We Keep Coding

Prevent all of my contents of the page from resizing

I'm trying to prevent all of the content on the page from moving, resizing while width page is under 1350 px. Min-width doesn't work for this and i don't know why.. so what can i do ?
Btw on my css code, for the width, height, transformation: translate, i'm using the value vmax , and not px or %. So the min-width maybe doesn't work with it, all of my elements keep resizing because they are using vmax, so they just adapt there size with the window size too.. :(
I tried this too, but still don't work :(
body {
min-width: 1350px;
}
The code + preview
(I'm trying to stop resizing the three white rectangle in priority when my browser width is under 1350px, but if we can tell to the page to stop resize all of the content when she is under 1350px, and only use a scrollbar to deplace the elements on the page, it will be cool !)
See this page for exemple , when she is less than some px, the page stop from resizing and a scroll bar appear, i want the same result but i don't know how to do it ...

you are using css dimensions that are relative to the viewport. vmax vmin, vh, vw are relative to the viewport and thus react to resizing of the window. if you want fixed dimensions, you should use em or rem
edit: if you want to prevent the white boxes from resizing, you could add a min-width: 450px so they can grow but don't shrink beyond a point

vmax is not related to document size, but to actual browser size. Maybe absolute units like px, rem, em are a better solution in this case.

For contional css, based on the specific width of the window, you can use media-queries:
#media only screen and (max-width: 1350px) {
body {
background-color: lightblue;
}
}
That way, you'll be able to define sepcific rules for each resolution / rule that you want.

Trying to achieve some kind of scrollable container with dynamic height

I have <div> with some dynamic content inside - sometimes it is table, sometimes it is text. I'm trying to setup some kind of container which would be scrollable on y-axis if its contents are too big for the screen.
Some googling suggests that its simple to do if you hardcode height of the div, but what should I do if I want to avoid specifying exact pixel sizes anywhere?
From what I understand, I'll have to calculate remaining vertical visible screen space first, then set it as div height. This seems like a fairly common task, yet I can't find any components(don't care if they are jquery dependent or not) that would accomplish this.
Any suggestions? Already existing solution(plugin, library, etc) is preferred.

If you would like the container height to start scrolling when it matches the viewport height, you can just give it height or max-height equal to 100vh (100% viewport height).
In case there are other elements outside of the container and it shouldn't take the full screen height you can use calc() to limit it:
.container { max-height: calc(100vh - 100px); }

HTML div with absolute position tries to wrap the text. Can I avoid it, without using white space

I have a set of divs with position = absolute, and they can be positioned across the screen.
If the content of any div doesn't fit on the screen, the browser wraps the text into multiple lines and attempt to fit inside the window.
However, I dont want the browser to do that, It should instead hide the content.
http://jsbin.com/welcome/35835/edit/
Edit:
you may think of it as a div on a page with absolute positioning. and
1) the user can drag the div around
2) user can manually change the width of the div( there is a stretch box widget, which the user can use)..
So the problem is when the user is dragging the div around near the edges of the screen, the text should hide and not wrap if it goes out of the window. Hope this explains better
As shown in the example, block 2 shown is what I want.
So, lets say the width of the div is 100px, and the left position of the CSS style is (screen width - 50), then the rest of the text should hide.
Solution 1: white-space:nowrap. Cant use this, since this is a flexible width UI where user can change the width of the div if they want.
Solution 2: If I set the width of the div, explicitly to a number, it works fine.
But not a optimal solution, as then here I will always have to calculate the width for all divs at the time of rendering.
Is there a more optimal solution, which can make the browser not try to fit the text into the screen.

Hard to tell what you're asking. But I think you can use
{
height: 1.2em;
overflow: hidden;
}
To hide the content that is longer than the one line you support
http://jsfiddle.net/MXXDC/2/

If you put them all inside a huge (e.g. 5k px * 5k px absolute positioned div you should see the expected effect: http://jsbin.com/welcome/35862/edit

Is this what you want? (second item)
I wrapped the inner text in a very long div and applied overflow:hidden to it's parent.

I am not sure the exact use case of the widget so I am not 100% sure on what it can have and not have. I have an idea, maybe it will be useful - setting width to a % might help, something like this
.block2{
left: 50%;
top: 100px;
width: 100%;
}
you can set this in the css to avoid calculation with js, but like I said I am not sure of how this is used so this might not work but it might give you some ideas

Javascript mobile - calculate element dimensions in pixels based on screen dimensions

I want to calculate the dimensions of certain elements (img, ul, div, etc.) based on screen size. I can't to use percent values. I need pixel values. I also don't want to 'hardcode' everything using media queries and a new set of images for every resolution or screen size.
I thought about making this using screen size. I only need width calculation. So I add the initial width of my images and some initial space between them -> total width, and I then get scaling factor using: screenwidth / totalwidth
Now I scale all of my images and also the space between with this factor.
It's a very simple layout, only a few images and HTML elements. So this scaling should not be expensive.
It would work if the devices gave me reliable width measure for the screen. But depending of the device, I get a different meaning of this value. I'm using screen.width
In some cases screen.width is what the currently width is - in portrait it's a small value, in landscape a large one. But in other ones, width is always the same - the value which is defined as device's width.
So how do I scale my layout according to what's currently screen width in a consistent way with rotation, and without CSS % values? Is this an acceptable way to do layout scaling or am doing no-go?
Edit: I have to add more details after trying Jasper's solution. The images are used in a slider. The slider is basically an UL and each LI contains an image with float:left - so all the images are appended horizontally one after the other. With overflow hidden and stuff only the current slide is visible. Now, the official width of the UL is the sum of the width of all contained LIs. And this means, at least with my current state of knowledge, that I can't use percentage size for the LI elements, because if I did, this will be % of this total width of the UL, which is very large, and I end with immense LI elements/images.
Isn't there any reliable way to get current screen width for all devices ? I already have working code, I only need that the value of screen width is correct.
New update
Look here is a similar approach to what I'm trying to do:
http://ryangillespie.com/phonegap.php#/phonegap.php?
Entry of June 18, 2011 "One Screen Resolution to Rule Them All"
I tried also with exactly that example, copy pasting it in my code. But it doesn't work either. window.outerWidth has the same problems as I'm describing for screen.width (as well as JQuery $('body').width()). It works as long as the device isn't rotated - it initializes well. But at the first rotation, depending of the device, I get problems. In some it works as expected, in others it interchanges the values, so that I get large width in portrait mode and short in landscape, in others it gives fixed width and height all time, in others it doesn't rotate at all....

This is most likely accomplish-able with CSS alone (which is usually good for performance):
img {
width : 100%;
height : auto;
}
That will keep all the image's aspect ratios but re-size them to 100% width. Now that width is set based on the image's parent element(s) width. If you are using jQuery Mobile then the data-role="content" elements have a 15px padding, so to remove that you can just add a container to the image elements that removes the padding:
HTML --
<div class="remove-page-margins">
<img src="http://chachatelier.fr/programmation/images/mozodojo-mosaic-image.jpg" />
</div>
CSS --
.remove-page-margins {
margin : 0 -15px;
}​
And walaa, you've got responsive images without loads of code or overhead.
Here is a demo using a container and not using a container: http://jsfiddle.net/EVF4w/

Coincidentally I found that this works:
$(window).resize(function() {
updateScaling($('body').width());
});
This is always called and passes correct width. As far as I remember it also works with screen.width
In updateScaling I calculate a scalingFactor and adjust my elements.
I tried out responsive CSS, media queries and so on, but at some point it didn't make sense anymore, because I have anyways to recalculate the margin of slider's UL based on current slide and new width - and other stuff which needs script. So I made everything with script.
I removed window.onorientationchange.

Connecting repeatable and non-repeatble backgrounds without a seam

I have a 700x300 background repeating seamlessly inside of the main content-div. Now I'd like to attach a div at the bottom of the content-div, containing a different background image that isn't repeatable, connecting seamlessly with the repeatable background above it. Essentially, the non-repeatable image will look like the end piece of the repeatable image.
Due to the nature of the pattern, unless the full 300px height of the background image is visible in the last repeat of the content-div's backround, the background in the div below won't seamlessly connect. Basically, I need the content div's height to be a multiple of 300px under all circumstances. What's a good approach to this sort of problem?
I've tried resizing the content-div on loading the page, but this only works as long as the content div doesn't contain any resizing, dynamic content, which is not my case:
function adjustContentHeight()
{
// Setting content div's height to nearest upper multiple of column backgrounds height,
// forcing it not to be cut-off when repeated.
var contentBgHeight = 300;
var contentHeight = $("#content").height();
var adjustedHeight = Math.ceil(contentHeight / contentBgHeight);
$("#content").height(adjustedHeight * contentBgHeight);
}
$(document).ready(adjustContentHeight);
What I'm looking for there is a way to respond to a div resizing event, but there doesn't seem to be such a thing. Also, please assume I have no access to the JS controlling the resizing of content in the content-div, though this is potentially a way of solving the problem.
Another potential solution I was thinking off was to offset the background image in the bottom div by a certain amount depending on the height of the content-div. Again, the missing piece seems to be the ability to respond to a resize event.

Another approach is to calculate the background-position style for the bottom and top DIVs based on the size of the content DIV. You can use negative positions to align the bottom of one to the top of another.
Yet another approach is to use a layered DIV approach in which the top, content and bottom are all children of a parent DIV that contains the background.
The benefit of these approaches is that it doesn't change the natural rendering of the content DIV simply for managing the background.
Example: http://bin.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/css/repeating-bg-content.html

Could setting background-position: fixed in your css help? Then your bottom div could move, but its background image would remain fixed in relation to the top of the page. As more of your repeating image was revealed, so more of your bottom image would be hidden.
This would comes under the heading of "offset the background image in the bottom div by a certain amount depending on the height of the content-div", rather than "the content div's height to be a multiple of 300px under all circumstances".

You could try adding an event listener to the div:
var div = document.getElementById("content");
div.addEventListener("resize", adjustContentHeight, false);

If nothing needs to match up at the top, position the repeating image at the bottom of the div (so the overflow will spill over the top). Like this:
div#repeating { background: transparent url('/path/to/image') repeat left bottom; }