JavaScript: Regex on decimals formatting - javascript

In my current app, I am implementing field validation with regex for forms.
More specifically, I am having trouble handling edge-case for numbers with decimals.
Essentially I am using regex to prevent users from typing wrong information in to the input fields.
For instance, if user would type 12.2 and then . afterwards, I am using regex to detect what shouldn't be there, and replace with empty string, ''
Here's my current implementation using a call back function:
export const checkFormat = (typeFormat, value) => {
//value is stringified
switch (typeFormat) {
//...
case NUMERIC_DECIMALS: {
return value.replace(/(\d+\.\d+)(\.*)\d*/g, '$1')
}
}
}
However, the current regex implementation can't handle such cases as
User types : ., then .. ==> .
User types : 123.2, then 1.23.2 ==> 1.232
I'm fairly new to Regex, so obviously it needs some work

You can try this:
^(\d+(?:\.\d+)).*$
and replace by this:
$1
Regex 101 demo
Or to get the a more complex solution, which I guess you are looking for, you may try this:
const regex = /^(\d+(?:\.\d*))|(\.)?/gm;
const str = ["1.2","...","g..g","1.23","1.2.3.4",".,",".,","123.2","1.23.2","14","1","15.6.4789756465","g"];
const replaceRegex = /[^\.\d]/gm;
for(var i=0;i<str.length;i++)
{
var res=str[i].replace(replaceRegex,'').split(regex);
var finalResult="";
var alreadyContainsDot=false;
for(var j=0;j<res.length;j++)
if(res[j]!=null && res[j]!="")
{
if(res[j].includes(".") && !alreadyContainsDot)
alreadyContainsDot=true;
else if(res[j].includes(".") && alreadyContainsDot)
res[j]=res[j].replace(/\./gm,'');
finalResult+=res[j];
}
console.log(str[i]+"==>"+finalResult);
}

If my interpretation of the requirement is correct, this should work:
const regex = /(\d+\.?\d+?)(\D+)/g;
const str = `131/1.13.ad`;
const subst = `$1`;
// The substituted value will be contained in the result variable
const result = str.replace(regex, subst);
console.log('Substitution result: ', result);
Regex101 link

It is bad UX practice to monitor what the user is typing and change his input out from underneath him. He is likely to think his keyboard is broken. I don't know when or how this approach became so widespread, but thankfully it seems to be dying out.
In any case, it is always a bad idea to try to do things with numbers using regexps, which are fundamentally designed for manipulating strings. If for some reason you need to check if some string is a valid number, use numeric APIs such as !isNaN(+value).
Use the appropriate type or pattern attributes on your input fields to do validation. If that does not suffice, validate when the user presses the "Submit" button or equivalent.

Related

How to escape apostrophe successfully in jQuery on iPhone that has Smart Punctuation

I haven't been able to successfully escape Apostrophe on iPhone. After some research, it seems the Smart Punctation feature is causing some issues here. I've tried everything I can find and nothing has worked.
A user is entering text into a field and I verify if this text is correct. Here is my jQuery code. The valid Text is EMPORER'S EYE or Emporer's Eye, but neither ever comes up as valid on iPhone.
$("#actionButton").click(function() {
var seats = $("#number2").val();
var apostrophe = '\u0027';
var error = null;
if ((seats === "EMPORER\'S EYE") || (seats === 'Emporer\'s Eye')) {
$("#message").fadeIn();
$("#draggable").fadeOut();
$("#draggable2").fadeOut();
} else {
$("#messageWrong").fadeIn().delay(2500).fadeOut();
$("#draggable").fadeOut().delay(2500).fadeIn();
$("#draggable2").fadeOut().delay(2500).fadeIn();
}
// If you really need setflag:
var setflag = error != null;
});
Here is a codepen I have of the entire function and process I'm trying to put together.
https://codepen.io/MaxwellR/pen/BaYGPJL
In order to make user experience less frustrating, I would skip on checking the special characters, as this is a slippery slope.
You can convert both input and expected value to certain format that allows some degree of liberty in how people spell things. Consider this example:
const sanitizeString = string => string
.trim() // remove surrounding whitespace
.toLowerCase() // ignore the case
.replaceAll(/[^\p{L}\s]/gu, '') // cut out all special characters
.replaceAll(/\s+/g, ' '); // convert any consecutive whitespace to a space
This can be a good balance between being correct and having some freedom to spell things differently.
const string = 'Emporer\'s Eye';
const sanitizedString = sanitizeString(string);
// sanitizedString is now "emporers eye"
In your case, you could have a single value inside the condition and it would work:
if (sanitizedString(seats) === sanitizedString('Emporer\'s Eye')) {
// some magic
}

Regex to match #word [duplicate]

I am writing an application in Node.js that allows users to mention each other in messages like on twitter. I want to be able to find the user and send them a notification. In order to do this I need to pull #usernames to find mentions from a string in node.js?
Any advice, regex, problems?
I have found that this is the best way to find mentions inside of a string in javascript.
var str = "#jpotts18 what is up man? Are you hanging out with #kyle_clegg";
var pattern = /\B#[a-z0-9_-]+/gi;
str.match(pattern);
["#jpotts18", "#kyle_clegg"]
I have purposefully restricted it to upper and lowercase alpha numeric and (-,_) symbols in order to avoid periods that could be confused for usernames like (#j.potts).
This is what twitter-text.js is doing behind the scenes.
// Mention related regex collection
twttr.txt.regexen.validMentionPrecedingChars = /(?:^|[^a-zA-Z0-9_!#$%&*#@]|RT:?)/;
twttr.txt.regexen.atSigns = /[#@]/;
twttr.txt.regexen.validMentionOrList = regexSupplant(
'(#{validMentionPrecedingChars})' + // $1: Preceding character
'(#{atSigns})' + // $2: At mark
'([a-zA-Z0-9_]{1,20})' + // $3: Screen name
'(\/[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9_\-]{0,24})?' // $4: List (optional)
, 'g');
twttr.txt.regexen.endMentionMatch = regexSupplant(/^(?:#{atSigns}|[#{latinAccentChars}]|:\/\/)/);
Please let me know if you have used anything that is more efficient, or accurate. Thanks!
Twitter has a library that you should be able to use for this. https://github.com/twitter/twitter-text-js.
I haven't used it, but if you trust its description, "the library provides autolinking and extraction for URLs, usernames, lists, and hashtags.". You should be able to use it in Node with npm install twitter-text.
While I understand that you're not looking for Twitter usernames, the same logic still applies and you should be able to use it fine (it does not validate that extracted usernames are valid twitter usernames). If not, forking it for your own purposes may be a very good place to start.
Edit: I looked at the docs closer, and there is a perfect example of what you need right here.
var usernames = twttr.txt.extractMentions("Mentioning #twitter and #jack")
// usernames == ["twitter", "jack"]
here is how you extract mentions from instagram caption with JavaScript and underscore.
var _ = require('underscore');
function parseMentions(text) {
var mentionsRegex = new RegExp('#([a-zA-Z0-9\_\.]+)', 'gim');
var matches = text.match(mentionsRegex);
if (matches && matches.length) {
matches = matches.map(function(match) {
return match.slice(1);
});
return _.uniq(matches);
} else {
return [];
}
}
I would respect names with diacritics, or character from any language \p{L}.
/(?<=^| )#\p{L}+/gu
Example on Regex101.com with description.
PS:
Don't use \B since it will match ##wrong.

How to find any of the specific characters exists in a string

Im looking for a solution to search the existence of given characters in a string. That means if any of the given characters present in a string, it should return true.
Now am doing it with arrays and loops. But honestly I feel its not a good way. So is there is any easiest way without array or loop?
var special = ['$', '%', '#'];
var mystring = ' using it to replace VLOOKUP entirely.$ But there are still a few lookups that you are not sure how to perform. Most importantly, you would like to be able to look up a value based on multiple criteria within separate columns.';
var exists = false;
$.each(special, function(index, item) {
if (mystring.indexOf(item) >= 0) {
exists = true;
}
});
console.info(exists);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
try with regex
var patt = /[$%#]/;
console.log(patt.test("using it to replace VLOOKUP entirely.$ But there are still a few lookups that you are not sure how to perform. Most importantly, you would like to be able to look up a value based on multiple criteria within separate columns."));
Be aware that [x] in regEx is for single characters only.
If you say wanted to search for say replace, it's going to look for anything with 'r,e,p,l,a,c' in the string.
Another thing to be aware of with regEx is escaping. Using a simple escape regEx found here -> Is there a RegExp.escape function in Javascript? I've made a more generic find in string.
Of course you asked given characters in a string, so this is more of an addenum answer for anyone finding this post on SO. As looking at your original question of an array of strings, it might be easy for people to think that's what you could just pass to the regEx. IOW: your questions wasn't how can I find out if $, %, # exist in a string.
var mystring = ' using it to replace VLOOKUP entirely.$ But there are still a few lookups that you are not sure how to perform. Most importantly, you would like to be able to look up a value based on multiple criteria within separate columns.';
function makeStrSearchRegEx(findlist) {
return new RegExp('('+findlist.map(
s=>s.replace(/[-\/\\^$*+?.()|[\]{}]/g, '\\$&')).join('|')+')');
}
var re = makeStrSearchRegEx(['$', '%', '#', 'VLOOKUP']);
console.log(re.test(mystring)); //true
console.log(re.test('...VLOOKUP..')); //true
console.log(re.test('...LOOKUP..')); //false
The best way is to use regular expressions. You can read more about it here.
In your case you should do something like this:
const specialCharacters = /[$%#]/;
const myString = ' using it to replace VLOOKUP entirely.$ But there are still a few lookups that you are not sure how to perform. Most importantly, you would like to be able to look up a value based on multiple criteria within separate columns.';
if(specialCharacters.test(myString)) {
console.info("Exists...");
}
Please, note, that it is good approach to store regular expressions in a variable to prevent creating of regular expression (which is not the fastest operation) each time you use it.

Get id from url

I have the following example url: #/reports/12/expense/11.
I need to get the id just after the reports -> 12. What I am asking here is the most suitable way to do this. I can search for reports in the url and get the content just after that ... but what if in some moment I decide to change the url, I will have to change my algorythm.
What do You think is the best way here. Some code examples will be also very helpfull.
It's hard to write code that is future-proof since it's hard to predict the crazy things we might do in the future!
However, if we assume that the id will always be the string of consecutive digits in the URL then you could simply look for that:
function getReportId(url) {
var match = url.match(/\d+/);
return (match) ? Number(match[0]) : null;
}
getReportId('#/reports/12/expense/11'); // => 12
getReportId('/some/new/url/report/12'); // => 12
You should use a regular expression to find the number inside the string. Passing the regular expression to the string's .match() method will return an array containing the matches based on the regular expression. In this case, the item of the returned array that you're interested in will be at the index of 1, assuming that the number will always be after reports/:
var text = "#/reports/12/expense/11";
var id = text.match(/reports\/(\d+)/);
alert(id[1]);
\d+ here means that you're looking for at least one number followed by zero to an infinite amount of numbers.
var text = "#/reports/12/expense/11";
var id = text.match("#/[a-zA-Z]*/([0-9]*)/[a-zA-Z]*/")
console.log(id[1])
Regex explanation:
#/ matches the characters #/ literally
[a-zA-Z]* - matches a word
/ matches the character / literally
1st Capturing group - ([0-9]*) - this matches a number.
[a-zA-Z]* - matches a word
/ matches the character / literally
Regular expressions can be tricky (add expensive). So usually if you can efficiently do the same thing without them you should. Looking at your URL format you would probably want to put at least a few constraints on it otherwise the problem will be very complex. For instance, you probably want to assume the value will always appear directly after the key so in your sample report=12 and expense=11, but report and expense could be switched (ex. expense/11/report/12) and you would get the same result.
I would just use string split:
var parts = url.split("/");
for(var i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
if(parts[i] === "report"){
this.reportValue = parts[i+1];
i+=2;
}
if(parts[i] === "expense"){
this.expenseValue = parts[i+1];
i+=2;
}
}
So this way your key/value parts can appear anywhere in the array
Note: you will also want to check that i+1 is in the range of the parts array. But that would just make this sample code ugly and it is pretty easy to add in. Depending on what values you are expecting (or not expecting) you might also want to check that values are numbers using isNaN

How to split a long regular expression into multiple lines in JavaScript?

I have a very long regular expression, which I wish to split into multiple lines in my JavaScript code to keep each line length 80 characters according to JSLint rules. It's just better for reading, I think.
Here's pattern sample:
var pattern = /^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|(\".+\"))#((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$/;
Extending #KooiInc answer, you can avoid manually escaping every special character by using the source property of the RegExp object.
Example:
var urlRegex= new RegExp(''
+ /(?:(?:(https?|ftp):)?\/\/)/.source // protocol
+ /(?:([^:\n\r]+):([^#\n\r]+)#)?/.source // user:pass
+ /(?:(?:www\.)?([^\/\n\r]+))/.source // domain
+ /(\/[^?\n\r]+)?/.source // request
+ /(\?[^#\n\r]*)?/.source // query
+ /(#?[^\n\r]*)?/.source // anchor
);
or if you want to avoid repeating the .source property you can do it using the Array.map() function:
var urlRegex= new RegExp([
/(?:(?:(https?|ftp):)?\/\/)/ // protocol
,/(?:([^:\n\r]+):([^#\n\r]+)#)?/ // user:pass
,/(?:(?:www\.)?([^\/\n\r]+))/ // domain
,/(\/[^?\n\r]+)?/ // request
,/(\?[^#\n\r]*)?/ // query
,/(#?[^\n\r]*)?/ // anchor
].map(function(r) {return r.source}).join(''));
In ES6 the map function can be reduced to:
.map(r => r.source)
[Edit 2022/08] Created a small github repository to create regular expressions with spaces, comments and templating.
You could convert it to a string and create the expression by calling new RegExp():
var myRE = new RegExp (['^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\\s#\"]+(\\.[^<>(),[\]\\.,;:\\s#\"]+)*)',
'|(\\".+\\"))#((\\[[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.',
'[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\\.)+',
'[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$'].join(''));
Notes:
when converting the expression literal to a string you need to escape all backslashes as backslashes are consumed when evaluating a string literal. (See Kayo's comment for more detail.)
RegExp accepts modifiers as a second parameter
/regex/g => new RegExp('regex', 'g')
[Addition ES20xx (tagged template)]
In ES20xx you can use tagged templates. See the snippet.
Note:
Disadvantage here is that you can't use plain whitespace in the regular expression string (always use \s, \s+, \s{1,x}, \t, \n etc).
(() => {
const createRegExp = (str, opts) =>
new RegExp(str.raw[0].replace(/\s/gm, ""), opts || "");
const yourRE = createRegExp`
^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|
(\".+\"))#((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|
(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$`;
console.log(yourRE);
const anotherLongRE = createRegExp`
(\byyyy\b)|(\bm\b)|(\bd\b)|(\bh\b)|(\bmi\b)|(\bs\b)|(\bms\b)|
(\bwd\b)|(\bmm\b)|(\bdd\b)|(\bhh\b)|(\bMI\b)|(\bS\b)|(\bMS\b)|
(\bM\b)|(\bMM\b)|(\bdow\b)|(\bDOW\b)
${"gi"}`;
console.log(anotherLongRE);
})();
Using strings in new RegExp is awkward because you must escape all the backslashes. You may write smaller regexes and concatenate them.
Let's split this regex
/^foo(.*)\bar$/
We will use a function to make things more beautiful later
function multilineRegExp(regs, options) {
return new RegExp(regs.map(
function(reg){ return reg.source; }
).join(''), options);
}
And now let's rock
var r = multilineRegExp([
/^foo/, // we can add comments too
/(.*)/,
/\bar$/
]);
Since it has a cost, try to build the real regex just once and then use that.
Thanks to the wonderous world of template literals you can now write big, multi-line, well-commented, and even semantically nested regexes in ES6.
//build regexes without worrying about
// - double-backslashing
// - adding whitespace for readability
// - adding in comments
let clean = (piece) => (piece
.replace(/((^|\n)(?:[^\/\\]|\/[^*\/]|\\.)*?)\s*\/\*(?:[^*]|\*[^\/])*(\*\/|)/g, '$1')
.replace(/((^|\n)(?:[^\/\\]|\/[^\/]|\\.)*?)\s*\/\/[^\n]*/g, '$1')
.replace(/\n\s*/g, '')
);
window.regex = ({raw}, ...interpolations) => (
new RegExp(interpolations.reduce(
(regex, insert, index) => (regex + insert + clean(raw[index + 1])),
clean(raw[0])
))
);
Using this you can now write regexes like this:
let re = regex`I'm a special regex{3} //with a comment!`;
Outputs
/I'm a special regex{3}/
Or what about multiline?
'123hello'
.match(regex`
//so this is a regex
//here I am matching some numbers
(\d+)
//Oh! See how I didn't need to double backslash that \d?
([a-z]{1,3}) /*note to self, this is group #2*/
`)
[2]
Outputs hel, neat!
"What if I need to actually search a newline?", well then use \n silly!
Working on my Firefox and Chrome.
Okay, "how about something a little more complex?"
Sure, here's a piece of an object destructuring JS parser I was working on:
regex`^\s*
(
//closing the object
(\})|
//starting from open or comma you can...
(?:[,{]\s*)(?:
//have a rest operator
(\.\.\.)
|
//have a property key
(
//a non-negative integer
\b\d+\b
|
//any unencapsulated string of the following
\b[A-Za-z$_][\w$]*\b
|
//a quoted string
//this is #5!
("|')(?:
//that contains any non-escape, non-quote character
(?!\5|\\).
|
//or any escape sequence
(?:\\.)
//finished by the quote
)*\5
)
//after a property key, we can go inside
\s*(:|)
|
\s*(?={)
)
)
((?:
//after closing we expect either
// - the parent's comma/close,
// - or the end of the string
\s*(?:[,}\]=]|$)
|
//after the rest operator we expect the close
\s*\}
|
//after diving into a key we expect that object to open
\s*[{[:]
|
//otherwise we saw only a key, we now expect a comma or close
\s*[,}{]
).*)
$`
It outputs /^\s*((\})|(?:[,{]\s*)(?:(\.\.\.)|(\b\d+\b|\b[A-Za-z$_][\w$]*\b|("|')(?:(?!\5|\\).|(?:\\.))*\5)\s*(:|)|\s*(?={)))((?:\s*(?:[,}\]=]|$)|\s*\}|\s*[{[:]|\s*[,}{]).*)$/
And running it with a little demo?
let input = '{why, hello, there, "you huge \\"", 17, {big,smelly}}';
for (
let parsed;
parsed = input.match(r);
input = parsed[parsed.length - 1]
) console.log(parsed[1]);
Successfully outputs
{why
, hello
, there
, "you huge \""
, 17
,
{big
,smelly
}
}
Note the successful capturing of the quoted string.
I tested it on Chrome and Firefox, works a treat!
If curious you can checkout what I was doing, and its demonstration.
Though it only works on Chrome, because Firefox doesn't support backreferences or named groups. So note the example given in this answer is actually a neutered version and might get easily tricked into accepting invalid strings.
There are good answers here, but for completeness someone should mention Javascript's core feature of inheritance with the prototype chain. Something like this illustrates the idea:
RegExp.prototype.append = function(re) {
return new RegExp(this.source + re.source, this.flags);
};
let regex = /[a-z]/g
.append(/[A-Z]/)
.append(/[0-9]/);
console.log(regex); //=> /[a-z][A-Z][0-9]/g
The regex above is missing some black slashes which isn't working properly. So, I edited the regex. Please consider this regex which works 99.99% for email validation.
let EMAIL_REGEXP =
new RegExp (['^(([^<>()[\\]\\\.,;:\\s#\"]+(\\.[^<>()\\[\\]\\\.,;:\\s#\"]+)*)',
'|(".+"))#((\\[[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.',
'[0-9]{1,3}\])|(([a-zA-Z\\-0-9]+\\.)+',
'[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$'].join(''));
To avoid the Array join, you can also use the following syntax:
var pattern = new RegExp('^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+' +
'(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|(\".+\"))#' +
'((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|' +
'(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$');
You can simply use string operation.
var pattenString = "^(([^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\.[^<>()[\]\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)|"+
"(\".+\"))#((\[[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\.[0-9]{1,3}\])|"+
"(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,}))$";
var patten = new RegExp(pattenString);
I tried improving korun's answer by encapsulating everything and implementing support for splitting capturing groups and character sets - making this method much more versatile.
To use this snippet you need to call the variadic function combineRegex whose arguments are the regular expression objects you need to combine. Its implementation can be found at the bottom.
Capturing groups can't be split directly that way though as it would leave some parts with just one parenthesis. Your browser would fail with an exception.
Instead I'm simply passing the contents of the capture group inside an array. The parentheses are automatically added when combineRegex encounters an array.
Furthermore quantifiers need to follow something. If for some reason the regular expression needs to be split in front of a quantifier you need to add a pair of parentheses. These will be removed automatically. The point is that an empty capture group is pretty useless and this way quantifiers have something to refer to. The same method can be used for things like non-capturing groups (/(?:abc)/ becomes [/()?:abc/]).
This is best explained using a simple example:
var regex = /abcd(efghi)+jkl/;
would become:
var regex = combineRegex(
/ab/,
/cd/,
[
/ef/,
/ghi/
],
/()+jkl/ // Note the added '()' in front of '+'
);
If you must split character sets you can use objects ({"":[regex1, regex2, ...]}) instead of arrays ([regex1, regex2, ...]). The key's content can be anything as long as the object only contains one key. Note that instead of () you have to use ] as dummy beginning if the first character could be interpreted as quantifier. I.e. /[+?]/ becomes {"":[/]+?/]}
Here is the snippet and a more complete example:
function combineRegexStr(dummy, ...regex)
{
return regex.map(r => {
if(Array.isArray(r))
return "("+combineRegexStr(dummy, ...r).replace(dummy, "")+")";
else if(Object.getPrototypeOf(r) === Object.getPrototypeOf({}))
return "["+combineRegexStr(/^\]/, ...(Object.entries(r)[0][1]))+"]";
else
return r.source.replace(dummy, "");
}).join("");
}
function combineRegex(...regex)
{
return new RegExp(combineRegexStr(/^\(\)/, ...regex));
}
//Usage:
//Original:
console.log(/abcd(?:ef[+A-Z0-9]gh)+$/.source);
//Same as:
console.log(
combineRegex(
/ab/,
/cd/,
[
/()?:ef/,
{"": [/]+A-Z/, /0-9/]},
/gh/
],
/()+$/
).source
);
Personally, I'd go for a less complicated regex:
/\S+#\S+\.\S+/
Sure, it is less accurate than your current pattern, but what are you trying to accomplish? Are you trying to catch accidental errors your users might enter, or are you worried that your users might try to enter invalid addresses? If it's the first, I'd go for an easier pattern. If it's the latter, some verification by responding to an e-mail sent to that address might be a better option.
However, if you want to use your current pattern, it would be (IMO) easier to read (and maintain!) by building it from smaller sub-patterns, like this:
var box1 = "([^<>()[\]\\\\.,;:\s#\"]+(\\.[^<>()[\\]\\\\.,;:\s#\"]+)*)";
var box2 = "(\".+\")";
var host1 = "(\\[[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\.[0-9]{1,3}\\])";
var host2 = "(([a-zA-Z\-0-9]+\\.)+[a-zA-Z]{2,})";
var regex = new RegExp("^(" + box1 + "|" + box2 + ")#(" + host1 + "|" + host2 + ")$");
#Hashbrown's great answer got me on the right track. Here's my version, also inspired by this blog.
function regexp(...args) {
function cleanup(string) {
// remove whitespace, single and multi-line comments
return string.replace(/\s+|\/\/.*|\/\*[\s\S]*?\*\//g, '');
}
function escape(string) {
// escape regular expression
return string.replace(/[-.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
}
function create(flags, strings, ...values) {
let pattern = '';
for (let i = 0; i < values.length; ++i) {
pattern += cleanup(strings.raw[i]); // strings are cleaned up
pattern += escape(values[i]); // values are escaped
}
pattern += cleanup(strings.raw[values.length]);
return RegExp(pattern, flags);
}
if (Array.isArray(args[0])) {
// used as a template tag (no flags)
return create('', ...args);
}
// used as a function (with flags)
return create.bind(void 0, args[0]);
}
Use it like this:
regexp('i')`
//so this is a regex
//here I am matching some numbers
(\d+)
//Oh! See how I didn't need to double backslash that \d?
([a-z]{1,3}) /*note to self, this is group #2*/
`
To create this RegExp object:
/(\d+)([a-z]{1,3})/i

Categories