I'm parsing a fairly large JSON file and doing some key:value pairs within an object. Issue I'm having is if I find a key I need to actually add another object to it INSTEAD of writing over it.
Example:
var collection = {};
angular.forEach(things, function(thing) {
collection[thing.Id] = thing.stuff;
//thing.stuff is an object
});
Came to a conclusion after some of the comments I've received in the first post:
var collection = {};
angular.forEach(things, function(thing) {
if(collection[thing.Id]){
//Key Exists push into array
collection[thing.Id].push(thing.stuff);
}else{
//Key doesn't exist create array for object
collection[thing.Id] = [thing.stuff];
}
});
In Modern way: maybe someone will come in handy
var collection = {};
angular.forEach(things, function(thing) {
if(!collection[thing.Id]){
collection[thing.Id] = [];
}
collection[thing.Id] = [...collection[thing.Id], thing.stuff];
// or ----------------------------------------------------
// add item at start
// collection[thing.Id] = [thing.stuff, ...collection[thing.Id]];
// or ---------------------------------------------
// if you doesn't want to change referrance every time
// collection[thing.Id].push(thing.stuff);
});
Related
Im using the following code,
jQuery.each(aDataSel, function(index, oData) {
oPushedObject = {};
aSelectedDataSet.push(fnCreateEnt(aProp, oData, oPushedObject));
});
This is aSelectedDataSet values
and this is the values of OData
What I need is that before I do the push is to fill the listTypeGroup & listTypeGroupDescription (with the red arrow ) with values that Are inside the oData -> ListTypeGroupAssigment -> result (listTypeGroup & listTypeGroupDescription) , The index is relevant since I want to add just the value of the index in each iteration (since this code is called inside outer loop and the index determine the current step of the loop) ,How it can be done nicely?
The result contain 100 entries (always) and the a selected data will have 100 entries at the end...
Update :)
Just to be clear In the pic I show the values which is hardcoded for this run but the values can be any values, we just need to find the match between the both objects values...
I mean to find a match between to_ListTypeGroupAssigment in both object (which in this case exist ) and if in oData there is result bigger then one entry start with the matching ...
UPDATE2 - when I try Dave code the following happen for each entry,
This happen in the Jquery.extend line...any idea how to overcome this?
The following hard-coded of Dave:-) work perfect but I need generic code which doesnt refer to specific field name
jQuery.each(aDataSet, function(index, oData) {
oPushedObject = {};
fnCreatePushedEntry(aProperties, oData, oPushedObject);
var result = oData.to_ListTypeGroupAssignment.results[index];
oPushedObject.to_ListTypeGroupAssignment = {
ListTypeGroup: result.ListTypeGroup,
ListTypeGroupDescription: result.ListTypeGroupDescription
};
aSelectedDataSet.push(oPushedObject);
});
Im stuck :(any idea how to proceed here ?what can be wrong with the extend ?
should I use something else ? Im new to jQuery...:)
I think that this happen(in Dave answer) because the oData[key] is contain the results and not the specified key (the keyValue = to_ListTypeGroupAssignment ) which is correct but we need the value inside the object result per index...
var needValuesForMatch = {
ListTypeGroup: 'undefined',
ListTypeGroupDescription: 'undefined',
}
//Just to show that oPushedObject can contain additional values just for simulation
var temp = {
test: 1
};
//------------------This object to_ListTypeGroupAssigment should be filled (in generic way :) ------
var oPushedObject = {
temp: temp,
to_ListTypeGroupAssignment: needValuesForMatch
};
oPushedObject is one instance in aSelectedDataSet
and after the matching I need to do the follwing:
aSelectedDataSet.push(oPushedObject);
Is this what you're after:
OPTION ONE - DEEP CLONE FROM oData TO aSelectedDataSet
aSelectedDataSet.forEach(function(currentObject,index){
for (var childObject in currentObject) {
if (! currentObject.hasOwnProperty(childObject))
continue;
var objectToClone = oData[childObject]['results'][index];
if(objectToClone)
$.extend(true,currentObject[childObject],objectToClone);
}
});
Here is your data in a fiddle with the function applied: https://jsfiddle.net/hyz0s5fe/
OPTION TWO - DEEP CLONE FROM oData ONLY WHERE PROPERTY EXISTS IN aSelectedDataSet
aSelectedDataSet.forEach(function(currentObject,index){
for (var childObject in currentObject) {
if (! currentObject.hasOwnProperty(childObject))
continue;
if(typeof currentObject[childObject] !== 'object')
continue;
for(var grandChildObject in currentObject[childObject]) {
var objectToClone = oData[childObject]['results'][index][grandChildObject];
if(typeof objectToClone === 'object') {
$.extend(true,currentObject[childObject][grandChildObject],objectToClone);
} else {
currentObject[childObject][grandChildObject] = objectToClone;
}
}
}
Fiddle for option 2: https://jsfiddle.net/4rh6tt25/
If I am understanding you correctly this should just be a small change:
jQuery.each(aDataSel, function(index, oData) {
oPushedObject = {};
fnCreateEnt(aProp, oData, oPushObj);
//get all the properties of oData and clone into matching properties of oPushObj
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(oData).forEach(function(key) {
if (oPushObj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
//oPushObj has a matching property, start creating destination object
oPushObj[key] = {};
var source = oData[key];
var destination = oPushObj[key];
//can safely assume we are copying an object. iterate through source properties
Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source).forEach(function(sourceKey) {
var sourceItem = source[sourceKey];
//handle property differently for arrays
if (Array.isArray(sourceItem)) {
//just copy the array item from the appropriate index
destination[sourceKey] = sourceItem.slice(index, index + 1);
} else {
//use jQuery to make a full clone of sourceItem
destination[sourceKey] = $.extend(true, {}, sourceItem);
}
});
}
});
aSelectedDataSet.push(oPushedObject);
});
It is unclear what exactly your fnCreateEnt() function returns though. I am assuming it is the populated oPushObj but it's not entirely clear from your question.
In my Notes Database, I perform an audit when the document is saved. Pretty easy in LotusScript. I grab the original document (oDoc) from the server, then in the document I modified (mDoc), I do a Forall loop that gets the names of each item; forall item in mDoc.items. Grab the same item from oDoc, execute a function with the new item as an argument that will run down a case statement that will see if its a field we care about. if so, I update a set of list values in the document with "When", "Who", "What field", and the "New Value".
I'm doing this in a server side script. In trying this, I discovered a couple of interesting things;
currentDocument is the NotesXSPDocument that contains everything that was just changed.
currentDocument.getDocument() contains the pre-change values. It also returns a NotesDocument which has the "items" field that I can run through.
Thing is, I need something similar in the NotesXSPDocument. Is there a way in an iterative loop to grab the names and values of all items from there?
Here's the broken code. (Currently it's walking through the NotesDocument items, but those are the old values. I'd rather walk down the XSP document items)
function FInvoice_beginAudit() {
var original_doc:NotesDocument = currentDocument.getDocument();
var oItem:NotesItem;
var oItems:java.util.Vector = original_doc.getItems();
var iterator = oItems.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
var oItem:NotesItem = iterator.next();
item = currentDocument.getItemValue(oItem.getName());
if (oItem == undefined) {
var MasterItem = ScreenAudit(doc,item,True)
if (MasterItem) { return true }
} else {
if (item.getValueString() != oItem.getValueString()) {
var MasterItem = ScreenAudit(doc,Item,True);
if (MasterItem) { return true }
}
}
}
}
You can get both versions of a document after submit - the original and the one with changed/new values:
original: var original_doc:NotesDocument = currentDocument.getDocument();
changed: var changed_doc:NotesDocument = currentDocument.getDocument(true);
This way you can compare the items for changes.
But, there is a pitfall: after assigning "changed_doc" to currentDocument.getDocument(true) the "original_doc" has the changed values too because both variables point to the same document. That's why we have to copy all items from currentDocument.getDocument() to a new temporary document first and only after get the changed values with currentDocument.getDocument(true). As an alternative you could read the original document from server like you do in LotusScript.
This is a code for detecting changed items as a starting point:
var original_doc:NotesDocument = database.createDocument();
currentDocument.getDocument().copyAllItems(original_doc, true);
var changed_doc:NotesDocument = currentDocument.getDocument(true);
var oItems:java.util.Vector = original_doc.getItems();
var iterator = oItems.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
var oItem:NotesItem = iterator.next();
var itemName = oItem.getName();
var cItem:NotesItem = changed_doc.getFirstItem(itemName);
if (cItem.getText() !== oItem.getText()) {
print("changed: " + itemName);
}
oItem.recycle();
cItem.recycle();
}
original_doc.remove(true);
original_doc.recycle();
So, let's say i have object A and object B. Object A has a number of children where object B has a number of children that are the same. How do I find out what are the differences the ones missing in object B and the ones added in object A and then put them into their own object or two-dimensional array.
For example, the first array being those that are added to second, being subracted:
var changes = [["google.com", "yahoo.com"],["facebook.com", "bing.com"]]
I am trying compare a snapshot of stored bookmarks and the current bookmarks list using crossrider.
I believe this is a follow on from the following questions, and so I will combine them all into a single code example that runs in the background scope (background.js):
realtime with non-event programming,
crossrider: store snapshot of bookmarks in local database and compare to current bookmarks list
So for the getChanges function, I prefer to convert the bookmark trees into hash lists and then compare the lists for changes. In the following example, I use createHash to create the hash lists using cloneNode to create a shallow clone of the node objects, and then in getChanges I compare the hash lists for additions, modifications, and deletions:
appAPI.ready(function() {
// Poll every 30 seconds
setInterval(function() {
appAPI.db.async.get('prevBookmarks', function(value) {
// Load or initialize the previous bookmarks list
var prevBookmarks = (value) ? value : {};
// Get current bookmarks
appAPI.bookmarks.getTree(function(nodes) {
// Save bookmark hash for comparison in next interval
appAPI.db.async.set('prevBookmarks', createHash(nodes[0]));
// Get hash list of curent bookmarks
var currBookmarks = createHash(nodes[0]);
// Get changes between the lists
var changes = getChanges(prevBookmarks, currBookmarks);
// Post changes to your API server
appAPI.request.post({
url: http://yourAPIserver.com,
postData: changes,
contentType: 'application/json'
});
});
});
}, 30 * 1000);
// Function to create a hash list from a bookmark tree
function createHash(node) {
var hash = {};
if (typeof node === 'object') hash[node._id] = cloneNode(node);
if (node.isFolder && typeof node.children !== 'undefined' && node.children.length > 0) {
node.children.forEach(function(child) {
var childHash = createHash(child);
for (var key in childHash) {
if (!hash[key]) hash[key] = cloneNode(childHash[key]);
}
});
}
return hash;
}
// Function to create shallow clones of bookmark nodes
function cloneNode(node) {
var clone = appAPI.JSON.parse(appAPI.JSON.stringify(node));
delete clone.children;
delete clone.dateAdded;
return clone;
}
// Get changes between current and previous bookmark hash lists
function getChanges(prev, curr) {
// Initialize return object
var changes = {added:{}, modified:{}, removed:{}};
// Search for added or modified nodes
for (var key in curr) {
if (!prev[key])
changes.added[key] = curr[key];
else if (appAPI.JSON.stringify(prev[key]) !== appAPI.JSON.stringify(curr[key]))
changes.modified[key] = curr[key];
}
// Search for removed nodes
for (var key in prev) {
if (!curr[key])
changes.removed[key] = prev[key];
}
return changes;
}
});
Disclaimer: I am a Crossrider employee
If the two objects to be compared are both one-dimensional arrays, then simply use the set arithmetic functions in Underscore.js, such as _.difference and _.intersection.
Or, use the same logic, which for intersect (unoptimized) is as simple as:
array1.filter(function(v){return array2.indexOf(v)!==-1);});
If you're looking for a generalized way to find the diff between two arbitrary objects of any depth and complexity, this is not a well-defined problem.
I have this JSON
[{"id":7,"serial":"7bc530","randomDouble":0.0,"randomDouble2":0.0,"randomDouble3":0.0,"date":1352228474000,"removed":null},
{"id":8,"serial":"4a18d27","randomDouble":0.0,"randomDouble2":0.0,"randomDouble3":0.0,"date":1352228474000,"removed":null},
{"id":9,"serial":"f30ef","randomDouble":0.0,"randomDouble2":0.0,"randomDouble3":0.0,"date":1352228474000,"removed":null},
{"id":10,"serial":"9e6d","randomDouble":0.0,"randomDouble2":0.0,"randomDouble3":0.0,"date":1352228474000,"removed":null},
{"id":11,"serial":"4d8665a3","randomDouble":0.0,"randomDouble2":0.0,"randomDouble3":0.0,"date":1352228474000,"removed":null},
{"id":12,"serial":"4fe1457","randomDouble":0.0,"randomDouble2":0.0,"randomDouble3":0.0,"date":1352228474000,"removed":null}]
and I have this JSON
{"computers":[{"id":"7bc530","name":"Dell","description":"Dell"},
{"id":"f30ef","name":"HP","description":"HP"},
{"id":"9e6d","name":"Compaq","description":"Compaq"},
{"id":"4d8665a3","name":"Toshiba","description":"Toshiba"},
{"id":"4fe1457","name":"Asus","description":"Asus"},
{"id":"4a18d27","name":"Acer","description":"Acer"}]}
I want to replace the "serial" element in the first JSON with the "Description" in this one. The reason why I need it in one JSON is that I am using a DataTable and I can only pass one JSON in.
I'm not sure how I can do this in Javascript / JQuery?
You can accomplish this without any jQuery by setting up small function:
(see the demo fiddle)
function replaceSerial (data1, data2) {
var descs = {}, computers = data2['computers'], final = data1;
for (var i = 0; i < computers.length; i++ ) {
descs[computers[i]['id']] = computers[i]['description'];
}
for (var i = 0; i < data1.length; i++) {
final[i]['serial'] = descs[data1[i]['serial']];
}
return final;
}
Then just save your two pieces of JSON into variables and invoke the function:
var json1, json2, mergedJson;
json1 = // DATA IN FIRST JSON;
json2 = // DATA IN SECOND JSON;
mergedJson = replaceSerial (json1, json2);
Assuming your first object is called to and the second object is called from
// Iterate over each entry in to
to.forEach(function(value) {
// In each iteration find elements in from where the id is the same
// as the serial of the current value of to
var description = from.computers.filter(function(element){
if (element.id == value.serial) return true;
});
// Copy description of first found object in the description property of
// the current object
value.description = description[0].description;
// Unset serial?
delete value.serial;
});
DEMO
I've been trying to work with Trello and the Google Apps Script this week. I am trying to create an array of hashes that I can then use to load the spreadsheet. Google apps script doesn't like the typical javascript code of creating hashes. I've looked up the docs but they don't have anything like hashes...they say to:
var object = [];
var object1 = {};
object.push(object1);
This wont work because I'm essentially trying to do something like:
var hash={name: , label: };
var n= someNumber;
var l= someLabel
var hash.push(name: n, label: l);
Essentially that is the code I have right now. But here is my entire function:
function getData(){
var list={};
//get the list of delivered cards from Trello
var listRequest = authorizeToTrello(); // get authorization
var result = UrlFetchApp.fetch("https://trello.com/1/lists/4fea3a2c3a7038911ebff2d8/cards",
listRequest);//fetch list
var listOfCards = Utilities.jsonParse(result.getContentText());//Google app utility format json
//outer loop to iterate through list of Cards
for(var i=0; i < listOfCards.length; i++){
var cardId = listOfCards[i].id; //get the id of a single card
var l = listOfCards[i]["label"]; //get the label for the our structure
//get a json object for a single card within the list of cards iteration
var cardRequest = authorizeToTrello();
var getCard = UrlFetchApp.fetch("https://trello.com/1/cards/" + cardId + "/actions", cardRequest);
var singleCard = Utilities.jsonParse(getCard.getContentText());
//inner loop to iterate the single cards JSON objects
for(var j=0; j < singleCard.length; j++) {
if(singleCard[j].data != undefined && singleCard[j].data.listAfter != undefined)
{
var str = singleCard[j]["data"]["listAfter"]['name'];
if(str === "Delivered Q3 2012"){
var n = singleCard[j]['memberCreator']['fullName'];
}
}
}
//push the data to list
list.push(n,l);
}
return name, label; //return list for output
}
Reading the question, I understood that the author needs to know how to create an associative array in a GAS. If it is correct then here is a couple of links (here and here) and a sample code is bellow.
function testMap() {
var map = {};
map["name1"] = "value1";
map["name2"] = "value2";
return map;
}
If the author needs really
an array of hashes
then there are a couple of ways depending on which hash algorithm is required.
to use the Utilities.computeDigest method to calculate a hash of a string using one of available algorithms.
if the required hash calculation algorithm is not supported by the Utilities.computeDigest, then is possible to write own implementation as it is done for the BLAKE function.
Here is a sample of how to create an array of hashes using the MD5 hash.
function testHash() {
var array = [];
array.push(Utilities.computeDigest(Utilities.DigestAlgorithm.MD5, "value1"));
array.push(Utilities.computeDigest(Utilities.DigestAlgorithm.MD5, "value2"));
return array;
}
P.S. The return line of the author code return name, label; //return list for output
is not correct - only the label variable value is returned. To return a couple of variables as an array is necessary to write return [name, label];. Or may be the author needs to return the list variable and not name and label.
I know this is an old post / question, but i would like to update my answer since the original anwer (1st answer) is misleading. I was myself looking for how to return associative arrays back to a cell in the spreadsheet, but alas.. "YOU CANNOT". Google spreadsheet MUST want an numerically indexed array or an object. Otherwise it returns "#ERROR".
Here are the steps to replicate the issue.
function testMap() {
var map = {};
map["name1"] = "value1";
map["name2"] = "value2";
return map
Formula in your cell: =testMap()
Value in your cell: Thinking... #ERROR
Solution (rather a workaround)
1: Transfer your objects from your associative array into a numerically indexed array using for-each type loop.
var temp = new Array();
for (var i in map) {
temp.push([i,map[i]])
// optionally use activeSheet.getRange(X:X).setValue([i,map[i]])) function here.
// set values will not work in cell functions. To use it via cell functions, rerun / trigger the functions using an on_edit event.
}
If you used a temp like numerically indexed array, you can return "temp" back to the calling cell.
Summary: For onEdit() purposes, use Cache Service to define associative array data.
Here's a shared Gsheet demonstrating this curious behavior. I tried the following solution in programmatically defining an associative array based on data in a Google sheet.
var assocArr = {
labels: {},
init: function () {
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('sheetName');
var values = sheet.getDataRange().getValues();
for(var row in values) {
assocArr.labels[values[row][0]] = values[row][1];
};
for(var key in assocArr.labels) {
Logger.log("key: %s, value: %s",key, assocArr.labels[key]);
};
return(void(0));
},
};
To execute this, you run the init() method in the onOpen() event handler.
function onOpen() {
assocArr.init();
var key = 'test';
SpreadsheetApp.getUi().alert( assocArr.labels[key] );
Logger.log("onOpen: key: %s, value: %s",key, assocArr.labels[key]);
};
The logger message confirms that init() loads the data from the worksheet.
Now if I try to reference this assocArr object in onEdit() it returns undefined for all key values.
function onEdit(event) {
var key = 'test';
SpreadsheetApp.getUi().alert( assocArr.labels[key] );
Logger.log("onEdit: key: %s, value: %s",key, assocArr.labels[key]);
};
I infer that for security reasons, Google limited the simple-trigger onEdit() to not have global variable scope, same as they voided the utility of the event.user property.
Now instead if I simply put the key-value pair in the cache, it works! Here is the complete code that works using the Cache Service.
var cache = CacheService.getPrivateCache();
var assocArr = {
init: function () {
var sheet = SpreadsheetApp.getActiveSpreadsheet().getSheetByName('Account Labels');
var values = sheet.getDataRange().getValues();
for(var row in values) {
cache.put(values[row][0], values[row][1], 3600);
};
return(void(0));
},
};
function onOpen() {
assocArr.init();
var key = 'test';
SpreadsheetApp.getUi().alert( cache.get(key) );
Logger.log("onOpen: key: %s, value: %s",key, cache.get(key));
};
function onEdit(event) {
var key = 'test';
SpreadsheetApp.getUi().alert( cache.get(key) );
Logger.log("onEdit: key: %s, value: %s",key, cache.get(key));
};
Curiously, the onEdit() has the cache variable in its scope.
Here again is the shared Gsheet demonstrating this curious behavior.
I found this really quick way that is not listed
Create a json object (array style)
var myArray = {
1:{"id": "inprogress","title" : "in Progress"},
2:{"id": "notstarted","title" : "Not Started"},
3:{"id": "completed" ,"title" : "Completed"}
};
read the json
// get the lenght of the json object
var jsonSize = Object.keys(myArray).length;
// use this in a loop
for (var i = 1; i < Object.keys(jsonSize).length; i++) {
var title = myArray[i].title;
}
Works like a charm for me