Might be a silly question but I couldn't figure the solution out myself or google it. I'm using a button for click+upload files. However, I also want to add the drag+drop functionality the same time - using preferably the same flow object and function. Here's my current code:
<div flow-init flow-name="uploader.flow" flow-files-submitted="uploadFiles()"
flow-file-success="fileUploaded()">
<label for="file-upload" class="upload">Files</label>
<input id="file-upload" type="file" flow-btn>
So I'd like to use the 'uploader.flow' scope for my drag and drop too executing 'uploadFiles()' with it on submit. Here's what I've been trying:
<div flow-init flow-object="...??..." flow-drop
flow-files-submitted="uploadFiles()" flow-file-success="fileUploaded()" ></div>
I believe myself the issue is only that I can't figure out what to put in flow-object. But I doubt it was that simple. Might be something also with the new init? Should it be done or not.
Another way around of course could be to find the first shared parent element and init it there instead for both the same time? But would this be a bit too vague?
So in the end I did what I didn't originally want to do. I went up the parent elements until I found a common one the both were children of and did the initialization for ng-flow there instead.
It works.
Related
I am looking to create a chart that generates a series of rows. Each row contains various buttons and text boxes. The row in question is this. Yes, I am using a bunch of divs instead of a list. No, I'm not going to change it at this time as I'm strictly hacking this stuff together so it works, not so it's semantically usable. This is an internal tool, intended for internal use only, and doesn't need to be perfectly semantic, nor does it need to be used by screen readers. I've also removed irrelevant information/names/labels/classes.
<div class="row">
<div class="rcColumn">
<button></button>
</div>
<div class="accColumn">
<input></input>
<button>Copy</button>
</div>
<div class="dollarColumn">
<input></input>
<button>Copy</button>
</div>
<div class="toolbar">
<button>Clear</button>
<button id="deleteLineButton" onclick="deleteLine();" title="Delete this line">X</button>
</div>
</div>
Yes, I'm aware it's not really good to use onclick in the HTML tags, but I am because again, whipping this up quick. I slowly make things more and more clean over time but for now I'm making it work. Don't kill me over it.
That said, the function I made is as follows:
function deleteLine() {
$("#deleteLineButton").parent().parent().remove();
}
Now, there are functions I created that make a new line, effective adding that HTML exactly underneath. It works fine. However, while deleteLine() appropriately deletes the topmost div in the HTML example, it always goes for the topmost line, no matter how many new lines I make.
I tried making an alternate version like so:
function deleteLine() {
$(this).parent().parent().remove();
}
But that doesn't work either. I also tried using "this" instead (with quotes), but still no dice. The delete line button no longer works, and I get no error in the console.
I don't want to use IDs or Classes because I might make an arbitrary amount of lines. How can I better select the appropriate row? Was I on the right track using 'this'?
Change the button id to a class since ids must be unique
<button class="deleteLineButton" title="Delete this line">X</button>
Then rather than using outdated inline onclick you can add a jQuery event listener that traverses to closest('.row') which is more understandable to read than chaining parent().parent()
$('.deleteLineButton').on('click', function(){
$(this).closest('.row').remove()
})
I am reworking an old app of mine and I am having issues with dom manipulation and basic selections within a vue instance.
Essentially I have information in a database that I load in via ajax.
Each record in the db has 2 sections. The header tab(title, time, date etc) and the body of the record(notes, ideas, etc)
When loaded, the header shows normally to the user but if they want to see what that note contains, they have to click on the header for the bottom to appear.
consider the following html:
<vuejs for loop>
<div v-bind:id='item._id' class="tabW" v-on:click="blueTabClick" >
<div class="blueTabMainColor">
<!-- header stuff here -->
</div>
<div class="notesOpenedW">
<!-- interior informaton here, HIDDEN BY CSS -->
</div>
</div>
<vuejs for loop ender>
This HTML is essentially inside a Vue for/loop directive, and generates however many "tabs(tabW)" as needed based on how much info I have in the DB
All I want the user to do is to be able to click whichever tab(tabW) they want information on, and for the notes show underneath(notesOpenedW).
I stripped my entire app and js and tried to keep it as simple a test as possible and even with the below, I still can't get anything.
here is my JS(JQ):
$(document).ready(function(evt){
$(".blueTabMainColor").click(function(){
$(this).next(".notesOpenedW").fadeToggle();
});
});
With this basic code, when I put it inside a Vue instance, via:
methods: {
blueTabClick: function (evt) {
evt.preventDefault();
$(".blueTabMainColor").click(function(){
//alert("you clicked me");
$(this).next(".notesOpenedW").fadeToggle();
});
}
}
It doesn't work, but if I take it out of the Vue instance, it works just fine.
how can I get this to work? or am I going about it the wrong way?
Vue will not cohabit happily with JQuery. You're $(this) will not work because you're not even in the document at that point, you're in pure js, virtual DOM, another universe. Then, if it did, the event listener you call may not exist. You will need to fundamentally transition this code to Vue if you want it to work, I fear.
You can achieve this by setting a ref on "notesOpenedW".
https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/api/#ref
I would strongly recommend to wrap this behaviour in a dedicated component
That would have the following content :
<div class="tabW" v-on:click="blueTabClick" >
<div class="blueTabMainColor">
<!-- header stuff here -->
</div>
<div class="notesOpenedW" ref="notesToggleDiv">
<!-- interior informaton here, HIDDEN BY CSS -->
</div>
</div>
And the method :
methods: {
blueTabClick: function () {
$(this.$refs.notesToggleDiv).fadeToggle();
}
}
Be aware that when using Vue, manipulating directly the dom is usually a bad idea.
As i showed you, it is possible to use jQuery with Vue if you absolutely need it (or cannot afford to rework more deeply your application).
Edit : Just found this article that i think would help you a lot :
https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/02/jquery-vue-javascript/?utm_campaign=Revue%20newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Vue.js%20Developers
I have been trying to use transclusion to create a directive which makes two copies of it's contents and appends them inside the original template. I have failed in my attempts to modify the two copies before they slotted back into the DOM and I think it's because I have misunderstood how transclusion works.
I have another question here which I don't think is going to be answered because I think the premise may be wrong.
Transclude function needs to modify clone properly
I need to take a new approach to this and I was wondering if it would be sensible to ditch transclusion and get my hands dirty inside a compile function.
My new question is, can you take the contents of "elem", make a couple of copies of it using JQlite then compile them manually against the directive's parent scope and add them back into the original template?
So, if my toolbar directive is used like this, where the contents of the toolbar tag can be any HTML the user wants...
<div ng-controller="myController">
<toolbar>
<form name="formName" submit="myController.submit()">
<div>
... some controls...
</div>
</form>
</toolbar>
</div>
And the template for the directive is this....
<toolbar-inner>
<div class="toolbar">
<div transclude-main></div>
</div>
<div class="overflow">
<div transclude-overflow></div>
</div>
</toolbar-inner>
My compile function of the toolbar directive needs to take a copy of the contents of the element, clone it, rename any forms so that we don't have duplicate form names then compile one copy against the parent controller and slot it into the main slot then do the same with a second copy and slot it into the overflow slot.
The key things is that at the end of it I should have a single directive with two copies of it's contents and my controller should have two forms on it - myController.formName and myController.formName2
Please let me know if I haven't explained something correctly here. I'm pretty sure the solution here should not involve transclusion, hence posting the second question. It is not a duplicate.
If I can explain anything in further detail please ask.
Many thanks.
EDIT:
I have tried to do this in the following Plunkr
https://plnkr.co/edit/eUIdaPiOIISDdXGLBTKJ?p=preview
I have a few problems with this:
A) I am getting a JS error in the console - TypeError: Cannot read property 'childNodes' of undefined
B) I was assuming I could just mess with the template in the pre-compile phase and replace the contents of the directive with new HTML consisting of a new template merged with two copies of the original contents. I can see though that I have to compile them against the $parent scope because my directive uses an isolate scope (although not strictly necessary in this cut down example)
C) I get another error when replacing the original contents of the directive element anyway.
I think I am half way there and hopefully this plunk shows what I an prying to achieve, but i have run out of knowledge.
For completeness, here is the plunk where I tried to do it with transclusion, which didn't work because the transcluded contents are already compiled by the time I started messing with them in the transclude function.
https://plnkr.co/edit/XE7REjJRShw43cpfJCh2?p=preview
You can see the full conversation about this in my previous question:
Transclude function needs to modify clone properly
I got your transcluded example working. See here.
I had to call the below to get it working.
$compile(clone)(scope.$parent);
For the ngTransclude:orphan problem, in this version by compiling just the form elements it works when the child transclude is outside of the form.
This plunker was prior to Angular 1.5 which introduce Tranclusion.
link: function(scope, element) {
if (!element.find('ng-transclude').children().length) {
element.find('button').append('<b style="color: red">Button1</b>');
}
}
Plunker
I'm trying to automate clicking a few links on a webpage
For example, in Google Chrome if I type Javascript:setDisplayType('source'); then it runs the function in the html defined as
<input type="radio" name="DisplayType" value="source"
onclick="setDisplayType('source');">
So far so good. However, I'm unsure about how to do the same with the following
<td id="4124321351_U923" class="o bgc b" onclick="s(this,'329803656','40745906','9/2');b(this,'5.5','5.5');">5.5</td>
I've tried the following without success
Javascript:s(this,'329803656','40745906','9/2');
Javascript:b(this,'5.5','5.5');
Javascript:s(this,'329803656','40745906','9/2');b(this,'5.5','5.5');
Please can someone explain why it's not working and how to fire this onclick event using a similar method?
if you're not using JQuery or similar, then something like:
document.getElementById("4124321351_U923").click();
might work. In short, your examples above don't work because the 'this' magic variable needs to be initialised to point to the link being clicked. You could either try to initiate a click event on the element (as per my example) or you could manually grab a reference to the link, and pass that in instead of this
Problem is with this argument because it's not called from the element and you called it outside.
Javascript:s(this,'329803656','40745906','9/2');
Try proving a proper argument like this,
Javascript:s(document.getElementById('4124321351_U923'),'329803656','40745906','9/2');
I've got an form with the ability to have an infinite number of user-added inputs.
As an example, imagine a job application with an "add references" section. There's a "+" button, as well as an "Remove" next to any already added reference.
Here's an example template
<script type="text/template" id="referenceTmpl">
<div>
<h2>Reference No. <%= index %></h2><a id="removeRef<%= index %>">Remove</a>
Name: <input type="text" name="references[<%= index %>].name" />
Email: <input type="text" name="references[<%= index %>].email" />
(...)
</div>
</script>
When any "reference" is removed, I'd like to renumber the others. As the form inputs may already contain unsaved data, I need to do so without fully re-rendering the template. I'd like to do this in a salable way (one that doesn't require too much extra code per input) as the solution may be used in a more complex application.
Feel free to assume I'm using jQuery if the solution could benefit from it.
Any ideas?
The best way to do this kind of thing without hacking into the code, is to use a model(list) for your so called "references".
You should try Backbone.js in combination with Underscore.js:
Backbone.js documentation
There is an TODO example application that does exactly what you want:
Application code-breakdown
Example application
It might take some time to set up, but when you are finished, you will get work done much quicker.