How to combine two regex using AND operator - javascript

I have a dilemma in using regex as I am very new in using this:
I have the URL below:
var url = https://website.com/something-here/page.html?p=null#confirmation?order=123
My expected result is:
/something-here/page.html #confirmation
It could be a space or a comma or simply combine the two(/something-here/page.html#confirmation)
I can do this using two regex below:
var a= url.match(/som([^#]+).html/)[0];
var b= url.match(/#([^#]+).tion/)[0];
console.log(a,b);
But I would like to have it done as a single regex with the same result.

You can use RegExp's group system to your advantage. Here's a snippet:
var matches = url.match(/(som[^#]+.html).*?(#[^#]+.tion)/);
console.log(matches[1] + " " + matches[2]); // prints /something-here/page.html #confirmation
I combined your two RegExp conditions into one, while enclosing them with parenthesis in the correct areas to create two groups.
That way, you can get the specified group and add a space in between.

Aside the fact that your example url is malformed (you have two search params), therefore not very suitable to work with - I have e proposition:
Why not use the URL object and its properties?
url = new URL("https://website.com/something-here/page.html?p=null#confirmation?order=123");
and precisely grab the properties with explicit syntax as in:
url.pathname; >> "something-here/page.html"
url.hash; >> "#confirmation?order=123"
But in case you explicitly need a RegExp variant
here is one
var url = "https://website.com/something-here/page.html?p=null#confirmation?order=123";
var match = url.match(/\/som.*?html|\#.*?tion/g);
console.log(match.join(" "));

Use each your condition in scope "( )" More details answer try find here

Related

Regex or substring operation to strip out a URL from a keyword onwards [duplicate]

This question already has an answer here:
Reference - What does this regex mean?
(1 answer)
Closed 2 years ago.
I'm struggling to figure out the best way to strip out all the content in a URL from a specific keyword onwards (including the keyword), using either regex or a substring operation. So if I have an example dynamic URL http://example.com/category/subcat/filter/size/1/ - I would like to strip out the /filter/size/1 element of the URL and leave me with the remaining URL as a separate string. Grateful for any pointers. I should clarify that the number of arguments after the filter keyword isn't fixed and could be more than in my example and the number of category arguments prior to the filter keyword isn't fixed either
To be a little safer you could use the URL object to handle most of the parsing and then
just sanitize the pathname.
const filteredUrl = 'http://example.com/category/subcat/filter/test?param1&param2=test';
console.log(unfilterUrl(filteredUrl));
function unfilterUrl(urlString) {
const url = new URL(urlString);
url.pathname = url.pathname.replace(/(?<=\/)filter(\/|$).*/i, '');
return url.toString();
}
You can tweak this a little based on your need. Like it might be the case where filter is not present in the URL. but lets assume it is present then consider the following regex expression.
/(.*)\/filter\/(.*)/g
the first captured group ( can be obtained by $1 ) is the portion of the string behind the filter keyword and the second captured group ( obtained by $2 ) will contain all your filters present after the filter keyword
have a look at example i tried on regextester.com
Use the split() function.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/split
url='http://example.com/category/subcat/filter/size/1/';
console.log(url.split('/filter')[0]);
Split
The simplest solution that occurs to me is the following:
const url = 'http://example.com/category/subcat/filter/size/1/';
const [base, filter] = url.split('/filter/');
// where:
// base == 'http://example.com/category/subcat'
// filter == 'size/1/'
If you expect more than one occurrence of '/filter/', use the limit parameter of String.split(): url.split('/filter/', 2);
RegExp
The assumption of the above is that after the filter parameter, everything is part of the filter. If you need more granularity, you can use a regex that terminates at the '?', for example. This will remove everything from 'filter/anything/that/follows' that immediately follows a / and until the first query string separator ?, not including.
const filterRegex = /(?<=\/)filter(\/|$)[^?]*/i;
function parseURL(url) {
const match = url.match(filterRegex);
if (!match) { return [url, null, null]; } // expect anything
const stripped = url.replace(filterRegex, '');
return [url, stripped, match[0]];
}
const [full, stripped, filter] = parseURL('http://example.com/category/subcat/filter/size/1/?query=string');
// where:
// stripped == 'http://example.com/category/subcat/?query=string'
// filter == 'filter/size/1/'
I'm sadly not able to post the full answer here, as i'ts telling me 'it looks like spam'. I created a gist with the original answer. In it i talk about the details of String.prototype.match and of JS/ES regex in general including named capture groups and pitfalls. And incude a link to a great regex tool: regex101. I'm not posting the link here in fear of triggering the filter again. But back to the topic:
In short, a simple regext can be used to split and format it (using filter as the keyword):
/^(.*)(\/filter\/.*)$/
or with named groups:
/^(?<main>.*)(?<stripped>\/filter\/.*)$/
(note that the forward slashes need to be escaped in a regex literal)
Using String.prototype.match with that regex will return an array of the matches: index 1 will be the first capture group (so everything before the keyword), index 2 will be everything after that (including the keyword).
Again, all the details can be found in the gist

How can I inverse matched result of the pattern?

Here is my string:
Organization 2
info#something.org.au more#something.com market#gmail.com single#noidea.com
Organization 3
headmistress#money.com head#skull.com
Also this is my pattern:
/^.*?#[^ ]+|^.*$/gm
As you see in the demo, the pattern matches this:
Organization 2
info#something.org.au
Organization 3
headmistress#money.com
My question: How can I make it inverse? I mean I want to match this:
more#something.com market#gmail.com single#noidea.com
head#skull.com
How can I do that? Actually I can write a new (and completely different) pattern to grab expected result, but I want to know, Is "inverting the result of a pattern" possible?
No, I don't believe there is a way to directly inverse a Regular Expression but keeping it the same otherwise.
However, you could achieve something close to what you're after by using your existing RegExp to replace its matches with an empty string:
var everythingThatDidntMatchStr = str.replace(/^.*?#[^ ]+|^.*$/gm, '');
You can replace the matches from first RegExp by using Array.prototype.forEach() to replace matched RegExp with empty string using `String.ptototype.replace();
var re = str.match(/^.*?#[^ ]+|^.*$/gm);
var res = str;
re.forEach(val => res = res.replace(new RegExp(val), ""));

Finding image url via using Regex

Any working Regex to find image url ?
Example :
var reg = /^url\(|url\(".*"\)|\)$/;
var string = 'url("http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg")';
var string2 = 'url(http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg)';
console.log(string.match(reg));
console.log(string2.match(reg));
I tied but fail with this reg
pattern will look like this, I just want image url between url(" ") or url( )
I just want to get output like http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg
http://jsbin.com/ahewaq/1/edit
I'd simply use this expression:
/url.*\("?([^")]+)/
This returns an array, where the first index (0) contains the entire match, the second will be the url itself, like so:
'url("http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg")'.match(/url.*\("?([^")]+)/)[1];
//returns "http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg"
//or without the quotes, same return, same expression
'url(http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg)'.match(/url.*\("?([^")]+)/)[1];
If there is a change that single and double quotes are used, you can simply replace all " by either '" or ['"], in this case:
/url.*\(["']?([^"')]+)/
Try this regexp:
var regex = /\burl\(\"?(.*?)\"?\)/;
var match = regex.exec(string);
console.log(match[1]);
The URL is captured in the first subgroup.
If the string will always be consistent, one option would be simply to remove the first 4 characters url(" and the last two "):
var string = 'url("http://domain.com/randompath/random4509324041123213.jpg")';
// Remove last two characters
string = string.substr(0, string.length - 2);
// Remove first five characters
string = string.substr(5, string.length);
Here's a working fiddle.
Benefit of this approach: You can edit it yourself, without asking StackOverflow to do it for you. RegEx is great, but if you don't know it, peppering your code with it makes for a frustrating refactor.

How to split a long regular expression into multiple lines in JavaScript?

I have a very long regular expression, which I wish to split into multiple lines in my JavaScript code to keep each line length 80 characters according to JSLint rules. It's just better for reading, I think.
Here's pattern sample:
var pattern = /^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|(\".+\"))#((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$/;
Extending #KooiInc answer, you can avoid manually escaping every special character by using the source property of the RegExp object.
Example:
var urlRegex= new RegExp(''
+ /(?:(?:(https?|ftp):)?\/\/)/.source // protocol
+ /(?:([^:\n\r]+):([^#\n\r]+)#)?/.source // user:pass
+ /(?:(?:www\.)?([^\/\n\r]+))/.source // domain
+ /(\/[^?\n\r]+)?/.source // request
+ /(\?[^#\n\r]*)?/.source // query
+ /(#?[^\n\r]*)?/.source // anchor
);
or if you want to avoid repeating the .source property you can do it using the Array.map() function:
var urlRegex= new RegExp([
/(?:(?:(https?|ftp):)?\/\/)/ // protocol
,/(?:([^:\n\r]+):([^#\n\r]+)#)?/ // user:pass
,/(?:(?:www\.)?([^\/\n\r]+))/ // domain
,/(\/[^?\n\r]+)?/ // request
,/(\?[^#\n\r]*)?/ // query
,/(#?[^\n\r]*)?/ // anchor
].map(function(r) {return r.source}).join(''));
In ES6 the map function can be reduced to:
.map(r => r.source)
[Edit 2022/08] Created a small github repository to create regular expressions with spaces, comments and templating.
You could convert it to a string and create the expression by calling new RegExp():
var myRE = new RegExp (['^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\\s#\"]+(\\.[^<>(),[\]\\.,;:\\s#\"]+)*)',
'|(\\".+\\"))#((\\[[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.',
'[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\\.)+',
'[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$'].join(''));
Notes:
when converting the expression literal to a string you need to escape all backslashes as backslashes are consumed when evaluating a string literal. (See Kayo's comment for more detail.)
RegExp accepts modifiers as a second parameter
/regex/g => new RegExp('regex', 'g')
[Addition ES20xx (tagged template)]
In ES20xx you can use tagged templates. See the snippet.
Note:
Disadvantage here is that you can't use plain whitespace in the regular expression string (always use \s, \s+, \s{1,x}, \t, \n etc).
(() => {
const createRegExp = (str, opts) =>
new RegExp(str.raw[0].replace(/\s/gm, ""), opts || "");
const yourRE = createRegExp`
^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|
(\".+\"))#((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|
(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$`;
console.log(yourRE);
const anotherLongRE = createRegExp`
(\byyyy\b)|(\bm\b)|(\bd\b)|(\bh\b)|(\bmi\b)|(\bs\b)|(\bms\b)|
(\bwd\b)|(\bmm\b)|(\bdd\b)|(\bhh\b)|(\bMI\b)|(\bS\b)|(\bMS\b)|
(\bM\b)|(\bMM\b)|(\bdow\b)|(\bDOW\b)
${"gi"}`;
console.log(anotherLongRE);
})();
Using strings in new RegExp is awkward because you must escape all the backslashes. You may write smaller regexes and concatenate them.
Let's split this regex
/^foo(.*)\bar$/
We will use a function to make things more beautiful later
function multilineRegExp(regs, options) {
return new RegExp(regs.map(
function(reg){ return reg.source; }
).join(''), options);
}
And now let's rock
var r = multilineRegExp([
/^foo/, // we can add comments too
/(.*)/,
/\bar$/
]);
Since it has a cost, try to build the real regex just once and then use that.
Thanks to the wonderous world of template literals you can now write big, multi-line, well-commented, and even semantically nested regexes in ES6.
//build regexes without worrying about
// - double-backslashing
// - adding whitespace for readability
// - adding in comments
let clean = (piece) => (piece
.replace(/((^|\n)(?:[^\/\\]|\/[^*\/]|\\.)*?)\s*\/\*(?:[^*]|\*[^\/])*(\*\/|)/g, '$1')
.replace(/((^|\n)(?:[^\/\\]|\/[^\/]|\\.)*?)\s*\/\/[^\n]*/g, '$1')
.replace(/\n\s*/g, '')
);
window.regex = ({raw}, ...interpolations) => (
new RegExp(interpolations.reduce(
(regex, insert, index) => (regex + insert + clean(raw[index + 1])),
clean(raw[0])
))
);
Using this you can now write regexes like this:
let re = regex`I'm a special regex{3} //with a comment!`;
Outputs
/I'm a special regex{3}/
Or what about multiline?
'123hello'
.match(regex`
//so this is a regex
//here I am matching some numbers
(\d+)
//Oh! See how I didn't need to double backslash that \d?
([a-z]{1,3}) /*note to self, this is group #2*/
`)
[2]
Outputs hel, neat!
"What if I need to actually search a newline?", well then use \n silly!
Working on my Firefox and Chrome.
Okay, "how about something a little more complex?"
Sure, here's a piece of an object destructuring JS parser I was working on:
regex`^\s*
(
//closing the object
(\})|
//starting from open or comma you can...
(?:[,{]\s*)(?:
//have a rest operator
(\.\.\.)
|
//have a property key
(
//a non-negative integer
\b\d+\b
|
//any unencapsulated string of the following
\b[A-Za-z$_][\w$]*\b
|
//a quoted string
//this is #5!
("|')(?:
//that contains any non-escape, non-quote character
(?!\5|\\).
|
//or any escape sequence
(?:\\.)
//finished by the quote
)*\5
)
//after a property key, we can go inside
\s*(:|)
|
\s*(?={)
)
)
((?:
//after closing we expect either
// - the parent's comma/close,
// - or the end of the string
\s*(?:[,}\]=]|$)
|
//after the rest operator we expect the close
\s*\}
|
//after diving into a key we expect that object to open
\s*[{[:]
|
//otherwise we saw only a key, we now expect a comma or close
\s*[,}{]
).*)
$`
It outputs /^\s*((\})|(?:[,{]\s*)(?:(\.\.\.)|(\b\d+\b|\b[A-Za-z$_][\w$]*\b|("|')(?:(?!\5|\\).|(?:\\.))*\5)\s*(:|)|\s*(?={)))((?:\s*(?:[,}\]=]|$)|\s*\}|\s*[{[:]|\s*[,}{]).*)$/
And running it with a little demo?
let input = '{why, hello, there, "you huge \\"", 17, {big,smelly}}';
for (
let parsed;
parsed = input.match(r);
input = parsed[parsed.length - 1]
) console.log(parsed[1]);
Successfully outputs
{why
, hello
, there
, "you huge \""
, 17
,
{big
,smelly
}
}
Note the successful capturing of the quoted string.
I tested it on Chrome and Firefox, works a treat!
If curious you can checkout what I was doing, and its demonstration.
Though it only works on Chrome, because Firefox doesn't support backreferences or named groups. So note the example given in this answer is actually a neutered version and might get easily tricked into accepting invalid strings.
There are good answers here, but for completeness someone should mention Javascript's core feature of inheritance with the prototype chain. Something like this illustrates the idea:
RegExp.prototype.append = function(re) {
return new RegExp(this.source + re.source, this.flags);
};
let regex = /[a-z]/g
.append(/[A-Z]/)
.append(/[0-9]/);
console.log(regex); //=> /[a-z][A-Z][0-9]/g
The regex above is missing some black slashes which isn't working properly. So, I edited the regex. Please consider this regex which works 99.99% for email validation.
let EMAIL_REGEXP =
new RegExp (['^(([^<>()[\\]\\\.,;:\\s#\"]+(\\.[^<>()\\[\\]\\\.,;:\\s#\"]+)*)',
'|(".+"))#((\\[[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.',
'[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\\-0-9]+\\.)+',
'[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$'].join(''));
To avoid the Array join, you can also use the following syntax:
var pattern = new RegExp('^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+' +
'(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|(\".+\"))#' +
'((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|' +
'(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$');
You can simply use string operation.
var pattenString = "^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|"+
"(\".+\"))#((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|"+
"(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$";
var patten = new RegExp(pattenString);
I tried improving korun's answer by encapsulating everything and implementing support for splitting capturing groups and character sets - making this method much more versatile.
To use this snippet you need to call the variadic function combineRegex whose arguments are the regular expression objects you need to combine. Its implementation can be found at the bottom.
Capturing groups can't be split directly that way though as it would leave some parts with just one parenthesis. Your browser would fail with an exception.
Instead I'm simply passing the contents of the capture group inside an array. The parentheses are automatically added when combineRegex encounters an array.
Furthermore quantifiers need to follow something. If for some reason the regular expression needs to be split in front of a quantifier you need to add a pair of parentheses. These will be removed automatically. The point is that an empty capture group is pretty useless and this way quantifiers have something to refer to. The same method can be used for things like non-capturing groups (/(?:abc)/ becomes [/()?:abc/]).
This is best explained using a simple example:
var regex = /abcd(efghi)+jkl/;
would become:
var regex = combineRegex(
/ab/,
/cd/,
[
/ef/,
/ghi/
],
/()+jkl/ // Note the added '()' in front of '+'
);
If you must split character sets you can use objects ({"":[regex1, regex2, ...]}) instead of arrays ([regex1, regex2, ...]). The key's content can be anything as long as the object only contains one key. Note that instead of () you have to use ] as dummy beginning if the first character could be interpreted as quantifier. I.e. /[+?]/ becomes {"":[/]+?/]}
Here is the snippet and a more complete example:
function combineRegexStr(dummy, ...regex)
{
return regex.map(r => {
if(Array.isArray(r))
return "("+combineRegexStr(dummy, ...r).replace(dummy, "")+")";
else if(Object.getPrototypeOf(r) === Object.getPrototypeOf({}))
return "["+combineRegexStr(/^\]/, ...(Object.entries(r)[0][1]))+"]";
else
return r.source.replace(dummy, "");
}).join("");
}
function combineRegex(...regex)
{
return new RegExp(combineRegexStr(/^\(\)/, ...regex));
}
//Usage:
//Original:
console.log(/abcd(?:ef[+A-Z0-9]gh)+$/.source);
//Same as:
console.log(
combineRegex(
/ab/,
/cd/,
[
/()?:ef/,
{"": [/]+A-Z/, /0-9/]},
/gh/
],
/()+$/
).source
);
Personally, I'd go for a less complicated regex:
/\S+#\S+\.\S+/
Sure, it is less accurate than your current pattern, but what are you trying to accomplish? Are you trying to catch accidental errors your users might enter, or are you worried that your users might try to enter invalid addresses? If it's the first, I'd go for an easier pattern. If it's the latter, some verification by responding to an e-mail sent to that address might be a better option.
However, if you want to use your current pattern, it would be (IMO) easier to read (and maintain!) by building it from smaller sub-patterns, like this:
var box1 = "([^<>()[\]\\\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\\.[^<>()[\\]\\\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)";
var box2 = "(\".+\")";
var host1 = "(\\[[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\])";
var host2 = "(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,})";
var regex = new RegExp("^(" + box1 + "|" + box2 + ")#(" + host1 + "|" + host2 + ")$");
#Hashbrown's great answer got me on the right track. Here's my version, also inspired by this blog.
function regexp(...args) {
function cleanup(string) {
// remove whitespace, single and multi-line comments
return string.replace(/\s+|\/\/.*|\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\//g, '');
}
function escape(string) {
// escape regular expression
return string.replace(/[-.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
}
function create(flags, strings, ...values) {
let pattern = '';
for (let i = 0; i < values.length; ++i) {
pattern += cleanup(strings.raw[i]); // strings are cleaned up
pattern += escape(values[i]); // values are escaped
}
pattern += cleanup(strings.raw[values.length]);
return RegExp(pattern, flags);
}
if (Array.isArray(args[0])) {
// used as a template tag (no flags)
return create('', ...args);
}
// used as a function (with flags)
return create.bind(void 0, args[0]);
}
Use it like this:
regexp('i')`
//so this is a regex
//here I am matching some numbers
(\d+)
//Oh! See how I didn't need to double backslash that \d?
([a-z]{1,3}) /*note to self, this is group #2*/
`
To create this RegExp object:
/(\d+)([a-z]{1,3})/i

Javascript Regex after specific string

I have several Javascript strings (using jQuery). All of them follow the same pattern, starting with 'ajax-', and ending with a name. For instance 'ajax-first', 'ajax-last', 'ajax-email', etc.
How can I make a regex to only grab the string after 'ajax-'?
So instead of 'ajax-email', I want just 'email'.
You don't need RegEx for this. If your prefix is always "ajax-" then you just can do this:
var name = string.substring(5);
Given a comment you made on another user's post, try the following:
var $li = jQuery(this).parents('li').get(0);
var ajaxName = $li.className.match(/(?:^|\s)ajax-(.*?)(?:$|\s)/)[1];
Demo can be found here
Below kept for reference only
var ajaxName = 'ajax-first'.match(/(\w+)$/)[0];
alert(ajaxName);
Use the \w (word) pattern and bind it to the end of the string. This will force a grab of everything past the last hyphen (assuming the value consists of only [upper/lower]case letters, numbers or an underscore).
The non-regex approach could also use the String.split method, coupled with Array.pop.
var parts = 'ajax-first'.split('-');
var ajaxName = parts.pop();
alert(ajaxName);
you can try to replace ajax- with ""
I like the split method #Brad Christie mentions, but I would just do
function getLastPart(str,delimiter) {
return str.split(delimiter)[1];
}
This works if you will always have only two-part strings separated by a hyphen. If you wanted to generalize it for any particular piece of a multiple-hyphenated string, you would need to write a more involved function that included an index, but then you'd have to check for out of bounds errors, etc.

Categories