I'm trying to use javascript variables inside laravel blade.
But I'm getting this error.
What should I do for using this ?
var activeTab = $("ul#tablist li.active");
var floor = {!! \App\Floor::find(activeTab.attr('id')) !!}
Use of undefined constant activeTab - assumed 'activeTab'
Ok, so you can have another route like this:
Route::post('/getFloorById', [
'uses' => 'YourController#getFloorById',
'as' => 'getFloorById'
]);
Then, in you controller you have the method:
private function getFloorById($segments)
{
$floorId = $segments[1];
return \App\Floor::find($floorId);
}
And last, you need your javascript code:
var floor = $.post('/getFloorById', {"id": activeTab.attr('id')});
This is the ajax method. Keep in mind that you might need to use echo instead of a return. And you might need to wrap your code into json_encode(\App\Floor::find($floorId)) like this, but for the most part this should get the job done.
You might want to call the post from an onclick event that way you get the new object every time the tab changes.
Unfortunately blade is just a framework to output php. You don't need to do that, and you won't be able to anyways. That would be a big security issue.
If you really need that floor use what #Rohan suggested, javascript directly:
var floor = activeTab.attr('id');
Related
I have following long type session on server side code
long[] grouparray = ..;
Session["grouplist"] = grouparray;
Now I'm trying to get this session on View Page's jquery click function
$("#gpline").click(function () {
parseInt(#Session["grouplist"]);
var grouplistvalues = Session["grouplist"];
alert(grouplistvalues);
});
But this is having error once I debug using firebug
SyntaxError: expected expression, got ']'
parseInt(System.Int64[]);
You need to use Json.Encode and #Html.Raw on your c# data to make it compatible with your scripts.
Try this.
$("#gpline").click(function () {
var grouplistvalues = #Html.Raw(Json.Encode(Session["grouplist"])); // converting the session data into array of numbers in javascript variable
alert(JSON.stringify(grouplistvalues)); // stringify is used only to test.
});
So as you might know, Razor Syntax in ASP.NET MVC does not work in external JavaScript files.
My current solution is to put the Razor Syntax in a a global variable and set the value of that variable from the mvc view that is making use of that .js file.
JavaScript file:
function myFunc() {
alert(myValue);
}
MVC View file:
<script language="text/javascript">
myValue = #myValueFromModel;
</script>
I want to know how I can pass myValue directly as a parameter to the function ? I prefer to have explicit calling with param than relying on globals, however I'm not so keen on javascript.
How would I implement this with javascript parameters? Thanks!
Just have your function accept an argument and use that in the alert (or wherever).
external.js
function myFunc(value) {
alert(value);
}
someview.cshtml
<script>
myFunc(#myValueFromModel);
</script>
One thing to keep in mind though, is that if myValueFromModel is a string then it is going to come through as myFunc(hello) so you need to wrap that in quotes so it becomes myFunc('hello') like this
myFunc('#(myValueFromModel)');
Note the extra () used with razor. This helps the engine distinguish where the break between the razor code is so nothing odd happens. It can be useful when there are nested ( or " around.
edit
If this is going to be done multiple times, then some changes may need to take place in the JavaScript end of things. Mainly that the shown example doesn't properly depict the scenario. It will need to be modified. You may want to use a simple structure like this.
jsFiddle Demo
external.js
var myFunc= new function(){
var func = this,
myFunc = function(){
alert(func.value);
};
myFunc.set = function(value){
func.value = value;
}
return myFunc;
};
someview.cshtml
<script>
myFunc.set('#(myValueFromModel)');
myFunc();//can be called repeatedly now
</script>
I often find that JavaScript in the browser is typically conceptually tied to a specific element. If that's the case for you, you may want to associate the value with that element in your Razor code, and then use JavaScript to extract that value and use it in some way.
For example:
<div class="my-class" data-func-arg="#myValueFromModel"></div>
Static JavaScript:
$(function() {
$('.my-class').click(function() {
var arg = $(this).data('func-arg');
myFunc(arg);
});
});
Do you want to execute your function immediately? Or want to call the funcion with the parameter?
You could add a wrapper function with no parameter and inside call your function with the global var as a parameter. And when you need to call myFunc() you call it trough myFuncWrapper();
function myFuncWrapper(){
myFunc(myValue);
}
function myFunc(myParam){
//function code here;
}
Within a <script> tag in a jsp file I have some code that looks like this:
var chart = new myChart({'id': ${user.id}, 'type': ${user.type}, 'name': {user.name});
Where user is a Spring model attribute set on the server side. My problem is that passing each different field of user feels clunky. It would be nice if I could do something like this:
var chart = new myChart('user': "${user}");
However when done this way the value of ${user} will be an object string that looks like this:
User{id=1, type='admin', name='foo'}
I know that I could just parse this string into an object in my external js, but it feels like there should be a cleaner way to do this. Thanks for the help.
EDIT: Going off of Cameron's answer below I could add this to my server-side controller code:
model.put("user", user);
String userJSON = MyJSONSerializer.serialize(user);
model.put("userJSON", userJSON);
Then in my JSP I could do:
var chart = new myChart({'user': JSON.parse('${userJSON}')});
This does solve my problem of having a messy options object, but it brings up the issue of using two model attributes for the same exact data. It would be ideal if I could use one model attribute for the user object, and then could somehow encode it to JSON on the fly.
You can convert the Object to JSON using a library like Jackson:
public static String objectAsJSON(Object obj) {
try
{
// This could be optimized by making a static ObjectMapper
return new ObjectMapper().writeValueAsString(obj);
}
catch (IOException e)
{
// Log exception and re-throw or return null
return null;
}
}
You could either call this method before putting the objectin your model and reference the String in your JSP like this:
var chart = ${jsonChart};
Or you could write a custom taglib and call objectAsJSON() from there. Then the actual myChart object could go in your model once. Your JSP might look like:
var chart = <chartlib:toJson obj="${chart}" />;
Store and retrieve Google Dart objects in JavaScript library containers
In a Dart application I am using an external JavaScript library to do various matrix calculations.
The specific functionality of the library is not important, what it's important is that I need to store and retrieve Dart object that I put in the matrix.
Dart Class - Lets image i have a dart object that which has a parameter called name
MyDartClass mydc = new MyDartClass(something, something);
mydc.name;
// Everything works as planned
Storing
matrix = js.context.matrix
matrix.cell(1,1).store("thing", new MyDartClass(something, something));
Retrieving
matrix.cell(1,1).has_object_of_type("thing");
// true
MyDartClass mydc = matrix.cell(1,1).retrieve("thing");
Do something with the object
mydc.name;
// Exception: The null object does not have a getter 'name'.
// NoSuchMethodError : method not found: 'name'
// Receiver: null
// Arguments: []
Does the library really work?
Yes it does. I have done the exact same thing in pure javascript many times and there are plenty of test to test the behaviour ( in Javascript )
Is Dart Broken?
When I try to use a javascriptified Hash to do the same behavoiur it works like a charm.
var options = js.map({ 'dart' : new MyDartclass(something, something));
var y = options["dart"];
js.context.console.log(y.name);
// Name is printed
What do you get out from the retrieve?
It seems that I get some kind of Dart Proxy
MyDartClass mydc = matrix.cell(1,1). retrieve("thing");
js.context.console.log(mydc);
DartProxy {id: "dart-ref-20", port: DartSendPortSync}
id: "dart-ref-20"
port: DartSendPortSync
__proto__: DartProxy
I belive that the lib stores the objects, deep down, in a hash map. But it seems like when I retrieve the object into the Dart I get something, but not in a way that I can work with it. So i need help since I don't know how to make it work.
Do I need to de-proxify the object?
Perhaps it IS a Dart bug when you try to retrieve objects from hashes inside objects
Perhaps I missunderstod everything that this is not suppose to work.
Passing and retrieving Dart objects inside the same scope is working. There's the following test case in the tests of js-interop to proove it :
test('retrieve same dart Object', () {
final date = new DateTime.now();
js.context.dartDate = date;
expect(js.context.dartDate, equals(date));
});
However there seems to be an issue with multiple scopes (and multiple event loops as well). There is no way to retain a dart object for now. So your dart object reference goes away at the end of scope. Here's a simple test case that fails :
test('retrieve same dart Object', () {
final date = new DateTime.now();
js.scoped(() {
js.context.dartDate = date;
});
js.scoped(() {
expect(js.context.dartDate, equals(date));
});
});
Please file an issue.
I am just starting to get into JavaScript and couldn't find an exact scenario like this yet on SO, so I'm going to try my luck. I have two functions in an external JS file which create video feeds on our website:
function getVideos() {
//gets a list of videos
}
//callback function automatically called by getVideos()
function response(jsonData) { //can't change this line
var resp = document.getElementById("resp"); //can change this line and any subsequent lines
//parses data and populates resp
}
Then, from the HTML side, we just call getVideos() and the video feed will be created and populated.
However, I want to be able to pass any element ID I want into response() so that we can create multiple video feeds in different places on the same page. The thing is I can't change the function declaration of response() to include another parameter. Or at least I'm not led to believe I can by the company hosting our videos.
I've tried wrapping response() with getVideos() and passing an element ID from there, but then response() doesn't get called, and the only solution I can think of is resorting to storing an element ID in a global variable, which I know is a no-no in general in JavaScript.
My question is: Do I just bite the bullet and use a global variable, or is there another way?
For more info, here is our JS code as it stands now (with the closure): http://www.thebearrocks.com/Other/js/videoFeed/createVideoFeed.js
And here is the tutorial on response() we're following from the host of our videos: http://support.brightcove.com/en/video-cloud/docs/making-media-api-calls-dynamic-script-tags
may be you can use arguments? like so:
function response(jsonData) { //callback function automatically called by getVideos()
var elemId = arguments.length<2 ? "resp" : arguments[1]+"";
var resp = document.getElementById(elemId);
//parses data and populates resp
}
or, declare second argument what has default value like this:
function response(jsonData, elemId) {
elemId = elemId || "resp";
var resp = document.getElementById(elemId);
//parses data and populates resp
}
in this case function can be called as with one or two arguments
I've tried wrapping response() with getVideos() and passing an element ID from there, but then response() doesn't get called, and the only solution I can think of is resorting to storing an element ID in a global variable, which I know is a no-no in general in JavaScript.
My question is: Do I just bite the bullet and use a global variable, or is there another way?
No. Not the id variable needs to become global, but your local response function needs to for getting called back from the JSONP script - you're going to create a closure.
You can "export" it by calling
window.response = mylocalResponseFunction; // you did name that local var "response"