID & the required scopes.
gapi.auth2.init({
client_id: clientId,
scope: scopes
})
.then(function () {
// We're authenticated, let's go...
// Load the webmasters API, then query the API
gapi.client.load('webmasters', 'v3')
.then(retrieveSearchesByQuery);
});
}
// Load the API client and auth library
gapi.load('client:auth2', auth);
At this point, your retrieveSearchesByQuery function will need to be modified since it doesn't need to get a token by argument anymore in order to pass it in the query. The JavaScript client library should include it in the request automatically.
You can also use the API Explorer to check what parameters are supported for a specific query and check the associated request.
If you need to use an externally generated access token, which should be the case with a Service Account, you need to use the gapi.auth.setToken method to sets the OAuth 2.0 token object yourself for the application:
gapi.auth.setToken(token_Object);

How do I use Cognito with the generated Javascript SDK?

I couldn't find any documentation that showed how to do this so I tried my best to figure it out (is this not a common use case)? I've set up my resource to use IAM authentication, set up CORS, etc. Then I deployed it, and downloaded the generated the SDK.
On the client-side I'm using the credentials from AWS.CognitoIdentityCredentials with apigClientFactory.newClient. When I try to post to my resource, I get a 403 error response with no body.
The response headers contain: x-amz-ErrorType: UnrecognizedClientException
Could this error possibly be coming from some other AWS service (do they bubble up like that)? If so, how can I tell which one? What else might be causing the error?
The code I'm using test test client-side looks like this:
function onFacebookLogin(fbtoken) {
// get cognito credentials
AWS.config.credentials = new AWS.CognitoIdentityCredentials({
IdentityPoolId: 'us-east-1:abcd6789-1234-567a-b123-12ab34cd56ef',
Logins: {'graph.facebook.com': fbtoken}
});
AWS.config.credentials.get(function(err) {
if (err) {return console.error('Credentials error: ', err);}
/* I'm assuming that this is what I use for accessKey and secretKey */
var credentials = AWS.config.credentials;
apigClient = apigClientFactory.newClient({
accessKey: credentials.accessKeyId,
secretKey: credentials.secretAccessKey
});
});
}

I think what might be happening is you're not setting the sessionToken field with the access key and secret key. Can you try setting it up to look like the below example and see if that works?
var client = apigClientFactory.newClient({
accessKey: ACCESS_KEY,
secretKey: SECRET_KEY,
sessionToken: SESSION_TOKEN
});
This previous question has a bit more detail, if needed.

Yes I believe the sessionToken is required.
Here's a basic example using cognito unauthenticated identities: https://github.com/rpgreen/aws-recipes/blob/master/app/index.html

Flickr API throws up "Invalid API Key (Key has invalid format)" when POSTing data with oauth signing

I can't seem to find this answered anywhere on SO or even Google - I have an oauth-signed call to the Flickr upload API, and following the docs I've signed the POST operation the usual oauth way (but without the photo data). For testing purposes I've only passed along a title and the photo data, which means I end up a var flickrURI that contains the following url for POSTing to:
https://api.flickr.com/services/upload/
? format=json
& oauth_consumer_key=...
& oauth_nonce=2e57b73fec6630a30588e22383cc3b25
& oauth_signature_method=HMAC-SHA1
& oauth_timestamp=1411933792346
& oauth_token=...
& title=test
& oauth_signature=O7JPn1m06vl5Rl95Z2in32YWp7Q%3D
(split over multiple lines for legibility in this question, the actual URL has no whitespacing around the ? and & for obvious reasons).
The oauth signing itself is quite correct, and code used for accessing the not-upload-API all over the place with correct behaviour, so it seems pretty much impossible for that to get the signing wrong, other than perhaps signing with "not enough data" or perhaps signing with "too much data".
The auth signing first forms the auth query string, in this case:
oauth_consumer_key=...
&oauth_nonce=60028905f65cf9d7649b3bce98f718f8
&oauth_signature_method=HMAC-SHA1
&oauth_timestamp=1411939726691
&oauth_token=...
&title=test
which is then used to form the verb + address + encoded base string:
POST&https%3A%2F%2Fapi.flickr.com%2Fservices%2Fupload%2F&oauth_consumer_key%3D...%26oauth_nonce%3D60028905f65cf9d7649b3bce98f718f8%26oauth_signature_method%3DHMAC
-SHA1%26oauth_timestamp%3D1411939726691%26oauth_token%3D...%26title%3Dtest
This is then HMAC-SHA1 digested using the Flickr and oauth secrets:
function sign = (data, key, secret) {
var hmacKey = key + "&" + (secret ? secret : ''),
hmac = crypto.createHmac("SHA1", hmacKey);
hmac.update(data);
var digest = hmac.digest("base64");
return encodeURIComponent(digest);
}
And for GET requests, this works perfectly fine. For POST requests things seem to be difference, despite the docs not explain which part is supposedly different, so I the tried to use the Nodejs request package to perform the POST action in what seemed a normal way, using:
uploadOptions = {
oauth_consumer_key = auth.api_key,
oauth_nonce = auth.oauth_nonce,
oauth_timestamp = auth.oauth_timestamp,
oauth_token = auth.access_token,
oauth_signature_method = "HMAC-SHA1",
title: title,
photo: <binary data buffer>
};
flickrURL = formSignedURL(auth);
request.post({
url: flickrURI,
headers: {
"Authorization": 'oauth_consumer_key="...",oauth_token="...",oauth_signature_method="HMAC-SHA1",oauth_signature="...",oauth_timestamp="...",oauth_nonce="...",oauth_version="1.0"'
},
multipart: [{
'content-type': 'application/json',
body: JSON.stringify(signOptions)
}]
},function(error, response, body) {
console.log("error");
console.log(error);
console.log("body");
console.log(body);
}
);
which yields a body that contains:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rsp stat="fail">
<err code="100" msg="Invalid API Key (Key has invalid format)" />
</rsp>
As the oauth signing doesn't really give me a choice in which API key to provide (there is only one) and the signing works just fine for the not-upload API, I can't figure out what this error message is trying to tell me. The key is definitely the right format because that's the format Flickr gives you, and it's the correct value, because it works just fine outside of uploading. I also made sure to get the oauth token and secret for that key with "delete" permission (widest possible permissions) so the included access token and access token secret should pass the "does this token for this key have permissions to write" test.
What obvious thing am I missing here that's preventing the upload to go through?

It looks like you're using the https://up.flickr.com/services/upload/ endpoint, which uses the old authentication scheme.
For OAuth, it should be https://api.flickr.com/services/upload/. Make sure the endpoint is included in signing process.
I don't think it's documented anywhere, but I remember having same issue a while back.

It turns out adding the data as request.post multipart information isn't good enough, and will make the Flickr API throw an "Invalid API Key (Key has invalid format)" error instead of saying what's actually wrong. The following request call, with exactly the same data, works:
var uploadOptions = ...
var flickrURL = ...;
var req = request.post(flickrURL, function(error, response, body) {
callback(error, body);
});
var form = req.form();
uploadOptions.photo = fs.createReadStream(...);
Object.keys(photoOptions).forEach(function(prop) {
form.append(prop, photoOptions[prop]);
});
Despite not making all that much sense call wise (why would the POST not already be done by the time we call form = req.form()?) this is request's "proper" way to send the POST payload over the wire, and makes the Flickr API process the photo upload just fine.

Can an access token returned by Facebook to the Javascript SDK work server-side with the PHP SDK?

I'm building a website that makes use of Facebook connect. I'm authenticating users client-side with the javascript SDK and calling an AJAX method on my server every time a user logs in to check if the user is known to my app, and if the user is new to store their FBID in my database to register them as a new user.
My question is: Can the access token returned by Facebook to the Javascript SDK be used server-side (with the PHP SDK for example)? Can I send the access token string to the server via an AJAX call, store it in my database (along with a timestamp so I know how long it's valid for) and then use it to make calls to the graph API server-side? Is this even a logical thing to do?

Yes, this should work. Look at this question: How to properly handle session and access token with Facebook PHP SDK 3.0?
This is a workaround for the old JS and new PHP SDK. In my app I send the access token generated by the JS SDK via a form to my PHP. I have no doubts that this also works by sending the access token via ajax!

Using Jquery:
//Set an error message
var oops = ("Put your something went wrong message here.");
//Function to post the data to the server
function save(uid, accessToken){
$.post("../foo/bar", { uid: uid, access_token: accessToken, etc, etc }, function(data){
alert("Successfully connected to Facebook.");
location.reload();
}, "text");
}
function handler(x){
if (x.authResponse){
var token = x.authResponse.accessToken;
var uid = x.authResponse.id;
FB.api("/me/accounts", {access_token: token},
function(response){
if(response.data.length == 0) {
//Regular facebook user with one account (profile)
save(uid, token);
}else{
//Handle multiple accounts (if you want access to pages, groups, etc)
}
});
}else{
alert(oops);
}
}
FB.login(handler, {scope: 'The list of permissions you are requesting goes here'});
Any improvement suggestions are always appreciated.