Trying to build something up but getting stuck and missing whatever the error is here. I want to track button clicks but get the value from the #zip input so thats why I chose mapTo. When I remove mapTo I can track clicks and change my statement in the subscribe function to update the result div text with the contents of the #zip input (exactly as I am doing in mapTo) which confuses me because I think that shows the syntax is ok.
Rx.Observable.fromEvent(document.getElementById('btn'),'click')
.mapTo($('#zip').val())
.subscribe(function(zipCode){
$('#result').text(zipCode);
});
jsbin
If I understand what you want to do, you're trying to update $('#result') with current value of $('#zip') at the time the event occurs.
Operator mapTo() takes a single value as argument. This value is then used instead of every value coming from its source. In effect this means that .mapTo($('#zip').val()) is initialized just once when you're creating the chain of Observables (even before you subscribe to it).
If you want it to be always the actual value you'll need some operator that takes a callback as a parameter. For example just map():
Rx.Observable.fromEvent(document.getElementById('btn'), 'click')
.map(function(val) {
return $('#zip').val();
})
.subscribe(function(zipCode){
$('#result').text(zipCode);
});
Your updated demo: http://jsbin.com/qepalo/1/edit?html,js,console,output
Related
I've got an application which has to show some options inside a select depending on a previous option. To achieve this, I've put the logic to show those options inside a controller function, like this:
vm.getScopeValues = function(tp){
var vals = [];
vals.push({n: 'Opt1', v: 'opt1'});
if(!tp || tp != 'somevalue'){
vals.push({n: 'Opt2', v: 'opt2'});
}
return vals;
};
The problem is that sometimes, I get an undefined as the value of the select options. On the following jsFiddle you can see a simpler approach, but with same result:
https://jsfiddle.net/nr9ffrkk/
As you can see:
If I write track by v, I get undefined
If I write track by o.v, then the values are right, but the ng-model does not get matched correctly
If I write o.v as o.n... without the track by, I get an error ($digest cycles)
When everything gets matched correctly (I achieved it somehow but cannot remember how), if I add a new dynamic "field" (click on "ADD NEW FIELD"), then they come out as undefined values again
I've made console.log to watch the returning values of the function, and it gets called correctly and returns the right values (nothing undefined).
I need to be able to create dinamycally new entries on the fields array (with an initial value for type, of course) and that the select gets the right values for the options.
UPDATED
As you can see, making a controller variable (not a function) with the values does not work neither, bringing the same problem:
https://jsfiddle.net/dgy5ryvh/
Thank you!
I extended an Ember.TextField to include a date picker. A function that observes the text field’s value attempts to parse the string in the text field and update a date property. This is all fine and good when you use the date picker, but if you were to try to type a date into the box, it goes crazy because the value gets updated on every keydown (or keyup or whatever Ember’s default event to update the value bindings for a TextField), and it immediately re-updates the value of the text field with the nicely-formatted date string that came from what it just parsed. Example:
Input says 10/26/2014
You insert your cursor after 2014 and hit backspace
The value has changed, so a handler parses 10/26/201 and updates a date property
The date property has changed, so a handler formats the date as MM/d/yyyy and sets the value
The input now says 10/26/0201
Rather than changing the way those handlers work, all my problems would be solved if I could tell Ember to update the value binding when the input’s change event fires, rather than trying to update everything on every keystroke. I know this can be done in AngularJS and Knockout, but I can’t find anything about it for Ember.
EDIT
I know I can change the way my code works to avoid this specific problem. At this point, I’m more interested for purposes of edification, in a yes-or-no answer that specifically addresses the question that is the title of this post. I’m starting to think the answer is no, but wanted to poll the community.
I wrote a blog post that may offer some solutions about Date Pickers And Validation In Ember with examples here is one of the JSBins from the post.
Write your own extension of text field component and add the change callback.
App.DateTextComponent = Em.TextField.extend({
change: function(event){
var value = this.get('value');
// massage data
value += "foo";
this.set('value', value);
}
});
Example: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/suzami/2/edit
If you really want to get a call when the value changes after the fact, don't observe the value, use actions.
App.DateTextComponent = Em.TextField.extend({
change: function(event){
var value = this.get('value');
this.sendAction('changed', value);
}
});
{{date-text value=foo changed='fooChanged'}}
Example: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/suzami/3/edit?html,js,output
I'm using ngList within an text box to get and post data to my server. The issue I've found is that while I can directly affect the generated array by removing indexes, when removing an item this way, the string in the input field is left unaffected.
The problem here is that as soon as the text field is modified, whatever is contained in that field immediately updates the model, restoring whatever items were removed.
http://plnkr.co/edit/EqkWwyLwvHrrhT6epOYP?p=preview
Does anyone have a solution for updating the string within the text field to match the model as the model is updated? My thought was to use an $apply either on my function or within a $watch but in both cases I got $apply in progress errors.
$scope.states.splice(index, 1);
It will not update ng-list because the change mechanism only invoked if previous value is not equal current value strictly...
So if you will create new instance instead of the splice current one nothing will be invoked because it is the same array instance so replace this code with the current one and it will be what you want...
var tmpList = angular.copy($scope.states);
tmpList.splice(index, 1);
$scope.states = tmpList;
and here is PLUNKER
With some help from StackOverflow community I was able to get my dirty flag implementation to work, based on this example: http://www.knockmeout.net/2011/05/creating-smart-dirty-flag-in-knockoutjs.html
It does exactly what I want, except for a single use case that I don't know how to solve.
Basically I have a select menu that gets automatically populated from the database. This select menu also has an option to make an Ajax call to my back end and have the list of options refreshed, database updated and return the result. This is where things get hairy for me.
First method works fine, however, it has to re-index and re-apply my entire viewModel and takes about 2-3 seconds, running on a local machine with 16gigs of ram and SSD.
jsondata.component.available_tags = result.available_tags;
ko.mapping.fromJS(jsondata, viewModel);
Second method also works, and pretty much instantaneous, however, it sets of isDirty() flag, which I would like to avoid, because this data is already coming from the database and I wont need to save it. I can not use isDirty.reset() method either, because if isDirty was set by something else before I clicked an menu option to update available_tags, it will reset that too. Which I would also like to avoid.
viewModel().component.available_tags(result.available_tags);
My question is: With the first method, can I force UI refresh with ko.mapping.fromJS() on a particular element and not entire dataset? Or, with a second method, can I avoid setting isDirty flag set when available_tags are updated? The twist is that I still need to keep available_tags as an observable, so the select menu is automatically generate/updated.
UPDATE: I was able to update mapping for that one single element with
ko.mapping.fromJS(result.available_tags, {}, viewModel().component.available_tags);
but that immediately set off isDirty flag... Argh
In addition to Tomalak's suggestions, which I totally agree with, maybe the toJSON method can help you out in similar cases where you don't want to split the model. If your dirty flag implementation uses ko.toJSON as a hash function, as Ryan Niemeyer's does, you can give your model (on which the dirty flag is active) a toJSON method, where you do something like this:
function MyObjectConstructor() {
this.someProperty = ko.observable();
this.somePropertyNotUsedInDirtyFlag = ko.observable();
}
MyObjectConstructor.prototype.toJSON = function () {
var result = ko.toJS(this);
delete result.somePropertyNotUsedInDirtyFlag;
return result;
};
Please be aware that this is also used to serialize the object in some other occassions, such as ajax calls. It's generally a handy function for removing computeds and such from your objects before using them in a different context.
I have a problem with two drop down lists ( options ) in a form. They both work separately but together they don't work at all. It's like they are canceling each other out or something. If anyone can help me then I'll be truly grateful. Here's the code with the problem... JS fiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/wemdragon/3Uz/
There are a couple problems. First off, .val() gets a string rather than an int, so if ('0') will return true. Therefore, options 2! is always emitted no matter what you have selected for the second option. You need to update that conditional to check if (second.val() != 0) (this will coerce '0' and 0 and return true -- you can also get more specific or simply use an empty string as the value instead, which is probably preferred).
Second of all, your calculation code is never reached since it is the else in the chain of ifs that cover all possible combination of selections. You need some other flag to check that the calculation should be done, or make it a function that is called when a valid selection is made.