Related
I am trying to create a repetition of elements given array like this [1,2,10] to get the result by size n, if size n equals 2 the result is [ [1,1], [1,2], [1,10], [2,2], [2, 10], [10, 10] ]
i am trying to recursion it without any magic function javascript , just do push and pop :),
here is my code
function t(arr, length, i = 0, result = []) {
let final = []
if( result.length == length){
final.push(result)
console.log(final)
return
}
let j = i;
while( j < arr.length ) {
result.push(arr[j])
// console.log(result)
t(arr, length, j, result)
result.pop()
j++
}
return final
}
function k() {
const arr = [1,2,10]
const l = 2
return t(arr, l)
}
console.log( "finall result ===> " , k())
the final result is an empty array, though on condition above I push result to array empty of final,
is there any wrong in my code?
expected result : [ [1,1], [1,2], [1,10], [2,2], [2, 10], [10, 10] ]
You could take a recursive approach and iterate the array without mutating the array.
function getCombinations(array, n) {
function iter(index, right) {
if (right.length === n) {
result.push(right);
return;
}
while (index < array.length) {
iter(index, [...right, array[index]]);
index++;
}
}
var result = [];
iter(0, []);
return result;
}
console.log(getCombinations([1, 2, 10], 2));
I have some arrays like [1,5], [3,6], [2,8],[19,13], [12,15]. When i pass two arrays in the function output will be [1,6], [2,19],[12,15]
i want to remove overlapping numbers from 2 arrays . like on fist and second array 5 and 3 will be overlap between 1 to 6.
I believe this is what you want (you get the min of the first array and the max of the second array):
function removeOverlap(arr1, arr2) {
if (arr1 === undefined) {
return arr2;
}
if (arr2 === undefined) {
return arr1;
}
return [Math.min.apply(null, arr1), Math.max.apply(null, arr2)];
}
// Sample:
var myArrays = [[1,5], [3,6], [2,8], [19,13], [12,15]];
for (var i = 0; i < myArrays.length; i = i + 2) {
console.log(removeOverlap(myArrays[i], myArrays[i + 1]));
}
EDIT: answer with multiple parameters as you requested in your comment:
We could use rest parameters in the answer below, but I will use the arguments object for compatibility with Internet Explorer. If this is not a requirement you can adapt the solution to use the first.
function removeOverlap(arr1, arr2) {
// Converting the arguments object to array:
var argsArray = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
// Removing undefined:
argsArray = argsArray.filter(function(el) {
return el != undefined;
});
// Alternative (not compatible with Internet Explorer):
//argsArray = argsArray.filter(el => el);
// We're looking for the min and max numbers, let's merge the arrays
// e.g. transform [[1, 5], [3, 6], [2, 8]] into [1, 5, 3, 6, 2, 8]
var merged = [].concat.apply([], argsArray);
// Alternative, but it is not compatible with Internet Explorer:
//var merged = Array.flat(argsArray);
return [Math.min.apply(null, merged), Math.max.apply(null, merged)];
}
// Sample:
var myArrays = [[1,5], [3,6], [2,8], [19,13], [12,15]];
for (var i = 0; i < myArrays.length; i = i + 2) {
console.log(removeOverlap(myArrays[i], myArrays[i + 1]));
}
console.log(removeOverlap(myArrays[0], myArrays[1], myArrays[2]));
This can easily be accomplished my finding the min of the current and max of the next item.
let initial = [ [1, 5], [3, 6], [2, 8], [19, 13], [12, 15] ]
let expected = [ [1, 6], [2, 19], [12, 15] ]
let actual = calculateOverlaps(initial);
console.log(JSON.stringify(actual) === JSON.stringify(expected)); // true
function calculateOverlaps(arr) {
let result = [];
for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i+=2) {
if (i >= arr.length - 1) {
result.push(arr[i]); // If the array has an odd size, get last item
} else {
let curr = arr[i];
let next = arr[i + 1];
result.push([ Math.min(...curr), Math.max(...next) ]);
}
}
return result;
}
Here is a more code-golf oriented function:
const calculateOverlaps1 = (arr) => arr.reduce((r, e, i, a) =>
(i % 2 === 0)
? r.concat([
(i < a.length - 1)
? [ Math.min(...e), Math.max(...a[i+1]) ]
: e
])
: r, []);
And even smaller, at just 101 bytes.
f=a=>a.reduce((r,e,i)=>i%2===0?r.concat([i<a.length-1?[Math.min(...e),Math.max(...a[i+1])]:e]):r,[]);
i want to match an array with another array if the content in array is same with another array and how many is match, for example:
array2 = [1,2,3];
array1 = [1,3];
console.log(findMatch(array1,array2));
//result["total_match"] = 2
//result["not_match"] = [2]
array2 = [4,5,6];
array1 = [6,4,5];
console.log(findMatch(array1,array2));
//result["total_match"] = 3
//result["not_match"] = []
array2 = [1,4,7];
array1 = [4,2,3,8,5];
console.log(findMatch(array1,array2));
//result["total_match"] = 1
//result["not_match"] = [1,7]
function findMatch(array1,array2){ // fill
var result = [];
result["total_match"] = 0;
result["not_match"] = [];
//????
return result;
}
basically the array2 is an array with 3-index that i want to match with another dynamic array1, i want to get the result of the total match, and the value that not match in an array
This is answered here, using Array.prototype.filter
https://medium.com/#alvaro.saburido/set-theory-for-arrays-in-es6-eb2f20a61848
The example given:
let intersection = arrA.filter(x => arrB.includes(x));
You could use a Array.reduce inside your function and then Array.filter + Array.includes:
const findMatch = (a,b) => a.reduce((acc,c) => {
acc.total_match = a.filter(x => b.includes(x)).length
acc.not_match = a.filter(x => !b.includes(x))
return acc
}, {total_match: 0})
console.log(findMatch([1,2,3], [1,3]))
console.log(findMatch([4,5,6], [6,4,5]))
console.log(findMatch([1,4,7], [4,2,3,8,5]))
Another option is to use Array.forEach + Array.includes and in this way skip the 2nd filter:
const findMatch = (a,b) => {
let result = { total_match: 0, not_match: [] }
a.forEach(x => !b.includes(x) ? result.not_match.push(x) : result.total_match++)
return result
}
console.log(findMatch([1,2,3], [1,3]))
console.log(findMatch([4,5,6], [6,4,5]))
console.log(findMatch([1,4,7], [4,2,3,8,5]))
try this,
array1 = [1,4,7];
array2 = [4,2,3,8,5];
console.log(findMatch(array1,array2));
function findMatch(a1,a2){
var result = {}
var total_match = 0
for (var i = 0; i< a2.length ;i++){
if(a1.indexOf(a2[i]) != -1){
total_match +=1
removeA(a1,a2[i])
}
}
result["total_match"] =total_match;
result["not_match"] = a1;
return result;
}
function removeA(arr) {
var what, a = arguments, L = a.length, ax;
while (L > 1 && arr.length) {
what = a[--L];
while ((ax= arr.indexOf(what)) !== -1) {
arr.splice(ax, 1);
}
}
return arr;
}
I've been waiting for answers to my questions about the criteria of "not_match", but it seems you've just provided wrong expected results. The exact code would be this (credits to Paul Thomas):
const notMatch = array2.filter(x => !array1.includes(x));
result["total_match"] = array2.length - notMatch.length;
result["not_match"] = notMatch;
Here is the code,
let difference = arrA
.filter(x => !arrB.includes(x))
.concat(arrB.filter(x => !arrA.includes(x))); // shows code that doesn't match
let difference = arrA.filter(x => !arrB.includes(x)); //shows code that matches
Guys I'm pretty sure in JavaScript you can just do a == comparison on the arrays.
const areArraysEqual = arr1 == arr2;
Merge the arrays with concat()
filter() the merged array with this criteria using indexOf():
mergedArray.indexOf(element) !== index;
This will return an array of matched elements.
Next filter() the merged array with this criteria using indexOf():
matchedArray.indexOf(element) === -1;
This will return an array of unique elements.
function arrayFilter(array1, array2) {
var merged = array1.concat(array2);
var matched = merged.filter(function(ele, idx, arr) {
return arr.indexOf(ele) !== idx;
});
var uniques = merged.filter(function(ele) {
return matched.indexOf(ele) === -1;
});
return `
Matched: ${matched} -- Qty: ${matched.length}
Uniques: ${uniques} -- Qty: ${uniques.length}`;
}
console.log(arrayFilter([1, 4, 7], [4, 2, 3, 8, 1]));
console.log(arrayFilter([33, 205, 7, 88, 1, 56], [4, 205, 3, 88, 1, 0]));
console.log(arrayFilter([3, 5, 17, 16, 101, 8], [8, 25, 3, 8, 99, 101]));
console.log(arrayFilter([0, 55, 8], [55, 0, 8]));
console.log(arrayFilter([111, 59, 4], [577, 97]));
I'm not sure if the title of this question is correct or not and also not sure what the appropriate keyword to search on google.
I have an array look like:
var myArray = [1,1,2,2,2,3,4,4,4];
and I want to sort my array into:
var myArray = [1,2,3,4,1,2,4,2,4];
Please in to my expected result. the order is ascending but duplicate value will repeated on last sequence instead of put it together in adjacent keys. So the expected result grouped as 1,2,3,4 1,2,4 and 2,4.
Thank you for your help and sorry for my bad English.
This code works. But it may exist a better solution.
// We assume myArray is already sorted
var myArray = [1,1,2,2,2,3,4,4,4],
result = [];
while (myArray.length) {
var value = myArray.shift();
// Find place
var index = 0;
while(result[index] && result[index][result[index].length - 1] == value) index++;
if(!result[index]) {
result[index] = [];
}
result[index][result[index].length] = value;
}
result.reduce(function(current, sum) {
return current.concat(sum);
});
console.log(result) // Display [1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 4, 2, 4]
Here is my method using JQuery and it does not assume the array is already sorted.
It will iterate through the array and no duplicates to tempResultArray, once finished, it will then add them to the existing result and repeat the process again to find duplicates.
This is not the most efficient method, but it can be handled by one function and does not require the array to be sorted.
var myArray = [1,1,2,2,2,3,4,4,4],result = [];
while (myArray && myArray.length) {
myArray = customSort(myArray);
}
console.log(result);
function customSort(myArray){
var tempResultArray = [], tempMyArray = [];
$.each(myArray, function(i, el){
if($.inArray(el, tempResultArray ) === -1){
tempResultArray.push(el);
}else{
tempMyArray.push(el);
}
});
tempResultArray.sort(function(a, b){return a-b});
$.merge( result,tempResultArray)
return tempMyArray;
}
JSFiddle
This proposal features a straight forward approach with focus on array methods.
function sprout(array) {
return array.reduce(function (r, a) {
!r.some(function (b) {
if (b[b.length - 1] < a) {
b.push(a);
return true;
}
}) && r.push([a]);
return r;
}, []).reduce(function (r, a) {
return r.concat(a);
});
}
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(sprout([1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4]), 0, 4) + '</pre>');
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(sprout([1, 2, 3, 7, 7, 7]), 0, 4) + '</pre>');
document.write('<pre>' + JSON.stringify(sprout([1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 7]), 0, 4) + '</pre>');
here's another solution:
var myArray = [1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4];
function mySequelArray(arr) {
var res = arguments[1] || [];
var nextVal;
var min = Math.min.apply(null, arr);
if (res.length > 0) {
nextVal = arr.filter(function (x) {
return x > res[res.length - 1]
}).sort()[0] || min;
} else {
nextVal = min;
}
res.push(nextVal);
arr.splice(arr.indexOf(nextVal), 1);
return (arr.length > 0) ? mySequelArray(arr, res) : res;
}
console.log(mySequelArray(myArray))
fiddle
My best approach will be to split your array into separate arrays for each repeated value, then arrange each separate array and join altogether.
UPDATED:
I wrote a quick code sample that should work if the same number in inputArray is not given more than twice. You could improve it by making it recursive thus creating new arrays for each new number and removing the limitation. Had some free time so i re-wrote a recursive function to sort any given array in sequence groups like you wanted. Works like a charm, inputArray does not need to be sorted and doesn't require any libraries. Jsfiddle here.
var inputArray = [3, 4, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 5, 1];
var result = sortInSequence(inputArray);
console.log(result); //output: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 1]
function sortInSequence(inputArray){
var inputArraySize = inputArray.length,
tempArray = [], //holds new array we are populating
sameValuesArray = [], //holds same values that we will pass as param in recursive call
rSorted = []; //init sorted array in case we have no same values
for(var i = inputArraySize; i > 0; i--){
var value = inputArray.pop();
tempArray.push(value);
var counter = 0,
tempArraySize = tempArray.length;
for(var j = 0; j < tempArraySize; j++){
if(tempArray[j] == value){
counter++;
}
}
if(counter == 2){
//value found twice, so remove it from tempArray and add it in sameValuesArray
var sameValue = tempArray.pop();
sameValuesArray.push(sameValue);
}
}
if(sameValuesArray.length > 0){
rSorted = sortInSequence(sameValuesArray);
}
tempArray.sort();
return tempArray.concat(rSorted);
}
I am trying to figure out a solution for symmetric
difference using javascript that accomplishes the following
objectives:
accepts an unspecified number of arrays as arguments
preserves the original order of the numbers in the arrays
does not remove duplicates of numbers in single arrays
removes duplicates occurring across arrays
Thus, for example,
if the input is ([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4]),
the solution would be, [1, 1, 6, 5, 4].
I am trying to solve this as challenge given by an online
coding community. The exact instructions of the challenge
state,
Create a function that takes two or more arrays and returns an array
of the symmetric difference of the provided arrays.
The mathematical term symmetric difference refers to the elements in
two sets that are in either the first or second set, but not in both.
Although my solution below finds the numbers that are
unique to each array, it eliminates all numbers occuring
more than once and does not keep the order of the numbers.
My question is very close to the one asked at finding symmetric difference/unique elements in multiple arrays in javascript. However, the solution
does not preserve the original order of the numbers and does not preserve duplicates of unique numbers occurring in single arrays.
function sym(args){
var arr = [];
var result = [];
var units;
var index = {};
for(var i in arguments){
units = arguments[i];
for(var j = 0; j < units.length; j++){
arr.push(units[j]);
}
}
arr.forEach(function(a){
if(!index[a]){
index[a] = 0;
}
index[a]++;
});
for(var l in index){
if(index[l] === 1){
result.push(+l);
}
}
return result;
}
symsym([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4]); // => Desired answer: [1, 1, 6. 5. 4]
As with all problems, it's best to start off writing an algorithm:
Concatenate versions of the arrays, where each array is filtered to contain those elements which no array other than the current one contains
Then just write that down in JS:
function sym() {
var arrays = [].slice.apply(arguments);
return [].concat.apply([], // concatenate
arrays.map( // versions of the arrays
function(array, i) { // where each array
return array.filter( // is filtered to contain
function(elt) { // those elements which
return !arrays.some( // no array
function(a, j) { //
return i !== j // other than the current one
&& a.indexOf(elt) >= 0 // contains
;
}
);
}
);
}
)
);
}
Non-commented version, written more succinctly using ES6:
function sym(...arrays) {
return [].concat(arrays .
map((array, i) => array .
filter(elt => !arrays .
some((a, j) => i !== j && a.indexOf(elt) >= 0))));
}
Here's a version that uses the Set object to make for faster lookup. Here's the basic logic:
It puts each array passed as an argument into a separate Set object (to faciliate fast lookup).
Then, it iterates each passed in array and compares it to the other Set objects (the ones not made from the array being iterated).
If the item is not found in any of the other Sets, then it is added to the result.
So, it starts with the first array [1, 1, 2, 6]. Since 1 is not found in either of the other arrays, each of the first two 1 values are added to the result. Then 2 is found in the second set so it is not added to the result. Then 6 is not found in either of the other two sets so it is added to the result. The same process repeats for the second array [2, 3, 5] where 2 and 3 are found in other Sets, but 5 is not so 5 is added to the result. And, for the last array, only 4 is not found in the other Sets. So, the final result is [1,1,6,5,4].
The Set objects are used for convenience and performance. One could use .indexOf() to look them up in each array or one could make your own Set-like lookup with a plain object if you didn't want to rely on the Set object. There's also a partial polyfill for the Set object that would work here in this answer.
function symDiff() {
var sets = [], result = [];
// make copy of arguments into an array
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0);
// put each array into a set for easy lookup
args.forEach(function(arr) {
sets.push(new Set(arr));
});
// now see which elements in each array are unique
// e.g. not contained in the other sets
args.forEach(function(array, arrayIndex) {
// iterate each item in the array
array.forEach(function(item) {
var found = false;
// iterate each set (use a plain for loop so it's easier to break)
for (var setIndex = 0; setIndex < sets.length; setIndex++) {
// skip the set from our own array
if (setIndex !== arrayIndex) {
if (sets[setIndex].has(item)) {
// if the set has this item
found = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!found) {
result.push(item);
}
});
});
return result;
}
var r = symDiff([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4]);
log(r);
function log(x) {
var d = document.createElement("div");
d.textContent = JSON.stringify(x);
document.body.appendChild(d);
}
One key part of this code is how it compares a given item to the Sets from the other arrays. It just iterates through the list of Set objects, but it skips the Set object that has the same index in the array as the array being iterated. That skips the Set made from this array so it's only looking for items that exist in other arrays. That allows it to retain duplicates that occur in only one array.
Here's a version that uses the Set object if it's present, but inserts a teeny replacement if not (so this will work in more older browsers):
function symDiff() {
var sets = [], result = [], LocalSet;
if (typeof Set === "function") {
try {
// test to see if constructor supports iterable arg
var temp = new Set([1,2,3]);
if (temp.size === 3) {
LocalSet = Set;
}
} catch(e) {}
}
if (!LocalSet) {
// use teeny polyfill for Set
LocalSet = function(arr) {
this.has = function(item) {
return arr.indexOf(item) !== -1;
}
}
}
// make copy of arguments into an array
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0);
// put each array into a set for easy lookup
args.forEach(function(arr) {
sets.push(new LocalSet(arr));
});
// now see which elements in each array are unique
// e.g. not contained in the other sets
args.forEach(function(array, arrayIndex) {
// iterate each item in the array
array.forEach(function(item) {
var found = false;
// iterate each set (use a plain for loop so it's easier to break)
for (var setIndex = 0; setIndex < sets.length; setIndex++) {
// skip the set from our own array
if (setIndex !== arrayIndex) {
if (sets[setIndex].has(item)) {
// if the set has this item
found = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!found) {
result.push(item);
}
});
});
return result;
}
var r = symDiff([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4]);
log(r);
function log(x) {
var d = document.createElement("div");
d.textContent = JSON.stringify(x);
document.body.appendChild(d);
}
I came across this question in my research of the same coding challenge on FCC. I was able to solve it using for and while loops, but had some trouble solving using the recommended Array.reduce(). After learning a ton about .reduce and other array methods, I thought I'd share my solutions as well.
This is the first way I solved it, without using .reduce.
function sym() {
var arrays = [].slice.call(arguments);
function diff(arr1, arr2) {
var arr = [];
arr1.forEach(function(v) {
if ( !~arr2.indexOf(v) && !~arr.indexOf(v) ) {
arr.push( v );
}
});
arr2.forEach(function(v) {
if ( !~arr1.indexOf(v) && !~arr.indexOf(v) ) {
arr.push( v );
}
});
return arr;
}
var result = diff(arrays.shift(), arrays.shift());
while (arrays.length > 0) {
result = diff(result, arrays.shift());
}
return result;
}
After learning and trying various method combinations, I came up with this that I think is pretty succinct and readable.
function sym() {
var arrays = [].slice.call(arguments);
function diff(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.filter(function (v) {
return !~arr2.indexOf(v);
});
}
return arrays.reduce(function (accArr, curArr) {
return [].concat( diff(accArr, curArr), diff(curArr, accArr) )
.filter(function (v, i, self) { return self.indexOf(v) === i; });
});
}
That last .filter line I thought was pretty cool to dedup an array. I found it here, but modified it to use the 3rd callback parameter instead of the named array due to the method chaining.
This challenge was a lot of fun!
// Set difference, a.k.a. relative compliment
const diff = (a, b) => a.filter(v => !b.includes(v))
const symDiff = (first, ...rest) =>
rest.reduce(
(acc, x) => [
...diff(acc, x),
...diff(x, acc),
],
first,
)
/* - - - */
console.log(symDiff([1, 3], ['Saluton', 3])) // [1, 'Saluton']
console.log(symDiff([1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 8, 5])) // [1, 8, 5]
Just use _.xor or copy lodash code.
Another simple, yet readable solution:
/*
This filters arr1 and arr2 from elements which are in both arrays
and returns concatenated results from filtering.
*/
function symDiffArray(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.filter(elem => !arr2.includes(elem))
.concat(arr2.filter(elem => !arr1.includes(elem)));
}
/*
Add and use this if you want to filter more than two arrays at a time.
*/
function symDiffArrays(...arrays) {
return arrays.reduce(symDiffArray, []);
}
console.log(symDiffArray([1, 3], ['Saluton', 3])); // [1, 'Saluton']
console.log(symDiffArrays([1, 3], [2, 3], [2, 8, 5])); // [1, 8, 5]
Used functions: Array.prototype.filter() | Array.prototype.reduce() | Array.prototype.includes()
function sym(arr1, arr2, ...rest) {
//creating a array which has unique numbers from both the arrays
const union = [...new Set([...arr1,...arr2])];
// finding the Symmetric Difference between those two arrays
const diff = union.filter((num)=> !(arr1.includes(num) && arr2.includes(num)))
//if there are more than 2 arrays
if(rest.length){
// recurrsively call till rest become 0
// i.e. diff of 1,2 will be the first parameter so every recurrsive call will reduce // the arrays till diff between all of them are calculated.
return sym(diff, rest[0], ...rest.slice(1))
}
return diff
}
Create a Map with a count of all unique values (across arrays). Then concat all arrays, and filter non unique values using the Map.
const symsym = (...args) => {
// create a Map from the unique value of each array
const m = args.reduce((r, a) => {
// get unique values of array, and add to Map
new Set(a).forEach((n) => r.set(n, (r.get(n) || 0) + 1));
return r;
}, new Map());
// combine all arrays
return [].concat(...args)
// remove all items that appear more than once in the map
.filter((n) => m.get(n) === 1);
};
console.log(symsym([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4])); // => Desired answer: [1, 1, 6, 5, 4]
This is the JS code using higher order functions
function sym(args) {
var output;
output = [].slice.apply(arguments).reduce(function(previous, current) {
current.filter(function(value, index, self) { //for unique
return self.indexOf(value) === index;
}).map(function(element) { //pushing array
var loc = previous.indexOf(element);
a = [loc !== -1 ? previous.splice(loc, 1) : previous.push(element)];
});
return previous;
}, []);
document.write(output);
return output;
}
sym([1, 2, 3], [5, 2, 1, 4]);
And it would return the output as: [3,5,4]
Pure javascript solution.
function diff(arr1, arr2) {
var arr3= [];
for(var i = 0; i < arr1.length; i++ ){
var unique = true;
for(var j=0; j < arr2.length; j++){
if(arr1[i] == arr2[j]){
unique = false;
break;
}
}
if(unique){
arr3.push(arr1[i]);}
}
return arr3;
}
function symDiff(arr1, arr2){
return diff(arr1,arr2).concat(diff(arr2,arr1));
}
symDiff([1, "calf", 3, "piglet"], [7, "filly"])
//[1, "calf", 3, "piglet", 7, "filly"]
My short solution. At the end, I removed duplicates by filter().
function sym() {
var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var almost = args.reduce(function(a,b){
return b.filter(function(i) {return a.indexOf(i) < 0;})
.concat(a.filter(function(i){return b.indexOf(i)<0;}));
});
return almost.filter(function(el, pos){return almost.indexOf(el) == pos;});
}
sym([1, 1, 2, 5], [2, 2, 3, 5], [3, 4, 5, 5]);
//Result: [4,5,1]
function sym(args) {
var initialArray = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
var combinedTotalArray = initialArray.reduce(symDiff);
// Iterate each element in array, find values not present in other array and push values in combinedDualArray if value is not there already
// Repeat for the other array (change roles)
function symDiff(arrayOne, arrayTwo){
var combinedDualArray = [];
arrayOne.forEach(function(el, i){
if(!arrayTwo.includes(el) && !combinedDualArray.includes(el)){
combinedDualArray.push(el);
}
});
arrayTwo.forEach(function(el, i){
if(!arrayOne.includes(el) && !combinedDualArray.includes(el)){
combinedDualArray.push(el);
}
});
combinedDualArray.sort();
return combinedDualArray;
}
return combinedTotalArray;
}
console.log(sym([1, 1, 2, 5], [2, 2, 3, 5], [3, 4, 5, 5]));
This function removes duplicates because the original concept of symmetric difference operates over sets. In this example, the function operates on the sets this way: ((A △ B) △ C) △ D ...
function sym(...args) {
return args.reduce((old, cur) => {
let oldSet = [...new Set(old)]
let curSet = [...new Set(cur)]
return [
...oldSet.filter(i => !curSet.includes(i)),
...curSet.filter(i => !oldSet.includes(i))
]
})
}
// Running> sym([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4])
console.log(sym([1, 1, 2, 6], [2, 3, 5], [2, 3, 4]))
// Return> [1, 6, 5, 2, 4]
This works for me:
function sym() {
var args = [].slice.call(arguments);
var getSym = function(arr1, arr2) {
return arr1.filter(function(each, idx) {
return arr2.indexOf(each) === -1 && arr1.indexOf(each, idx + 1) === -1;
}).concat(arr2.filter(function(each, idx) {
return arr1.indexOf(each) === -1 && arr2.indexOf(each, idx + 1) === -1;
}));
};
var result = getSym(args[0], args[1]);
var len = args.length - 1, i = 2;
while (--len) {
result = [].concat(getSym(result, args[i]));
i++;
}
return result;
}
console.info(sym([1, 1, 2, 5], [2, 2, 3, 5], [6, 8], [7, 8], [9]));
Alternative: Use the lookup inside a map instead of an array
function sym(...vs){
var has = {};
//flatten values
vs.reduce((a,b)=>a.concat(b)).
//if element does not exist add it (value==1)
//or mark it as multiply found value > 1
forEach(value=>{has[value] = (has[value]||0)+1});
return Object.keys(has).filter(x=>has[x]==1).map(x=>parseInt(x,10));
}
console.log(sym([1, 2, 3], [5, 2, 1, 4],[5,7], [5]));//[3,4,7])
Hey if anyone is interested this is my solution:
function sym (...args) {
let fileteredArgs = [];
let symDiff = [];
args.map(arrayEl =>
fileteredArgs.push(arrayEl.filter((el, key) =>
arrayEl.indexOf(el) === key
)
)
);
fileteredArgs.map(elArr => {
elArr.map(el => {
let index = symDiff.indexOf(el);
if (index === -1) {
symDiff.push(el);
} else {
symDiff.splice(index, 1);
}
});
});
return (symDiff);
}
console.log(sym([1, 2, 3, 3], [5, 2, 1, 4]));
Here is the solution
let a=[1, 1, 2, 6]
let b=[2, 3, 5];
let c= [2, 3, 4]
let result=[...a,...b].filter(item=>!(a.includes(item) && b.includes(item) ))
result=[...result,...c].filter(item=>!(b.includes(item) && c.includes(item) ))
console.log(result) //[1, 1, 6, 5, 4]
Concise solution using
Arrow functions
Array spread syntax
Array filter
Array reduce
Set
Rest parameters
Implicit return
const symPair = (a, b) =>
[...a.filter(item => !b.includes(item)),
...b.filter(item => !a.includes(item))]
const sym = (...args) => [...new Set(args.reduce(symPair))]
The function symPair works for two input arrays, and the function sym works for two or more arrays, using symPair as a reducer.
const symPair = (a, b) =>
[...a.filter(item => !b.includes(item)),
...b.filter(item => !a.includes(item))]
const sym = (...args) => [...new Set(args.reduce(symPair))]
console.log(sym([1, 2, 3], [2, 3, 4], [6]))
const removeDuplicates = (data) => Array.from(new Set(data));
const getSymmetric = (data) => (val) => data.indexOf(val) === data.lastIndexOf(val)
function sym(...args) {
let joined = [];
args.forEach((arr) => {
joined = joined.concat(removeDuplicates(arr));
joined = joined.filter(getSymmetric(joined))
});
return joined;
}
console.log(sym([1, 2, 3], [5, 2, 1, 4]));
Below code worked fine all the scenarios. Try the below code
function sym() {
var result = [];
for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) {
if (i == 0) {
var setA = arguments[i].filter((val) => !arguments[i + 1].includes(val));
var setB = arguments[i + 1].filter((val) => !arguments[i].includes(val));
result = [...setA, ...setB];
i = i + 1;
} else {
var setA = arguments[i].filter((val) => !result.includes(val));
var setB = result.filter((val) => !arguments[i].includes(val));
result = [...setA, ...setB];
}
}
return result.filter((c, index) => {
return result.indexOf(c) === index;
}).sort();
}
My code passed all test cases for the similar question on freecodecamp. Below is code for the same.
function sym(...args) {
const result = args.reduce((acc, curr, i) => {
if (curr.length > acc.length) {
const arr = curr.reduce((a, c, i) => {
if(a.includes(c)){
}
if (!acc.includes(c) && !a.includes(c)) {
a.push(c);
}
if (!curr.includes(acc[i]) && i < acc.length) {
a.push(acc[i])
}
return a;
}, []);
return [...arr];
} else {
const arr = acc.reduce((a, c, i) => {
if(a.includes(c)){
}
if (!curr.includes(c) && !a.includes(c)) {
a.push(c);
}
if (!acc.includes(curr[i]) && i < curr.length) {
a.push(curr[i])
}
return a;
}, []);
return [...arr]
}
});
let ans = new Set([...result])
return [...ans]
}
sym([1,2,3,3],[5, 2, 1, 4,5]);