I linked my javascript file in one of my HTML pages but I keep getting the error http://localhost:3000/users/javascript/users-edit.js.
Here is my application structure:
app/public/javascript/users-edit.js
app/views/users-edit.handlebars
In my app.js file I have:
app.use(express.static(__dirname + '/public'));
In my users-edit.handlebars file, I clearly link in my .js file:
<script type="text/javascript" src="javascript/users-edit.js"></script>
Note - I have several other handlebars files where I link the .js file in the exact same manner, but they all work.
Can someone help?
You're asking for /users/javascript/users-edit.js but the file is in /javascript/users-edit.js
Presumably when you said src="javascript/users-edit.js" you forgot to take into account the URL of the page including that HTML might not be in the root of the site, and you should have said src="/javascript/users-edit.js" (explicitly starting the URL resolution from the root instead of the current directory).
Related
I have a problem that has been bothering me for a while now. I have a vite-react-typescript project in VSCode, with a link in the index.html page to a webmanifest. This is basically a json file with a different extention.
When I build my app, the index.html output file contains the meta tag, however instead of referencing the path of the .webmanifest file, it has converted the entire file into base64. Because of this some browsers cannot find the .manifest file and therefore the website cannot be installed as a PWA.
I assume the problem/possible solution lies in the compiler/build options of vite, however I don't know how to fix this auto-conversion.
Here is the github repo: https://github.com/PluginDev-A/Website
the compiled index.html file is in the dist directory, the original index.html file is in the main directory. The problem is on line 6 of both files
**It does not matter whether the file-extention is .json or .webmanifest, both urls get converted upon build
That file should be probably placed in public directory because it is:
Never referenced in source code (e.g. robots.txt)
Must retain the exact same file name (without hashing)
And it should be referenced from index.html with absolute path
<link rel="manifest" href="/manifest.webmanifest">
I placed my files as
main
index.html
files
service-worker.js
index.js
mycss.css
where I wants to cache the index.js and mycss.css file which is not working. And due to some constraint, I can't put the service-worker.js in parallel to index.html page
Another approach of solving the problem is to set the Service-Worker-Allowed HTTP response header if the scope of service-worker.js is different from the scope of files it wants to work with. This idea helps in applications where URL rewriting is done or the context path for files is not similar to the actual directory structure.
Absolutely yes. Moreover, it is considered to be a standard practice to place similar/related files in their respective folder.
So, in your index.html you could do something like this:
<body>
<script src="/files/mycss.css"></script>
<script src="/files/index.js"></script>
<script src="/files/service-worker.js"></script>
</body>
Yes you can put your files in different folders.
When you want to "connect" your css to the html the path is:
src="files/mycss.css"
Hope this will help you.
My Javascript wont activate on dreamweaver. I attached it and everything but when i try to call it with script tags it does not appear on my live preview. i have it attached by this code
<script src="file:///C:/Users/Matthew/Desktop/Untitled-2.js" type="text/script"></script>
If someone could please help that would be awesome! :D
Live mode runs Your code in some virtual webserver and it cannot get local js file. Since browser may block resource from sharing (CORS). Think about putting js file to relative to html file and defining relative url to js file. Create js folder near to html file and put js file there and in Your html file define src="js/Untitled-2.js" – num8er 12 mins ago
Thanks Num8er
In my opinion, it is best practice to keep all files relative to the project. This means setting up a project folder and keeping files organised in sub-folders.
Consider this project structure:
Project folder
CSS folder
style.css
Javascript folder
script.js
Images folder
image.jpg
index.html
The sub-folders are directly children of the project folder, and inside each folder is the corresponding files.
The html file is also a direct child of the project folder (it's not in any other folder).
This means all the related files are relative to the html file.
So in your html file, you can link up these files easier.
<link href="CSS/style.css" rel="stylesheet">
<script src="Javascript/script.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<img src="Images/image.jpg">
As you can see all the files are linked without a full path, this is called relative linking. Absolute linking is the opposite in which you specify the full path, such like you are doing at the moment:
<script src="file:///C:/Users/Matthew/Desktop/Untitled-2.js" type="text/script"></script>
This is good in certain places, however you should always try to aim for relative linking. If you follow this, you shouldn't have any more problems.
I am testing my website code, and I have the following folders in my working directory:
css
js
img
html (contains index.html)
When I try to bring up my website locally (the "index.html" inside of the html folder), none of the css or js files were found (404 Error).
However, before I made an html folder everything was linked together fine, and my file setup looked like this:
css
js
img
index.html
Also, when I created an "html" folder and put "index.html" inside of it, I changed the html code so that it would refer to the other files appropriately (from what I've seen on various websites):
<link href="../css/my_styles.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="../js/touch_functionality.js"></script>
<img src="../img/display_photo.jpg" alt="Display Photo">
Additional Information:
I am using a local Apache server to access the "index.html" file, and I have set the DocumentRoot for the VirtualHost I made to the "/html" folder.
Additionally, I thought this may have been a permissions error, but I downloaded Cygwin and I used "chmod 711" on all of the folders in my working directory and I have used "chmod 644" on the "index.html" file inside of the html folder, but the files still wouldn't be found.
I've done my research on this for quite a few hours, but unfortunately I haven't come across a solution for this yet. Any help would be much appreciated, thank you.
Update
If I change the DocumentRoot to where all of my working space directory (instead of html) and place a .php file that simply contains the following line of code:
<?php require("html/index.html"); ?>
where my folders reside so my working directory looking like this:
-css
-js
-img
-html (contains index.html)
-index.php
Everything will work correctly. However, I would have to believe there is a way so that I don't have to do this "work-around" method. Any insight would be incredibly helpful, thanks again.
The reason being is that the web server only allows one to view files in the html directory or below.
Otherwise it will somebody to access any part of your file system.
Would you like that?
To fix this go back to the configuration that works,
I have a node.js file server running which (when visited) returns a html content. Also in the same directory of the node.js file, there is a javascript file called test.js. Also in the html content being returned, I need to load that javascript file. However in the html content, being returned, which comes out to be called index.html, the script looks like
<script type="text/javascript" src="test.js"></script>
But the server isn't sending the test.js file, its only sending the index.html file, and the script link is loading it relatively from the same directory.
Now I don't want to give the url to the test.js file. I want the node.js file to also send the test.js file, so that it ends up in the same directory as index.html. And then index.html can load it from the same directory.
Is there a way I can specify in the node.js with code to also send the test.js file?
Thanks.
Are you familiar with Express, as dandavis mentioned? Express allows you to set a directory for your static files. See my standard config below:
app
.use('view engine', jade)
.use(express.compress())
.use(express.limit('10mb'))
.use(express.bodyParser())
.use(app.router)
.use(stylus.middleware({
src: __dirname + '/www',
compile: function(str, path) {
return stylus(str)
.set('filename', path)
.set('compress', false)
.set('warn', true);
}
}))
.use(express.static(__dirname + '/www'))
.use(express.logger());
The important part here is second from the bottom. Essentially, Express now knows to look for any assets you specify in your HTML within that static directory. For me, I create a folder titled WWW within my server folder, then add to it my JS, CSS, and images.
For example, say I create the "stylus" folder within my WWW folder, and add to it store.css. My link to that CSS asset would be the following in my Jade template:
link(rel="stylesheet", type="text/css", href="stylus/store.css")
Express knows to look for that asset relative to the __dirname + '/www' path, and thus locates the "stylus" folder and the CSS assets it contains. Hope this helps, and that I haven't ventured away from your intent!