So I have a controller like this
app.controller("ReservationCtrl", function($scope) {
$scope.rooms = [{id: 1, name: "Room 1"}, {id: 2, name: "Room 2", }];
$scope.reservation = {id: 1, time: "9AM", room: {id: 2, name: "Room 2"}};
});
A view that looks like this:
<select ng-model="reservation.room" ng-options="room as room.name for room in rooms"></select>
The problem is that the select box won't bind to the correct room unless I say
$scope.reservation.room = $scope.rooms[1];
This is rather inconvenient for development as the room is not the only field on the reservation model that needs to be bound to a select box. How can I apply the binding without doing this extra step?
Also, the binding breaks again if I do something like
$http.get("/reservation/2").success(function(data) { $scope.reservation = angular.copy(data); });
I think this is because,
in your ng-options if you select an option, the selected value is an object
EX: if you select first option then model value is an object which is the first element in the $scope.rooms ({id: 1, name: "Room 1"}).
objects are reference type data type. So what it does is if the objects create one time then all of its usage are pointing to that object. have a look at this article.
So your selected value is an object which is a reference type. In your case you have two independent objects for the $scope.reservation.room and the {id: 2, name: "Room 2"} which is in rooms array. note that they are in separated memory slots.
In your working case both of the $scope.reservation.room and the {id: 2, name: "Room 2"} which is in rooms array are pointing to same memory slot because you have equals the two as $scope.reservation.room = $scope.rooms[1]; This means $scope.reservation.room & $scope.rooms[1] both are pointing to the same object in the memory.
To work this out you can do something different than your working solution.
change the ng-repeat as following
...ng-options="room.id as room.name for room in rooms"...
and change the ng-model
....ng-model="reservation.id"....
this will select the id of the option as the selected value for EX if you select the first option then the model value will be 1 which is the id of the first option.
in this case selected model values are primitive(like 1,2,3..) type data then its not going to search for the objects in memory instead it will get the value of stack and check with the option values and select the correct one.
here is a DEMO this will select the second option initially.
------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY -------------------------------------------------
If the selected model value is an object then it will check the memory address of the selected object and the all objects of the $scope.rooms and check if there is a matching element and select the matching option if one is found. if no one found then nothing will select.
If the model values are primitive like 1,2,3.. it will search the value and check if there any matching option value if one is found it will select that option.
So it seems the key to this problem is the track by clause in the ng-options directive. See my updated fiddle
As you will see, the whole model is being updated and not just its ID. The documentation says that select as and track by were not meant to be used together, but the example they used to illustrate this is a bit different from mine.
Since I've received no feedback from the official Angular channels on this matter to date, I'm gonna mark this as solved and move on.
Thanks for the help everyone.
When the view is loaded, the select box has no selected value because the room object in $scope.reservation is not the same object as the one in $scope.rooms, event if it has the same values.
Thats why your example does not work (fiddle)
But this one works:
$scope.rooms = [{id: 1, name: "Room 1"}, {id: 2, name: "Room 2"}];
$scope.reservation = {
id: 1,
time: "9AM",
room: $scope.rooms[1] // <-- now the reservation room references a valid ng-repeated room
};
See updated fiddle
To avoid problems, I'll suggest you bind to the variable of your select box only the room id of the reservation. Because it is a primitive type, the comparison will be made by value, and that will solve also your second use case. Moreover, you better not duplicate data in the reservation object. See fiddle
If you need to display the name of the reserved (selected) room, you could easily write a getRoomById function that will look into the array of rooms.
Change the scope only when the value changes.
if($scope.reservation.room != $scope.rooms[1])
$scope.reservation.room = $scope.rooms[1];
Related
This issue original raise on github of alpaca framework, https://github.com/gitana/alpaca/issues/731
Just open one here for getting support from stackoverflow community.
A Combination of multi select and array cause a problem that the second and later select boxes inherit the selection status of their former siblings.
See my codepen: https://codepen.io/hadakadenkyu/full/pooKyzy
any help would be appreciated!!
Your issue was related to the object datasource that you've created.
Internally alpacajs transforms your datasource object to text and value, and it needs it to be only of type {key: value} so in your example you should do {"2001": 2002} for example.
Moreover, in your alpaca form data object you should use select option values not text like: year: ["2001", "2003"]
Update:
I rechecked the documentation and I saw:
Datasource for generating list of options. This can be a string or a function. If a string, it is considered S be a URI to a service that produces a object containing key/value pairs or an array of elements of structure {'text': '', 'value': ''}. This can also be a function that is called to produce the same list.
So to make your example works you should wrap your datasource object value into a function like:
dataSource: function(callback) {
callback([
{ "text": "2000", "value": 2000 }, ...
Here's the first example.
Here's the second example.
In Angular loops (ng-repeat, ng-options) you can use the following syntax:
item as item.label for item in items
Can someone please explain what each of the tokens in the expression is doing there and what it means? Can you point me to the documentation of this? I can't figure out what to search for (searching for 'as' or 'for' is useless). It is not mentioned in the documentation for ng-repeat or ng-options.
I know that somehow it lets you pick an object from a list of objects, but 'item' appears in the expression twice and it is not clear to me what the role of that token is in this expression.
Sorry if this is all documented some place which I can not find....
You have an array "items". And you are interating through it with
item in items
As the example you have copied incompletely from this page "https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/directive/ngOptions" would normally create a dropdown, there would be now the problem that the "item" object you currently have in your iteration has more fields than just a string to show as label for your dropdown entry. Here is the object again:
$scope.items = [{
id: 1,
label: 'aLabel',
subItem: { name: 'aSubItem' }
}, {
id: 2,
label: 'bLabel',
subItem: { name: 'bSubItem' }
}];
So what do you want to show then? Yeah, you want to show "item.label".
And thats what
item as item.label
does. It tells the loop to use the current "item.label" value as "item" for this specific loop.
I have looked what seems everywhere for this but maybe it is too obvious and no one mentions it but I am making a windows 8 app and I want the user to be able to edit the data.
Lets say im trying to make a To-Do list, I want the user to be able to add entries. For my current app with dummy static data I have these entries stored in an array in a javascript file. Should I just make the user be able to add/edit/remove entries in the array or is there a different method I should use?
If someone could link me some material to read or an example that shows what I am looking for it would be really helpful.
It really depends on the JavaScript framework you're using. Assuming that you're using Microsoft's own WinJS, what you're looking for is "data binding". This allows you to bind an object or an array to a "control" and have it be automatically updated. Then you just work with the array, adding, removing, sorting items. The data-bind automatically reflects those changes in the template.
Here is a quick example of data-binding from MSDNs own documentation:
<div id="listDiv"
data-win-control="WinJS.UI.ListView"
data-win-options="{ itemDataSource : dataList.dataSource }">
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var dataArray = [
{ name: "Marley", species: "dog" },
{ name: "Lola", species: "cat" },
{ name: "Leo", species: "dog" },
{ name: "Izzy", species: "cat" },
{ name: "Ziggy", species: "cat" },
{ name: "Ruby", species: "dog" }
];
var dataList = new WinJS.Binding.List(dataArray);
WinJS.UI.processAll();
</script>
You can see more here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh700774.aspx
Each JavaScript framework does this a little bit differently. For example, AngularJS would let you bind an array to a list like this:
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="item in list">{{item.name}}</li>
</ul>
Where 'list' is the name of an array of objects in your scope, item is a single object in the array, and item.name is a string with the name of a single object. The syntax is different, but once again, you would simply manipulate the array and it would be reflected in the resulting HTML.
My menu renders the "selected" array as options. Then when an item is selected it renders it's branches as the new options.
To keep track of traversal I create an array called select. So if someone picked the 3rd option then the 1st option then the 6th option, select = [3,1,6]
That's easy enough just pushing the index into the array, my question is how can I use this array to create a reference to the tree?
If select is [3,1,6] I want create a function that results in a reference to tree[3][1][6] also allowing me to traverse backwards by clipping off the last value of the array.
(in coffeescript)
tree:
name: 'name1'
branches:[
name: 'name2'
branches: [
name: 'name3'
branches: [
name: 'name4'
branches:[]
,
name: 'name5'
branches:[]
,
name: 'name6'
branches:[]
]
]
]
current = tree
#when clicked
$('.menu li').on 'click', ()->
select.push($(this).index())
for value in select
current = current+'['+value+']'
#this results in a string, not an actual reference to the tree.
If I understand correctly what you need, changing the last 2 lines with the following should do the trick:
current = tree
for value in select
current = current['branches'][value]
I'm using the JQuery Autocomplete plugin, with local data stored in a array:
data = [city1, city2, city3, city1]
Once the user selects the data element, for example city 1, I store it in user_input. I use the user input to read a hash that contains city, state zip, and name. The script displays each element of the hash on screen when the user hits enter. This also works great:
$(document).keypress(function(e) {
if(e.keyCode == 13) {
var user_input = $("input#example").val()
$.each(personinfo,function(key,value){
if(value['city']== user_input){
$('#city').empty().append(value['city']);
$('#state').empty().append(value['state']);
$('#zip').empty().append(value['zip']);
$('#name').empty().append(value['name']);
}
})
The problem arises when there are two identical keys. For instance, say a name "John Doe" and "Jane Doe", live in the same city: city1. Therefore city1 appears twice in the data array, as you see above.
data is defined in this method:
var data = new Array();
$(document).ready(function(){
$.each(personinfo,function(key,value){
myarray.push(value['city'])
});
});
How can I differentiate amongst city1 and city1 in the above array within the keypress function?
The personinfo map object:
{"address":"07288 Albertha Station","city":"Littelside","created_at":"2011-05-25T19:24:51Z","id":1,"name":"Jane Doe","state":"Missouri","updated_at":"2011-05-26T21:25:54Z","zip":"75475-9938"},{OBJECT 2}, {OBJECT 3}, ....
As some of the comments suggest, it's impossible to fix a problem with identical keys: the only way to fix it is to use non-identical keys :-)
I'd just combine city and state to make the key; seems like that should give you a unique keyset.
It's probably late now, but I just had to fix this problem in a similar plugin and the best way of doing it is to pass additional reference with the lookup data.
As in lookup = { data: ['name1', 'name2', 'name2', 'namex'], ref:[1,2,3,4] }
So that when user selects second 'name2' the plugin will return selected 'name2' and ref 3.
It depends on a plugin if it supports this functionality, but even if it doesn't you should be able to modify it slighlty.