Question
Every 2 seconds interval, the two numbers (i.e. Number 1 and Number 2) will generate random numbers containing integer values from 5 to 6.
For every random numbers generated, the 2 seconds interval will be reduced by 0.1 seconds.
The random speed text will show the current seconds interval for every random numbers generated.
Once the interval reaches 0.8 seconds, a javascript alert box will show the message “The interval has reached 0.8 seconds”.
When the user dismisses the alert, the random speed text is reset to the initial values and restarts the speed of two numbers to be randomly generated for every interval.
Current Code
var no1, no2, correctScore, wrongScore, missedScore, generatedNum, delay
generateTotal = 30;
function updateScreen(disabled) {
$('#correctScore').text(correctScore);
$('#wrongScore').text(wrongScore);
$('#missedScore').text(missedScore);
$('#generatedNum > span').text(generatedNum);
$("#number1 > span").text(no1);
$("#number2 > span").text(no2);
$(":input").val(generatedNum >= generateTotal ? "START!" : "MATCH!");
$(":input").prop('disabled', disabled);
}
function generate() {
if (no1 == no2 && !$(":input").prop('disabled')) ++missedScore;
if (generatedNum >= generateTotal) {
updateScreen(false); // needed to show missedScore.
if (confirm('The interval has reached 0.8 seconds')) start();
return; // exit
}
no1 = 5 + Math.floor(Math.random()*2);
no2 = 5 + Math.floor(Math.random()*2);
++generatedNum;
updateScreen(false);
setTimeout(generate, delay *= 0.95);
}
function start() {
correctScore = wrongScore = missedScore = generatedNum = 0;
delay = 2000;
updateScreen(true);
generate();
}
function check() {
if (generatedNum >= generateTotal) return start(); // Start pressed
if (no1 == no2) {
++correctScore;
} else {
++wrongScore;
}
updateScreen(true); // disable button
}
$(function(){
$(":input").click(check);
start();
});
$(function(){
$(":input").click(check);
start();
});
Related
I have a pomodoro timer that is supposed to count down the "workminutes" a user has input and then the break minutes and then loop. The timer starts to count down WorkMinutes like it should and then break minutes(like it should), it then restarts and counts down the workminutes again like it should BUT when its done with that and it comes to the breakminutes a second time instead of counting down from eg. 1 minute it counts from -1 minute and up, so -1 minute and one second and so on. I'm a complete beginner in JavaScript so it would be very nice if you kept that in mind, any help i greatly appreciated. Here is the JavaScript code:
// we need some variables to store the work and break minutes
var workSeconds = "120", breakSeconds = "60";
// and a referens to interval
var xInterval;
var audio = new Audio('Bell_finished.mp3');
// start function
function start() {
xInterval = setInterval(workCountDown, 1000);
}
// stop function
function stop() {
clearInterval(xInterval);
}
// reset function; calls stop, save which re-stores the values of user inputs and then starts again.
function reset() {
stop();
save();
start();
}
// save function that saves the values of user inputs
function save() {
workSeconds = parseInt(document.getElementById("TaskTime").value)*60;
breakMinutes = parseInt(document.getElementById("BreakTime").value)*60;
}
// working count down function
function workCountDown() {
// counting down work seconds
workSeconds--;
// showing work seconds in "0:0" format:
document.getElementById("timer").innerText = Math.floor((workSeconds / 60)).toString() + ":" + (workSeconds % 60).toString();
// if workSeconds reaches to zero, stops the workInterval and starts the breakInterval:
if (workSeconds == 0) {
audio.play();
console.log("relaxing...");
clearInterval(xInterval);
xInterval = setInterval(breakCountDown, 1000);
}
}
// breaking count down function
function breakCountDown() {
// counting down break seconds
breakSeconds--;
// showing break seconds in "0:0" format:
document.getElementById("timer").innerText = Math.floor((breakSeconds / 60)).toString() + ":" + (breakSeconds % 60).toString();
// if breakSeconds reaches to zero, stops the breakInterval, resets the variables to initial values by calling save function and starts the workInterval again:
if (breakSeconds == 0) {
audio.play();
console.log("ready to work...");
reset();
}
}
as I said in the comment it works fine, just change breakMinutes to breakSeconds inside save function. here is an implementation of your code. you can run the snippet here and see the result
// we need some variables to store the work and break minutes
let workSeconds = "120",
breakSeconds = "60";
// and a referens to interval
let xInterval;
let isStarted = false;
// start function
function start() {
xInterval = setInterval(workCountDown, 1000);
}
// stop function
function stop() {
clearInterval(xInterval);
}
// reset function; calls stop, save which re-stores the values of user inputs and then starts again.
function reset() {
stop();
save();
start();
}
// save function that saves the values of user inputs
function save() {
workSeconds =
parseInt(document.getElementById("TaskTime").value || 120, 10) * 60;
breakSeconds =
parseInt(document.getElementById("BreakTime").value || 60, 10) * 60;
}
// working count down function
function workCountDown() {
// counting down work seconds
workSeconds--;
// showing work seconds in "0:0" format:
document.getElementById("timer").innerText =
Math.floor(workSeconds / 60).toString() +
":" +
(workSeconds % 60).toString();
// if workSeconds reaches to zero, stops the workInterval and starts the breakInterval:
if (workSeconds === 0) {
console.log("relaxing...");
clearInterval(xInterval);
xInterval = setInterval(breakCountDown, 1000);
}
}
// breaking count down function
function breakCountDown() {
// counting down break seconds
breakSeconds--;
// showing break seconds in "0:0" format:
document.getElementById("timer").innerText =
Math.floor(breakSeconds / 60).toString() +
":" +
(breakSeconds % 60).toString();
// if breakSeconds reaches to zero, stops the breakInterval, resets the variables to initial values by calling save function and starts the workInterval again:
if (breakSeconds === 0) {
console.log("ready to work...");
reset();
}
}
const startButton = document.getElementById("start-btn");
startButton.addEventListener("click", (e) => {
isStarted = !isStarted;
if (isStarted) {
save();
start();
startButton.textContent = "Stop";
} else {
stop();
startButton.textContent = "Start";
document.getElementById("timer").innerText = 0;
}
});
<label>Work Time: <input type="number" id="TaskTime" value="1" /></label>
<label>Break Time: <input type="number" id="BreakTime" value="1" /></label>
<div id="timer">0</div>
<button id="start-btn">Start</button>
I'm creating a countdown, which i need to count down it to 0 but in random numbers.
Ex- countdown from 4 minutes by second by second, but i need to show a value between 300 to 390 countdown to 0 with random numbers within above 4 minutes period.
I created random number count down, but still cannot able to figure out how to target that become 0 within given time.
<script>
var count = 350; //this is a random value between(300-390)
var timer = setInterval(function() {
//this will generate number between 0 to 10 and reduce it from count randimly
count -= Math.floor(Math.random()*9);
//set it to html element
jQuery('#maindvpart').html(count);
//when number become 0
if( count <= 0) {
jQuery('#maindvpart').html(0);
count = 0;
clearInterval(timer);
}
//but i need to run this countdown within 4 minutes
//(so when 0 minutes ends above count should zero, until 0 it should count down from random number)
},1000);
</script>
<div id="maindvpart"> </div>
anyone have idea or example how to do this, thank you
Your "timer" runs each second. When you do "count -= Math.floor(Math.random()*9);", it reduces "count" variable value much faster, so you will always reach "count <= 0" much faster than 4 minutes. If you want to run your timer for 4 minutes, you need to run your timer per second - 240 times, and "display a random number", but do not subtract that random number from count. Does this help?
Editing with an example, hoping it would point you towards your goal:
<script>
var count = 240; //4 minutes
var displayNumber = 350; //or whatever number you want to start with
var timer = setInterval(function() {
//this will generate number between 0 to 10 and reduce it from displayNumber randomly
displayNumber -= Math.floor(Math.random()*9);
count--;
console.log(displayNumber);
// exit if either the display number is <= 0 or the time is up
if( displayNumber <= 0 || count <= 0) {
console.log(0);
displayNumber = 0;
clearInterval(timer);
}
},1000);
</script>
Solution 1:
simply modify the time interval after which the random number is reduced by unit step (ie:1) to indicate the time step necessary for the random number to equal 0 when the time is up . the equation would be :
{delay before subtracting 1 from rand# (in sec) = time elapsed till rand# reaches 0 (in sec)/rand#}
ex:
1) rand# = 300 , needed to count down till reaches 0 in 2 minutes (120sec) , then 300 needs to count down by 1 each 120/300 sec
var count = 300 // your randomly generated number;
var time = 60 //time elapsed before the random number to equal 0;
var timer = setInterval(function() {
count = count -1;
console.log(count);
if( count <= 0) {
count = 0;
clearInterval(timer);
}
},(time/count)*1000);
Solution 2:
modify the unit step by which the random number is decreased every second till it reaches 0 after the specified time is elapsed . the equation would be :
{random # decrement step = rand#/time elapsed till rand# reaches 0 (in sec)}
ex:
1) rand# = 300 , needed to count down till reaches 0 in 1 minute (60sec) , then 300 needs to count down by 300/60 each 1 sec
var count = 300 // your randomly generated number;
var time = 20 //time elapsed before the random number to equal 0;
var decrementStep=count/time;
var timer = setInterval(function() {
count = count - decrementStep;
console.log(count);
if( count <= 0) {
count = 0;
clearInterval(timer);
}
},1000);
I need to increment the value from 0 to 103551 in 5 seconds. Below is the logic I have used. But it's not incrementing to the required value within 5 secs
var counter = 0;
var el = document.getElementById('seconds-counter');
function incrementSeconds() {
counter += 1;
el.innerText = "Processing " + counter + " execution records";
if(counter == 103551) {
console.log(new Date());
}
}
console.log(new Date());
var time = 103551/5000;
var cancel = setInterval(incrementSeconds, time);
HTML
<div id='seconds-counter'> </div>
Your math is a little off. 103551/5000 = 20.7102ms
1000ms = 1s, 5s = 5000ms, 5000/20.7102 = 240 iterations.
The equation you want to solve is 5000/x = numIterations
So x = 5000/numIterations
Note: Most browsers have a minimum number you can set in setInterval(), so you may need to increment by more than 1 each loop to count to 103551 in 5 seconds. Since this is an oddly specific problem I'm going to gues that this might be an assignment so will omit a full solution from this answer. Good luck!
I am working on simple script that should animate given value (for example 6345.23) to 0 by counting it down, it should also end up at 0 if specified amount of time have passed (for example 2 seconds.
I started by simple logic:
given config: initial value, time in sec, interval
time is given in seconds so convert it to milliseconds
calculate amount of ticks by dividing time in ms by interval
calculate amount of decreased value per tick by dividing initial value by amount of ticks
once above are known we can simply do: (simple model, not actual code)
intId = setInterval(function() {
if(ticks_made === amount_of_ticks) {
clearInterval(intId);
} else {
value -= amount_per_tick;
// update view
}
}, interval);
actual code:
var value = 212.45,
time = 2, // in seconds
interval = 20; // in milliseconds
var time_to_ms = time * 1000,
amount_of_ticks = time_to_ms / interval,
amount_per_tick = (value / amount_of_ticks).toFixed(5);
var start_time = new Date();
var ticks_made = 0;
var intId = setInterval(function() {
if(ticks_made === amount_of_ticks) {
console.log('start time', start_time);
console.log('end time', new Date());
console.log('total ticks: ', amount_of_ticks, 'decresed by tick: ', amount_per_tick);
clearInterval(intId);
} else {
value = (value - amount_per_tick).toFixed(5);
console.log('running', ticks_made, value);
}
ticks_made++;
}, interval);
Link do fiddle (in console you can observe how it works)
If you set time to 2 (2 seconds) its ok, but if you set time to for example 2.55 (2.55 seconds) it doesnt stop at all at 0, its passing by and going indefinitely in negative values.
How i can fix it so no matter what is set in seconds its always go precisly one by one until reaches perfectly 0?
var value = 212.45,
time = 2, // in seconds
interval = 20; // in milliseconds
var time_to_ms = time * 1000,
amount_of_ticks = time_to_ms / interval,
amount_per_tick = (value / amount_of_ticks).toFixed(5);
var start_time = new Date();
var ticks_made = 0;
var intId = setInterval(function() {
if(ticks_made === amount_of_ticks) {
console.log('start time', start_time);
console.log('end time', new Date());
console.log('total ticks: ', amount_of_ticks, 'decresed by tick: ', amount_per_tick);
clearInterval(intId);
} else {
value = (value - amount_per_tick).toFixed(5);
console.log('running', ticks_made, value);
}
ticks_made++;
}, interval);
You're relying on ticks_made === amount_of_ticks being an exact match. Chances are, due to rounding, you won't get an exact match, so you'd be better off doing:
if(ticks_made >= amount_of_ticks) {
kshetline's answer correctly addresses why you get into negative values. When dealing with fractional IEEE-754 double-precision binary numbers (in the normal range, or even whole numbers in very high ranges), == and === can be problematic (for instance, 0.1 + 0.2 == 0.3 is false). Dealing with values as small as the fractional values here are, accumulated imprecision is also a factor. It's inevitable to have to fudge the final step.
But there's a larger issue: You can't rely on timers firing on a precise schedule. Many, many things can prevent their doing so — other UI rendering work, other scripts, CPU load, the tab being inactive, etc.
Instead, the fundamental technique for animation on browsers is:
Update when you can
Update based on where you should be in the animation based on time, not based on how many times you've animated
Use requestAnimationFrame so your update synchronizes with the browser's refresh
Here's your code updated to do that, see comments:
// Tell in-snippet console to keep all lines (rather than limiting to 50)
console.config({maxEntries: Infinity});
var value = 212.45,
time = 2.55, // in seconds
time_in_ms = time * 1000,
amount_per_ms = value / time_in_ms,
interval = 100 / 6, // in milliseconds, ~16.66ms is a better fit for browser's natural refresh than 20ms
ticks_made = 0;
// A precise way to get relative milliseconds timings
var now = typeof performance !== "undefined" && performance.now
? performance.now.bind(performance)
: Date.now.bind(Date);
// Remember when we started
var started = now();
// Because of the delay between the interval timer and requestAnimationFrame,
// we need to flag when we're done
var done = false;
// Use the interval to request rendering on the next frame
var intId = setInterval(function() {
requestAnimationFrame(render);
}, interval);
// About half-way in, an artificial 200ms delay outside your control interrupts things
setTimeout(function() {
console.log("************DELAY************");
var stop = now() + 200;
while (now() < stop) {
// Busy-loop, preventing anything else from happening
}
}, time_in_ms / 2);
// Our "render" function (okay, so we just call console.log in this example, but
// in your real code you'd be doing a DOM update)
function render() {
if (done) {
return;
}
++ticks_made;
var elapsed = now() - started;
if (elapsed >= time_in_ms) {
console.log(ticks_made, "done");
done = true;
clearInterval(intId);
} else {
var current_value = value - (amount_per_ms * elapsed);
console.log(ticks_made, current_value);
}
}
/* Maximize in-snippet console */
.as-console-wrapper {
max-height: 100% !important;
}
If you run that, then scroll up to the "************DELAY************" line, you'll see that even though rendering was held up by "another process", we continue with the appropriate next value to render.
It would make sense to convert the result of .toFixed() to a number right away:
let amount_per_tick = +(value / amount_of_ticks).toFixed(5);
let value = +(value - amount_per_tick).toFixed(5);
(note the + signs)
Then you will never have to worry about type coercion or anything, and instead just focus on math.
Please Help! I'm new to Javascript, so there's probably an easier solution to this. Basically, I need it to prompt for a number and then count down from that number to zero. Once it reaches zero, I need it to count-up and stop at the same prompted number.
I got it to count down at first, then I completely butchered it, I have no clue what to do.
<script type="text/javascript">
// get number from user
var startNum = parseInt(prompt("Input a number to start counting down from.",""));
var counter = setInterval(timer, 1000);
console.log(startNum);
function timer() {
startNum--; // reduce number by 1
console.log(startNum);
if (startNum <= 0) {
clearInterval(counter);
}
}
var counter = setInterval(timer2, 1000);
var endNum = 0
function timer2() {
console.log(endNum)
endNum++; // add number by 1
console.log(endNum);
if (endNum >= startNum) {
clearInterval(counter);
}
}
</script>
You've got a couple issues here. the first one was pointed out by Rob in the comments. You're running both functions at the same time.
The other issue you have is that you're never storing the number. You're just subtracting and adding to nothing essentially.
So -
<script type="text/javascript">
// get number from user
var startNum = parseInt(prompt("Input a number to start counting down from.",""));
var currentNum = startNum;
var counter = setInterval(timer, 1000);
function timer() {
console.log(currentNum);
currentNum -= 1; // reduce number by 1
console.log(currentNum);
if (currentNum == 0) {
clearInterval(counter);
counter = setInterval(timer2, 1000);
}
}
function timer2() {
console.log(currentNum)
currentNum += 1; // add number by 1
console.log(currentNum);
if (currentNum == startNum) {
clearInterval(counter);
}
}
</script>
Something like this should do the trick. Basically creating another variable to hold your start number and consider that the current number and the value that is going to change.
here's a fiddle - http://jsfiddle.net/w5FM6/
cheers