I'm trying to do the following:
When a user accesses "localhost/people/:id", the information about the respective person is taken from a MongoDB and displayed via Angular.
I have my api, which works perfectly fine, I've double-checked.
I'm using the latest AngularJS (1.4.9) and the new Router (angular-new-router or ngNewRouter).
I have an Angular module:
var personModule = angular.module('app.personDetailed', []);
a factory:
personModule.factory('personService', ['$http', function($http) {
return {
get : function(id) {
return $http.get('/api/people/' + id);
}
}
}]);
and a controller:
personModule.controller('PersonDetailedController', ['$routeParams', '$scope', 'personService', PersonDetailedController]);
function PersonDetailedController($routeParams, $scope, personService) {
var id = $routeParams.id;
personService.get(id).then(function(res) {
$scope.item = res.data;
});
}
This all should be displayed in this view:
<div data-ng-controller="PersonDetailedController">
<h2>{{ item }}</h2>
</div>
(yes, I'm not bothering trying to parse json yet).
The problem is, I am unable to use both $scope and $routeParams at the same time. I can only have one or the other. If I use both, the $scope works fine, but the $routeParams is empty.
Here's the main controller, just in case:
var appModule = angular.module('app', ['app.main', 'app.personDetailed', 'ngNewRouter', 'ngResource']);
appModule.controller('AppController', ['$router', AppController]);
function AppController($router) {
$router.config([
{ path: '/', component: 'main'}
{ path: '/people/:id', component: 'personDetailed'}
]);
}
Seems the new router does away with $scope and binds to the controller instance in the template instead.
Looks like you should use this instead
personModule.controller('PersonDetailedController', ['$routeParams', 'personService', PersonDetailedController]);
function PersonDetailedController($routeParams, personService) {
var personDetailed = this,
id = $routeParams.id;
personService.get(id).then(function(res) {
personDetailed.item = res.data;
});
}
and your view (do not use ng-controller)
<h2>{{ personDetailed.item }}</h2>
Related
I have an angular component (vendor-filters) that I would like to pass data to and from a parent controller. The purpose is to create a filter off of mainInfo, and pass that data back to the parent controller where it will reflect the filtering in the component. My problem is that this mainInfo variable is returning undefined in the component controller. Here's my code :
html
<div ng-controller="kanban as ctrl">
<vendor-filters mainInfo="ctrl.mainInfo"></vendor-filters>
<div class="qt-kb">
<kanban-list label="Incoming" type="incoming" cards="ctrl.mainInfo.incoming"></kanban-list>
<kanban-list label="In Progress" type="progress" cards="ctrl.mainInfo.inProgress"></kanban-list>
<kanban-list label="Waiting For Documentation" type="docs" cards="ctrl.mainInfo.documentation"></kanban-list>
<kanban-list label="Pending Approval" type="closed" cards="ctrl.mainInfo.closed"></kanban-list>
</div>
Parent Controller :
app.controller("kanban", ["$scope", "assignmentDataService", "globalSpinner", function ($scope, assignmentDataService, globalSpinner) {
const vm = this;
vm.mainInfo = [];
activate();
function activate() {
getData();
}
function getData() {
var promise = assignmentDataService.getData()
.then(function(data) {
vm.mainInfo = data;
});
globalSpinner.register(promise);
};
}]);
Component controller:
class VendorFilterCtrl {
constructor($http, $scope, $timeout,assignmentDataService) {
this.$scope = $scope
this.$http = $http;
const vm = this;
//I could be initializing this wrong but this is where I'm trying to get
//the data.
vm.data = vm.mainInfo;
}
app.controller('kanban').component("vendorFilters", {
templateUrl: "app/components/vendorFilters.html",
bindings: {
store: "=?store",
onChange: '&',
mainInfo: '<'
},
controller: VendorFilterCtrl,
controllerAs: "ctrl",
bindToController: true
});
Basically I'm trying to get the mainInfo from the parent controller into the component and visa versa. Any idea why this isn't working?
Start by using kebab-case for the attribute:
<vendor-filters ̶m̶a̶i̶n̶I̶n̶f̶o̶ main-info="ctrl.mainInfo"></vendor-filters>
NEXT
Fix this:
app ̶.̶c̶o̶n̶t̶r̶o̶l̶l̶e̶r̶(̶'̶k̶a̶n̶b̶a̶n̶'̶)̶ .component("vendorFilters", {
I wish to pass a param from one store-state to the display product info in products-state:
My app - storeApp
.config(['$stateProvider', function($stateProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state('store', {
url: '/store',
templateUrl: 'store/store',
controller: 'storeCtrl'
})
.state('products', {
url: '/products/:productSku',
templateUrl: 'store/product',
controller: 'productCtrl',
resolve: {
productResource: 'productFactory',
_product: function(productResource, $stateParams){
return productResource.getProduct($stateParams.productSku);
}
}
Store.jade
a(href='/products/{{product.sku}}')
Product controller
.controller("productCtrl", function ($rootScope, $http, $stateParams, productFactory, storeFactory) {
//.controller('productCtrl', ['_product', function ($scope, $rootScope, storeFactory, _product) {
console.log($stateParams.productSku);
Product Factory
function getProduct(sku) {
return $http.get('http://localhost:3000/api/products/' + sku );
}
Since I am using MEAN Stack, node has the router attached to express:
Server.js
const storeController = require('./controllers/store');
server.get('/store/product', passportConfig.isAuthenticated, storeController.getProductPage);
Store.js
exports.getProductPage = (req, res) => {
res.render('store/product', {
title: 'PP',
angularApp: 'storeApp'
})
}
I tried returning _product but I get Unknown provider: _productProvider <- _product <- productCtrl
I tried using ui-sref - a(ui-sref="products({productSku:'{{product.sku}}'})") in store.jade to send param from store_State to products_State & finally got an object back from API.
Now the issue is that node will not return the view.
Basically what I am trying to achieve is:
Node serving client views, all store views - store/ product/ cart are attached to angular app served through Server.js, Clicking store product will redirect to product page after resolve product info from api.
I am getting product info but not getting product view.
I looked it up but all solutions did not work....maybe my bad :-(
How can I go about this?
UPDATE-1: this is whats happening:
UPDATE-2:
When I pass the control to angular, I have express routing the menu, and angular stateProvider routing/ connecting views to controllers.
Main view that loads is the store itself:
app.js - store route
$stateProvider
.state('store', {
url: '/store',
templateUrl: 'store/store',
controller: 'storeCtrl'
})
server.js (express)
server.get('/store', passportConfig.isAuthenticated, storeController.getStorePage);
store.js
exports.getStorePage = (req, res) => {
res.render('store/store', {
title: 'S--tore',
angularApp: 'storeApp'
});
}
store.ctr.js
angular.module("storeApp")
.controller("storeCtrl", function($rootScope, $http, storeFactory) {
var products;
storeFactory.getProducts().then(function(_products) {
products = _products.data;
$rootScope.products = products;
});
That loads just fine!
But when I try to send the param productSku from store view to product view and have the resolve send product params back to product view that where it stops working, it's either I get the view OR i get the params.
I tried different ways of resolve, they all result the same - view OR product params.
app.js - product route
.state('products', {
url: '/products/:productSku',
templateUrl: 'store/product',
controller: 'productCtrl',
resolve: {
_product: function ($stateParams, $state, $http) {
return $http.get('http://localhost:3000/api/products/' + $stateParams.productSku );
//return productResource.getProduct($stateParams.productSku)
}
}
})
If I remove the resolve and send a(href='/products/{{product.sku}}') from store.jade I get the template in the route, chrome console error I get is `Error: $injector:unpr Unknown Provider _product <- productCtrl
product.ctr.js
.controller('productCtrl', ['_product', function ($rootScope, $http, $stateParams, productFactory, storeFactory, _product) {
If I send a(ui-sref="products({productSku: product.sku })") with resolve I get product params (shown in WebStorem snapshot above) NO view.
angular will not load jade templates, You will need an html template, The jade template is loaded by express. You might like to try using ui-view like this:
Store.jade
div(ui-view)
a(href='/products/{{product.sku}}')
Which should make angular look for the unnamed view when loading the route.
Your templateUrl's don't look to be pointing to files, perhaps you're missing the file extension?
Make sure you return a $promise in resolve as ui-router waits until they are resolved before rendering the view.
I'd recommend having named views with corresponding config in route too:
.state('store', {
url: '/store',
views: {
'#': {
templateUrl: 'store/store.html',
controller: 'storeCtrl'
}
}
})
.state('products', {
url: '/products/:productSku',
templateUrl: 'store/product',
controller: 'productCtrl',
resolve: {
_product: function ($stateParams, $state, $http) {
return $http.get('http://localhost:3000/api/products/' + $stateParams.productSku ).$promise;
}
}
})
See the docs here: https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/wiki/Multiple-Named-Views
This is the solution I found:
store.jade
a(href='/products/{{product.sku}}' ng-click='sku(product.sku)')
stroe.ctr.js
$rootScope.sku = function(value){
storeFactory.singleProduct.productSku = value;
storeFactory.singleProduct.saveSku();
}
store.fac.js
var singleProduct = {
productSku : '',
saveSku: function() {
sessionStorage.productSku = angular.toJson(singleProduct.productSku);
},
getSku: function() {
singleProduct.productSku = angular.fromJson(sessionStorage.productSku);
return singleProduct.productSku;
}
}
product.ctr.js
var sp = storeFactory.singleProduct.getSku();
productFactory.getProduct(sp).then(function (product) {
$rootScope.product = product.data;
});
product.fac.js
function getProduct(sku) {
return $http.get('http://localhost:3000/api/products/' + sku );
}
Basically I am storing productSku to sessionStorage and getting it back from there when product.jade view loads...
Thanx to all who tried...
You can pass it as $state.data in your controller.
toState = $state.get("some-state");
toState.data.foo = $scope.foo;
$state.go(toState);
You have not included dependancy of _products in storeCtrl. When you call that service you get an error.
Correct code is:
angular.module("storeApp")
.controller("storeCtrl", function($rootScope, $http, storeFactory, _products) {
var products;
storeFactory.getProducts().then(function(_products) {
products = _products.data;
$rootScope.products = products;
});
You can use console.log("something here" + _products.data); to see in your browser console
I'm fairly new to Angular and I'm wondering how to go about creating a list/detail view using Angular routes as what I currently have doesn't seem to be working.
The app has a list of 'projects' and when you click on a project you see a detailed view of that selected project, standard stuff. I've got this working using ng-switch but ideally I want to use seperate routes for the list/detail views. I've read that for this I'm going to need to use a factory method but I'm having difficulty passing the selected data between the routes. Here's what I have:
app.factory('Project', [ function ($rootScope) {
var _selectedProject = {};
_selectedProject.project = {};
return _selectedProject;
}]);
app.controller('GalleryController', ['$scope', function ($scope, _selectedProject) {
$scope.sharedProject = _selectedProject || {};
$scope.selectProject = function (proj) {
_selectedProject.project = proj;
};
$scope.$watch('sharedProject', function (proj) {
$scope.chosenProject = proj;
})
}]);
I'm actually getting cannot set property 'property' of undefined which is inside $scope.selectedProject.
A nice solution for this is ui-router.
ui-router allows the nesting of states which correspond to controllers, urls and html templates.
In your example I would do the following:
Install ui-router (described in the link above)
Apply a configuration as follows:
myApp.config(function($stateProvider, $urlRouterProvider) {
$stateProvider
.state('project', {
url: "/project",
templateUrl: "partials/project/list.html",
controller: project_list_controller
})
.state('project.details', {
url: "/details",
templateUrl: "partials/project/details.html",
controller: project_detail_controller
})
}
Split your current controller into a project list controller and a project details controller.
Finally I would use a service to store your selectedProject as its a singleton, see the correct useage and differences between services and factories in this helpful blog post
Hope this helps.
You named your factory Project but are using _selectedProject as the injection to controller. You also didn't include it in the injection array
Controller should look more like:
app.controller('GalleryController', ['$scope','Project', function ($scope, Project) {
$scope.sharedProject = Project || {};
$scope.selectProject = function (proj) {
Project.project = proj;
};
$scope.$watch('sharedProject', function (proj) {
$scope.chosenProject = proj;
});
}]);
I've been doing quite a lot of reading about angular dependency injection and factories vs services etc like in this post here - angular.service vs angular.factory
I'm struggling putting it into practise and wonder if you can give me suggestions on how you would do it.
My current code looks like this
var app = angular.module("martysCoolApp", ['firebase', 'ngRoute'])
function mainController($scope, $firebase) {
var db = new Firebase("https://**.firebaseio.com/");
$scope.messages = $firebase(db);
$scope.addItem = function(error) {
if (error.keyCode != 13) return;
$scope.messages.$add({ name: $scope.name, price: $scope.price });
$scope.name = "";
$scope.price = "";
};
}
I decided I wanted to use angular routes and split this basic function up into two different controllers that I would use for my test app. the MainController would just display everything in the firebase db and the AdminController would be able to add messages to it
var app = angular.module("martysCoolApp", ['firebase', 'ngRoute'])
.factory('fireBaseConnectionService', $firebase)
//code in here to connect to firebase and add messages
.controller('MainController', function(fireBaseConnectionService, $scope, $route, $routeParams, $location) {
$scope.$route = $route;
$scope.$location = $location;
$scope.$routeParams = $routeParams;
//code here to retrieve everything from firebase db
})
.controller('AdminController', function(fireBaseConnectionService, $scope, $routeParams) {
$scope.name = "AdminController";
$scope.params = $routeParams;
//code here to add a row to the db
})
.config(function($routeProvider, $locationProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/', {
redirectTo: '/menu'
})
.when('/menu', {
path: '/menu',
templateUrl: 'partials/menu.html',
controller: 'MainController'
})
.when('/admin', {
templateUrl: 'partials/admin.html',
controller: 'AdminController'
})
.otherwise({
redirectTo: '/'
});
$locationProvider.html5Mode(false);
});
My problem is I don't want to have to connect to the firebase db in each controller. I would like to have a factory that handles this for me and has maybe functions within that that I can call from my controllers to view everything in db and to add something to the db
factory()
As we’ve seen, the factory() method is a quick way to create and configure a service.
The factory() function takes two arguments:
• name (string)
This argument takes the name of the service we want to register.
• getFn (function)
This function runs when Angular creates the service.
angular.module('myApp')
.factory('myService', function() {
return {
'username': 'auser'
}
});
The getFn will be invoked once for the duration of the app lifecycle, as the service is a singleton
object. As with other Angular services, when we define our service, getFn can take an array or a
function that will take other injectable objects.
The getFn function can return anything from a primitive value to a function to an object (similar to
the value() function).
angular.module('myApp')
.factory('githubService', [
'$http', function($http) {
return {
getUserEvents: function(username) {
// ...
}
}
}]);
service()
If we want to register an instance of a service using a constructor function, we can use service(),
which enables us to register a constructor function for our service object.
The service() method takes two arguments:
• name (string)
This argument takes the name of the service instance we want to register.
• constructor (function)
Here is the constructor function that we’ll call to instantiate the instance.
The service() function will instantiate the instance using the new keyword when creating the
instance.
var Person = function($http) {
this.getName = function() {
return $http({
method: 'GET',
url: '/api/user'
});
};
};
angular.service('personService', Person);
provider
These factories are all created through the $provide service, which is responsible for instantiating
these providers at run time.
angular.module('myApp')
.factory('myService', function() {
return {
'username': 'auser'
}
})
// This is equivalent to the
// above use of factory
.provider('myService', {
$get: function() {
return {
'username': 'auser'
}
}
});
Why would we ever need to use the .provider() method when we can just use the .factory()
method?
The answer lies in whether we need the ability to externally configure a service returned by the
.provider() method using the Angular .config() function. Unlike the other methods of service
creation, we can inject a special attribute into the config() method.
from ng-book
All you have to do is just move the firebase connection into the service, and inject that service wherever you want . The connection line will execute the first time your app runs, given that you front load the service when your app runs, as you seem to be doing now:
.factory('fireBaseConnectionService', function($firebase){
var db = $firebase(new Firebase("https://**.firebaseio.com/"));//creating
//the firebase connection this line executes only once when the service is loaded
return{
getMessage:function(){
return db.whatever;
}
}
})
If you load the service script dynamically, on route where you need it, it will only connect to the database when it reaches that route. The code above will create one connection to the database, as the connection line is executed only once.
Just for anyone interested with the help of the answers above and this link - Firebase _ AngularJS this is what I ended up doing
var app = angular.module("martysCoolApp", ['firebase', 'ngRoute'])
.factory('fireBaseConnectionService', ["$firebase", function($firebase) {
var db = new Firebase("https://***.firebaseio.com/");
return {
getMessages: function() {
return $firebase(db);
},
addMessage: function(message) {
var messages = $firebase(db);
messages.$add(message);
}
}
}])
.controller('MainController', ["fireBaseConnectionService", "$scope", function (fireBaseConnectionService, $scope, $route, $routeParams, $location) {
$scope.$route = $route;
$scope.$location = $location;
$scope.$routeParams = $routeParams;
$scope.messages = fireBaseConnectionService.getMessages();
}])
.controller('AdminController', ["fireBaseConnectionService", "$scope", function(fireBaseConnectionService, $scope, $routeParams) {
$scope.name = "AdminController";
$scope.params = $routeParams;
$scope.addItem = function(error) {
if (error.keyCode != 13) return;
fireBaseConnectionService.addMessage({ name: $scope.name, price: $scope.price });
$scope.name = "";
$scope.price = "";
}
}])
.config(function($routeProvider, $locationProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/', {
redirectTo: '/menu'
})
.when('/menu', {
path: '/menu',
templateUrl: 'partials/menu.html',
controller: 'MainController'
})
.when('/admin', {
templateUrl: 'partials/admin.html',
controller: 'AdminController'
})
.otherwise({
redirectTo: '/'
});
$locationProvider.html5Mode(false);
});
I am using AngularJS and I don't manage to bind properly models that need time to load. I have this service called ListService:
angular.module('3pix').factory('ListService', ['$q', '$timeout', 'underscore', 'Item', 'ItemResource',
function ($q, $timeout, _, Item, ItemResource) {
var List = function () {
};
_.extend(List.prototype, {
_addItem: function(item) {
this.items || (this.items = []);
this.items.push(item);
},
loadItems: function() {
var scope = this;
var deferred = $q.defer();
ItemResource.get_items({id: 39}, function(itemsData) {
itemsData.forEach(function(itemData) {
scope._addItem(new Item(itemData));
});
deferred.resolve(scope.items);
});
return deferred.promise;
}
});
return List;
}]);
My real ListService is far more complicated than this but I copied only the relevant parts so I can ask my question clearly.
My controller called ListController and it gets a 'list' from the router using 'resolve' option:
angular.module('3pix').controller('ListController', ['$scope', 'jquery', 'list',
function ($scope, $, list) {
$scope.list = list; //<-------- Here I got the list, I get it fine from the router
list.loadItems(); //<------- Here I load the list's items
}]);
In my view I have:
<div class="item-wrapper"
ng-repeat="item in list.items">
{{item}}
</div>
My problem is that after the items are loaded in the controller, the view doesn't displays the items and keeps drawing nothing. I tried to wrap the loadItems's success method in $timeout and $rootScope.$apply but it doesn't help. Any idea how to solve it?
UPDATE
I followed the advice of #Chandermani and I did in my controller:
list.loadItems().then(function() {
$scope.items = list.items;
});
The items are loaded in the view, but still, sometimes, when I update list.items using _addItem() method, nothing happen and the view doesn't show the new items. I tried to wrap _addItem() with $timeout as follows but it didn't helped either:
_addItem: function(item) {
$timeout(function() {
this.items || (this.items = []);
this.items.push(item);
});
}
I think the problem is that you are assigning the scope list to the service instance instead of the method result.
Change it to
angular.module('3pix').controller('ListController', ['$scope', 'jquery', 'list',
function ($scope, $, list) {
$scope.list = list.loadItems()
}]);
Also can you try this in html
ng-repeat="item in list"