The guys from guide4you did a great job making this lib opensource!!
I've succeeded in having a working demo guide4you sample.
How adjustable is the lib?
For instance how can I add layers with GeoJSON instead of KML.
Can the layers be added dynamically (with own javascript) instead of predefined?
Take this as example: https://openlayers.org/en/latest/examples/geojson.html
To be more specific: how can that example work together with guide4you ?
Kind regards,
Sam
To use a GeoJSON layer in guide4you you can just specify the type "GeoJSON" in the layerconfig.
{
"id": "3",
"type": "GeoJSON",
"source": {
"url": "path/to/geojson"
}
}
See also https://github.com/KlausBenndorf/guide4you/blob/master/conf/full/layers.commented.json for some examples
If you like to add a layer on the fly with javascript you can use this api function:
map.get('api').addFeatureLayer({
"id": "3",
"type": "GeoJSON",
"source": {
"url": "path/to/geojson"
},
"visible": true
})
the possible options are the same as in the layer config.
If you like to add only new features you can create a layer with type "Intern" and add the features with openlayers functionalities. The source of a feature layer is a subclass of ol.source.Vector.
In the example below I am assuming that geojsonObject is of the same kind as in the geojson example of openlayers.
var layer = map.get('api').addFeatureLayer({
"id": "3",
"type": "Intern",
"source": {
"features": []
},
"visible": true
});
layer.getSource().addFeatures((new ol.format.GeoJSON()).readFeatures(geojsonObject));
And last but not least you can use a simplified api to define features inside a layerConfig object like this:
{
"id": "3",
"type": "Intern",
"source": {
"features": [{
"id": 6,
"name": "Some feature",
"description: "Some description",
"style": "#defaultStyle",
"geometryWKT": "... any wkt string here ..."
},{
"geometryWKT": "... any wkt string here ..."
}]
}
}
this can be used either in a layerConfig file or in the addFeatureLayer api method.
Related
I am attempting to create a JSON Object from an array to pass into a Microsoft product. The format in which the JSON object is accepted is shown beneath (content-type: "application/json"):
{
"value": [
{
"activityGroupNames": [],
"confidence": 0,
"description": "This is a canary indicator for demo purpose. Take no action on any observables set in this indicator.",
"expirationDateTime": "2019-03-01T21:44:03.1668987+00:00",
"externalId": "Test--8586509942423126760MS164-0",
"fileHashType": "sha256",
"fileHashValue": "b555c45c5b1b01304217e72118d6ca1b14b7013644a078273cea27bbdc1cf9d6",
"killChain": [],
"malwareFamilyNames": [],
"severity": 0,
"tags": [],
"targetProduct": "Azure Sentinel",
"threatType": "WatchList",
"tlpLevel": "green",
},
{
"activityGroupNames": [],
"confidence": 0,
"description": "This is a canary indicator for demo purpose. Take no action on any observables set in this indicator.",
"expirationDateTime": "2019-03-01T21:44:03.1748779+00:00",
"externalId": "Test--8586509942423126760MS164-1",
"fileHashType": "sha256",
"fileHashValue": "1796b433950990b28d6a22456c9d2b58ced1bdfcdf5f16f7e39d6b9bdca4213b",
"killChain": [],
"malwareFamilyNames": [],
"severity": 0,
"tags": [],
"targetProduct": "Azure Sentinel",
"threatType": "WatchList",
"tlpLevel": "green",
}
]
}
I making use of an inline code script in Microsoft automate that performs the following in JavaScript:
var threat = workflowContext.actions.Compose.outputs;
var value = Object.values(threat);
return value;
The workflowContext.actions.Compose.outputs line pulls an array consisting of objects shown in the following snippet:
[{"id": "1", "activityGroupNames": "test2"}, {"id": "2", "activityGroupNames": "test3"}, {"id": "3", "activityGroupNames": "test4"}]
This is my output:
{
"body": [
{
"id": "1",
"action": "alert",
"activityGroupNames": "test2"
},
{
"id": "2",
"action": "alert",
"activityGroupNames": "test3"
},
{
"id": "3",
"action": "alert",
"activityGroupNames": "test2"
}
]
}
it is pretty much identical to the format described my Microsoft shown in the first snippet. (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/tiindicator-submittiindicators?view=graph-rest-beta&tabs=http) at the bottom.
I am unsure as to how I can change the key name from "body" to "value" and think maybe this will resolve my issue. Either way, I'd appreciate any other help on the matter, if any more context is required, please ask.
EDIT: The image beneath shows that the returned return value; is in fact being used as the input for a POST request to the Microsoft graph API
I receive with my ajax post request a message with values to display. This json response message looks like this:
{
"line": {
"name": "Google item",
"images": {
"element": {
"order": "1",
"link": "https://google.com/1.jpg",
"name": "1.jpg"
},
"element": {
"order": "2",
"link": "https://google.com/2.jpg",
"name": "2.jpg"
},
"element": {
"order": "3",
"link": "https://google.com/3.jpg",
"name": "3.jpg"
},
"element": {
"order": "4",
"link": "https://google.com/4.jpg",
"name": "4.jpg"
},
"element": {
"order": "5",
"link": "https://google.com/5.jpg",
"name": "5.jpg"
}
},
"features": {
"element": {
"name": "1",
"order": "1"
},
"element": {
"name": "2",
"order": "2"
},
"element": {
"name": "3",
"order": "3"
},
"element": {
"name": "4",
"order": "4"
}
},
"purchasing_price": "10",
"selling_price": "20",
"ftp_path": "google/item",
"description": ""
}
}
I'm in development and have not so much experience with json in jquery/ajax.
I tried this:
function parseContent(content){
$("#name").val(content.line.name);
$("#ftp_path").val(content.line.ftp_path);
$("#html_description").val(content.line.description);
$("#feature").remove();
$.each(content.line.features, function(k, v){
$("#features").append('<input type="text" class="form-control mt-3" id="feature" value="' + v.name + '" required>');
alert(v.name );
});
}
My problem is, the variable content contains just the last image und feature element. But in chrome/network I could see, the complete message has been received.
So I found out there is a parsing issue: Parsed JSON contains only the last element.
But how can I fix this in my case, to iterate through all elements?
The JSON specification says:
The names within an object SHOULD be unique.
The names in those objects are not.
SHOULD means:
that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a
particular item, but the full implications must be understood and
carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
The implications here are that every JSON parser (that I'm aware of at least) will ignore all but one of the values with duplicate names in an object.
If you really need to deal with that data then you are going to have to either track down a parser which can handle it (I'm not aware of any) or write a custom JSON parser which can (you'll also need to decide what data structure you want to generate from it because JS can't have duplicate property names in objects either). There are a number of JSON parsers on npm you might want to examine the source code of as a starting point.
A better solution would be to change whatever is generating the source data to produce a sensible format that doesn't violate a SHOULD requirement. Replacing the duplicate property names with an array for example.
Question:
Is there a plain or native javascript way to validate a JSON script against a JSON schema?
I have found lots of libraries on Github, but no native/plain solution. Does EcmaScript not have a specification for this? and do none of the browsers (or nodejs) have a way to validate JSON natively?
Context of Question:
I have a very complex schema that I developed.
It is supposed to work along with a script that requires that the JSON data passed into it to comply with the schema.
Simply, no.
There was something called JSON Schema, which was an Internet Draft which expired in 2013. Internet Drafts are the first stage to producing an Internet Standard. See more about it at the official site, as it seems to potentially still be actively developed, although it is not (to my knowledge) in widespread use.
An example of the schema:
{
"$schema": "http://json-schema.org/schema#",
"title": "Product",
"type": "object",
"required": ["id", "name", "price"],
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "number",
"description": "Product identifier"
},
"name": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Name of the product"
},
"price": {
"type": "number",
"minimum": 0
},
"tags": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "string"
}
},
"stock": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"warehouse": {
"type": "number"
},
"retail": {
"type": "number"
}
}
}
}
}
will validate this example JSON:
{
"id": 1,
"name": "Foo",
"price": 123,
"tags": [
"Bar",
"Eek"
],
"stock": {
"warehouse": 300,
"retail": 20
}
}
There seems to be at least one pure JS solution now (https://github.com/tdegrunt/jsonschema) available via npm (https://www.npmjs.com/package/jsonschema). I am not a contributor, although I appreciate their work.
I have a Strongloop Loopback Node.js project with some models and relations.
The problem at hand
My problem relates how to query only those Media instances that have a relation to a certain Tag id, using the Angular SDK - while not querying Tags.media (which return Tag instances), but instead making a query somehow that returns plain Media instances.
Please read below for specific information..
Spec
Basically, I have a Model Media which has many 'tags' (model Tag). Think of a image file (Media) having various EXIF tags (Tag). Here is the relation spec (this all works as expected):
Media (media.json):
{
"name": "media",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "string",
"id": true
}
},
"relations": {
"tags": {
"type": "hasAndBelongsToMany",
"model": "tag"
}
}
Tag (tag.json):
{
"name": "tag",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"idInjection": true,
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string",
"required": true
}
},
"relations": {
"medias": {
"type": "hasAndBelongsToMany",
"model": "media"
}
},
"acls": [],
"methods": []
}
Solutions
Now, I know I could do a query like this (using Angular SDK in my example, but the syntax is the same):
injector.get('Tag').find({
'filter': {
'include': 'medias',
'where': {'id': <mytagid>}
}
});
My problem with this approach is, that I receive 1 (one) Tag instance with attached Media instances. This disrupts why whole workflow as I deal only with Media instances.. i just want to filter by Tag id, not bother about Tag at all.
Bottom line
If I see the API explorer (/explorer/), the return value of GET /api/tags/<myTagID>/medias is exactly what I need - an array of Media objects - but how to query them exactly like this using the Angular SDK (lb_services)?
I had a similar problem. One recommendation is to open the lb-services.js and try to find: /tags/:id/medias or something similar. Then you will find a comment like this: // INTERNAL. Use Tags.medias() instead. Or something similar. So that is the method that you should call. Do not call the "prototype$__get....." methods.
Then just call what it says there I suppose: Tag.medias({id:})
Other suggestions:
As you said in your description Media has many Tags. So why not use just
{
"name": "media",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "string",
"id": true
}
},
"relations": {
"tags": {
"type": "hasMany", <---------- hasMany
"model": "tag",
"foreignKey": "tagId" <---FK name
}
}
and
for the tags just belongsTo as type.
{
"name": "tag",
"base": "PersistedModel",
"idInjection": true,
"properties": {
"name": {
"type": "string",
"required": true
}
},
"relations": {
"medias": {
"type": "belongsTo",
"model": "media",
"foreignKey": "mediaId" <---FK name
}
},
"acls": [],
"methods": []
}
But really I don't think this is the problem because you said when you request GET /api/tags/<myTagID>/medias it returns what you want.
Then, in AngularJS you can use:
Media.tags({id:<mediaId>})
for media/:id/tags
and for the other side try:
Tag.medias({id:<tagId>})
Tag.find({
filter:{
where:{mediaId: <mediaId>} <----mediaId comes from FK name
}
})
In this case both are persistent models there is no problems, I had permission problems when doing a similar thing with data that extends User type. But that is another story...
Hope this is helpful, I changed some stuff from a similar app that I am doing and hope not making so many errors when adapting to your code...
I am trying to create some custom maps. I am using ol3 because of the drag and drop feature. The idea is to be able to style each feature on the map.
I drag and drop .gpx and .json files exported from JOSM and create a unique overlay for each feature.
I can change the stroke color etc. with a style function on that overlay. That all works great until I do the next drop.
The dropped features seem to appear in some random order getting interspersed with the ones from the previous drop. I need to have some way to tell which features are new from that drop operation so I can style those without affecting the ones I have already styled.
Is there a unique identifier of some kind that I can get from the feature?
Is there a way that I can tag a feature so with a unique id?
I tried feature.getId() but that is undefined at the time that the drag and drop event fires.
You can define your feature(s) in a json format
var geoSource = new ol.source.GeoJSON({
/* #type {olx.source.GeoJSONOptions} */
"projection": "EPSG:3857" //us
, "object": {
"type": "FeatureCollection"
, "crs": { "type": "name", "properties": { "name": "EPSG:4326" } }//'EPSG:3857'//euro 'urn:ogc:def:crs:EPSG::4326'//'urn:ogc:def:crs:OGC:1.3:CRS84'
, "features": [
{
"type": "Feature", "id": "01"
, "geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [-80.0874386, 26.7816928] }
, "properties": { "myproperty": "West Palm Beach" }
}
, {
"type": "Feature", "id": "02"
, "geometry": { "type": "Point", "coordinates": [-82.0838700, 26.9262480] }
, "properties": { "myproperty": "Punta Gonda" }
}
]
}
});
Then you access the feature by
var ff = geoSource.getFeatureById('02');
alert(ff.getProperties()['myproperty']);
or
if you need to analyse all the features, you can
geoSource.getFeatures().forEach(function (ff) {
alert(ff.getProperties()['myproperty']);
})
Does it help? Good luck.
when creating a feature, you can pass an object with custom properties to the constructor. For example:
var myFeature = new ol.Feature({
geometry: ...,
labelPoint: ..,
name:...,
customProp1: ...,
customProp2: ...,
myCustomID: myRandomIDGenerator()
})