I have WebView in a UWP application that loads webpage, and I have InvokeScriptAsync Method that calls JS function:
InvokeScriptAsync("myFunction", new List<string>());
This code, fires myFunction correctly, and the return is correct.
function myFunction(){
...
return true;
}
But, when I have strange bug... when I set breakpoint in this call, the app blink and latter stops working correctly, but if I remove this breakpoint, the application works fine.
In another side, when I debug JavaScript with Script option in debug settings, the .NET application Works correctly and apparently JavaScript too, but when myFunction return a value, blink again and app stops working.
I'ts posible that debug application influences the behavior of the application? Any idea to find the bug?
Thanks
I can't set breakpoint in C# code and Javascript code at the same time
It is not a supported feature to debug managed codes(C#) and javascript in one Visual Studio Instance. Please see Support Javascript/Managed mixed mode debugging.
Related
I'm working on a web portal platform where the javascript is added through a helper dialog on the page itself.
I accidentally added a Javascript line of code that has now disabled the helper dialog. I don't have easy access to the script files on the backend.
I can set a debug breakpoint on the bad line in Firefox (I didn't get the breakpoint working in Chrome or Safari since it was inline in the html), but I can not find any way to prevent that line of code or function to be executed.
How can I prevent a function called MyBadFunction() to be executed whilst debugging?
You can reassign the function name to do nothing. Type this into the console:
MyBadFunction = function() {};
I'm experimenting with a simple Javascript debugger for a WebView. I'd like to debug/control/inspect how some Javascript code is being executed inside my WebView.
I haven't found any solution other than using the WebChromeClient to receive the console messages.
Since I have access to the Javascript code I can add instrumentation code: a console.log call before each line, with a special message (e.g. "debugging line 3") that tells which lines have been executed.
It's quite rudimentary so I wonder if there's any better solution. It would be great if I could use the debugger statement to really control execution flow.
This is what I have been doing if I want to console.log() anything directly on the mobile browser so that debugging can be done on the actual device and not in emulator or similar...
I made JS debugger plugin and here is what it have:
it creates an absolutely positioned HTML element that is placed on top of the content and is semi transparent.
I made the JS logic that actually simulates what console.log() does and print out all desired information in mentioned HTML element
once plugin was done I simply used MoibileDebugger.log('what ever'); instead of console.log('what ever');
My code is still not published publicly but will do that soon, so that anyone can benefit from using it...
In any case this plugin can be made very quickly by anyone who is good in JS.
Company recently upgraded to Flash v11.8.800.168 and a flash movie which is loaded using SWFObject (1.1) is not working correctly in Internet Explorer (Firefox works fine). The movie is loaded dynamically using a jquery document.ready method using the "new SWFObject(...); so.write("ID")" method (again SWFObject 1.1).\
The movie on load calls a JavaScript function (which is built dynamically using server scripting). The function is being called correctly as checked by a debugger. The JavaScript function calls a method in the flash movie passing it some XML (which is used to render some user and navigation items).
Something like this:
function calledFromFlash() {
document.getElementById("FlashMovie").renderUsingXml('<?xml version 1.0"?><lotsofxml></lotsofxml>');
}
Like I said, this all works still in Firefox with the new Flash version.
When I step through the function above, using step into with the IE Debugger, I get the following steps:
function anonymous() {
return eval(this.CallFunction("<invoke name=\"renderUsingXml\" returntype=\"javascript\">" + __flash__argumentsToXML(arguments, 0) + "</invoke>"));
}
At this point, I checked the arguments variable and it contains the XML as one would expect. After the next step into, I get this:
try { __flash__toXML(calledFromFlash(undefined)); } catch (e) { "<undefined/>"; }
At this point the debugger is already on the catch, yet one more step into take the code into the "<undefined/>" section and I can see that e is Object Expected
What I've tried:
Static implementation without SWFObject. This works. But then Firefox doesn't process the XML properly (and it seems to be the same issue as IE)
Upgrading to SWFObject 2.2. Using dynamic implementation it fails still. Using static implementation it works in IE but not Firefox
This is NOT my flash movie, the source is... well, I don't know. The guy that wrote it has left the company. That said, this seems like such a crazy issue.
My proposed fix is simply to use SWFObject for Firefox and use a static implementation for IE, but I really want to know what is wrong.
This was caused by a bug in Flash Player 11.8.800.168. It has been fixed in 11.8.800.175.
Bug fixes:
3630443 - [External][Windows][IE] ExternalInterface.call() method with non-ASCII text as a parameter corrupts the characters on the Javascript side
we have developed an Intranet Management Application with Silverlight 4. We have been asked to add the functionality to call a remote desktop tool which is installed on clients using the Intranet SL App. In an earlier version of the tool written in ASP.NET we just added a Javascript function to the aspx page like this:
function RunShellCommand()
{
var launcher = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Shell");
launcher.Run("mstsc.exe");
}
and called it from ASP.NET.
Now it's clear that SL4 is running in a sandbox and that I cant use the AutomationFactory to create a WScript.Shell object (out of browser mode is not an option).
I thought I could circle around the problem by, again, adding the RunShellCommand javascript method in the aspx page where the SL4 control is hosted and call it via
HtmlPage.RegisterScriptableObject("Page", this);
HtmlPage.Window.Invoke("RunShellCommand", "dummydata");
from my ViewModel. When I run the Application the debugger just skips the RegisterScriptableObject method and quits. Nothing happens.
My question is if am doing something wrong or if this just wont work this way.
Is it possible that I cant do a RegisterScriptableObject from a viewmodel?
EDIT: When I explicitly put a try, catch block around the two methods I get an ArgumentException from the first method stating that the current instance has no scriptable members. When I delete the first method and only run the Invoke, I get a browser error stating that the automation server cant create the object. So is there really no way (except OOB mode) to do this?
Yes, the explanation is correct: you should add at least one method with the ScriptableMember attribute in order that you can use the RegisterScriptableObjectmethod. But it is used only for calling C#-methods from JavaScript.
As far as I see, you want to do the opposite: to call JavaScript code from the Silverlight application. Then you need only one line:
HtmlPage.Window.Invoke("RunShellCommand");
The error automation server cant create the object has nothing to do with Silverlight. I'm sure that if you call the JS function directly - the error will remain.
According to the internet, the reason might be not installed Microsoft Windows Script. Or it is because of security restrictions of the browser.
I have been developing a silverlight page using just xaml, javascript and html (I literally only have a .html, .js and .xaml file). The problem is, I just realized that it isn't working in any browser EXCEPT Internet Explorer (7 for sure).
I have too many lines of code to want to add vb.net or visual c code behind and use the html bridge. I just want the xaml mouse events to work directly as before. In other words, when the xaml's MouseLeftButtonDown says "highlightMe" I want that highlightMe function to be a javascript function. But I also want my page to work in any browser.
Now, I've played around with creating a brand new visual studio project with vb.net or visual c.net but the xaml file events seem to point to code behind events. Also, it compiles the silverlight into a .XAP file. The XAP file is actually a .ZIP file with a compiled dll and an appmanifest.xaml.
So, how do I configure my appManifest.xaml to handle a silverlight page that has only javascript and xaml (and an html file pointing to the .XAP as the source). The html part, I THINK I understand. AppManifest is a different story and I definitely need help with that one.
I think it has something to do with creating an app.xaml and page.xaml and using the x:Class value of the main tag.
Since I asked this question I found a page...
http://pagebrooks.com/archive/2009/02/19/custom-loading-screens-in-silverlight.aspx
...that 1) showed people recently using a similar model of .js, .xaml and .html for their silverlight page and 2) someone in the comments recommended using firebug to track down issues with silverlight javascript errors.
This proved to me it's ok to use this model of silverlight and that it should work in other browsers. This also made me go try firebug. Firebug is AWESOME. If you enable the console tab, you can see exactly where the javascript was hanging up. And now that it's working, I can see the result of my gets/posts to google app engine.
Firebug showed that I was using if then else statements in a way that only internet explorer allows. For example,
if (blah == 1) { blah2 = 3}
else { blah2 = 5};
works in every browser, but this doesn't:
if (blah == 1) { blah2 = 3} ;
else { blah2 = 5};
Firefox and chrome and safari all apparently need there to NOT be a ; end statement character between the else and if.
So, for the moment, I appear to have fixed my problem with cross-browser compatibility, but I'd still like to know more about appmanifest.xaml and how to make a .xap file with only javascript. I might need it later.