I have a React component which renders a table of data from its props. The data is wrapped in MobX's observable(). From time to time, an asynchronous operation (AJAX call) adds a new row to the data source, which should cause a new table row to render. This is not the case.
A minimal example of the component in question is below:
#observer
class MyDashboard extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<Table
columns={this.props.columns}
dataSource={this.props.model.contentTypes}
/>
);
}
#action.bound
private onThingHappened = async () => {
const thing = await asyncThing();
runInAction('onThingHappened', () => {
this.props.model.contentTypes.push(thing);
});
}
}
The prop model is an observable object. model.contentTypes is an array of objects. The table renders correctly on the first draw; it's subsequent re-renders which are problematic.
The bound action onThingHappened works as expected if the await is removed. To put it differently - model changes which occur before the first await trigger re-renders as expected.
The runInAction does not seem to noticably change anything.
However, if I draw model.contentTypes in the component itself - rather than simply passing it down to a child component (<Table> in this case), the entire thing works as expected. For example:
return (
<React.Fragment>
<div style={{display: 'none'}}>{this.props.model.contentTypes.length}</div>
<Table
columns={this.props.columns}
dataSource={this.props.model.contentTypes}
/>
</React.Fragment>
)
In this render function, dereferencing the model.contentTypes array seems to be enough to trigger the re-render in onThingHappened, even after an await.
I don't use mobx but after some research:
wrapping <Table/> in observer() should work ... if <Table/> render uses the value directly, it can fail if passed to (unwrapped) subcomponent;
'Mobx traces access' then probably it's enough to force mobx to react by 'unnecessary' access.
Try sth like:
render() {
const amount = this.props.model.contentTypes.length;
if( !amount ) return null; // to avoid 'amount unused, no unused ...'
return (
<Table
columns={this.props.columns}
dataSource={this.props.model.contentTypes}
/>
);
}
I want to get a list of all child elements of a react component.
For example:
Parent.js
<Parent>
<SomeComponent/>
</Parent>
SomeComponent.js
<SomeComponent>
<ChildElement1/>
<ClhidElement2/>
</SomeComponent>
So in Parent.js I want to get ChildElement1 and ChildElement2.
Is that possible?
My Use case is:
I'm passing form fields (Field component) to a generic Form component. The Form element receives an object of default values and also other things (what CRUD/resource it is related to for example). And it must inject these values in the Fields. Instead of passing all fields one by one and avoid repetion I created containers like "UserFields" and a few others and they are the ones that have the Fields components. So I need Form to read the Fields in UserFields. But since the fields are already inside UserFields, I can't figure out how to get them.
React is designed to be unidirectional data flow and following Flux architecture, and hence to keep best practices, it's always top down (from parent to child, not bidirectional).
However, you can achieve them in several options such as implementing React with redux or React Context
I am considering that your child components are mapped from array inside <SomeComponent />
Try this inside your parent
state = {
child: []
}
renderChildren = () => {
if(this.state.child.length > 0) {
return this.state.child.map(e => {
return (
<div>{e}</div>
)
})
}
}
returnChild = (data) => {
var child = [];
for(var i = 0; i < data.length; i++) {
child.push(data[i])
}
this.setState(prevState => ({child: [...prevState.child, child]}));
}
return (
<div>
<SomeComponent returnChild={(child) => this.returnChild(child)} />
{this.renderChildren()}
</div>
)
Add this method to your <SomeComponent /> component like this along with other code.
onGettingMoreChild = (child) => {
this.props.returnChild(child)
}
Don't forget to call onGettingMoreChild whenever there is a new child created.
I have not tested this code. Please playaround with it if needed. Also, remember to pass in your entire view as child to the method onGettingMoreChild
Example of child variable passed to onGettingMoreChild is
<div>I am child one!!</div>
So I am using a hash to store the values of dynamically created rows of input values and I lose focus on the input I am modifying after entering only one character. I think the solution to this may be to use refs to refocus on only the last input changed, but I couldn't get it to work, as I wasn't able to figure out how to specify which element was last changed. Advice on how to solve this is appreciated.
The code below dynamically creates input boxes, and looks up their values based on the unitPriceValueHash. Each variant has an id, and id is used as the key to the hash.
I created a codepen to try and recreate the problem, but the issue im facing doesn't show up in code pen. In my actual app I press 1 for example in the input box, then the cursor is not on the input box anymore.
https://codepen.io/ByteSize/pen/oogLpE?editors=1011
The only difference between the codepen and my code appears to be the fact the the inputs are nested inside a table.
CreateItem(variant) {
const unitPriceValueHash = this.props.unitPriceValueHash
return {
variant_title: variant.variant_title,
variant_price: variant.variant_price,
unit_cost: <TextField
type="number"
onChange={(event) => this.handleUnitPriceChange(variant.id, event)}
key={variant.id}
value={unitPriceValueHash[variant.id] || ''}
/>
};
}
Below is the change of state that modifies the hash
handleUnitPriceChange (id, event) {
const unitPriceValueHash = this.state.unitPriceValueHash
unitPriceValueHash[id] = event
console.log(unitPriceValueHash)
this.setState({unitPriceValueHash: unitPriceValueHash});
//this.updateVariantUnitCost(id, event);
}
There's a couple problems with the code you've shared.
Don't use inline functions. Each render, the function is created again which means that when react compares the props, it looks like the function is different (it is a new/different function each time!) and react will re-render.
Don't modify any objects which exist in the state, instead create a new object. If you modify an object that exists in the state, you're essentially saying you don't want renders to be consistent and reproducible.
I've re-posted your original code with the issues highlighted
CreateItem(variant) {
const unitPriceValueHash = this.props.unitPriceValueHash
return {
variant_title: variant.variant_title,
variant_price: variant.variant_price,
unit_cost: <TextField
type="number"
onChange={(event) => this.handleUnitPriceChange(variant.id, event)}
// ^^^^ - inline functions cause react to re-render every time, instead - create a component
key={variant.id}
value={unitPriceValueHash[variant.id] || ''}
/>
};
}
handleUnitPriceChange(id, event) {
const unitPriceValueHash = this.state.unitPriceValueHash
unitPriceValueHash[id] = event
// ^^^^ - please, please - don't do this. You can't mutate the state like this.
// instead, do the following to create a new modified object without modifying the object in the state
const unitPriceValueHash = Object.assign({}, this.state.unitPriceValueHash, { id: event });
this.setState({ unitPriceValueHash: unitPriceValueHash });
}
In regards to the inline-function, generally the recommendation is to create a new component for this which takes the value as a prop. That might look like this:
class UnitCost extends PureComponent {
static propTypes = {
variantId: PropTypes.number,
variantValue: PropTypes.object,
onUnitPriceChange: PropTypes.func,
}
handleUnitPriceChange(e) {
this.props.onUnitPriceChange(this.props.variantId, e)
}
render() {
return (
<TextField
type="number"
onChange={this.handleUnitPriceChange}
value={this.props.variantValue || ''}
/>
);
}
}
CreateItem(variant) {
const unitPriceValueHash = this.props.unitPriceValueHash
return {
variant_title: variant.variant_title,
variant_price: variant.variant_price,
unit_cost: (
<UnitCost
key={variant.id}
variantId={variant.id}
variantValue={unitPriceValueHash[variant.id]}
onUnitPriceChange={this.handleUnitPriceChange}
/>
),
};
}
Regarding your concerns about focus, react generally won't lose your object focus when re-rendering, so don't ever, ever re-focus an object after an update for this reason.
The only time react will lose focus, is if it completely discards the current DOM tree and starts over from scratch. It will do this if it thinks a parent object has been replaced instead of modified. This can happen because of a missing key prop, or a key prop that has changed.
You have not posted enough code for us to investigate this further. If you want more help you should build a minimum reproducible example that we can run and test.
The solution to this problem had me use an intermediate state to store the value of the input field on change, and a submit AJAX request on an onBlur
class TextFieldWrapper extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
value: this.props.variantValue[this.props.variantId] || '',
}
this.handleUnitPriceChange = this.handleUnitPriceChange.bind(this)
this.updateValue = this.updateValue.bind(this)
}
updateValue(value){
this.setState({
value: value,
});
}
handleUnitPriceChange() {
this.props.onUnitPriceChange(this.props.variantId, this.state.value);
}
render(){
return (
<TextField
type="number"
id={this.props.variantId}
key={this.props.variantId}
onChange={this.updateValue}
onBlur={this.handleUnitPriceChange}
value={this.state.value}
/>
);
}
}
I want to render an array of html elements in my component. The reason for storing the data/html in an array is because I want to be able to dynamically load a new element depending on a button-click.
This is how I want to display my array:
<div>
{this.state.steps}
</div>
This is how I initiate my component and array:
componentDidMount() {
this.createProcessStep().then(step => {
this.setState({steps: this.state.steps.concat(step)});
});
}
export function createProcessStep() {
this.setState({processStepCounter: this.state.processStepCounter += 1});
return this.addStepToArray().then(d => {
return this.reallyCreateProcessStep()
});
}
addStepToArray = () => {
const step = {
...Some variables...
};
return new Promise(resolve => {
this.setState({
stepsData: this.state.stepsData.concat(step)
}, resolve)
});
};
"stepsData" is another array that holds data (variables) belonging to each step. "steps" on the other hand, should only hold the html.
This is how one step/element looks like:
<div>
...Some Content...
<button label="+" onClick={ () => {
this.createProcessStep().then(step => {
this.setState({
steps: this.state.steps.concat(step)
});
})
}}/>
...other content...
</div>
This button within each step is responsible for loading/adding yet another step to the array, which actually works. My component displays each step properly, however react doesn't properly render changes to the element/step, which is
to say that, whenever e.g. I change a value of an input field, react doesn't render those changes. So I can actually click on the "+"-button that will render the new html element but whenever a change to this element occurs,
react simply ignores the phenotype of said change. Keeping in mind that the changeHandlers for those steps/elements still work. I can change inputfields, radioButtons, checkboxes etc. which will do exactly what it's
supposed to, however the "re-rendering" (or whatever it is) doesn't work.
Any ideas of what I'm doing wrong here? Thanks!
While you could certainly beat your approach into working, I would advise that you take more common react approach.
You make your components to correctly display themselves from the state . ie as many steps are in the state, your component will display. Than make your add button add necessary information (information, not formated html) to the state.
Here is an example how to use component N times:
const MyRepeatedlyOccuringComponent = (n) => (<p key={n}>There goes Camel {n}</p>)
const App = () => {
const camels = [1,22,333,4444,55555]
const caravan = camels.map((n) => MyRepeatedlyOccuringComponent(n))
return(<div>{caravan}</div>
}
Is there not a simple way to pass a child's props to its parent using events, in React.js?
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function() {
<a onClick={this.props.onClick}>Click me</a>
}
});
var Parent = React.createClass({
onClick: function(event) {
// event.component.props ?why is this not available?
},
render: function() {
<Child onClick={this.onClick} />
}
});
I know you can use controlled components to pass an input's value but it'd be nice to pass the whole kit n' kaboodle. Sometimes the child component contains a set of information you'd rather not have to look up.
Perhaps there's a way to bind the component to the event?
UPDATE – 9/1/2015
After using React for over a year, and spurred on by Sebastien Lorber's answer, I've concluded passing child components as arguments to functions in parents is not in fact the React way, nor was it ever a good idea. I've switched the answer.
Edit: see the end examples for ES6 updated examples.
This answer simply handle the case of direct parent-child relationship. When parent and child have potentially a lot of intermediaries, check this answer.
Other solutions are missing the point
While they still work fine, other answers are missing something very important.
Is there not a simple way to pass a child's props to its parent using events, in React.js?
The parent already has that child prop!: if the child has a prop, then it is because its parent provided that prop to the child! Why do you want the child to pass back the prop to the parent, while the parent obviously already has that prop?
Better implementation
Child: it really does not have to be more complicated than that.
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <button onClick={this.props.onClick}>{this.props.text}</button>;
},
});
Parent with single child: using the value it passes to the child
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {childText: "Click me! (parent prop)"};
},
render: function () {
return (
<Child onClick={this.handleChildClick} text={this.state.childText}/>
);
},
handleChildClick: function(event) {
// You can access the prop you pass to the children
// because you already have it!
// Here you have it in state but it could also be
// in props, coming from another parent.
alert("The Child button text is: " + this.state.childText);
// You can also access the target of the click here
// if you want to do some magic stuff
alert("The Child HTML is: " + event.target.outerHTML);
}
});
JsFiddle
Parent with list of children: you still have everything you need on the parent and don't need to make the child more complicated.
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {childrenData: [
{childText: "Click me 1!", childNumber: 1},
{childText: "Click me 2!", childNumber: 2}
]};
},
render: function () {
var children = this.state.childrenData.map(function(childData,childIndex) {
return <Child onClick={this.handleChildClick.bind(null,childData)} text={childData.childText}/>;
}.bind(this));
return <div>{children}</div>;
},
handleChildClick: function(childData,event) {
alert("The Child button data is: " + childData.childText + " - " + childData.childNumber);
alert("The Child HTML is: " + event.target.outerHTML);
}
});
JsFiddle
It is also possible to use this.handleChildClick.bind(null,childIndex) and then use this.state.childrenData[childIndex]
Note we are binding with a null context because otherwise React issues a warning related to its autobinding system. Using null means you don't want to change the function context. See also.
About encapsulation and coupling in other answers
This is for me a bad idea in term of coupling and encapsulation:
var Parent = React.createClass({
handleClick: function(childComponent) {
// using childComponent.props
// using childComponent.refs.button
// or anything else using childComponent
},
render: function() {
<Child onClick={this.handleClick} />
}
});
Using props:
As I explained above, you already have the props in the parent so it's useless to pass the whole child component to access props.
Using refs:
You already have the click target in the event, and in most case this is enough.
Additionnally, you could have used a ref directly on the child:
<Child ref="theChild" .../>
And access the DOM node in the parent with
React.findDOMNode(this.refs.theChild)
For more advanced cases where you want to access multiple refs of the child in the parent, the child could pass all the dom nodes directly in the callback.
The component has an interface (props) and the parent should not assume anything about the inner working of the child, including its inner DOM structure or which DOM nodes it declares refs for. A parent using a ref of a child means that you tightly couple the 2 components.
To illustrate the issue, I'll take this quote about the Shadow DOM, that is used inside browsers to render things like sliders, scrollbars, video players...:
They created a boundary between what you, the Web developer can reach
and what’s considered implementation details, thus inaccessible to
you. The browser however, can traipse across this boundary at will.
With this boundary in place, they were able to build all HTML elements
using the same good-old Web technologies, out of the divs and spans
just like you would.
The problem is that if you let the child implementation details leak into the parent, you make it very hard to refactor the child without affecting the parent. This means as a library author (or as a browser editor with Shadow DOM) this is very dangerous because you let the client access too much, making it very hard to upgrade code without breaking retrocompatibility.
If Chrome had implemented its scrollbar letting the client access the inner dom nodes of that scrollbar, this means that the client may have the possibility to simply break that scrollbar, and that apps would break more easily when Chrome perform its auto-update after refactoring the scrollbar... Instead, they only give access to some safe things like customizing some parts of the scrollbar with CSS.
About using anything else
Passing the whole component in the callback is dangerous and may lead novice developers to do very weird things like calling childComponent.setState(...) or childComponent.forceUpdate(), or assigning it new variables, inside the parent, making the whole app much harder to reason about.
Edit: ES6 examples
As many people now use ES6, here are the same examples for ES6 syntax
The child can be very simple:
const Child = ({
onClick,
text
}) => (
<button onClick={onClick}>
{text}
</button>
)
The parent can be either a class (and it can eventually manage the state itself, but I'm passing it as props here:
class Parent1 extends React.Component {
handleChildClick(childData,event) {
alert("The Child button data is: " + childData.childText + " - " + childData.childNumber);
alert("The Child HTML is: " + event.target.outerHTML);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.childrenData.map(child => (
<Child
key={child.childNumber}
text={child.childText}
onClick={e => this.handleChildClick(child,e)}
/>
))}
</div>
);
}
}
But it can also be simplified if it does not need to manage state:
const Parent2 = ({childrenData}) => (
<div>
{childrenData.map(child => (
<Child
key={child.childNumber}
text={child.childText}
onClick={e => {
alert("The Child button data is: " + child.childText + " - " + child.childNumber);
alert("The Child HTML is: " + e.target.outerHTML);
}}
/>
))}
</div>
)
JsFiddle
PERF WARNING (apply to ES5/ES6): if you are using PureComponent or shouldComponentUpdate, the above implementations will not be optimized by default because using onClick={e => doSomething()}, or binding directly during the render phase, because it will create a new function everytime the parent renders. If this is a perf bottleneck in your app, you can pass the data to the children, and reinject it inside "stable" callback (set on the parent class, and binded to this in class constructor) so that PureComponent optimization can kick in, or you can implement your own shouldComponentUpdate and ignore the callback in the props comparison check.
You can also use Recompose library, which provide higher order components to achieve fine-tuned optimisations:
// A component that is expensive to render
const ExpensiveComponent = ({ propA, propB }) => {...}
// Optimized version of same component, using shallow comparison of props
// Same effect as React's PureRenderMixin
const OptimizedComponent = pure(ExpensiveComponent)
// Even more optimized: only updates if specific prop keys have changed
const HyperOptimizedComponent = onlyUpdateForKeys(['propA', 'propB'])(ExpensiveComponent)
In this case you could optimize the Child component by using:
const OptimizedChild = onlyUpdateForKeys(['text'])(Child)
Update (9/1/15): The OP has made this question a bit of a moving target. It’s been updated again. So, I feel responsible to update my reply.
First, an answer to your provided example:
Yes, this is possible.
You can solve this by updating Child’s onClick to be this.props.onClick.bind(null, this):
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <a onClick={this.props.onClick.bind(null, this)}>Click me</a>;
}
});
The event handler in your Parent can then access the component and event like so:
onClick: function (component, event) {
// console.log(component, event);
},
JSBin snapshot
But the question itself is misleading
Parent already knows Child’s props.
This isn’t clear in the provided example because no props are actually being provided. This sample code might better support the question being asked:
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <a onClick={this.props.onClick}> {this.props.text} </a>;
}
});
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return { text: "Click here" };
},
onClick: function (event) {
// event.component.props ?why is this not available?
},
render: function() {
return <Child onClick={this.onClick} text={this.state.text} />;
}
});
It becomes much clearer in this example that you already know what the props of Child are.
JSBin snapshot
If it’s truly about using a Child’s props…
If it’s truly about using a Child’s props, you can avoid any hookup with Child altogether.
JSX has a spread attributes API I often use on components like Child. It takes all the props and applies them to a component. Child would look like this:
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <a {...this.props}> {this.props.text} </a>;
}
});
Allowing you to use the values directly in the Parent:
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return { text: "Click here" };
},
onClick: function (text) {
alert(text);
},
render: function() {
return <Child onClick={this.onClick.bind(null, this.state.text)} text={this.state.text} />;
}
});
JSBin snapshot
And there's no additional configuration required as you hookup additional Child components
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return {
text: "Click here",
text2: "No, Click here",
};
},
onClick: function (text) {
alert(text);
},
render: function() {
return <div>
<Child onClick={this.onClick.bind(null, this.state.text)} text={this.state.text} />
<Child onClick={this.onClick.bind(null, this.state.text2)} text={this.state.text2} />
</div>;
}
});
JSBin snapshot
But I suspect that’s not your actual use case. So let’s dig further…
A robust practical example
The generic nature of the provided example is a hard to talk about. I’ve created a component that demonstrations a practical use for the question above, implemented in a very Reacty way:
DTServiceCalculator working example
DTServiceCalculator repo
This component is a simple service calculator. You provide it with a list of services (with names and prices) and it will calculate a total the selected prices.
Children are blissfully ignorant
ServiceItem is the child-component in this example. It doesn’t have many opinions about the outside world. It requires a few props, one of which is a function to be called when clicked.
<div onClick={this.props.handleClick.bind(this.props.index)} />
It does nothing but to call the provided handleClick callback with the provided index[source].
Parents are Children
DTServicesCalculator is the parent-component is this example. It’s also a child. Let’s look.
DTServiceCalculator creates a list of child-component (ServiceItems) and provides them with props [source]. It’s the parent-component of ServiceItem but it`s the child-component of the component passing it the list. It doesn't own the data. So it again delegates handling of the component to its parent-component source
<ServiceItem chosen={chosen} index={i} key={id} price={price} name={name} onSelect={this.props.handleServiceItem} />
handleServiceItem captures the index, passed from the child, and provides it to its parent [source]
handleServiceClick (index) {
this.props.onSelect(index);
}
Owners know everything
The concept of “Ownership” is an important one in React. I recommend reading more about it here.
In the example I’ve shown, I keep delegating handling of an event up the component tree until we get to the component that owns the state.
When we finally get there, we handle the state selection/deselection like so [source]:
handleSelect (index) {
let services = […this.state.services];
services[index].chosen = (services[index].chosen) ? false : true;
this.setState({ services: services });
}
Conclusion
Try keeping your outer-most components as opaque as possible. Strive to make sure that they have very few preferences about how a parent-component might choose to implement them.
Keep aware of who owns the data you are manipulating. In most cases, you will need to delegate event handling up the tree to the component that owns that state.
Aside: The Flux pattern is a good way to reduce this type of necessary hookup in apps.
It appears there's a simple answer. Consider this:
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function() {
<a onClick={this.props.onClick.bind(null, this)}>Click me</a>
}
});
var Parent = React.createClass({
onClick: function(component, event) {
component.props // #=> {Object...}
},
render: function() {
<Child onClick={this.onClick} />
}
});
The key is calling bind(null, this) on the this.props.onClick event, passed from the parent. Now, the onClick function accepts arguments component, AND event. I think that's the best of all worlds.
UPDATE: 9/1/2015
This was a bad idea: letting child implementation details leak in to the parent was never a good path. See Sebastien Lorber's answer.
The question is how to pass argument from child to parent component. This example is easy to use and tested:
//Child component
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
var handleToUpdate = this.props.handleToUpdate;
return (<div><button onClick={() => handleToUpdate('someVar')}>Push me</button></div>
)
}
}
//Parent component
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate.bind(this);
}
handleToUpdate(someArg){
alert('We pass argument from Child to Parent: \n' + someArg);
}
render() {
var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate;
return (<div>
<Child handleToUpdate = {handleToUpdate.bind(this)} />
</div>)
}
}
if(document.querySelector("#demo")){
ReactDOM.render(
<Parent />,
document.querySelector("#demo")
);
}
Look at JSFIDDLE
Basically you use props to send information to and from Child and Parent.
Adding to all the wonderful answers, let me give a simple example that explains passing values from child to parent component in React
App.js
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(){
super();
this.handleFilterUpdate = this.handleFilterUpdate.bind(this);
this.state={name:'igi'}
}
handleFilterUpdate(filterValue) {
this.setState({
name: filterValue
});
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Header change={this.handleFilterUpdate} name={this.state.name} />
<p>{this.state.name}</p>
</div>
);
}
}
Header.js
class Header extends React.Component {
constructor(){
super();
this.state={
names: 'jessy'
}
}
Change(event) {
// this.props.change(this.state.names);
this.props.change('jessy');
}
render() {
return (
<button onClick={this.Change.bind(this)}>click</button>
);
}
}
Main.js
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import App from './App.jsx';
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('app'));
Thats it , now you can pass values from your client to the server.
Take a look at the Change function in the Header.js
Change(event) {
// this.props.change(this.state.names);
this.props.change('jessy');
}
This is how you push values into the props from client to the server
Here is a simple 3 step ES6 implementation using function binding in the parent constructor. This is the first way the official react tutorial recommends (there is also public class fields syntax not covered here). You can find all of this information here https://reactjs.org/docs/handling-events.html
Binding Parent Functions so Children Can Call Them (And pass data up to the parent! :D )
Make sure in the parent constructor you bind the function you created in the parent
Pass the bound function down to the child as a prop (No lambda because we are passing a ref to function)
Call the bound function from a child event (Lambda! We're calling the function when the event is fired.
If we don't do this the function will automatically run on load and not be triggered on the event.)
Parent Function
handleFilterApply(filterVals){}
Parent Constructor
this.handleFilterApply = this.handleFilterApply.bind(this);
Prop Passed to Child
onApplyClick = {this.handleFilterApply}
Child Event Call
onClick = {() => {props.onApplyClick(filterVals)}
This is an example without using the onClick event. I simply pass a callback function to the child by props. With that callback the child call also send data back. I was inspired by the examples in the docs.
Small example (this is in a tsx files, so props and states must be declared fully, I deleted some logic out of the components, so it is less code).
*Update: Important is to bind this to the callback, otherwise the callback has the scope of the child and not the parent. Only problem: it is the "old" parent...
SymptomChoser is the parent:
interface SymptomChooserState {
// true when a symptom was pressed can now add more detail
isInDetailMode: boolean
// since when user has this symptoms
sinceDate: Date,
}
class SymptomChooser extends Component<{}, SymptomChooserState> {
state = {
isInDetailMode: false,
sinceDate: new Date()
}
helloParent(symptom: Symptom) {
console.log("This is parent of: ", symptom.props.name);
// TODO enable detail mode
}
render() {
return (
<View>
<Symptom name='Fieber' callback={this.helloParent.bind(this)} />
</View>
);
}
}
Symptom is the child (in the props of the child I declared the callback function, in the function selectedSymptom the callback is called):
interface SymptomProps {
// name of the symptom
name: string,
// callback to notify SymptomChooser about selected Symptom.
callback: (symptom: Symptom) => void
}
class Symptom extends Component<SymptomProps, SymptomState>{
state = {
isSelected: false,
severity: 0
}
selectedSymptom() {
this.setState({ isSelected: true });
this.props.callback(this);
}
render() {
return (
// symptom is not selected
<Button
style={[AppStyle.button]}
onPress={this.selectedSymptom.bind(this)}>
<Text style={[AppStyle.textButton]}>{this.props.name}</Text>
</Button>
);
}
}