We Keep Coding

Router.push is returning my objects as undefined, the array length is correct but the value is "" in Next.js [duplicate]

I got a problem with my dynamic route. It look like this
[lang]/abc
I am trying to get query value from [lang] but when I using useRouter/withRouter i got query during 2-3 render of page ( on first i got query.lang = undefined ). its possible to get in 1 render or use any technique ?

I found something:
isReady: boolean - Whether the router fields are updated client-side and ready for use. Should only be used inside of useEffect methods and not for conditionally rendering on the server.
https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/router#router-object
And the code would be like:
const router = useRouter();
useEffect(()=>{
if(!router.isReady) return;
// codes using router.query
}, [router.isReady]);

It's impossible to get the query value during the initial render.
Statically optimized pages are hydrated without the route parameters, so the query is an empty object ({}).
Next.js will populate the query after the page has been hydrated.
Next.js 10.0.5 and up
To determine if the route params are ready, you can use router.isReady inside a useEffect hook. For an example, see the answer provided by #doxylee.
Before Next.js 10.0.5
At first render of a dynamic route router.asPath and router.route are equal. Once query object is available, router.asPath reflects it.
You can rely on the query value within a useEffect hook after asPath has been changed.
const router = useRouter();
useEffect(() => {
if (router.asPath !== router.route) {
// router.query.lang is defined
}
}, [router])
GitHub Issue - Add a "ready" to Router returned by "useRouter"

In NextJS 9+, one way to ensure route parameters are immediately available for page components is to get them from the context arg passed to getServerSideProps() and pass to the component as props.
For a page like [id].js,
export function getServerSideProps(context) {
return {
props: {params: context.params}
};
}
export default ({params}) => {
const {id} = params;
return <div>You opened page with {id}</div>;
};

This is a great question and one that took a few days for me to figure out what the best approach is.
I have personally found three viable solutions to the problem of validating dynamic route path params or even just route path params in general.
The three solutions are
SSR (don't recommend) [Next >= 10]
useRouter
Middleware [Next 12 required]
In my examples a will use a route that requires a reset-token or it should be redirected.
SSR
Firstly server side rending with getServerSideProps.
Vercel recommends to use SSR as a last resort and I would highly recommend not using SSR when able (time to byte & cost).
We suggest trying Incremental Static Generation or Client-side Fetching and see if they fit your needs.
https://vercel.com/blog/nextjs-server-side-rendering-vs-static-generation
But in the case that you do, say there is some server side api validation call you require to validate the query param.
export const getServerSideProps = async (context) => {
const { token } = context.query;
if (!token) {
return {
redirect: {
permanent: false,
destination: "/",
}
}
}
return {
props: {}
// props: { token }
// You could do this either with useRouter or passing props
}
}
useRouter Secondly the easiest useRouter. When I first did this I came across the problem when nextjs/react hydrates there will be a point when the query params are null. Luckily useRouter has isReady!
import Router, { useRouter } from "next/router";
const { query, isReady } = useRouter();
useEffect(() => {
if (!isReady) return;
if (!query.token) {
Router.push("/")
}
}, [isReady])
Middleware now this is my personal favourite as it seperates the functionality in a clean way imo.
I found this based of a vercel example. I would highly recommend reading through a bunch of these to find best practices.
https://github.com/vercel/examples/
import { NextResponse, NextRequest } from 'next/server'
export async function middleware(req) {
const { pathname, searchParams } = req.nextUrl
if (pathname == '/reset-token') {
const index = searchParams.findIndex(x => x.key === "token")
// You could also add token validation here.
if (!index) {
return NextResponse.redirect('/')
}
}
return NextResponse.next()
}
Here is the repo which has some cool filtering of query parameters.
This is a more soft approach instead of hard redirecting.
https://github.com/vercel/examples/tree/main/edge-functions/query-params-filter
Nico also has a great answer on this, expect I wouldn't recommend using hooks like in his example, instead use isReady.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/58182678/4918639

For Class Component Lovers
The even better approach is to listen for a dedicated event for this routeChangeComplete using this.props.router.events.on method, inside componentDidMount if you're using class component -
routeChangeComplete = () => {
// this WILL have valid query data not empty {}
console.log(this.props.router.query);
};
componentDidMount() {
this.props.router.events.on("routeChangeComplete", this.routeChangeComplete);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this.props.router.events.off("routeChangeComplete", this.routeChangeComplete);
}
Ref: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/router#routerevents
routeChangeComplete: Fires when a route changed completely.
Practically when isReady has become true or when router.query object has data.

For NextJS version - 12.0.8
"If you export a function called getServerSideProps (Server-Side Rendering) from a page, Next.js will pre-render this page on each request using the data returned by getServerSideProps."
=async functions
refference:https://nextjs.org/docs/basic-features/data-fetching/get-server-side-props#getserversideprops
Simply putting that async function on the page notifies NextJS of its presence.During prerendering stage of the component, the query object of the router will be empty.
isReady: boolean - Whether the router fields are updated client-side and ready for use. Should only be used inside of useEffect methods and not for conditionally rendering on the server.
refference: https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next/router
solution:
import { useRouter } from 'next/router';
const Fn = () =>{
const router = useRouter();
const { param } = router.query;
const fetchData = async () => {
await fetch();
}
useEffect(() => {
fetchCat();
}, [router.isReady]);
}

I resolved my problem that I need it in Hoc component.
I wrapped using withRouter(withLocale(Comp)) and create conditional in HOC
export default function withLocale(WrappedPage) {
const WithLocale = ({ router, ...props }) => {
const { lang } = router.query;
if (!lang || !isLocale(lang)) {
return <Error statusCode={404} />;
}
return (
<LocaleProvider lang={lang}>
<WrappedPage {...props} />
</LocaleProvider>
);
};
return WithLocale;
}

Next.js <= 10.0.5
This is a good work around, I found around from this comment
Add useQuery.ts helper file
// useQuery.js
import { useRouter } from 'next/router';
// Resolves query or returns null
export default function useQuery() {
const router = useRouter();
const ready = router.asPath !== router.route;
if (!ready) return null;
return router.query;
}
usage
// In your components (instead of useRouter)
const query = useQuery();
useEffect(() => {
if (!query) {
return;
}
console.log('my query exists!!', query);
}, [query]);

Class Component | 12/16/2022 | React JS 18.2.0 | Next JS 13.0.6
I got the answer for those who want to use Class Component. This was actually nowhere to be found ! Enjoy !
You will add if(this.props.router.isReady) and include return in the condition in render().
.
.
import { withRouter } from 'next/router';
import { Component } from 'react';
class User extends Component {
...
render() {
if(this.props.router.isReady){ // Add this condition and include return ()
// Do anything
console.log(this.props.router.query) // Log 'query' on first render
return (
<div>
<SearchBar pid={this.props.router.query.pid} /> // Pass the query params to another component if needed
</div>
);
}
}
}
export default withRouter(User);

event bus in React?

I'm mainly using Vue, and just recently picked up React. Loving it so far, and its quite similar in a lot of ways to Vue, which makes learning it way easier.
Now, let's consider two siblings component. I want to trigger something in component number one, when something happens in component number two. In Vue you can just bind window.bus = new Vue, and then emit in one of the components bus.$emit('event') and bind in the mounted() of the second component bus.$on('event', this.doSth).
How can you achieve that in React?

Event Bus is only a Global Function Register, can you use it
class _EventBus {
constructor() {
this.bus = {};
}
$off(id) {
delete this.bus[id];
}
$on(id, callback) {
this.bus[id] = callback;
}
$emit(id, ...params) {
if(this.bus[id])
this.bus[id](...params);
}
}
export const EventBus = new _EventBus();
The export const prevent multiple instances, making the class static

In the case of two sibling components, you would hold the state in the parent component and pass that state as a prop to both siblings:
class ParentComponent extends Component {
state = {
specialProp: "bar"
}
changeProp = () => {
// this.setState..
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<FirstSibling specialProp={this.state.specialProp} />
<SecondSibling changeProp={this.changeProp} specialProp={this.state.specialProp} />
</div>
);
}
}

For those that are still searching, look at this article: https://www.pluralsight.com/guides/how-to-communicate-between-independent-components-in-reactjs
The solution uses:
document.addEventListener for $on;
document.dispatchEvent for $emit;
document.removeEventListener for $off;
In my use case I had a component that contained a Refresh button that would trigger a data refresh in other components.
I did everything as it was presented in the article. In case you're using React with Functional Components, you might want to use the following useEffect:
useEffect(() => {
// The component might unmount when the request is in progress.
// Because of this an error will appear when we'll try to 'setData'.
let isMounted = true
const getData = () => {
reqData(db, path)
.then(result => {
if (isMounted) {
setData(result) // This is a useState
}
})
}
eventBus.on('refreshData', (data) => {
getData()
})
getData()
return () => {
isMounted = false
eventBus.remove('refreshData')
}
// Do not change the end of this useEffect. Keep it as it is. It simulates componentDidMount.
// eslint-disable-next-line
}, [])

A parent component can manage the state and methods consumed by child components when passed down through props.
The following example increments a count. SibOne displays the count and a button in SibTwo increments the count.
class App extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
count: 0
};
}
incrementCount = () => {
this.setState({
count: this.state.count + 1
});
}
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
<SibOne count={this.state.count}/>
<SibTwo incrementCount={this.incrementCount}/>
</div>
);
}
}
const SibOne = props => <div>Count: {props.count}</div>;
const SibTwo = props => (
<button onClick={props.incrementCount}>
Increment Count
</button>
);
Demo: https://codesandbox.io/s/zqp9wj2n63
More on Components and Props: https://reactjs.org/docs/components-and-props.html

Write-Once, use everywhere Event Bus (PubSub) system
I have used Vue for a long time and I enjoyed using the Event Bus too, was a pain that it wasn't readily available on react. Although, after a lot of research, I came up with an approach that should be easy to implement.
You can leverage Event Listeners and the CustomEvent API to implement the Event Bus architecture.
// event-bus.js file
const EventBus = {
$on (eventType, callback) {
document.addEventListener(eventType, (ev) => callback(ev.detail))
},
$dispatch (eventType, data) {
const event = new CustomEvent(eventType, { detail: data })
document.dispatchEvent(event)
},
$remove (eventType, callback) {
document.removeEventListener(eventType, callback)
}
}
export default EventBus
You can now go ahead to import the EventBus object to any file of choice, here is what the usage looks like for me.
For the publisher:
// publisher.js file
EventBus.$dispatch(message.name, message.value)
And on the subscriber's end:
// subscriber.js file
EventBus.$on('user.connect', (data) => console.log(data))

rxjs is one more option that you can explore. check if that can help you as they are providing observable and event based programs. It is also doing similar thing like what Eventbus is doing in vuejs.

Fetch data only once per React component

I have a simple component that fetches data and only then displays it:
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
loaded: false
stuff: null
};
}
componentDidMount() {
// load stuff
fetch( { path: '/load/stuff' } ).then( stuff => {
this.setState({
loaded: true,
stuff: stuff
});
} );
}
render() {
if ( !this.state.loaded ) {
// not loaded yet
return false;
}
// display component based on loaded stuff
return (
<SomeControl>
{ this.state.stuff.map( ( item, index ) =>
<h1>items with stuff</h1>
) }
</SomeControl>
);
}
}
Each instance of MyComponent loads the same data from the same URL and I need to somehow store it to avoid duplicate requests to the server.
For example, if I have 10 MyComponent on page - there should be just one request (1 fetch).
My question is what's the correct way to store such data? Should I use static variable? Or I need to use two different components?
Thanks for advice!

For people trying to figure it out using functional component.
If you only want to fetch the data on mount then you can add an empty array as attribute to useEffect
So it would be :
useEffect( () => { yourFetch and set }, []) //Empty array for deps.

You should rather consider using state management library like redux, where you can store all the application state and the components who need data can subscribe to. You can call fetch just one time maybe in the root component of the app and all 10 instances of your component can subscribe to state.

If you want to avoid using redux or some kind of state management library, you can import a file which does the fetching for you. Something along these lines. Essentially the cache is stored within the fetcher.js file. When you import the file, it's not actually imported as separate code every time, so the cache variable is consistent between imports. On the first request, the cache is set to the Promise; on followup requests the Promise is just returned.
// fetcher.js
let cache = null;
export default function makeRequest() {
if (!cache) {
cache = fetch({
path: '/load/stuff'
});
}
return cache;
}
// index.js
import fetcher from './fetcher.js';
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
loaded: false
stuff: null
};
}
componentDidMount() {
// load stuff
fetcher().then( stuff => {
this.setState({
loaded: true,
stuff: stuff
});
} );
}
render() {
if ( !this.state.loaded ) {
// not loaded yet
return false;
}
// display component based on loaded stuff
return (
<SomeControl>
{ this.state.stuff.map( ( item, index ) =>
<h1>items with stuff</h1>
) }
</SomeControl>
);
}
}

You can use something like the following code to join active requests into one promise:
const f = (cache) => (o) => {
const cached = cache.get(o.path);
if (cached) {
return cached;
}
const p = fetch(o.path).then((result) => {
cache.delete(o.path);
return result;
});
cache.set(o.path, p);
return p;
};
export default f(new Map());//use Map as caching

If you want to simulate the single fetch call with using react only. Then You can use Provider Consumer API from react context API. There you can make only one api call in provider and can use the data in your components.
const YourContext = React.createContext({});//instead of blacnk object you can have array also depending on your data type of response
const { Provider, Consumer } = YourContext
class ProviderComponent extends React.Component {
componentDidMount() {
//make your api call here and and set the value in state
fetch("your/url").then((res) => {
this.setState({
value: res,
})
})
}
render() {
<Provider value={this.state.value}>
{this.props.children}
</Provider>
}
}
export {
Provider,
Consumer,
}
At some top level you can wrap your Page component inside Provider. Like this
<Provider>
<YourParentComponent />
</Provider>
In your components where you want to use your data. You can something like this kind of setup
import { Consumer } from "path to the file having definition of provider and consumer"
<Consumer>
{stuff => <SomeControl>
{ stuff.map( ( item, index ) =>
<h1>items with stuff</h1>
) }
</SomeControl>
}
</Consumer>
The more convenient way is to use some kind of state manager like redux or mobx. You can explore those options also. You can read about Contexts here
link to context react website
Note: This is psuedo code. for exact implementation , refer the link
mentioned above

If your use case suggests that you may have 10 of these components on the page, then I think your second option is the answer - two components. One component for fetching data and rendering children based on the data, and the second component to receive data and render it.
This is the basis for “smart” and “dumb” components. Smart components know how to fetch data and perform operations with those data, while dumb components simply render data given to them. It seems to me that the component you’ve specified above is too smart for its own good.

React.js "global" component that can be created multiple times

I can't get my head wrapped around this.
The problem: let's say there's an app and there can be some sort of notifications/dialogs/etc that i want to create from my code.
I can have "global" component and manage it, but it would limit me to only one notification at a time, this will not fit.
render() {
<App>
// Some components...
<Notification />
</App>
}
Or i can manage multiple notifications by the component Notification itself. But state management will not be clear.
The other problem if i have some sort of user confirmation from that component (if it's a confirmation dialog instead of simple notification) this will not be very convinient to handle with this solution.
The other solution is to render a component manually. Something like:
notify(props) {
const wrapper = document.body.appendChild(document.createElement('div'))
const component = ReactDOM.render(React.createElement(Notification, props), wrapper)
//...
// return Promise or component itself
}
So i would call as:
notify({message: '...'})
.then(...)
or:
notify({message: '...', onConfirm: ...})
This solution seems hacky, i would like to let React handle rendering, and i have an additional needless div. Also, if React API changes, my code breaks.
What is the best practice for this scenario? Maybe i'm missing something completely different?

You could use React Context for this.
You create a React context at a high level in your application and then associate a values to it. This should allow components to create / interact with notifications.
export const NotificationContext = React.createContext({
notifications: [],
createNotification: () => {}
});
class App extends Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {
notifications: []
};
this.createNotification = this.createNotification.bind(this);
}
createNotification(body) {
this.setState(prevState => ({
notifications: [body, ...prevState.notifications]
}));
}
render() {
const { notifications } = this.state;
const contextValue = {
notifications,
createNotification: this.createNotification
};
return (
<NotificationContext.Provider value={contextValue}>
<NotificationButton />
{notifications.map(notification => (
<Notification body={notification} />
))}
</NotificationContext.Provider>
);
}
}
The notifications are stored in an array to allow multiple at a time. Currently, this implementation will never delete them but this functionality can be added.
To create a notification, you will use the corresponding context consumer from within the App. I have added a simple implementation here for demonstration purposes.
import { NotificationContext } from "./App.jsx";
const NotificationButton = () => (
<NotificationContext.Consumer>
{({ notifications, createNotification }) => (
<button onClick={() => createNotification(notifications.length)}>
Add Notification
</button>
)}
</NotificationContext.Consumer>
);
You can view the working example here.

Why can't I curry a react component?

I've been getting started with react-redux and finding it a very interesting way to simplify the front end code for an application using many objects that it acquires from a back end service where the objects need to be updated on the front end in approximately real time.
Using a container class largely automates the watching (which updates the objects in the store when they change). Here's an example:
const MethodListContainer = React.createClass({
render(){
return <MethodList {...this.props} />},
componentDidMount(){
this.fetchAndWatch('/list/method')},
componentWillUnmount(){
if (isFunction(this._unwatch)) this._unwatch()},
fetchAndWatch(oId){
this.props.fetchObject(oId).then((obj) => {
this._unwatch = this.props.watchObject(oId);
return obj})}});
In trying to supply the rest of the application with as simple and clear separation as possible, I tried to supply an alternative 'connect' which would automatically supply an appropriate container thus:
const connect = (mapStateToProps, watchObjectId) => (component) => {
const ContainerComponent = React.createClass({
render(){
return <component {...this.props} />
},
componentDidMount(){
this.fetchAndWatch()},
componentWillUnmount(){
if (isFunction(this._unwatch)) this._unwatch()},
fetchAndWatch(){
this.props.fetchObject(watchObjectId).then((obj) => {
this._unwatch = this.props.watchObject(watchObjectId);
return obj})}
});
return reduxConnect(mapStateToProps, actions)(ContainerComponent)
};
This is then used thus:
module.exports = connect(mapStateToProps, '/list/method')(MethodList)
However, component does not get rendered. The container is rendered except that the component does not get instantiated or rendered. The component renders (and updates) as expected if I don't pass it as a parameter and reference it directly instead.
No errors or warnings are generated.
What am I doing wrong?

This is my workaround rather than an explanation for the error:
In connect_obj.js:
"use strict";
import React from 'react';
import {connect} from 'react-redux';
import {actions} from 'redux/main';
import {gets} from 'redux/main';
import {isFunction, omit} from 'lodash';
/*
A connected wrapper that expects an oId property for an object it can get in the store.
It fetches the object and places it on the 'obj' property for its children (this prop will start as null
because the fetch is async). It also ensures that the object is watched while the children are mounted.
*/
const mapStateToProps = (state, ownProps) => ({obj: gets.getObject(state, ownProps.oId)});
function connectObj(Wrapped){
const HOC = React.createClass({
render(){
return <Wrapped {...this.props} />
},
componentDidMount(){
this.fetchAndWatch()},
componentWillUnmount(){
if (isFunction(this._unwatch)) this._unwatch()},
fetchAndWatch(){
const {fetchObject, watchObject, oId} = this.props;
fetchObject(oId).then((obj) => {
this._unwatch = watchObject(oId);
return obj})}});
return connect(mapStateToProps, actions)(HOC)}
export default connectObj;
Then I can use it anywhere thus:
"use strict";
import React from 'react';
import connectObj from 'redux/connect_obj';
const Method = connectObj(React.createClass({
render(){
const {obj, oId} = this.props;
return (obj) ? <p>{obj.id}: {obj.name}/{obj.function}</p> : <p>Fetching {oId}</p>}}));
So connectObj achieves my goal of creating a project wide replacement for setting up the connect explicitly along with a container component to watch/unwatch the objects. This saves quite a lot of boiler plate and gives us a single place to maintain the setup and connection of the store to the components whose job is just to present the objects that may change over time (through updates from the service).
I still don't understand why my first attempt does not work and this workaround does not support injecting other state props (as all the actions are available there is no need to worry about the dispatches).

Try using a different variable name for the component parameter.
const connect = (mapStateToProps, watchObjectId) => (MyComponent) => {
const ContainerComponent = React.createClass({
render() {
return <MyComponent {...this.props} obj={this.state.obj} />
}
...
fetchAndWatch() {
fetchObject(watchObjectId).then(obj => {
this._unwatch = watchObject(watchObjectId);
this.setState({obj});
})
}
});
...
}
I think the problem might be because the component is in lower case (<component {...this.props} />). JSX treats lowercase elements as DOM element and capitalized as React element.
Edit:
If you need to access the obj data, you'll have to pass it as props to the component. Updated the code snippet