Related
I need to create a simple but accurate timer.
This is my code:
var seconds = 0;
setInterval(function() {
timer.innerHTML = seconds++;
}, 1000);
After exactly 3600 seconds, it prints about 3500 seconds.
Why is it not accurate?
How can I create an accurate timer?
Why is it not accurate?
Because you are using setTimeout() or setInterval(). They cannot be trusted, there are no accuracy guarantees for them. They are allowed to lag arbitrarily, and they do not keep a constant pace but tend to drift (as you have observed).
How can I create an accurate timer?
Use the Date object instead to get the (millisecond-)accurate, current time. Then base your logic on the current time value, instead of counting how often your callback has been executed.
For a simple timer or clock, keep track of the time difference explicitly:
var start = Date.now();
setInterval(function() {
var delta = Date.now() - start; // milliseconds elapsed since start
…
output(Math.floor(delta / 1000)); // in seconds
// alternatively just show wall clock time:
output(new Date().toUTCString());
}, 1000); // update about every second
Now, that has the problem of possibly jumping values. When the interval lags a bit and executes your callback after 990, 1993, 2996, 3999, 5002 milliseconds, you will see the second count 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 (!). So it would be advisable to update more often, like about every 100ms, to avoid such jumps.
However, sometimes you really need a steady interval executing your callbacks without drifting. This requires a bit more advanced strategy (and code), though it pays out well (and registers less timeouts). Those are known as self-adjusting timers. Here the exact delay for each of the repeated timeouts is adapted to the actually elapsed time, compared to the expected intervals:
var interval = 1000; // ms
var expected = Date.now() + interval;
setTimeout(step, interval);
function step() {
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // the drift (positive for overshooting)
if (dt > interval) {
// something really bad happened. Maybe the browser (tab) was inactive?
// possibly special handling to avoid futile "catch up" run
}
… // do what is to be done
expected += interval;
setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt)); // take into account drift
}
I'ma just build on Bergi's answer (specifically the second part) a little bit because I really liked the way it was done, but I want the option to stop the timer once it starts (like clearInterval() almost). Sooo... I've wrapped it up into a constructor function so we can do 'objecty' things with it.
1. Constructor
Alright, so you copy/paste that...
/**
* Self-adjusting interval to account for drifting
*
* #param {function} workFunc Callback containing the work to be done
* for each interval
* #param {int} interval Interval speed (in milliseconds)
* #param {function} errorFunc (Optional) Callback to run if the drift
* exceeds interval
*/
function AdjustingInterval(workFunc, interval, errorFunc) {
var that = this;
var expected, timeout;
this.interval = interval;
this.start = function() {
expected = Date.now() + this.interval;
timeout = setTimeout(step, this.interval);
}
this.stop = function() {
clearTimeout(timeout);
}
function step() {
var drift = Date.now() - expected;
if (drift > that.interval) {
// You could have some default stuff here too...
if (errorFunc) errorFunc();
}
workFunc();
expected += that.interval;
timeout = setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, that.interval-drift));
}
}
2. Instantiate
Tell it what to do and all that...
// For testing purposes, we'll just increment
// this and send it out to the console.
var justSomeNumber = 0;
// Define the work to be done
var doWork = function() {
console.log(++justSomeNumber);
};
// Define what to do if something goes wrong
var doError = function() {
console.warn('The drift exceeded the interval.');
};
// (The third argument is optional)
var ticker = new AdjustingInterval(doWork, 1000, doError);
3. Then do... stuff
// You can start or stop your timer at will
ticker.start();
ticker.stop();
// You can also change the interval while it's in progress
ticker.interval = 99;
I mean, it works for me anyway. If there's a better way, lemme know.
Bergi's answer pinpoints exactly why the timer from the question is not accurate. Here's my take on a simple JS timer with start, stop, reset and getTime methods:
class Timer {
constructor () {
this.isRunning = false;
this.startTime = 0;
this.overallTime = 0;
}
_getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart () {
if (!this.startTime) {
return 0;
}
return Date.now() - this.startTime;
}
start () {
if (this.isRunning) {
return console.error('Timer is already running');
}
this.isRunning = true;
this.startTime = Date.now();
}
stop () {
if (!this.isRunning) {
return console.error('Timer is already stopped');
}
this.isRunning = false;
this.overallTime = this.overallTime + this._getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart();
}
reset () {
this.overallTime = 0;
if (this.isRunning) {
this.startTime = Date.now();
return;
}
this.startTime = 0;
}
getTime () {
if (!this.startTime) {
return 0;
}
if (this.isRunning) {
return this.overallTime + this._getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart();
}
return this.overallTime;
}
}
const timer = new Timer();
timer.start();
setInterval(() => {
const timeInSeconds = Math.round(timer.getTime() / 1000);
document.getElementById('time').innerText = timeInSeconds;
}, 100)
<p>Elapsed time: <span id="time">0</span>s</p>
The snippet also includes a solution for your problem. So instead of incrementing seconds variable every 1000ms interval, we just start the timer and then every 100ms* we just read elapsed time from the timer and update the view accordingly.
* - makes it more accurate than 1000ms
To make your timer more accurate, you would have to round
Most of the timers in the answers here will linger behind the expected time because they set the "expected" value to the ideal and only account for the delay that the browser introduced before that point. This is fine if you just need accurate intervals, but if you are timing relative to other events then you will (nearly) always have this delay.
To correct it, you can keep track of the drift history and use it to predict future drift. By adding a secondary adjustment with this preemptive correction, the variance in the drift centers around the target time. For example, if you're always getting a drift of 20 to 40ms, this adjustment would shift it to -10 to +10ms around the target time.
Building on Bergi's answer, I've used a rolling median for my prediction algorithm. Taking just 10 samples with this method makes a reasonable difference.
var interval = 200; // ms
var expected = Date.now() + interval;
var drift_history = [];
var drift_history_samples = 10;
var drift_correction = 0;
function calc_drift(arr){
// Calculate drift correction.
/*
In this example I've used a simple median.
You can use other methods, but it's important not to use an average.
If the user switches tabs and back, an average would put far too much
weight on the outlier.
*/
var values = arr.concat(); // copy array so it isn't mutated
values.sort(function(a,b){
return a-b;
});
if(values.length ===0) return 0;
var half = Math.floor(values.length / 2);
if (values.length % 2) return values[half];
var median = (values[half - 1] + values[half]) / 2.0;
return median;
}
setTimeout(step, interval);
function step() {
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // the drift (positive for overshooting)
if (dt > interval) {
// something really bad happened. Maybe the browser (tab) was inactive?
// possibly special handling to avoid futile "catch up" run
}
// do what is to be done
// don't update the history for exceptionally large values
if (dt <= interval) {
// sample drift amount to history after removing current correction
// (add to remove because the correction is applied by subtraction)
drift_history.push(dt + drift_correction);
// predict new drift correction
drift_correction = calc_drift(drift_history);
// cap and refresh samples
if (drift_history.length >= drift_history_samples) {
drift_history.shift();
}
}
expected += interval;
// take into account drift with prediction
setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt - drift_correction));
}
I agree with Bergi on using Date, but his solution was a bit of overkill for my use. I simply wanted my animated clock (digital and analog SVGs) to update on the second and not overrun or under run creating obvious jumps in the clock updates. Here is the snippet of code I put in my clock update functions:
var milliseconds = now.getMilliseconds();
var newTimeout = 1000 - milliseconds;
this.timeoutVariable = setTimeout((function(thisObj) { return function() { thisObj.update(); } })(this), newTimeout);
It simply calculates the delta time to the next even second, and sets the timeout to that delta. This syncs all of my clock objects to the second. Hope this is helpful.
Here's a solution that pauses when the window is hidden, and can be cancelled with an abort controller.
function animationInterval(ms, signal, callback) {
const start = document.timeline.currentTime;
function frame(time) {
if (signal.aborted) return;
callback(time);
scheduleFrame(time);
}
function scheduleFrame(time) {
const elapsed = time - start;
const roundedElapsed = Math.round(elapsed / ms) * ms;
const targetNext = start + roundedElapsed + ms;
const delay = targetNext - performance.now();
setTimeout(() => requestAnimationFrame(frame), delay);
}
scheduleFrame(start);
}
Usage:
const controller = new AbortController();
// Create an animation callback every second:
animationInterval(1000, controller.signal, time => {
console.log('tick!', time);
});
// And stop it sometime later:
controller.abort();
Modern, Fully Programmable Timer
This timer takes a frequency in Hertz, and a callback that can take up to four arguments, the current frame index, the current time, the time that the current frame would have ideally occurred at, and a reference to the timer instance (so the caller and callback can both access its methods).
Note: All times are based on performance.now, and are relative to the moment that the page loaded.
Timer instances have three API methods:
stop: Takes no args. Kills the timer immediately (and permanently).
Returns the frame index for the next frame (the cancelled frame).
adapt: Takes a frequency in Hertz and adapts the timer to it, beginning
from the next frame. Returns the implied interval in milliseconds.
redefine: Takes a new callback function. Swaps it with the current
callback. Effects the next frame. Returns undefined.
Note: The tick method passes this around explicitly (as self) to work around the problem of this referencing window when the tick method is invoked via setTimeout.
class ProgrammableTimer {
constructor(hertz, callback) {
this.target = performance.now(); // target time for the next frame
this.interval = 1 / hertz * 1000; // the milliseconds between ticks
this.callback = callback;
this.stopped = false;
this.frame = 0;
this.tick(this);
}
tick(self) {
if (self.stopped) return;
const currentTime = performance.now();
const currentTarget = self.target;
const currentInterval = (self.target += self.interval) - currentTime;
setTimeout(self.tick, currentInterval, self);
self.callback(self.frame++, currentTime, currentTarget, self);
}
stop() { this.stopped = true; return this.frame }
adapt(hertz) { return this.interval = 1 / hertz * 1000 }
redefine(replacement) { this.callback = replacement }
}
Doesn't get much more accurate than this.
var seconds = new Date().getTime(), last = seconds,
intrvl = setInterval(function() {
var now = new Date().getTime();
if(now - last > 5){
if(confirm("Delay registered, terminate?")){
clearInterval(intrvl);
return;
}
}
last = now;
timer.innerHTML = now - seconds;
}, 333);
As to why it is not accurate, I would guess that the machine is busy doing other things, slowing down a little on each iteration adds up, as you see.
This is an old question but figured I'd share some code I use sometimes:
function Timer(func, delay, repeat, runAtStart)
{
this.func = func;
this.delay = delay;
this.repeat = repeat || 0;
this.runAtStart = runAtStart;
this.count = 0;
this.startTime = performance.now();
if (this.runAtStart)
this.tick();
else
{
var _this = this;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout( function(){ _this.tick(); }, this.delay);
}
}
Timer.prototype.tick = function()
{
this.func();
this.count++;
if (this.repeat === -1 || (this.repeat > 0 && this.count < this.repeat) )
{
var adjustedDelay = Math.max( 1, this.startTime + ( (this.count+(this.runAtStart ? 2 : 1)) * this.delay ) - performance.now() );
var _this = this;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout( function(){ _this.tick(); }, adjustedDelay);
}
}
Timer.prototype.stop = function()
{
window.clearTimeout(this.timeout);
}
Example:
time = 0;
this.gameTimer = new Timer( function() { time++; }, 1000, -1);
Self-corrects the setTimeout, can run it X number of times (-1 for infinite), can start running instantaneously, and has a counter if you ever need to see how many times the func() has been run. Comes in handy.
Edit: Note, this doesn't do any input checking (like if delay and repeat are the correct type. And you'd probably want to add some kind of get/set function if you wanted to get the count or change the repeat value.
One of my simplest implementations is down below. It can even survive page reloads. :-
Code pen: https://codepen.io/shivabhusal/pen/abvmgaV
$(function() {
var TTimer = {
startedTime: new Date(),
restoredFromSession: false,
started: false,
minutes: 0,
seconds: 0,
tick: function tick() {
// Since setInterval is not reliable in inactive windows/tabs we are using date diff.
var diffInSeconds = Math.floor((new Date() - this.startedTime) / 1000);
this.minutes = Math.floor(diffInSeconds / 60);
this.seconds = diffInSeconds - this.minutes * 60;
this.render();
this.updateSession();
},
utilities: {
pad: function pad(number) {
return number < 10 ? '0' + number : number;
}
},
container: function container() {
return $(document);
},
render: function render() {
this.container().find('#timer-minutes').text(this.utilities.pad(this.minutes));
this.container().find('#timer-seconds').text(this.utilities.pad(this.seconds));
},
updateSession: function updateSession() {
sessionStorage.setItem('timerStartedTime', this.startedTime);
},
clearSession: function clearSession() {
sessionStorage.removeItem('timerStartedTime');
},
restoreFromSession: function restoreFromSession() {
// Using sessionsStorage to make the timer persistent
if (typeof Storage == "undefined") {
console.log('No sessionStorage Support');
return;
}
if (sessionStorage.getItem('timerStartedTime') !== null) {
this.restoredFromSession = true;
this.startedTime = new Date(sessionStorage.getItem('timerStartedTime'));
}
},
start: function start() {
this.restoreFromSession();
this.stop();
this.started = true;
this.tick();
this.timerId = setInterval(this.tick.bind(this), 1000);
},
stop: function stop() {
this.started = false;
clearInterval(this.timerId);
this.render();
}
};
TTimer.start();
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<h1>
<span id="timer-minutes">00</span> :
<span id="timer-seconds">00</span>
</h1>
Inspired by Bergi's answer I created the following complete non drifting timer. What I wanted was a way to set a timer, stop it, and do this simply.
var perfectTimer = { // Set of functions designed to create nearly perfect timers that do not drift
timers: {}, // An object of timers by ID
nextID: 0, // Next available timer reference ID
set: (callback, interval) => { // Set a timer
var expected = Date.now() + interval; // Expected currect time when timeout fires
var ID = perfectTimer.nextID++; // Create reference to timer
function step() { // Adjusts the timeout to account for any drift since last timeout
callback(); // Call the callback
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // The drift (ms) (positive for overshooting) comparing the expected time to the current time
expected += interval; // Set the next expected currect time when timeout fires
perfectTimer.timers[ID] = setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt)); // Take into account drift
}
perfectTimer.timers[ID] = setTimeout(step, interval); // Return reference to timer
return ID;
},
clear: (ID) => { // Clear & delete a timer by ID reference
if (perfectTimer.timers[ID] != undefined) { // Preventing errors when trying to clear a timer that no longer exists
console.log('clear timer:', ID);
console.log('timers before:', perfectTimer.timers);
clearTimeout(perfectTimer.timers[ID]); // Clear timer
delete perfectTimer.timers[ID]; // Delete timer reference
console.log('timers after:', perfectTimer.timers);
}
}
}
// Below are some tests
var timerOne = perfectTimer.set(() => {
console.log(new Date().toString(), Date.now(), 'timerOne', timerOne);
}, 1000);
console.log(timerOne);
setTimeout(() => {
perfectTimer.clear(timerOne);
}, 5000)
var timerTwo = perfectTimer.set(() => {
console.log(new Date().toString(), Date.now(), 'timerTwo', timerTwo);
}, 1000);
console.log(timerTwo);
setTimeout(() => {
perfectTimer.clear(timerTwo);
}, 8000)
driftless is a drop-in replacement for setInterval that mitigates drift. Makes life easy, import the npm package, then use it like setInterval / setTimeout:
setDriftlessInterval(() => {
this.counter--;
}, 1000);
setDriftlessInterval(() => {
this.refreshBounds();
}, 20000);
you can use a function called setTimeout that we can use to set the countdown.
Firstly, create a javascript snippet and add it to your page as follows;
var remainingTime = 30;
var elem = document.getElementById('countdown_div');
var timer = setInterval(countdown, 1000); //set the countdown to every second
function countdown() {
if (remainingTime == -1) {
clearTimeout(timer);
doSomething();
} else {
elem.innerHTML = remainingTime + ' left';
remainingTime--; //we subtract the second each iteration
}
}
Source + more details -> https://www.growthsnippets.com/30-second-countdown-timer-javascript/
Many of these answers here are great, but they typically their code examples are pages and pages of code (the good ones even have instructions on the best way to copy/paste it all). I just wanted to understand this problem with a very simple example.
Working Demo
var lastpause = 0;
var totaltime = 0;
function goFunction(e) {
if(this.innerText == 'Off - Timer Not Going') {
this.innerText = 'On - Timer Going';
} else {
totaltime += Date.now() - lastpause;
this.innerText = 'Off - Timer Not Going';
}
lastpause = Date.now();
document.getElementById('count').innerText = totaltime + ' milliseconds.';
}
document.getElementById('button').addEventListener('click', goFunction);
<button id="button">Off - Timer Not Going</button> <br>
Seconds: <span id="count">0 milliseconds.</span>
Explanation of Demo
totaltime — This is the total time calculated.
lastpause — This is the only real temporary variable we have. Whenever someone hits pause, we set lastpause to Date.now(). When someone unpauses, and re-pauses again, we calculate the time diff of Date.now() subtracted from the last pause.
We only need those two variables: Our total and the last time we stopped the timer. The other answers seem to use this approach, but I wanted a compact explanation.
I gave up building my own and ended up using this neat library.
I need to create a simple but accurate timer.
This is my code:
var seconds = 0;
setInterval(function() {
timer.innerHTML = seconds++;
}, 1000);
After exactly 3600 seconds, it prints about 3500 seconds.
Why is it not accurate?
How can I create an accurate timer?
Why is it not accurate?
Because you are using setTimeout() or setInterval(). They cannot be trusted, there are no accuracy guarantees for them. They are allowed to lag arbitrarily, and they do not keep a constant pace but tend to drift (as you have observed).
How can I create an accurate timer?
Use the Date object instead to get the (millisecond-)accurate, current time. Then base your logic on the current time value, instead of counting how often your callback has been executed.
For a simple timer or clock, keep track of the time difference explicitly:
var start = Date.now();
setInterval(function() {
var delta = Date.now() - start; // milliseconds elapsed since start
…
output(Math.floor(delta / 1000)); // in seconds
// alternatively just show wall clock time:
output(new Date().toUTCString());
}, 1000); // update about every second
Now, that has the problem of possibly jumping values. When the interval lags a bit and executes your callback after 990, 1993, 2996, 3999, 5002 milliseconds, you will see the second count 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 (!). So it would be advisable to update more often, like about every 100ms, to avoid such jumps.
However, sometimes you really need a steady interval executing your callbacks without drifting. This requires a bit more advanced strategy (and code), though it pays out well (and registers less timeouts). Those are known as self-adjusting timers. Here the exact delay for each of the repeated timeouts is adapted to the actually elapsed time, compared to the expected intervals:
var interval = 1000; // ms
var expected = Date.now() + interval;
setTimeout(step, interval);
function step() {
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // the drift (positive for overshooting)
if (dt > interval) {
// something really bad happened. Maybe the browser (tab) was inactive?
// possibly special handling to avoid futile "catch up" run
}
… // do what is to be done
expected += interval;
setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt)); // take into account drift
}
I'ma just build on Bergi's answer (specifically the second part) a little bit because I really liked the way it was done, but I want the option to stop the timer once it starts (like clearInterval() almost). Sooo... I've wrapped it up into a constructor function so we can do 'objecty' things with it.
1. Constructor
Alright, so you copy/paste that...
/**
* Self-adjusting interval to account for drifting
*
* #param {function} workFunc Callback containing the work to be done
* for each interval
* #param {int} interval Interval speed (in milliseconds)
* #param {function} errorFunc (Optional) Callback to run if the drift
* exceeds interval
*/
function AdjustingInterval(workFunc, interval, errorFunc) {
var that = this;
var expected, timeout;
this.interval = interval;
this.start = function() {
expected = Date.now() + this.interval;
timeout = setTimeout(step, this.interval);
}
this.stop = function() {
clearTimeout(timeout);
}
function step() {
var drift = Date.now() - expected;
if (drift > that.interval) {
// You could have some default stuff here too...
if (errorFunc) errorFunc();
}
workFunc();
expected += that.interval;
timeout = setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, that.interval-drift));
}
}
2. Instantiate
Tell it what to do and all that...
// For testing purposes, we'll just increment
// this and send it out to the console.
var justSomeNumber = 0;
// Define the work to be done
var doWork = function() {
console.log(++justSomeNumber);
};
// Define what to do if something goes wrong
var doError = function() {
console.warn('The drift exceeded the interval.');
};
// (The third argument is optional)
var ticker = new AdjustingInterval(doWork, 1000, doError);
3. Then do... stuff
// You can start or stop your timer at will
ticker.start();
ticker.stop();
// You can also change the interval while it's in progress
ticker.interval = 99;
I mean, it works for me anyway. If there's a better way, lemme know.
Bergi's answer pinpoints exactly why the timer from the question is not accurate. Here's my take on a simple JS timer with start, stop, reset and getTime methods:
class Timer {
constructor () {
this.isRunning = false;
this.startTime = 0;
this.overallTime = 0;
}
_getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart () {
if (!this.startTime) {
return 0;
}
return Date.now() - this.startTime;
}
start () {
if (this.isRunning) {
return console.error('Timer is already running');
}
this.isRunning = true;
this.startTime = Date.now();
}
stop () {
if (!this.isRunning) {
return console.error('Timer is already stopped');
}
this.isRunning = false;
this.overallTime = this.overallTime + this._getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart();
}
reset () {
this.overallTime = 0;
if (this.isRunning) {
this.startTime = Date.now();
return;
}
this.startTime = 0;
}
getTime () {
if (!this.startTime) {
return 0;
}
if (this.isRunning) {
return this.overallTime + this._getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart();
}
return this.overallTime;
}
}
const timer = new Timer();
timer.start();
setInterval(() => {
const timeInSeconds = Math.round(timer.getTime() / 1000);
document.getElementById('time').innerText = timeInSeconds;
}, 100)
<p>Elapsed time: <span id="time">0</span>s</p>
The snippet also includes a solution for your problem. So instead of incrementing seconds variable every 1000ms interval, we just start the timer and then every 100ms* we just read elapsed time from the timer and update the view accordingly.
* - makes it more accurate than 1000ms
To make your timer more accurate, you would have to round
Most of the timers in the answers here will linger behind the expected time because they set the "expected" value to the ideal and only account for the delay that the browser introduced before that point. This is fine if you just need accurate intervals, but if you are timing relative to other events then you will (nearly) always have this delay.
To correct it, you can keep track of the drift history and use it to predict future drift. By adding a secondary adjustment with this preemptive correction, the variance in the drift centers around the target time. For example, if you're always getting a drift of 20 to 40ms, this adjustment would shift it to -10 to +10ms around the target time.
Building on Bergi's answer, I've used a rolling median for my prediction algorithm. Taking just 10 samples with this method makes a reasonable difference.
var interval = 200; // ms
var expected = Date.now() + interval;
var drift_history = [];
var drift_history_samples = 10;
var drift_correction = 0;
function calc_drift(arr){
// Calculate drift correction.
/*
In this example I've used a simple median.
You can use other methods, but it's important not to use an average.
If the user switches tabs and back, an average would put far too much
weight on the outlier.
*/
var values = arr.concat(); // copy array so it isn't mutated
values.sort(function(a,b){
return a-b;
});
if(values.length ===0) return 0;
var half = Math.floor(values.length / 2);
if (values.length % 2) return values[half];
var median = (values[half - 1] + values[half]) / 2.0;
return median;
}
setTimeout(step, interval);
function step() {
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // the drift (positive for overshooting)
if (dt > interval) {
// something really bad happened. Maybe the browser (tab) was inactive?
// possibly special handling to avoid futile "catch up" run
}
// do what is to be done
// don't update the history for exceptionally large values
if (dt <= interval) {
// sample drift amount to history after removing current correction
// (add to remove because the correction is applied by subtraction)
drift_history.push(dt + drift_correction);
// predict new drift correction
drift_correction = calc_drift(drift_history);
// cap and refresh samples
if (drift_history.length >= drift_history_samples) {
drift_history.shift();
}
}
expected += interval;
// take into account drift with prediction
setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt - drift_correction));
}
I agree with Bergi on using Date, but his solution was a bit of overkill for my use. I simply wanted my animated clock (digital and analog SVGs) to update on the second and not overrun or under run creating obvious jumps in the clock updates. Here is the snippet of code I put in my clock update functions:
var milliseconds = now.getMilliseconds();
var newTimeout = 1000 - milliseconds;
this.timeoutVariable = setTimeout((function(thisObj) { return function() { thisObj.update(); } })(this), newTimeout);
It simply calculates the delta time to the next even second, and sets the timeout to that delta. This syncs all of my clock objects to the second. Hope this is helpful.
Here's a solution that pauses when the window is hidden, and can be cancelled with an abort controller.
function animationInterval(ms, signal, callback) {
const start = document.timeline.currentTime;
function frame(time) {
if (signal.aborted) return;
callback(time);
scheduleFrame(time);
}
function scheduleFrame(time) {
const elapsed = time - start;
const roundedElapsed = Math.round(elapsed / ms) * ms;
const targetNext = start + roundedElapsed + ms;
const delay = targetNext - performance.now();
setTimeout(() => requestAnimationFrame(frame), delay);
}
scheduleFrame(start);
}
Usage:
const controller = new AbortController();
// Create an animation callback every second:
animationInterval(1000, controller.signal, time => {
console.log('tick!', time);
});
// And stop it sometime later:
controller.abort();
Modern, Fully Programmable Timer
This timer takes a frequency in Hertz, and a callback that can take up to four arguments, the current frame index, the current time, the time that the current frame would have ideally occurred at, and a reference to the timer instance (so the caller and callback can both access its methods).
Note: All times are based on performance.now, and are relative to the moment that the page loaded.
Timer instances have three API methods:
stop: Takes no args. Kills the timer immediately (and permanently).
Returns the frame index for the next frame (the cancelled frame).
adapt: Takes a frequency in Hertz and adapts the timer to it, beginning
from the next frame. Returns the implied interval in milliseconds.
redefine: Takes a new callback function. Swaps it with the current
callback. Effects the next frame. Returns undefined.
Note: The tick method passes this around explicitly (as self) to work around the problem of this referencing window when the tick method is invoked via setTimeout.
class ProgrammableTimer {
constructor(hertz, callback) {
this.target = performance.now(); // target time for the next frame
this.interval = 1 / hertz * 1000; // the milliseconds between ticks
this.callback = callback;
this.stopped = false;
this.frame = 0;
this.tick(this);
}
tick(self) {
if (self.stopped) return;
const currentTime = performance.now();
const currentTarget = self.target;
const currentInterval = (self.target += self.interval) - currentTime;
setTimeout(self.tick, currentInterval, self);
self.callback(self.frame++, currentTime, currentTarget, self);
}
stop() { this.stopped = true; return this.frame }
adapt(hertz) { return this.interval = 1 / hertz * 1000 }
redefine(replacement) { this.callback = replacement }
}
Doesn't get much more accurate than this.
var seconds = new Date().getTime(), last = seconds,
intrvl = setInterval(function() {
var now = new Date().getTime();
if(now - last > 5){
if(confirm("Delay registered, terminate?")){
clearInterval(intrvl);
return;
}
}
last = now;
timer.innerHTML = now - seconds;
}, 333);
As to why it is not accurate, I would guess that the machine is busy doing other things, slowing down a little on each iteration adds up, as you see.
This is an old question but figured I'd share some code I use sometimes:
function Timer(func, delay, repeat, runAtStart)
{
this.func = func;
this.delay = delay;
this.repeat = repeat || 0;
this.runAtStart = runAtStart;
this.count = 0;
this.startTime = performance.now();
if (this.runAtStart)
this.tick();
else
{
var _this = this;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout( function(){ _this.tick(); }, this.delay);
}
}
Timer.prototype.tick = function()
{
this.func();
this.count++;
if (this.repeat === -1 || (this.repeat > 0 && this.count < this.repeat) )
{
var adjustedDelay = Math.max( 1, this.startTime + ( (this.count+(this.runAtStart ? 2 : 1)) * this.delay ) - performance.now() );
var _this = this;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout( function(){ _this.tick(); }, adjustedDelay);
}
}
Timer.prototype.stop = function()
{
window.clearTimeout(this.timeout);
}
Example:
time = 0;
this.gameTimer = new Timer( function() { time++; }, 1000, -1);
Self-corrects the setTimeout, can run it X number of times (-1 for infinite), can start running instantaneously, and has a counter if you ever need to see how many times the func() has been run. Comes in handy.
Edit: Note, this doesn't do any input checking (like if delay and repeat are the correct type. And you'd probably want to add some kind of get/set function if you wanted to get the count or change the repeat value.
One of my simplest implementations is down below. It can even survive page reloads. :-
Code pen: https://codepen.io/shivabhusal/pen/abvmgaV
$(function() {
var TTimer = {
startedTime: new Date(),
restoredFromSession: false,
started: false,
minutes: 0,
seconds: 0,
tick: function tick() {
// Since setInterval is not reliable in inactive windows/tabs we are using date diff.
var diffInSeconds = Math.floor((new Date() - this.startedTime) / 1000);
this.minutes = Math.floor(diffInSeconds / 60);
this.seconds = diffInSeconds - this.minutes * 60;
this.render();
this.updateSession();
},
utilities: {
pad: function pad(number) {
return number < 10 ? '0' + number : number;
}
},
container: function container() {
return $(document);
},
render: function render() {
this.container().find('#timer-minutes').text(this.utilities.pad(this.minutes));
this.container().find('#timer-seconds').text(this.utilities.pad(this.seconds));
},
updateSession: function updateSession() {
sessionStorage.setItem('timerStartedTime', this.startedTime);
},
clearSession: function clearSession() {
sessionStorage.removeItem('timerStartedTime');
},
restoreFromSession: function restoreFromSession() {
// Using sessionsStorage to make the timer persistent
if (typeof Storage == "undefined") {
console.log('No sessionStorage Support');
return;
}
if (sessionStorage.getItem('timerStartedTime') !== null) {
this.restoredFromSession = true;
this.startedTime = new Date(sessionStorage.getItem('timerStartedTime'));
}
},
start: function start() {
this.restoreFromSession();
this.stop();
this.started = true;
this.tick();
this.timerId = setInterval(this.tick.bind(this), 1000);
},
stop: function stop() {
this.started = false;
clearInterval(this.timerId);
this.render();
}
};
TTimer.start();
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<h1>
<span id="timer-minutes">00</span> :
<span id="timer-seconds">00</span>
</h1>
Inspired by Bergi's answer I created the following complete non drifting timer. What I wanted was a way to set a timer, stop it, and do this simply.
var perfectTimer = { // Set of functions designed to create nearly perfect timers that do not drift
timers: {}, // An object of timers by ID
nextID: 0, // Next available timer reference ID
set: (callback, interval) => { // Set a timer
var expected = Date.now() + interval; // Expected currect time when timeout fires
var ID = perfectTimer.nextID++; // Create reference to timer
function step() { // Adjusts the timeout to account for any drift since last timeout
callback(); // Call the callback
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // The drift (ms) (positive for overshooting) comparing the expected time to the current time
expected += interval; // Set the next expected currect time when timeout fires
perfectTimer.timers[ID] = setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt)); // Take into account drift
}
perfectTimer.timers[ID] = setTimeout(step, interval); // Return reference to timer
return ID;
},
clear: (ID) => { // Clear & delete a timer by ID reference
if (perfectTimer.timers[ID] != undefined) { // Preventing errors when trying to clear a timer that no longer exists
console.log('clear timer:', ID);
console.log('timers before:', perfectTimer.timers);
clearTimeout(perfectTimer.timers[ID]); // Clear timer
delete perfectTimer.timers[ID]; // Delete timer reference
console.log('timers after:', perfectTimer.timers);
}
}
}
// Below are some tests
var timerOne = perfectTimer.set(() => {
console.log(new Date().toString(), Date.now(), 'timerOne', timerOne);
}, 1000);
console.log(timerOne);
setTimeout(() => {
perfectTimer.clear(timerOne);
}, 5000)
var timerTwo = perfectTimer.set(() => {
console.log(new Date().toString(), Date.now(), 'timerTwo', timerTwo);
}, 1000);
console.log(timerTwo);
setTimeout(() => {
perfectTimer.clear(timerTwo);
}, 8000)
driftless is a drop-in replacement for setInterval that mitigates drift. Makes life easy, import the npm package, then use it like setInterval / setTimeout:
setDriftlessInterval(() => {
this.counter--;
}, 1000);
setDriftlessInterval(() => {
this.refreshBounds();
}, 20000);
you can use a function called setTimeout that we can use to set the countdown.
Firstly, create a javascript snippet and add it to your page as follows;
var remainingTime = 30;
var elem = document.getElementById('countdown_div');
var timer = setInterval(countdown, 1000); //set the countdown to every second
function countdown() {
if (remainingTime == -1) {
clearTimeout(timer);
doSomething();
} else {
elem.innerHTML = remainingTime + ' left';
remainingTime--; //we subtract the second each iteration
}
}
Source + more details -> https://www.growthsnippets.com/30-second-countdown-timer-javascript/
Many of these answers here are great, but they typically their code examples are pages and pages of code (the good ones even have instructions on the best way to copy/paste it all). I just wanted to understand this problem with a very simple example.
Working Demo
var lastpause = 0;
var totaltime = 0;
function goFunction(e) {
if(this.innerText == 'Off - Timer Not Going') {
this.innerText = 'On - Timer Going';
} else {
totaltime += Date.now() - lastpause;
this.innerText = 'Off - Timer Not Going';
}
lastpause = Date.now();
document.getElementById('count').innerText = totaltime + ' milliseconds.';
}
document.getElementById('button').addEventListener('click', goFunction);
<button id="button">Off - Timer Not Going</button> <br>
Seconds: <span id="count">0 milliseconds.</span>
Explanation of Demo
totaltime — This is the total time calculated.
lastpause — This is the only real temporary variable we have. Whenever someone hits pause, we set lastpause to Date.now(). When someone unpauses, and re-pauses again, we calculate the time diff of Date.now() subtracted from the last pause.
We only need those two variables: Our total and the last time we stopped the timer. The other answers seem to use this approach, but I wanted a compact explanation.
I gave up building my own and ended up using this neat library.
I need to create a simple but accurate timer.
This is my code:
var seconds = 0;
setInterval(function() {
timer.innerHTML = seconds++;
}, 1000);
After exactly 3600 seconds, it prints about 3500 seconds.
Why is it not accurate?
How can I create an accurate timer?
Why is it not accurate?
Because you are using setTimeout() or setInterval(). They cannot be trusted, there are no accuracy guarantees for them. They are allowed to lag arbitrarily, and they do not keep a constant pace but tend to drift (as you have observed).
How can I create an accurate timer?
Use the Date object instead to get the (millisecond-)accurate, current time. Then base your logic on the current time value, instead of counting how often your callback has been executed.
For a simple timer or clock, keep track of the time difference explicitly:
var start = Date.now();
setInterval(function() {
var delta = Date.now() - start; // milliseconds elapsed since start
…
output(Math.floor(delta / 1000)); // in seconds
// alternatively just show wall clock time:
output(new Date().toUTCString());
}, 1000); // update about every second
Now, that has the problem of possibly jumping values. When the interval lags a bit and executes your callback after 990, 1993, 2996, 3999, 5002 milliseconds, you will see the second count 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 (!). So it would be advisable to update more often, like about every 100ms, to avoid such jumps.
However, sometimes you really need a steady interval executing your callbacks without drifting. This requires a bit more advanced strategy (and code), though it pays out well (and registers less timeouts). Those are known as self-adjusting timers. Here the exact delay for each of the repeated timeouts is adapted to the actually elapsed time, compared to the expected intervals:
var interval = 1000; // ms
var expected = Date.now() + interval;
setTimeout(step, interval);
function step() {
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // the drift (positive for overshooting)
if (dt > interval) {
// something really bad happened. Maybe the browser (tab) was inactive?
// possibly special handling to avoid futile "catch up" run
}
… // do what is to be done
expected += interval;
setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt)); // take into account drift
}
I'ma just build on Bergi's answer (specifically the second part) a little bit because I really liked the way it was done, but I want the option to stop the timer once it starts (like clearInterval() almost). Sooo... I've wrapped it up into a constructor function so we can do 'objecty' things with it.
1. Constructor
Alright, so you copy/paste that...
/**
* Self-adjusting interval to account for drifting
*
* #param {function} workFunc Callback containing the work to be done
* for each interval
* #param {int} interval Interval speed (in milliseconds)
* #param {function} errorFunc (Optional) Callback to run if the drift
* exceeds interval
*/
function AdjustingInterval(workFunc, interval, errorFunc) {
var that = this;
var expected, timeout;
this.interval = interval;
this.start = function() {
expected = Date.now() + this.interval;
timeout = setTimeout(step, this.interval);
}
this.stop = function() {
clearTimeout(timeout);
}
function step() {
var drift = Date.now() - expected;
if (drift > that.interval) {
// You could have some default stuff here too...
if (errorFunc) errorFunc();
}
workFunc();
expected += that.interval;
timeout = setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, that.interval-drift));
}
}
2. Instantiate
Tell it what to do and all that...
// For testing purposes, we'll just increment
// this and send it out to the console.
var justSomeNumber = 0;
// Define the work to be done
var doWork = function() {
console.log(++justSomeNumber);
};
// Define what to do if something goes wrong
var doError = function() {
console.warn('The drift exceeded the interval.');
};
// (The third argument is optional)
var ticker = new AdjustingInterval(doWork, 1000, doError);
3. Then do... stuff
// You can start or stop your timer at will
ticker.start();
ticker.stop();
// You can also change the interval while it's in progress
ticker.interval = 99;
I mean, it works for me anyway. If there's a better way, lemme know.
Bergi's answer pinpoints exactly why the timer from the question is not accurate. Here's my take on a simple JS timer with start, stop, reset and getTime methods:
class Timer {
constructor () {
this.isRunning = false;
this.startTime = 0;
this.overallTime = 0;
}
_getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart () {
if (!this.startTime) {
return 0;
}
return Date.now() - this.startTime;
}
start () {
if (this.isRunning) {
return console.error('Timer is already running');
}
this.isRunning = true;
this.startTime = Date.now();
}
stop () {
if (!this.isRunning) {
return console.error('Timer is already stopped');
}
this.isRunning = false;
this.overallTime = this.overallTime + this._getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart();
}
reset () {
this.overallTime = 0;
if (this.isRunning) {
this.startTime = Date.now();
return;
}
this.startTime = 0;
}
getTime () {
if (!this.startTime) {
return 0;
}
if (this.isRunning) {
return this.overallTime + this._getTimeElapsedSinceLastStart();
}
return this.overallTime;
}
}
const timer = new Timer();
timer.start();
setInterval(() => {
const timeInSeconds = Math.round(timer.getTime() / 1000);
document.getElementById('time').innerText = timeInSeconds;
}, 100)
<p>Elapsed time: <span id="time">0</span>s</p>
The snippet also includes a solution for your problem. So instead of incrementing seconds variable every 1000ms interval, we just start the timer and then every 100ms* we just read elapsed time from the timer and update the view accordingly.
* - makes it more accurate than 1000ms
To make your timer more accurate, you would have to round
Most of the timers in the answers here will linger behind the expected time because they set the "expected" value to the ideal and only account for the delay that the browser introduced before that point. This is fine if you just need accurate intervals, but if you are timing relative to other events then you will (nearly) always have this delay.
To correct it, you can keep track of the drift history and use it to predict future drift. By adding a secondary adjustment with this preemptive correction, the variance in the drift centers around the target time. For example, if you're always getting a drift of 20 to 40ms, this adjustment would shift it to -10 to +10ms around the target time.
Building on Bergi's answer, I've used a rolling median for my prediction algorithm. Taking just 10 samples with this method makes a reasonable difference.
var interval = 200; // ms
var expected = Date.now() + interval;
var drift_history = [];
var drift_history_samples = 10;
var drift_correction = 0;
function calc_drift(arr){
// Calculate drift correction.
/*
In this example I've used a simple median.
You can use other methods, but it's important not to use an average.
If the user switches tabs and back, an average would put far too much
weight on the outlier.
*/
var values = arr.concat(); // copy array so it isn't mutated
values.sort(function(a,b){
return a-b;
});
if(values.length ===0) return 0;
var half = Math.floor(values.length / 2);
if (values.length % 2) return values[half];
var median = (values[half - 1] + values[half]) / 2.0;
return median;
}
setTimeout(step, interval);
function step() {
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // the drift (positive for overshooting)
if (dt > interval) {
// something really bad happened. Maybe the browser (tab) was inactive?
// possibly special handling to avoid futile "catch up" run
}
// do what is to be done
// don't update the history for exceptionally large values
if (dt <= interval) {
// sample drift amount to history after removing current correction
// (add to remove because the correction is applied by subtraction)
drift_history.push(dt + drift_correction);
// predict new drift correction
drift_correction = calc_drift(drift_history);
// cap and refresh samples
if (drift_history.length >= drift_history_samples) {
drift_history.shift();
}
}
expected += interval;
// take into account drift with prediction
setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt - drift_correction));
}
I agree with Bergi on using Date, but his solution was a bit of overkill for my use. I simply wanted my animated clock (digital and analog SVGs) to update on the second and not overrun or under run creating obvious jumps in the clock updates. Here is the snippet of code I put in my clock update functions:
var milliseconds = now.getMilliseconds();
var newTimeout = 1000 - milliseconds;
this.timeoutVariable = setTimeout((function(thisObj) { return function() { thisObj.update(); } })(this), newTimeout);
It simply calculates the delta time to the next even second, and sets the timeout to that delta. This syncs all of my clock objects to the second. Hope this is helpful.
Here's a solution that pauses when the window is hidden, and can be cancelled with an abort controller.
function animationInterval(ms, signal, callback) {
const start = document.timeline.currentTime;
function frame(time) {
if (signal.aborted) return;
callback(time);
scheduleFrame(time);
}
function scheduleFrame(time) {
const elapsed = time - start;
const roundedElapsed = Math.round(elapsed / ms) * ms;
const targetNext = start + roundedElapsed + ms;
const delay = targetNext - performance.now();
setTimeout(() => requestAnimationFrame(frame), delay);
}
scheduleFrame(start);
}
Usage:
const controller = new AbortController();
// Create an animation callback every second:
animationInterval(1000, controller.signal, time => {
console.log('tick!', time);
});
// And stop it sometime later:
controller.abort();
Modern, Fully Programmable Timer
This timer takes a frequency in Hertz, and a callback that can take up to four arguments, the current frame index, the current time, the time that the current frame would have ideally occurred at, and a reference to the timer instance (so the caller and callback can both access its methods).
Note: All times are based on performance.now, and are relative to the moment that the page loaded.
Timer instances have three API methods:
stop: Takes no args. Kills the timer immediately (and permanently).
Returns the frame index for the next frame (the cancelled frame).
adapt: Takes a frequency in Hertz and adapts the timer to it, beginning
from the next frame. Returns the implied interval in milliseconds.
redefine: Takes a new callback function. Swaps it with the current
callback. Effects the next frame. Returns undefined.
Note: The tick method passes this around explicitly (as self) to work around the problem of this referencing window when the tick method is invoked via setTimeout.
class ProgrammableTimer {
constructor(hertz, callback) {
this.target = performance.now(); // target time for the next frame
this.interval = 1 / hertz * 1000; // the milliseconds between ticks
this.callback = callback;
this.stopped = false;
this.frame = 0;
this.tick(this);
}
tick(self) {
if (self.stopped) return;
const currentTime = performance.now();
const currentTarget = self.target;
const currentInterval = (self.target += self.interval) - currentTime;
setTimeout(self.tick, currentInterval, self);
self.callback(self.frame++, currentTime, currentTarget, self);
}
stop() { this.stopped = true; return this.frame }
adapt(hertz) { return this.interval = 1 / hertz * 1000 }
redefine(replacement) { this.callback = replacement }
}
Doesn't get much more accurate than this.
var seconds = new Date().getTime(), last = seconds,
intrvl = setInterval(function() {
var now = new Date().getTime();
if(now - last > 5){
if(confirm("Delay registered, terminate?")){
clearInterval(intrvl);
return;
}
}
last = now;
timer.innerHTML = now - seconds;
}, 333);
As to why it is not accurate, I would guess that the machine is busy doing other things, slowing down a little on each iteration adds up, as you see.
This is an old question but figured I'd share some code I use sometimes:
function Timer(func, delay, repeat, runAtStart)
{
this.func = func;
this.delay = delay;
this.repeat = repeat || 0;
this.runAtStart = runAtStart;
this.count = 0;
this.startTime = performance.now();
if (this.runAtStart)
this.tick();
else
{
var _this = this;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout( function(){ _this.tick(); }, this.delay);
}
}
Timer.prototype.tick = function()
{
this.func();
this.count++;
if (this.repeat === -1 || (this.repeat > 0 && this.count < this.repeat) )
{
var adjustedDelay = Math.max( 1, this.startTime + ( (this.count+(this.runAtStart ? 2 : 1)) * this.delay ) - performance.now() );
var _this = this;
this.timeout = window.setTimeout( function(){ _this.tick(); }, adjustedDelay);
}
}
Timer.prototype.stop = function()
{
window.clearTimeout(this.timeout);
}
Example:
time = 0;
this.gameTimer = new Timer( function() { time++; }, 1000, -1);
Self-corrects the setTimeout, can run it X number of times (-1 for infinite), can start running instantaneously, and has a counter if you ever need to see how many times the func() has been run. Comes in handy.
Edit: Note, this doesn't do any input checking (like if delay and repeat are the correct type. And you'd probably want to add some kind of get/set function if you wanted to get the count or change the repeat value.
One of my simplest implementations is down below. It can even survive page reloads. :-
Code pen: https://codepen.io/shivabhusal/pen/abvmgaV
$(function() {
var TTimer = {
startedTime: new Date(),
restoredFromSession: false,
started: false,
minutes: 0,
seconds: 0,
tick: function tick() {
// Since setInterval is not reliable in inactive windows/tabs we are using date diff.
var diffInSeconds = Math.floor((new Date() - this.startedTime) / 1000);
this.minutes = Math.floor(diffInSeconds / 60);
this.seconds = diffInSeconds - this.minutes * 60;
this.render();
this.updateSession();
},
utilities: {
pad: function pad(number) {
return number < 10 ? '0' + number : number;
}
},
container: function container() {
return $(document);
},
render: function render() {
this.container().find('#timer-minutes').text(this.utilities.pad(this.minutes));
this.container().find('#timer-seconds').text(this.utilities.pad(this.seconds));
},
updateSession: function updateSession() {
sessionStorage.setItem('timerStartedTime', this.startedTime);
},
clearSession: function clearSession() {
sessionStorage.removeItem('timerStartedTime');
},
restoreFromSession: function restoreFromSession() {
// Using sessionsStorage to make the timer persistent
if (typeof Storage == "undefined") {
console.log('No sessionStorage Support');
return;
}
if (sessionStorage.getItem('timerStartedTime') !== null) {
this.restoredFromSession = true;
this.startedTime = new Date(sessionStorage.getItem('timerStartedTime'));
}
},
start: function start() {
this.restoreFromSession();
this.stop();
this.started = true;
this.tick();
this.timerId = setInterval(this.tick.bind(this), 1000);
},
stop: function stop() {
this.started = false;
clearInterval(this.timerId);
this.render();
}
};
TTimer.start();
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.12.4/jquery.min.js"></script>
<h1>
<span id="timer-minutes">00</span> :
<span id="timer-seconds">00</span>
</h1>
Inspired by Bergi's answer I created the following complete non drifting timer. What I wanted was a way to set a timer, stop it, and do this simply.
var perfectTimer = { // Set of functions designed to create nearly perfect timers that do not drift
timers: {}, // An object of timers by ID
nextID: 0, // Next available timer reference ID
set: (callback, interval) => { // Set a timer
var expected = Date.now() + interval; // Expected currect time when timeout fires
var ID = perfectTimer.nextID++; // Create reference to timer
function step() { // Adjusts the timeout to account for any drift since last timeout
callback(); // Call the callback
var dt = Date.now() - expected; // The drift (ms) (positive for overshooting) comparing the expected time to the current time
expected += interval; // Set the next expected currect time when timeout fires
perfectTimer.timers[ID] = setTimeout(step, Math.max(0, interval - dt)); // Take into account drift
}
perfectTimer.timers[ID] = setTimeout(step, interval); // Return reference to timer
return ID;
},
clear: (ID) => { // Clear & delete a timer by ID reference
if (perfectTimer.timers[ID] != undefined) { // Preventing errors when trying to clear a timer that no longer exists
console.log('clear timer:', ID);
console.log('timers before:', perfectTimer.timers);
clearTimeout(perfectTimer.timers[ID]); // Clear timer
delete perfectTimer.timers[ID]; // Delete timer reference
console.log('timers after:', perfectTimer.timers);
}
}
}
// Below are some tests
var timerOne = perfectTimer.set(() => {
console.log(new Date().toString(), Date.now(), 'timerOne', timerOne);
}, 1000);
console.log(timerOne);
setTimeout(() => {
perfectTimer.clear(timerOne);
}, 5000)
var timerTwo = perfectTimer.set(() => {
console.log(new Date().toString(), Date.now(), 'timerTwo', timerTwo);
}, 1000);
console.log(timerTwo);
setTimeout(() => {
perfectTimer.clear(timerTwo);
}, 8000)
driftless is a drop-in replacement for setInterval that mitigates drift. Makes life easy, import the npm package, then use it like setInterval / setTimeout:
setDriftlessInterval(() => {
this.counter--;
}, 1000);
setDriftlessInterval(() => {
this.refreshBounds();
}, 20000);
you can use a function called setTimeout that we can use to set the countdown.
Firstly, create a javascript snippet and add it to your page as follows;
var remainingTime = 30;
var elem = document.getElementById('countdown_div');
var timer = setInterval(countdown, 1000); //set the countdown to every second
function countdown() {
if (remainingTime == -1) {
clearTimeout(timer);
doSomething();
} else {
elem.innerHTML = remainingTime + ' left';
remainingTime--; //we subtract the second each iteration
}
}
Source + more details -> https://www.growthsnippets.com/30-second-countdown-timer-javascript/
Many of these answers here are great, but they typically their code examples are pages and pages of code (the good ones even have instructions on the best way to copy/paste it all). I just wanted to understand this problem with a very simple example.
Working Demo
var lastpause = 0;
var totaltime = 0;
function goFunction(e) {
if(this.innerText == 'Off - Timer Not Going') {
this.innerText = 'On - Timer Going';
} else {
totaltime += Date.now() - lastpause;
this.innerText = 'Off - Timer Not Going';
}
lastpause = Date.now();
document.getElementById('count').innerText = totaltime + ' milliseconds.';
}
document.getElementById('button').addEventListener('click', goFunction);
<button id="button">Off - Timer Not Going</button> <br>
Seconds: <span id="count">0 milliseconds.</span>
Explanation of Demo
totaltime — This is the total time calculated.
lastpause — This is the only real temporary variable we have. Whenever someone hits pause, we set lastpause to Date.now(). When someone unpauses, and re-pauses again, we calculate the time diff of Date.now() subtracted from the last pause.
We only need those two variables: Our total and the last time we stopped the timer. The other answers seem to use this approach, but I wanted a compact explanation.
I gave up building my own and ended up using this neat library.
setTimeout(func,delay) seems to fire very precisely at the specified time, as long as the page is not running some script while it is trying to fire the function. But is there a way to take lag into account?
For example if I set a 3sec timeout and javascript runs some heavy code which makes the page leggy for a while. As long as processing the "heavy code" is done by the 3sec it will timeout after ~3sec.
Is there a way to take the "heavy code" processing time into account and timeout after 3sec + the time the page was blocked?
Here is a jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/me2loveit2/mCj2J/
var timeStart = new Date().getTime();
setTimeout(test, 3000); //<-- timeout should be 100
function test() {
var timeAfter100MS = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Timeout Fired at: <br>' + (timeAfter100MS - timeStart) + 'ms<br> (should be ~3000, but it did not take the blocked time into account.)');
}
function block() {
for (var i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {};
}
block();
block();
block();
var timeEnd = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Page was blocked(running importaint code :)) for:<br>' + (timeEnd - timeStart) + 'ms<br>');
As #adeneo pointed out, there is no such possibility. You simply can't know how effectively processor is running your code at the other end, or the tasks it is currently making which might slow it down further. Every case is different. setTimeout tries to match the specified time but very often, it just can't be exact.
I think the solution is just to change your mindset. Try to avoid long blocking synchronous operations such as for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {}; When you drop or modify these you can have more accurate setTimeout firing. The reason being, that there will be smaller executable chunks in the event queue.
Generally speaking, there are different ways to do processing of blocking events. For instance, you could look into Web workers or yielding setTimeout calls. (See links at the end of this post).
Hence, I don't know your specific case, but if you are trying to make many setTimeout calls just as in game programming (loops) solution is to try to alter future setTimeout calls to contain smaller value so the full loop will try to catch up the simulation to match the specific frame rate.
This is usually done with combination of requestAnimationFrame.
Short example of a loop which attemps to run 30 fps in the browser:
You can also view it in js fiddle
/**
* This is example to run loop with 30fps in the browser
*
*/
var gl = {
now: new Date().getTime(),
dt: 0.0,
last: new Date().getTime(),
// physics with 0.033333 steps
step: 1 / 30
},
frames = 0,
started = new Date().getTime();
/**
* Game loop
*
*/
var gameLoop = function () {
gl.now = new Date().getTime();
gl.dt = gl.dt + Math.min(1, (gl.now - gl.last) / 1000);
while (gl.dt > gl.step) {
gl.dt = gl.dt - gl.step;
// Increase frames
frames++;
if(frames === 30) {
// How long it took to execute 30 frames in 1000 ms ?
document.body.innerHTML = "We executed 30 frames in " + (new Date().getTime() - started) + " ms.";
started = new Date().getTime();
frames = 0;
}
}
// last
gl.last = gl.now;
// next
requestAnimationFrame(gameLoop);
};
// Start the game loop
gameLoop();
Hopefully, this gave you some ideas. Thus, don't forget to use css transitions and similar when those can be applied.
For further reading, I recommend:
Yielding setTimeout calls
How to avoid blocking the browser while doing heavy work
Using Web Workers
Cheers.
Not sure I understand the question 100%, but if you do something like this, you're able to see if the other stuff (heavy processing) is not done by the time the timeout runs. This should take about 5 seconds, if you switch the 2000000000 to a 20000 (less proccessing), it should come back at 3 seconds.
var timeStart = new Date().getTime();
setTimeout(test, 3000); //<-- timeout should be 100
var currentTime = new Date().getTime();
function test() {
if (currentTime - timeStart < 3000){
var timeAfter100MS = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Took less than 3 seconds - ' + (timeAfter100MS - timeStart)+"ms");
}else{
$('body').append('Took more than 3 seconds');
}
}
function block() {
for (var i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {};
currentTime = new Date().getTime();
}
block();
block();
block();
var timeEnd = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Page was blocked(running importaint code :)) for:<br>' + (timeEnd - timeStart) + 'ms<br>');
If the 'important' code causes really significant lag, and precise timing is important, you can keep the precision by using two timeouts. The first timeout measures the lag and sets the second timeout accordingly.
Here's an example, using your code as a basis:
var timeStart = new Date().getTime();
var msDelay = 3000;
setTimeout(testLag, msDelay - 500);
function testLag() {
var timeTestLag = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('testLag() fired at: ' + (timeTestLag - timeStart) + 'ms<br/>');
setTimeout(test, timeStart + msDelay - timeTestLag);
}
function test() {
var timeAfter100MS = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Timeout Fired at: <br>' + (timeAfter100MS - timeStart) + 'ms<br> (should be ~3000, but it did not take the blocked time into account.)');
}
function block() {
for (var i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {};
}
block();
block();
block();
block();
block();
var timeEnd = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Page was blocked(running importaint code :)) for:<br>' + (timeEnd - timeStart) + 'ms<br>');
Note that the block is significantly more intensive than yours - I added a zero to your 100000000, and added a couple of extra block() calls. You might need to adjust the figures to get a sensible level of block for your own machine.
Based on Mauno's Answer I came up with a solution to temporarily "track the lag" using an interval. I am setting an interval with short intervals to capture the delay and set another timeout if necessary. Here is the working example: http://jsfiddle.net/me2loveit2/mCj2J/14/
It is approximate, but always walls within 100ms of the target which is good enough for me. It could be even more accurate if I increase the interval rate, but what I got is good enough for me.
I know using timeout & interval is not the best but sometimes the only way. I am just using them for a couple of seconds on page load and that's it.
Here is the code:
var timeStart = new Date().getTime();
var aditionalTimeout = 0;
var myTimeout;
setTimer(3000);
block();
block();
block();
var timeEnd = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Page was blocked(running importaint code :)) for:<br>' + (timeEnd - timeStart) + 'ms<br>');
function setTimer(milliseconds) {
//allow additional time to account for the huge lag the page has on load
recoverLagTime(milliseconds);
myTimeout = setTimeout(function () {
if (!aditionalTimeout) {
test();
} else {
if (aditionalTimeout >= milliseconds) {
test();
return;
}
setTimer(aditionalTimeout);
}
}, milliseconds);
}
function recoverLagTime(timeoutTime) {
aditionalTimeout = 0;
var interval = 50;
var counter = Math.ceil(timeoutTime / interval);
var startTime = new Date().getTime();
var intervalTime;
var lagInterval = setInterval(adjustTimer, interval);
function adjustTimer() {
if (counter <= 0 || aditionalTimeout < 0) {
clearInterval(lagInterval);
return;
}
counter--;
intervalTime = new Date().getTime();
var diff = (intervalTime - startTime);
if (diff > (interval + 5)) {
aditionalTimeout += (diff - interval);
}
startTime = new Date().getTime();
}
}
function test() {
aditionalTimeout = -100;//stop the check function
var timeAfter100MS = new Date().getTime();
$('body').append('Timeout Fired at: <br>' + (timeAfter100MS - timeStart) + 'ms<br> (should be ~3000 + ~amount blocked)');
}
function block() {
for (var i = 0; i < 100000000; i++) {};
}
I wrote a small (2-file) library for exactly these purposes : running heavy code whenever the CPU has idle time (using requestAnimationFrame) by splitting the code into smaller iterations so it doesn't block the whole application by allotting a specific percentage of CPU time to execution the code, and use the remainder to execute other scripts / update UI.
It functions similarly to other answers, but might be convenient to you as you can easily calculate elapsed time between executions, if you need to know these figures (or use it to leverage operations within your application, as that's what it was written for)
https://github.com/igorski/zThreader
this file
http://www.iguanademos.com/Jare/docs/html5/Lessons/Lesson2/js/GameLoopManager.js
taken from this site
Here is the code:
// ----------------------------------------
// GameLoopManager
// By Javier Arevalo
var GameLoopManager = new function() {
this.lastTime = 0;
this.gameTick = null;
this.prevElapsed = 0;
this.prevElapsed2 = 0;
I understand the declaration of variables,
and they are used to record the time between frames.
this.run = function(gameTick) {
var prevTick = this.gameTick;
this.gameTick = gameTick;
if (this.lastTime == 0)
{
// Once started, the loop never stops.
// But this function is called to change tick functions.
// Avoid requesting multiple frames per frame.
var bindThis = this;
requestAnimationFrame(function() { bindThis.tick(); } );
this.lastTime = 0;
}
}
I don't understand why he uses var bindThis = this
this.stop = function() {
this.run(null);
}
This function set's gameTick to null, breaking the loop in this.tick function.
this.tick = function () {
if (this.gameTick != null)
{
var bindThis = this;
requestAnimationFrame(function() { bindThis.tick(); } );
}
else
{
this.lastTime = 0;
return;
}
var timeNow = Date.now();
var elapsed = timeNow - this.lastTime;
if (elapsed > 0)
{
if (this.lastTime != 0)
{
if (elapsed > 1000) // Cap max elapsed time to 1 second to avoid death spiral
elapsed = 1000;
// Hackish fps smoothing
var smoothElapsed = (elapsed + this.prevElapsed + this.prevElapsed2)/3;
this.gameTick(0.001*smoothElapsed);
this.prevElapsed2 = this.prevElapsed;
this.prevElapsed = elapsed;
}
this.lastTime = timeNow;
}
}
}
Most of this code is what I don't understand, I can see he is recording the time elapsed between frames, but the rest of the code is lost to me.
On the website he uses the term singleton, which is used to prevent the program trying to update the same frame twice?
I have a bit of experience with the javascript syntax, but the concepts of singleton, and the general goal/function of this file is lost to me.
Why is the above code needed instead of just calling
requestAnimationFrame(function() {} );
The reason he uses bindThis is that he is passing a method into an anonymous function on the next line. If he merely used this.tick(), this would be defined as the context of requestAnimationFrame. He could achieve the same thing by using call or apply.
Singletons are classes that are only instantiated once. This is a matter of practice, and not a matter of syntax - javascript doesn't know what a singleton is. By calling it a "Singleton", he is merely communicating that this is a class that is instantiated only once, and everything that needs it will reference the same instance.