How do you get the rendered height of an element?
Let's say you have a <div> element with some content inside. This content inside is going to stretch the height of the <div>. How do you get the "rendered" height when you haven't explicitly set the height. Obviously, I tried:
var h = document.getElementById('someDiv').style.height;
Is there a trick for doing this? I am using jQuery if that helps.
Try one of:
var h = document.getElementById('someDiv').clientHeight;
var h = document.getElementById('someDiv').offsetHeight;
var h = document.getElementById('someDiv').scrollHeight;
clientHeight includes the height and vertical padding.
offsetHeight includes the height, vertical padding, and vertical borders.
scrollHeight includes the height of the contained document (would be greater than just height in case of scrolling), vertical padding, and vertical borders.
It should just be
$('#someDiv').height();
with jQuery. This retrieves the height of the first item in the wrapped set as a number.
Trying to use
.style.height
only works if you have set the property in the first place. Not very useful!
NON JQUERY since there were a bunch of links using elem.style.height in the top of these answers...
INNER HEIGHT:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element.clientHeight
document.getElementById(id_attribute_value).clientHeight;
OUTER HEIGHT:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/HTMLElement.offsetHeight
document.getElementById(id_attribute_value).offsetHeight;
Or one of my favorite references: http://youmightnotneedjquery.com/
I use this to get the height of an element (returns float):
document.getElementById('someDiv').getBoundingClientRect().height
It also works when you use the virtual DOM. I use it in Vue like this:
this.$refs['some-ref'].getBoundingClientRect().height
For a Vue component:
this.$refs['some-ref'].$el.getBoundingClientRect().height
You can use .outerHeight() for this purpose.
It will give you full rendered height of the element. Also, you don't need to set any css-height of the element. For precaution you can keep its height auto so it can be rendered as per content's height.
//if you need height of div excluding margin/padding/border
$('#someDiv').height();
//if you need height of div with padding but without border + margin
$('#someDiv').innerHeight();
// if you need height of div including padding and border
$('#someDiv').outerHeight();
//and at last for including border + margin + padding, can use
$('#someDiv').outerHeight(true);
For a clear view of these function you can go for jQuery's site or a detailed post here.
it will clear the difference between .height() / innerHeight() / outerHeight()
style = window.getComputedStyle(your_element);
then simply: style.height
Definitely use
$('#someDiv').height() // to read it
or
$('#someDiv').height(newHeight) // to set it
I'm posting this as an additional answer because theres a couple important things I just learnt.
I almost fell into the trap just now of using offsetHeight. This is what happened :
I used the good old trick of using a debugger to 'watch' what properties my element has
I saw which one has a value around the value I was expecting
It was offsetHeight - so I used that.
Then i realized it didnt work with a hidden DIV
I tried hiding after calculating maxHeight but that looked clumsy - got in a mess.
I did a search - discovered jQuery.height() - and used it
found out height() works even on hidden elements
just for fun I checked the jQuery implementation of height/width
Here's just a portion of it :
Math.max(
Math.max(document.body["scroll" + name], document.documentElement["scroll" + name]),
Math.max(document.body["offset" + name], document.documentElement["offset" + name])
)
Yup it looks at BOTH scroll and offset. If that fails it looks even further, taking into account browser and css compatibility issues. In other words STUFF I DONT CARE ABOUT - or want to.
But I dont have to. Thanks jQuery!
Moral of the story : if jQuery has a method for something its probably for a good reason, likely related to compatibilty.
If you haven't read through the jQuery list of methods recently I suggest you take a look.
I think the best way to do this in 2020 is to use vanilla js and getBoundingClientRect().height;
Here's an example
let div = document.querySelector('div');
let divHeight = div.getBoundingClientRect().height;
console.log(`Div Height: ${divHeight}`);
<div>
How high am I? 🥴
</div>
On top of getting height this way, we also have access to a bunch of other stuff about the div.
let div = document.querySelector('div');
let divInfo = div.getBoundingClientRect();
console.log(divInfo);
<div>What else am I? 🥴</div>
I made a simple code that doesn't even need JQuery and probably gonna help some people.
It gets the total height of 'ID1' after loaded and use it on 'ID2'
function anyName(){
var varname=document.getElementById('ID1').offsetHeight;
document.getElementById('ID2').style.height=varname+'px';
}
Then just set the body to load it
<body onload='anyName()'>
document.querySelector('.project_list_div').offsetHeight;
Hm we can get the Element geometry...
var geometry;
geometry={};
var element=document.getElementById(#ibims);
var rect = element.getBoundingClientRect();
this.geometry.top=rect.top;
this.geometry.right=rect.right;
this.geometry.bottom=rect.bottom;
this.geometry.left=rect.left;
this.geometry.height=this.geometry.bottom-this.geometry.top;
this.geometry.width=this.geometry.right-this.geometry.left;
console.log(this.geometry);
How about this plain JS ?
So is this the answer?
"If you need to calculate something but not show it, set the element to visibility:hidden and position:absolute, add it to the DOM tree, get the offsetHeight, and remove it. (That's what the prototype library does behind the lines last time I checked)."
I have the same problem on a number of elements. There is no jQuery or Prototype to be used on the site but I'm all in favor of borrowing the technique if it works. As an example of some things that failed to work, followed by what did, I have the following code:
// Layout Height Get
function fnElementHeightMaxGet(DoScroll, DoBase, elementPassed, elementHeightDefault)
{
var DoOffset = true;
if (!elementPassed) { return 0; }
if (!elementPassed.style) { return 0; }
var thisHeight = 0;
var heightBase = parseInt(elementPassed.style.height);
var heightOffset = parseInt(elementPassed.offsetHeight);
var heightScroll = parseInt(elementPassed.scrollHeight);
var heightClient = parseInt(elementPassed.clientHeight);
var heightNode = 0;
var heightRects = 0;
//
if (DoBase) {
if (heightBase > thisHeight) { thisHeight = heightBase; }
}
if (DoOffset) {
if (heightOffset > thisHeight) { thisHeight = heightOffset; }
}
if (DoScroll) {
if (heightScroll > thisHeight) { thisHeight = heightScroll; }
}
//
if (thisHeight == 0) { thisHeight = heightClient; }
//
if (thisHeight == 0) {
// Dom Add:
// all else failed so use the protype approach...
var elBodyTempContainer = document.getElementById('BodyTempContainer');
elBodyTempContainer.appendChild(elementPassed);
heightNode = elBodyTempContainer.childNodes[0].offsetHeight;
elBodyTempContainer.removeChild(elementPassed);
if (heightNode > thisHeight) { thisHeight = heightNode; }
//
// Bounding Rect:
// Or this approach...
var clientRects = elementPassed.getClientRects();
heightRects = clientRects.height;
if (heightRects > thisHeight) { thisHeight = heightRects; }
}
//
// Default height not appropriate here
// if (thisHeight == 0) { thisHeight = elementHeightDefault; }
if (thisHeight > 3000) {
// ERROR
thisHeight = 3000;
}
return thisHeight;
}
which basically tries anything and everything only to get a zero result. ClientHeight with no affect. With the problem elements I typically get NaN in the Base and zero in the Offset and Scroll heights. I then tried the Add DOM solution and clientRects to see if it works here.
29 Jun 2011,
I did indeed update the code to try both adding to DOM and clientHeight with better results than I expected.
1) clientHeight was also 0.
2) Dom actually gave me a height which was great.
3) ClientRects returns a result almost identical to the DOM technique.
Because the elements added are fluid in nature, when they are added to an otherwise empty DOM Temp element they are rendered according to the width of that container. This get weird, because that is 30px shorter than it eventually ends up.
I added a few snapshots to illustrate how the height is calculated differently.
The height differences are obvious. I could certainly add absolute positioning and hidden but I am sure that will have no effect. I continued to be convinced this would not work!
(I digress further) The height comes out (renders) lower than the true rendered height. This could be addressed by setting the width of the DOM Temp element to match the existing parent and could be done fairly accurately in theory. I also do not know what would result from removing them and adding them back into their existing location. As they arrived through an innerHTML technique I will be looking using this different approach.
* HOWEVER * None of that was necessary. In fact it worked as advertised and returned the correct height!!!
When I was able to get the menus visible again amazingly DOM had returned the correct height per the fluid layout at the top of the page (279px). The above code also uses getClientRects which return 280px.
This is illustrated in the following snapshot (taken from Chrome once working.)
Now I have noooooo idea why that prototype trick works, but it seems to. Alternatively, getClientRects also works.
I suspect the cause of all this trouble with these particular elements was the use of innerHTML instead of appendChild, but that is pure speculation at this point.
offsetHeight, usually.
If you need to calculate something but not show it, set the element to visibility:hidden and position:absolute, add it to the DOM tree, get the offsetHeight, and remove it. (That's what the prototype library does behind the scenes last time I checked).
Sometimes offsetHeight will return zero because the element you've created has not been rendered in the Dom yet. I wrote this function for such circumstances:
function getHeight(element)
{
var e = element.cloneNode(true);
e.style.visibility = "hidden";
document.body.appendChild(e);
var height = e.offsetHeight + 0;
document.body.removeChild(e);
e.style.visibility = "visible";
return height;
}
If you are using jQuery already, your best bet is .outerHeight() or .height(), as has been stated.
Without jQuery, you can check the box-sizing in use and add up various paddings + borders + clientHeight, or you can use getComputedStyle:
var h = getComputedStyle(document.getElementById('someDiv')).height;
h will now be a string like a "53.825px".
And I can't find the reference, but I think I heard getComputedStyle() can be expensive, so it's probably not something you want to call on each window.onscroll event (but then, neither is jQuery's height()).
With MooTools:
$('someDiv').getSize().y
If i understood your question correctly, then maybe something like this would help:
function testDistance(node1, node2) {
/* get top position of node 1 */
let n1Pos = node1.offsetTop;
/* get height of node 1 */
let n1Height = node1.clientHeight;
/* get top position of node 2 */
let n2Pos = node2.offsetTop;
/* get height of node 2 */
let n2Height = node2.clientHeight;
/* add height of both nodes */
let heightTogether = n1Height + n2Height;
/* calculate distance from top of node 1 to bottom of node 2 */
let actualDistance = (n2Pos + n2Height) - n1Pos;
/* if the distance between top of node 1 and bottom of node 2
is bigger than their heights combined, than there is something between them */
if (actualDistance > heightTogether) {
/* do something here if they are not together */
console.log('they are not together');
} else {
/* do something here if they are together */
console.log('together');
}
}
Have you set the height in the css specifically? If you haven't you need to use offsetHeight; rather than height
var h = document.getElementById('someDiv').style.offsetHeight;
I am facing challenges in once the section reaches the top of the window that section add one class, anyone has the answer please share with me.
You're looking for a scrollSpy, Bootstrap has one built in you could easily implement without having to reinvent the wheel.
In short, the solution lies within comparing the window.scrollTop to the position of the element you are interested in. This usually has top and an offsetX which you can use to calculate how far up you are in the viewport.
with jquery you can code like this :
$(document).ready(function () {
$(window).scroll(function() {
var scroll_top = $(document).scrollTop();
var element_offset_top = $('#mainFooter').offset().top;
if (scroll_top >= element_offset_top) {
$('#mainFooter').addClass('classname');
} else {
$('#mainFooter').removeClass('classname');
}
});
});
I used element with id="mainFooter" for this example code. also "classname" is your desired class name.
I have a carousel (Owl Carousel) with vertically centered controls. Because of the structure, I have to absolutely position the previous and next arrow. Because the page is responsive, their position is dynamic. The size of the controls may also change.
I've written a function that runs on load and resize. It gets the height of the image and the height of the controls, subtracts the latter from the former, divides by two, and then uses that number as the controls' margin-top.
It works, but I'm questioning if I'm getting and using all the variables correctly. Does JavaScript read in order? Where it runs the first line, then the next, then the next... I'm strong in CSS but JS has always been a crutch.
Can I write this more efficiently?
function centerCarouselControls() {
var carouselImage = $('.carousel-card > img');
var carouselControls = $('.owl-nav > div');
var carouselHeight = carouselImage.outerHeight();
var controlHeight = carouselControls.outerHeight();
var controlMargin = (carouselHeight - controlHeight) / 2;
carouselControls.css('margin-top', controlMargin);
}
$('.carousel-card > img').load(centerCarouselControls);
$(window).on('resize', centerCarouselControls);
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
I feel like this might be the type of question that gets flagged on here for not being specific enough. If that's the case, could someone please point me to a community where this would be more appropriate? Thanks!
In some browsers your code works like firefox 51, but it is more complete code this:
carouselControls.css('margin-top', controlMargin + 'px');
Problem:
I'm trying to fadeIn and fadeOut div class="audioBox" once the user scrolls past the header. What I have seems to work fine, except for when the page is loaded and I'm already past the 835px height of the header/
Q: What I'm seeing is when I scroll the audioBox quickly fades in and then fades out, despite scroll >= header How do I prevent this from happening?
scripts.js
// If the reader scrolls past header, show audioBox
var scroll = $(window).scrollTop();
var header = $("header").height();
if (scroll >= header) {
$(".audioBox").fadeIn();
} else if (scroll <= header) {
$(".audioBox").fadeOut();
}
I tried implementing what you're describing in jsfiddle at http://jsfiddle.net/3wqfp2ch/1/.
I'd approach it a bit differently, based on the following ideas:
I personally prefer letting CSS take care of visual stuff via classes, and let jQuery take the simple responsibility of controlling when the classes should be added/removed. I think it makes for a better relationship between the two systems and allows each to do their thing better & more neatly.
I didn't see where you were listening for scroll events on the window, which is essential for figuring out whether a user's scroll position is before or after the header, so have included this in my code
I don't think we need multiple if conditions - there's just one question: "Is the scroll position greater than the header height?".
Here's the JS:
var headerHeight = $("header").height();
var audioBox = $('#audioBox');
$(window).on('scroll', function(){
var scrollPosition = $(window).scrollTop();
if (scrollPosition > headerHeight) {
audioBox.addClass('is-visible');
} else {
audioBox.removeClass('is-visible');
}
});
Check out my fiddle at http://jsfiddle.net/3wqfp2ch/1/ for the HTML & CSS that this relates to, and the working demo putting it all together.
I can't test whether this suffers from the same issue regarding you loading at a point already past the header height from jsfiddle unfortunately, but I wouldn't be expecting the behaviour you described using the code above.
Let me know how you get on!
Calling .fadeIn() or .fadeOut() all the time and having an overlap in the conditions might be the problem.
Try this:
// If the reader scrolls past header, show audioBox
var scroll = $(window).scrollTop();
var header = $("header").offset().top + $("header").height(); // should include the header's offset as well
if (scroll >= header) {
$(".audioBox:hidden").fadeIn();
} else if (scroll < header) {
$(".audioBox:visible").fadeOut();
}
I'd like to know how could I get only the displayed controls in the screen in the very moment.
For example:
If I have a scrollbar which precludes the user from seeing everything
below the page, I'd like to make a selector which selects only what the user can see in his screen now. It would also be nice If I could select everything he does not see.
Is that possible? How?
Thanks
You could calculate the offsets (say, as the user scrolls) of what the user can see:
var top = $(window).scrollTop();
var bottom = top + $(window).height();
Then, you can see if an element is within this range.
$('*').each( function() {
var el = $(this);
var offsetTop = el.offset().top;
var inView = offsetTop >= top && offsetTop <= bottom;
el.addClass( inView ? 'in-view' : 'out-of-view' );
} );
Obviously there are some downsides performance wise to doing this. Depending what you want to do with this information you could select only inputs or whatever which might help.
I don't know if there is an easy or elegant solution to this. What you could do is calculate the offset position of all elements and the scroll offset to find out which elements are visible or not. This could become expensive if you have a lot of elements to check, but could work quite nicely otherwise.