Logical operator with different types - javascript

I'm trying to solve the famous FizzBuzz quiz but I decided to use the logical operator or instead of else to provide fullback.
for (var num = 1; num <= 100; num++) {
var output;
if (num % 5 === 0 && num % 3 === 0) {
output = "FizzBuzz";
} else if (num % 5 === 0) {
output = "Buzz";
} else if (num % 3 === 0) {
output = "Fizz";
}
console.log(output || num);
}
This was supposed to print all the numbers from 1 to 100, with some exceptions. For numbers divisible by 3, print "Fizz" instead of the number, and for numbers divisible by 5, print "Buzz" instead and "FizzBuzz", for numbers that are divisible by both 3 and 5.
But it doesn't print any numbers.


The output declaration could be num like :
var output = num;
So you don"t have to use the || operator and just print the output directly :
console.log(output);
for (var num = 1; num <= 100; num++) {
var output = num;
if (num % 5 === 0 && num % 3 === 0) {
output = "FizzBuzz";
} else if (num % 5 === 0) {
output = "Buzz";
} else if (num % 3 === 0) {
output = "Fizz";
}
console.log(output);
}


I will say that Zakaria's answer is correct, but for exposure's sake, here is my answer
for (var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
var output = "";
if (!(i % 3)) output += "Fizz";
if (!(i % 5)) output += "Buzz";
console.log(output || i);
}
My logic here:
set the output value to be equal to "", which evaluates to a falsey value.
If a number is divisible by 3, then i % 3 will be 0, this is also a falsey value so we flip it by using the ! operator. Assume that i=9, then ! (i%3) = !(9%3) = !(0) = !(false) = true.
Therefore, if !(i%3) becomes true we append our empty string with "Fizz", then we use the same sort of logic for i%5, but instead appending "Buzz"
Note the order of these two if statements is important -- flip them around and you'll get BuzzFizz instead of FizzBuzz.
If output is not the empty string we set it to originally, output || i will return the value of output, giving us "Fizz", "Buzz", or "FizzBuzz" depending.
If ouput is empty, then output || i will return the value for i


Use let to fix the output's scope:
for (var num = 1; num <= 100; num++) {
let output;
if (num % 5 === 0 && num % 3 === 0) {
output = "FizzBuzz";
} else if (num % 5 === 0) {
output = "Buzz";
} else if (num % 3 === 0) {
output = "Fizz";
}
console.log(output || num);
}
Also, the || could be removed if you initialize output with num:
for (var num = 1; num <= 100; num++) {
let output = num;
if (num % 5 === 0 && num % 3 === 0) {
output = "FizzBuzz";
} else if (num % 5 === 0) {
output = "Buzz";
} else if (num % 3 === 0) {
output = "Fizz";
}
console.log(output);
}

Related

While loop output not correct

I'm busy with a udacity excercise and the following question:
A while loop that:
Loop through the numbers 1 to 20
If the number is divisible by 3, print "Julia"
If the number is divisible by 5, print "James"
If the number is divisible by 3 and 5, print "JuliaJames"
If the number is not divisible by 3 or 5, print the number
I keep submitting the answer but it tells me that my while loop condition is incorrect, Is there anything im doing wrong?
var x = 1;
while (x <= 20) {
if (x/3 === 0) {
console.log("julia" );
} // check divisibility
else if (x/5 === 0) {
console.log("james");
}
else if (x/5 === 0 && x/3 === 0 ) {
console.log("juiliajames");
} // print Julia, James, or JuliaJames
else {
console.log(x);
}
x= x + 1;// increment x
}

You need to use Modulus (%) instead of divide (/). And make x % 5 === 0 && x % 3 === 0 as your first condition.
Change your code like following.
var x = 1;
while (x <= 20) {
if (x % 5 === 0 && x % 3 === 0) {
console.log("juiliajames");
} // print Julia, James, or JuliaJames
else if (x % 3 === 0) {
console.log("julia");
} // check divisibility
else if (x % 5 === 0) {
console.log("james");
} else {
console.log(x);
}
x = x + 1; // increment x
}

var x = 1;
while (x <= 20) {
if(x%3 === 0 && x%5 === 0 ){
console.log("juiliajames" );
} // check divisibility
else if(x%3 === 0){
console.log("juilia");
}
else if (x%5 === 0){
console.log("james");
} // print Julia, James, or JuliaJames
else{
console.log(x);
}
x= x + 1;// increment x
}
If you want to check divisibility, you should use the % operator instead of / operator.

Check x divisible by 5 AND 3 at the begining or it will never been done because if it is divisible by 3 your loop won't go to the else if statment.
To check divisibility use modulo (x/3 === 0 only for x = 0)
var x = 1;
while (x <= 20) {
if(x%5 === 0 && x%3 === 0){
console.log("juiliajames" );
}
else if(x%5 === 0){
console.log("james");
}
else if (x%3 === 0 ){
console.log("juilia");
}
else{
console.log(x);
}
x= x + 1;// increment x
}

My approach works by setting bitwise flags on an integer. If it's divisible by three (value % 3 === 0, where % is 'modulo' which gives an integer remainder from division) The first bit is set and if it's divisible by five the second bit is set. That gives a result that could have three binary values 01, 10 or 11, or in decimal 1, 2 & 3 (The three comes about when both bits are set).
var DIVISABLE_BY_THREE = 1;
var DIVISABLE_BY_FIVE = 2;
var DIVISABLE_BY_THREE_AND_FIVE = 3;
var value = 0;
while(value++ < 20) {
var modulo_3 = (value % 3 === 0) | 0;
var modulo_5 = ((value % 5 === 0) | 0) << 1;
switch(modulo_3 | modulo_5) {
case DIVISABLE_BY_THREE:
console.log("Julia");
break;
case DIVISABLE_BY_FIVE:
console.log("James");
break;
case DIVISABLE_BY_THREE_AND_FIVE:
console.log("JuliaJames");
break;
default:
console.log(value);
break;
}
}

var x = 1;
while (x <= 20) {
var name ="";
if (x % 3 == 0) {
name = name + "julia";
}
if (x % 5 == 0) {
name = name + "james";
}
if(name.length > 0)
console.log(name);
else
console.log(x);
x++;
}

Exercise on javascript

please I'm stuck in this question below since yesterday. Below is the question:
Write a program that uses console.log to print all the numbers from 1
to 100, with two exceptions. For numbers divisible by 3, print "Fizz"
instead of the number, and for numbers divisible by 5 (and not 3), print
"Buzz" instead.
When you have that working, modify your program to print "FizzBuzz",
for numbers that are divisible by both 3 and 5 (and still print "Fizz" or
"Buzz" for numbers divisible by only one of those).
I only got the first two conditions but not the the third. I don't know how to go about it anymore, I've tried many options. Below is my code:
<html>
<head/head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
for (i = 1; i <= 100; i++)
if (i % 3 == 0) {
document.write("Fizz");
document.write("<br />");
} else if (i % 5 == 0 && i % 3 != 0) {
document.write("Buzz");
document.write("<br />");
} else if (i % 3 && 5 == 0 && i % 3 != 0 && i % 5 != 0) {
document.write("FizzBuzz");
document.write("<br />");
} else {
document.write(+i);
document.write("<br />");
}
</script>
</body>
</html>

Check the most specific (FizzBuzz) condition first.
function fizzBuzz() {
for(var i = 1; i <= 100; i++){
if(i % 5 === 0 && i % 3 === 0){
console.log('FizzBuzz');
} else if(i % 3 === 0){
console.log('Fizz');
} else if(i % 5 === 0){
console.log('Buzz');
} else {
console.log(i);
}
}
}

here is an updated version of your code, I keep it as you write it with some changes, I made it work without touch it's logic, you can see that the problem was in the first comparison and in the second "if else" (5 will never be equal to 0). you can optimize the code more than that, good luck.
<html>
<head/head>
<body>
<script type="text/javascript">
for (i = 1; i <= 100; i++)
if (i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 != 0) {
document.write("Fizz");
document.write("<br />");
} else if (i % 5 == 0 && i % 3 != 0) {
document.write("Buzz");
document.write("<br />");
} else if (i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 == 0) {
document.write("FizzBuzz");
document.write("<br />");
} else {
document.write(+i);
document.write("<br />");
}
</script>
</body>
</html>

Since everyone is contributing, I might as well give you an interesting solution:
var i = 101;
while(i --> 0){ // as i goes to 0... wat
var state = !!(i % 3) << 1 | !!(i % 5), // compute state?
output = ["FizzBuzz", "Fizz", "Buzz", i]; // hmm...
console.log(output[state]); // output correct string
}

1st - Instead of document.write use console.log like the question says
2nd - You have a syntax error in the head section. it should be <head></head>
3rd - for the 1st part of the question all you need is this:
for (i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
// if i is divisible by 3
if (i % 3 == 0) {
console.log("Fizz");
}
// if i is divisible by 5 (no need to check for 3 again)
else if (i % 5 == 0) {
console.log("Buzz");
}
// else
else {
console.log(i);
}
}
4th - For the 2nd part you need to add an extra if on top of what you have already:
for (i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
// if i is divisible by 3 and 5
if (i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 == 0) {
console.log("FizzBuzz");
}
// if i is divisible by 3
else if (i % 3 == 0) {
console.log("Fizz");
}
// if i is divisible by 5 (no need to check for 3 again)
else if (i % 5 == 0) {
console.log("Buzz");
}
// else
else {
console.log(i);
}
}
working fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/tedmanowar/amapqcLL/

You can use a while loop, than use a nested if statements to check the conditions.
let number = 0;
while (number <= 100) {
if(number % 3 === 0 && number % 5 === 0){
console.log("FizzBuzz");
}else if(number % 3 === 0){
console.log("Fizz");
}else if(number % 5 === 0){
console.log("Buzz");
}else{
console.log(number);
}
number++;
}

This solution is the easiest and simplest. There are multiple ways to solve the question though.
for (n=1; n<=100; n++){
let output = "";
if(n % 3=== 0) output += "Fizz"
if(n % 5=== 0) output += "buzz"
console.log(output || n);
}

I don't recommend this answer - since it is very hard to maintain - but it does do it in very few lines. It also relies on the two numbers only having a common factor of 1.
for(let i=1; i<=100; i++) {
console.log(`${i%15?i%5?i%3?i:'Fizz':'Buzz':'FizzBuzz'}`)
}
This is using the ternary operator and backquote template strings.

You should just use a loop that starts at 1 and is less than 101 (so up to 100) and test for the %n === 0. In other words, make sure there is no remainder.
function startConsoleDemo(){
for(var i=1,r; i<101; i++){ // loop from 1 to 100
r = i; // default value of r
if(i % 3 === 0 && i % 5 === 0){ // if i/3 and 1/5 do not produce a remainder
r = 'FizzBuzz'; // reassign r
}
else if(i % 3 === 0){ // we knew i % 5 !== 0 so see if i/3 does not produce a remainder
r = 'Fizz'; // reassign r
}
else if(i % 5 === 0){ // we already knew i % 3 !== 0 - you know the drill
r = 'Buzz'; // reassign r
}
console.log(r); // console at each step of the loop no matter what
}
}
startConsoleDemo(); // without () you can use like a var then () later

I have a solution and I'm pretty sure it'll work for you.
for (let i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
if (i % 3 === 0 && i % 5 === 0) {
document.write(`${i} FizzBuzz`);
} else if (i % 3 === 0 && i % 5 !== 0) {
document.write(`${i} Fizz`);
} else if (i % 5 === 0 && i % 3 !== 0) {
document.write(`${i} Buzz`);
} else {
document.write(`${i}`);
}
}

similar to FizzBuzz with a twist

Write a javascript program that displays the numbers from 10 to 100. But for multiples of 4 print "Penny" instead of the number and for multiples of 6 print "Leonard". For numbers which are multiples of both 4 and 6 print "Bazzinga"
I know how to do two parts struggling to print 6 and 4;
function baZzinga (number) {
for (var number = 10; number <= 101; number++)
if(number % 4 == 0) {
console.log("penny");
}
else if (number % 6 == 0) {
console.log("Leonard");
} else if ( not sure what goes here) {
help help help
} else {
console.log(number");
}

You want the and condition first. Try this
var result = document.getElementById("result");
function baZzinga (number) {
for (var number = 10; number <= 101; number++) {
if (number % 4 == 0 && number % 6 == 0) {
result.innerHTML += "Bazinga";
}
else if(number % 4 == 0) {
result.innerHTML += "penny";
}
else if (number % 6 == 0) {
result.innerHTML += "Leonard";
}
else {
result.innerHTML += number;
}
}
}
baZzinga()
<p id="result"></p>
I changed console.log to result.innerHTML because I wanted to demonstrate it in a snippet.

I have a few comments on your code -- constructive criticism, I hope! First, you don't need the number parameter in your bazzinga function. Next, the indentation of the code you posted makes it hard to read. Finally, you should almost always use === instead of ==. The === tests for strict equality, whereas == tries to do some type conversions first (and can therefore produce unexpected results). See the official docs.
To answer you question: check for divisibility by 6 AND 8 first. That way, it will override the individual cases. I believe you want something like this:
function bazzinga() {
for (var number = 10; number <= 100; number++) {
if (number % 4 === 0 && number % 6 === 0) {
console.log("Bazzinga");
} else if (number % 4 === 0) {
console.log("Penny");
} else if (number % 6 === 0) {
console.log("Leonard");
}
}
}

Here is a solution using the format you posted:
for (var number = 10; number <= 100; number++) {
if(number % 4 === 0 && number % 6 === 0){
console.log("bazzinga");
} else if(number % 4 === 0) {
console.log("penny");
} else if (number % 6 === 0) {
console.log("Leonard");
} else {
console.log(number);
}
}
Or use the ternary operator to be even more succinct!
for (var i = 10; i <= 100; i++){
var penny = i % 4 === 0;
var leonard = i % 6 === 0;
console.log(penny ? (leonard ? "bazzinga" : "penny"): leonard ? "leonard" : i);
}

function process_num(num) {
return num % 4 == 0 ? num % 6 == 0 ? "Bazzinga" : "Penny" : num % 6 == 0 ? "Leonard" : num;
}
for (x = 10; x <= 100; x++) { console.log( x + ': is ', process_num(x)) }
Nested Ternary operator for conciseness
If it passes outer ternary test it is divisible by 4:
Enter into nested termary one to test if num is also divisible by 6 for the BaZzinga prize!!
If it fails the BaZzinga challenge, we know it previously passed the divisible by 4 test so print "penny"
Failing the outer ternary condition, we know it's not divisible by 4:
Enter nested ternary two to consider if divisible by 6. If so print "Leonard".
If not it's failed both the outer (div by 4) and inner (div by 6) so return the number unchanged.
Now that the logic is contained in the function, we can just create a for loop to iterate over the required numbers printing out the correct values.

How do I find the value divisible by 4 AND 5?

I need to print "foo bar" if the value of a number between 1 and 100 is divisible by 4 and 5.
edit: both 4 and 5
Here is what I have so far:
for(i = 1; i < 100; i++){
if(i % 4 === 0){
console.log("foo");
}
else if(i % 5 === 0){
console.log("bar");
}
}

Try this:
for(i=1; i<100; i++){
if(i % 4 === 0 && i % 5 === 0) {
console.log("foobar");
}
else if(i % 4 === 0) {
console.log("foo");
}
else if(i % 5 === 0) {
console.log("bar");
}
}

Its simple maths, you can try to check it like this:
for(i=1; i<100; i++){
if(i % 20 === 0){
console.log("foo");
}
}

You can combine these statements into one if:
if(i % 4 === 0 && i % 5 === 0)
{
console.log("This number is both divisible by 4 and 5");
}
You can learn more about if and comparison operands here.

What you have is printing foo for all numbers divisible by 4 and bar for all numbers divisible by 5. Then, your code excludes 100 from the values.
The right solution to your problem is:
for(i=1; i<=100; i++){
if(i % 4 === 0 && i % 5 === 0){
console.log("foo bar");
}
}

You are actually correct. If you want to know that value is divisble by 4 and 5 you need make modulo condition on both and check whether modulo is equal to 0
so proper condition is
for ( i = 1; i < 100; i++) {
if (i % 4 == 0 && i % 5 == 0) {
console.log("number is divisble by 4 and 5");
}
}

Just try this:
for(var i = 1; i < 100; i++){
var result;
if(i % 4 === 0){
result = "foo";
}
//... perhaps, there are any conditions
if(i % 5 === 0 && result){
result += "bar";
console.log(result);
}
}
Second way:
for(var i = 1; i < 100; i++){
var result;
if(i % 4 === 0){
result = "foo";
}
//... perhaps, there are any conditions
if(i % 5 === 0 && result){
result += "bar";
} else result = "";//or undefined
if(result) console.log(result);
}

FizzBuzz program (details given) in Javascript [closed]

Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Can someone please correct this code of mine for FizzBuzz? There seems to be a small mistake. This code below prints all the numbers instead of printing only numbers that are not divisible by 3 or 5.
Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100. But for multiples of three, print "Fizz" instead of the number, and for the multiples of five, print "Buzz". For numbers which are multiples of both three and five, print "FizzBuzz".
function isDivisible(numa, num) {
if (numa % num == 0) {
return true;
} else {
return false;
}
};
function by3(num) {
if (isDivisible(num, 3)) {
console.log("Fizz");
} else {
return false;
}
};
function by5(num) {
if (isDivisible(num, 5)) {
console.log("Buzz");
} else {
return false;
}
};
for (var a=1; a<=100; a++) {
if (by3(a)) {
by3(a);
if (by5(a)) {
by5(a);
console.log("\n");
} else {
console.log("\n");
}
} else if (by5(a)) {
by5(a);
console.log("\n");
} else {
console.log(a+"\n")
}
}

for (let i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
let out = '';
if (i % 3 === 0) out += 'Fizz';
if (i % 5 === 0) out += 'Buzz';
console.log(out || i);
}

/*Write a program that prints the numbers from 1 to 100. But for multiples of three print “Fizz” instead of the number and for the multiples of five print “Buzz”. For numbers which are multiples of both three and five print “FizzBuzz”*/
var str="",x,y,a;
for (a=1;a<=100;a++)
{
x = a%3 ==0;
y = a%5 ==0;
if(x)
{
str+="fizz"
}
if (y)
{
str+="buzz"
}
if (!(x||y))
{
str+=a;
}
str+="\n"
}
console.log(str);
Your functions return falsy values no matter what, but will print anyway. No need to make this overly complicated.
fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/ben336/7c9KN/

Was fooling around with FizzBuzz and JavaScript as comparison to C#.
Here's my version, heavily influenced by more rigid languages:
function FizzBuzz(aTarget) {
for (var i = 1; i <= aTarget; i++) {
var result = "";
if (i%3 === 0) result += "Fizz";
if (i%5 === 0) result += "Buzz";
if (result.length ===0) result = i;
console.log(result);
}
}
I like the structure and ease of read.
Now, what Trevor Dixon cleverly did is relay on the false-y values of the language (false , null , undefined , '' (the empty string) , 0 and NaN (Not a Number)) to shorten the code.
Now, the if (result.length ===0) result = i; line is redundant and the code will look like:
function FizzBuzz(aTarget) {
for (var i = 1; i <= aTarget; i++) {
var result = "";
if (i%3 === 0) result += "Fizz";
if (i%5 === 0) result += "Buzz";
console.log(result || i);
}
}
Here we relay on the || operator to say : "if result is false, print the iteration value (i)". Cool trick, and I guess I need to play more with JavaScript in order to assimilate this logic.
You can see other examples (from GitHub) that will range from things like :
for (var i=1; i <= 20; i++)
{
if (i % 15 == 0)
console.log("FizzBuzz");
else if (i % 3 == 0)
console.log("Fizz");
else if (i % 5 == 0)
console.log("Buzz");
else
console.log(i);
}
No variables here, and just check for division by 15,3 & 5 (my above one only divides by 3 & 5, but has an extra variable, so I guess it's down to microbenchmarking for those who care, or style preferences).
To:
for(i=0;i<100;)console.log((++i%3?'':'Fizz')+(i%5?'':'Buzz')||i)
Which does it all in on line, relaying on the fact that 0 is a false value, so you can use that for the if-else shorthanded version (? :), in addition to the || trick we've seen before.
Here's a more readable version of the above, with some variables:
for (var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
var f = i % 3 == 0, b = i % 5 == 0;
console.log(f ? b ? "FizzBuzz" : "Fizz" : b ? "Buzz" : i);
}
All in all, you can do it in different ways, and I hope you picked up some nifty tips for use in JavaScript :)

.fizz and .buzz could be CSS classes, no? In which case:
var n = 0;
var b = document.querySelector("output");
window.setInterval(function () {
n++;
b.classList[n%3 ? "remove" : "add"]("fizz");
b.classList[n%5 ? "remove" : "add"]("buzz");
b.textContent = n;
}, 500);
output.fizz:after {
content: " fizz";
color:red;
}
output.buzz:after {
content: " buzz";
color:blue;
}
output.fizz.buzz:after {
content: " fizzbuzz";
color:magenta;
}
<output>0</output>

With ternary operator it is much simple:
for (var i = 0; i <= 100; i++) {
str = (i % 5 == 0 && i % 3 == 0) ? "FizzBuzz" : (i % 3 == 0 ? "Fizz" : (i % 5 == 0) ? "Buzz" : i);
console.log(str);
}

for(i = 1; i < 101; i++) {
if(i % 3 === 0) {
if(i % 5 === 0) {
console.log("FizzBuzz");
}
else {
console.log("Fizz");
}
}
else if(i % 5 === 0) {
console.log("Buzz");
}
else {
console.log(i)
}
}

In your by3 and by5 functions, you implicitly return undefined if it is applicable and false if it's not applicable, but your if statement is testing as if it returned true or false. Return true explicitly if it is applicable so your if statement picks it up.

As an ES6 generator: http://www.es6fiddle.net/i9lhnt2v/
function* FizzBuzz() {
let index = 0;
while (true) {
let value = ''; index++;
if (index % 3 === 0) value += 'Fizz';
if (index % 5 === 0) value += 'Buzz';
yield value || index;
}
}
let fb = FizzBuzz();
for (let index = 0; index < 100; index++) {
console.log(fb.next().value);
}

Codeacademy sprang a FizzBuzz on me tonight. I had a vague memory that it was "a thing" so I did this. Not the best way, perhaps, but different from the above:
var data = {
Fizz:3,
Buzz:5
};
for (var i=1;i<=100;i++) {
var value = '';
for (var k in data) {
value += i%data[k]?'':k;
}
console.log(value?value:i);
}
It relies on data rather than code. I think that if there is an advantage to this approach, it is that you can go FizzBuzzBing 3 5 7 or further without adding additional logic, provided that you assign the object elements in the order your rules specify. For example:
var data = {
Fizz:3,
Buzz:5,
Bing:7,
Boom:11,
Zing:13
};
for (var i=1;i<=1000;i++) {
var value = '';
for (var k in data) {
value += i%data[k]?'':k;
}
console.log(value?value:i);
}

This is what I wrote:
for (var num = 1; num<101; num = num + 1) {
if (num % 5 == 0 && num % 3 == 0) {
console.log("FizzBuzz");
}
else if (num % 5 == 0) {
console.log("Buzz");
}
else if (num % 3 == 0) {
console.log("Fizz");
}
else {
console.log(num);
}
}

for (var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
if (i % 3 === 0 && i % 5 === 0) console.log("FizzBuzz");
else if (i%3 === 0) console.log("Fizz");
else if (i%5 === 0) console.log("Buzz");
else console.log(i);
}
One of the easiest way to FizzBuzz.
Multiple of 3 and 5, at the same time, means multiple of 15.
Second version:
for (var i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
if (i % 15 === 0) console.log("FizzBuzz");
else if (i%3 === 0) console.log("Fizz");
else if (i%5 === 0) console.log("Buzz");
else console.log(i);
}

In case someone is looking for other solutions: This one is a pure, recursive, and reusable function with optionally customizable parameter values:
const fizzBuzz = (from = 1, till = 100, ruleMap = {
3: "Fizz",
5: "Buzz",
}) => from > till || console.log(
Object.keys(ruleMap)
.filter(number => from % number === 0)
.map(number => ruleMap[number]).join("") || from
) || fizzBuzz(from + 1, till, ruleMap);
// Usage:
fizzBuzz(/*Default values*/);
The from > till is the anchor to break the recursion. Since it returns false until from is higher than till, it goes to the next statement (console.log):
Object.keys returns an array of object properties in the given ruleMap which are 3 and 5 by default in our case.
Then, it iterates through the numbers and returns only those which are divisible by the from (0 as rest).
Then, it iterates through the filtered numbers and outputs the saying according to the rule.
If, however, the filter method returned an empty array ([], no results found), it outputs just the current from value because the join method at the end finally returns just an empty string ("") which is a falsy value.
Since console.log always returns undefined, it goes to the next statement and calls itself again incrementing the from value by 1.

A Functional version of FizzBuzz
const dot = (a,b) => x => a(b(x));
const id = x => x;
function fizzbuzz(n){
const f = (N, m) => n % N ? id : x => _ => m + x('');
return dot(f(3, 'fizz'), f(5, 'buzz')) (id) (n);
}
for more options in the above replace dot with dots as below
const dots = (...a) => f0 => a.reduceRight((acc, f) => f(acc), f0);
function fizzbuzz(n){
const f = (N, m) => n % N ? id : x => _ => m + x('');
return dots(f(3, 'fizz'), f(5, 'buzz'), f(7, 'bam')) (id) (n);
}
Reference: FizzBuzz in Haskell by Embedding a Domain-Specific Language
by Maciej Piro ́g

for (i=1; i<=100; i++) {
output = "";
if (i%5==0) output = "buzz";
if (i%3==0) output = "fizz" + output;
if (output=="") output = i;
console.log(output);
}

Functional style! JSBin Demo
// create a iterable array with a length of 100
// and map every value to a random number from 1 to a 100
var series = Array.apply(null, Array(100)).map(function() {
return Math.round(Math.random() * 100) + 1;
});
// define the fizzbuzz function which takes an interger as input
// it evaluates the case expressions similar to Haskell's guards
var fizzbuzz = function (item) {
switch (true) {
case item % 15 === 0:
console.log('fizzbuzz');
break;
case item % 3 === 0:
console.log('fizz');
break;
case item % 5 === 0:
console.log('buzz');
break;
default:
console.log(item);
break;
}
};
// map the series values to the fizzbuzz function
series.map(fizzbuzz);

Another solution, avoiding excess divisions and eliminating excess spaces between "Fizz" and "Buzz":
var num = 1;
var FIZZ = 3; // why not make this easily modded?
var BUZZ = 5; // ditto
var UPTO = 100; // ditto
// and easily extended to other effervescent sounds
while (num < UPTO)
{
var flag = false;
if (num % FIZZ == 0) { document.write ("Fizz"); flag = true; }
if (num % BUZZ == 0) { document.write ("Buzz"); flag = true; }
if (flag == false) { document.write (num); }
document.write ("<br>");
num += 1;
}
If you're using using jscript/jsc/.net, use Console.Write(). If you're using using Node.js, use process.stdout.write(). Unfortunately, console.log() appends newlines and ignores backspaces, so it's unusable for this purpose. You could also probably append to a string and print it. (I'm a complete n00b, but I think (ok, hope) I've been reasonably thorough.)
"Whaddya think, sirs?"

check this out!
function fizzBuzz(){
for(var i=1; i<=100; i++){
if(i % 3 ===0 && i % 5===0){
console.log(i+' fizzBuzz');
} else if(i % 3 ===0){
console.log(i+' fizz');
} else if(i % 5 ===0){
console.log(i+' buzz');
} else {
console.log(i);
}
}
}fizzBuzz();

Slightly different implementation.
You can put your own argument into the function. Can be non-sequential numbers like [0, 3, 10, 1, 4]. The default set is only from 1-15.
function fizzbuzz (set) {
var set = set ? set : [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]
var isValidSet = set.map((element) => {if (typeof element !== 'number') {return false} else return true}).indexOf(false) === -1 ? true : false
var gotFizz = (n) => {if (n % 3 === 0) {return true} else return false}
var gotBuzz = (n) => {if (n % 5 === 0) {return true} else return false}
if (!Array.isArray(set)) return new Error('First argument must an array with "Number" elements')
if (!isValidSet) return new Error('The elements of the first argument must all be "Numbers"')
set.forEach((n) => {
if (gotFizz(n) && gotBuzz(n)) return console.log('fizzbuzz')
if (gotFizz(n)) return console.log('fizz')
if (gotBuzz(n)) return console.log('buzz')
else return console.log(n)
})
}

var num = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20];
var runLoop = function() {
for (var i = 1; i<=num.length; i++) {
if (i % 5 === 0 && i % 3 === 0) {
console.log("FizzBuzz");
}
else if (i % 5 === 0) {
console.log("Buzz");
}
else if (i % 3 === 0) {
console.log("Fizz");
}
else {
console.log(i);
}
}
};
runLoop();

Just want to share my way to solve this
for (i = 1; i <= 100; i++){
if (i % 3 === 0 && i % 5 === 0) {
console.log('fizzBuzz');
} else if (i % 3 === 0) {
console.log('fizz');
} else if (i % 5 === 0){
console.log('buzz');
} else {
console.log(i);
}
}

var limit = prompt("Enter the number limit");
var n = parseInt(limit);
var series = 0;
for(i=1;i<n;i++){
series = series+" " +check();
}
function check() {
var result;
if (i%3==0 && i%5==0) { // check whether the number is divisible by both 3 and 5
result = "fizzbuzz "; // if so, return fizzbuzz
return result;
}
else if (i%3==0) { // check whether the number is divisible by 3
result = "fizz "; // if so, return fizz
return result;
}
else if (i%5==0) { // check whether the number is divisible by 5
result = "buzz "; // if so, return buzz
return result;
}
else return i; // if all the above conditions fail, then return the number as it is
}
alert(series);

Thats How i did it :
Not the best code but that did the trick
var numbers = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20];
for(var i = 0 ; i <= 19 ; i++){
var fizz = numbers[i] % 3 === 0;
var buzz = numbers[i] % 5 === 0;
var fizzBuzz = numbers[i] % 5 === 0 && numbers[i] % 3 === 0;
if(fizzBuzz){
console.log("FizzBuzz");
} else if(fizz){
console.log("Fizz");
} else if(buzz){
console.log("Buzz");
} else {
console.log(numbers[i]);
}
}

As much as this is easy logic it can be a daunting task for beginners. Below is my solution to the FizzBuzz problem:
let i = 1;
while(i<=100){
if(i % 3 ==0 && i % 5 == 0){
console.log('FizzBuzz');
}
else if(i % 3 == 0){
console.log('Fizz');
}
else if(i % 5 == 0){
console.log('Buzz');
}
else{
console.log(i);
}
i++;
}

considering performance and readability, please find my take on this problem
way 1: instead of doing a math modules operation in an if loop, which results in performing 3 times taking it a step above reduces the overhead
function fizzBuzz(n) {
let count =0;
let x = 0;
let y = 0;
while(n!==count)
{
count++;
x = count%3;
y = count%5;
if(x === 0 && y ===0)
{
console.log("fizzbuzz");
}
else if(x === 0)
{
console.log("fizz");
}
else if(y === 0)
{
console.log("buzz");
}
else
{
console.log(count);
}
}
}
fizzBuzz(15);
way 2: condensing the solution
function fizzBuzz(n) {
let x = 0;
let y = 0;
for (var i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
var result = "";
x = i%3;
y = i%5;
if (x === 0 && y === 0) result += "fizzbuzz";
else if (x === 0) result += "fizz";
else if (y === 0) result += "buzz";
console.log(result || i);
}
}
fizzBuzz(5)

Here's my favorite solution. Succinct, functional & fast.
const oneToOneHundred = Array.from({ length: 100 }, (_, i) => i + 1);
const fizzBuzz = (n) => {
if (n % 15 === 0) return 'FizzBuzz';
if (n % 3 === 0) return 'Fizz';
if (n % 5 === 0) return 'Buzz';
return n;
};
console.log(oneToOneHundred.map((i) => fizzBuzz(i)).join('\n'));

function fizzBuzz(n) {
for (let i = 1; i < n + 1; i++) {
if (i % 15 == 0) {
console.log("fizzbuzz");
} else if (i % 3 == 0) {
console.log("fizz");
} else if (i % 5 == 0) {
console.log("buzz");
} else {
console.log(i);
}
}
}
fizzBuzz(15);

Different functional style -- naive
fbRule = function(x,y,f,b,z){return function(z){return (z % (x*y) == 0 ? f+b: (z % x == 0 ? f : (z % y == 0 ? b: z))) }}
range = function(n){return Array.apply(null, Array(n)).map(function (_, i) {return i+1;});}
range(100).map(fbRule(3,5, "fizz", "buzz"))
or, to incorporate structures as in above example: ie [[3, "fizz"],[5, "buzz"], ...]
fbRule = function(fbArr,z){
return function(z){
var ed = fbArr.reduce(function(sum, unit){return z%unit[0] === 0 ? sum.concat(unit[1]) : sum }, [] )
return ed.length>0 ? ed.join("") : z
}
}
range = function(n){return Array.apply(null, Array(n)).map(function (_, i) {return i+1;});}
range(100).map(fbRule([[3, "fizz"],[5, "buzz"]]))
OR, use ramda [from https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/108449/fizzbuzz-in-javascript-using-ramda ]
var divisibleBy = R.curry(R.compose(R.equals(0), R.flip(R.modulo)))
var fizzbuzz = R.map(R.cond([
[R.both(divisibleBy(3), divisibleBy(5)), R.always('FizzBuzz')],
[divisibleBy(3), R.aklways('Fizz')],
[divisibleBy(5), R.always('Buzz')],
[R.T, R.identity]
]));
console.log(fizzbuzz(R.range(1,101)))

Categories