I need to set the background color of one of the buttons in the form's ribbon. This isn't supported through Ribbon Workbench, so I have written following javascripts to achieve the same:
function setOpportunityRibbonsAppearance() {
var submitToForeCastButton = parent.document.getElementById("opportunity|NoRelationship|Form|sfw.opportunity.Button1.Button");
if (submitToForeCastButton != null) {
submitToForeCastButton.style.backgroundColor = "lightyellow";
}
}
I have registered this scripts in Form Load event. However the issue is that, I always get parent.document.getElementById as null only.
Surprisingly, I am able to see the control while running the parent.document.getElementById statement in the browser's console, and can also change the styling attributes.
Can anyone please suggest what could be wrong here?
P.S. - I understand document.getElementById is not recommended to use in CRM, however, I am left with no other choice while trying to change the appearance of some of the buttons.
Any help on this, will be much appreciated.
You could upload an icon with a yellow background, to keep everything supported. You won't see text on yellow but it might work for you. Easy and standard.
To keep it unsupported and ugly, you could just keep on trying until you make it, setInterval allows for a function to be repeated:
function setOpportunityRibbonsAppearance() {
var submitToForeCastButton = null;
var interval = setInterval(function(){
submitToForeCastButton = parent.document.getElementById("opportunity|NoRelationship|Form|sfw.opportunity.Button1.Button");
if(submitToForeCastButton != null) {
submitToForeCastButton.style.backgroundColor = "lightyellow";
clearInterval(interval);
}
}, 500); // Every 500ms. Adjust as needed, not too fast or browser will choke.
}
Its probably because your script is running before the page is fully loaded.
Try adding a delay to the to the function Put a Delay in Javascript
This is the first time I get my hands on with automation instruments in xcode The script works well for all button taps but the one making server connection. I don't know the reason
Here is the script I tried so far
var target = UIATarget.localTarget();
target.pushTimeout(4);
target.popTimeout();
var window=target.frontMostApp().mainWindow()
var appScroll=window.scrollViews()[0];
appScroll.logElementTree();
UIATarget.localTarget().delay(2);
appScroll.buttons()[1].tap();
The above script works up to showing the UIActivityIndicator instead of moving to next controller after success
I know There must be a very simple point I am missing. So help me out
UIAutomation attempts to make things "easy" for the developer, but in doing so it can make things very confusing. It sounds like you're getting a reference to window, waiting for a button to appear, then executing .tap() on that button.
I see that you've already considered messing with target.pushTimeout(), which is related to your issue. The timeout system lets you do something that would be impossible in any sane system: get a reference to an element before it exists. I suspect that behind-the-scenes, UIAutomation repeatedly attempts to get the reference you want -- as long as the timeout will allow.
So, in the example you've posted, it's possible for this "feature" to actually hurt you.
var window=target.frontMostApp().mainWindow()
var appScroll=window.scrollViews()[0];
UIATarget.localTarget().delay(2);
appScroll.buttons()[1].tap();
What if the view changes during the 2-second delay? Your reference to target.frontMostApp().mainWindow.scrollViews()[0] may be invalid, or it may not point to the object you think you're pointing at.
We got around this in our Illuminator framework by forgetting about the timeout system altogether, and just manually re-evaluating a given reference until it actually returns something. We called it waitForChildExistence, but the functionality is basically as follows:
var myTimeout = 3; // how long we want to wait
// this function selects an element
// relative to a parent element (target) that we will pass in
var selectorFn = function (myTarget) {
var ret = myTarget.frontMostApp().mainWindow.scrollViews()[0];
// assert that ret exists, is visible, etc
return ret;
}
// re-evaluate our selector until we get something
var element = null;
var later = get_current_time() + myTimeout;
while (element === null && get_current_time() < later) {
try {
element = selectorFn(target);
} catch (e) {
// must not have worked
}
}
// check whether element is still null
// do something with element
For cases where there is a temporary progress dialog, this code will simply wait for it to disappear before successfully returning the element you want.
IE takes forever to load my GridView where as Firefox is almost instant (big surprise I know; but you know users and how they love IE).
We have a GridView which when the user scrolls to the bottom loads more entries into the list (basically lazy loading, instead of loading the whole list, it loads 20 entries and when you scroll to the bottom it loads the next 20). However like I said there is a huge difference in how this performs on IE vs FF. When debugging on IE I consistently get Javascript timeout errors.
during this code block:
function Sys$WebForms$PageRequestManager$_endPostBack(error, executor, data) {
if (this._request === executor.get_webRequest()) {
this._processingRequest = false;
this._additionalInput = null;
this._request = null;
}
var handler = this._get_eventHandlerList().getHandler("endRequest");
var errorHandled = false;
if (handler) {
var eventArgs = new Sys.WebForms.EndRequestEventArgs(error, data ? data.dataItems : {}, executor);
handler(this, eventArgs);
errorHandled = eventArgs.get_errorHandled();
}
if (error && !errorHandled) {
throw error;
}
}
This error AFAIK is the reason we implemented lazy loading (to get rid of the timeouts). However it seems to not be helping, merely duplicating the issue every time is runs. NOTE: prior to our last release it would load all the data as opposed to Lazy Loading.
Also when debugging it seems to cycle on this piece of code when it is "loading" on IE:
Protected Overrides ReadOnly Property ControlSkins() As System.Collections.IDictionary
Get
Return Me.__controlSkins
End Get
End Property
I believe due to fact that FF displays the data without the timeout that whatever is causing this is specific to IE and maybe common to other implementation of a GridView population.
I should note however that Im not positive that FF communicates with VS like IE does. Meaning that the warnings I get (the screenshot above) might happen on FF and VS doesnt show them to me but like I said FF has no problems with our page.
Followup [similar error q/a]:
After further testing the ControlSkins() method that is getting called repeatedly (posted above) here is its value. It alternates between that HybridDictionary and Nothing
I have to continue testing but I think/hope (fingers are crossed) that adding AsyncPostBackTimeout="300" on my ScriptManager (for that widget) has stopped the timeout error. Of course this doesn't help with the large load times on IE.
I have some JScript code (converted from some old VBScript) that starts like this:
var Word = new ActiveXObject("Word.Basic");
Word.FileNew(); // opens new Word document
Word.Insert(IncorrectText);
Word.ToolsSpelling(); // opens spell check behind IE
The idea is to utilize the MS Word spell check for browser use, and it works well in XP, but the spell check box opens in the background in Windows 7 / IE 8 (this question tells me that the problem started in Vista and is probably an OS issue, not a browser or Office issue).
So my question is, how can I bring this window to the foreground? One important note is that the last line, Word.ToolsSpelling();, locks up my script, so anything I do will need to be before that.
I've tried
var wshShell = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Shell");
wshShell.AppActivate("Document1 - Microsoft Word"); // or some other text
before the ToolsSpelling call, but this does not do anything (maybe because the Word document is not actually revealed at this point?). Of course, this will only work if no "Document1" is already opened, so this is a questionable thought to begin with.
Per this answer, I tried using window.blur(); in order to blur IE, but this will only work if the IE window is the only one opened. Maybe there's some way I can loop through all opened windows and apply this?
SetForegroundWindow looked promising, but I don't know how to use it in JSript.
Any ideas?
Note: Browser permissions will be completely open for this site.
Update: Turns out if you use Word.Application, the spell check comes up in front as it should. Only the Word.Basic method has this problem (I don't expect to know why this side of eternity):
var wordApp = new ActiveXObject("Word.Application");
wordApp.Documents.Add();
wordDoc = wordApp.ActiveDocument;
... // safety checks before insertion
wordSelection.TypeText(IncorrectText);
wordDoc.CheckSpelling();
wordApp.Visible = false; // CheckSpelling makes the document visible
You might be able to jigger the window state. When the window is maximized after having been minimized, Windows will stack that in front (zIndex to top).
Something like:
var WIN_MAX = 2;
var WIN_MIN = 1;
var Word = new ActiveXObject("Word.Application");
Word.Visible = true;
// minimize the app
Word.WindowState = WIN_MIN ;
// in 500ms, maximize
setTimeout(function () {
Word.WindowState = WIN_MAX;
}, 500);
The setTimeout call seeks to work around a timing issue; Windows will sometimes "get confused" when a programmatic minimize/maximize happens in immediate succession. You might have to extend that delay a little, test it repeatedly and see what kind of results you get.
I am needing to detect when a user is inactive (not clicking or typing) on the current page for more than 30 minutes.
I thinking it might be best to use event blubbling attached to the body tag and then just keep resetting a timer for 30 minutes, but I'm not exactly sure how to create this.
I have jQuery available, although I'm not sure how much of this will actually use jQuery.
Edit: I'm more needing to know if they are actively using the site, therefore clicking (changing fields or position within a field or selecting checkboxes/radios) or typing (in an input, textarea, etc). If they are in another tab or using another program, then my assumption is they are not using the site and therefore should be logged out (for security reasons).
Edit #2: So everyone is clear, this is not at all for determining if the user is logged in, authenticated or anything. Right now the server will log the user out if they don't make a page request within 30 minutes. This functionality to prevent the times when someone spends >30 minutes filling in a form and then submitting the form only to find out that they haven't been logged out. Therefore, this will be used in combination with the server site to determine if the user is inactive (not clicking or typing). Basically, the deal is that after 25 minutes of idle, they will be presented with a dialog to enter their password. If they don't within 5 minutes, the system automatically logs them out as well as the server's session is logged out (next time a page is accessed, as with most sites).
The Javascript is only used as a warning to user. If JavaScript is disabled, then they won't get the warning and (along with most of the site not working) they will be logged out next time they request a new page.
This is what I've come up with. It seems to work in most browsers, but I want to be sure it will work everywhere, all the time:
var timeoutTime = 1800000;
var timeoutTimer = setTimeout(ShowTimeOutWarning, timeoutTime);
$(document).ready(function() {
$('body').bind('mousedown keydown', function(event) {
clearTimeout(timeoutTimer);
timeoutTimer = setTimeout(ShowTimeOutWarning, timeoutTime);
});
});
Anyone see any problems?
Ifvisible.js is a crossbrowser lightweight solution that does just that. It can detect when the user switches to another tab and back to the current tab. It can also detect when the user goes idle and becomes active again. It's pretty flexible.
You can watch mouse movement, but that's about the best you're going to get for indication of a user still being there without listening to the click event. But there is no way for javascript to tell if it is the active tab or if the browser is even open. (well, you could get the width and height of the browser and that'd tell you if it was minimized)
I just recently did something like this, albeit using Prototype instead of JQuery, but I imagine the implementation would be roughly the same as long as JQuery supports custom events.
In a nutshell, IdleMonitor is a class that observes mouse and keyboard events (adjust accordingly for your needs). Every 30 seconds it resets the timer and broadcasts an state:idle event, unless it gets a mouse/key event, in which case it broadcasts a state:active event.
var IdleMonitor = Class.create({
debug: false,
idleInterval: 30000, // idle interval, in milliseconds
active: null,
initialize: function() {
document.observe("mousemove", this.sendActiveSignal.bind(this));
document.observe("keypress", this.sendActiveSignal.bind(this));
this.timer = setTimeout(this.sendIdleSignal.bind(this), this.idleInterval);
},
// use this to override the default idleInterval
useInterval: function(ii) {
this.idleInterval = ii;
clearTimeout(this.timer);
this.timer = setTimeout(this.sendIdleSignal.bind(this), ii);
},
sendIdleSignal: function(args) {
// console.log("state:idle");
document.fire('state:idle');
this.active = false;
clearTimeout(this.timer);
},
sendActiveSignal: function() {
if(!this.active){
// console.log("state:active");
document.fire('state:active');
this.active = true;
this.timer = setTimeout(this.sendIdleSignal.bind(this), this.idleInterval);
}
}
});
Then I just created another class that has the following somewhere in it:
Event.observe(document, 'state:idle', your-on-idle-functionality);
Event.observe(document, 'state:active', your-on-active-functionality)
Ifvisible is a nice JS lib to check user inactivity.
ifvisible.setIdleDuration(120); // Page will become idle after 120 seconds
ifvisible.on("idle", function(){
// do something
});
Using jQuery, you can easily watch mouse movement, and use it to set a variable indicating activity to true, then using vanilla javascript, you can check this variable every 30 minutes (or any other interval) to see if its true. If it's false, run your function or whatever.
Look up setTimeout and setInterval for doing the timing. You'll also probably have to run a function every minute or so to reset the variable to false.
Here my shot:
var lastActivityDateTime = null;
function checkActivity( )
{
var currentTime = new Date();
var diff = (lastActivityDateTime.getTime( ) - currentTime.getTime( ));
if ( diff >= 30*60*1000)
{
//user wasn't active;
...
}
setTimeout( 30*60*1000-diff, checkActivity);
}
setTimeout( 30*60*1000, checkActivity); // for first time we setup for 30 min.
// for each event define handler and inside update global timer
$( "body").live( "event_you_want_to_track", handler);
function handler()
{
lastActivityDateTime = new Date();
// rest of your code if needed.
}
If it's a security issue, doing this clientside with javascript is absolutely the wrong end of the pipe to be performing this check. The user could easily have javascript disabled: what does your application do then? What if the user closes their browser before the timeout. do they ever get logged out?
Most serverside frameworks have some kind of session timeout setting for logins. Just use that and save yourself the engineering work.
You can't rely on the assumption that people cannot log in without javascript, therefore the user has javascript. Such an assumption is no deterrent to any determined, or even modestly educated attacker.
Using javascript for this is like a security guard handing customers the key to the bank vault. The only way it works is on faith.
Please believe me when I say that using javascript in this way (and requiring javascript for logins!!) is an incredibly thick skulled way to engineer any kind of web app.
Without using JS, a simpler (and safer) way would simply be to have a lastActivity timestamp stored with the user's session and checking it on page load. Assuming you are using PHP (you can easily redo this code for another platform):
if(($_SESSION['lastAct'] + 1800) < time()) {
unset($_SESSION);
session_destroy();
header('Location: session_timeout_message.php');
exit;
}
$_SESSION['lastAct'] = time();
and add this in your page (optional, the user will be logged out regardless of if the page is refreshed or not (as he logs out on next page log)).
<meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1801;" />
You can add and remove classes to the document depending on the user active status.
// If the window is focused, a mouse wheel or touchmove event is detected
$(window).on('focus wheel touchmove', function() {
$( 'html' ).addClass('active').removeClass('inactive');
});
// If the window losses focus
$(window).on('blur', function() {
$( 'html' ).addClass('inactive').removeClass('active');
});
After that, you can check every while if the html has the "active" class and send an AJAX request to check the session status and perform the action you need:
setInterval( function() {
if ( $( 'html' ).hasClass('active') ) {
//Send ajax request to check the session
$.ajax({
//your parameters here
});
}
}, 60000 ); /* loops every minute */
If your concern is the lost of information for the user after a login timeout; another option would be to simply store all the posted information upon the opening of a new session (a new session will always be started when the older session has been closed/scrapped by the server) when the request to a page is made before re-routing to the logging page. If the user successfully login, then you can use this saved information to return the user back to where he was. This way, even if the user walk away a few hours, he can always return back to where he was after a successful login; without losing any information.
This require more work by the programmer but it's a great feature totally appreciated by the users. They especially appreciate the fact that they can fully concentrate about what they have to do without stressing out about potentially losing their information every 30 minutes or so.