How can I create animated stylized text, as well as some other animated graphic elements such as seen in this video around 1:21: https://vimeo.com/69200399
Can anyone help me start off, not help with a full code but just with things to research.
There are a lot of ways to do this, but I think you should look into SVG. It will render natively in-browser so will be of high quality. None of the elements you're referencing have much complexity... just shapes. The animation can be done via script. There are also some tools to help you with animation tweening if that's the route you go.
Another way is to use a tool such as Adobe After Effects and render a video. Then, you can use whatever effects you want and you will have a guaranteed look at the end. The downside is that you won't be able to adapt to different screen resolutions, and the quality won't be as high because the animation will be rasterized before anyone sees it. If you need transparency on the video, look into VP9 with alpha channel.
Related
Example
Video Example
The lack of selection styling in paperjs makes you improvise and one way to style them, is to create them yourself ( recommended on this post).
But the huge con with this is the performance! Where canvas quickly goes from usable 60fps to terrible 20 within seconds. Now the only method I thought would work to style your handles/points, is now useless.
Now I'm out of ideas as to how style them and I'm trying to seek the help of stackoverflow... The main thing that I want to achieve is the hover effect on handles/points . At this point I coded the most of the stuff in paperjs, and I really wouldn't want to switch everything to something else like PixiJs.
P.S Any help is appreciated!
In your video, the frame rate goes down because you draw a lot of paths and this would also happen at some point even with the native Paper.js selection.
So your only chance is to try to have as few as possible shapes in your scene.
Maybe you can take advantage of the less known features of Paper.js to reduce them a bit:
item.selectedColor
paper.settings.handleSize
Then, there is also the possibility of using SymbolItem for repeted shapes (like your circles) that should have better performances than regular paths.
Finally, if you're out of solutions, you could also fork the library and hook into the selection drawing code to adapt to your needs :).
I am trying to make my website a live background of space. I am attempting to get the stars to spawn on the left of the screen and slowly move over. And occasionally their will be stars that come in from other directions. My question is, how should I go about doing this?
Would it be smartest to make a Javascript, script that would make a LOT of <div>'s and then move them all randomly? Or would it be smartest to use a canvas? I've never used a canvas before so I don't know all it's uses yet.
Here's a link to the effect I'm trying to emulate (It's a YouTube video with music) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8MsE-4dygY&list=PL21A7A915E7020E73&index=16
I'm trying to emulate what the stars or partices are doing in the background of that video, so how should I go about this? (I'm not asking for all the code, I'm just making that clear.) Thanks in advance! :)
well, you can obviously use a Parallax background with some overlays for an easy effect, but you can go further by using any of the many scripts out there, search Google for that. Or you can learn how to do it via scripting with this great tutorial that makes use of HTML5 and CSS3
Canvas may be more performant than adding lots of divs as you won't need to create a large DOM tree. DOM operations are expensive and can cause memory thrashing if you repeatedly create and destroy lots of elements. Using multiple overlaid images and CSS3 translate transitions should be more performant still, but may make it harder to achieve all the effects that you want - randomized movement, separation of stars on the same plane, etc. etc.
I want to write some animation with html5 canvas element. I found that there are some js libraries that help to leverage canvas functionality. For example KineticJS, FabricJS. But I don't know which library to use.
What is pros and cons when using this libraries? Or may be you know even better implementation?
edit
I'm going to create something similar to static picture, but with piece оf animation. For example floating clouds on the sky, flower where you can tear off a petal and throw it. May be some animation with sun. This is general description, hope this helps.
There is Processing.js, which is a port of Processing for Java. Processing.js is ideal for 2d images.
Raphaël uses svg to draw images, which results in more compatibility.
For 3d there is Three.js, which uses both canvas and webgl.
There are a lot of different libraries around, you should first find out what you want to draw.
http://javascript.open-libraries.com/utilities/drawing/10-best-javascript-drawing-and-canvas-libraries/
cgSceneGraph is a javascript animation framework providing a full animation engine with timelines, animation keys, ...
It also provides helper methods to easily add animations on every attribute of an element.
The example on the home page of the website is exactly what you talk about, so it should fit your need :)
For simple animations forget the canvas and use position: absolute div elements with background image that you can move around with CSS transform translate3d and scale3d.
The 2nd part of the question is, which javascript library is better/easier to manipulate images with? I won't be actually drawing any shapes or anything. Other info: I'll be using jQuery and don't need to support all browsers, just webkit.
Edit:
More information: the current design is to layout/draw several rows/columns of images in a grid-like layout, with the image in the center being in "focus" (a little larger, with a border or something and some text next to it). The tricky thing is that we want the whole canvas of images to appear to slide/glide over to bring another random image into focus. So obviously the number of images in this grid needs to exceed what is visible in the viewport so that when the transition occurs there are always images occupying the canvas. Other than moving the images around, I won't be blurring them or otherwise modifying them. Eventually we will add user interactions like clicking/touching on a visible image to bring it to focus manually.
Let me know if this is not clear or still confusing.
I ran across scripty2 which seems like an alternative to using canvas/SVG for my purposes. I also started farting around with EaselJS last night, and it seems like this might work, but I'm wondering if it'll end up being more work/complex than just using standard HTML/CSS and a tool like Scripty2 to aid with animations and click/touch events. Just looking for any suggestions. Thanks!
The answer depends on your manipulation and animation.
If it's just translations, CSS wins for speed compared to canvas. I haven't tested, but I feel confident it easily beats SVG for the same sort of thing.
If you're going to be doing non-affine transformations or otherwise messing with the images (e.g. blurring them) you clearly want Canvas.
If you need event handlers per object, you clearly want a retained-mode drawing system like SVG or HTML+CSS. I haven't done enough CSS3 transforms to say how they compare in terms of speed to SVG, but they clearly do not have the robust transformation DOM of SVG.
This is a rather subjective question (or suite of questions) and you haven't yet given sufficient information for a clear answer to be possible.
Kind of a dilemma here. I am making a mobile version of a website, that has some interactive things more specifically I have this object in 3D that you can spin, I was using papervision in Flash but now I need to do this differently since there is no flash in mobile and I feel I am on thin ice.
I was thinking of exporting a 360 degree spin # 30 FPS using a PNG sequence with alpha channel, and then simply stiching them together into a sprite, then using this as a background in CSS and using background-position to then "simulate" an animation.
That or simply switch source image very rapidly, or somehow using "canvas" maybe, the thing is I am not sure if this will produce completely subpar performance? I mean switching the background-position or image source file # 30 FPS is that even possible? Would it be smooth, or is this simply something that is not feasible todo yet? Keep in mind it's just one single 3D object that needs to spin based on user input, not any other interactive elements.
So is sprite the way togo or canvas or something cool I havent even heard of? Thanks everyone in advance!
If I was making a mobile version of a website, I would strip it of most of the graphics and definitely of all the animated gifs, flash, etc. -- people using mobile phones for browsing the web are usually not after the multimedia experience -- they just need some information quickly and use a suboptimal device with poor bandwidth and even worse display and performance to get it. Don't make it even harder for them.
On the other hand, I found that using a background image with all the frames of animation in it, and manipulating the background-position from javascript is a fine way of making small animated sprites, for example for a simple javascript game for mobile phones :)