We're building a wordpress builder on ReactJS and encountered a weird looking problem.
In the
screenshot you can see a wrapperStyle object with some CSS styling.The styling should change based on this.props. When this.props changes, the console.log for this object returns
this.props.fullSlideshowWidth = 1920px
and
this.props.slideshowWidth = 1400px
I expected the style attribute in DOM to change it's value too, however it doesn't change.
For example if I access a full width slideshow page, the style attribute will have max-width: 1920px. If I access a different page with a normal slideshow the style attribute will remain the same, although the value in console.log will change.
You might try;
var wrapperStyle = {};
wrapperStyle.marginBottom = this.getFlux()...;
wrapperStyle.maxWidth = this.props...;
wrapperSytle.height = this.props...;
Thank you guys who tried to help me, I solved the issue by editing the props:
slideshowWidth = {this.state.settings.images.sizes.slideshow.width+'px !important'}
I just removed !important out of it and works without a problem, I still do not understand why !important had such a big influence on the prop.
Related
So I've been working on this web-project that demands a gallery with a slider underneath it. I've used this JavaScript so far to solve the problem in a forEach(element) function:
var divnumber = Array.from(element.parentNode.children).indexOf(element);
So the pagination changes by the index of the clicked element.
But since I need to make it responsive and the graphic designer demands something different in the mobile view I would need to get the number of the divs by using their class. Basically - the same array but different values.
Is there any way to tweak that line of code a bit to let it get the index of the element by its class instead of their parent? Here's the pen for more: https://codepen.io/ridonibishi/pen/BaNyBva
Thank you in advance!
Try using:
var divnumber = Array.from(document.getElementsByClassName('class')).indexOf(element);
It works as intended.
I am experiencing the strangest issue. I do have a component that's style is controlled by some object it's handling. As the object is manipulated (by some inner component click), the whole view collapses to a height of 0.
I have tried to apply the view changes via ngStyle, ngClass, plain ol'javascript - but nothing ever worked. Second strange thing - handling outer component's component styles is perfectly working.
Object
const valueMap = {
width: '100%',
...
}
Pseudo Component Tree
<component-a>
<component-b [ngStyle]="{'width': valueMap.width} [valueMap]="valueMap">
<div (click)="changePosition()">Button</div>
</component-b>
</component-a>
Method
changePosition() {
this.valueMap.width = this.valueMap.width==='100%' ? '50%' : '100%';
}
I would really expect the component-b to collapse to a width of 50%, but not having the height collapse to zero. I can see in the code, that as I click the button the style is applied to the element - and if in Chrome DevTools I deactivate the applied style and activate it again, it is showing properly. Never had something like this. Can someone please help?
Thanks in advance. André
I tried to recreate your problem. altough i couldnt get the error you seem to be having, i think i can see the issue at hand:
from your html
<component-a>
<component-b [ngStyle]="{width: 'valueMap.width'} [valueMap]="valueMap">
<div (click)="changePosition()">Button</div>
</component-b>
</component-a>
i could get, that your "valueMap" is an Input() within component-b.
so i did that on my end aswell and declared valuemap on the outermost component (the one using component a and b)
i recreated your html and found parsing errors and whatnot until i realized something:
<app-collapse-on-click>
<app-collapse-child [ngStyle]="{'width': valueMap.width, 'background-color': 'rebeccapurple'}" [valueMap]="valueMap">
<div><button (click)="changePosition()">Button</button></div>
</app-collapse-child>
</app-collapse-on-click>
when using ngStyle, the style is interpreted as an object. meaning, in your case you need to remove the ' arround valueMap.width and add them to width.
i added the background color to get a visual result other than just the style html.
hope that somehow helps.
regards
Alan
http://jsfiddle.net/10h8t3ah/
function changeHeight(rowNum) {
document.getElementById("demo").style.height= "70px";
var fooBar = document.getElementById(rowNum);
fooBar.style.height = "100px";
}
What I am trying to accomplish here is to pass through a variable defined as row1, row2, row3, and row4 as rowNum and it will change the height of both the link and the paragraph with the corresponding row#.
I am trying to pass the ID of both the paragraph and the link so that if you hover over the link and vice versa, the height will change.
Essentially, if you hover over either the link or the paragraph, the corresponding containers side by side of each other will expand in height and the text in the paragraph will be visible. The paragraph text I have set with wrap-text property of break word but it seems to just overflow out anyway.
OK - there are couple of concepts that need to be corrected to understand why this is not working:
the id of a DOM object must be unique (your jsfiddle uses the same ID on both of your "rows" - I've updated your code to use a class instead of an id so that)
the parameter you are passing to your changeHeight function must be a string (if you pass row1, then row1 must be a defined variable, instead you should pass 'row1' -- again, see my updated fiddle code)
Here is a jsfiddle that does most of what you want, I think : http://jsfiddle.net/zwyr4hn1/10/
There were also a couple of little things that I've fixed up:
1. you need to return the other rows back to the smaller size when a new one is hovered (I've used the class row on all the row objects to do this ) 2. this css is needed to get your a objects to resize in the way you want : a { display: inline-block; }
I haven't addressed the wrap-text issue you mentioned because I didn't see that on the jsfiddle.
Instead of designing the complex JavaScript functions on your own, ust use accordion to expand the contents. Here's the Bootstrap framework accordions, especially designed for these purposes.
Link to page where you can learn more about it.
http://www.w3schools.com/bootstrap/bootstrap_collapse.asp
I have a slide in menu using vanilla javascript for use on phones, but so far all my tests have resulted in the mobile browsers ignoring the first tap (have tried both touchstart & click as events). Starting with the second tap it works beautifully with each and every subsequent tap.
As opening & closing the menu is the only javascript function on the pages, I don't want to load a huge library, I want to keep it simple and small. My code is below:
var b = document.getElementById('menubtn');
b.addEventListener('touchstart', function (e) {
var n = document.getElementById('nav');
var ns = n.style.left;
if (ns == "-600px") {
n.style.left = "0px";
} else {
n.style.left = "-600px";
}
e.preventDefault();
});
Any ways to easily eliminate this need for double clicking the first time?
In the fwiw dept, it is a responsive design, with the nav menu in a column on big screens and a slide in on phones.
Edit: Solved the issue
Following through on Matt Styles comment, I tried using classList.toggle and it solved the issue. The final version is below:
var b = document.getElementById('menubtn');
var n = document.getElementById('nav');
b.addEventListener('touchstart', function () {
n.classList.toggle('shwmenu');
setTimeout(function () {
b.classList.toggle('shwmenu');
}, 500);
});
I added the delayed menubtn code to toggle the icon between closed and open states.
The behaviour you describe could be caused by the following:
In your JS you try to implement some kind of On-Off toggle for your nav element, differentiated on the left CSS property value, with -600 representing the off value and 0 representing the on value.
As you said, toggling between those states seems to work fine, but what happens when your element is NOT initialized on exactly -600? Then on your first tap you will always run into your else clause and set it to -600 first, showing effectively no visual effect on your first tap, just as you describe.
For an instant test, just swap the if-else clause around to turn it on when style.left is not -600 and then maybe work up towards a more dynamic differentiation between your states ;)
I think this is because element.style.left is empty even if you have set left property in your stylesheet. You can use element.offsetLeft instead. Please see here to how it works.
HTMLElement.style - MDN
The style property is not useful for learning about the element's style in general, since it represents only the CSS declarations set in the element's inline style attribute, not those that come from style rules elsewhere, such as style rules in the <head> section, or external style sheets. To get the values of all CSS properties for an element you should use window.getComputedStyle() instead.
Another noob question, this one is quite a mystery to me.
I'm trying to inject a JS code, and making use of iFrame for this.
Test url -> http://ultimateclassicmovies.com/horror/the-brain-that-wouldnt-die/
Here I initially created a hidden iFrame
and then i'm injecting into it a new JS code:
document.getElementById('movie_loader').src = 'jwplayer.php?id=5');
and making it visible:
document.getElementById('movie_loader').visibility = 'visible';
but nothing happens as you can see. both SRC and VISIBILIY props aren't updated.
The same happened when I used the DISPLAY property.
Any idea?
You're missing 'style'.
document.getElementById('movie_loader').style.visibility = 'visible';
or better, use "display" rather than "visibility (use display: none; to start):
document.getElementById('movie_loader').style.display = 'block';
You have a syntax error on the first line with an extra ) on the end, and you need to add .style on the second line, like this:
document.getElementById('movie_loader').src = 'jwplayer.php?id=5';
document.getElementById('movie_loader').style.visibility = 'visible';
Styles on an element are stored as an object under .style, not as direct properties.
Though, once you fix this... it can't find that jwplayer.php file, it's a 404, so you need to adjust the path somehow...I'm not sure exactly where on your site it's located, but it's not found at: http://ultimateclassicmovies.com/horror/the-brain-that-wouldnt-die/jwplayer.php?id=5