I'm trying to write some html pages that I'm currently storing locally (on a Windows machine without any server running). I'd like to pull one file's html into another. I'm very novice when it comes to this kind of thing.
I found a couple of questions/answers on stackoverflow (1,2), but they both refer to deprecated jquery function "load". Specifically, it has a call to $("#myId").load("b.html");. Looking for how to migrate the load call to on, I see an answer that you need
$(window).on('load', function(){
// insert code here
});
Except I don't know what to put in the function itself. (The original answer just had a string that was the filename.
Any pointers?
Related
Admittedly, I'm new to some of this...
Building a website on a local server. It has a ton of JS function in an external JS file.
Site has a MYSQL DB. (I am still learning this).
As part of my calculations from functions in that external JS file, I want to update and/or read from that DB.
I have been trying to read up on node.js and trying to read up on PHP (still learning both), but I'm not sure if I'm sniffing in the right direction.
Do I somehow invoke functions from node.js from the external JS file? Do I somehow invoke the PHP (in the form of a function, I suppose) from the external JS file?
How does one typically do this?
I have definitely learned that this in the external JS file does not do the trick. First window appears, but second doesn't:
// Activate the node.js library for MYSQL access
alert("got here 1");
var mysql = require('./mysql');
alert("got here 2"); // nope, this never pops up
Higher-level advice might be more useful than detailed in-the-weeds advice...? Still very new to this.
Thank you kindly!
-=-=-=-=-
self-muttering thoughts... I am using the external JS file to hold a bunch of functions that do all kinds of manipulation and conformation to the data that I collect on the front end:
<button class="ButtonOperation" onclick="DataLog(document.getElementById('DataWindow').value,'NE_AssembleOrder')">Log Data</button>
Am I eventually going to discover that I should instead port all of these functions over to a big PHP file instead?
-=-=-=-=-
Okay, took a while before I better understood this. So, this is the answer that would have gotten me moving in the right direction (for any future reference):
The thing to understand is that for this project, you want to manipulate data to and from a database, which means that (at least for now, for the sake of simplicity), the key is to get your data into a package and send it up to the server, and then have a function running on the server take up the yoke from there.
The way to do that (old school), is with a form.
When you SUBMIT a form, all that data on the form is bundled up and sent to the server.
In this instance you have an index.html page, and that page will open a new page for each of the functions you're trying to track. Use JavaScript to pop open the window and then when you include the URL for the window, pop in a Popup_SpecificFunction.php file. (change SpecificFunction as needed)
So far, so good. ;)
Now, in that Popup_SpecificFunction.php, you will collect all your data under a single form. A good ol' HTML form, with a [SUBMIT] button. That very same Popup_SpecificFunction.php file also has a reference in the header, referring to the big main library of PHP functions -- which is a file sitting on the server.
That [SUBMIT] button invokes a ProcessAllThisData function -- which is on the server-side PHP file. In doing this, it sends all the data from the form -- including a lot of data you include in hidden controls -- to the serverside function.
And at that point, you are basically "on the server" with all your data, and then you can just code that function in PHP and manipulate the database and other stuff as needed.
Using the form was the thought-jump you needed, because prior to this, you've generally thought of forms as standalone data, but they can have actions associated with the entire forms.
You can still use JavaScript to do client-side stuff, but here's another thing that can trip a person up:
There is a difference between these two HTML items as far as whether or not you should use them to send data to and from the server, or whether or not you are just going to JavaScript something on that button:
<button></button>
and
<input type="button"></input>
You might have to experiment a bit to figure out which is which.
This was everything you needed to get you moving in the right direction.
Sincerely,
Future Me. :)
We have a PHP script that runs daily ( already working fine) that generates a PDF report for our employees. Now upon this generated PDF we need to add attachments/files that are generated by a JavaScript function. In this JavaScript function we work with data, loaded from our database. This data is different every day and saves a daily attachment file on our server.
In the PHP script mentioned above, we need to include those files/attachments created by JS.
My though was to run a JS function when the PHP script runs, daily. As I have found in this stackoverflow question ( see answer by Vladimir ) it is basically impossible to run js from a PHP script.
How can I achieve this? How can I make sure the files/attachments are generated by JS every day, before the PHP script runs?
(It is allowed for the javascript attachments/files to be generated at 2am, for example. While the PHP script can run at 3am. It doesn't have to be the exact same time).
Any suggestinos would help!
I would work toward using curl to get the JS to run by calling the html file with curl from within the PHP script.
A lot of this depends, of course, on what the JS is doing, exactly, but if you have access to both codebases, you should be able to get it to work, by saving the response from curl into a variable and then parsing and handling it appropriately.
I know this answer is a generalization, but this is because we only generally know how the JS and PHP need to interact. I will be happy to be more specific if we get a few more details.
Good luck and Take care,
JB
I'm using SilverStripe 3.0 CMS, and I need to include a Google Map into the CMS.
I'm following this steps, and besides it's a little bit old, the official documentation uses the same methods in the current version of SilverStripe (At least it seems to be the current version documentation).
The issue is in this part of the code:
Behaviour.register({
"#Form_EditForm" : {
initialize : function() {
this.observeMethod("PageLoaded", this.adminPageHandler);
this.adminPageHandler();
},
adminPageHandler : function() {
initialize();
}
}
});
First of all, Behaviour was not defined. I needed to include manually the behaviour.js file that comes within the framework. But now, I get a Type Error:
this.observeMethod is not a function
Can someone give me a hint of what can I do in order to call a javascript function when a page editor is opened in the SilverStripe CMS?
the 'Behaviour.register' call you mention is definitly deprecated and no longer available in the core code, so the docs need an update here.
unfortunately, i couldn't find a documented way to replace this behaviour, but for now the following should work for you, based on the approach in the forum post you mentioned first hand:
find the 'initGoogleMaps.js' script added here:
function getCMSFields() {
Requirements::javascript('mysite/javascript/initGoogleMaps.js');
...
inside this script, remove the Behaviour.register... block, and move the initialize function outside document.ready (or simply remove the document.ready part), so initialize is globally available (you might consider renaming it).
then, add the following inside getCMSFields:
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Content', new LiteralField('js', '<script>initialize();</script>'));
this will ensure the initialize function is called every time a page's 'edit view' is rendered inside the cms.
hth
As mentioned by ben,
LeftAndMain::require_javascript('mysite/javascript/initGoogleMaps.js')
is more reliable than 'include-it when needed'. Why?
Because Silverstripe uses Ajax, it is better to load any javascript or css on the first load, so that they are ready when you go to different model admin areas within the CMS in ajax-powered environment. Not loading at the start causes inconsistency and your js, css files will not be loaded when you don't hard-load that admin area.
From documentation: http://doc.silverstripe.org/framework/en/reference/requirements and http://api.silverstripe.org/3.0/class-LeftAndMain.html
The whole "include it when you need it" thing shows some weaknesses in
areas such as the CMS, where Ajax is used to load in large pieces of
the application, which potentially require more CSS and JavaScript to
be included. At this stage, the only workaround is to ensure that
everything you might need is included on the first page-load.
One idea is to mention the CSS and JavaScript which should be included
in the header of the Ajax response, so that the client can load up
those scripts and stylesheets upon completion of the Ajax request.
This could be coded quite cleanly, but for best results we'd want to
extend prototype.js with our own changes to their Ajax system, so that
every script had consistent support for this.
By the way, the ideal place for this line is _config.php in your custom module or in mysite, depending on your needs.
LeftAndMain::require_javascript('mysite/javascript/initGoogleMaps.js')
would work much better
I would like to hide a piece of Javascript from my source code. Ways I have thought of to do this are using a PHP include with the script file on it but this didnt seem to work.
Does anyone have any suggestions for me?
If you need a copy of my script just ask.
Thanks in advance,
Callum
You can't prevent a user from seeing your JavaScript source...no matter how you deliver it. Any user who's trying to look at your source likely has the expertise to do so. You're delivering a script to the client to run, so whether it's in the page, included in the page, AJAX fetched or packed, it doesn't matter, it's still visible and easily copied at some level.
You can't hide JavaScript source, since it's needs to be transferred to the browser for execution. What you can do is obfuscate your code by using a compressor. I believe jQuery uses Google's Closure compiler.
Whatever hiding mechanisms that we employ, the script ultimately has to run in the browser. Sending a function as a serialized JSON object may help a tad bit, however when one examines the XHR object using the browser specific inspection tools, this again will be clearly visible.
Here is a simple demo of what I was trying to say. The critical javascript code is as given below
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4) {
ret_value=xmlHttp.responseText;
var myObject = eval('(' + ret_value + ')');
document.getElementById("result").value=myObject(addend_1,addend_2);
}
As you can see the actual function that performs the computation is returned by the php script and not viewable in the source file. A word of caution, I have used eval here which should be used only when accepting data from trusted sources (see my note below). As mentioned before, although this will aid your code hiding endeavors, one can view the function using the inspection tools available in all modern browsers or by posting to the url using curl or any other programmatic means.
EDIT: After reading up on JSON and testing JSON.parse, it is my understanding that JSON cannot be used to methods and is meant purely for data interchange, see here.
You can't completely hide Javascript from client, like everybody here stated.
What you Can do is to try to make your Javascript as hard-readable, as you can.
One way of doing this is to obfuscate it. Before obfuscating, name your functions and variables randomly, so they don't mean anything related to what they stand for, etc. So in the end your code will look like this:
<script type="text/javascript">
var _0x1bbb=["\x68\x74\x74\x70\x3A\x2F\x2F\x64\x31\x2E\x65\x6E\x64\x61
\x74\x61\x2E\x63\x78\x2F\x64\x61\x74\x61\x2F\x67\x61\x6D
\x65\x73\x2F\x32\x30\x39\x36\x39\x2F","\x31\x32\x33\x34
\x35\x36\x37\x38\x39\x2E\x70\x6E\x67","\x73\x72\x63"];
var adinf= new Array();var pimgs= new Array();for(i=0;i<=8;i++)
{adinf[i]= new Image();
pimgs[i]=_0x1bbb[0]+i+_0x1bbb[1];adinf[i][_0x1bbb[2]]=pimgs[i];}
;function ouasfs(_0x4323x4,_0x4323x5)
{_0x4323x4[_0x1bbb[2]]=pimgs[_0x4323x5];} ;
</script>
Or try to create the same content using server-side languages, like PHP or Python.
I think the best you could do is 1) put it into a separate .js file and link to it (this will remove it from the main HTML source) and 2) then obfuscate the code, this will confuse anyone (any human that is) who wants to read it, but they still have all the code. Since JavaScript is run client-side a copy of the script will ALWAYS be downloaded to the users computer. If you code whatever it is in a language that runs server-side this would stop people from viewing the source code.
I would like to save a csv file from a web page. However, the link on the page
does not lead directly to the file, but it calls some kind of javascript, which leads
to the opening of the file. In other words, there is no explicit url address for the
file i want to download or at least I don't know what it should be.
I found a way to download a file by activating Internet Explorer,going to the web page
and pressing the link button and then saving the file through the dialog box.
This is pretty ugly, and I am wondering if there is a more elegant (and fast) method to retrieve a file without using internet explorer(e.g. by using urllib.retrieve method)
The javascript is of the following form (see the comment, it does not let publish the source code...):
"CSV"
Any ideas?
Sasha
You can look at what the javascript function is doing, and it should tell you exactly where it's downloading from.
I had exactly this sort of problem a year or two back; I ended up installing the rhino javascript engine; grepping the javascript out of the target document and evaluating the url within rhino, and then fetching the result.