i've the following array of object, (ets say that the timestemp here is mock and greater is the last one)
var firstArr = [{
id: 1,
a: 2,
timestemp: 111
}, {
id: 2,
a: 4,
timestemp: 222
}, {
id: 3,
a: 6,
timestemp: 333
}, {
id: 1,
a: 3,
timestemp: 777
}, {
id: 3,
a: 5555,
timestemp: 5555
}];
What I need to do is somehow filter this array and create new array with unique value.
I need at the end
var endArr = [{
id: 1,
a: 3,
timestemp: 777
}, {
id: 2,
a: 4,
timestemp: 222
}, {
id: 3,
a: 5555,
timestemp: 555
}];
As you can see I've filter this array by two things
uniqe ID (the entry 1 & 3 are exist just once)
timestemp (add just the object with the last timestemp)
How can I do that with array methods such as map/reduce/filter?
I try to do it with array.filter without success
You can use orderBy() and uniqBy() to get all items with unique ids that has the latest timestamps:
var firstArr = [{
id: 1,
a: 2,
timestamp: 111
}, {
id: 2,
a: 4,
timestamp: 222
}, {
id: 3,
a: 6,
timestamp: 333
}, {
id: 1,
a: 3,
timestamp: 777
}, {
id: 3,
a: 5555,
timestamp: 5555
}];
var result = _(firstArr)
.orderBy(['id', 'timestamp'], ['asc', 'desc'])
.uniqBy('id')
.value();
console.log(result);
<script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/lodash/4.13.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
First of all you spelt timestamp as timestemp.
var firstArr = [{
id: 1,
a: 2,
timestamp: 111
}, {
id: 2,
a: 4,
timestamp: 222
}, {
id: 3,
a: 6,
timestamp: 333
}, {
id: 1,
a: 3,
timestamp: 777
}, {
id: 3,
a: 5555,
timestamp: 5555
}];
Here is the function:
function updateList(a_list) {
var seen = {};
for (var entry in a_list) {
var id = a_list[entry]["id"];
if (seen.hasOwnProperty(id)) {
var current_timestamp = seen[id]["timestamp"]
var check_timestamp = a_list[entry]["timestamp"]
if (current_timestamp < check_timestamp) {
seen[id] = a_list[entry];
}
} else {
seen[id] = a_list[entry];
}
}
var updated = [];
for (var newest in seen) {
updated.push(seen[newest]);
}
return updated;
}
https://jsfiddle.net/vpg3onqm/
If this is the answer you want, make sure to press upvote and the greentick.
Because of the requirement of using filter/map/reduce, I think I'd go with:
var lastestPerId = firstArr.reduce(function(state, curr) {
if(state[curr.id]){ // We've seen this id before
if(curr.timestemp > state[curr.id].timestemp) { // and its later
state[curr.id] = curr; // so, update this item to be the latest item
}
} else {
state[curr.id] = curr; // add because unknown
}
return state; // pass along the state to the next item in the array
}, {});
var endArr = Object.keys(lastestPerId)
.map(function (key) {return bestPerId[key]});
This creates an initial state ({}), loops over each item in firstArr. It tries to find out if the id is already known, and if it is it keeps track (in state) of the item with the highest timestemp. The state is passed along for each element in firstArr. Because the result is an object (with id's as keys, and the actual item as value), we need to map it back to an array.
This will work if firstArr is sorted by timestamp. The returned array will also be sorted by timestamp.
Starting from the end of the array (larger timestamps), include the current element in the new array if it was not already found. found array is used to keep track of extracted elements.
var found = [];
firstArr.reverse().filter( function(el){
if( found.indexOf( el.id ) === -1 ){
found.push( el.id );
return true;
}
return false;
}).reverse();
groupBy is your friend: https://lodash.com/docs#groupBy
_(firstArr)
.groupBy('id')
.map(function(x) {
return _(x).orderBy(x,['timestemp'], ['desc']).head();
})
.value();
https://jsfiddle.net/koljada/53esaqLz/3/
You can sort and then filter first id occurrence:
var firstArr = [
{ id: 1, a: 2, timestemp: 111 },
{ id: 2, a: 4, timestemp: 222 },
{ id: 3, a: 6, timestemp: 333 },
{ id: 1, a: 3, timestemp: 777 },
{ id: 3, a: 5555, timestemp: 5555 }
];
// sort firstArr by decrescent timestamp:
firstArr.sort((x,y)=>y.timestemp-x.timestemp);
// get only the first occurrence of each id:
var endArr = firstArr.filter((o,i)=>i==firstArr.findIndex(u=>u.id==o.id));
// job finished
output.innerHTML = JSON.stringify( endArr, null, 2 );
<pre id=output>
Related
I need to find objects in array by matching array of ids. Array of ids can be longer or equal to length of array of persons. I made it with forEach loop of persons array and inside used includes method to find matched id but not sure that it is the good approach. Is there a way to optimize searching algorithm?
const ids = [1, 4, 9, 7, 5, 3];
const matchedPersons = [];
const persons = [
{
id: 1,
name: "James"
},
{
id: 2,
name: "Alan"
},
{
id: 3,
name: "Marry"
}
];
persons.forEach((person) => {
if (ids.includes(person.id)) {
matchedPersons.push(person);
}
});
console.log(matchedPersons);
codesanbox
You could take a Set with O(1) for the check.
const
ids = [1, 4, 9, 7, 5, 3],
persons = [{ id: 1, name: "James" }, { id: 2, name: "Alan" }, { id: 3, name: "Marry" }],
idsSet = new Set(ids),
matchedPersons = persons.filter(({ id }) => idsSet.has(id));
console.log(matchedPersons);
you better use filter. it does exactly what it is meant to do:
const ids = [1, 4, 9, 7, 5, 3];
const persons = [
{
id: 1,
name: "James"
},
{
id: 2,
name: "Alan"
},
{
id: 3,
name: "Marry"
}
];
const matchedPersons = persons.filter(({id}) => ids.includes(id))
console.log(matchedPersons)
you can use Map https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map/get
const ids = [1, 4, 9, 7, 5, 3];
const matchedPersons = [];
const persons = [
{
id: 1,
name: "James"
},
{
id: 2,
name: "Alan"
},
{
id: 3,
name: "Marry"
}
];
const personsMap = new Map()
persons.forEach((person) => {
personsMap.set(person.id, person)
});
persons.forEach((person) => {
if (personsMap.has(person.id)) {
matchedPersons.push(personsMap.get(person.id));
}
});
console.log(matchedPersons);
i want to sort an array of objects having id each object using another array that only has the ids, for example:
object = [
{id: 2, name: carlos},
{id: 1, name: maria},
{id: 4, name: juan},
{id: 3, name: pepe}, //this is the array that i want to be sorted or create a copy to return it
]
[1,2,3,4,5] //this is the array that i will use as reference to sort the first one
the final result should be:
object = [
{id: 1, name: maria},
{id: 2, name: carlos},
{id: 3, name: pepe},
{id: 4, name: juam}, //this is the array that i want to be sorted or create a copy to return it
]
im using two maps, but im always getting and array with undefined:
array_to_be_sorted.map((objects) => {
array_reference.map((id) => {
if (objects.id === id) {
return {...objects}
}
}
}
im using map cause think is the best way for bigs array, because im building a music player, so dont know how many tracks the does the user has
You could use Array.prototype.sort() method to get the result.
const data = [
{ id: 2, name: 'carlos' },
{ id: 1, name: 'maria' },
{ id: 4, name: 'juan' },
{ id: 3, name: 'pepe' },
];
const order = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
data.sort((x, y) => order.indexOf(x.id) - order.indexOf(y.id));
console.log(data);
Another solution using Map Object which is faster than the first one.
const data = [
{ id: 2, name: 'carlos' },
{ id: 1, name: 'maria' },
{ id: 4, name: 'juan' },
{ id: 3, name: 'pepe' },
];
const order = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
const map = new Map();
order.forEach((x, i) => map.set(x, i));
data.sort((x, y) => map.get(x.id) - map.get(y.id));
console.log(data);
Why not just use Array.prototpye.sort()? It's easy and fast.
const pre = document.querySelector('pre');
let object = [
{id: 2, name: 'carlos'},
{id: 1, name: 'maria'},
{id: 4, name: 'juan'},
{id: 3, name: 'pepe'}
];
const criteria = [1,2,3,4,5];
pre.innerText = 'object:' + JSON.stringify(object, null, 2) + '\n\n';
object.sort((a, b) => {
return criteria[a.id] - criteria[b.id];
});
pre.innerText += 'sorted object:' + JSON.stringify(object, null, 2);
Sort an array using criteria from a second array:
<pre></pre>
You can take advantage of Schwartzian transform and sort data based on another array.
const data = [ { id: 2, name: 'carlos' }, { id: 1, name: 'maria' }, { id: 4, name: 'juan' }, { id: 3, name: 'pepe' }, ],
order = [4, 2, 3, 1, 5],
result = data.map(o => {
const index = order.indexOf(o.id);
return [index, o];
})
.sort((a, b) => a[0] - b[0])
.map(([, o]) => o);
console.log(result);
This question already has answers here:
How do I sort an array of objects based on the ordering of another array?
(9 answers)
Javascript - sort array based on another array
(26 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have two arrays.
itemsArray =
[
{ id: 8, name: 'o'},
{ id: 7, name: 'g'},
{ id: 6, name: 'a'},
{ id: 5, name: 'k'},
{ id: 4, name: 'c'}
]
sortArray = [4,5]
How can i sort itemsArray by sortArray (lodash or pure), but i want to for this:
newArray =
[
{ id: 4, name: 'c'},
{ id: 5, name: 'k'},
{ id: 8, name: 'o'},
{ id: 7, name: 'g'},
{ id: 6, name: 'a'}
]
In a case like this where you want to sort on multiple levels, you need to sort them in descending order of importance inside your sorting function.
In this case we sort regularly on cases where both elements are either in or not in the sorting array.
var itemsArray = [
{ id: 8, name: 'o' },
{ id: 7, name: 'g' },
{ id: 6, name: 'a' },
{ id: 5, name: 'k' },
{ id: 4, name: 'c' }
];
var sortArray = [4, 5];
var sortedItemsArray = itemsArray.sort(function (a, b) {
if (sortArray.includes(a.id) == sortArray.includes(b.id)) { //both or neither are in sort array
return b.id - a.id;
}
else if (sortArray.includes(a.id)) { //only a in sort array
return -1;
}
else { //only b in sort array
return 1;
}
});
console.log(sortedItemsArray);
The above snippet could be expanded in multiple ways, but a popular approach is to separate it into several sorting steps.
var itemsArray = [
{ id: 8, name: 'o' },
{ id: 7, name: 'g' },
{ id: 6, name: 'a' },
{ id: 5, name: 'k' },
{ id: 4, name: 'c' }
];
var sortArray = [4, 5];
function sortId(a, b) {
return b.id - a.id;
}
function sortIdByList(a, b) {
if (sortArray.includes(a.id)) {
return -1;
}
if (sortArray.includes(b.id)) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
//TEST
var sortedItemsArray = itemsArray
.sort(sortId)
.sort(sortIdByList);
console.log(sortedItemsArray);
This pattern can be easier to maintain as each step is clearly labeled and the functions can be reused in other sorting cases.
The only downside to this pattern is that you end up iterating over the list multiple times, thus increasing the time to sort. Usually this is a non-issue but on very large lists this can be significant.
Sort by array index only
As the comments points out i misread the question, so my previous two sorting snippets doesn't necessarily give the desired result.
This version sorts only by id index in the sorting array:
var itemsArray = [
{ id: 8, name: 'o' },
{ id: 7, name: 'g' },
{ id: 6, name: 'a' },
{ id: 5, name: 'k' },
{ id: 4, name: 'c' }
];
var sortArray = [4, 5];
//TEST
var sortedItemsArray = itemsArray
.sort(function (a, b) {
//Calculate index value of a
var A = sortArray.indexOf(a.id);
if (A == -1) {
A = sortArray.length;
}
//Calculate index value of b
var B = sortArray.indexOf(b.id);
if (B == -1) {
B = sortArray.length;
}
//Return comparison
return A - B;
});
console.log(sortedItemsArray);
You could take the indices of the array for keeping the relative position and take the special items with a negative index to top for sorting.
Then sort the array by taking the indices.
var array = [{ id: 8, name: 'o' }, { id: 7, name: 'g' }, { id: 6, name: 'a' }, { id: 5, name: 'k' }, { id: 4, name: 'c' }],
sortArray = [4, 5],
indices = array.reduce((r, { id }, i) => (r[id] = i, r), {});
sortArray.forEach((id, i, { length }) => indices[id] = i - length);
array.sort(({ id: a }, { id: b }) => indices[a] - indices[b]);
console.log(array);
console.log(indices);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }
I want to concatenate 2 lists in immutable.js.
Both lists have this structure: { id, value }
The algorithm concatenate should do this:
If an ID exists in both list1 and list2 take the value from list2.
let list1 = [
{ id: 1, value: 'foo' },
{ id: 3, value: 'bar' },
{ id: 2, value: 'baz' },
]
let list2 = [
{ id: 1, value: 'quux' }, // id 1 exists in list1
{ id: 4, value: 'asd' },
]
let result = [
{ id: 1, value: 'quux' }, // from list 2
{ id: 3, value: 'bar' },
{ id: 2, value: 'baz' },
{ id: 4, value: 'asd' },
]
If Immutable.js has this functionality with another type (eg. Dictionary), I could also use that.
Algorithms for union
First you have to maintain two map with key as id and value as object then check for length of array which is of bigger size and pass the bigger size array with small size map to merged function there you can iterate over the array and check if it's exists in the map if yes then update the object and delete that row from map otherwise add the object into output. After the for loop complete check if map has element present then push all the values from map into output array and return;
index.js
const old = [
{ id: 1, value: 'foo' },
{ id: 3, value: 'bar' },
{ id: 2, value: 'baz' },
];
const newa = [
{ id: 1, value: 'quux' }, // update
{ id: 4, value: 'asd' }, // push
];
function merged(input,filterMap){
var output = [];
input.forEach(function(eachRow){
if(filterMap.hasOwnProperty(eachRow.id)){
output.push(Object.assign(eachRow,filterMap[eachRow.id]));
delete filterMap[eachRow.id];
}else{
output.push(eachRow);
}
});
if(Object.keys(filterMap).length > 0){
output = output.concat(Object.values(filterMap));
}
return output;
}
function parseData(first,second){
var mapFirst = {},
mapSecond = {};
var output = [];
first.forEach(function(eachRow){
mapFirst[eachRow.id] = eachRow;
});
second.forEach(function(eachRow){
mapSecond[eachRow.id] = eachRow;
});
if(first.length > second.length){
return merged(first,mapSecond);
}else{
return merged(second,mapFirst);
}
}
console.log(parseData(old,newa));
Working jsFiddle demo - https://jsfiddle.net/qz25hnmf/
I have an array object:
[
{ id:1, name: 'Pedro'},
{ id:2, name: 'Miko'},
{ id:3, name: 'Bear'},
{ id:4, name: 'Teddy'},
{ id:5, name: 'Mouse'}
]
And I have an array with ids [1, 3, 5],
How can I filter the array object to leave records only with id's from the second one?
If Array.includes() is supported, you can use it with Array.filter() to get the items:
const array = [
{ id: 1, name: 'Pedro'},
{ id: 2, name: 'Miko'},
{ id: 3, name: 'Bear'},
{ id: 4, name: 'Teddy'},
{ id: 5, name: 'Mouse'}
];
const filterArray = [1,3,5];
const result = array.filter(({ id }) => filterArray.includes(id));
console.log(result);
If includes is not supported, you can use Array.indexOf() instead:
var array = [
{ id: 1, name: 'Pedro'},
{ id: 2, name: 'Miko'},
{ id: 3, name: 'Bear'},
{ id: 4, name: 'Teddy'},
{ id: 5, name: 'Mouse'}
];
var filterArray = [1,3,5];
var result = array.filter(function(item) {
return filterArray.indexOf(item.id) !== -1;
});
console.log(result);
Maybe take a Array.prototype.reduce in combination with an Array.prototype.some. This keeps the order of the given array need.
var data = [
{ id: 3, name: 'Bear' },
{ id: 4, name: 'Teddy' },
{ id: 5, name: 'Mouse' },
{ id: 1, name: 'Pedro' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Miko' },
],
need = [1, 3, 5],
filtered = need.reduce(function (r, a) {
data.some(function (el) {
return a === el.id && r.push(el);
});
return r;
}, []);
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(filtered, 0, 4) + '</pre>');
To keep the order of data you can use Array.prototype.filter:
var data = [
{ id: 3, name: 'Bear' },
{ id: 4, name: 'Teddy' },
{ id: 5, name: 'Mouse' },
{ id: 1, name: 'Pedro' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Miko' },
],
need = [1, 3, 5],
filtered = data.filter(function (a) {
return ~need.indexOf(a.id);
});
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(filtered, 0, 4) + '</pre>');
In case the data set is small, you are ok with any of the offered solution (ones that use indexOf).
However, these solutions are O(n^2) ones, therefore, given the data set big enough, the lag can become noticeable. In this case, you should build an index prior to selecting elements.
Example:
function filterFast(data, ids) {
var index = ids.reduce(function(a,b) {a[b] = 1; return a;}, {});
return data.filter(function(item) {
return index[item.id] === 1;
});
}
And some benchmarking can be tested here.
You can use the filter method on your Array:
var data = [
{ id:1, name: 'Pedro'},
{ id:2, name: 'Miko'},
{ id:3, name: 'Bear'},
{ id:4, name: 'Teddy'},
{ id:5, name: 'Mouse'}
];
var ids = [1, 3, 5];
var filteredData = filterData(data, 'id', ids[1]);
function filterData(data, prop, values) {
return data.filter(function(item) {
return ~values.indexOf(item[prop]); // ~ returns 0 if indexOf returns -1
});
}
See it in action in this JSFiddle.
Or if you are using jQuery, another option may be:
var arr1 = [1, 3, 5],
arr2 = [{ id: 1, name: 'Pedro' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Miko' },
{ id: 3, name: 'Bear' },
{ id: 4, name: 'Teddy' },
{ id: 5, name: 'Mouse' }],
filtered = $.grep(arr2, function (item) {
if (arr1.indexOf(item.id) > -1) {
return true;
}
});
You can use a for loop on the object array and check hasOwnProperty in another for loop for each ids in [1,3,5] (break out of the loop once an id found). (And break out of the bigger for-loop once all ids are found) If your array object is ordered (e.g. elements sorted from smallest id to biggest id) and so are your list, this solution should be quite efficient.
var c = 0;
for(var i =0; i< objects.length; i++){
for(var v =0; v< list.length; v++)
if(objects[i].hasOwnProperty(list[v])){
delete objects[i]; c++; break;
}
if(c===list.length) break;
}
or use array.splice( i, 1 ); if you don't want an empty slot.
Using filter and indexOf will do the trick:
var filteredArray = dataArray.filter(function(obj) {
return idsArray.indexOf(obj.id) > -1;
});
However, indexOf has linear performance, and it will be called lots of times.
In ES6 you can use a set instead, whose has call has sublinear performance (on average):
var idsSet = new Set(idsArray),
filteredArray = dataArray.filter(obj => idsSet.has(obj.id));
Assuming the toString method of your ids is injective, you can achieve something similar in ES5:
var idsHash = Object.create(null);
idsArray.forEach(function(id) {
idsHash[id] = true;
});
var filteredArray = dataArray.filter(function(obj) {
return idsHash[obj.id];
});