I am trying to capture the arguments that are being passed to callback 'func' function. However, when I try to console log arguments inside my 'cache' function it doesn't give anything except the name of the callback function.
But when I add a secondary inner function, the logging works just fine and it lets me access the arguments received by the callback. I really want to understand how inner function can perform the task, but the outer function cannot.
function cache(func) {
console.log(arguments); //logs { '0': [Function: complexFunction] }
return function () {
console.log(arguments); //logs { '0': 'foo', '1': 'bar' }
}
}
var complexFunction = function(arg1, arg2) { return arg1 + arg2 };
var cachedFunction = cache(complexFunction);
console.log(cachedFunction('foo', 'bar')); // complex function should be executed
The inner function is a different function. When you call it (because it has been returned and assigned to cachedFunction), you pass it different arguments.
cachedFunction('foo', 'bar')
complex function should be executed
It isn't.
You never execute complexFunction.
You pass it as an argument to cache, and cache passes it (written in the arguments object) to console.log, but it never gets called.
If you want to call it, then you need to actually do that.
function cache(func) {
console.log(arguments); //logs { '0': [Function: complexFunction] }
return function () {
console.log(func.apply(null, arguments));
}
}
Related
Here are two callback function:
function callback_a(){
alert('a');
}
function callback_b(p){
alert('b says'+ p)'
}
If I want use callback_a
function test(callback){
if(condition){
callback();
}
}
test(callback_a);
But the function test isn't applicable to callback_b, So how to implement a common function that you can passing some callbacks function with multiple possible parameter lists.
There are three options:
The easiest way is to use spread operator:
function test(callback, ...callback_args) {
callback(...callback_args);
}
in this case the invocation of test for function callback_b would be like this:
test(callback_b,"b")
The second way is using arguments which are scoped to any function in JavaScript:
function test(callback) {
callback.apply(null, arguments.slice(1));
}
the invocation of test for function callback_b would be the same:
test(callback_b,"b")
Another options is to use partially applied functions. In this case you should define b_callback like this (ES6 syntax):
let callback_b = (p) => () => void{
alert('b says'+ p)'
}
or without ES6:
function callback_b(p) {
return function(){
alert('b says'+ p)'
}
}
and invoke it like this:
test(callback_b("b"))
There is a special object called arguments that gets created when a function is invoked. It's an array-like object that represents the arguments passed in to a function:
It can be used like this:
test();
// no arguments passed, but it still gets created:
// arguments.length = 0
// arguments >> []
test(a);
// ONE argument passed:
// arguments.length = 1
// arguments >> [a]
test(a,b,c,d);
// FOUR arguments passed:
// arguments.length = 4
// arguments >> [a,b,c,d]
Knowing this, one can call a callback with the rest of the arguments passed in from the parent function using apply like this:
function test(callback) {
callback.apply(null, Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1));
}
// arguments passed into test are available in the function scope when
// .slice is used here to only pass the portion of the arguments
// array relevant to the callback (i.e. any arguments minus the
// first argument which is the callback itself.)
//
// N.B. The arguments object isn't an array but an array like object so
// .slice isn't available on it directly, hence .call was used here)
Might be worth reading up on:
The arguments object
Function.prototype.apply, Function.prototype.call and Function.prototype.bind as they are way to bind a context and arguments to a function (i.e. they'll work with the arguments object to call a function where you may not know how many arguments will be passed)
So how to implement a common function that you can passing some callbacks function with multiple possible parameter lists.
Basically, you don't. The function receiving the callback is in charge of what the callback receives as arguments. When you call Array#forEach, it's Array#forEach that decides what arguments your callback gets. Similarly, String#replace defines what it will call its callback with.
Your job is to say what test will do, what it will call its callback with. Then it's the job of the person using test to write their callback appropriately. For instance: You might document test as calling the callback with no arguments. If the caller wants to use callback_b, then it's up to them to handle the fact that callback_b expects a parameter. There are several ways they can do that:
The could wrap it in another function:
test(function() {
callback_b("appropriate value here");
});
...or use Function#bind
test(callback_b.bind(null, "appropriate value here"));
...but it's their problem, not yours.
Side note: If they pass you callback_b and you call it without any arguments, you won't get an error. JavaScript allows you to call a function with fewer arguments than it expects, or more. How the function handles that is up to the author of the function.
You can pass an anonymous function as the callback that will itself return your desired callback function with parameters.
test(function() { return callback_b(' how are you'); });
see this working snippet that will first use callback_a, then callback_b (with parameter) as the callback:
function callback_a(){
alert('a');
}
function callback_b(p){
alert('b says'+ p);
}
function test(callback){
if(true){
callback();
}
}
test(callback_a);
test(function() { return callback_b(' how are you'); });
You can pass the parameter while calling the callback
function test(callback){
if(condition){
callback();
}
else if(other condition){
callback("b");
}
}
test(callback_b);
You can write your callback function like
function callback_a_b(){
if(arguments.length){
var arg = [].slice.call(arguments);
alert('b says'+ arg[0])
}
else{
alert('a');
}
}
You can pass array of parameters as second param of test function or in ES6 use spread operator read more here
function test(callback, params){
if(condition){
if (params === undefined){
callback();
} else {
callback.apply(null, params); //params must be array
//ES6: callback(...params);
}
}
}
test(callback_a);
test(callback_b, [" whatever"]);
I've just checked in my browser (ffox 51.0.1) that the following works:
function test(callback,other_args){if(condition){callback(other_args);}}
results:
condition=true
test(callback_a)
=> shows the alert with 'a'
condition=false
test(callback_a)
=> doesn't show anything
condition=true
test(callback_b,"pepe")
=> shows the alert with 'b sayspepe'
condition=false
test(callback_b,"pepe")
=> doesn't show anything
I originally come from the Java Programming language, and I was just wondering why it is possible in javascript to pass a callback function as a variable or plain object (without parameters) to another function, and then use this callback function inside of another function but this time with parameters to pass.
And how exactly is this callback returning my user object, as I did not specify a return function inside callback(user), or specify any function body at all for my callback. Is this done inside the setTimeout(()...) function as the timeoutHandler implementation is implicitly returning something?
var getUser = (id,callback) => {
var user = {
id: id,
name: 'Vikram'
};
setTimeout(() => {
callback(user);
},3000);
};
getUser(31, (userObject) => {
console.log(userObject);
});
I see two questions here:
why it is possible in javascript to pass a callback function as a variable or plain object (without parameters) to another function.
Because functions are first-class objects, we can pass a function as an argument in another function and later execute that passed-in function or even return it to be executed later.
Read more here: https://javascriptissexy.com/understand-javascript-callback-functions-and-use-them/
Below shows functions are just objects as well:
function hello() {
return 'hello';
}
hello.other = 'world';
console.log(hello() + ', ' + hello.other);
how exactly is this callback returning my user object, as I did not specify a return function inside callback(user), or specify any function body at all for my callback.
setTimeout(()...) function is not implicitly returning anything, it just registers a function, that would execute later. When the function registered by the setTimeout triggers, it invokes the callback(user) and that resolves getUser registered function which logs to the console. Remember callbacks are asynchronous.
Functions have implicit returns if not specified, which returns undefined, meaning you did not explicitly return.
Below shows an example:
function hello() {
console.log('Hello, World');
}
console.log(hello()); // undefined.
function hi() {
return 'Hi, World';
}
console.log(hi()); // Hi, World.
The function i.e callback is passed as reference here. So you can pass it as much you want, when you call it then you can pass on the arguments and it will refer to original function.
And also it's not returning the user object, it's just consoling out the user object. As you have not used any return it will return undefined. Try consoling the callback fn return out.
var getUser = (id,callback) => {
var user = {
id: id,
name: 'Vikram'
};
setTimeout(() => {
console.log(callback(user), 'return value of callback');
},3000);
};
In javascript function is a object.
It behaves like function only with ()
So you can pass function to another function or variable as value.
Some functions in javascript are asynchronous.
setTimeout is such async function. It means callback function will be run after a time.
What's happening:
//assign anonymous function to variable
// until function without () it only a object
var getUser = (id,callback) => {
//set up params
var user = {
id: id,
name: 'Vikram'
};
// setup asynchronous function setTimeout
setTimeout(() => {
// run callback with params when time would done
callback(user);
},3000);
};
// call function which contains in getUser-variable and pass 2 params: int and callback-function
getUser(31, (userObject) => {
console.log(userObject);
});
I'm trying to access arguments from the function that is being passed as a parameter to make sure to pass those through, however I'm getting the error:
TypeError: 'caller', 'callee', and 'arguments' properties may not be accessed on strict mode functions or the arguments objects for calls to them
How can I get the arguments for func so that I can pass the message through when calling it?
UPDATE: maybe a better question is why can't I log func.arguments?
function a(func){
console.log(func.arguments)
return function(){
func.apply(null, func.arguments);
}
}
function log(message){
console.log(message)
}
a(log.bind('hello'))()
It can be done but its not pretty. you have to return an object with the parameters you want from the function you are passing
function a(func){
console.log(func.arguments)
//you dont actually need this since you have already called the function before passing
//return function(){
// func.apply(null, func.arguments);
//}
}
function log(message){
console.log(message);
return {
arguments : arguments //store the arguments and return them
};
}
//you not actually passing the function here (the way you have it written)
//you are calling it and returning its value
//we return { arguments: arguments } so the "a" function can retrieve its properties.
a(log("hello"));
I guess what you're trying to do is to intercept a function with a "logging" function.
If so, there is a different approach, using ES6 rest params --
let withLog = func => (...args) => {
console.log(...args);
return func(...args);
};
let add = (x, y) => x + y;
withLog(add)(2, 3); // outputs '2 3', returns 5
I see a lot of javascript code that passes a function as a parameter that returns an anonymous object.
myFunction(function() {
return {
foo: 'bar'
};
});
What is the advantage or the purpose of using this instead of simply passing directly an anonymous object?
myFunction({
foo: 'bar'
});
The difference is that if you alter the argument passed in your second code snippet, there is no way to get the original argument again.
If you pass an function instead you can call the function more than once and get always the same argument back. (if the function is implemented this way)
Furthermore if you use a function you can do additional stuff like logging how often your function / argument was called or so on. So using a function adds more flexibility for the user of the function.
For the developer of the function on the other hand accepting a function as argument can cause the tiny problem that a function doesn´t have to return the same value every time you call it - myFunc() == myFunc() COULD return false, therefore i would not recommend handing over a function if it is supposed to JUST return an argument.
Backbone uses have a lot of places where they will initialize the function if passed to get the value, eg.
Backbone.Model.extend({
url: function() { return 'myurl.aspx'; }
});
// VS
Backbone.Model.extend({
url: 'myurl.aspx'
});
This is clever if you will have to make some calculation / run some conditions before you'ill know that the url is.
Backbone.Model.extend({
url: function() {
if ( this.get('name') ) {
return 'service1.aspx';
}
else {
return 'service2.aspx';
}
}
});
Your first example sends an anonymous function as the first argument to myFunction while the second example sends an object as the first argument.
myFunction(function() {
return {
foo: 'bar'
};
}); // function() {...}
myFunction({
foo: 'bar'
}); // {foo: 'bar'}
function myFunction(what) {
console.log(what);
}
If you are talking about closures, the main difference is that you can have private variables inside closures:
var setGet = (function() {
var v = null;
return {
get: function() { return v; },
get: function(val) { v=val; },
};
});
// VS:
var setGet = {
v: null,
get: function() { return this.v; },
get: function(val) { this.v; },
};
In the first example you can't access the variable v without using .get/.set on setGet while in the 2. example i can simple change it by setting setGet.v = 'new_val';
In the first example You are passing a callback function.
When we pass a callback function as an argument to another function,
we are only passing the function definition. We are not executing the function
in the parameter.
And since the containing function has the callback function in its parameter as a function definition, it can execute the callback anytime. This allows us to execute the callback functions at any point in the containing function.
A simple example for this is jQuery click binding :
/The anonymous function is not being executed there in the parameter.
//The anonymous function is a callback function
$("#btn_1").click(function() {
alert("Btn 1 Clicked");
});
But in the second example you are simply passing an object to the called function.
Use this link to get more details about Callback functions. Enjoy :)
I think, it really depends where you saw the code being used.
In this case, myFunction seems to require you to pass a function rather than an Object.
But in general, Consider this
myFunction(function() {
var a = "bar";
return {
foo: a
};
});
and this:
var a = "bar"
myFunction({
foo: a
});
In the second case, anyone outside is able to access a. But in first case, a becomes similar to a private variable which is exposed as public by the function. So you might observe this in places where people wish to follow OOP concepts in the otherwise classless JS.
Another case is where you require a callback function or some function that is to be called later. So if the data is to be preserved until a certain something is over you can make it available as the return value of a function, rather than storing it globally...
I have a custom object that implements a function that'll be executed later. Here's how someone would call it:
customObject.onSomething(function(e) {
// do something with e
console.log('foobar');
});
Here's how onSomething is getting created:
var CustomObject = function() {
this.onSomething = function(callback) {
// If the user passes in parameter(s), how can I modify them before calling?
callback.apply(this);
}
}
How can I modify the argument(s) the user passed in before performing apply or call on the function?
apply takes a second parameter which is a list of arguments to pass to the function. call does the same, except it passes its own argument-list (everything after the first parameter which is used as this).
So, if you know which parameters you expect, you can just add them to the invoking function as the second parameter to apply (or as a list of parameters to call):
this.onSomething = function(arg1, arg2) {
// reverse the first and second arguments
callback.apply(this, [arg2, arg1]);
// equivalent:
callback.call(this, arg2, arg1);
};
If you don't know what kind of arguments to expect, but you still want to do something with them, you can do so with the builtin arguments pseudo-array which holds the arguments given to the current function (even when you don't declare them explicitly).
You can use this to invoke the callback with the same arguments given to the invoking function, or some transformation of them; e.g.:
this.onSomething = function() {
// call callback with the same arguments we got
callback.apply(this, arguments);
// or, make some changes
var newArgs = ["extra argument", arguments[1], arguments[0]];
callback.apply(this, newArgs);
};
Sounds like what you're asking for is fairly simple, see below:
var CustomObject = function() {
this.onSomething = function(callback, param1, param2) {
param1 += 4;
param2 = 'Something about ' + param2 + ' is different...';
callback.apply(this, [param1, param2]);
}
}