I am using create-react-app. I am trying to call an image from my public folder from a file inside my src/components. I am receiving this error message.
./src/components/website_index.js Module not found: You attempted to
import ../../public/images/logo/WC-BlackonWhite.jpg which falls
outside of the project src/ directory. Relative imports outside of
src/ are not supported. You can either move it inside src/, or add a
symlink to it from project's node_modules/.
import logo from '../../public/images/logo_2016.png';
<img className="Header-logo" src={logo} alt="Logo" />
I have read many things saying you can do an import to the path but that is still not working for me. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I know there are many questions like this but they are all telling me to import logo or image so clearly I am missing something in the big picture.
This is special restriction added by developers of create-react-app. It is implemented in ModuleScopePlugin to ensure files reside in src/. That plugin ensures that relative imports from app's source directory don't reach outside of it.
There is no official way to disable this feature except using eject and modify webpack config.
But, most features and its updates are hidden into the internals of create-react-app system. If you make eject you will have no more new features and its update. So if you are not ready to manage and configure application included to configure webpack and so on - do not do eject operation.
Play by the existing rules - move assets to src or use based on public folder url without import.
However instead of eject there are much unofficial solutions, based on
rewire which allows you to programmatically modify the webpack config without eject. But removing the ModuleScopePlugin plugin is not good - this loses some protection and does not adds some features available in src. ModuleScopePlugin is designed to support multiple folders.
The better way is to add fully working additional directories similar to src also protected by ModuleScopePlugin. This can be done using react-app-alias
Anyway do not import from public folder - that will be duplicated in the build folder and will be available by two different url (and with different ways to load), which ultimately worsen the package download size.
Importing from the src folder is preferable and has advantages. Everything will be packed by webpack to the bundle with chunks optimal size and for best loading efficiency.
The package react-app-rewired can be used to remove the plugin. This way you do not have to eject.
Follow the steps on the npm package page (install the package and flip the calls in the package.json file) and use a config-overrides.js file similar to this one:
const ModuleScopePlugin = require('react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin');
module.exports = function override(config, env) {
config.resolve.plugins = config.resolve.plugins.filter(plugin => !(plugin instanceof ModuleScopePlugin));
return config;
};
This will remove the ModuleScopePlugin from the used WebPack plugins, but leave the rest as it was and removes the necessity to eject.
Remove it using Craco:
module.exports = {
webpack: {
configure: webpackConfig => {
const scopePluginIndex = webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.findIndex(
({ constructor }) => constructor && constructor.name === 'ModuleScopePlugin'
);
webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.splice(scopePluginIndex, 1);
return webpackConfig;
}
}
};
If your images are in the public folder then you should use
"/images/logo_2016.png"
in your <img> src instead of importing
'../../public/images/logo_2016.png';
This will work
<img className="Header-logo" src="/images/logo_2016.png" alt="Logo" />
To offer a little bit more information to other's answers. You have two options regarding how to deliver the .png file to the user. The file structure should conform to the method you choose. The two options are:
Use the module system (import x from y) provided with react-create-app and bundle it with your JS. Place the image inside the src folder.
Serve it from the public folder and let Node serve the file. create-react-app also apparently comes with an environment variable e.g. <img src={process.env.PUBLIC_URL + '/img/logo.png'} />;. This means you can reference it in your React app but still have it served through Node, with your browser asking for it separately in a normal GET request.
Source: create-react-app
There are a few answers that provide solutions with react-app-rewired, but customize-cra includes a removeModuleScopePlugin() API which is a bit more elegant. (It's the same solution, but abstracted away by the customize-cra package.)
npm i --save-dev react-app-rewired customize-cra
package.json
"scripts": {
- "start": "react-scripts start"
+ "start": "react-app-rewired start",
...
},
config-overrides.js
const { removeModuleScopePlugin } = require('customize-cra')
module.exports = removeModuleScopePlugin()
I was able to import files outside of src/ by "copying" the outside files with file: as local dependency.
"dependencies": {
"#my-project/outside-dist": "file:./../../../../dist".
}
then
import {FooComponent} from "#my-project/outside-dist/components";
No eject or react-app-rewired or other 3rd-party solution was needed.
You need to move WC-BlackonWhite.jpg into your src directory. The public directory is for static files that's going to be linked directly in the HTML (such as the favicon), not stuff that you're going to import directly into your bundle.
install these two packages
npm i --save-dev react-app-rewired customize-cra
package.json
"scripts": {
- "start": "react-scripts start"
+ "start": "react-app-rewired start"
},
config-overrides.js
const { removeModuleScopePlugin } = require('customize-cra');
module.exports = function override(config, env) {
if (!config.plugins) {
config.plugins = [];
}
removeModuleScopePlugin()(config);
return config;
};
I think Lukas Bach solution to use react-app-rewired in order to modify webpack config is a good way to go, however, I wouldn't exclude the whole ModuleScopePlugin but instead whitelist the specific file that can be imported outside of src:
config-overrides.js
const ModuleScopePlugin = require("react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin");
const path = require("path");
module.exports = function override(config) {
config.resolve.plugins.forEach(plugin => {
if (plugin instanceof ModuleScopePlugin) {
plugin.allowedFiles.add(path.resolve("./config.json"));
}
});
return config;
};
Copy-Paste Typescript solution
(e.g. this will work for a CRA/TS stack, which requires an additional step compared to CRA/JS. The solution itself is not typed.)
Adds the required paths to the ModuleScopePlugin instead of bluntly removing the plugin.
This code below is using craco, but should be easily usable for react-app-rewired or similar solutions. You just need to find the spot where you have a webpackConfig object (react-app-rewired: module.exports.webpack inside your config-overrides.js), and pass it to the provided functions.
craco.config.js
const path = require("path");
const enableImportsFromExternalPaths = require("./src/helpers/craco/enableImportsFromExternalPaths");
// Paths to the code you want to use
const sharedLibOne = path.resolve(__dirname, "../shared-lib-1/src");
const sharedLibTwo = path.resolve(__dirname, "../shared-lib-2/src");
module.exports = {
plugins: [
{
plugin: {
overrideWebpackConfig: ({ webpackConfig }) => {
enableImportsFromExternalPaths(webpackConfig, [
// Add the paths here
sharedLibOne,
sharedLibTwo,
]);
return webpackConfig;
},
},
},
],
};
helpers/craco/enableImportsFromExternalPaths.js
const findWebpackPlugin = (webpackConfig, pluginName) =>
webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.find(
({ constructor }) => constructor && constructor.name === pluginName
);
const enableTypescriptImportsFromExternalPaths = (
webpackConfig,
newIncludePaths
) => {
const oneOfRule = webpackConfig.module.rules.find((rule) => rule.oneOf);
if (oneOfRule) {
const tsxRule = oneOfRule.oneOf.find(
(rule) => rule.test && rule.test.toString().includes("tsx")
);
if (tsxRule) {
tsxRule.include = Array.isArray(tsxRule.include)
? [...tsxRule.include, ...newIncludePaths]
: [tsxRule.include, ...newIncludePaths];
}
}
};
const addPathsToModuleScopePlugin = (webpackConfig, paths) => {
const moduleScopePlugin = findWebpackPlugin(
webpackConfig,
"ModuleScopePlugin"
);
if (!moduleScopePlugin) {
throw new Error(
`Expected to find plugin "ModuleScopePlugin", but didn't.`
);
}
moduleScopePlugin.appSrcs = [...moduleScopePlugin.appSrcs, ...paths];
};
const enableImportsFromExternalPaths = (webpackConfig, paths) => {
enableTypescriptImportsFromExternalPaths(webpackConfig, paths);
addPathsToModuleScopePlugin(webpackConfig, paths);
};
module.exports = enableImportsFromExternalPaths;
Taken from here and here 🙏
Image inside public folder
use image inside html extension
<img src="%PUBLIC_URL%/resumepic.png"/>
use image inside js extension
<img src={process.env.PUBLIC_URL+"/resumepic.png"}/>
use image inside js Extension
This restriction makes sure all files or modules (exports) are inside src/ directory, the implementation is in ./node_modules/react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin.js, in following lines of code.
// Resolve the issuer from our appSrc and make sure it's one of our files
// Maybe an indexOf === 0 would be better?
const relative = path.relative(appSrc, request.context.issuer);
// If it's not in src/ or a subdirectory, not our request!
if (relative.startsWith('../') || relative.startsWith('..\\')) {
return callback();
}
You can remove this restriction by
either changing this piece of code (not recommended)
or do eject then remove ModuleScopePlugin.js from the directory.
or comment/remove const ModuleScopePlugin = require('react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin'); from ./node_modules/react-scripts/config/webpack.config.dev.js
PS: beware of the consequences of eject.
Adding to Bartek Maciejiczek's answer, this is how it looks with Craco:
const ModuleScopePlugin = require("react-dev-utils/ModuleScopePlugin");
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
webpack: {
configure: webpackConfig => {
webpackConfig.resolve.plugins.forEach(plugin => {
if (plugin instanceof ModuleScopePlugin) {
plugin.allowedFiles.add(path.resolve("./config.json"));
}
});
return webpackConfig;
}
}
};
My previous workaround worked with Webpack 4, but not with 5. After skimming through the accumulated workarounds since then, I found the following one really easy (and seemingly scalable).
import { CracoAliasPlugin } from 'react-app-alias';
const cracoConfig = {
plugins: [
{
plugin: CracoAliasPlugin,
options: {
alias: { '~': './' },
},
},
],
}
Then import like so:
import whatever from '~/<path-to-file>';
I have had to overcome this same issue in Truffle. The solution was as follows:
ince Create-React-App's default behavior disallows importing files from outside of the src folder, we need to bring the contracts in our build folder inside src. We can copy and paste them every time we compile our contracts, but a better way is to simply configure Truffle to put the files there.
In the truffle-config.js file, replace the contents with the following:
const path = require("path");
module.exports = {
contracts_build_directory: path.join(__dirname, "client/src/contracts")
};
I don't know if this helps you, but I know I found your question when I had the same issue in Truffle, and this might help someone else.
This can be done directly without using the path to the public folder.
You can do it like
<img src="/images/image-name" alt=""/>
This happens because we do not use App.js in the browser. Since index.html is executed in the browser itself and the path to images is already in the public folder containing index.html file
You don't need to eject, you can modify the react-scripts config with the rescripts library
This would work then:
module.exports = config => {
const scopePluginIndex = config.resolve.plugins.findIndex(
({ constructor }) => constructor && constructor.name === "ModuleScopePlugin"
);
config.resolve.plugins.splice(scopePluginIndex, 1);
return config;
};
Came to the same issue in my project, and found this in the official create-react-app docs: https://create-react-app.dev/docs/using-the-public-folder/
There is an "escape hatch" to add an asset outside the module system:
If you put a file into the public folder, it will not be processed by
webpack. Instead it will be copied into the build folder untouched. To
reference assets in the public folder, you need to use an environment
variable called PUBLIC_URL.
Here's an example they provide:
render() {
// Note: this is an escape hatch and should be used sparingly!
// Normally we recommend using `import` for getting asset URLs
// as described in “Adding Images and Fonts” above this section.
return <img src={process.env.PUBLIC_URL + '/img/logo.png'} />;
}
This worked for me without installing/ changing anything
Context: I got this error when I tried to generate a build using yarn run build
Things I have done between the working and failing of yarn run build
I updated my ant-design to the latest stable version (v4.23.5).
Note: I highly believe that there is nothing to do with this version. I am just mentioning it to add more details.
This answer solved my issue. But I have changed no imports that access something outside the src directory.
The changes include updated package.json, yarn.lock, new Antd implementations (change in props mainly).
It made no sense why the build command broke/ why the answer is working.
Solution here
As all the changes are related to package.json, yarn.lock. I deleted node_modules and clean installed all the packages.
Run
yarn
or
npm install
If you only need to import a single file, such as README.md or package.json, then this can be explicitly added to ModuleScopePlugin()
config/paths.js
const resolveApp = relativePath => path.resolve(appDirectory, relativePath);
module.exports = {
appPackageJson: resolveApp('package.json'),
appReadmeMD: resolveApp('README.md'),
};
config/webpack.config.dev.js + config/webpack.config.prod.js
module.exports = {
resolve: {
plugins: [
// Prevents users from importing files from outside of src/ (or node_modules/).
// This often causes confusion because we only process files within src/ with babel.
// To fix this, we prevent you from importing files out of src/ -- if you'd like to,
// please link the files into your node_modules/ and let module-resolution kick in.
// Make sure your source files are compiled, as they will not be processed in any way.
new ModuleScopePlugin(paths.appSrc, [
paths.appPackageJson,
paths.appReadmeMD // README.md lives outside of ./src/ so needs to be explicitly included in ModuleScopePlugin()
]),
]
}
}
the best solution is to fork react-scripts, this is actually mentioned in the official documentation, see: Alternatives to Ejecting
If you need multiple modifications, like when using ant design, you can combine multiple functions like this:
const {
override,
removeModuleScopePlugin,
fixBabelImports,
} = require('customize-cra');
module.exports = override(
fixBabelImports('import', {
libraryName: 'antd',
libraryDirectory: 'es',
style: 'css',
}),
removeModuleScopePlugin(),
);
You can try using simlinks, but in reverse.
React won't follow simlinks, but you can move something to the source directory, and create a simlink to it.
In the root of my project, I had a node server directory that had several schema files in it. I wanted to use them on the frontend, so I:
moved the files /src
in the termal, I cd'ed into where the schema files belonged in server
ln -s SRC_PATH_OF_SCHEMA_FILE
This gave react what it was looking for, and node was perfectly happy including files through simlinks.
If you want to access CSS files from the public, you might face an error OUTSIDE OF SOURCE DIRECTORY
Alternatively, you can link this file in index.html which also resides in the public directory.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="App.css">
Here's an alternative that works well in simple cases (using fs and ncp). While developing, keep a script running that watches for changes to your shared folder(s) outside of /src. When changes are made, the script can automatically copy the shared folder(s) to your project. Here's an example that watches a single directory recursively:
// This should be run from the root of your project
const fs = require('fs')
const ncp = require('ncp').ncp;
ncp.limit = 16
// Watch for file changes to your shared directory outside of /src
fs.watch('../shared', { recursive: true }, (eventType, filename) => {
console.log(`${eventType}: ${filename}`)
// Copy the shared folder straight to your project /src
// You could be smarter here and only copy the changed file
ncp('../shared', './src/shared', function(err) {
if (err) {
return console.error(err);
}
console.log('finished syncing!');
});
})
This is an issue with the relative import, which might have caused because we've used "create-react-app project" command which forms a directory named project with node_modules folder and several other files in public and src folders inside it.
The create-react-app command puts a limitation that we can't import anything from outside src.
My Problem:
I had to import react-bootstrap css files which are created in node_modules folder outside the src folder.
I used import "../node_modules/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css"; but I got the error on terminal.
I found out that I can create a new react app and follow solution steps from A to G, in order to fix this issue.
Solution:
A) Create a new react app, using create-react-app new
B) cd new
C) run this command: "npm install react-bootstrap bootstrap#4.6.0" (without the "" double quotes )
D) in your react file put this to import bootstrap:
D.1) import "../node_modules/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.min.css";
or
D.2)import Button from "react-bootstrap/Button";
E) create a bootstrap element like a Button or anything in your react file, for D.1) < button className="btn btn-success" > Bootstrap < /button>
or
for D.2) < Button variant="primary"> Bootstrap < /Button>
F) in terminal: cd src
G) in terminal: npm start,
this time it will be compiled successfully.
Reasoning:
I could see react-bootstrap working finally once I followed steps A to G in order, and this time I didn't get any error.
(I thought of this solution because:
I've used npm install "#material-ui/icons" and that got installed in the node_modules folder outside the src.
In my react file I've used import Add from "#material-ui/icons/Add"
and Material-ui icons were working fine for me,
but here also we are importing from outside src, from node_modules.. and everything works fine. Why there is no error of importing from outside src this time)
That's why I just created a new react app, and followed solution steps A to G.
If you want to set a background image using CSS. So you have to set the image using the URL of your's localhost and add the path of your image. Just see the example below.
.banner {
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
background-image: url("http://localhost:3000/img/bg.jpg");
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
Posting here what #Flaom wrote as a comment in the marked as reply answer and that actually saves lives:
"How is this the accepted answer? This bogus restriction is trivially eliminated by simply setting NODE_PATH=./src/.. in the .env file. By doing so, you can import from outside of the src folder without going through the pain associated with ejecting your app. "
Flaom
EDIT Added some more info as #cigien requested.
All the answers above describe very well why we cannot use an image from the public folder when we create our react app with the create-react-app. Having the issue myself and reading all these answers I realized that, what the answers say is to "hack" the app in order to remove the module that restricts us. Some of the answers don't even have an undo option. For a "training" application that is ok.
Personally I would not want to add a solution that alters the concept of the app to my own project, specially in a commercial one. #Flaom solution is the simplest and if anything change in the future it can be replaced with another solution. It has no risk, it can be removed anytime and is the simplest.
This was my code:
import React from 'react';
import './Navbar.scss';
import {images} from '../../constants';
const Navbar = () => {
return (
<nav>
<div>
< img src = {images.logo} alt = "logo" />
</div>
</nav>
);
}
export default Navbar;
Changed it too:
import React from 'react';
import './Navbar.scss';
import {images} from '././constants';
const Navbar = () => {
return (
<nav>
<div>
< img src = {images.logo} alt = "logo" />
</div>
</nav>
);
}
export default Navbar;
And it worked! Im getting better at fixing bugs haha.
If you file reside in public folder and if you want to import it without eject or without using react-app-rewired then in that case you can access file via domains name and the path of the file and using axios.
Example: There is a font file called favico.ico located inside public folder. You want to import it in one the file located in src. You
can access the font using following logic.
axios.get('example.com/favico.ico').then(() => {
// here you can access this file.
})
In above example example.com is domain. If you have different environment like localhost, staging, production then in that case the domain name is different.
So, to get the favico.ico you can use following logic.
axios.get(`${window.location.origin}/favico.ico`).then(() => {
// here you can access this file.
})
In above example you window.location.origin give you current domain meaning if you run your code locally then, it will give you http://localhost:{portnumber},
If your code run on production and production domain is example.com then, it will give you "example.com". So using this pattern you can access assets located in public folder.
Related
In Node.js, is there any way to require file from the same package without using relative paths? For example, here's a snippet of code from ESLint.
const rule = require("../../../lib/rules/accessor-pairs"),
{ RuleTester } = require("../../../lib/rule-tester");
The fact that we have to walk all the way up the tree ../../../ to get to the root is not only annoying. It's also brittle, because I can't move the code without updating all of dependency references.
Yet somehow Node.js developers seem to have lived with it the past 10 years. I can't find anything in the docs or Stack Overflow that solves this problem other than a third-party dependency called require-self. Nor have I been able to find a definitive statement that using relative paths is the only non-hacky way for a file to require another file in the same module.
If there's a way to specify a path relative to the package root in ECMAScript Modules (ESM) but not CommonJS (CJS), or vice versa, I would like to know that as well.
To be clear, I don't think there is a solution to the problem. If there is great. Otherwise, I'm looking for confirmation with an authoritative reference.
Not necessarily the same package - if you are writing libraries this won't be useful, but if you are writing the "final application" - the thing that actually gets run:
One option:
If the NODE_PATH environment variable is set to a colon-delimited list of absolute paths, then Node.js will search those paths for modules if they are not found elsewhere.
So you can do any of:
1.
export NODE_PATH=.
node app.js
NODE_PATH=. node app.js
// app.js (or whatever your entry point is) before *any* require() calls
process.env.NODE_PATH = __dirname;
require('module').Module._initPaths();
Or, another way:
The Module object representing the entry script loaded when the Node.js process launched.
https://nodejs.org/api/modules.html#modules_require_main
So you can just do:
const rule = require.main.require("./lib/rules/accessor-pairs")
anytime you want it to be relative to the root (assuming that is how you have your project structured).
You can use the package name itself as a "symlink" to the package root.
Example - foo package imports bar script relative to the foo package root.
package.json
{
"dependencies": {
"foo": "file:./foo"
}
}
index.js
const foo = require('foo');
console.log(foo.bar); // prints "hello"
foo/index.js
const bar = require('foo/bar'); // import relative to the package root
module.exports = {
bar: bar
}
foo/bar.js
module.exports = 'hello';
If you use vscode then you're in luck - !!!! jsconfig.json in project root handles this masterfully for commonjs, es6, amd, umd, etc
The jsconfig.json file specifies the root files and the options for the features provided by the JavaScript language service.
jsconfig.json
{
"compilerOptions": {
"module": "commonjs",
"baseUrl": ".",
"paths": {
"#rules/*": ["path/to/lib/rules/"]
}
}
}
and then to use the alias:
const rule = require('#rules/accessor-pairs'),
{ RuleTester } = require('#rules/rule-tester');
Read more:
https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/jsconfig
A user tries to use my package for nuxt.js, but gets the error: document is not defined.
I found the first issue. When I build the bundle with "build-bundle": "vue-cli-service build --target lib --name index ./src/index.js",
vue-style-loader is being used. This, however, results in the error for using nuxt projects. This part is failing:
function addStyle (obj /* StyleObjectPart */) {
var update, remove
var styleElement = document.querySelector('style[' + ssrIdKey + '~="' + obj.id + '"]')
Document is not defined since we are using server rendering. But the question is how can I build up my package so that I can use it with nuxt?
I need:
index.common.js
index.umd.js
index.umd.min.js
This is due to the server-side rendering. If you need to specify that you want to import a resource only on the client-side, you need to use the process.client variable.
For example, in your .vue file:
if (process.client) {
require('external_library')
// do something
}
The above is the fundamental solution to document is not defined.
I checked some information and found that, this problem is not caused by your package. In fact, the problem lies on the cache-loader package in the user’s nuxt project.
For some reason cache-loader incorrectly determined the current environment as browser and not node so that vue-style-loader is confused and used client implementation instead.
So try to let users add the following configuration to the nuxt.config.js file to disable stylesheet caches on server-side:
build: {
...
cache: true,
extend(config, { isServer, isDev, isClient }) {
...
if (isServer) {
for (const rules of config.module.rules.filter(({ test }) =>
/\.((c|le|sa|sc)ss|styl.*)/.test(test.toString())
)) {
for (const rule of rules.oneOf || []) {
rule.use = rule.use.filter(
({ loader }) => loader !== 'cache-loader'
)
}
}
}
...
}
...
}
I found a solution but it is not using the vue-cli service. Instead, the files are compiled by rollup. I found using the cli service much easier. The only problem with the cli service is it will adjust the "flow" of your repo. However, you can modify the rollup.config.js to amend the folder structure.
The problem with rollup is that it isn't webpack. Therefore, all components using a webpack configuration need to be adjusted or rollup.config.js needs to be amended to include the additional functionality
Here is my code for a tooltip that toggles the CSS property display: block on MouseOver and on Mouse Out display: none.
it('should show and hide the message using onMouseOver and onMouseOut events respectively', () => {
const { queryByTestId, queryByText } = render(
<Tooltip id="test" message="test" />,
)
fireEvent.mouseOver(queryByTestId('tooltip'))
expect(queryByText('test')).toBeInTheDocument()
fireEvent.mouseOut(queryByTestId('tooltip'))
expect(queryByText('test')).not.toBeInTheDocument()
cleanup()
})
I keep getting the error TypeError: expect(...).toBeInTheDocument is not a function
Has anyone got any ideas why this is happening? My other tests to render and snapshot the component all work as expected. As do the queryByText and queryByTestId.
toBeInTheDocument is not part of RTL. You need to install jest-dom to enable it.
And then import it in your test files by:
import '#testing-library/jest-dom'
As mentioned by Giorgio, you need to install jest-dom. Here is what worked for me:
(I was using typescript)
npm i --save-dev #testing-library/jest-dom
Then add an import to your setupTests.ts
import '#testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect';
Then in your jest.config.js you can load it via:
"setupFilesAfterEnv": [
"<rootDir>/src/setupTests.ts"
]
When you do npm i #testing-library/react make sure there is a setupTests.js file with the following statement in it
import '#testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect';
Having tried all of the advice in this post and it still not working for me, I'd like to offer an alternative solution:
Install jest-dom:
npm i --save-dev #testing-library/jest-dom
Then create a setupTests.js file in the src directory (this bit is important! I had it in the root dir and this did not work...). In here, put:
import '#testing-library/jest-dom'
(or require(...) if that's your preference).
This worked for me :)
Some of the accepted answers were basically right but some may be slightly outdated:
Some references that are good for now:
https://github.com/testing-library/jest-dom
https://jestjs.io/docs/configuration
Here are the full things you need:
in the project's <rootDir> (aka where package.json and jest.config.js are), make sure you have a file called jest.config.js so that Jest can automatically pick it up for configuration. The file is in JS but is structured similarly to a package.json.
Make sure you input the following:
module.exports = {
testPathIgnorePatterns: ['<rootDir>/node_modules', '<rootDir>/dist'], // might want?
moduleNameMapper: {
'#components(.*)': '<rootDir>/src/components$1' // might want?
},
moduleDirectories: ['<rootDir>/node_modules', '<rootDir>/src'],
setupFilesAfterEnv: ['<rootDir>/src/jest-setup.ts'] // this is the KEY
// note it should be in the top level of the exported object.
};
Also, note that if you're using typescript you will need to make sure your jest-setup.ts file is compiled (so add it to src or to the list of items to compile in your tsconfig.json.
At the top of jest-setup.ts/js (or whatever you want to name this entrypoint) file: add import '#testing-library/jest-dom';.
You may also want to make sure it actually runs so put a console.log('hello, world!');. You also have the opportunity to add any global functions you'd like to have available in jest such as (global.fetch = jest.fn()).
Now you actually have to install #testing-library/jest-dom: npm i -D #testing-library/jest-dom in the console.
With those steps you should be ready to use jest-dom:
Without TS: you still need:
npm i -D #testing-library/jest-dom
Creating a jest.config.js and adding to it a minimum of: module.exports = { setupFilesAfterEnv: ['<rootDir>/[path-to-file]/jest-setup.js'] }.
Creating a [path-to-file]/jest-setup.js and adding to it: import '#testing-library/jest-dom';.
The jest-setup file is also a great place to configure tests like creating a special renderWithProvider( function or setting up global window functions.
None of the answers worked for me because I made the silly mistake of typing toBeInDocument() instead of toBeInTheDocument(). Maybe someone else did the same mistake :)
I had a hard time solving that problem so I believe it's important to note the followings if you're using CREATE REACT APP for your project:
You DO NOT need a jest.config.js file to solve this, so if you have that you can delete it.
You DO NOT need to change anything in package.json.
You HAVE TO name your jest setup file setupTests.js and have it under the src folder. It WILL NOT work if your setup file is called jest.setup.js or jest-setup.js.
install required packages
npm install --save-dev #testing-library/jest-dom eslint-plugin-jest-dom
create jest-setup.js in the root folder of your project and add
import '#testing-library/jest-dom'
in jest.config.js
setupFilesAfterEnv: ['<rootDir>/jest-setup.js']
TypeScript only, add the following to the tsconfig.json file. Also, change .js extension to .ts.
"include": ["./jest-setup.ts"]
toBeInTheDocument() and many similar functions are not part of the React-testing-library. It requires installing an additional package.
For anyone out there that like is trying to run tests in Typescript with jest and is still getting the same error even after installing #testing-library/jest-dom and following all the other answers: you probably need to install the type definitions for jest-dom (here) with:
npm i #types/testing-library__jest-dom
or
yarn add #types/testing-library__jest-dom
You need to install them as real dependencies and not as devDependency.
I was having this issue but for #testing-library/jasmine-dom rather than #testing-library/jest-dom.
The process of setup is just a tiny bit different with jasmine. You need to set up the environment in a before function in order for the matchers to be added. I think jest-dom will go ahead and add the matchers when you first import but Jasmine does not.
import { render, screen } from '#testing-library/react';
import MyComponent from './myComponent';
import JasmineDOM from '#testing-library/jasmine-dom';
describe("My Suite", function () {
beforeAll(() => {
jasmine.getEnv().addMatchers(JasmineDOM);
})
it('render my stuff', () => {
const { getByText } = render(<MyComponent />);
const ele = screen.getByText(/something/i);
expect(ele).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
If you are using react-script then follow the below steps
Install #testing-library/jest-dom library if not done already using
npm i #testing-library/jest-dom.
Put import "#testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect" in setUpTest.js
If you are using jest then import the library in jest.setup.js file.
the problem already was solved, but i will comment a little tip here, you don't need to create a single file called setup just for this, you just need to specify the module of the jest-dom on the setupFilesAfterEnv option in your jest configuration file.
Like this:
setupFilesAfterEnv: ['#testing-library/jest-dom/extend-expect'],
If you're using TS
You could also add a test.d.ts file to your test directory and use a triple slash directive:
///<reference types='#testing-library/jest-dom'>
Instead of doing:
expect(queryByText('test')).toBeInTheDocument()
you can find and test that it is in the document with just one line by using
let element = getByText('test');
The test will fail if the element isn't found with the getBy call.
I'm in the process of building an npm package which will be installed globally. Is it possible to have non-code files installed alongside code files that can be referenced from code files?
For example, if my package includes someTextFile.txt and a module.js file (and my package.json includes "bin": {"someCommand":"./module.js"}) can I read the contents of someTextFile.txt into memory in module.js? How would I do that?
The following is an example of a module that loads the contents of a file (string) into the global scope.
core.js : the main module file (entry point of package.json)
//:Understanding: module.exports
module.exports = {
reload:(cb)=>{ console.log("[>] Magick reloading to memory"); ReadSpellBook(cb)}
}
//:Understanding: global object
//the following function is only accesible by the magick module
const ReadSpellBook=(cb)=>{
require('fs').readFile(__dirname+"/spellBook.txt","utf8",(e,theSpells)=>{
if(e){ console.log("[!] The Spell Book is MISSING!\n"); cb(e)}
else{
console.log("[*] Reading Spell Book")
//since we want to make the contents of .txt accesible :
global.SpellBook = theSpells // global.SpellBook is now shared accross all the code (global scope)
cb()//callBack
}
})
}
//·: Initialize :.
console.log("[+] Time for some Magick!")
ReadSpellBook((e)=>e?console.log(e):console.log(SpellBook))
spellBook.txt
ᚠ ᚡ ᚢ ᚣ ᚤ ᚥ ᚦ ᚧ ᚨ ᚩ ᚪ ᚫ ᚬ ᚭ ᚮ ᚯ
ᚰ ᚱ ᚲ ᚳ ᚴ ᚵ ᚶ ᚷ ᚸ ᚹ ᚺ ᚻ ᚼ ᚽ ᚾ ᚿ
ᛀ ᛁ ᛂ ᛃ ᛄ ᛅ ᛆ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛋ ᛌ ᛍ ᛎ ᛏ
ᛐ ᛑ ᛒ ᛓ ᛔ ᛕ ᛖ ᛗ ᛘ ᛙ ᛚ ᛛ ᛜ ᛝ ᛞ ᛟ
ᛠ ᛡ ᛢ ᛣ ᛤ ᛥ ᛦ ᛧ ᛨ ᛩ ᛪ ᛫ ᛬ ᛭ ᛮ ᛯ
If you require it from another piece of code, you will see how it prints to the console and initializes by itself.
If you want to achieve a manual initalization, simply remove the 3 last lines (·: Initialize :.) and use reload() :
const magick = require("core.js")
magick.reload((error)=>{ if(error){throw error}else{
//now you know the SpellBook is loaded
console.log(SpellBook.length)
})
I have built some CLIs which were distributed privately, so I believe I can illuminate a bit here.
Let's say your global modules are installed at a directory called $PATH. When your package will be installed on any machine, it will essentially be extracted at that directory.
When you'll fire up someCommand from any terminal, the module.js will be invoked which was kept at $PATH. If you initially kept the template file in the same directory as your package, then it will be present at that location which is local to module.js.
Assuming you edit the template as a string and then want to write it locally to where the user wished / pwd, you just have to use process.cwd() to get the path to that directory. This totally depends on how you code it out.
In case you want to explicitly include the files only in the npm package, then use files attribute of package.json.
As to particularly answer "how can my code file in the npm package locate the path to the globally installed npm folder in which it is located in a way that is guaranteed to work across OSes and is future proof?", that is very very different from the template thingy you were trying to achieve. Anyway, what you're simply asking here is the global path of npm modules. As a fail safe option, use the path returned by require.main.filename within your code to keep that as a reference.
When you npm publish, it packages everything in the folder, excluding things noted in .npmignore. (If you don't have an .npmignore file, it'll dig into .gitignore. See https://docs.npmjs.com/misc/developers#keeping-files-out-of-your-package) So in short, yes, you can package the text file into your module. Installing the module (locally or globally) will get the text file into place in a way you expect.
How do you find the text file once it's installed? __dirname gives you the path of the current file ... if you ask early enough. See https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/globals.html#globals_dirname (If you use __dirname inside a closure, it may be the path of the enclosing function.) For the near-term of "future", this doesn't look like it'll change, and will work as expected in all conditions -- whether the module is installed locally or globally, and whether others depend on the module or it's a direct install.
So let's assume the text file is in the same directory as the currently running script:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var dir = __dirname;
function runIt(cb) {
var fullPath = path.combine(__dirname, 'myfile.txt');
fs.readFile(fullPath, 'utf8' , function (e,content) {
if (e) {
return cb(e);
}
// content now has the contents of the file
cb(content);
}
}
module.exports = runIt;
Sweet!
I'm trying to figure out how to perform dynamic import of classes in ES6 one the server side (node.js with Babel).
I would like to have some functionalities similar to what reflection offers in Java. The idea is to import all the classes in a specific folder and instanciate them dynamically.
So for example I could have multiple classes declared in a folder like the one below :
export default class MyClass {
constructor(somevar) {
this._somevar = somevar
}
//...
//some more instance level functions here
}
and then somewhere else in my app's code I could have a function that finds out all the classes in a specific folder and tries to instanciate them :
//somewhere else in my app
instanciationFunction(){
//find all the classes in a specific folder
var classFiles = glob.sync(p + '/path_to_classes/**/*.js', {
nodir: true
});
_.each(classFiles, async function (file) {
console.log(file);
var TheClass = import(file);
var instance = new TheClass();
//and then do whatever I want with that new instance
});
}
I've tried doing it with require but I get errors. Apparently the constructor cant be found.
Any idea would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
ES module definitions are declarative, and the current direction tools are taking is the path where dependencies are determined during parse (via static analysis), waaay before any of the code is executed. This means dynamic and conditional imports go against the said path. It's not like in Node where imports are determined on execution, upon executing require.
If you want dynamic, runtime imports, consider taking a look at SystemJS. If you're familiar with RequireJS, it takes the same concept, but expands it to multiple module formats, including ES6. It has SystemJS.import which appears to do what you want, plus handles the path resolution that you're currently doing.
Alternatively, if your intention is to shed off excess code, consider using Rollup. It will analyze code for you and only include code that's actually used. That way, you don't need to manually do conditional loading.
You need to preprocess with babel, because they are not yet a part of node (for that matter, neither are static imports - node uses require).
https://github.com/airbnb/babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node
steps:
pre
npm i -D babel-cli or npm i -D babel
1
npm i -D babel-plugin-dynamic-import-node
2
.babelrc
{
"plugins": ["dynamic-import-node"]
}
ready, go!
babel-node test_import.js for babel-cli, or for raw babel:
a
(edit) package.json
"scripts": {
"pretest": "babel test_imports.js -o dist/test_imports.js",
"test": "node dist/test_imports.js"
//...
b
node test
I had the same usecase and i managed to dynamically load and instantiate default exported classes using:
const c = import("theClass.js")
const i = new c.default();
using node v16.4.0