How to remove unwanted padding on styled select in IE11/Windows 8

How to remove unwanted padding on styled select in IE11/Windows 8 - javascript

The select is hidden behind the text with opacity: 0 and will be opened normally with a click. My problem is, that the options got unwanted padding on top and bottom of the list in IE11 on Windows 8:
The padding comes from the changed height of the select. But I need it as large as the text to open it by click. I don't think there's any opportunity to reduce the select in height and open it with Javascript?
Running example:
div {
line-height: 50px;
font-size: 30px;
position: relative;
width: 300px;
}
select {
-webkit-appearance: none;
-moz-appearance: none;
appearance: none;
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
opacity: 0;
}
<div>
<select name="test" id="test">
<option>Lorem</option>
<option>Ipsum</option>
<option>Dolor</option>
<option>Sit</option>
<option>Amet</option>
</select>
<span>Open select</span>
</div>
Same problem occurs on the jQuery-Customselect-Plugin, which uses the same technique:
Also, I opened an issue on the plugin:
https://github.com/adamcoulombe/jquery.customSelect/issues/110

div {
line-height: 50px;
font-size: 30px;
position: relative;
width: 300px;
}
select {
/* changes */
padding-bottom: 0;
padding-top: 0;
-webkit-appearance: none;
-moz-appearance: none;
appearance: none;
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
opacity: 0;
}
<div>
<select name="test" id="test">
<option>Lorem</option>
<option>Ipsum</option>
<option>Dolor</option>
<option>Sit</option>
<option>Amet</option>
</select>
<span>Open select</span>
</div>

There is no way to remove padding from ie11 selects alone. Your best bet is to remove them all the selects and use css classes for uniquely styled ones.

Try adding a padding-top 0 px. Im not using ie11, but this could help.
select {
-webkit-appearance: none;
-moz-appearance: none;
padding-top:0px;
appearance: none;
display: block;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
opacity: 0;
}

You can still work with the :active state. Example uses padding:
select {
padding: 10px 0;
}
select:active {
padding: 0;
}
This may require some rigid positioning of the select element so it doesn't move when shrunk and made active, but that should be no issue.

Maybe you just need a CSS reset like this:
html, body, div, span, applet, object, iframe, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, p, blockquote, pre, a, abbr, acronym, address, big, cite, code, del, dfn, em, font, img, ins, kbd, q, s, samp, small, strike, strong, sub, sup, tt, var, b, u, i, center, dl, dt, dd, ol, ul, li, fieldset, form, label, legend, caption {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
outline: 0;
font-size: 100%;
vertical-align: baseline;
background: transparent;
}
Just put it above the others (or something call it first). It will give you a fresh pallet and wouldn't conflict with your next codes. Each browser has it's own preferences, so it would be nice (if you just want) to have a zero-like thing at start and no more need to do some/much "magic tricks".

I've fixed it on my own with some JS magic:
Now the size of the select isn't increased by CSS. Instead it is bound to the mouse movement on the element. So the padding in the option list is fine and the select is opening by clicking at all position on the styled span.
I've added an example (the green one), where you can see the technique behind.
function onMouseMove(event) {
var $div = $(this);
var divOffset = $div.offset();
var $select = $(this).find('select');
var relX = event.pageX - divOffset.left;
var relY = event.pageY - divOffset.top;
$select.css('top', relY - 5);
if(
relY > $div.height() ||
relX > $div.width() ||
relY < 0 ||
relX < 0
) {
$select.css('top', 'auto');
}
}
function onSelectClick(event) {
if($(event.target).is('select') === false) {
return;
}
$(this).addClass('select-open');
}
function onSelectBlur() {
$(this).parent().removeClass('select-open');
}
function onSelectChange() {
$(this).parent().removeClass('select-open');
}
function onBodyClick(event) {
if($(event.target).is('select')) {
return;
}
$('div.select-open').removeClass('select-open');
}
$('body')
.on('mousemove', 'div:not(.select-open)', onMouseMove)
.on('click', 'div:not(.select-open) select', onSelectClick)
.on('change', 'select', onSelectChange)
.on('blur', 'select', onSelectBlur)
;
div {
font-size: 30px;
position: relative;
width: 300px;
margin-bottom: 30px;
}
span {
display: block;
border-bottom: 1px solid black;
width: 100%;
line-height: 35px;
}
select {
-webkit-appearance: none;
-moz-appearance: none;
appearance: none;
display: block;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
opacity: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.visible-technique {
background: green;
}
.visible-technique select {
opacity: 1;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div>
<select name="test" id="test">
<option selected>Lorem</option>
<option>Ipsum</option>
<option>Dolor</option>
<option>Sit</option>
<option>Amet</option>
</select>
<span>Open select</span>
</div>
<div class="visible-technique">
<select name="test" id="test">
<option selected>Lorem</option>
<option>Ipsum</option>
<option>Dolor</option>
<option>Sit</option>
<option>Amet</option>
</select>
<span>Open select</span>
</div>
You can play with it on Codepen, too: http://codepen.io/roNn23/pen/OXyagN
Update
Sadly, I have to admit, that this bug can't be solved with this workaroud. The problem is, that there is no event to detect whether the select is closed. So you have sometimes to click two times to toggle the status and this isn't understandable for the user. So in my opinion, we have to live with this IE-bug when customizing the select. Otherwise you could use a select replacement script, but I wouldn't do this, because this is too much overhead for such a little problem.

Select is an html element that is rendered by browser. If you dont like the select component that browsers give you, you can design your own dropdown component using html, css, javascript.
Like what Telerik did
Telerik Kendo UI DropdownList

as i have gone through this problem before
and here i found very good reference link for that posted by Jerreck for the question
Question link
This extra whitespace is added by the browser's rendering engine. Form element rendering is inconsistent across browsers, and in this case is not determined by CSS.Take a look at this article from Mozilla explaining some ways to mitigate select box incosistency, then you might read this article from Smashing Magazine about styling form elements (be sure to check out the comments and the problems people have had with selects).
so for this i suggest that you might use any third party widget for select options for better UI consistency for select-option component it's my personal opinion. you can find widgets and plugins.
Note : one interesting fact for this padding is the height given to the this blank padding is appearing only when if you give height more than default height given by browser(IE) if you don't it will not add a padding at top and bottom
For Example :: if you give "60px" height then those padding will be 30px on top and 30px bottom i have marked this is just puts text of the tag in this.

The problem is the height of your select-element.
The first option of your option-list overlays with the visible select-text in IE11. The height of the selectbox generates a "padding", because the selectbox text is vertical middle aligned.
If you remove the height when the selectbox is active you shouldn't have a padding anymore.
select:active, select:focus {
height: auto;
}
EDIT:
In Win8 the selectbox loses the active-state on click so I added :focus - works for me :)
https://jsfiddle.net/s01xh3g5/1/
Selectbox height/"padding" culprit

Please try to set selected for the first option.
<select>
<option selected>Option 1</option>
<option>Option 2</option>
<option>Option 3</option>
</select>

Related

Dynamically increase and decrease an input text box size depending on another selector width

I have an input text box which has some padding to it. I also have a wrapper class selector which is used next to that input text box. I am trying to remove set padding from the input text box and make that space dynamic so that the element size would (especially width) increase and decrease depending on the screen size (i.e. Mobile or Large view as large screen) without effecting the wrapper.
The text box looks like the following. a, c, d, e are buttons which appear dynamically. So the space for b here should expand if the there is only one button on the right and decrease if there are all the buttons on the right.
|____|________________________ |_____|_____|_____|
a b c d e
so the css class selectors that I have includes b and another one includes all the c, d, e (wrapper).
I assume this can't only be done through CSS. Any suggestion?
CSS:
.input {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
max-width: var(--grid-main-max-width);
padding: 1.188rem 2.9rem 1.188rem 4.5rem;
margin: 0;
font-size: 16px;
border: 1px solid var(--color-gray);
border-radius: 0.375rem;
outline: 0;
}
.wrapper {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 1.5rem;
bottom: 0;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
HTML
<div>
<input class="input">
<div class= "wrapper">
<button>c</button>
<button>d</button>
<button>e</button>
</div>
</div>

The solution only needed to count the width of the input text box and the wrapper and assign the difference as a padding to the right of the input text box. The following little change was added to an onInput event.
document.getElemendById("inputTextBox").style.paddingRight = document.getElemendById("searchFieldWrapper").clientWidth;
And also needed to use Media Queries for #media (--large-viewport) / #media (--medium-viewport) to assign different padding for the input. as #Scott Marcus mentioned in a comment.

Lets say you have div child blocks for those child elements or you can specify some class.
div:first-child:nth-last-child(1){
width: 100%;
}
div:first-child:nth-last-child(2),
div:first-child:nth-last-child(2) ~ div{
width: 50%;
}
div:first-child:nth-last-child(3),
div:first-child:nth-last-child(3) ~ div{
width: 33.3%;
}
div:first-child:nth-last-child(4),
div:first-child:nth-last-child(4) ~ div{
width: 25%;
}
//and so on
Source refer to here
Also if you want to modify other elements you can use
div:first-child:nth-last-child(2) > .someClass{
style:goesHere
}

(UPDATE: I figured out you used a wrapper element, and that a is'nt a label but a button. But this answer is easily adaptable to your question.)
You can use the calc function provided by CSS. Given this piece of HTML (I joined all the elements to remove side effects of the blank characters; we can fix it in an other way but I wanted to keep the answer simple):
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body>
<article id="demo">
<label>a</label><input type="text" placeholder="b" /><button>c</button><button>d</button><button>e</button>
</article>
</body>
</html>
This piece of CSS allow the input text element to fill the available space.
article#demo {
/* the width (80vw) includes border and padding */
width: 80vw;
}
article#demo label {
/* to make label resizable */
display: inline-block;
width: 30px;
}
article#demo button {
width: 20px;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: #f0f0ff;
box-sizing: border-box;
/* see above */
}
article#demo input[type="text"] {
box-sizing: border-box;
/* text input width = 100% minus other items */
width: calc(100% - 30px - 3 * 20px);
}
You can set the width of article#demo using any unit (em, ex, etc.) it should work.
In your final design, use box-sizing:border-box to set the whole element, including borders and padding, within the CSS width. Otherwise, you'll have to adjust the calc parameter.
If you put left or right margins, count them too.
If you use font-dependent units (em, etc.), the same font-family and other font-related CSS entries have to be set - implicitly or not - for all the concerned elements.
Working fiddle with a little interactive test here.

Always focus mouse cursor in particular div in JQuery

I have a div "wtb_wrapper_middle" in middle of my web page.
For that div only scroll able in web page. In left and right div are not movable, it fixed in my web page.
So I want to mouse always focus on that particular div wherever my mouse clicked or mouse hover. Means when i use keyboard up or down button at that time that particular div only should be scroll.
Is there possible in JQuery.
My code is like below.
<div id="wtb_wrapper_inner">
<div id="wrapper_left">
....
....
....
</div>
<div id="wtb_wrapper_middle">
....
....
....
....
</div>
<div id="wtb_wrapper_right">
....
....
....
</div>
</div>
In from above html code "wtb_wrapper_middle" area only scrolls in my web page.
I have tried the below
window.onload = function() {
document.getElementById("wtb_wrapper_middle_inner").focus();
};
In this code is focus only on page load, but if clicked mouse in somewhere else, at that time also that middle area should be scroll. That is not working.
My Ajax callback function like below
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "search.php?ajaxrequest=yes",
data: query_string
}).done(function( data ) {
$(".wtb_p_loader").remove();
$("#wtb_wm_listing").append(data);
});
I'm appending return success data into the di wtb_wm_listing which is i have placed inside of main div wtb_wrapper_middle
Anyone help me to make it success..

You can do this using css position: fixed;
The two outer divs are fixed to the screen regardless of scroll position. Then the central div scrolls regardless of where the mouse pointer is. You can use top and bottom to fix the full height of the screen, then left and right to fix each on either side.
You can still interact with content in the fixed outer divs.
And the Html is
<div class='left'>
<a href='#'>Hover to check the mouse focus and scorll</a>
</div>
<div class='center'>
//some long content
</div>
<div class='right'>
</div>
Css for doing this action.
a {
color: #000;
display: block;
font-family: arial;
margin: 10px;
text-decoration: none;
}
a:hover {
background-color: #f03055;
color: #fafafa;
}
p {
color: #fafafa;
font-family: arial;
line-height: 24px;
margin: 0 0 25px 0;
padding: 0 2%;
}
.center {
background-color: #97c;
height: 2000px;
margin: 0 25%;
width: 50%%;
}
.left {
background-color: #7c9;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
width: 25%;
}
.right {
background-color: #7c9;
bottom: 0;
position: fixed;
right: 0;
top: 0;
width: 25%;
}

EDIT: to filter out input elements
document.body.onkeydown = function(event){
var e = event || window.event,
target = e.target || e.srcElement;
if (target.tagName.toUpperCase() == 'INPUT') return;
document.getElementById("wtb_wrapper_middle_inner").focus();
};
this will move focus to your middle div whenever keydown event occurs.

How to change div elements' css inside iframe [duplicate]

I have not had much success finding how to style Google's new recaptcha (v2). The eventual goal is to make it responsive, but I am having difficulty applying styling for even simple things like width.
Their API documentation does not appear to give any specifics on how to control styling at all other than the theme parameter, and simple CSS & JavaScript solutions haven't worked for me.
Basically, I need to be able to apply CSS to Google's new version of reCaptcha. Using JavaScript with it is acceptable.

Overview:
Sorry to be the answerer of bad news, but after research and debugging, it's pretty clear that there is no way to customize the styling of the new reCAPTCHA controls. The controls are wrapped in an iframe, which prevents the use of CSS to style them, and Same-Origin Policy prevents JavaScript from accessing the contents, ruling out even a hacky solution.
Why No Customize API?:
Unlike reCAPTCHA API Version 1.0, there are no customize options in API Version 2.0. If we consider how this new API works, it's no surprise why.
Excerpt from Are you a robot? Introducing “No CAPTCHA reCAPTCHA”:
While the new reCAPTCHA API may sound simple, there is a high degree of sophistication behind that modest checkbox. CAPTCHAs have long relied on the inability of robots to solve distorted text. However, our research recently showed that today’s Artificial Intelligence technology can solve even the most difficult variant of distorted text at 99.8% accuracy. Thus distorted text, on its own, is no longer a dependable test.
To counter this, last year we developed an Advanced Risk Analysis backend for reCAPTCHA that actively considers a user’s entire engagement with the CAPTCHA—before, during, and after—to determine whether that user is a human. This enables us to rely less on typing distorted text and, in turn, offer a better experience for users. We talked about this in our Valentine’s Day post earlier this year.
If you were able to directly manipulate the styling of the control elements, you could easily interfere with the user-profiling logic that makes the new reCAPTCHA possible.
What About a Custom Theme?:
Now the new API does offer a theme option, by which you can choose a preset theme such as light and dark. However there is not presently a way to create a custom theme. If we inspect the iframe, we will find the theme name is passed in the query string of the src attribute. This URL looks something like the following.
https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api2/anchor?...&theme=dark&...
This parameter determines what CSS class name is used on the wrapper element in the iframe and determines the preset theme to use.
Digging through the minified source, I found that there are actually 4 valid theme values, which is more than the 2 listed in the documentation, but default and standard are the same as light.
We can see the code that selects the class name from this object here.
There is no code for a custom theme, and if any other theme value is specified, it will use the standard theme.
In Conclusion:
At present, there is no way to fully style the new reCAPTCHA elements, only the wrapper elements around the iframe can be stylized. This was almost-certainly done intentionally, to prevent users from breaking the user profiling logic that makes the new captcha-free checkbox possible. It is possible that Google could implement a limited custom theme API, perhaps allowing you to choose custom colors for existing elements, but I would not expect Google to implement full CSS styling.

As guys mentioned above, there is no way ATM. but still if anyone interested, then by adding in just two lines you can at least make it look reasonable, if it break on any screen. you can assign different value in #media query.
<div id="recaptchaContainer" style="transform:scale(0.8);transform-origin:0 0"></div>
Hope this helps anyone :-).

I use below trick to make it responsive and remove borders. this tricks maybe hide recaptcha message/error.
This style is for rtl lang but you can change it easy.
.g-recaptcha {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
background: #f9f9f9;
overflow: hidden;
}
.g-recaptcha > * {
float: right;
right: 0;
margin: -2px -2px -10px;/*remove borders*/
}
.g-recaptcha::after{
display: block;
content: "";
position: absolute;
left:0;
right:150px;
top: 0;
bottom:0;
background-color: #f9f9f9;
clear: both;
}
<div class="g-recaptcha" data-sitekey="Your Api Key"></div>
<script src='https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?hl=fa'></script>

Unfortunately we cant style reCaptcha v2, but it is possible to make it look better, here is the code:
Click here to preview
.g-recaptcha-outer{
text-align: center;
border-radius: 2px;
background: #f9f9f9;
border-style: solid;
border-color: #37474f;
border-width: 1px;
border-bottom-width: 2px;
}
.g-recaptcha-inner{
width: 154px;
height: 82px;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.g-recaptcha{
position:relative;
left: -2px;
top: -1px;
}
<div class="g-recaptcha-outer">
<div class="g-recaptcha-inner">
<div class="g-recaptcha" data-size="compact" data-sitekey="YOUR KEY"></div>
</div>
</div>

Add a data-size property to the google recaptcha element and make it equal to "compact" in case of mobile.
Refer: google recaptcha docs

What you can do is to hide the ReCaptcha Control behind a div. Then make your styling on this div. And set the css "pointer-events: none" on it, so you can click through the div (Click through a DIV to underlying elements).
The checkbox should be in a place where the user is clicking.

You can recreate recaptcha , wrap it in a container and only let the checkbox visible. My main problem was that I couldn't take the full width so now it expands to the container width. The only problem is the expiration you can see a flick but as soon it happens I reset it.
See this demo http://codepen.io/alejandrolechuga/pen/YpmOJX
function recaptchaReady () {
grecaptcha.render('myrecaptcha', {
'sitekey': '6Lc7JBAUAAAAANrF3CJaIjt7T9IEFSmd85Qpc4gj',
'expired-callback': function () {
grecaptcha.reset();
console.log('recatpcha');
}
});
}
.recaptcha-wrapper {
height: 70px;
overflow: hidden;
background-color: #F9F9F9;
border-radius: 3px;
box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);
-webkit-box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);
-moz-box-shadow: 0px 0px 4px 1px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);
height: 70px;
position: relative;
margin-top: 17px;
border: 1px solid #d3d3d3;
color: #000;
}
.recaptcha-info {
background-size: 32px;
height: 32px;
margin: 0 13px 0 13px;
position: absolute;
right: 8px;
top: 9px;
width: 32px;
background-image: url(https://www.gstatic.com/recaptcha/api2/logo_48.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.rc-anchor-logo-text {
color: #9b9b9b;
cursor: default;
font-family: Roboto,helvetica,arial,sans-serif;
font-size: 10px;
font-weight: 400;
line-height: 10px;
margin-top: 5px;
text-align: center;
position: absolute;
right: 10px;
top: 37px;
}
.rc-anchor-checkbox-label {
font-family: Roboto,helvetica,arial,sans-serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: 400;
line-height: 17px;
left: 50px;
top: 26px;
position: absolute;
color: black;
}
.rc-anchor .rc-anchor-normal .rc-anchor-light {
border: none;
}
.rc-anchor-pt {
color: #9b9b9b;
font-family: Roboto,helvetica,arial,sans-serif;
font-size: 8px;
font-weight: 400;
right: 10px;
top: 53px;
position: absolute;
a:link {
color: #9b9b9b;
text-decoration: none;
}
}
g-recaptcha {
// transform:scale(0.95);
// -webkit-transform:scale(0.95);
// transform-origin:0 0;
// -webkit-transform-origin:0 0;
}
.g-recaptcha {
width: 41px;
/* border: 1px solid red; */
height: 38px;
overflow: hidden;
float: left;
margin-top: 16px;
margin-left: 6px;
> div {
width: 46px;
height: 30px;
background-color: #F9F9F9;
overflow: hidden;
border: 1px solid red;
transform: translate3d(-8px, -19px, 0px);
}
div {
border: 0;
}
}
<script src='https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=recaptchaReady&&render=explicit'></script>
<div class="recaptcha-wrapper">
<div id="myrecaptcha" class="g-recaptcha"></div>
<div class="rc-anchor-checkbox-label">I'm not a Robot.</div>
<div class="recaptcha-info"></div>
<div class="rc-anchor-logo-text">reCAPTCHA</div>
<div class="rc-anchor-pt">
Privacy
<span aria-hidden="true" role="presentation"> - </span>
Terms
</div>
</div>

Great!
Now here is styling available for reCaptcha..
I just use inline styling like:
<div class="g-recaptcha" data-sitekey="XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX" style="transform: scale(1.08); margin-left: 14px;"></div>
whatever you wanna to do small customize in inline styling...
Hope it will help you!!

I came across this answer trying to style the ReCaptcha v2 for a site that has a light and a dark mode. Played around some more and discovered that besides transform, filter is also applied to iframe elements so ended up using the default/light ReCaptcha and doing this when the user is in dark mode:
.g-recaptcha {
filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg);
}
The hue-rotate(180deg) makes it so that the logo is still blue and the check-mark is still green when the user clicks it, while keeping white invert()'ed to black and vice versa.
Didn't see this in any answer or comment so decided to share even if this is an old thread.

Just adding a hack-ish solution to make it responsive.
Wrap the recaptcha in an extra div:
<div class="recaptcha-wrap">
<div id="g-recaptcha"></div>
</div>
Add styles. This assumes the dark theme.
// Recaptcha
.recaptcha-wrap {
position: relative;
height: 76px;
padding:1px 0 0 1px;
background:#222;
> div {
position: absolute;
bottom: 2px;
right:2px;
font-size:10px;
color:#ccc;
}
}
// Hides top border
.recaptcha-wrap:after {
content:'';
display: block;
background-color: #222;
height: 2px;
width: 100%;
top: -1px;
left: 0px;
position: absolute;
}
// Hides left border
.recaptcha-wrap:before {
content:'';
display: block;
background-color: #222;
height: 100%;
width: 2px;
top: 0;
left: -1px;
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
}
// Makes it responsive & hides cut-off elements
#g-recaptcha {
overflow: hidden;
height: 76px;
border-right: 60px solid #222222;
border-top: 1px solid #222222;
border-bottom: 1px solid #222;
position: relative;
box-sizing: border-box;
max-width: 294px;
}
This yields the following:
It will now resize horizontally, and doesn't have a border. The recaptcha logo would get cut off on the right, so I am hiding it with a border-right. It's also hiding the privacy and terms links, so you may want to add those back in.
I attempted to set a height on the wrapper element, and then vertically center the recaptcha to reduce the height. Unfortunately, any combo of overflow:hidden and a smaller height seems to kill the iframe.

in the V2.0 it's not possible. The iframe blocks all styling out of this. It's difficult to add a custom theme instead of the dark or light one.

Late to the party, but maybe my solution will help somebody.
I haven't found any solution that works on a responsive website when the viewport changes or the layout is fluid.
So I've created a jQuery script for django-cms that is dynamically adapting to a changing viewport.
I'm going to update this response as soon as I have the need for a modern variant of it that is more modular and has no jQuery dependency.
html
<div class="g-recaptcha" data-sitekey="{site_key}" data-size={size}>
</div>
css
.g-recaptcha { display: none; }
.g-recaptcha.g-recaptcha-initted {
display: block;
overflow: hidden;
}
.g-recaptcha.g-recaptcha-initted > * {
transform-origin: top left;
}
js
window.djangoReCaptcha = {
list: [],
setup: function() {
$('.g-recaptcha').each(function() {
var $container = $(this);
var config = $container.data();
djangoReCaptcha.init($container, config);
});
$(window).on('resize orientationchange', function() {
$(djangoReCaptcha.list).each(function(idx, el) {
djangoReCaptcha.resize.apply(null, el);
});
});
},
resize: function($container, captchaSize) {
scaleFactor = ($container.width() / captchaSize.w);
$container.find('> *').css({
transform: 'scale(' + scaleFactor + ')',
height: (captchaSize.h * scaleFactor) + 'px'
});
},
init: function($container, config) {
grecaptcha.render($container.get(0), config);
var captchaSize, scaleFactor;
var $iframe = $container.find('iframe').eq(0);
$iframe.on('load', function() {
$container.addClass('g-recaptcha-initted');
captchaSize = captchaSize || { w: $iframe.width() - 2, h: $iframe.height() };
djangoReCaptcha.resize($container, captchaSize);
djangoReCaptcha.list.push([$container, captchaSize]);
});
},
lateInit: function(config) {
var $container = $('.g-recaptcha.g-recaptcha-late').eq(0).removeClass('.g-recaptcha-late');
djangoReCaptcha.init($container, config);
}
};
window.djangoReCaptchaSetup = window.djangoReCaptcha.setup;

With the integration of the invisible reCAPTCHA you can do the following:
To enable the Invisible reCAPTCHA, rather than put the parameters in a div, you can add them directly to an html button.
a. data-callback=””. This works just like the checkbox captcha, but is required for invisible.
b. data-badge: This allows you to reposition the reCAPTCHA badge (i.e. logo and
‘protected by reCAPTCHA’ text) . Valid options as ‘bottomright’ (the default),
‘bottomleft’ or ‘inline’ which will put the badge directly above the button. If you
make the badge inline, you can control the CSS of the badge directly.

In case someone struggling with the recaptcha of contact form 7 (wordpress) here is a solution working for me
.wpcf7-recaptcha{
clear: both;
float: left;
}
.wpcf7-recaptcha{
margin-right: 6px;
width: 206px;
height: 65px;
overflow: hidden;
border-right: 1px solid #D3D3D3;
}
.wpcf7-recaptcha iframe{
padding-bottom: 15px;
border-bottom: 1px solid #D3D3D3;
background: #F9F9F9;
border-left: 1px solid #d3d3d3;
}

if you use scss, that worked for me:
.recaptcha > div{
transform: scale(0.84);
transform-origin: 0;
}

If someone is still interested, there is a simple javascript library (no jQuery dependency), named custom recaptcha. It lets you customize the button with css and implement some js events (ready/checked). The idea is to make the default recaptcha "invisible" and put a button over it. Just change the id of the recaptcha and that's it.
<head>
<script src="https://azentreprise.org/download/custom-recaptcha.min.js"></script>
<style type="text/css">
#captcha {
float: left;
margin: 2%;
background-color: rgba(72, 61, 139, 0.5); /* darkslateblue with 50% opacity */
border-radius: 2px;
font-size: 1em;
color: #C0FFEE;
}
#captcha.success {
background-color: rgba(50, 205, 50, 0.5); /* limegreen with 50% opacity */
color: limegreen;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="captcha" data-sitekey="your_site_key" data-label="Click here" data-label-spacing="15"></div>
</body>
See https://azentreprise.org/read.php?id=1 for more information.

I am just adding this kind of solution / quick fix so it won't get lost in case of a broken link.
Link to this solution "Want to add link How to resize the Google noCAPTCHA reCAPTCHA | The Geek Goddess" was provided by Vikram Singh Saini and simply outlines that you could use inline CSS to enforce framing of the iframe.
// Scale the frame using inline CSS
<div class="g-recaptcha" data-theme="light"
data-sitekey="XXXXXXXXXXXXX"
style="transform:scale(0.77);
-webkit-transform:scale(0.77);
transform-origin:0 0;
-webkit-transform-origin:0 0;
">
</div>
// Scale the images using a stylesheet
<style>
#rc-imageselect, .g-recaptcha {
transform:scale(0.77);
-webkit-transform:scale(0.77);
transform-origin:0 0;
-webkit-transform-origin:0 0;
}
</style>

You can use some CSS for Google reCAPTCHA v2 styling on your website:
– Change background, color of Google reCAPTCHA v2 widget:
.rc-anchor-light {
background: #fff!important;
color: #fff!important; }
or
.rc-anchor-normal{
background: #000 !important;
color: #000 !important; }
– Resize the Google reCAPTCHA v2 widget by using this snippet:
.rc-anchor-light {
transform:scale(0.9);
-webkit-transform:scale(0.9); }
– Responsive your Google reCAPTCHA v2:
#media only screen and (min-width: 768px) {
.rc-anchor-light {
transform:scale(0.85);
-webkit-transform:scale(0.85); }
}
All elements, property of CSS above that’s just for your reference. You can change them by yourself (only using CSS class selector).
Refer on OIW Blog - How To Edit CSS of Google reCAPTCHA (Re-style, Change Position, Resize reCAPTCHA Badge)
You can also find out Google reCAPTCHA v3's styling there.

A bit late but I tried this and it worked to make the Recaptcha responsive on screens smaller than 460px width. You can't use css selector to select elements inside the iframe. So, better use the outermost parent element which is the class g-recaptcha to basically zoom-out i.e transform the size of the entire container. Here's my code which worked:
#media(max-width:459.99px) {
.modal .g-recaptcha {
transform:scale(0.75);
-webkit-transform:scale(0.75); }
}
}

Incase someone wants to resize recaptcha for small devices.
I was using recaptcha V2 with primeng p-captcha (for angular). The issue was that for smaller screens it would go out of the screen.
Although you can't actually resize it (the external thing and all everyone has explained it above) but there is a way with transform property (scaling the the container)
this was my code below the way, I achieved it
p-captcha div div {
transform:scale(0.9) !important;
-webkit-transform:scale(0.9) !important;
transform-origin:0 0 !important;
-webkit-transform-origin:0 0 !important;
}
Other than p-captcha you can use this code snippet below
.g-recaptcha {
transform:scale(0.9);
transform-origin:0 0;
}
Before
After

Topic is old, but I also wanted to scale the reCAPTCHA widget -- but to make it bigger for phone users, unlike many others who wanted it smaller. The only way that worked was transform: scale(x), but that seemed to make the widget too wide for my page, thus shrinking the rest of the form on the page. Using a container div as shown below fixed my problem, and hopefully it will help someone else who thinks a bigger version is better on a small screen.
<style>
:root {
/* factor to scale the Google widget in potrait mode (on a phone) */
--recaptcha-scale: 2;
}
#media screen and (orientation: portrait) {
/* needed to rein in the width of inner div when it is scaled */
#g_recaptcha_div_container {
width: calc(100vmin / var(--recaptcha-scale));
}
#g_recaptcha_div {
transform: scale(var(--recaptcha-scale));
transform-origin: 0 0;
}
#submit_button {
width: 65vmin;
height: 9vmin;
font-size: 7vmin;
/* needed to scoot the button out from under the scaled div */
margin-top: 10vmin;
}
}
</style>
<html>
<!-- top of form with a bunch of fields to create an acct -->
<div id="g_recaptcha_div_container">
<div id="g_recaptcha_div" class="g-recaptcha" data-sitekey="foo">
</div>
</div>
<input id="submit_button" type="submit" value="Create Account">
<!-- bottom of form -->
</html>

You can try to color it with this css filter hack:
.colorize-pink {
filter: brightness(0.5) sepia(1) hue-rotate(-70deg) saturate(5);
}
.colorize-navy {
filter: brightness(0.2) sepia(1) hue-rotate(180deg) saturate(5);
}
and for the size, use transform css hack
.captcha-size {
transform:scale(0.8);transform-origin:0 0
}

Lets play a little with JavaScript:
First at all, we know that recaptcha badget include all the shit from the most crazy people on Google, so you can only make changes with theme "dark" and "light" on your web.
Take a look to my website
SantiagoSoñora.
let recaptcha = document.querySelector('.g-recaptcha');
With this, you only can touch simple settings of the badge, like z-index and size, but no much more...
So far, i made two functions that set data-theme to light or dark mode at innit. Note that its neccessary assign the "light" because Google not include that by default.
function reCaptchaDark() {
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', (event) => {
recaptcha.setAttribute("data-theme", "dark");
})
}
function reCaptchaLight() {
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', (event) => {
recaptcha.setAttribute("data-theme", "light");
})
}
Then, for example, my web looks if user prefers a dark or a light theme, and set that configurations to the recaptcha bag:
(theme.onLoad = function() {
if (window.matchMedia && window.matchMedia('(prefers-color-scheme: dark)').matches) {
reCaptchaDark();
toggleTheme();
}
else {
reCaptchaLight();
}
})();
Note that my code for toggle from dark to light is on the toggleTheme() function.
Keep doing magic: You should configure a class on the html tag or something else on your web for made the change between dark and light theme, and with that we now modify the src on the iframe so when we toggle dark/light mode ,with our button it changes:
theme.onclick = function() {
toggleTheme();
if (html.classList.contains('dark')) {
recaptcha.setAttribute("data-theme", "dark");
setTimeout(function() {
let iframes = document.querySelectorAll('iframe');
iframes[0].src = iframes[0].src.replace('&theme=light', '&theme=dark');
}, 0);
}
else {
recaptcha.setAttribute("data-theme", "light");
setTimeout(function() {
let iframes = document.querySelectorAll('iframe');
iframes[0].src = iframes[0].src.replace('&theme=dark', '&theme=light');
}, 0);
}
}
And here you go, the recaptcha badge change from dark to light "preassigned" themes by Google bad guys.
And last but not least, a function that updates the page to change if your theme is dark by default.
This update the LocalStorage
(function() {
if( window.localStorage ) {
if( !localStorage.getItem('firstLoad') ) {
localStorage['firstLoad'] = true;
window.location.reload();
}
else
localStorage.removeItem('firstLoad');
}
})();
You can use the class .grecaptcha-badge for some css changes, like opacity and box-shadow, -> (use !important)
Thats all, hope you can implement on your site

Edit cursor not displayed on Chrome in contenteditable

When you open this page (see Live demo) with Chrome :
<span id="myspan" contenteditable=true></span>
CSS :
#myspan { border: 0; outline: 0;}
JS :
$(myspan).focus();
the contenteditable span has focus (you can start to write things and you will see that it already had focus), but we don't see the "I" edit cursor.
How to make that this cursor is displayed ? (Remark : outline:0 is needed, as well as the fact that the span is empty even with no white space).
Note : With Firefox, the cursor is displayed.

The problem is that spans are inline elements. Just add display:block; to your CSS and it will fix the problem.
$(myspan).focus();
#myspan {
border: 0;
outline: 0;
display: block;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<span id="myspan" contenteditable=true></span>

I added padding to the left and the cursor appears.
#myspan
{
border: 0;
outline: 0;
min-width: 100px;
height: 30px;
padding-left: 1px;
}
Demo in jsFiddle

.cont_edit {
outline: 1px solid transparent;
}

This just has to do with the way an empty ContentEditable area is rendered. To prove it's not about the focus, add some text to your editable div, and then delete it. When the last character is gone, the cursor will disappear
From the question Setting the caret position to an empty node inside a contentEditable element
The selection/range model is based around indexes into text content, disregarding element boundaries. I believe it may be impossible to set the input focus inside an inline element with no text in it. Certainly with your example I cannot set focus inside the last element by clicking or arrow keys.
It almost works if you set each span to display: block, though there's still some highly strange behaviour, dependent on the existence of whitespace in the parent. Hacking the display to look inline with tricks like float, inline-block and absolute position make IE treat each element as a separate editing box. Relative-positioned block elements next to each other work, but that's probably impractical.
You could also try adding a zero-width character like 
document.getElementById('myspan').focus();
#myspan {
border: 0;
outline: 0;
}
<span id="myspan" contenteditable="true"></span>

The solution was to change <span> to <div> (I've seen that this solves many contenteditable problems in other questions here and there) + to add a min-width.
Indeed, with the following code, the size of the <div> would be 0px x 18px ! That explains why the caret (edit cursor) would be hidden !
HTML
<div id="blah" contenteditable=true></div>
CSS
#blah {
outline: 0;
position: absolute;
top:10px;
left:10px;
}
JS
$("#blah").focus();
Then, adding
min-width: 2px;
in the CSS will allow the caret to be displayed, even with Chrome : http://jsfiddle.net/38e9mkf4/2/

The issue I faced on Chrome v89.0.4389.90 was that contenteditable fields would sometimes show the blinking caret on focusin and sometimes not. I noticed it always blinks when there's already content in the field before focusing. It's when there's no content that the sometimes will/won't behavior occurs.
At first, I thought there must be some conflicting event handler that's erratically taking focus away. I disabled all my event binds and timers. Still the same erratic behavior. Then I thought it might be some conflicting CSS, so I disabled all stylesheets. At least now the behavior was consistent: the caret blinks 100% of the time when the field has content; the caret does not blink 100% of the time when the field has no content.
I enabled binds and stylesheets again. My div was already set to display: block; with min-width, min-height, and padding set in the final computed style set. None of the other answers here worked. I do have a placeholder on :empty:before that was a possible culprit. I commented that out. Now the behavior was consistent again, same as if the stylesheet was off. Oddly enough, the runnable snippet on SO works with the same computed CSS stack. I want to keep the placeholder, so it requires further research with my actual codebase...
The only solution I could get to work 100% of the time with my current issue involved forcibly placing the caret inside empty fields by creating a blank space and removing it immediately afterwards. Best I can do for a workaround until debugging the root cause.
//force caret to blink inside masks
let force_caret = function() {
if (!this.textContent) {
this.textContent = ' ';
let r = document.createRange(),
s = window.getSelection();
r.setStart(this.childNodes[0], 0);
r.collapse(true);
s.removeAllRanges();
s.addRange(r);
this.textContent = '';
}
}
//binds
let els = document.querySelectorAll("[contenteditable]");
for (let i = 0; i < els.length; i++) {
els[i].addEventListener('focusin', force_caret, false);
}
/* styles irrelevant to the issue, added for visual assist */
:root {
--b-soft: 1px solid silver;
--bs-in: inset 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3), 0 1px rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
--c-soft: gray;
--lg-warm: linear-gradient(30deg, rgb(254, 250, 250), #eedddd);
}
body {
font-family: system-ui, -apple-system, -apple-system-font, 'Segoe UI', 'Roboto', sans-serif;
}
[contenteditable] {
outline: initial;
}
[contenteditable][placeholder]:empty:before {
content: attr(placeholder);
color: var(--c-soft);
background-color: transparent;
font-style: italic;
opacity: .5;
font-size: .9em;
}
.input {
border-bottom: var(--b-soft);
padding: .2em .5em;
}
.input_mask {
display: flex;
align-items: baseline;
color: var(--c-soft);
}
.mask {
box-shadow: var(--bs-in);
border-radius: .2em;
background: var(--lg-warm);
font-weight: 500;
border: 1px solid transparent;
text-transform: uppercase;
/* styles possibly relevant to the issue according to other proposed solutions */
margin: 0 .4em .1em .4em;
padding: .2em .4em;
min-width: 3em;
min-height: 1em;
text-align: center;
}
<div data-type="tel" data-id="phone" class="input input_mask">
<span>+1 (</span>
<div maxlength="3" contenteditable="true" placeholder="111" class="mask"></div>
<span>)</span>
<div maxlength="3" contenteditable="true" placeholder="111" class="mask"></div>
<span>-</span>
<div maxlength="4" contenteditable="true" placeholder="1111" class="mask"></div>
<span>x</span>
<div maxlength="5" contenteditable="true" class="mask"></div>
</div>

Add a CSS style of
min-height: 15px;
you may also need
display: block;
to your contenteditable="true" tag

For me setting it content of contenteditable div to <br> works. I tried setting it to nbsp; but that creates extra character space in the div before i start editing. So, i choose this:
<div id="blah" contenteditable=true><br></div>
over:
<div id="blah" contenteditable=true>nbsp;</div>
Hope this helps.

I use Chrome and your Code works fine.
Try to use cursor: text; in your CSS. See here

How to make this working Java-script more efficient

I've got a working jQuery script that runs ok meaning it serves its purpose.
The question is: how to make this script more efficient?
Currently the script becomes active the moment a user places the mouse over (hover) a certain HTML5 section-tag with an ID. At this moment the script removes the existing class named 'noDisplay' from a subordinate nav-tag containing a submenu list, hence content becomes visible to the user. This submenu list may be three to four levels deep. The submenus are held in classes (subMenu1, subMenu2, subMenu3, subMenu4, etc.).
The script is written to serve individually each of the given section IDs and its sublevel classes.
Basically the script interacts with the DOM by removing the class 'noDisplay' upon mouse hover and restores the same class upon mouse leave.
(Tried to give a clear explanation. If not please ask.)
Here is a JSfiddle: enter link description here
I hope someone can suggest a way to do this much more efficiently.
Possibly with more sections (#ID's) and subMenu-levels (a class per level).
Using the CSS properties 'display: none;' and 'display:block;' would be the simplest solution but this is not desired because a search-bot my decide to skip content flagged as invisible to the user or a screenreader. The class 'NoDisplay' in use here keeps content invisible to users and keeps its readability to screen readers (and thus to most of the search bots).
So basically the script function remains as is to remove and add the class 'noDisplay' upon hover.
The goal is to obtain a script that is more efficient that could use for instance variables for each section, instead of writing code for each new section and hence extending the current script.
//section1$("#section1 .NavUL1 .subMenu1").hover(function(){
$(".NavUL2").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$(".NavUL2").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
$("#section1").hover(function(){
$("#section1 .NavUL1").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$("#section1 .NavUL1").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
$("#section1 .NavUL1 .subMenu1").hover(function(){
$(".NavUL2").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$(".NavUL2").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
//#section2
$("#section2").hover(function(){
$("#section2 .NavUL1").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$("#section2 .NavUL1").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
$("#section2 .subMenu1").hover(function(){
$(".subMenu1 .NavUL2").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$(".subMenu1 .NavUL2").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
$("#section2 .subMenu2").hover(function(){
$(".subMenu2 .NavUL2").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$(".subMenu2 .NavUL2").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
$("#section2 .subMenu3").hover(function(){
$(".subMenu3 .NavUL2").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$(".subMenu3 .NavUL2").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});
$("#section2 .subMenu4").hover(function(){
$(".subMenu4 .NavUL2").removeClass("noDisplay"); //display
},function(){
$(".subMenu4 .NavUL2").addClass("noDisplay"); //no display
});

My suggestion would be to create a new class, call it whatever but for demonstrative purposes we'll call it hover-class
Then it becomes simple:
$('.hover-class').hover(
function() { $(this).addClass('noDisplay'); },
function() { $(this).removeClass('noDisplay'); }
);

I'd recommend just using CSS, there shouldn't be a need for JS:
nav ul{
position: absolute;
border: 1px solid #444444;
box-shadow: 8px 8px 11px #222222;
background: #888;
padding: 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0em;
list-style-type: none;
margin-left: 15%;
display: none;
}
.sectionBox:hover nav > ul, nav li:hover > ul {
display: block;
}
This does away with all the IDs and classes while keeping the same effect. You html looks like this now (just a snippet):
<ul>
<li><h2>various whatever1</h2></li>
<li>link11</li>
<li>link12</li>
<li>link13</li>
<li>link14</li>
<li><h2>sub1</h2>
<ul>
<li>sub1-link11</li>
<li>sub1-link12</li>
<li>sub1-link13</li>
<li>sub1-link14</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Here it is working: http://jsfiddle.net/VGXNz/1/
Update:
If you want to use your original noDisplay styles then this would be the CSS:
nav ul{
position:absolute;
border: 0;
clip: rect(0 0 0 0);
width: 1px;
height: 1px;
margin: -1px;
overflow: hidden;
padding: 0;
}
.sectionBox:hover nav > ul, nav li:hover > ul{
height: auto;
width: auto;
margin: 0 0 0 15%;
border:1px solid #444444;
box-shadow:8px 8px 11px #222222;
background:#888;
padding:0.5em 0.5em 0.5em 0em;
list-style-type:none;
clip: auto;
overflow: visible;
}
Here's a fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/KKmVU/1/

why would you use js in the first place? Css is perfectly capable of handling hover states, and IMO you should always go for the css solution if there is one.
I made some quick (and dirty) changes to your fiddle:http://jsfiddle.net/3epRN/1/
I removed a bunch of classes and id's from the markup, removed all js, and tweaked the css a bit. The relevant css looks like this:
.sectionBox nav {
display: none;
}
.sectionBox:hover nav {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 90%;
left: 50px;
background-color:#646464;
z-index: 5;
}
.sectionBox nav ul ul {
display: none;
}
.sectionBox nav ul li {
position: relative;
}
.sectionBox nav ul li:hover ul {
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 80%;
background-color:#646464;
z-index: 5;
}
Obviously this needs some finetuning, but I'm sure you get the idea...
edit
I must admit I missed the part about the display:none beeing a problem for you. I do have to say I disagree with your arguments as to why (it is used al over the net, and crawlers and screen readers are smart enough nowadays).
That beeing said, nothing prevents you to use the css styling you now use to hide content (by adding the noDisplay class) directly in your css where I used the display:none;, and countering it when you want to display content by adding the following in stead of an ordinary display:block:
height: auto;
width: auto;
clip: auto;
overflow: visible;
The result would be identical to your js solution. I updated my fiddle to demonstrate:
http://jsfiddle.net/3epRN/2/

We Keep Coding

JavaScript is the programming language of the Web.