ES6 String templating litterals : dealing with array - javascript

I'm trying to use the ES6 String template to query my database
My SQL is like :
SELECT * FROM table WHERE id IN ();
The in must contains each items of an array, so, i tried something like this :
return connector.query`SELECT * FROM table WHERE AnalogHistory.TagName IN (${sensor})`.then(result => {return result.recordset});
This doesn't work. But if i try something like this :
return connector.query`SELECT * FROM table WHERE AnalogHistory.TagName IN (${sensor[0]},${sensor[1]}, ${sensor[2]}, ...)`.then(result => {return result.recordset});
Well this time, it work. So do you guys know what differ and on to do it by the first way (the cleaner) ?

We can't be absolutely sure without knowing how query handles the tag parameters, but the difference is that in the first case, you've provided query with the array as a single parameter; and in the second case, you've provided query with a series of individual parameters with commas in-between them.
Apparently it's happy with the second, and not with the first. Whether there's a third option that would be less laborious but also functional depends entirely on how query is designed to be called.
Re your comment saying it's the mssql npm package: I don't see anything in its documentation to suggest that it supports passing arrays into the query tag function as parameters. Which is really unfortunate.

Related

How to use Prepared statements with npm sqlite library on node js

I am using this library for connecting my node js application to an sqlite database. I saw its documentation for how to use prepared statements here but it is very brief and I cannot understand how to use it for my use case.
Lets say I have an sql string like this:
const sql = "INSERT INTO tbl(name) VALUES (?)"
So as per the documentation guess I should first create a statement and then use bind to populate it:
const stmt = await db.prepare(sql)
stmt.bind({? : "John"})
Is this the right way to do this? Also once I have created the Prepared statement how am I supposed to run this. All the examples mentioned in the docs are select statements, but if it is an insert statement I suppose stmt.get() or stmt.all() method are not correct as there is no result set to return here. How then am I supposed to do this?
I don't know the sqlite library too well, but the following example from the documentation performs a parameterised INSERT statement:
const result = await db.run('INSERT INTO tbl(col) VALUES (:col)', {
':col': 'something'
})
I think you're focusing on the phrase 'prepared statement' a little too much.
Instead of looking only for this exact phrase, look for any use of parameters whose values are passed separately to the main SQL string. The example above fits this: there is a parameter :col which appears in the SQL string and the value for it is provided in an object passed to db.run alongside the SQL string.

Parse.com relations count

I want to query object from Parse DB through javascript, that has only 1 of some specific relation object. How can this criteria be achieved?
So I tried something like this, the equalTo() acts as a "contains" and it's not what I'm looking for, my code so far, which doesn't work:
var query = new Parse.Query("Item");
query.equalTo("relatedItems", someItem);
query.lessThan("relatedItems", 2);
It seems Parse do not provide a easy way to do this.
Without any other fields, if you know all the items then you could do the following:
var innerQuery = new Parse.Query('Item');
innerQuery.containedIn('relatedItems', [all items except someItem]);
var query = new Parse.Query('Item');
query.equalTo('relatedItems', someItem);
query.doesNotMatchKeyInQuery('objectId', 'objectId', innerQuery);
...
Otherwise, you might need to get all records and do filtering.
Update
Because of the data type relation, there are no ways to include the relation content into the results, you need to do another query to get the relation content.
The workaround might add a itemCount column and keep it updated whenever the item relation is modified and do:
query.equalTo('relatedItems', someItem);
query.equalTo('itemCount', 1);
There are a couple of ways you could do this.
I'm working on a project now where I have cells composed of users.
I currently have an afterSave trigger that does this:
const count = await cell.relation("members").query().count();
cell.put("memberCount",count);
This works pretty well.
There are other ways that I've considered in theory, but I've not used
them yet.
The right way would be to hack the ability to use select with dot
notation to grab a virtual field called relatedItems.length in the
query, but that would probably only work for me because I use PostGres
... mongo seems to be extremely limited in its ability to do this sort
of thing, which is why I would never make a database out of blobs of
json in the first place.
You could do a similar thing with an afterFind trigger. I'm experimenting with that now. I'm not sure if it will confuse
parse to get an attribute back which does not exist in its schema, but
I'll find out, by the end of today. I have found that if I jam an artificial attribute into the objects in the trigger, they are returned
along with the other data. What I'm not sure about is whether Parse will decide that the object is dirty, or, worse, decide that I'm creating a new attribute and store it to the database ... which could be filtered out with a beforeSave trigger, but not until after the data had all been sent to the cloud.
There is also a place where i had to do several queries from several
tables, and would have ended up with a lot of redundant data. So I wrote a cloud function which did the queries, and then returned a couple of lists of objects, and a few lists of objectId strings which
served as indexes. This worked pretty well for me. And tracking the
last load time and sending it back when I needed up update my data allowed me to limit myself to objects which had changed since my last query.

jQuery/JavaScript regex return matched text from string

I am trying to create a fairly complex system for my website. I want to be able to write some pseudo like code and then parse it to make it do something in my back-end.
My data is inside two $.each loops as this is an Object of data with multiple levels to it.
For instance, I want to take a string like this:
"<!this!> == <!PropertyStreetNumber!>"
Then how I would like for the above code to executed is this:
FormData[parentKey][this] == FormData[parentKey]["PropertyStreetNumber"]
Thanks for any help!
Here's some of my code, the code where this would need to go in (see commented area)
http://jsbin.com/liquvetapibu/1/
Is there any restriction not to use regular expressions on JavaScript?
You could do something like this:
var myString = "<!this!> == <!PropertyStreetNumber!>";
var aux = /<!(.*?)!> == <!(.*?)!>/.exec(myString);
The value of aux will be an array with 3 elements:
The string that was tested.
The first element within <! !>
The second element within <! !>
Then it would depend on what the content on each one is: in your example this is an object, while you seem to use PropertyStreetNumber as a string (maybe a typo?). If you want to use it as an object, you will have to use eval() (e.g.: eval(aux[1])) while if you want to use it as a string, you can use it directly (e.g.: aux[2]).
Conceptually, the first thing you would need to do is determine the type of statement you are working with. In this case, a comparison statement. So you need a regex statement to filter this into a "statement type".
Once you do that, you can figure out what the arguments are. So you create a regex to pull out the arguments on each side of the operator.
Next, the strings that represent action code items need to be parsed. The this argument is actually an object, whereas "PropertyStreetNumber" is a string. You've got to be able to determine which is which. Then you can filter that into a function that has been created specifically to handle those statements types.
If at all possible, I would try to avoid the use of eval(). You can get into trouble with it.
you could try with
var beg = str.indexOf("== <!") + 5;
to find the index of the beggining and then slice counting the chars from beginning like
str.slice(beg, -2);
and from there build the rest.
couldnt that work?`

How to handle indices in Neo4j server via javascript REST client?

I have data in a standalone Neo4j REST server, including an index of nodes. I want pure JavaScript client to connect to Neo4j and serve the formatted data to d3.js, a visualisation library built on Node.js.
JugglingDB is very popular, but the Neo4j implementation was done "wrong": https://github.com/1602/jugglingdb/issues/56
The next most popular option on github is: https://github.com/thingdom/node-neo4j
looking at the method definitions https://github.com/thingdom/node-neo4j/blob/develop/lib/GraphDatabase._coffee
I'm able to use "getNodeById: (id, _) ->"
> node1 = db.getNodeById(12, callback);
returns the output from the REST server, including node properties. Awesome.
I can't figure out how to use "getIndexedNodes: (index, property, value, _) ->"
> indexedNodes = db.getIndexedNodes:(index1, username, Homer, callback);
...
indexedNodes don't get defined. I've tried a few different combinations. No joy. How do I use this command?
Also, getIndexedNodes() requires a key-value pair. Is there any way to get all, or a subset of the items in the index without looping?
One of the authors/maintainers of node-neo4j here. =)
indexedNodes don't get defined. I've tried a few different combinations. No joy. How do I use this command?
Your example seems to have some syntax errors. Are index1, username and Homer variables defined elsewhere? Assuming not, i.e. assuming those are the actual index name, property name and value, they need to be quoted as string literals, e.g. 'index1', 'username' and 'Homer'. But you also have a colon right before the opening parenthesis that shouldn't be there. (That's what's causing the Node.js REPL to not understand your command.)
Then, note that indexedNodes should be undefined -- getIndexedNodes(), like most Node.js APIs, is asynchronous, so its return value is undefined. Hence the callback parameter.
You can see an example of how getIndexedNodes() is used in the sample node-neo4j-template app the README references:
https://github.com/aseemk/node-neo4j-template/blob/2012-03-01/models/user.js#L149-L160
Also, getIndexedNodes() requires a key-value pair. Is there any way to get all, or a subset of the items in the index without looping?
getIndexedNodes() does return all matching nodes, so there's no looping required. Getting a subset isn't supported by Neo4j's REST API directly, but you can achieve the result with Cypher.
E.g. to return the 6th-15th user (assuming they have a type property set to user) sorted alphabetically by username:
db.query([
'START node=node:index1(type="user")',
'RETURN node ORDER BY node.username',
'SKIP 5 LIMIT 10'
].join('\n'), callback);
Cypher is still rapidly evolving, though, so be sure to reference the documentation that matches the Neo4j version you're using.
As mentioned above, in general, take a look at the sample node-neo4j-template app. It covers a breadth of features that the library exposes and that a typical app would need.
Hope this helps. =)
Neo4j 2 lets you do indices VIA REST. Docs here
REST Indicies

Lucene-like searching through JSON objects in JavaScript

I have a pretty big array of JSON objects (its a music library with properties like artist, album etc, feeding a jqgrid with loadonce=true) and I want to implement lucene-like (google-like) query through whole set - but locally, i.e. in the browser, without communication with web server. Are there any javascript frameworks that will help me?
Go through your records, to create a one time index by combining all search
able fields in a single string field called index.
Store these indexed records in an Array.
Partition the Array on index .. like all a's in one array and so on.
Use the javascript function indexOf() against the index to match the query entered by the user and find records from the partitioned Array.
That was the easy part but, it will support all simple queries in a very efficient manner because the index does not have to be re-created for every query and indexOf operation is very efficient. I have used it for searching up to 2000 records. I used a pre-sorted Array. Actually, that's how Gmail and yahoo mail work. They store your contacts on browser in a pre-sorted array with an index that allows you to see the contact names as you type.
This also gives you a base to build on. Now you can write an advanced query parsing logic on top of it. For example, to support a few simple conditional keywords like - AND OR NOT, will take about 20-30 lines of custom JavaScript code. Or you can find a JS library that will do the parsing for you the way Lucene does.
For a reference implementation of above logic, take a look at how ZmContactList.js sorts and searches the contacts for autocomplete.
You might want to check FullProof, it does exactly that:
https://github.com/reyesr/fullproof
Have you tried CouchDB?
Edit:
How about something along these lines (also see http://jsfiddle.net/7tV3A/1/):
var filtered_collection = [];
var query = 'foo';
$.each(collection, function(i,e){
$.each(e, function(ii, el){
if (el == query) {
filtered_collection.push(e);
}
});
});
The (el == query) part of course could/should be modified to allow more flexible search patterns than exact match.

Categories