I need your help for a little algorithme for my app :
i have an object like this :
var obj = { "response" : [
"candidate" : {
"id":"1",
"price" : 10,
"distance" : 20
},
"candidate" : {
"id":"2"
"price" : 14,
"distance" : 2
},
"candidate" : {
"id":"3",
"price" : 200,
"distance" : 1
}
] }
Which i sort by price like this :
var sortPrice = _(obj.response).sortBy(function(p){
return p.candidate.price
})
It works fine and sort the object (ids) : 1,2,3
Now if candidate has the same price but different distance, i should show first candidate with the same price and the lowest distance :
var obj = { "response" : [
"candidate" : {
"id":"1",
"price" : 10,
"distance" : 20
},
"candidate" : {
"id":"2"
"price" : 10,
"distance" : 2
},
"candidate" : {
"id":"3",
"price" : 200,
"distance" : 1
}
] }
var sorted = _(obj.response).chain().sortBy(function (p) {
return parseInt(p.candidate.price) ;
}).sortBy(function(d){
return parseInt(d.candidate.distance)
}).value();
But it sort me the lowest distance first (ids) : 3(with distance 1), 2(with distance 2), 1(with distance 20) than 2,1,3
Do you have any suggestion?
Thank you.
In pure js you can use sort() like this.
var obj = {
"response": [{
"candidate": {
"id": "1",
"price": 8,
"distance": 20
}
}, {
"candidate": {
"id": "2",
"price": 8,
"distance": 2
}
}, {
"candidate": {
"id": "3",
"price": 200,
"distance": 1
}
}]
}
obj.response.sort(function(a, b) {
return a.candidate.price - b.candidate.price || a.candidate.distance - b.candidate.distance;
})
console.log(obj.response)
Lodash is a fork of underscore that allows you to sort by several properties of the object.
Using it, a solution could be:
_(obj.response).map(_.partial(_.get, _, 'candidate')).sortBy(['price', 'distance']).value();
Here's the fiddle in case you want to play with it.
Related
I'm stucked in a (in my opinion) complex reduce method.
Given is an array of objects.
const data =
[
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : 32,
"type" : "OUT"
},
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : 16,
"type" : "OUT"
},
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : 8,
"type" : "IN"
},
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : 32,
"type" : "OUT"
},
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : 16,
"type" : "IN"
},
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : 8,
"type" : "OUT"
},
];
I want to get the sum of values of each object grouped by key attribute. There are two type attributes (IN, OUT) where OUT should be interpreted as negative value.
So in the example above, I'm expecting following result object:
//-32 - 16 + 8 = -40
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : -40,
"type" : "-"
},
//-32 + 16 - 8 = -24
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : -24,
"type" : "-"
},
I'm grouping the data using the groupBy function of this SO answer.
Now I'm trying to get the sum using reduce with a filter, like in this SO answer.
However, it delivers me the wrong sums (16 and 8) + since I use filter - only one type is considered.
Here is my code:
const data =
[
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : 32,
"type" : "OUT"
},
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : 16,
"type" : "OUT"
},
{
"key" : "test1",
"value" : 8,
"type" : "IN"
},
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : 32,
"type" : "OUT"
},
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : 16,
"type" : "IN"
},
{
"key" : "test2",
"value" : 8,
"type" : "OUT"
},
];
//group by key
const groupBy = function(xs, key) {
return xs.reduce(function(rv, x) {
(rv[x[key]] = rv[x[key]] || []).push(x);
return rv;
}, {});
};
const grouped = groupBy(data,"key");
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(grouped))
{
let x = value.filter(({type}) => type === 'OUT')
.reduce((sum, record) => sum + record.value)
console.log(x);
}
//const filtered = grouped.filter(({type}) => type === 'OUT');
console.log(Object.values(grouped));
Question 1:
Why does the reduce give me the wrong sum for type OUT?
Question 2:
Is there a way to consider both types (IN, OUT) without doing the same procedure again?
You can combine the grouping + counting in 1 reduce() if you set the default value to 0, you can always add (or remove) the value from the current key (type)
const data = [{"key" : "test1", "value" : 32, "type" : "OUT"}, {"key" : "test1", "value" : 16, "type" : "OUT"}, {"key" : "test1", "value" : 8, "type" : "IN"}, {"key" : "test2", "value" : 32, "type" : "OUT"}, {"key" : "test2", "value" : 16, "type" : "IN"}, {"key" : "test2", "value" : 8, "type" : "OUT"}, ];
const res = data.reduce((p, c) => {
(p[c['key']] = p[c['key']] || { ...c, value: 0 });
p[c['key']].value =
(c.type === 'IN')
? (p[c['key']].value + c.value)
: (p[c['key']].value - c.value);
return p;
},{});
console.log(res)
Output:
{
"test1": {
"key": "test1",
"value": -40,
"type": "OUT"
},
"test2": {
"key": "test2",
"value": -24,
"type": "OUT"
}
}
I would break this into two problems:
How to reduce each data value (reduce)
How to evaluate existing/new values (switch)
This way your code is less-coupled and it affords you with greater extensibility. Adding a new operator is as simple as adding a new case in the switch.
const reduceValue = (type, existingValue, newValue) => {
switch (type) {
case 'IN' : return existingValue + newValue;
case 'OUT' : return existingValue - newValue;
default : return existingValue; // or throw new Error(`Unsupported type: ${type}`)
}
};
const processValues = (data) =>
data.reduce((acc, { key, type, value }) => {
acc[key] ??= { key, type: '-', value: 0 };
acc[key].value = reduceValue(type, acc[key].value, value);
return acc;
},{});
const testData = [
{ "key" : "test1", "value" : 32, "type" : "OUT" },
{ "key" : "test1", "value" : 16, "type" : "OUT" },
{ "key" : "test1", "value" : 8, "type" : "IN" },
{ "key" : "test2", "value" : 32, "type" : "OUT" },
{ "key" : "test2", "value" : 16, "type" : "IN" },
{ "key" : "test2", "value" : 8, "type" : "OUT" }
];
console.log(processValues(testData))
.as-console-wrapper { top: 0; max-height: 100% !important; }
I would create 2 functions for applying the sign and store them in a variable.
const applySign = { "IN": nr => +nr, "OUT": nr => -nr };
Then do a simple for...of loop (with object destructuring). If there is no running total at the moment for the current key, set the initial value to 0 (using nullish coalescing assignment ??=). Finally add the current value with applied sign to the running total.
const sums = {};
for (const { key, value, type } of data) {
sums[key] ??= 0;
sums[key] += applySign[type](value);
}
const data = [
{ key: "test1", value: 32, type: "OUT" },
{ key: "test1", value: 16, type: "OUT" },
{ key: "test1", value: 8, type: "IN" },
{ key: "test2", value: 32, type: "OUT" },
{ key: "test2", value: 16, type: "IN" },
{ key: "test2", value: 8, type: "OUT" },
];
const applySign = { "IN": nr => +nr, "OUT": nr => -nr };
const sums = {};
for (const { key, value, type } of data) {
sums[key] ??= 0;
sums[key] += applySign[type](value);
}
console.log(sums);
With a few simple tweaks you can change the above in the output you're looking for:
const sums = {};
for (const { key, value, type } of data) {
sums[key] ??= { key, value: 0 };
sums[key].value += applySign[type](value);
}
const expected = Object.values(sums);
This gives you the base answer, though the type properties that you expect are currently missing. To add them you'll have to do another loop and check the final sum result.
for (const sum of expected) {
sum.type = sum.value < 0 ? "-" : "+";
}
const data = [
{ key: "test1", value: 32, type: "OUT" },
{ key: "test1", value: 16, type: "OUT" },
{ key: "test1", value: 8, type: "IN" },
{ key: "test2", value: 32, type: "OUT" },
{ key: "test2", value: 16, type: "IN" },
{ key: "test2", value: 8, type: "OUT" },
];
const applySign = { "IN": nr => +nr, "OUT": nr => -nr };
const sums = {};
for (const { key, value, type } of data) {
sums[key] ??= { key, value: 0 };
sums[key].value += applySign[type](value);
}
const expected = Object.values(sums);
console.log(expected);
// add type based on the value sign (don't know why)
for (const sum of expected) {
sum.type = sum.value < 0 ? "-" : "+";
}
console.log(expected);
If type is a static "-" and was not supposed to depend on the sign of value, then you can add it when you initially create the sum object.
sums[key] ??= { key, value: 0, type: "-" };
Say I have a dictionary with nested sub-dictionaries:
let dict =
{
"SEATTLE" : {
"gross_sales" : 106766,
"price" : 584.50,
"dates" : [ {
"date" : "2020-03-13",
"total_sales_to_date" : 2,
"new_sales" : 2,
}
, {
"date" : "2020-03-19",
"total_sales_to_date" : 5,
"new_sales" : 3,
}
]
}
,
"PHOENIX" : {
"gross_sales" : 26691.5,
"price" : 292.25,
"dates" : [ {
"date" : "2020-03-13",
"total_sales_to_date" : 9,
"new_sales" : 9,
}
, {
"date" : "2020-03-19",
"total_sales_to_date" : 19,
"new_sales" : 10,
}
]
}
}
And I would like to normalise each numerical value in the key/value pairs against the other key/values and then append these as new key/value pairs.
For the dates array of time-series data I'd like to normalise each key/value pair in each date against both time (within the array) and against the other locations on the same date (other objects).
For example, this is what I'm seeking after the operation:
{
"SEATTLE" : {
"gross_sales" : 106766,
"normalised_gross_sales" : 1.0,
"price" : 584.50,
"normalised_price" : 1.0,
"dates" : [ {
"date" : "2020-03-13",
"total_sales_to_date" : 2,
"norm_total_sales_over_time" : 0.4,
"norm_total_sales_over_locations" : 0.22222222,
"new_sales" : 2,
}
, {
"date" : "2020-03-19",
"total_sales_to_date" : 5,
"norm_total_sales_over_time" : 1.0,
"norm_total_sales_over_locations" : 0.26315789,
"new_sales" : 3,
}
]
}
,
"PHOENIX" : {
"gross_sales" : 26691.5,
"normalised_gross_sales" : 0.25,
"price" : 292.25,
"normalised_price" : 0.5,
"dates" : [ {
"date" : "2020-03-13",
"total_sales_to_date" : 9,
"norm_total_sales_over_time" : 0.47368421,
"norm_total_sales_over_locations" : 1.0,
"new_sales" : 9,
}
, {
"date" : "2020-03-19",
"total_sales_to_date" : 19,
"norm_total_sales_over_time" : 1.0,
"norm_total_sales_over_locations" : 1.0,
"new_sales" : 10,
}
]
}
}
ie: the total_sales_to_date value for the last date in the array should normalise to 1.0 as norm_total_sales_over_time
and the largest total_sales_to_date value for all objects (SEATTLE, PHOENIX) for the current date in the array should normalise to 1.0 as norm_total_sales_over_locations
I'm finding this very complex to handle in JS. My actual task involves dictionaries with hundreds of sub-dictionaries I need to compare, I'm looking for a scalable solution. In a pandas dataframe this would be trivial, however I'd like to learn how to approach this using modern javascript only as I'm running this process from node.js using an ES6 interpreter.
What is an effective ES6 javascript solution to this?
Here is a solution that returns the normalised values in the manner described:
let dict = {
"SEATTLE": {
"gross_sales": 106766,
"price": 584.50,
"dates": [{
"date": "2020-03-13",
"total_sales_to_date": 2,
"new_sales": 2,
}, {
"date": "2020-03-19",
"total_sales_to_date": 5,
"new_sales": 3,
}]
},
"PHOENIX": {
"gross_sales": 26691.5,
"price": 292.25,
"dates": [{
"date": "2020-03-13",
"total_sales_to_date": 9,
"new_sales": 9,
}, {
"date": "2020-03-19",
"total_sales_to_date": 19,
"new_sales": 10,
}]
}
}
async function normaliseDict(_dict) {
let values = await Object.values(_dict);
// make arrays with values from each key
let all_gross_sales = [];
let all_price = [];
let all_total_sales = {};
values.forEach((element) => {
all_gross_sales.push(element.gross_sales);
all_price.push(element.price);
let most_recent_total_sales_value = element.dates[element.dates.length - 1].total_sales_to_date;
element.dates.forEach((date, idx) => {
date.norm_total_sales_over_time = date.total_sales_to_date / most_recent_total_sales_value;
if (all_total_sales[date.date]) all_total_sales[date.date].push(date.total_sales_to_date);
else {
all_total_sales[date.date] = [];
all_total_sales[date.date].push(date.total_sales_to_date);
}
});
});
const newDict = values.map(ob => {
ob.gross_sales_norm = ob.gross_sales / Math.max(...all_gross_sales);
ob.price_norm = ob.price / Math.max(...all_price);
return ob;
});
values.forEach((element) => {
element.dates.forEach((date, idx) => {
date.norm_total_sales_over_locations_for_this_date = date.total_sales_to_date / Math.max(...all_total_sales[date.date]);
});
});
return await dict;
}
(async () => {
console.log(await normaliseDict(dict))
})()
I really need Your help! I have a .JSON file that looks something like this:
{
"_id" : { "$yid" : "279e128r" },
"userId" : "245981e3",
"data" : {
"workRate" : 51,
"workStages" : [
{ "quantity" : 33, "value" : "APPLES" },
{ "quantity" : 32, "value" : "PEACH" },
{ "quantity" : 12, "value" : "AVOCADO" },
{ "quantity" : 53, "value" : "APPLES" },
{ "quantity" : 22, "value" : "PEACH" },
{ "quantity" : 27, "value" : "AVOCADO" }
],
"timeInterval" : 25,
"timeSource" : 1
},
"sessionStartTime" : 1494311320,
"sessionEndTime" : 1494336640
}
There are around 500 id ("_id") with 30 participants ("userId").
So I want to take the existing JSON data, and create a new Array that has only 30 Objects ( each object for each participant ) and then find the "data" field and count up the times that vegetables were mentioned, and combine them, and have the number of times that it was mentioned.
{
"userId" : "245981e3",
"data" : {
"workRate" : 51,
"workStages" : [
{ "value" : "APPLES", "times": 2 },
{ "value" : "PEACH", "times": 2 },
{ "value" : "AVOCADO", "times": 2 }
]
}
}
{
"userId" : "7295ew41",
"data" : {
"workRate" : 45,
"workStages" : [
{ "value" : "LEMON", "times": 13 },
{ "value" : "AVOCADO", "times": 42 },
{ "value" : "KIWI", "times": 14 }
]
}
}
I know this sounds difficult, but I believe that there is somebody who will be able to help me out!
I have a collection that I am trying to map reduce by id and date to produce a graph for sales of a product in store vs online. A new object is created for each transaction, so I would like to reduce them to a total count for a given day. An object looks something like this:
object
{
"ProductID": 1
"Purchase Method": In Store
"Date": 2018-01-16
"Count": 5
}
What I am trying to achieve as output is to have in store and online purchases combined into 1 object with a key being the id and the date and then the value being the counts of each method as shown below:
ProductID: 1
Date: 2018-01-16
[
{Name: "In store", Count: 3}
{Name: "Online", Count: 2}
]
My current method was to map the objects by Id, date, and Purchase Method so the reduce would get the total count for that id on that date using that method, but this leads to having two entries for an id and date, 1 for in store and 1 for online. This is the current state of my functions:
var mapDailySales = function() {
var sale = this;
/*Converts timestamp to just date */
var pad = function pad(n, width, z) {
z = z || '0';
n = n + '';
return n.length >= width ? n : new Array(width - n.length + 1).join(z) + n;
};
var d = sale.Date;
var date = d.getFullYear() + "-" + pad(d.getMonth() + 1, 2, 0) + "-" + pad(d.getDate(), 2, 0);
emit({ProductId: sale.ProductID, Date:date, Method: sale.PurchaseMethod},
{Name: sale.PurchaseMethod, Count: 1})
};
var reduceDailySales = function(key, value) {
var res = {Name: 0, Count: 0};
value.forEach(function(value){
res.Name = value.Name;
res.Count += value.Count;
});
return res;
};
Current Output looks something like this:
{
"_id" : {
"ProductId" : 1,
"Date" : "2018-01-16",
"Method" : "Online"
},
"value" : {
"Name" : "Online",
"Count" : 3
}
}
Is there a way to achieve my desired output without map reducing again on the current output?
You can use aggregation pipeline to get the results instead of mapReduce, $group by ProductID and Date, with $project you can map counts to an array
added $out to write the results to new collection, removing it will return a cursor
db.prod.aggregate([
{$group : {
_id : {ProductID : "$ProductID", Date : "$Date"},
onlineCount : {$sum : {$cond : [{$eq : ["$PurchaseMethod", "Online"]}, "$Count" , 0]}},
storeCount : {$sum : {$cond : [{$eq : ["$PurchaseMethod", "In Store"]}, "$Count" , 0]}}
}
},
{$project : {
_id : 0,
ProductID : "$_id.ProductID",
Date : "$_id.Date",
counts : [{Name: "In Store", Count: "$storeCount"},{Name : "Online", Count: "$onlineCount"}]
}},
{$out : "count_stats"}
]).pretty()
collection
> db.prod.find()
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5a98ce4a62f54862fc7cd1f5"), "ProductID" : 1, "PurchaseMethod" : "In Store", "Date" : "2018-01-16", "Count" : 5 }
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5a98ce4a62f54862fc7cd1f6"), "ProductID" : 1, "PurchaseMethod" : "Online", "Date" : "2018-01-16", "Count" : 2 }
>
result
> db.count_stats.find()
{ "_id" : ObjectId("5a98d3366a5f43b12a39b4ac"), "ProductID" : 1, "Date" : "2018-01-16", "counts" : [ { "Name" : "In Store", "Count" : 5 }, { "Name" : "Online", "Count" : 2 } ] }
>
if you want to use mapReduce, you can use finalize to reduce or transform the result further
db.prod.mapReduce(
<map>,
<reduce>,
{
out: <collection>,
finalize: <function>
}
)
I am trying to display the json array according to certain start and end indices. I did displayed it all but when I click on first button it doesn't work. Here is my code .. after clicking on first button it says "this.data is undefined"
any help ??
function GridLibrary(data) {
this.data = data;
}
GridLibrary.prototype.display = function() {
var html = [];
html.push("<table >\n<tbody>");
html.push("<tr>");
for ( var propertyNames in this.data[0]) {
html.push("<th>" + propertyNames + "</th>");
}
html.push("</tr>");
// loop through the array of objects
for (var i = startIndex; i < endIndex; i++) {
item = this.data[i];
html.push("<tr>");
for ( var key in item) {
html.push("<td>" + item[key] + "</td>");
}
html.push("</tr>");
}
html.push("<table>\n</tbody>");
$('body').append(html.join(""));
};
var grid = new GridLibrary();
$("#first").click(function() {
//size = parseInt(document.getElementById("listsize").value, 10);
startIndex = 3;
endIndex = 6;
grid.display();
});
the Grid.jsp
<script type="text/javascript">
var json = [ {
"id" : 1,
"name" : "name1",
"age" : 10,
"feedback" : "feedback1"
}, {
"id" : 2,
"name" : "name2",
"age" : 90,
"feedback" : "feedback2"
}, {
"id" : 3,
"name" : "name3",
"age" : 30,
"feedback" : "feedback3"
}, {
"id" : 4,
"name" : "name4",
"age" : 50,
"feedback" : "feedback4"
}, {
"id" : 5,
"name" : "name5",
"age" : 55,
"feedback" : "feedback5"
}, {
"id" : 6,
"name" : "name6",
"age" : 68,
"feedback" : "feedback6"
}, {
"id" : 7,
"name" : "name7",
"age" : 57,
"feedback" : "feedback7"
}, {
"id" : 8,
"name" : "name8",
"age" : 89,
"feedback" : "feedback8"
}, {
"id" : 9,
"name" : "name9",
"age" : 65,
"feedback" : "feedback9"
}, {
"id" : 10,
"name" : "name10",
"age" : 54,
"feedback" : "feedback10"
}, {
"id" : 11,
"name" : "name11",
"age" : 51,
"feedback" : "feedback11"
}, {
"id" : 12,
"name" : "name12",
"age" : 97,
"feedback" : "feedback12"
} ];
new GridLibrary(json).display();
</script>
I've made a few assumptions here.
1) Your constructor should accept a parameter which will be your data:
function GridLibrary(data){
this.data = data;
return this;
}
2) This will be used like so:
var grid = new GridLibrary(json);
3) You should then pass in startIndex and endIndex as parameters to display():
grid.display(0, 11);
or
grid.display(3, 6);
and change the method to accept those arguments:
GridLibrary.prototype.display = function(startIndex, endIndex) {...
4) Finally you should change the HTML (not append) to a specific div otherwise you will overwrite your first button:
$('#body').html(html.join(""));
DEMO
Just by looking at your code, it seems like you don't close your table tag properly. The last html.push adds a new <table>, instead of </table>. They are also in the wrong order, it should be </tbody></table>
edit: fixed formatting