We Keep Coding

How to convert binary fraction to decimal

Javascript has the function parseInt() which can help convert integer in a binary form into its decimal equivalent:
parseInt("101", 2) // 5
However, I need to convert binary fraction to its decimal equivalent, like:
0.101 = 0.625
I can write my own function that would calculate the result like the following:
1 * Math.pow(2, -1) + 0*Math.pow(2, -2) + 1*Math.pow(2, -3) // 0.625
But I'm wondering whether there is anything standard already.

This question asks whether there is some JavaScript standard for parsing binary floating-point numbers, as if parseFloat() could have taken a second radix parameter to parse the binary number 0.101 like this: parseFloat('0.101', 2).
While there is no such standard, there is an easy and direct way to solve this.
If we represent the binary number 0.101 as a binary fraction, it is easily converted to a decimal fraction:
0.1012 = 1012/10002 = (5/8)10 = 0.625
The following one-line expression translates this to JavaScript. Here, num could be any type of binary number (represented as a string), including negative numbers:
parseInt(num.replace('.', ''), 2) / Math.pow(2, (num.split('.')[1] || '').length)
The solution is easily adapted to floating-point numbers in any base between 2 and 36, and we can wrap it in our own parseFloatRadix() function:
function parseFloatRadix(num, radix) {
return parseInt(num.replace('.', ''), radix) /
Math.pow(radix, (num.split('.')[1] || '').length)
}
test('0.101', 2, 0.625);
test('0.011', 2, 0.375);
test('0.0011', 2, 0.1875);
test('-011', 2, -3);
test('011', 2, 3);
test('-1100.0011', 2, -12.1875);
test('1100.0011', 2, 12.1875);
test('0.00011001100110011001100', 2, 0.09999990463256836);
test('ABC', 16, 2748);
test('-0.DEF', 16, -0.870849609375);
test('ABC.DEF', 16, 2748.870849609375);
test('-102.201', 3, -11.703703703703704);
test('-Z.ZZZ', 36, -35.99997856652949);
function test(num, radix, expected){
let result = parseFloatRadix(num, radix);
console.log(num + ' (base ' + radix +') --> ' + result +
(result === expected ? ' (OK)' : ' (Expected ' + expected + ')'));
}

You can split the number (as string) at the dot and treat the integer part with an own function and the fraction part with another function for the right value.
The solution works with other bases as well.
function convert(value, base = 2) {
var [integer, fraction = ''] = value.toString().split('.');
return parseInt(integer, base) + (integer[0] !== '-' || -1) * fraction
.split('')
.reduceRight((r, a) => (r + parseInt(a, base)) / base, 0);
}
console.log(convert(1100)); // 12
console.log(convert(0.0011)); // 0.1875
console.log(convert(1100.0011)); // 12.1875
console.log(convert('ABC', 16)); // 2748
console.log(convert('0.DEF', 16)); // 0.870849609375
console.log(convert('ABC.DEF', 16)); // 2748.870849609375
console.log(convert('-ABC.DEF', 16)); // -2748.870849609375
console.log(convert(-1100.0011)); // -12.1875
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

TL;DR:
const convert = (s, b) => (+((s = s.toString().trim().split("."))[0][0] !== "-") || -1) * ((parseInt(s[0].replace("-", ""), (b = +b || 2))) + (s[1].split("").reduceRight((n, d) => (n + parseInt(d, b)) / b, 0)));
Nina Scholz has a nice example, but it doesn't work with negative numbers (plus other issues).
So, this is an improved one:
/**
* #param {string} input
* #param {number} [base]
* #returns {number}
*/
function convert(input, base = 2) {
const [ integerRaw, decimalRaw = "" ] = input.toString().trim().split(".");
const integer = parseInt(integerRaw.replace("-", ""), base);
const decimal = decimalRaw.split("").reduceRight((sum, num) => (sum + parseInt(num, base)) / base, 0);
return (integerRaw.startsWith("-") ? -1 : 1) * (integer + decimal);
}
convert("1100.0011"); // 12.1875
convert("-1100.0011"); // -12.1875
convert("-Z.ZZZ", 36); // -35.99997856652949
As I know, JavaScript doesn't provide such built-in functionality.

But I'm wondering whether there is anything standard already.
No according my knowledge
I think you need to create your own function:
function toDecimal(string, radix) {
radix = radix || 2;
var s = string.split('.');
var decimal = parseInt(s[0], radix);
if(s.length > 1){
var fract = s[1].split('');
for(var i = 0, div = radix; i < fract.length; i++, div = div * radix) {
decimal = decimal + fract[i] / div;
}
}
return decimal;
}

You can create javascript extension method like parseInt as I have created method parseBinary which works just link parseInt.
String.prototype.parseBinary = function parseBinary() {
var radix = 2;
var s = this.split('.');
var decimal = parseInt(s[0], radix);
if(s.length > 1){
var fract = s[1].split('');
for(var i = 0, div = radix; i < fract.length; i++, div = div * radix)
{
decimal = decimal + fract[i] / div;
}
}
return decimal;
};
To use this method you can call it using following code.
var str = "0.101";
alert(str.parseBinary());
Here is a working example of javascript code
String.prototype.parseBinary = function parseBinary() {
var radix = 2;
var s = this.split('.');
var decimal = parseInt(s[0], radix);
if(s.length > 1){
var fract = s[1].split('');
for(var i = 0, div = radix; i < fract.length; i++, div = div * radix)
{
decimal = decimal + fract[i] / div;
}
}
return decimal;
};
var str = "0.101";
alert(str.parseBinary());

My logic behind is parseInt(res[0] + res[1], base) / Math.pow(base, res[1].length);
Ex :
var fValue = '-1100.0011';
var result= parseInt('-11000011', base) / Math.pow(base, '0011'.length);
<script>
parseFractionInt = (value, base = 2) => {
var res = value.split('.');
return res.length < 2 ?
parseInt(value, base) :
parseInt(res[0] + res[1], base) / Math.pow(base, res[1].length);
}
console.log(parseFractionInt('0.101')); //0.625
console.log(parseFractionInt('1100')); // 12
console.log(parseFractionInt('0.0011')); // 0.1875
console.log(parseFractionInt('1100.0011')); // 12.1875
console.log(parseFractionInt('ABC', 16)); // 2748
console.log(parseFractionInt('0.DEF', 16)); // 0.870849609375
console.log(parseFractionInt('ABC.DEF', 16)); // 2748.870849609375
console.log(parseFractionInt('-ABC.DEF', 16)); // -2748.870849609375
console.log(parseFractionInt('-1100.0011')); // -12.1875
console.log(parseFractionInt('G.G', 16)); //NaN
console.log(parseFractionInt('A.G', 16)); //0.625
</script>

convert whole number to a decimal javascript [duplicate]

I have this line of code which rounds my numbers to two decimal places. But I get numbers like this: 10.8, 2.4, etc. These are not my idea of two decimal places so how I can improve the following?
Math.round(price*Math.pow(10,2))/Math.pow(10,2);
I want numbers like 10.80, 2.40, etc. Use of jQuery is fine with me.

To format a number using fixed-point notation, you can simply use the toFixed method:
(10.8).toFixed(2); // "10.80"
var num = 2.4;
alert(num.toFixed(2)); // "2.40"
Note that toFixed() returns a string.
IMPORTANT: Note that toFixed does not round 90% of the time, it will return the rounded value, but for many cases, it doesn't work.
For instance:
2.005.toFixed(2) === "2.00"
UPDATE:
Nowadays, you can use the Intl.NumberFormat constructor. It's part of the ECMAScript Internationalization API Specification (ECMA402). It has pretty good browser support, including even IE11, and it is fully supported in Node.js.
const formatter = new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', {
minimumFractionDigits: 2,
maximumFractionDigits: 2,
});
console.log(formatter.format(2.005)); // "2.01"
console.log(formatter.format(1.345)); // "1.35"
You can alternatively use the toLocaleString method, which internally will use the Intl API:
const format = (num, decimals) => num.toLocaleString('en-US', {
minimumFractionDigits: 2,
maximumFractionDigits: 2,
});
console.log(format(2.005)); // "2.01"
console.log(format(1.345)); // "1.35"
This API also provides you a wide variety of options to format, like thousand separators, currency symbols, etc.

This is an old topic but still top-ranked Google results and the solutions offered share the same floating point decimals issue. Here is the (very generic) function I use, thanks to MDN:
function round(value, exp) {
if (typeof exp === 'undefined' || +exp === 0)
return Math.round(value);
value = +value;
exp = +exp;
if (isNaN(value) || !(typeof exp === 'number' && exp % 1 === 0))
return NaN;
// Shift
value = value.toString().split('e');
value = Math.round(+(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] + exp) : exp)));
// Shift back
value = value.toString().split('e');
return +(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] - exp) : -exp));
}
As we can see, we don't get these issues:
round(1.275, 2); // Returns 1.28
round(1.27499, 2); // Returns 1.27
This genericity also provides some cool stuff:
round(1234.5678, -2); // Returns 1200
round(1.2345678e+2, 2); // Returns 123.46
round("123.45"); // Returns 123
Now, to answer the OP's question, one has to type:
round(10.8034, 2).toFixed(2); // Returns "10.80"
round(10.8, 2).toFixed(2); // Returns "10.80"
Or, for a more concise, less generic function:
function round2Fixed(value) {
value = +value;
if (isNaN(value))
return NaN;
// Shift
value = value.toString().split('e');
value = Math.round(+(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] + 2) : 2)));
// Shift back
value = value.toString().split('e');
return (+(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] - 2) : -2))).toFixed(2);
}
You can call it with:
round2Fixed(10.8034); // Returns "10.80"
round2Fixed(10.8); // Returns "10.80"
Various examples and tests (thanks to #t-j-crowder!):
function round(value, exp) {
if (typeof exp === 'undefined' || +exp === 0)
return Math.round(value);
value = +value;
exp = +exp;
if (isNaN(value) || !(typeof exp === 'number' && exp % 1 === 0))
return NaN;
// Shift
value = value.toString().split('e');
value = Math.round(+(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] + exp) : exp)));
// Shift back
value = value.toString().split('e');
return +(value[0] + 'e' + (value[1] ? (+value[1] - exp) : -exp));
}
function naive(value, exp) {
if (!exp) {
return Math.round(value);
}
var pow = Math.pow(10, exp);
return Math.round(value * pow) / pow;
}
function test(val, places) {
subtest(val, places);
val = typeof val === "string" ? "-" + val : -val;
subtest(val, places);
}
function subtest(val, places) {
var placesOrZero = places || 0;
var naiveResult = naive(val, places);
var roundResult = round(val, places);
if (placesOrZero >= 0) {
naiveResult = naiveResult.toFixed(placesOrZero);
roundResult = roundResult.toFixed(placesOrZero);
} else {
naiveResult = naiveResult.toString();
roundResult = roundResult.toString();
}
$("<tr>")
.append($("<td>").text(JSON.stringify(val)))
.append($("<td>").text(placesOrZero))
.append($("<td>").text(naiveResult))
.append($("<td>").text(roundResult))
.appendTo("#results");
}
test(0.565, 2);
test(0.575, 2);
test(0.585, 2);
test(1.275, 2);
test(1.27499, 2);
test(1234.5678, -2);
test(1.2345678e+2, 2);
test("123.45");
test(10.8034, 2);
test(10.8, 2);
test(1.005, 2);
test(1.0005, 2);
table {
border-collapse: collapse;
}
table, td, th {
border: 1px solid #ddd;
}
td, th {
padding: 4px;
}
th {
font-weight: normal;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
td {
font-family: monospace;
}
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Input</th>
<th>Places</th>
<th>Naive</th>
<th>Thorough</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody id="results">
</tbody>
</table>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

I usually add this to my personal library, and after some suggestions and using the #TIMINeutron solution too, and making it adaptable for decimal length then, this one fits best:
function precise_round(num, decimals) {
var t = Math.pow(10, decimals);
return (Math.round((num * t) + (decimals>0?1:0)*(Math.sign(num) * (10 / Math.pow(100, decimals)))) / t).toFixed(decimals);
}
will work for the exceptions reported.

FAST AND EASY
parseFloat(number.toFixed(2))
Example
let number = 2.55435930
let roundedString = number.toFixed(2) // "2.55"
let twoDecimalsNumber = parseFloat(roundedString) // 2.55
let directly = parseFloat(number.toFixed(2)) // 2.55

One way to be 100% sure that you get a number with 2 decimals:
(Math.round(num*100)/100).toFixed(2)
If this causes rounding errors, you can use the following as James has explained in his comment:
(Math.round((num * 1000)/10)/100).toFixed(2)

I don't know why can't I add a comment to a previous answer (maybe I'm hopelessly blind, I don't know), but I came up with a solution using #Miguel's answer:
function precise_round(num,decimals) {
return Math.round(num*Math.pow(10, decimals)) / Math.pow(10, decimals);
}
And its two comments (from #bighostkim and #Imre):
Problem with precise_round(1.275,2) not returning 1.28
Problem with precise_round(6,2) not returning 6.00 (as he wanted).
My final solution is as follows:
function precise_round(num,decimals) {
var sign = num >= 0 ? 1 : -1;
return (Math.round((num*Math.pow(10,decimals)) + (sign*0.001)) / Math.pow(10,decimals)).toFixed(decimals);
}
As you can see I had to add a little bit of "correction" (it's not what it is, but since Math.round is lossy - you can check it on jsfiddle.net - this is the only way I knew how to "fix" it). It adds 0.001 to the already padded number, so it is adding a 1 three 0s to the right of the decimal value. So it should be safe to use.
After that I added .toFixed(decimal) to always output the number in the correct format (with the right amount of decimals).
So that's pretty much it. Use it well ;)
EDIT: added functionality to the "correction" of negative numbers.

toFixed(n) provides n length after the decimal point; toPrecision(x)
provides x total length.
Use this method below
// Example: toPrecision(4) when the number has 7 digits (3 before, 4 after)
// It will round to the tenths place
num = 500.2349;
result = num.toPrecision(4); // result will equal 500.2
AND if you want the number to be fixed use
result = num.toFixed(2);

I didn't find an accurate solution for this problem, so I created my own:
function inprecise_round(value, decPlaces) {
return Math.round(value*Math.pow(10,decPlaces))/Math.pow(10,decPlaces);
}
function precise_round(value, decPlaces){
var val = value * Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
var fraction = (Math.round((val-parseInt(val))*10)/10);
//this line is for consistency with .NET Decimal.Round behavior
// -342.055 => -342.06
if(fraction == -0.5) fraction = -0.6;
val = Math.round(parseInt(val) + fraction) / Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
return val;
}
Examples:
function inprecise_round(value, decPlaces) {
return Math.round(value * Math.pow(10, decPlaces)) / Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
}
function precise_round(value, decPlaces) {
var val = value * Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
var fraction = (Math.round((val - parseInt(val)) * 10) / 10);
//this line is for consistency with .NET Decimal.Round behavior
// -342.055 => -342.06
if (fraction == -0.5) fraction = -0.6;
val = Math.round(parseInt(val) + fraction) / Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
return val;
}
// This may produce different results depending on the browser environment
console.log("342.055.toFixed(2) :", 342.055.toFixed(2)); // 342.06 on Chrome & IE10
console.log("inprecise_round(342.055, 2):", inprecise_round(342.055, 2)); // 342.05
console.log("precise_round(342.055, 2) :", precise_round(342.055, 2)); // 342.06
console.log("precise_round(-342.055, 2) :", precise_round(-342.055, 2)); // -342.06
console.log("inprecise_round(0.565, 2) :", inprecise_round(0.565, 2)); // 0.56
console.log("precise_round(0.565, 2) :", precise_round(0.565, 2)); // 0.57

Here's a simple one
function roundFloat(num,dec){
var d = 1;
for (var i=0; i<dec; i++){
d += "0";
}
return Math.round(num * d) / d;
}
Use like alert(roundFloat(1.79209243929,4));
Jsfiddle

Round down
function round_down(value, decPlaces) {
return Math.floor(value * Math.pow(10, decPlaces)) / Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
}
Round up
function round_up(value, decPlaces) {
return Math.ceil(value * Math.pow(10, decPlaces)) / Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
}
Round nearest
function round_nearest(value, decPlaces) {
return Math.round(value * Math.pow(10, decPlaces)) / Math.pow(10, decPlaces);
}
Merged https://stackoverflow.com/a/7641824/1889449 and
https://www.kirupa.com/html5/rounding_numbers_in_javascript.htm Thanks
them.

Building on top of Christian C. Salvadó's answer, doing the following will output a Number type, and also seems to be dealing with rounding well:
const roundNumberToTwoDecimalPlaces = (num) => Number(new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US', {
minimumFractionDigits: 2,
maximumFractionDigits: 2,
}).format(num));
roundNumberToTwoDecimalPlaces(1.344); // => 1.34
roundNumberToTwoDecimalPlaces(1.345); // => 1.35
The difference between the above and what has already been mentioned is that you don't need the .format() chaining when you're using it[, and that it outputs a Number type].

#heridev and I created a small function in jQuery.
You can try next:
HTML
<input type="text" name="one" class="two-digits"><br>
<input type="text" name="two" class="two-digits">​
jQuery
// apply the two-digits behaviour to elements with 'two-digits' as their class
$( function() {
$('.two-digits').keyup(function(){
if($(this).val().indexOf('.')!=-1){
if($(this).val().split(".")[1].length > 2){
if( isNaN( parseFloat( this.value ) ) ) return;
this.value = parseFloat(this.value).toFixed(2);
}
}
return this; //for chaining
});
});
​
DEMO ONLINE:
http://jsfiddle.net/c4Wqn/

The trouble with floating point values is that they are trying to represent an infinite amount of (continuous) values with a fixed amount of bits. So naturally, there must be some loss in play, and you're going to be bitten with some values.
When a computer stores 1.275 as a floating point value, it won't actually remember whether it was 1.275 or 1.27499999999999993, or even 1.27500000000000002. These values should give different results after rounding to two decimals, but they won't, since for computer they look exactly the same after storing as floating point values, and there's no way to restore the lost data. Any further calculations will only accumulate such imprecision.
So, if precision matters, you have to avoid floating point values from the start. The simplest options are to
use a devoted library
use strings for storing and passing around the values (accompanied by string operations)
use integers (e.g. you could be passing around the amount of hundredths of your actual value, e.g. amount in cents instead of amount in dollars)
For example, when using integers to store the number of hundredths, the function for finding the actual value is quite simple:
function descale(num, decimals) {
var hasMinus = num < 0;
var numString = Math.abs(num).toString();
var precedingZeroes = '';
for (var i = numString.length; i <= decimals; i++) {
precedingZeroes += '0';
}
numString = precedingZeroes + numString;
return (hasMinus ? '-' : '')
+ numString.substr(0, numString.length-decimals)
+ '.'
+ numString.substr(numString.length-decimals);
}
alert(descale(127, 2));
With strings, you'll need rounding, but it's still manageable:
function precise_round(num, decimals) {
var parts = num.split('.');
var hasMinus = parts.length > 0 && parts[0].length > 0 && parts[0].charAt(0) == '-';
var integralPart = parts.length == 0 ? '0' : (hasMinus ? parts[0].substr(1) : parts[0]);
var decimalPart = parts.length > 1 ? parts[1] : '';
if (decimalPart.length > decimals) {
var roundOffNumber = decimalPart.charAt(decimals);
decimalPart = decimalPart.substr(0, decimals);
if ('56789'.indexOf(roundOffNumber) > -1) {
var numbers = integralPart + decimalPart;
var i = numbers.length;
var trailingZeroes = '';
var justOneAndTrailingZeroes = true;
do {
i--;
var roundedNumber = '1234567890'.charAt(parseInt(numbers.charAt(i)));
if (roundedNumber === '0') {
trailingZeroes += '0';
} else {
numbers = numbers.substr(0, i) + roundedNumber + trailingZeroes;
justOneAndTrailingZeroes = false;
break;
}
} while (i > 0);
if (justOneAndTrailingZeroes) {
numbers = '1' + trailingZeroes;
}
integralPart = numbers.substr(0, numbers.length - decimals);
decimalPart = numbers.substr(numbers.length - decimals);
}
} else {
for (var i = decimalPart.length; i < decimals; i++) {
decimalPart += '0';
}
}
return (hasMinus ? '-' : '') + integralPart + (decimals > 0 ? '.' + decimalPart : '');
}
alert(precise_round('1.275', 2));
alert(precise_round('1.27499999999999993', 2));
Note that this function rounds to nearest, ties away from zero, while IEEE 754 recommends rounding to nearest, ties to even as the default behavior for floating point operations. Such modifications are left as an exercise for the reader :)

Round your decimal value, then use toFixed(x) for your expected digit(s).
function parseDecimalRoundAndFixed(num,dec){
var d = Math.pow(10,dec);
return (Math.round(num * d) / d).toFixed(dec);
}
Call
parseDecimalRoundAndFixed(10.800243929,4) => 10.80
parseDecimalRoundAndFixed(10.807243929,2) => 10.81

Number(Math.round(1.005+'e2')+'e-2'); // 1.01
This worked for me: Rounding Decimals in JavaScript

With these examples you will still get an error when trying to round the number 1.005 the solution is to either use a library like Math.js or this function:
function round(value: number, decimals: number) {
return Number(Math.round(value + 'e' + decimals) + 'e-' + decimals);
}

Here is my 1-line solution: Number((yourNumericValueHere).toFixed(2));
Here's what happens:
1) First, you apply .toFixed(2) onto the number that you want to round off the decimal places of. Note that this will convert the value to a string from number. So if you are using Typescript, it will throw an error like this:
"Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'number'"
2) To get back the numeric value or to convert the string to numeric value, simply apply the Number() function on that so-called 'string' value.
For clarification, look at the example below:
EXAMPLE:
I have an amount that has upto 5 digits in the decimal places and I would like to shorten it to upto 2 decimal places. I do it like so:
var price = 0.26453;
var priceRounded = Number((price).toFixed(2));
console.log('Original Price: ' + price);
console.log('Price Rounded: ' + priceRounded);

In general, decimal rounding is done by scaling: round(num * p) / p
Naive implementation
Using the following function with halfway numbers, you will get either the upper rounded value as expected, or the lower rounded value sometimes depending on the input.
This inconsistency in rounding may introduce hard to detect bugs in the client code.
function naiveRound(num, decimalPlaces) {
var p = Math.pow(10, decimalPlaces);
return Math.round(num * p) / p;
}
console.log( naiveRound(1.245, 2) ); // 1.25 correct (rounded as expected)
console.log( naiveRound(1.255, 2) ); // 1.25 incorrect (should be 1.26)
Better implementations
By converting the number to a string in the exponential notation, positive numbers are rounded as expected.
But, be aware that negative numbers round differently than positive numbers.
In fact, it performs what is basically equivalent to "round half up" as the rule, you will see that round(-1.005, 2) evaluates to -1 even though round(1.005, 2) evaluates to 1.01. The lodash _.round method uses this technique.
/**
* Round half up ('round half towards positive infinity')
* Uses exponential notation to avoid floating-point issues.
* Negative numbers round differently than positive numbers.
*/
function round(num, decimalPlaces) {
num = Math.round(num + "e" + decimalPlaces);
return Number(num + "e" + -decimalPlaces);
}
// test rounding of half
console.log( round(0.5, 0) ); // 1
console.log( round(-0.5, 0) ); // 0
// testing edge cases
console.log( round(1.005, 2) ); // 1.01
console.log( round(2.175, 2) ); // 2.18
console.log( round(5.015, 2) ); // 5.02
console.log( round(-1.005, 2) ); // -1
console.log( round(-2.175, 2) ); // -2.17
console.log( round(-5.015, 2) ); // -5.01
If you want the usual behavior when rounding negative numbers, you would need to convert negative numbers to positive before calling Math.round(), and then convert them back to negative numbers before returning.
// Round half away from zero
function round(num, decimalPlaces) {
num = Math.round(Math.abs(num) + "e" + decimalPlaces) * Math.sign(num);
return Number(num + "e" + -decimalPlaces);
}
There is a different purely mathematical technique to perform round-to-nearest (using "round half away from zero"), in which epsilon correction is applied before calling the rounding function.
Simply, we add the smallest possible float value (= 1.0 ulp; unit in the last place) to the number before rounding. This moves to the next representable value after the number, away from zero.
/**
* Round half away from zero ('commercial' rounding)
* Uses correction to offset floating-point inaccuracies.
* Works symmetrically for positive and negative numbers.
*/
function round(num, decimalPlaces) {
var p = Math.pow(10, decimalPlaces);
var e = Number.EPSILON * num * p;
return Math.round((num * p) + e) / p;
}
// test rounding of half
console.log( round(0.5, 0) ); // 1
console.log( round(-0.5, 0) ); // -1
// testing edge cases
console.log( round(1.005, 2) ); // 1.01
console.log( round(2.175, 2) ); // 2.18
console.log( round(5.015, 2) ); // 5.02
console.log( round(-1.005, 2) ); // -1.01
console.log( round(-2.175, 2) ); // -2.18
console.log( round(-5.015, 2) ); // -5.02
This is needed to offset the implicit round-off error that may occur during encoding of decimal numbers, particularly those having "5" in the last decimal position, like 1.005, 2.675 and 16.235. Actually, 1.005 in decimal system is encoded to 1.0049999999999999 in 64-bit binary float; while, 1234567.005 in decimal system is encoded to 1234567.0049999998882413 in 64-bit binary float.
It is worth noting that the maximum binary round-off error is dependent upon (1) the magnitude of the number and (2) the relative machine epsilon (2^-52).

Put the following in some global scope:
Number.prototype.getDecimals = function ( decDigCount ) {
return this.toFixed(decDigCount);
}
and then try:
var a = 56.23232323;
a.getDecimals(2); // will return 56.23
Update
Note that toFixed() can only work for the number of decimals between 0-20 i.e. a.getDecimals(25) may generate a javascript error, so to accomodate that you may add some additional check i.e.
Number.prototype.getDecimals = function ( decDigCount ) {
return ( decDigCount > 20 ) ? this : this.toFixed(decDigCount);
}

Number(((Math.random() * 100) + 1).toFixed(2))
this will return a random number from 1 to 100 rounded to 2 decimal places.

Using this response by reference: https://stackoverflow.com/a/21029698/454827
I build a function to get dynamic numbers of decimals:
function toDec(num, dec)
{
if(typeof dec=='undefined' || dec<0)
dec = 2;
var tmp = dec + 1;
for(var i=1; i<=tmp; i++)
num = num * 10;
num = num / 10;
num = Math.round(num);
for(var i=1; i<=dec; i++)
num = num / 10;
num = num.toFixed(dec);
return num;
}
here working example: https://jsfiddle.net/wpxLduLc/

parse = function (data) {
data = Math.round(data*Math.pow(10,2))/Math.pow(10,2);
if (data != null) {
var lastone = data.toString().split('').pop();
if (lastone != '.') {
data = parseFloat(data);
}
}
return data;
};
$('#result').html(parse(200)); // output 200
$('#result1').html(parse(200.1)); // output 200.1
$('#result2').html(parse(200.10)); // output 200.1
$('#result3').html(parse(200.109)); // output 200.11
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.0.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div id="result"></div>
<div id="result1"></div>
<div id="result2"></div>
<div id="result3"></div>

I got some ideas from this post a few months back, but none of the answers here, nor answers from other posts/blogs could handle all the scenarios (e.g. negative numbers and some "lucky numbers" our tester found). In the end, our tester did not find any problem with this method below. Pasting a snippet of my code:
fixPrecision: function (value) {
var me = this,
nan = isNaN(value),
precision = me.decimalPrecision;
if (nan || !value) {
return nan ? '' : value;
} else if (!me.allowDecimals || precision <= 0) {
precision = 0;
}
//[1]
//return parseFloat(Ext.Number.toFixed(parseFloat(value), precision));
precision = precision || 0;
var negMultiplier = value < 0 ? -1 : 1;
//[2]
var numWithExp = parseFloat(value + "e" + precision);
var roundedNum = parseFloat(Math.round(Math.abs(numWithExp)) + 'e-' + precision) * negMultiplier;
return parseFloat(roundedNum.toFixed(precision));
},
I also have code comments (sorry i forgot all the details already)...I'm posting my answer here for future reference:
9.995 * 100 = 999.4999999999999
Whereas 9.995e2 = 999.5
This discrepancy causes Math.round(9.995 * 100) = 999 instead of 1000.
Use e notation instead of multiplying /dividing by Math.Pow(10,precision).

I'm fix the problem the modifier.
Support 2 decimal only.
$(function(){
//input number only.
convertNumberFloatZero(22); // output : 22.00
convertNumberFloatZero(22.5); // output : 22.50
convertNumberFloatZero(22.55); // output : 22.55
convertNumberFloatZero(22.556); // output : 22.56
convertNumberFloatZero(22.555); // output : 22.55
convertNumberFloatZero(22.5541); // output : 22.54
convertNumberFloatZero(22222.5541); // output : 22,222.54
function convertNumberFloatZero(number){
if(!$.isNumeric(number)){
return 'NaN';
}
var numberFloat = number.toFixed(3);
var splitNumber = numberFloat.split(".");
var cNumberFloat = number.toFixed(2);
var cNsplitNumber = cNumberFloat.split(".");
var lastChar = splitNumber[1].substr(splitNumber[1].length - 1);
if(lastChar > 0 && lastChar < 5){
cNsplitNumber[1]--;
}
return Number(splitNumber[0]).toLocaleString('en').concat('.').concat(cNsplitNumber[1]);
};
});
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script>

(Math.round((10.2)*100)/100).toFixed(2)
That should yield: 10.20
(Math.round((.05)*100)/100).toFixed(2)
That should yield: 0.05
(Math.round((4.04)*100)/100).toFixed(2)
That should yield: 4.04
etc.

/*Due to all told stuff. You may do 2 things for different purposes:
When showing/printing stuff use this in your alert/innerHtml= contents:
YourRebelNumber.toFixed(2)*/
var aNumber=9242.16;
var YourRebelNumber=aNumber-9000;
alert(YourRebelNumber);
alert(YourRebelNumber.toFixed(2));
/*and when comparing use:
Number(YourRebelNumber.toFixed(2))*/
if(YourRebelNumber==242.16)alert("Not Rounded");
if(Number(YourRebelNumber.toFixed(2))==242.16)alert("Rounded");
/*Number will behave as you want in that moment. After that, it'll return to its defiance.
*/

This is very simple and works just as well as any of the others:
function parseNumber(val, decimalPlaces) {
if (decimalPlaces == null) decimalPlaces = 0
var ret = Number(val).toFixed(decimalPlaces)
return Number(ret)
}
Since toFixed() can only be called on numbers, and unfortunately returns a string, this does all the parsing for you in both directions. You can pass a string or a number, and you get a number back every time! Calling parseNumber(1.49) will give you 1, and parseNumber(1.49,2) will give you 1.50. Just like the best of 'em!

You could also use the .toPrecision() method and some custom code, and always round up to the nth decimal digit regardless the length of int part.
function glbfrmt (number, decimals, seperator) {
return typeof number !== 'number' ? number : number.toPrecision( number.toString().split(seperator)[0].length + decimals);
}
You could also make it a plugin for a better use.

Here's a TypeScript implementation of https://stackoverflow.com/a/21323330/916734. It also dries things up with functions, and allows for a optional digit offset.
export function round(rawValue: number | string, precision = 0, fractionDigitOffset = 0): number | string {
const value = Number(rawValue);
if (isNaN(value)) return rawValue;
precision = Number(precision);
if (precision % 1 !== 0) return NaN;
let [ stringValue, exponent ] = scientificNotationToParts(value);
let shiftExponent = exponentForPrecision(exponent, precision, Shift.Right);
const enlargedValue = toScientificNotation(stringValue, shiftExponent);
const roundedValue = Math.round(enlargedValue);
[ stringValue, exponent ] = scientificNotationToParts(roundedValue);
const precisionWithOffset = precision + fractionDigitOffset;
shiftExponent = exponentForPrecision(exponent, precisionWithOffset, Shift.Left);
return toScientificNotation(stringValue, shiftExponent);
}
enum Shift {
Left = -1,
Right = 1,
}
function scientificNotationToParts(value: number): Array<string> {
const [ stringValue, exponent ] = value.toString().split('e');
return [ stringValue, exponent ];
}
function exponentForPrecision(exponent: string, precision: number, shift: Shift): number {
precision = shift * precision;
return exponent ? (Number(exponent) + precision) : precision;
}
function toScientificNotation(value: string, exponent: number): number {
return Number(`${value}e${exponent}`);
}

fun Any.twoDecimalPlaces(numInDouble: Double): String {
return "%.2f".format(numInDouble)
}

Fix Javascript Value to 0 decimals

I have this script which is working in formatting my currency but now its not fixing my value to 0 decimal places, Im new to javascript so could anybody explain where and hwo I'd do this? Thanks
function FormatNumberBy3(num, decpoint, sep) {
// check for missing parameters and use defaults if so
if (arguments.length == 2) {
sep = ",";
}
if (arguments.length == 1) {
sep = ",";
decpoint = ".";
}
// need a string for operations
num = num.toString();
// separate the whole number and the fraction if possible
a = num.split(decpoint);
x = a[0]; // decimal
y = a[1]; // fraction
z = "";
if (typeof(x) != "undefined") {
// reverse the digits. regexp works from left to right.
for (i=x.length-1;i>=0;i--)
z += x.charAt(i);
// add seperators. but undo the trailing one, if there
z = z.replace(/(\d{3})/g, "$1" + sep);
if (z.slice(-sep.length) == sep)
z = z.slice(0, -sep.length);
x = "";
// reverse again to get back the number
for (i=z.length-1;i>=0;i--)
x += z.charAt(i);
// add the fraction back in, if it was there
if (typeof(y) != "undefined" && y.length > 0)
x += decpoint + y;
}
return x;
}

I may be misunderstanding your question, but it sounds like you want Math.floor()
http://www.javascripter.net/faq/mathfunc.htm

You can round numbers mathematically, which is much, much faster and much, much, much simpler. There are literally hundreds of examples of this algorithm all over this site alone.
function round(number, places)
{
var multiplicator = Math.pow(10, places);
return Math.round(number * multiplicator) / multiplicator;
}
alert(round(123.456, 0)); // alerts "123"
This function lets you round to an arbitrary decimal place. If you want to round to the nearest integer, you may simply use Math.round(x).
Math.round rounds a decimal number to the nearest integer. Assuming you want to keep 3 decimal places, all you have to do is multiply the decimal number by 1000 (which is 10 power 3), round to the nearest integer, then divide by 1000. This is what this snippet does.

Your function appears to work for me... I assume the result of passing "1000" as an argument should be "1,000"? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "fixing [your] value to 0 decimal places".
Here's a function I wrote to format numbers (like your above function does) for an API once:
function num_format(str) {
if (typeof str !== 'string' || /[^\d,\.e+-]/.test(str)) {
if (typeof str === 'number') {
str = str.toString();
} else {
throw new TypeError("Argument is not a string with a number in it");
}
}
var reg = /(\d+)(\d{3})/;
str = str.split(".");
while (reg.test(str[0])) {
str[0] = str[0].replace(reg, "$1,$2");
}
return str.join(".");
}
Remove the error checking code and it becomes quite a short little function (five lines). Pass it any number and it will format it correctly, although I didn't allow the option of specifying the separators.
As for rounding numbers to arbitrary decimal places, I suggest seeing zneak's answer above. Then would simply do:
num_format(round("100000.12341234", 2));
Which would give a result of "100,000.12".

This function should be capable of all various scenarios:
function formatNumber(num, precision, sep, thousand, addTrailing0) {
if (isNaN(num))
return "";
if (isNaN(precision))
precision = 2;
if (typeof addTrailing0 == "undefined")
addTrailing0 = true;
var factor = Math.pow(10, precision);
num = String(Math.round(num * factor) / factor);
if (addTrailing0 && precision > 0) {
if (num.indexOf(".") < 0)
num += ".";
for (var length = num.substr(num.indexOf(".")+1).length; length < precision; ++length)
num += "0";
}
var parts = num.split(".");
parts[0] = parts[0].split("").reverse().join("").replace(/(\d{3})(?=\d)/g, "$1" + (thousand || ",")).split("").reverse().join("");
num = parts[0] + (parts.length > 1 ? (sep || ".") + parts[1] : "");
//debug:
document.write(num + "<br />");
return num;
}
Examples:
formatNumber(32432342342.3574, 0); // 32,432,342,342
formatNumber(32432342342.3574, 2); // 32,432,342,342.36
formatNumber(1342.525423, 4, ".", ","); // 1,342.5254
formatNumber(1342.525423, 2, ",", "."); // 1.342,53
formatNumber(1342.525423); // 1,342.53
formatNumber(1342.525423, 0); // 1,343
formatNumber(342.525423, 8); // 342.52542300
formatNumber(42.525423, 8, null, null, false); // 42.525423
formatNumber(2.5, 3, ",", "."); // 2,500
Working Live Demo at http://jsfiddle.net/roberkules/xCqqh/

Javascript adding zeros to the beginning of a string (max length 4 chars)

var number = 1310;
should be left alone.
var number = 120;
should be changed to "0120";
var number = 10;
should be changed to "0010";
var number = 7;
should be changed to "0007";

In all modern browsers you can use
numberStr.padStart(4, "0");
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/String/padStart
function zeroPad(num) {
return num.toString().padStart(4, "0");
}
var numbers = [1310, 120, 10, 7];
numbers.forEach(
function(num) {
var paddedNum = zeroPad(num);
console.log(paddedNum);
}
);

function pad_with_zeroes(number, length) {
var my_string = '' + number;
while (my_string.length < length) {
my_string = '0' + my_string;
}
return my_string;
}

try these:
('0000' + number).slice(-4);
or
(number+'').padStart(4,'0');

Here's another way. Comes from something I did that needs to be done thousands of times on a page load. It's pretty CPU efficient to hard code a string of zeroes one time, and chop as many as you need for the pad as many times as needed. I do really like the power of 10 method -- that's pretty flexible.
Anyway, this is as efficient as I could come up with:
For the original question, CHOOSE ONE of the cases...
var number = 1310;
var number = 120;
var number = 10;
var number = 7;
then
// only needs to happen once
var zeroString = "00000";
// one assignment gets the padded number
var paddedNum = zeroString.substring((number + "").length, 4) + bareNum;
//output
alert("The padded number string is: " + paddedNum);
Of course you still need to validate the input. Because this ONLY works reliably under the following conditions:
Number of zeroes in the zeroString is desired_length + 1
Number of digits in your starting number is less than or equal to your desired length
Backstory:
I have a case that needs a fixed length (14 digit) zero-padded number. I wanted to see how basic I could make this. It's run tens of thousands of times on a page load, so efficiency matters. It's not quite re-usable as-is, and it's a bit inelegant. Except that it is very very simple.
For desired n digits padded string, this method requires a string of (at least) n+1 zeroes. Index 0 is the first character in the string, which won't ever be used, so really, it could be anything.
Note also that string.substring() is different from string.substr()!
var bareNum = 42 + '';
var zeroString = "000000000000000";
var paddedNum = zeroString.substring(bareNumber.length, 14) + bareNum
This pulls zeroes from zeroString starting at the position matching the length of the string, and continues to get zeroes to the necessary length of 14. As long as that "14" in the third line is a lower integer than the number of characters in zeroString, it will work.

function pad(n, len) {
return (new Array(len + 1).join('0') + n).slice(-len);
}
might not work in old IE versions.

//to: 0 - to left, 1 - to right
String.prototype.pad = function(_char, len, to) {
if (!this || !_char || this.length >= len) {
return this;
}
to = to || 0;
var ret = this;
var max = (len - this.length)/_char.length + 1;
while (--max) {
ret = (to) ? ret + _char : _char + ret;
}
return ret;
};
Usage:
someString.pad(neededChars, neededLength)
Example:
'332'.pad('0', 6); //'000332'
'332'.pad('0', 6, 1); //'332000'

An approach I like is to add 10^N to the number, where N is the number of zeros you want. Treat the resultant number as a string and slice off the zeroth digit. Of course, you'll want to be careful if your input number might be larger than your pad length, but it's still much faster than the loop method:
// You want to pad four places:
>>> var N = Math.pow(10, 4)
>>> var number = 1310
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"1310"
>>> var number = 120
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"0120"
>>> var number = 10
>>> number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
"0010"
…
etc. You can make this into a function easily enough:
/**
* Pad a number with leading zeros to "pad" places:
*
* #param number: The number to pad
* #param pad: The maximum number of leading zeros
*/
function padNumber(number, pad) {
var N = Math.pow(10, pad);
return number < N ? ("" + (N + number)).slice(1) : "" + number
}

I wrote a general function for this. It takes an input control and pad length as input.
function padLeft(input, padLength) {
var num = $("#" + input).val();
$("#" + input).val(('0'.repeat(padLength) + num).slice(-padLength));
}

With RegExp/JavaScript:
var number = 7;
number = ('0000'+number).match(/\d{4}$/);
console.log(number);
With Function/RegExp/JavaScript:
var number = 7;
function padFix(n) {
return ('0000'+n).match(/\d{4}$/);
}
console.log(padFix(number));

No loop, no functions
let n = "" + 100;
let x = ("0000000000" + n).substring(n.length);//add your amount of zeros
alert(x + "-" + x.length);

Nate as the best way I found, it's just way too long to read. So I provide you with 3 simples solutions.
1. So here's my simplification of Nate's answer.
//number = 42
"0000".substring(number.toString().length, 4) + number;
2. Here's a solution that make it more reusable by using a function that takes the number and the desired length in parameters.
function pad_with_zeroes(number, len) {
var zeroes = "0".repeat(len);
return zeroes.substring(number.toString().length, len) + number;
}
// Usage: pad_with_zeroes(42,4);
// Returns "0042"
3. Here's a third solution, extending the Number prototype.
Number.prototype.toStringMinLen = function(len) {
var zeroes = "0".repeat(len);
return zeroes.substring(self.toString().length, len) + self;
}
//Usage: tmp=42; tmp.toStringMinLen(4)

Use String.JS librairy function padLeft:
S('123').padLeft(5, '0').s --> 00123

How to format a float in javascript?

In JavaScript, when converting from a float to a string, how can I get just 2 digits after the decimal point? For example, 0.34 instead of 0.3445434.

There are functions to round numbers. For example:
var x = 5.0364342423;
print(x.toFixed(2));
will print 5.04.
EDIT:
Fiddle

var result = Math.round(original*100)/100;
The specifics, in case the code isn't self-explanatory.
edit: ...or just use toFixed, as proposed by Tim Büthe. Forgot that one, thanks (and an upvote) for reminder :)

Be careful when using toFixed():
First, rounding the number is done using the binary representation of the number, which might lead to unexpected behaviour. For example
(0.595).toFixed(2) === '0.59'
instead of '0.6'.
Second, there's an IE bug with toFixed(). In IE (at least up to version 7, didn't check IE8), the following holds true:
(0.9).toFixed(0) === '0'
It might be a good idea to follow kkyy's suggestion or to use a custom toFixed() function, eg
function toFixed(value, precision) {
var power = Math.pow(10, precision || 0);
return String(Math.round(value * power) / power);
}

One more problem to be aware of, is that toFixed() can produce unnecessary zeros at the end of the number.
For example:
var x=(23-7.37)
x
15.629999999999999
x.toFixed(6)
"15.630000"
The idea is to clean up the output using a RegExp:
function humanize(x){
return x.toFixed(6).replace(/\.?0*$/,'');
}
The RegExp matches the trailing zeros (and optionally the decimal point) to make sure it looks good for integers as well.
humanize(23-7.37)
"15.63"
humanize(1200)
"1200"
humanize(1200.03)
"1200.03"
humanize(3/4)
"0.75"
humanize(4/3)
"1.333333"

var x = 0.3445434
x = Math.round (x*100) / 100 // this will make nice rounding

The key here I guess is to round up correctly first, then you can convert it to String.
function roundOf(n, p) {
const n1 = n * Math.pow(10, p + 1);
const n2 = Math.floor(n1 / 10);
if (n1 >= (n2 * 10 + 5)) {
return (n2 + 1) / Math.pow(10, p);
}
return n2 / Math.pow(10, p);
}
// All edge cases listed in this thread
roundOf(95.345, 2); // 95.35
roundOf(95.344, 2); // 95.34
roundOf(5.0364342423, 2); // 5.04
roundOf(0.595, 2); // 0.60
roundOf(0.335, 2); // 0.34
roundOf(0.345, 2); // 0.35
roundOf(551.175, 2); // 551.18
roundOf(0.3445434, 2); // 0.34
Now you can safely format this value with toFixed(p).
So with your specific case:
roundOf(0.3445434, 2).toFixed(2); // 0.34

There is a problem with all those solutions floating around using multipliers. Both kkyy and Christoph's solutions are wrong unfortunately.
Please test your code for number 551.175 with 2 decimal places - it will round to 551.17 while it should be 551.18 ! But if you test for ex. 451.175 it will be ok - 451.18. So it's difficult to spot this error at a first glance.
The problem is with multiplying: try 551.175 * 100 = 55117.49999999999 (ups!)
So my idea is to treat it with toFixed() before using Math.round();
function roundFix(number, precision)
{
var multi = Math.pow(10, precision);
return Math.round( (number * multi).toFixed(precision + 1) ) / multi;
}

If you want the string without round you can use this RegEx (maybe is not the most efficient way... but is really easy)
(2.34567778).toString().match(/\d+\.\d{2}/)[0]
// '2.34'

function trimNumber(num, len) {
const modulu_one = 1;
const start_numbers_float=2;
var int_part = Math.trunc(num);
var float_part = String(num % modulu_one);
float_part = float_part.slice(start_numbers_float, start_numbers_float+len);
return int_part+'.'+float_part;
}

There is no way to avoid inconsistent rounding for prices with x.xx5 as actual value using either multiplication or division. If you need to calculate correct prices client-side you should keep all amounts in cents. This is due to the nature of the internal representation of numeric values in JavaScript. Notice that Excel suffers from the same problems so most people wouldn't notice the small errors caused by this phenomen. However errors may accumulate whenever you add up a lot of calculated values, there is a whole theory around this involving the order of calculations and other methods to minimize the error in the final result. To emphasize on the problems with decimal values, please note that 0.1 + 0.2 is not exactly equal to 0.3 in JavaScript, while 1 + 2 is equal to 3.

Maybe you'll also want decimal separator? Here is a function I just made:
function formatFloat(num,casasDec,sepDecimal,sepMilhar) {
if (num < 0)
{
num = -num;
sinal = -1;
} else
sinal = 1;
var resposta = "";
var part = "";
if (num != Math.floor(num)) // decimal values present
{
part = Math.round((num-Math.floor(num))*Math.pow(10,casasDec)).toString(); // transforms decimal part into integer (rounded)
while (part.length < casasDec)
part = '0'+part;
if (casasDec > 0)
{
resposta = sepDecimal+part;
num = Math.floor(num);
} else
num = Math.round(num);
} // end of decimal part
while (num > 0) // integer part
{
part = (num - Math.floor(num/1000)*1000).toString(); // part = three less significant digits
num = Math.floor(num/1000);
if (num > 0)
while (part.length < 3) // 123.023.123 if sepMilhar = '.'
part = '0'+part; // 023
resposta = part+resposta;
if (num > 0)
resposta = sepMilhar+resposta;
}
if (sinal < 0)
resposta = '-'+resposta;
return resposta;
}

/** don't spend 5 minutes, use my code **/
function prettyFloat(x,nbDec) {
if (!nbDec) nbDec = 100;
var a = Math.abs(x);
var e = Math.floor(a);
var d = Math.round((a-e)*nbDec); if (d == nbDec) { d=0; e++; }
var signStr = (x<0) ? "-" : " ";
var decStr = d.toString(); var tmp = 10; while(tmp<nbDec && d*tmp < nbDec) {decStr = "0"+decStr; tmp*=10;}
var eStr = e.toString();
return signStr+eStr+"."+decStr;
}
prettyFloat(0); // "0.00"
prettyFloat(-1); // "-1.00"
prettyFloat(-0.999); // "-1.00"
prettyFloat(0.5); // "0.50"

I use this code to format floats. It is based on toPrecision() but it strips unnecessary zeros. I would welcome suggestions for how to simplify the regex.
function round(x, n) {
var exp = Math.pow(10, n);
return Math.floor(x*exp + 0.5)/exp;
}
Usage example:
function test(x, n, d) {
var rounded = rnd(x, d);
var result = rounded.toPrecision(n);
result = result.replace(/\.?0*$/, '');
result = result.replace(/\.?0*e/, 'e');
result = result.replace('e+', 'e');
return result;
}
document.write(test(1.2000e45, 3, 2) + '=' + '1.2e45' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.2000e+45, 3, 2) + '=' + '1.2e45' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.2340e45, 3, 2) + '=' + '1.23e45' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.2350e45, 3, 2) + '=' + '1.24e45' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.0000, 3, 2) + '=' + '1' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.0100, 3, 2) + '=' + '1.01' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.2340, 4, 2) + '=' + '1.23' + '<br>');
document.write(test(1.2350, 4, 2) + '=' + '1.24' + '<br>');

countDecimals = value => {
if (Math.floor(value) === value) return 0;
let stringValue = value.toString().split(".")[1];
if (stringValue) {
return value.toString().split(".")[1].length
? value.toString().split(".")[1].length
: 0;
} else {
return 0;
}
};
formatNumber=(ans)=>{
let decimalPlaces = this.countDecimals(ans);
ans = 1 * ans;
if (decimalPlaces !== 0) {
let onePlusAns = ans + 1;
let decimalOnePlus = this.countDecimals(onePlusAns);
if (decimalOnePlus < decimalPlaces) {
ans = ans.toFixed(decimalPlaces - 1).replace(/\.?0*$/, "");
} else {
let tenMulAns = ans * 10;
let decimalTenMul = this.countDecimals(tenMulAns);
if (decimalTenMul + 1 < decimalPlaces) {
ans = ans.toFixed(decimalPlaces - 1).replace(/\.?0*$/, "");
}
}
}
}
I just add 1 to the value and count the decimal digits present in the original value and the added value. If I find the decimal digits after adding one less than the original decimal digits, I just call the toFixed() with (original decimals - 1). I also check by multiplying the original value by 10 and follow the same logic in case adding one doesn't reduce redundant decimal places.
A simple workaround to handle floating-point number rounding in JS. Works in most cases I tried.