How can I access $scope data from view to my factory in angularjs? I can access $scope.items from my controller, but when I need to use it in my factory to use the data and generate a pdf I cannot access it.
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('myCtrl', function($scope, $http, testFactory) {
$scope.link = "http://localhost:3450/loading.html";
testFactory.all().then(
function(res){
$scope.link = res;
},
function(err){
console.log(err);
}
);
})
.factory('testFactory', function($q){
var pdfInfo = {
content: [
//data should be here...
]
};
var link = {};
function _all(){
var d = $q.defer();
pdfMake.createPdf(pdfInfo).getDataUrl(function(outputDoc){
d.resolve(outputDoc);
});
return d.promise;
}
link.all = _all;
return link;
});
I used factory when I click the generate button from my view, it will wait until the pdf is generated. Coz when I did not do it this way before, I need to click the button twice just to get the pdf generated.
You can just pass the data to your factory as a
function parameter.
angular.module('myApp', [])
.controller('myCtrl', function($scope, $http, testFactory) {
var pdfInfo = {
content: $scope.items
};
$scope.link = "http://localhost:3450/loading.html";
testFactory.all(pdfInfo).then(
function(res) {
$scope.link = res;
},
function(err) {
console.log(err);
}
);
})
.factory('testFactory', function($q) {
var link = {};
function _all(pdfInfo) {
var d = $q.defer();
pdfMake.createPdf(pdfInfo).getDataUrl(function(outputDoc) {
d.resolve(outputDoc);
});
return d.promise;
}
link.all = _all;
return link;
});
I did it. I forgot to send the $scope.items to my factory. So what i did is I added testFactory.all($scope.items) in my controller instead of just plain testFactory.all().
Then in my factory,
I used function _all(value), so I can used the values passed by the views through controller. I am not sure if this is the proper way, but it works. Please suggest good practice if you have.
It is a bad practice to move around $scope to other services, as they may change it and effect your controller logic. It will make a coupling between controllers to other services.
If your factory requires data from the controller, it is better to just pass those parameters to the factory's function.
EDIT: I see you managed to do that, and yes - passing $scope.items is the preferred way (and not, for example, passing $scope).
I have three controllers that are quite similar. I want to have a controller which these three extend and share its functions.
Perhaps you don't extend a controller but it is possible to extend a controller or make a single controller a mixin of multiple controllers.
module.controller('CtrlImplAdvanced', ['$scope', '$controller', function ($scope, $controller) {
// Initialize the super class and extend it.
angular.extend(this, $controller('CtrlImpl', {$scope: $scope}));
… Additional extensions to create a mixin.
}]);
When the parent controller is created the logic contained within it is also executed.
See $controller() for for more information about but only the $scope value needs to be passed. All other values will be injected normally.
#mwarren, your concern is taken care of auto-magically by Angular dependency injection. All you need is to inject $scope, although you could override the other injected values if desired.
Take the following example:
(function(angular) {
var module = angular.module('stackoverflow.example',[]);
module.controller('simpleController', function($scope, $document) {
this.getOrigin = function() {
return $document[0].location.origin;
};
});
module.controller('complexController', function($scope, $controller) {
angular.extend(this, $controller('simpleController', {$scope: $scope}));
});
})(angular);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.3.15/angular.js"></script>
<div ng-app="stackoverflow.example">
<div ng-controller="complexController as C">
<span><b>Origin from Controller:</b> {{C.getOrigin()}}</span>
</div>
</div>
Although $document is not passed into 'simpleController' when it is created by 'complexController' $document is injected for us.
For inheritance you can use standard JavaScript inheritance patterns.
Here is a demo which uses $injector
function Parent($scope) {
$scope.name = 'Human';
$scope.clickParent = function() {
$scope.name = 'Clicked from base controller';
}
}
function Child($scope, $injector) {
$injector.invoke(Parent, this, {$scope: $scope});
$scope.name = 'Human Child';
$scope.clickChild = function(){
$scope.clickParent();
}
}
Child.prototype = Object.create(Parent.prototype);
In case you use the controllerAs syntax (which I highly recommend), it is even easier to use the classical inheritance pattern:
function BaseCtrl() {
this.name = 'foobar';
}
BaseCtrl.prototype.parentMethod = function () {
//body
};
function ChildCtrl() {
BaseCtrl.call(this);
this.name = 'baz';
}
ChildCtrl.prototype = Object.create(BaseCtrl.prototype);
ChildCtrl.prototype.childMethod = function () {
this.parentMethod();
//body
};
app.controller('BaseCtrl', BaseCtrl);
app.controller('ChildCtrl', ChildCtrl);
Another way could be to create just "abstract" constructor function which will be your base controller:
function BaseController() {
this.click = function () {
//some actions here
};
}
module.controller('ChildCtrl', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
BaseController.call($scope);
$scope.anotherClick = function () {
//other actions
};
}]);
Blog post on this topic
Well, I'm not exactly sure what you want to achieve, but usually Services are the way to go.
You can also use the Scope inheritance characteristics of Angular to share code between controllers:
<body ng-controller="ParentCtrl">
<div ng-controller="FirstChildCtrl"></div>
<div ng-controller="SecondChildCtrl"></div>
</body>
function ParentCtrl($scope) {
$scope.fx = function() {
alert("Hello World");
});
}
function FirstChildCtrl($scope) {
// $scope.fx() is available here
}
function SecondChildCtrl($scope) {
// $scope.fx() is available here
}
You don't extend controllers. If they perform the same basic functions then those functions need to be moved to a service. That service can be injected into your controllers.
Yet another good solution taken from this article:
// base controller containing common functions for add/edit controllers
module.controller('Diary.BaseAddEditController', function ($scope, SomeService) {
$scope.diaryEntry = {};
$scope.saveDiaryEntry = function () {
SomeService.SaveDiaryEntry($scope.diaryEntry);
};
// add any other shared functionality here.
}])
module.controller('Diary.AddDiaryController', function ($scope, $controller) {
// instantiate base controller
$controller('Diary.BaseAddEditController', { $scope: $scope });
}])
module.controller('Diary.EditDiaryController', function ($scope, $routeParams, DiaryService, $controller) {
// instantiate base controller
$controller('Diary.BaseAddEditController', { $scope: $scope });
DiaryService.GetDiaryEntry($routeParams.id).success(function (data) {
$scope.diaryEntry = data;
});
}]);
You can create a service and inherit its behaviour in any controller just by injecting it.
app.service("reusableCode", function() {
var reusableCode = {};
reusableCode.commonMethod = function() {
alert('Hello, World!');
};
return reusableCode;
});
Then in your controller that you want to extend from the above reusableCode service:
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope, reusableCode) {
angular.extend($scope, reusableCode);
// now you can access all the properties of reusableCode in this $scope
$scope.commonMethod()
});
DEMO PLUNKER: http://plnkr.co/edit/EQtj6I0X08xprE8D0n5b?p=preview
You can try something like this (have not tested):
function baseController(callback){
return function($scope){
$scope.baseMethod = function(){
console.log('base method');
}
callback.apply(this, arguments);
}
}
app.controller('childController', baseController(function(){
}));
You can extend with a services, factories or providers. they are the same but with different degree of flexibility.
here an example using factory : http://jsfiddle.net/aaaflyvw/6KVtj/2/
angular.module('myApp',[])
.factory('myFactory', function() {
var myFactory = {
save: function () {
// saving ...
},
store: function () {
// storing ...
}
};
return myFactory;
})
.controller('myController', function($scope, myFactory) {
$scope.myFactory = myFactory;
myFactory.save(); // here you can use the save function
});
And here you can use the store function also:
<div ng-controller="myController">
<input ng-blur="myFactory.store()" />
</div>
You can directly use $controller('ParentController', {$scope:$scope})
Example
module.controller('Parent', ['$scope', function ($scope) {
//code
}])
module.controller('CtrlImplAdvanced', ['$scope', '$controller', function ($scope, $controller) {
//extend parent controller
$controller('CtrlImpl', {$scope: $scope});
}]);
You can use Angular "as" syntax combined with plain JavaScript inheritance
See more details here
http://blogs.microsoft.co.il/oric/2015/01/01/base-controller-angularjs/
I wrote a function to do this:
function extendController(baseController, extension) {
return [
'$scope', '$injector',
function($scope, $injector) {
$injector.invoke(baseController, this, { $scope: $scope });
$injector.invoke(extension, this, { $scope: $scope });
}
]
}
You can use it like this:
function() {
var BaseController = [
'$scope', '$http', // etc.
function($scope, $http, // etc.
$scope.myFunction = function() {
//
}
// etc.
}
];
app.controller('myController',
extendController(BaseController,
['$scope', '$filter', // etc.
function($scope, $filter /* etc. */)
$scope.myOtherFunction = function() {
//
}
// etc.
}]
)
);
}();
Pros:
You don't have to register the base controller.
None of the controllers need to know about the $controller or $injector services.
It works well with angular's array injection syntax - which is essential if your javascript is going to be minified.
You can easily add extra injectable services to the base controller, without also having to remember to add them to, and pass them through from, all of your child controllers.
Cons:
The base controller has to be defined as a variable, which risks polluting the global scope. I've avoided this in my usage example by wrapping everything in an anonymous self-executing function, but this does mean that all of the child controllers have to be declared in the same file.
This pattern works well for controllers which are instantiated directly from your html, but isn't so good for controllers that you create from your code via the $controller() service, because it's dependence on the injector prevents you from directly injecting extra, non-service parameters from your calling code.
I consider extending controllers as bad-practice. Rather put your shared logic into a service. Extended objects in javascript tend to get rather complex. If you want to use inheritance, I would recommend typescript. Still, thin controllers are better way to go in my point of view.
I am trying to define a generic route which will handle most of request. Adding a route for each and every feature addition is what I feel not good and not maintainable.
So my target is to write a generic route and resolve the decencies dynamically, which include resolving all dependent controller & service files, resolving templateUrl and resolving controller name. I can resolve/construct everything except controller name. Please help me a way around
My route with a custom resolver:
$routeProvider
.when('/:module/:controller/:action?', routeResolver.resolve())
Inside my custom resolver:
function routeResolverProvider(){
this.$get= function(){
return this;
}
this.resolve = function (options) {
var route = {};
route.templateUrl = function (params) {
var path = String.format('/app/components/{0}/{1}.view.html', params.module, params.controller);
return path;
};
//================================================================================
route.controller='THIS IS WHAT I WANT TO CONSTRUCT FROM ROUTE as templateUrl'
//================================================================================
route.resolve = {
loadDependencies: ['$q', '$rootScope', '$route', function ($q, $rootScope, $route) {
// MY RESOLVE LOGIC HERE
// I construct dependent file path from route values
// String.format('/app/components/{0}/{1}.controller.js', params.module, params.controller);
}]
};
return route;
}}
app.provider('routeResolver', routeResolverProvider)
Some good articles:
https://github.com/angular/angular.js/wiki/Understanding-Dependency-Injection
https://medium.com/opinionated-angularjs/advanced-routing-and-resolves-a2fcbf874a1c
If I understand your question correctly, then you want to be able to instantiate a controller by name.
This is possible in AngularJS as explained under Testing Controllers.
You have to use the $controller service like this:
$scope = $rootScope.$new();
$controller('NamedController', {$scope: $scope});
Here is a working plunker: http://plnkr.co/edit/AVCEdLS9zhIzCyZgcXZF?p=preview
Thanks a lot Dan, I was looking exactly for this kind also. So I modify my resolver as and finally its bingo.
this.$get = ['$rootScope', '$scope', '$route', '$controller', function () {
return this;
}];
route.controller = function ($rootScope, $scope, $route, $controller) {
var params = $route.current.params;
$controller(params.controller.toLowerCase() + 'Controller', {$scope: $scope});
}
Finally I solved my issue but would like to discuss the possible disadvantages of this approach.
I use the following factory to fetch data from API and store it to local variable called apiData.
app.factory('MyFactory', function($resource, $q) {
var apiData = [];
var service = {};
var resource = $resource('http://example.com/api/sampledata/');
service.getApiData=function() {
var itemsDefer=$q.defer();
if(apiData.length >0) {
itemsDefer.resolve(apiData);
}
else
{
resource.query({},function(data) {
apiData=data;
itemsDefer.resolve(data)
});
}
return itemsDefer.promise;
};
service.add=function(newItem){
if(apiData.length > 0){
apiData.push(newItem);
}
};
service.remove=function(itemToRemove){
if(apiData.length > 0){
apiData.splice(apiData.indexOf(itemToRemove), 1);
}
};
return service;
});
I inject the apiData into my controllers the following way:
$routeProvider
.when('/myview', {
templateUrl: 'views/myview.html',
controller: 'MyController',
resolve: {
queryset: function(MyFactory){
return MyFactory.getApiData();
}
}
})
app.controller('MyController', ['$scope', 'queryset',
function ($scope, queryset) {
$scope.queryset = queryset;
}
]);
Is it a good way to share a promise between different controllers or I better to use local storage or even cacheFactory?
How can I rewrite MyFactory add() and remove() methods so that I can keep my shared variable in a current state (no API update/create/delete calls needed)?
Thank you!
You should use $resource to get $promise eg: resource.query().$promise instead of $q.defer() for cleaner code. Otherwise you are good to go. You could use $cacheFactory, but you can also use local var.
Isn't your shared variable in a current state with current code?
I recommend you take a look at ui-router and its nested and abstract views, where resolved values are available to child controllers.
I have the worlds simplest controller which i want access to $scope but it is "undefined" and I cannot, for the life of me work out why, however all the functions are called corectly, the DataService, etc is working perfectly, just i have no access to $scope?!
controller code is below
app = angular.module("windscreens", []);
app.controller('DamageCtrl', function($scope, DataService) {
$scope.setDamageLocation = function(location) {
DataService.getDamage().setLocation(location);
};
$scope.isLocation = function(requiredLocation) {
return DataService.getDamage().getLocation() === requiredLocation;
};
$scope.progress = function() {
};
});
To access a property on the scope from your HTML template you only need to use the property name, you don't need to write $scope with it.
Example:
<button ng-click="progress()"></button>
In your javascript you will only have access to the $scope inside the controller and its functions. If you call an external resource, for example: DataService module, it won't have access to the $scope unless you pass it as an argument explicitly.
I managed to get it working using the alternative syntax. As detailed below, still not sure why it wasn't working but hey hum
app.controller('DamageCtrl', ['$scope', 'DataService',
function($scope, DataService) {
$scope.setDamageLocation = function(location) {
DataService.getDamage().setLocation(location);
};
$scope.isLocation = function(requiredLocation) {
return DataService.getDamage().getLocation() === requiredLocation;
};
$scope.progress = function() {
console.log($scope);
};
}
]);