I am using React 15 on Chrome and want to hook up an event listener to detect changes to a parent container. After looking around for options, I came across ResizeObserver and am not sure how to get it to work in my project.
Currently, I am putting it in my constructor but it does not seem to print any text and I am not sure what to put in the observe call.
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
const resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver((entries) => {
console.log("Hello World");
});
resizeObserver.observe(somethingGoesHere);
}
render() {
return (
<AnotherComponent>
<YetAnotherComponent>
</YetAnotherComponent>
<CanYouBelieveIt>
</CanYouBelieveIt>
<RealComponent />
</AnotherComponent>
);
}
}
Ideally, I also don't want to wrap RealComponent in a div and give that div an id. Is there a way to the RealComponent directly?
My goal is to observe any resize changes to the RealComponent but MyComponent is fine too. What should I put in the somethingGoesHere slot?
EDIT:
For the sake of getting something to work, I bit the bullet and wrapped a div tag around RealComponent. I then gave it an id <div id="myDivTag"> and changed the observe call:
resizeObserver.observe(document.getElementById("myDivTag"));
However, when running this, I get:
Uncaught TypeError: resizeObserver.observe is not a function
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
ComponentDidMount would be the best place to set up your observer but you also want to disconnect on ComponentWillUnmount.
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
resizeObserver = null;
resizeElement = createRef();
componentDidMount() {
this.resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver((entries) => {
// do things
});
this.resizeObserver.observe(this.resizeElement.current);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
if (this.resizeObserver) {
this.resizeObserver.disconnect();
}
}
render() {
return (
<div ref={this.resizeElement}>
...
</div>
);
}
}
EDIT: Davidicus's answer below is more complete, look there first
ResizeObserver can't go in the constructor because the div doesn't exist at that point in the component lifecycle.
I don't think you can get around the extra div because react components reduce to html elements anyway.
Put this in componentDidMount and it should work:
componentDidMount() {
const resizeObserver = new ResizeObserver((entries) => {
console.log("Hello World");
});
resizeObserver.observe(document.getElementById("myDivTag"));
}
I was fighting a the similar problem recently with the difference that my app is predominantly using hooks and functional components.
Here is an example how to use the ResizeObserver within a React functional component (in typescript):
const resizeObserver = React.useRef<ResizeObserver>(new ResizeObserver((entries:ResizeObserverEntry[]) => {
// your code to handle the size change
}));
const resizedContainerRef = React.useCallback((container: HTMLDivElement) => {
if (container !== null) {
resizeObserver.current.observe(container);
}
// When element is unmounted, ref callback is called with a null argument
// => best time to cleanup the observer
else {
if (resizeObserver.current)
resizeObserver.current.disconnect();
}
}, [resizeObserver.current]);
return <div ref={resizedContainerRef}>
// Your component content here
</div>;
Hi All I am a beginner in javaScript and currently exploring JS Web-component and I got stuck due to some use cases
1 ) I want to pass a JS Object into my component like
<my-component data=obj ></my-component>
And require to use inside my component code Like
connectedCallback () {
console.log(this.data) // it should print {"name":"xyz" , "role" : "dev"}
}
2 ) I also need to pass some functions or maybe call back functions like.
function myFunction(e){
console.log(e)
}
<my-component click=myFunction ></my-component>
please try to add code snippet also in ans that will help me to learn more JS.
Thanks
You should pass large object by Javascript.
Via a custom element method:
let comp = document.querySelector( 'my-component' )
comp.myMethod( obj )
Or setting a property:
comp.data = obj
It is best to pass in complex data using a property and not an attribute.
myEl.data = {a:1,b:'two'};
The standard on events work fine on a custom element:
function myFunction(e){
alert(JSON.stringify(e.target.data));
e.target.data = {a:1,b:"two"};
}
class MyComponent extends HTMLElement {
constructor() {
super();
this._data = 0;
this.attachShadow({mode:'open'}).innerHTML="Click Me";
}
static get observedAttributes() {
return ['data'];
}
attributeChangedCallback(attrName, oldVal, newVal) {
if (oldVal !== newVal) {
}
}
get data() {
return this._data;
}
set data(newVal) {
this._data = newVal;
}
}
customElements.define('my-component', MyComponent);
<my-component onclick="myFunction(event)"></my-component>
If your component dispatches a custom event then it is best to access it through code:
function specialEventHandler(evt) {
// do something
}
myEl.addEventListener('special-event;', specialEventHandler);
I did a Udemy course with Andreas Galster and the tutor passed in a JSON object via attribute.
As you can see it needs encodeURIComponent and decodeURIComponent as well to
attributeChangedCallback (name, oldValue, newValue) {
if (newValue && name === 'profile-data') {
this.profileData = JSON.parse(decodeURIComponent(newValue));
this.removeAttribute('profile-data');
}
this.render();
}
Pass in:
<profile-card profile-data=${encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(profile))}>
</profile-card>
The code worked fine for me.
Ad 1) You need to use JSON.stringify(obj)
Ad 2) As far as I know All attributes need to be defined as strings. You can pass the function that is global and inside component try to eval(fn)
I'm trying to update state variable when button click.but my issue is,it's update once with correct data then again it updated with constructor defined data.
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
popupshow: [{ check: false, id: '' }]
}
}
componentDidUpdate(prevProps, prevState) {
console.log("this.state.popupshow",this.state.popupshow)
}
Details(type){
this.state.popupshow[i].id = type
this.state.popupshow[i].check = true;
this.setState({ popupshow: this.state.popupshow });
}
render() {
return (
<a onClick={() => this.Details("Tv Series")}>Update </>
)
}
my console.log is like bellow
You should not update React state directly. You should always update/set React state via setState method.
These lines are against React principal
this.state.popupshow[i].id = type
this.state.popupshow[i].check = true;
Update your Details as follows
Details(type){
let { popupshow } = this.state;
let i = 0;
popupshow[i].id = type
popupshow[i].check = true;
this.setState({ popupshow });
}
Note I dont have idea of variable i so assumed that as 0
I think you should rewrite details functions like :
Details(type, i){
const popupDetail = Object.assign([], this.state.popupshow);
popupDetail[i].id = type
popupDetail[i].check = true;
this.setState({ popupshow: popupDetail });
}
you are setting popupshow: this.state.popupshow this is causing forceupdate which re renders the component hence its value gets reset.
I totally agree with the other answers have given for the question, however there are few things worth noting is you might wanna add the function to the context.
The argument in favour of adding these lines to the constructor is so that the new bound functions are only created once per instance of the class. You could also use
onClick={this.Details.bind(this, "Tv Series")}
or (ES6):
onClick={() => this.Details("Tv Series")}
but either of these methods will create a new function every time the component is re-rendered.
Then change the function to arrow fucntion too like
Details(type, i){
const popupDetail = Object.assign([], this.state.popupshow);
popupDetail[i].id = type
popupDetail[i].check = true;
this.setState({ popupshow: popupDetail });
}
I have a React component with a method:
class Timer extends Component{
start(){
this.timerInterval=setInterval(this.tick,1000);
}
[...]
}
I want to be able to call the method start() whenever the user presses a combination of keys.
In my main.js file I have:
app.on('ready', function(){
createWindow();
globalShortcut('Cmd+Alt+K',function(){
//call start() here
})
});
How can I achieve this? There's not much information I could find on this subject.
When in need of use of electron library inside react you should import it using electron remote
const { globalShortcut } = require('electron').remote;
class Timer extends Component{
componentDidMount = () => {
globalShortcut.register('Cmd+Alt+K', () => {
//your call
this.start()
});
}
start(){
this.timerInterval=setInterval(this.tick,1000);
}
[...]
}
I was hoping someone with Electron-specific experience would address this, but it's been a full day now.
To cross the outside world / React component barrier, you're probably best off using a custom event. To do that, you'll need access to the DOM element created by React in response to your render call, then listen for your custom event directly on the element. Here's an example, see the comments for details. Note that in this example I'm passing an object as the event detail; that's just to show you can do that (not just simple strings), but you could just do {detail: "Tick #" + ticker} instead and use event.detail directly as the message.
class Example extends React.Component {
// Normal component setup
constructor(...args) {
super(...args);
this.state = {message: ""};
// Our event handler. (We could also define this at the class level using the class
// fields syntax that's currently at Stage 3 in the ECMA TC39 process; most React
// setups with JSX transpile class fields syntax.)
this.doSomething = event => {
this.setState({message: event.detail.message || ""});
};
}
// Render with a way of finding the element in the DOM from outside (in this case
// I'm using a class, but it could be an ID, or just knowing where it is in the DOM).
// We use a ref so we can hook the event when the elemet is created.
render() {
return <div className="foo" ref={element => this.element = element}>{this.state.message}</div>;
}
// Hook the event on mount, unhook it on unmount
componentDidMount() {
this.element.addEventListener("my-event", this.doSomething);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
this.element.removeEventListener("my-event", this.doSomething);
}
}
// Top-level app rendering
ReactDOM.render(<Example />, document.getElementById("root"));
// Demonstrate triggering the event, in our case we do it every half-second or so
let ticker = 0;
setInterval(() => {
const foo = document.querySelector("#root .foo");
++ticker;
foo.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent("my-event", {detail: {message: "Tick #" + ticker}}));
}, 500);
<div id="root"></div>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
Is there not a simple way to pass a child's props to its parent using events, in React.js?
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function() {
<a onClick={this.props.onClick}>Click me</a>
}
});
var Parent = React.createClass({
onClick: function(event) {
// event.component.props ?why is this not available?
},
render: function() {
<Child onClick={this.onClick} />
}
});
I know you can use controlled components to pass an input's value but it'd be nice to pass the whole kit n' kaboodle. Sometimes the child component contains a set of information you'd rather not have to look up.
Perhaps there's a way to bind the component to the event?
UPDATE – 9/1/2015
After using React for over a year, and spurred on by Sebastien Lorber's answer, I've concluded passing child components as arguments to functions in parents is not in fact the React way, nor was it ever a good idea. I've switched the answer.
Edit: see the end examples for ES6 updated examples.
This answer simply handle the case of direct parent-child relationship. When parent and child have potentially a lot of intermediaries, check this answer.
Other solutions are missing the point
While they still work fine, other answers are missing something very important.
Is there not a simple way to pass a child's props to its parent using events, in React.js?
The parent already has that child prop!: if the child has a prop, then it is because its parent provided that prop to the child! Why do you want the child to pass back the prop to the parent, while the parent obviously already has that prop?
Better implementation
Child: it really does not have to be more complicated than that.
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <button onClick={this.props.onClick}>{this.props.text}</button>;
},
});
Parent with single child: using the value it passes to the child
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {childText: "Click me! (parent prop)"};
},
render: function () {
return (
<Child onClick={this.handleChildClick} text={this.state.childText}/>
);
},
handleChildClick: function(event) {
// You can access the prop you pass to the children
// because you already have it!
// Here you have it in state but it could also be
// in props, coming from another parent.
alert("The Child button text is: " + this.state.childText);
// You can also access the target of the click here
// if you want to do some magic stuff
alert("The Child HTML is: " + event.target.outerHTML);
}
});
JsFiddle
Parent with list of children: you still have everything you need on the parent and don't need to make the child more complicated.
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {childrenData: [
{childText: "Click me 1!", childNumber: 1},
{childText: "Click me 2!", childNumber: 2}
]};
},
render: function () {
var children = this.state.childrenData.map(function(childData,childIndex) {
return <Child onClick={this.handleChildClick.bind(null,childData)} text={childData.childText}/>;
}.bind(this));
return <div>{children}</div>;
},
handleChildClick: function(childData,event) {
alert("The Child button data is: " + childData.childText + " - " + childData.childNumber);
alert("The Child HTML is: " + event.target.outerHTML);
}
});
JsFiddle
It is also possible to use this.handleChildClick.bind(null,childIndex) and then use this.state.childrenData[childIndex]
Note we are binding with a null context because otherwise React issues a warning related to its autobinding system. Using null means you don't want to change the function context. See also.
About encapsulation and coupling in other answers
This is for me a bad idea in term of coupling and encapsulation:
var Parent = React.createClass({
handleClick: function(childComponent) {
// using childComponent.props
// using childComponent.refs.button
// or anything else using childComponent
},
render: function() {
<Child onClick={this.handleClick} />
}
});
Using props:
As I explained above, you already have the props in the parent so it's useless to pass the whole child component to access props.
Using refs:
You already have the click target in the event, and in most case this is enough.
Additionnally, you could have used a ref directly on the child:
<Child ref="theChild" .../>
And access the DOM node in the parent with
React.findDOMNode(this.refs.theChild)
For more advanced cases where you want to access multiple refs of the child in the parent, the child could pass all the dom nodes directly in the callback.
The component has an interface (props) and the parent should not assume anything about the inner working of the child, including its inner DOM structure or which DOM nodes it declares refs for. A parent using a ref of a child means that you tightly couple the 2 components.
To illustrate the issue, I'll take this quote about the Shadow DOM, that is used inside browsers to render things like sliders, scrollbars, video players...:
They created a boundary between what you, the Web developer can reach
and what’s considered implementation details, thus inaccessible to
you. The browser however, can traipse across this boundary at will.
With this boundary in place, they were able to build all HTML elements
using the same good-old Web technologies, out of the divs and spans
just like you would.
The problem is that if you let the child implementation details leak into the parent, you make it very hard to refactor the child without affecting the parent. This means as a library author (or as a browser editor with Shadow DOM) this is very dangerous because you let the client access too much, making it very hard to upgrade code without breaking retrocompatibility.
If Chrome had implemented its scrollbar letting the client access the inner dom nodes of that scrollbar, this means that the client may have the possibility to simply break that scrollbar, and that apps would break more easily when Chrome perform its auto-update after refactoring the scrollbar... Instead, they only give access to some safe things like customizing some parts of the scrollbar with CSS.
About using anything else
Passing the whole component in the callback is dangerous and may lead novice developers to do very weird things like calling childComponent.setState(...) or childComponent.forceUpdate(), or assigning it new variables, inside the parent, making the whole app much harder to reason about.
Edit: ES6 examples
As many people now use ES6, here are the same examples for ES6 syntax
The child can be very simple:
const Child = ({
onClick,
text
}) => (
<button onClick={onClick}>
{text}
</button>
)
The parent can be either a class (and it can eventually manage the state itself, but I'm passing it as props here:
class Parent1 extends React.Component {
handleChildClick(childData,event) {
alert("The Child button data is: " + childData.childText + " - " + childData.childNumber);
alert("The Child HTML is: " + event.target.outerHTML);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{this.props.childrenData.map(child => (
<Child
key={child.childNumber}
text={child.childText}
onClick={e => this.handleChildClick(child,e)}
/>
))}
</div>
);
}
}
But it can also be simplified if it does not need to manage state:
const Parent2 = ({childrenData}) => (
<div>
{childrenData.map(child => (
<Child
key={child.childNumber}
text={child.childText}
onClick={e => {
alert("The Child button data is: " + child.childText + " - " + child.childNumber);
alert("The Child HTML is: " + e.target.outerHTML);
}}
/>
))}
</div>
)
JsFiddle
PERF WARNING (apply to ES5/ES6): if you are using PureComponent or shouldComponentUpdate, the above implementations will not be optimized by default because using onClick={e => doSomething()}, or binding directly during the render phase, because it will create a new function everytime the parent renders. If this is a perf bottleneck in your app, you can pass the data to the children, and reinject it inside "stable" callback (set on the parent class, and binded to this in class constructor) so that PureComponent optimization can kick in, or you can implement your own shouldComponentUpdate and ignore the callback in the props comparison check.
You can also use Recompose library, which provide higher order components to achieve fine-tuned optimisations:
// A component that is expensive to render
const ExpensiveComponent = ({ propA, propB }) => {...}
// Optimized version of same component, using shallow comparison of props
// Same effect as React's PureRenderMixin
const OptimizedComponent = pure(ExpensiveComponent)
// Even more optimized: only updates if specific prop keys have changed
const HyperOptimizedComponent = onlyUpdateForKeys(['propA', 'propB'])(ExpensiveComponent)
In this case you could optimize the Child component by using:
const OptimizedChild = onlyUpdateForKeys(['text'])(Child)
Update (9/1/15): The OP has made this question a bit of a moving target. It’s been updated again. So, I feel responsible to update my reply.
First, an answer to your provided example:
Yes, this is possible.
You can solve this by updating Child’s onClick to be this.props.onClick.bind(null, this):
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <a onClick={this.props.onClick.bind(null, this)}>Click me</a>;
}
});
The event handler in your Parent can then access the component and event like so:
onClick: function (component, event) {
// console.log(component, event);
},
JSBin snapshot
But the question itself is misleading
Parent already knows Child’s props.
This isn’t clear in the provided example because no props are actually being provided. This sample code might better support the question being asked:
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <a onClick={this.props.onClick}> {this.props.text} </a>;
}
});
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return { text: "Click here" };
},
onClick: function (event) {
// event.component.props ?why is this not available?
},
render: function() {
return <Child onClick={this.onClick} text={this.state.text} />;
}
});
It becomes much clearer in this example that you already know what the props of Child are.
JSBin snapshot
If it’s truly about using a Child’s props…
If it’s truly about using a Child’s props, you can avoid any hookup with Child altogether.
JSX has a spread attributes API I often use on components like Child. It takes all the props and applies them to a component. Child would look like this:
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return <a {...this.props}> {this.props.text} </a>;
}
});
Allowing you to use the values directly in the Parent:
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return { text: "Click here" };
},
onClick: function (text) {
alert(text);
},
render: function() {
return <Child onClick={this.onClick.bind(null, this.state.text)} text={this.state.text} />;
}
});
JSBin snapshot
And there's no additional configuration required as you hookup additional Child components
var Parent = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return {
text: "Click here",
text2: "No, Click here",
};
},
onClick: function (text) {
alert(text);
},
render: function() {
return <div>
<Child onClick={this.onClick.bind(null, this.state.text)} text={this.state.text} />
<Child onClick={this.onClick.bind(null, this.state.text2)} text={this.state.text2} />
</div>;
}
});
JSBin snapshot
But I suspect that’s not your actual use case. So let’s dig further…
A robust practical example
The generic nature of the provided example is a hard to talk about. I’ve created a component that demonstrations a practical use for the question above, implemented in a very Reacty way:
DTServiceCalculator working example
DTServiceCalculator repo
This component is a simple service calculator. You provide it with a list of services (with names and prices) and it will calculate a total the selected prices.
Children are blissfully ignorant
ServiceItem is the child-component in this example. It doesn’t have many opinions about the outside world. It requires a few props, one of which is a function to be called when clicked.
<div onClick={this.props.handleClick.bind(this.props.index)} />
It does nothing but to call the provided handleClick callback with the provided index[source].
Parents are Children
DTServicesCalculator is the parent-component is this example. It’s also a child. Let’s look.
DTServiceCalculator creates a list of child-component (ServiceItems) and provides them with props [source]. It’s the parent-component of ServiceItem but it`s the child-component of the component passing it the list. It doesn't own the data. So it again delegates handling of the component to its parent-component source
<ServiceItem chosen={chosen} index={i} key={id} price={price} name={name} onSelect={this.props.handleServiceItem} />
handleServiceItem captures the index, passed from the child, and provides it to its parent [source]
handleServiceClick (index) {
this.props.onSelect(index);
}
Owners know everything
The concept of “Ownership” is an important one in React. I recommend reading more about it here.
In the example I’ve shown, I keep delegating handling of an event up the component tree until we get to the component that owns the state.
When we finally get there, we handle the state selection/deselection like so [source]:
handleSelect (index) {
let services = […this.state.services];
services[index].chosen = (services[index].chosen) ? false : true;
this.setState({ services: services });
}
Conclusion
Try keeping your outer-most components as opaque as possible. Strive to make sure that they have very few preferences about how a parent-component might choose to implement them.
Keep aware of who owns the data you are manipulating. In most cases, you will need to delegate event handling up the tree to the component that owns that state.
Aside: The Flux pattern is a good way to reduce this type of necessary hookup in apps.
It appears there's a simple answer. Consider this:
var Child = React.createClass({
render: function() {
<a onClick={this.props.onClick.bind(null, this)}>Click me</a>
}
});
var Parent = React.createClass({
onClick: function(component, event) {
component.props // #=> {Object...}
},
render: function() {
<Child onClick={this.onClick} />
}
});
The key is calling bind(null, this) on the this.props.onClick event, passed from the parent. Now, the onClick function accepts arguments component, AND event. I think that's the best of all worlds.
UPDATE: 9/1/2015
This was a bad idea: letting child implementation details leak in to the parent was never a good path. See Sebastien Lorber's answer.
The question is how to pass argument from child to parent component. This example is easy to use and tested:
//Child component
class Child extends React.Component {
render() {
var handleToUpdate = this.props.handleToUpdate;
return (<div><button onClick={() => handleToUpdate('someVar')}>Push me</button></div>
)
}
}
//Parent component
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate.bind(this);
}
handleToUpdate(someArg){
alert('We pass argument from Child to Parent: \n' + someArg);
}
render() {
var handleToUpdate = this.handleToUpdate;
return (<div>
<Child handleToUpdate = {handleToUpdate.bind(this)} />
</div>)
}
}
if(document.querySelector("#demo")){
ReactDOM.render(
<Parent />,
document.querySelector("#demo")
);
}
Look at JSFIDDLE
Basically you use props to send information to and from Child and Parent.
Adding to all the wonderful answers, let me give a simple example that explains passing values from child to parent component in React
App.js
class App extends React.Component {
constructor(){
super();
this.handleFilterUpdate = this.handleFilterUpdate.bind(this);
this.state={name:'igi'}
}
handleFilterUpdate(filterValue) {
this.setState({
name: filterValue
});
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Header change={this.handleFilterUpdate} name={this.state.name} />
<p>{this.state.name}</p>
</div>
);
}
}
Header.js
class Header extends React.Component {
constructor(){
super();
this.state={
names: 'jessy'
}
}
Change(event) {
// this.props.change(this.state.names);
this.props.change('jessy');
}
render() {
return (
<button onClick={this.Change.bind(this)}>click</button>
);
}
}
Main.js
import React from 'react';
import ReactDOM from 'react-dom';
import App from './App.jsx';
ReactDOM.render(<App />, document.getElementById('app'));
Thats it , now you can pass values from your client to the server.
Take a look at the Change function in the Header.js
Change(event) {
// this.props.change(this.state.names);
this.props.change('jessy');
}
This is how you push values into the props from client to the server
Here is a simple 3 step ES6 implementation using function binding in the parent constructor. This is the first way the official react tutorial recommends (there is also public class fields syntax not covered here). You can find all of this information here https://reactjs.org/docs/handling-events.html
Binding Parent Functions so Children Can Call Them (And pass data up to the parent! :D )
Make sure in the parent constructor you bind the function you created in the parent
Pass the bound function down to the child as a prop (No lambda because we are passing a ref to function)
Call the bound function from a child event (Lambda! We're calling the function when the event is fired.
If we don't do this the function will automatically run on load and not be triggered on the event.)
Parent Function
handleFilterApply(filterVals){}
Parent Constructor
this.handleFilterApply = this.handleFilterApply.bind(this);
Prop Passed to Child
onApplyClick = {this.handleFilterApply}
Child Event Call
onClick = {() => {props.onApplyClick(filterVals)}
This is an example without using the onClick event. I simply pass a callback function to the child by props. With that callback the child call also send data back. I was inspired by the examples in the docs.
Small example (this is in a tsx files, so props and states must be declared fully, I deleted some logic out of the components, so it is less code).
*Update: Important is to bind this to the callback, otherwise the callback has the scope of the child and not the parent. Only problem: it is the "old" parent...
SymptomChoser is the parent:
interface SymptomChooserState {
// true when a symptom was pressed can now add more detail
isInDetailMode: boolean
// since when user has this symptoms
sinceDate: Date,
}
class SymptomChooser extends Component<{}, SymptomChooserState> {
state = {
isInDetailMode: false,
sinceDate: new Date()
}
helloParent(symptom: Symptom) {
console.log("This is parent of: ", symptom.props.name);
// TODO enable detail mode
}
render() {
return (
<View>
<Symptom name='Fieber' callback={this.helloParent.bind(this)} />
</View>
);
}
}
Symptom is the child (in the props of the child I declared the callback function, in the function selectedSymptom the callback is called):
interface SymptomProps {
// name of the symptom
name: string,
// callback to notify SymptomChooser about selected Symptom.
callback: (symptom: Symptom) => void
}
class Symptom extends Component<SymptomProps, SymptomState>{
state = {
isSelected: false,
severity: 0
}
selectedSymptom() {
this.setState({ isSelected: true });
this.props.callback(this);
}
render() {
return (
// symptom is not selected
<Button
style={[AppStyle.button]}
onPress={this.selectedSymptom.bind(this)}>
<Text style={[AppStyle.textButton]}>{this.props.name}</Text>
</Button>
);
}
}