LoopbackJS register model for unit test - javascript

I want to unit test a mixin.
So I need to create a loopback 3.x application completely in code.
It works so far and it registers my mixin, but it doesn't register my model.
It is not exposed over REST, but thats exactly what I need.
Here is my code:
// create loopback app
app = loopback();
app.use(loopback.rest());
// create data source
app.dataSource('db', {
name: 'db',
connector: loopback.Memory
});
app.loopback.modelBuilder.mixins.define('accesscheck', AccessCheck);
app.loopback.createModel({
name: 'AccesscheckTest',
plural: 'AccesscheckTests',
base: "PersistedModel",
accesscheck: [{
permission: "ALLOW",
roles: [
'admin'
],
accessScope: "organization",
method: "findById"
}],
mixins: [
"accesscheck"
]
});
var Accesscheck = app.loopback.getModel('Accesscheck');
app.model(Accesscheck, { dataSource: 'db', public: true });
// start server
var connection = app.listen(3000, () => {
if (done) {
done();
}
});
app.activeConnection = connection;
return app;
PS: I know that there is the ACL Model in loopback but it doesn't fit my need so I need to implement my own Accesscheck.

You need to call boot from loopback-boot.
I think it's better to require the server.js in test units.
And make config file for test in this pattern datasources.test.json and a script in package.json for test like this : "test": "NODE_ENV=test ./node_modules/mocha/bin/mocha --recursive",
So there is no need to create models in unit tests anymore.

Related

Defining Auth strategy using Glue

I am using glue to spin up the hapi server so I gave the json object with connection and registration details.
I have 10 routes and i need to use authentication strategy for all the 10 routes, So followed the below steps
1) I have registered the xyz custom auth plugin
2) Defined the strategy server.auth.strategy('xyz', 'xyz', { });
3) At every route level I am enabling auth strategy
auth: {
strategies: ['xyz'],
}
How can I give below line to glue configuration object itself.
server.auth.strategy('xyz', 'xyz', { });
Glue.compose(ServerConfig, { relativeTo: baseDir }, (err, server) => {
internals.server = server;
})
One more question here is, in this line server.auth.strategy('xyz', 'xyz', { from json file}); I am reading the JSON data from a config file. When I change the data in this JSON file I dont want to restart the server manually to load the modified data. Is there any plugin or custom code to achieve this?
I figured out a general workaround for when you want to do setup that Glue does not directly support (AFAIK) and you also don't want to keep adding to index.js.
Create a plugins folder where your manifest.js is located.
Create a file plugins/auth.js (in this case). Here you will have a register callback with access to the server object and you can make setup calls that go beyond what Glue does declaratively.
Add a plugin item to manifest.js pointing to your plugin file.
in manifest.js:
register: {
plugins: [
{
plugin: './plugins/auth',
},
]
}
in plugins/auth.js:
module.exports = {
name: 'auth',
async register (server) {
await server.register([
require('#hapi/cookie'),
]);
server.auth.strategy('session', 'cookie', {
cookie: {
name: 'sid-example',
password: '!wsYhFA*C2U6nz=Bu^%A#^F#SF3&kSR6',
isSecure: false
},
redirectTo: '/login',
validateFunc: async (request, session) => {
const account = await users.find(
(user) => (user.id === session.id)
);
if (!account) {
return { valid: false };
}
return { valid: true, credentials: account };
}
});
server.auth.default('session');
},
};
(auth setup code is from the Hapi docs at enter link description here)
This is the way I have found where I can call things like server.auth.strategy() sort-of from manifest.js.
Note: Auth is not a great example for this technique as there is a special folder for auth strategies in lib/auth/strategies.

Angular.js+nw.js+webpack+karma+jasmine how to test

I have a nw.js native application with angular.js inside. My app bundled with webpack and contains native node.js modules. My entry point is index.js file that I organized like this:
var gui = require('nw.gui');
var angular = require('angular');
require('./app.css');
// other modules
var myApp = angular.module('myApp', [
'ngRaven',
'ngMaterial',
'ngMessages'
]).constant(
'fs', require('fs')
)
require('./services')(myApp);
require('./directives')(myApp);
require('./factories')(myApp);
require('./filters')(myApp);
require('./controllers')(myApp);
require('./app.js')(myApp);
My webpack config looks like this:
const path = require('path');
const config = {
entry: [
'./app/index.js'
],
output: {
path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'app'),
filename: 'bundle.js'
},
devtool: "source-map",
target: 'node-webkit',
module:{
// css, html loaders
},
node: {
os: true,
fs: true,
child_process: true,
__dirname: true,
__filename: true
}
};
module.exports = config;
So every dependency include Node.js native modules like fs, path, child_process bundled in one big file bundle.js that i include in html and then package my nw.js app. So my app structure looks like:
my_project:
--app
----controllers
------welcome
--------welcome.js // Page controller
--------welcome.html // Page HTML
------index.js // here I include each page controller
----app.js // My angular app initialization
----index.js // here I include all dependencies
I'm trying to run tests with this structure. I tried karma+jasmine, karma+mocha, tried different configurations, my last one looks like:
module.exports = function (config) {
config.set({
basePath: '',
frameworks: ['jasmine'],
files: [
'app/bundle.js',
'app/**/*spec.js'
],
exclude: [],
preprocessors: {
'app/bundle.js': ['webpack']
},
reporters: ['progress'],
port: 9876,
colors: true,
logLevel: config.LOG_INFO,
autoWatch: true,
browsers: ['ChromeHeadlessNoSandbox'],
customLaunchers: {
ChromeHeadlessNoSandbox: {
base: 'ChromeHeadless',
flags: ['--no-sandbox']
}
},
singleRun: true,
webpack: {
// you don't need to specify the entry option because
// karma watches the test entry points
// webpack watches dependencies
// ... remainder of webpack configuration (or import)
},
webpackMiddleware: {
// webpack-dev-middleware configuration
// i.e.
noInfo: true,
// and use stats to turn off verbose output
stats: {
// options i.e.
chunks: false
}
}
});
};
But my tests still not see the angular application.
describe('Welcome page', function() {
beforeEach(angular.mock.module('WelcomePageCtrl'));
});
P.S I don't require exactly karma and jasminne, so any solution will be appreciated. I just want to cover my project with tests
I have gone through something similar myself. I don't think you need the bundle.js for your tests.
Here is how would do it:
I assume your controller/service/etc implementation is as follows:
/* app/controller/welcome.js */
module.exports = function(app) {
return app.controller("MyCtrl", function($scope) {
$scope.name = "lebouf";
});
};
I like my test code to sit right beside the code I'm testing (Welcome.spec.js in the same directory as Welcome.js). That test code would look like so:
/* app/controller/welcome.spec.js */
beforeEach(function() {
var app = angular.module("myApp", []); //module definition
require("./welcome")(app);
});
beforeEach(mockModule("myApp"));
describe("MyCtrl", () => {
var scope = {};
beforeEach(mockInject(function($controller) {
$controller("MyCtrl", {
$scope: scope
});
}));
it("has name in its scope", function() {
expect(scope.name).to.equal("not lebouf"); //the test will fail
});
});
Except, this is an angular controller we're testing and it's not that simple. We need the angular object itself. So lets set it up. I'll explain why it is done how it is done next:
/* test-setup.js */
const jsdom = require("jsdom").jsdom; //v5.6.1
const chai = require("chai");
global.document = jsdom("<html><head></head><body></body></html>", {});
global.window = document.defaultView;
global.window.mocha = true;
global.window.beforeEach = beforeEach;
global.window.afterEach = afterEach;
require("angular/angular");
require("angular-mocks");
global.angular = window.angular;
global.mockInject = angular.mock.inject;
global.mockModule = angular.mock.module;
global.expect = chai.expect;
console.log("ALL SET");
And we'll run the tests as:
node_modules/.bin/mocha ./init.js app/**/*.spec.js
#or preferably as `npm test` by copying the abev statement into package.json
extra info
Here is how init.js is setup as is:
jsdom: f you require("angular/angular") you'll see that it needs a window instance. jsdom can create documents and windows and so on without a web browser!
window.mocha: we need angular-mocks to populate our angular with the necessary utilities. But if you look at the code you'll notice that window.mocha || window.jasmine needs to be true. Thats whywindow.mocha = true`
window.beforeEach, window.afterEach: the same reason as above; because angular-mocks.js demands it.
I set some global variables that I plan to use commonly in my tests: angular, expect, mockInject, mockModule.
Also these may provide some additional information:
https://kasperlewau.github.io/post/angular-without-karma/
https://gist.github.com/rikukissa/dcb422eb3b464cc184ae

Grunt Environment Variables Don't Get Set Until All Tasks Loaded

I am using the npm modules grunt env and load-grunt-config in my project. grunt env handles environment variables for you, while load-grunt-config handles, well, loads the grunt configuration for you. You can put your tasks into other files, then load-grunt-config will bundle them up and have grunt load & consume them for you. You can also make an aliases.js file, with tasks you want to combine together into one task, running one after another. It's similar to the grunt.registerTask task in the original Gruntfile.js. I put all my grunt tasks inside a separate grunt/ folder under the root folder with the main Gruntfile, with no extra subfolders, as suggested by the load-grunt-config README.md on Github. Here is my slimmed-down Gruntfile:
module.exports = function(grunt) {
'use strict';
require('time-grunt')(grunt);
// function & property declarations
grunt.initConfig({
pkg: grunt.file.readJSON('package.json')
});
require('load-grunt-config')(grunt, {
init: true,
loadGruntConfig: {
scope: 'devDependencies',
pattern: ['grunt-*', 'time-grunt']
}
});
};
In theory, setting all these files up the correct way for load-grunt-config to load should be exactly the same as just having a Gruntfile.js. However, I seem to have run into a little snag. It seems the environment variables set under the env task do not get set for the subsequent grunt tasks, but are set by the time node processes its tasks, in this case an express server.
grunt env task:
module.exports = {
// environment variable values for developers
// creating/maintaining site
dev: {
options: {
add: {
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 27017,
SERVER_PORT: 3000
}
}
}
};
grunt-shell-spawn task:
// shell command tasks
module.exports = {
// starts up MongoDB server/daemon
mongod: {
command: 'mongod --bind_ip konneka.org --port ' + (process.env.MONGO_PORT || 27017) + ' --dbpath C:/MongoDB/data/db --ipv6',
options: {
async: true, // makes this command asynchronous
stdout: false, // does not print to the console
stderr: true, // prints errors to the console
failOnError: true, // fails this task when it encounters errors
execOptions: {
cwd: '.'
}
}
}
};
grunt express task:
module.exports = {
// default options
options: {
hostname: '127.0.0.1', // allow connections from localhost
port: (process.env.SERVER_PORT || 3000), // default port
},
prod: {
options: {
livereload: true, // automatically reload server when express pages change
// serverreload: true, // run forever-running server (do not close when finished)
server: path.resolve(__dirname, '../backend/page.js'), // express server file
bases: 'dist/' // watch files in app folder for changes
}
}
};
aliases.js file (grunt-load-config's way of combining tasks so they run one after the other):
module.exports = {
// starts forever-running server with "production" environment
server: ['env:prod', 'shell:mongod', 'express:prod', 'express-keepalive']
};
part of backend/env/prod.js (environment-specific Express configuration, loaded if NODE_ENV is set to "prod", modeled after MEAN.JS):
'use strict';
module.exports = {
port: process.env.SERVER_PORT || 3001,
dbUrl: process.env.MONGOHQ_URL || process.env.MONGOLAB_URI || 'mongodb://konneka.org:' + (process.env.MONGO_PORT || 27018) + '/mean'
};
part of backend/env/dev.js (environment-specific Express configuration for dev environment, loaded if the `NODE_ENV variable is not set or is set to "dev"):
module.exports = {
port: process.env.SERVER_PORT || 3000,
dbUrl: 'mongodb://konneka.org:' + (process.env.MONGO_PORT || 27017) + '/mean-dev'
};
part of backend/page.js (my Express configuration page, also modeled after MEAN.JS):
'use strict';
var session = require('express-session');
var mongoStore = require('connect-mongo')(session);
var express = require('express');
var server = express();
...
// create the database object
var monServer = mongoose.connect(environ.dbUrl);
// create a client-server session, using a MongoDB collection/table to store its info
server.use(session({
resave: true,
saveUninitialized: true,
secret: environ.sessionSecret,
store: new mongoStore({
db: monServer.connections[0].db, // specify the database these sessions will be saved into
auto_reconnect: true
})
}));
...
// listen on port related to environment variable
server.listen(process.env.SERVER_PORT || 3000);
module.exports = server;
When I run grunt server, I get:
$ cd /c/repos/konneka/ && grunt server
Running "env:prod" (env) task
Running "shell:mongod" (shell) task
Running "express:prod" (express) task
Running "express-server:prod" (express-server) task
Web server started on port:3000, hostname: 127.0.0.1 [pid: 3996]
Running "express-keepalive" task
Fatal error: failed to connect to [konneka.org:27018]
Execution Time (2014-08-15 18:05:31 UTC)
loading tasks 38.3s █████████████████████████████████ 79%
express-server:prod 8.7s ████████ 18%
express-keepalive 1.2s ██ 2%
Total 48.3s
Now, I can't seem to get the database connected in the first place, but ignore that for now. Notice that the server is started on port 3000, meaning that during execution of the grunt express:prod task, SERVER_PORT is not set so the port gets set to 3000. There are numerous other examples like this, where an environment variable is not set so my app uses the default. However, notice that session tries to connect to the database on port 27018 (and fails), so MONGO_PORT does get set eventually.
If I had just tried the grunt server task, I could chalk it up to load-grunt-config running the tasks in parallel instead of one after the other or some other error, but even when I try the tasks one-by-one, such as running grunt env:prod shell:mongod express-server:prod express-keepalive, I get similar (incorrect) results, so either grunt or grunt env run the tasks in parallel, as well, or something else is going on.
What's going on here? Why are the environment variables not set correctly for later grunt tasks? When are they eventually set, and why then rather than some other time? How can I make them get set for grunt tasks themselves rather than after, assuming there even is a way?
The solution is rather obvious once you figure it out, so let's start at the beginning:
The problem
You're using load-grunt-config to load a set of modules (objects that define tasks) and combine them into one module (object) and pass it along to Grunt. To better understand what load-grunt-config is doing, take a moment to read through the source (it's just three files). So, instead of writing:
// filename: Gruntfile.js
grunt.initConfig({
foo: {
a: {
options: {},
}
},
bar: {
b: {
options: {},
}
}
});
You can write this:
// filename: grunt/foo.js
module.exports = {
a: {
options: {},
}
}
// filename: grunt/bar.js
module.exports = {
b: {
options: {},
}
}
// filename: Gruntfile.js
require('load-grunt-config')(grunt);
Basically, this way you can split up a Grunt configuration into multiple files and have it be more "maintainable". But what you'll need to realize is that these two approaches are semantically equivalent. That is, you can expect them to behave the same way.
Thus, when you write the following*:
(* I've reduced the problem in an attempt to make this answer a bit more general and to reduce noise. I've excluded things like loading the tasks and extraneous option passing, but the error should still be the same. Also note that I've changed the values of the environment variables because the default was the same as what was being set.)
// filename: grunt/env.js
module.exports = {
dev: {
options: {
add: {
// These values are different for demo purposes
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 'dev_mongo_port',
SERVER_PORT: 'dev_server_port'
}
}
}
};
// filename: grunt/shell.js
module.exports = {
mongod: {
command: 'mongod --port ' + (process.env.MONGO_PORT || 27017)
}
};
// filename: grunt/aliases.js
module.exports = {
server: ['env:prod', 'shell:mongod']
};
// filename: Gruntfile.js
module.exports = function (grunt) {
require('load-grunt-config')(grunt);
};
You can consider the above the same as below:
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.initConfig({
env: {
dev: {
options: {
add: {
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 'dev_mongo_port',
SERVER_PORT: 'dev_server_port'
}
}
}
},
shell: {
mongod: {
command: 'mongod --port ' + (process.env.MONGO_PORT || 27017)
}
}
});
grunt.registerTask('server', ['env:dev', 'shell:mongod']);
};
Now do you see the problem? What command do you expect shell:mongod to run? The correct answer is:
mongod --port 27017
Where what you want to be executed is:
mongo --port dev_mongo_port
The problem is that when (process.env.MONGO_PORT || 27017) is evaluated the environment variables have not yet been set (i.e. before the env:dev task has been run).
A solution
Well let's look at a working Grunt configuration before splitting it across multiple files:
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.initConfig({
env: {
dev: {
options: {
add: {
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 'dev_mongo_port',
SERVER_PORT: 'dev_server_port'
}
}
}
},
shell: {
mongod: {
command: 'mongod --port ${MONGO_PORT:-27017}'
}
}
});
grunt.registerTask('server', ['env:dev', 'shell:mongod']);
};
Now when you run shell:mongod, the command will contain ${MONGO_PORT:-27017} and Bash (or just sh) will look for the environment variable you would have set in the task before it (i.e. env:dev).
Okay, that's all well and good for the shell:mongod task, but what about the other tasks, Express for example?
You'll need to move away from environment variables (unless you want to set them up before invoking Grunt. Why? Take this Grunt configuration for example:
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.initConfig({
env: {
dev: {
options: {
add: {
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 'dev_mongo_port',
SERVER_PORT: 'dev_server_port'
}
}
}
},
express: {
options: {
hostname: '127.0.0.1'
port: (process.env.SERVER_PORT || 3000)
},
prod: {
options: {
livereload: true
server: path.resolve(__dirname, '../backend/page.js'),
bases: 'dist/'
}
}
}
});
grunt.registerTask('server', ['env:dev', 'express:prod']);
};
What port will the express:prod task configuration contain? 3000. What you need is for it to reference the value you've defined in the above task. How you do this is up to you. You could:
Separate the env configuration and reference its values
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.config('env', {
dev: {
options: {
add: {
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 'dev_mongo_port',
SERVER_PORT: 'dev_server_port'
}
}
}
});
grunt.config('express', {
options: {
hostname: '127.0.0.1'
port: '<%= env.dev.options.add.SERVER_PORT %>'
}
});
grunt.registerTask('server', ['env:dev', 'express:prod']);
};
But you'll notice that the semantics of the env task don't hold up here due to it no longer representing a task's configuration. You could use an object of your own design:
module.exports = function (grunt) {
grunt.config('env', {
dev: {
NODE_ENV: 'dev',
MONGO_PORT: 'dev_mongo_port',
SERVER_PORT: 'dev_server_port'
}
});
grunt.config('express', {
options: {
hostname: '127.0.0.1'
port: '<%= env.dev.SERVER_PORT %>'
}
});
grunt.registerTask('server', ['env:dev', 'express:prod']);
};
Pass grunt an argument to specify what config it should use
Have multiple configuration files (e.g. Gruntfile.js.dev and Gruntfile.js.prod) and rename them as needed
Read a development configuration file (e.g. grunt.file.readJSON('config.development.json')) if it exists and fall back to a production configuration file if it doesn't exist
Some better way not listed here
But all of the above should achieve the same end result.
This seems to be the essence of what you are trying to do, and it works for me. The important part was what I mentioned in my comment -- chaining the environment task before running the other tasks.
Gruntfile.js
module.exports = function(grunt) {
// Do grunt-related things in here
grunt.loadNpmTasks('grunt-env');
grunt.initConfig({
env: {
dev: {
PROD : 'http://production.server'
}
}
});
grunt.registerTask('printEnv', 'prints a message with an env var', function() { console.log('Env var in subsequent grunt task: ' + process.env.PROD) } );
grunt.registerTask('prod', ['env:dev', 'printEnv']);
};
Output of grunt prod
Running "env:dev" (env) task
Running "printEnv" task
Env var in subsequent grunt task: http://production.server
Done, without errors.

Dojo intern set firefox profile name

Hi Iam trying to set firefox profile name in environment settings of intern config file.I have tried
environments: [
{ browserName: 'firefox',firefox_profile:'default' },
{firefox_profile:'default'}
],
and
environments: [
{ browserName: 'firefox',profile:'default' },
{profile:'default'}
],
as well as
capabilities: {
'selenium-version': '2.42.0',
firefox_profile:'default'
},
as mentioned in Selenium capabilities
But still firefox launches with an anonymous profile.
However if I use watir,
def setup
#browser = Watir::Browser.new :firefox, :profile => 'default'
goto_ecp_console_manage_page
end
browser launches the default profile which is 'kinit-ed'(kerberos)
As the Selenium capabilities page you mention points out, the value of firefox_profile must be a Base64-encoded profile. Specifically, you ZIP up a Firefox profile directory, Base64 encode it, and use that string as the value of firefox_profile. The firefox-profile npm package can make this process easier. You'll end up with something like:
environments: [
{ browserName: 'firefox', firefox_profile: 'UEsDBBQACAAIACynEk...'; },
...
],
I would recommend storing the profile string in a separate module since it's going to be around 250kb.
I used #jason0x43 suggestion to rely on the firefox-profile Node.js module and I've created the following grunt task fireforProfile4selenium. With a simple configuration set into the Gruntfile.js, the plugin writes a file on disk with the Base64 encoded version of a zipped profile!
Here is the grunt configuration:
firefoxProfile4selenium: {
options: {
proxy: {
host: '...',
port: ...
},
bypass: [ 'localhost', '127.0.0.1', '...' ]
},
default: {
files: [{
dest: 'firefoxProfile.b64.txt'
}]
}
}
Here is the plugin:
/*global require, module*/
var fs = require('fs'),
FirefoxProfile = require('firefox-profile'),
taskName = 'firefoxProfile4selenium';
module.exports = function (grunt) {
'use strict';
grunt.registerMultiTask(taskName, 'Prepares a Firefox profile for Selenium', function () {
var done = this.async(),
firefoxProfile = new FirefoxProfile(),
options = this.options(),
host = this.options().proxy.host,
port = this.options().proxy.host,
bypass = this.options().bypass,
dest = this.files[0].dest;
// Set the configuration type for considering the custom settings
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.type', 2);
// Set the proxy host
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.ftp', host);
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.http', host);
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.socks', host);
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.ssl', host);
// Set the proxy port
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.ftp_port', port);
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.http_port', port);
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.socks_port', port);
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.ssl_port', port);
// Set the list of hosts that should bypass the proxy
firefoxProfile.setPreference('network.proxy.no_proxies_on', bypass.join(','));
firefoxProfile.encoded(function (zippedProfile) {
fs.writeFile(dest, zippedProfile, function (error) {
done(error); // FYI, done(null) reports a success, otherwise it's a failure
});
});
});
};

Calling grunt.config.set inside grunt.util.spawn doesn't seem to have any effect

I'm trying to set the current Git SHA in my project's Grunt configuration, but when I try to access it from another task it isn't available, What am I missing?
grunt.registerTask('sha', function () {
var done = this.async();
grunt.util.spawn({
cmd: 'git',
args: ['rev-parse', '--short', 'HEAD']
}, function (err, res) {
if (err) {
grunt.fail.fatal(err);
} else {
grunt.config.set('git', {sha: res.stdout});
if (grunt.option('debug') || grunt.option('verbose')) {
console.log("[sha]:", res.stdout);
}
}
done();
});
});
After running the task, I expect the config to be available in another task configuration:
requirejs: {
dist: {
...
out: '<%= app.dist %>/scripts/module_name.<%= git.sha %>.js'
...
}
}
So... What's the problem?
The problem is that Require JS is writing to the file public/scripts/module_name..js, the SHA is not available in the configuration (when the filename should be public/scripts/module_name.d34dc0d3.js).
UPDATE:
The problem is that I'm running requirejs tasks with grunt-concurrent, so the Grunt configuration is not available for requirejs.
grunt.registerTask('build', [
...
'getsha',
'concurrent:dist',
...
]);
And the concurrent task, looks like:
concurrent: {
dist: [
...
'requirejs',
...
]
}
Since grunt-concurrent will spawn tasks in child processes, they do not have access to the context of the parent process. Which is why doing grunt.config.set() within the parent context is not available in the config of the child context.
Some of the solutions to make the change available in the child context are:
Write the data to the file system
Write the data to a temporary file with grunt.file.write('./tmp/gitsha', res.stdout) and then have the task being ran in a child process read the temporary file:
out: (function() {
var out = grunt.config('app.dist') + '/scripts/module_name.';
if (grunt.file.exists('./tmp/gitsha')) {
out += grunt.file.read('./tmp/gitsha');
} else {
out += 'unknown';
}
return out + '.js';
}())
Use a socket
This is a very convoluted solution but a solution nonetheless. See the net node docs: http://nodejs.org/api/net.html#net_net_createserver_options_connectionlistener on creating a server on the parent process then have the child process connect to the socket for the data.
Or check out https://github.com/shama/blackbox for a library that makes this method a bit simpler.
Fork the parent process instead of spawn/exec
Another method is to use fork: http://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#child_process_child_process_fork_modulepath_args_options instead of grunt-concurrent. Fork lets you send messages to child processes with child.send('gitsha') and receive them in the child with process.on('message', function(gitsha) {})
This method also can get very convoluted.
Use a proxy task
Have your sha task set the config as you're currently doing:
grunt.registerTask('sha', function() {
grunt.config.set('git', { sha: '1234' });
});
Change your concurrent config to call a proxy task with the sha:
grunt.initConfig({
concurrent: {
dist: [
'proxy:requirejs:<%= git.sha %>'
]
}
});
Then create a proxy task that runs a task with setting the passed value first:
grunt.registerTask('proxy', function(task, gitsha) {
grunt.config.set('git', { sha: gitsha });
grunt.task.run(task);
});
The above can be simplified to set values specifically on requirejs but just shown here as a generic example that can be applied with any task.

Categories