Hoping someone can advise a good strategy for this.
I have a page I am trying to code that has five elements on it. The content of these elements will change as one uses the page ... sometimes consisting of text, sometimes images ... and importantly the height of the content will change (all built using JavaScript). The idea is that all of this will be visible on the screen at once.
The issue is that I want the elements to retain their positions on the screen (e.g., upper left, exact center, etc.) regardless of the size of the others. For example, the element in the middle may be a single line of text and may suddenly become a 300 px high image, may then become a 100 px high image. When that happens, I don't want the objects below it to move up or down.
(PS: this will only be used on a desktop computer)
Is there a way to HTML or CSS this to give these elements absolute positions (e.g., the one one in the middle: 50% from top, 50% from left, centered on the screen) regardless of the size of the others? I was previously just using line breaks and position things using line heights, but that causes elements lower on the screen to "move" down when the higher ones resize.
Any help or suggestions would be appreciated!
youc can use CSS for this, you should try with position property(relative/absolute)/ Check this out link and this link
Related
I know how to change font size using CSS, and I know how to scale text inside a canvas, but is it possible to scale text outside of a canvas using CSS/JS?
My problem right now is that I want dynamic objects on a page to resize along with the page, but when there is text on those objects, it fails to resize correctly, since fonts only have sizes in full pixel amounts and not fractions I get "jitter" or "jumps" while the user is resizing. Using percent amounts on the fonts doesn't change the fact that there's no such thing as a "16.5" size font, a 30 character text will jump by at least 30 pixels per increment.
This also causes an issue with word wrapping giving inconsistent results between resizes, one word per line might decide to jump randomly to the next line or not based on the size:font relation and this snowballs for the entire paragraph.
Basically I want to get the same visual effect on every x,y window size without having to store all texts as images, and without creating a canvas for every single text that I use which sounds kind of ridiculous. Is this possible?
I believe your best bet for controlling typography to this degree is going to be with the vh, vw, and vmin & vmax CSS properties: These allow you to scale text based on the viewport height, width, and the smaller & larger of the two, respectively.
I personally find these work well at medium-to-larger size resolutions, but begin to breakdown at narrower viewport sizes, where it may be wiser to forgo this level of control. See Viewport Sized Typography on CSS-Tricks for usage and more information.
I'm manipulating divs with javascript all the time.
Sometimes I need to make those divs fit inside a container who's size is contantly changing.
One way to make that happen is to use css scaling.
The problem with scaling is that it simply schrinks the picture of the element.
The system continues to see the element the same way. So all location etc. become skewed. For instance, if I position the div to become top:0%, then if the element has been scaled down it will not go to zero percent but a bit below that, because the system thinks the div is bigger than its visuals show.
This change in behavior causes a lot of complications as the system is now making assumptions about the elements that simply dont hold true.
It's bad programming.
I looked at the 'zoom' but the articles warned against using it.
Is there any way to scale elements and also keep the system updated on whats actually going on?
The default transform-origin is 50% 50% (the middle of the element), so when you reduce the size of an element with scale, the edges are "retracted" from all sides towards the middle.
so the top left corner appears to move down and to the right. But if you set the transform-origin to 0% 0% (top left) only the right and bottom sides move.
Hope this helps!
The latest vogue seems to be things that move when you scroll.
Now, I have a bunch of square divs containing a background image scattered around a long page of content. My idea is to ever so slightly make these background images slide upwards when you scroll downwards. The background image is as wide as the square, but 1.5 times as tall.
The easy solution is to set the backgroundPosition to a fraction of the current scrollTop, but when I thought about it more, it's not altogether that simple.
Essentially, the background image of a div should be at background-position: 0 0; when the div is just obscured beyond the fold. Once it appears, the top position would decrease relative to scrolling, until reaching the end of the background image's bottom edge once the div has disappeared over the top edge of the window.
The divs are floated within text content, so there's no way to hardcode any position values for them.
Maybe I could manage to do this on my own, but there are several considerations;
Scrolling back and forth at any speed, and never moving the background image to a location where any part of the square div wasn't covered.
Divs which appear in the middle of the page on load. It doesn't matter if the background-position isn't 0 0 for them initially, the important thing is that the background image moves at the same speed as all the others.
Adjusting when the user changes the window size.
Now since this is just an extra little flair, I'm not expecting amazing browser compatibility or that this would work on mobile (although if it does, cool).
But I can't even begin to think how all of this would work out. What would be the best way to achieve this? Since the scrolling sliding thing is so popular, are there any (jQuery) plug-ins that I could utilize to build this?
I have a page in which I have a wheel of <div> elements, the entire wheel rotates when you click a button.
I achieve this effect by using CSS transforms, which are absolute in nature. However the wheel is very big, it looks nice on my HD display, but smaller screens get the edges cut off. I can not use % widths like I could with a normal layout, what I need is to scale the entire page down in the same way most browsers zoom functions work.
For myself I know that ctr+mouseWheel will zoom out the page so I can see the entire page, however I can not expect others to do this.
I know I can use -browser-transform: scale(amt); on a wrapper div to get the effect I want, however I can not figure out a way to do it dynamically. If I set the scale to .5 it will be .5, no matter the screen. I want the edges of the wheel to just be a few pixels from the edges of the screen on ANY screen. I know that media queries could be used to help the problem, but they would either leave me with results that are less than ideal, or require too many different queries. There must be a way to modify -browser-transform: scale(amt); programmatically, or some other way to have finite control.
Any thoughts?
Have you tried using media queries in css to target different screens. for example, have a media query in your css file that states that at a width of 320 - 480 pixels, the div containing this wheel is scaled to 50%. Then at 481-768 pixels, the div container is scaled to 75%. and from 769 pixels up, the div is scaled to 100%.
That should help you accomplish the dynamic scaling you want at different screen sizes. If you would like a demo, I'll be glad to make a jsfiddle showing it.
I have this problem where I am trying to show multiple graphs (based on jsPlumb) on a single page. Since I want each graph to be side by side on one row no matter how much space is available I am using a table (if I used divs with float:left, if not enough space is available some of the divs move down on a separate row).
Now each table cell contains a main div which in turn contains two or more node-divs. The way jsPlumb works is by creating a separate div for each node. I need to position each node at a particular top/left relative to its parent div.
The problem I have is that the main graphDiv in each table cell does not expand to fit its content. Some of the graph-node divs are outside of it. I understand that when you have "absolute" positioned divs they are not taken into account. But I am using "relative" positioned divs with top/left coordinates. Does the same thing apply?
If so, what would be the best way for me to expand the table-cell/graphDiv to cover its content? (i have tried all the clear fixes and went thru all stack-overflow related posts but could not find a solution).
Here is a link to the jsfiddle page I set up: http://jsfiddle.net/7QkB2/28/
I'm a little rusty but I share your pain in trying to get divs to properly expand to contain their contents.
As explained by this page http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/relativepositioning when you use relative positioning you're actually leaving behind a hole where the content used to be. I'd think of it almost as an optical illusion - The object is still reserving an invisible block in its old position, but it appears as if it has moved.
So in your case, the 3 nodes are still stacked in the upper left corner of the graph even though they look like they're floating outside of it. If you get rid of all the absolute and relative positioning on the nodes you'll see the table is sized to be big enough to fit their original positions.
I'd recommend usually only using position relative if you're only moving your content by a few pixels. Why they designed the css to work this way is a mystery to me, but maybe its something to do with the limitations of the rendering engines? When you use position absolute the object no longer has a "box" taking up space in the document. It's easy to position, but won't affect the spacing of anything else as you observed.
I'm not sure your exact application, but you may need to get creative with how you specify the spacing. If you know the dimensions you can always specify them, but I'm guessing you're not that lucky. Do you really want to set the position relative to the top-left corner, or just relative to the other nodes? I'd probably just use old-fashioned margins. That should allow you to specify the positions of the content that needs to fit in the table while maintaining the block model. Then if you need one of the nodes to overlap, position it using absolute positioning.
Have you tried displaying each div as an inline-block and turning off line wrapping on the enclosing div? You don't have to resort to tables if you want content with a dynamic width to display horizontally without wrapping.
div.graph {
display: inline-block;
}
div.graph-container {
white-space: nowrap;
}