We Keep Coding

Access a function from a Component in another Component in React

I am totally blank on how to use a function that is inside a component and needs to be used in another component.
Here is a simple program:
Test.js
export default function Test(){
const testFunc = () => {
console.log("it is working")
}
return(
<div>
Hi
</div>
)
}
Test2.js
export default function Test2(){
return(
<button onClick={}> // Here I want to use testFunc() from Test file
Click
</button>
)
}
Could someone please explain how can it be achieved to access the function in Test2 file.
Thanks in advance!!

You will want to pass the function as a prop to the child component. You can't or I should say shouldn't pass a prop to a parent, you can do this but is not a react way and never recommended. What you would do in this case is but the logic in the parent because both siblings are needing access to it.
const App = () => {
const clickHandler = () => {
alert("Click event")
}
return (
<div className="App">
<ChildOne clickHandler={clickHandler}/>
<ChildTwo clickHandler={clickHandler}/>
</div>
)
}
}

You can either pass it down from a parent component, shown below, or you can use a custom hook
Parent Component:
import Child from './Child.js'
export default function Parent() {
const functionToBePassed = () => { ... }
return (
<Child func={functionToBePassed}>
)
}
Or you can do it via a custom hook
Two files, first one is the hook
export default function useFunc() {
const functionToBeShared = () => {...}
return { functionToBeShared }
}
//this is any component that wants to use the hook
import useFunc from ./useFunc;
export default function ComponentThatUsesHook() {
const {functionToBeShared} = useFunc();
}

Welcome to the React community.
To use a function that is inside a component and needs to be used in another component.
You need a common parent, that handles the function.
Let's say you have the following structure.
export const ParentComponent = () => {
return <>
<Test1 />
<Test2 />
<>
}
If you want some function in Test1 to affect Test2, then you do what in react is called lifting state up https://reactjs.org/docs/lifting-state-up.html
ParentComponent
export const ParentComponent = () => {
const [value, setValue] = useState('')
return <>
<Test1 setValue={setValue} />
<Test2 value={value} />
<>
}
Test1
export const Test1 = (props) => {
return <>
<input onChange={(e) => props.setValue(e.target.vale} />
<>
}
Test2
export const Test2 = (props) => {
return <p>{props.value}</p>
}
When a component renders another component, it is called the parent of the rendered child. Imagine React as a tree data structure where the App.tsx/jsx will be the tree's root.
Inspecting the code above, we can see that we have a function held in the parent. This is the function you would probably consider putting in Test1. However, if you need to use it in another component, that is not a child of the current element. You will need to find the nearest common parent and pass the functionality down like in the example above.
I hope it makes sense. If not, I recommend glancing at the Main Concepts part of the official React documentation. https://reactjs.org/docs/getting-started.html

As Konrad said in the comments, this can't be possible since these 2 components lack no relationship (Neither Components are rendering or calling each other within)
Something you could do is Render the Test2.js component within Test.js and add a callback like so:
Test.js
import Test2 from '...';
export default function Test(){
const testFunc = () => {
console.log("it is working")
}
return(
<div>
Hi
<Test2 callbackProp={testFunc} />
</div>
)
}
Test2.js
export default function Test2({callbackProp}){
return(
<button onClick={() => {callbackProp();} }> // Here I want to use testFunc() from Test file
Click
</button>
)
}
Now whenever Test.js is rendered, it will also render Test2 (Since Test is rendering a Test2 Component) but whenever you click the button within Test2, it will execute the callback which is a function passed from Test
Nonetheless though, it's impossible to call any functions from another Component without passing down a prop like this (for future reference)

Solution
Usually, context is used to share the same state between many components that aren't in parent-children relations.
codesandbox
Creating context
First, create a context:
const MyContext = createContext();
And context provider:
const MyContextProvider = ({ children }) => {
const [myState, setMyState] = useState(0);
return (
<MyContext.Provider value={{ myState, setMyState }}>
{children}
</MyContext.Provider>
);
};
And context hook (for convenience):
const useMyContext = () => useContext(MyContext);
Using context
Remember to use the provider in the common ancestor of the components:
function App() {
return (
<MyContextProvider>
<Component1 />
<Component2 />
</MyContextProvider>
);
}
Create your components:
function Component1() {
// as you can see, you can access the function here
const { setMyState } = useMyContext();
return (
<button onClick={() => setMyState((state) => state + 1)}>click me</button>
);
}
function Component2() {
// and the value here
const { myState } = useMyContext();
return myState;
}

In React is passing a component directly to another component allowed?

I am new to react and was wondering if you are allowed to directly pass one or more components to another instead of passing it as a prop or child.
Consider the following:
const ChildComponent = () => {
return (
<h1> I am a child </h1>
);
}
const ChildComponent2 = () => {
return (
<h1> I am also a child </h1>
);
}
//Passing directly to Parent
const ParentComponent = () => {
return (
<div>
<ChildComponent/>
<ChildComponent2/>
</div>
);
}
//Passing as children
const ParentComponent2 = ({ChildComponent, ChildComponent2}) => {
return (
<div>
{ChildComponent}
{ChildComponent2}
</div>
);
}
<ParentComponent>
<ChildComponent/>
<ChildComponent2/>
</ParentComponent>
I have read about passing components as children vs props. I have also seen that it is an antipattern to create functional components inside of functional components. I can't seem to find anything about directly passing one or more components inside of another without using props or children. When testing it out, the component rendered properly, but I am not sure if it's a valid way of passing components to a parent component.

With React's composition model, you can take advantage of the special children prop to pass children elements directly.
// With props object destructuring
const ParentComponent = ({children}) => {
return (
<div>
{children}
</div>
);
}
// Without props object destructuring
const ParentComponent = (props) => {
return (
<div>
{props.children}
</div>
);
}
This lets you pass other components as children to the parent component by nesting the JSX:
// A pair of children components
const ChildComponent1 = () => {
return <div>I am child 1</div>;
};
const ChildComponent2 = () => {
return <div>I am child 2</div>;
};
// Compose your parent component with its children
const App = (props) => {
return (
<ParentComponent>
<ChildComponent1 />
<ChildComponent2 />
</ParentComponent>
);
}
As per the React docs, this is the recommended way of composing your components.
As a final thought, sometimes you might need specialized components or partials and perhaps not make use of children but always render a specific component.

How to render children in react component without passing it?

I have component:
const PapeConainer = ({children}) => {
return (
<div //some classes and other stuff>
{children}
</div>
);
}
But on merge request got a comment that i don't need to pass children, because function already has it. So, my questing is it possible to render children without passing it. I`m not found any information on this.
like:
const PapeConainer = () => {
return (
<div //some classes and other stuff>
{magic.children}
</div>
);
}

Actually you can't do that, you have to get the children object from props, just as you said:
const PapeContainer = ({children}) => {
return (
<div //some classes and other stuff>
{children}
</div>
);
}
I think that what that comment wanted to say is that you don't have to pass children as a specific prop named "children" in your parent component, like this:
<PapeContainer //some classes and other stuff
children={someChildren}
/>
That would not make sense because "children" is a special property of React which contains any child elements defined within the component. So instead of passing the prop explicitly you put the children content inside the parent tag, like this:
<PapeContainer //some classes and other stuff>
{someChildren}
/>

Actually you can not do that. What you are able to do is to pass the children as a component prop or as an hierarchy children, like this (which is the same component prop, but with another code implementation):
// The children container component
function ReceiveChild({children}) {
return (
{children}
);
}
// DOM Element hierarchy method component
function PassChild() {
return (
<ReceiveChild>
<p className="the-child-div">Children</p>
</ReceiveChild>
);
}
// Component prop method component
function PassChild2() {
return (
<ReceiveChild children={
<p className="the-child-div">
Children
</p>}
/>
);
}

ReactJS - How to expose your Component to external events? [duplicate]

I have two components:
Parent component
Child component
I was trying to call Child's method from Parent, I tried this way but couldn't get a result:
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
return (
<Child>
<button onClick={Child.getAlert()}>Click</button>
</Child>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
getAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
);
}
}
Is there a way to call Child's method from Parent?
Note: Child and Parent components are in two different files.

First off, let me express that this is generally not the way to go about things in React land. Usually what you want to do is pass down functionality to children in props, and pass up notifications from children in events (or better yet: dispatch).
But if you must expose an imperative method on a child component, you can use refs. Remember this is an escape hatch and usually indicates a better design is available.
Previously, refs were only supported for Class-based components.
With the advent of React Hooks, that's no longer the case
Modern React with Hooks (v16.8+)
const { forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle } = React;
// We need to wrap component in `forwardRef` in order to gain
// access to the ref object that is assigned using the `ref` prop.
// This ref is passed as the second parameter to the function component.
const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
// The component instance will be extended
// with whatever you return from the callback passed
// as the second argument
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
getAlert() {
alert("getAlert from Child");
}
}));
return <h1>Hi</h1>;
});
const Parent = () => {
// In order to gain access to the child component instance,
// you need to assign it to a `ref`, so we call `useRef()` to get one
const childRef = useRef();
return (
<div>
<Child ref={childRef} />
<button onClick={() => childRef.current.getAlert()}>Click</button>
</div>
);
};
ReactDOM.render(
<Parent />,
document.getElementById('root')
);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16/umd/react.development.js" crossorigin></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16/umd/react-dom.development.js" crossorigin></script>
<div id="root"></div>
Documentation for useImperativeHandle() is here:
useImperativeHandle customizes the instance value that is exposed to parent components when using ref.
Legacy API using Class Components (>= react#16.4)
const { Component } = React;
class Parent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.child = React.createRef();
}
onClick = () => {
this.child.current.getAlert();
};
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child ref={this.child} />
<button onClick={this.onClick}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
getAlert() {
alert('getAlert from Child');
}
render() {
return <h1>Hello</h1>;
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, document.getElementById('root'));
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16/umd/react.development.js" crossorigin></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16/umd/react-dom.development.js" crossorigin></script>
<div id="root"></div>
Callback Ref API
Callback-style refs are another approach to achieving this, although not quite as common in modern React:
const { Component } = React;
const { render } = ReactDOM;
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child ref={instance => { this.child = instance; }} />
<button onClick={() => { this.child.getAlert(); }}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
getAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1>Hello</h1>
);
}
}
render(
<Parent />,
document.getElementById('app')
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>

You can use another pattern here:
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child setClick={click => this.clickChild = click}/>
<button onClick={() => this.clickChild()}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.getAlert = this.getAlert.bind(this);
}
componentDidMount() {
this.props.setClick(this.getAlert);
}
getAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
);
}
}
What it does is to set the parent's clickChild method when child is mounted. In this way when you click the button in parent it will call clickChild which calls child's getAlert.
This also works if your child is wrapped with connect() so you don't need the getWrappedInstance() hack.
Note you can't use onClick={this.clickChild} in parent because when parent is rendered child is not mounted so this.clickChild is not assigned yet. Using onClick={() => this.clickChild()} is fine because when you click the button this.clickChild should already be assigned.

Alternative method with useEffect:
Parent:
const [refresh, doRefresh] = useState(0);
<Button onClick={() => doRefresh(prev => prev + 1)} />
<Children refresh={refresh} />
Children:
useEffect(() => {
performRefresh(); //children function of interest
}, [props.refresh]);

Here I will give you the four possible combinations that can happen:
Class Parent | Hook Child
Hook Parent | Class Child
Hook Parent | Hook Child
Class Parent | Class Child
1. Class Parent | Hook Child
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.myRef = React.createRef()
}
render() {
return (<View>
<Child ref={this.myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => this.myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
}
const Child = React.forwardRef((props, ref) => {
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
childMethod() {
childMethod()
}
}))
function childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
})
2. Hook Parent | Class Child
function Parent(props) {
const myRef = useRef()
return (<View>
<Child ref={myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
class Child extends React.Component {
childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
render() {
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
}
}
3. Hook Parent | Hook Child
function Parent(props) {
const myRef = useRef()
return (<View>
<Child ref={myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
const Child = React.forwardRef((props, ref) => {
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
childMethod() {
childMethod()
}
}))
function childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
})
4. Class Parent | Class Child
class Parent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.myRef = React.createRef()
}
render() {
return (<View>
<Child ref={this.myRef}/>
<Button title={'call me'}
onPress={() => this.myRef.current.childMethod()}/>
</View>)
}
}
class Child extends React.Component {
childMethod() {
console.log('call me')
}
render() {
return (<View><Text> I am a child</Text></View>)
}
}

https://facebook.github.io/react/tips/expose-component-functions.html
for more answers ref here Call methods on React children components
By looking into the refs of the "reason" component, you're breaking encapsulation and making it impossible to refactor that component without carefully examining all the places it's used. Because of this, we strongly recommend treating refs as private to a component, much like state.
In general, data should be passed down the tree via props. There are a few exceptions to this (such as calling .focus() or triggering a one-time animation that doesn't really "change" the state) but any time you're exposing a method called "set", props are usually a better choice. Try to make it so that the inner input component worries about its size and appearance so that none of its ancestors do.

I wasn't satisfied with any of the solutions presented here. There is actually a very simple solution that can be done using pure Javascript without relying upon some React functionality other than the basic props object - and it gives you the benefit of communicating in either direction (parent -> child, child -> parent). You need to pass an object from the parent component to the child component. This object is what I refer to as a "bi-directional reference" or biRef for short. Basically, the object contains a reference to methods in the parent that the parent wants to expose. And the child component attaches methods to the object that the parent can call. Something like this:
// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {
function someParentFunction() {
// The child component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the function inside the child component.
biRef.someChildFunction();
}
// Add all the functions here that the child can call.
var biRef = {
someParentFunction: someParentFunction
}
return <div>
<MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {
function someChildFunction() {
// The parent component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the parent function.
props.biRef.someParentFunction();
}
// Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
// to be able to call.
props.biRef.someChildFunction = someChildFunction;
return <div>
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
The other advantage to this solution is that you can add a lot more functions in the parent and child while passing them from the parent to the child using only a single property.
An improvement over the code above is to not add the parent and child functions directly to the biRef object but rather to sub members. Parent functions should be added to a member called "parent" while the child functions should be added to a member called "child".
// Parent component.
function MyParentComponent(props) {
function someParentFunction() {
// The child component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the function inside the child component.
biRef.child.someChildFunction();
}
// Add all the functions here that the child can call.
var biRef = {
parent: {
someParentFunction: someParentFunction
}
}
return <div>
<MyChildComponent biRef={biRef} />
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
// Child component
function MyChildComponent(props) {
function someChildFunction() {
// The parent component can call this function.
}
function onButtonClick() {
// Call the parent function.
props.biRef.parent.someParentFunction();
}
// Add all the child functions to props.biRef that you want the parent
// to be able to call.
props.biRef {
child: {
someChildFunction: someChildFunction
}
}
return <div>
<Button onClick={onButtonClick} />
</div>;
}
By placing parent and child functions into separate members of the biRef object, you 'll have a clean separation between the two and easily see which ones belong to parent or child. It also helps to prevent a child component from accidentally overwriting a parent function if the same function appears in both.
One last thing is that if you note, the parent component creates the biRef object with var whereas the child component accesses it through the props object. It might be tempting to not define the biRef object in the parent and access it from its parent through its own props parameter (which might be the case in a hierarchy of UI elements). This is risky because the child may think a function it is calling on the parent belongs to the parent when it might actually belong to a grandparent. There's nothing wrong with this as long as you are aware of it. Unless you have a reason for supporting some hierarchy beyond a parent/child relationship, it's best to create the biRef in your parent component.

I hope I'm not repeating anything from above but what about passing a callback prop that sets the function in the parent? This works and is pretty easy. (Added code is between the ////'s)
class Parent extends Component {
/////
getAlert = () => {} // initial value for getAlert
setGetAlertMethod = (newMethod) => {
this.getAlert = newMethod;
}
/////
render() {
return (
<Child setGetAlertMethod={this.setGetAlertMethod}>
<button onClick={this.getAlert}>Click</button>
</Child>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
/////
componentDidMount() {
this.props.setGetAlertMethod(this.getAlert);
}
/////
getAlert() => {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1 ref="hello">Hello</h1>
);
}
}

you can use ref to call the function of the child component from the parent
Functional Component Solution
in functional component, you have to use useImperativeHandle for getting ref into a child like below
import React, { forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle } from 'react';
export default function ParentFunction() {
const childRef = useRef();
return (
<div className="container">
<div>
Parent Component
</div>
<button
onClick={() => { childRef.current.showAlert() }}
>
Call Function
</button>
<Child ref={childRef}/>
</div>
)
}
const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
useImperativeHandle(
ref,
() => ({
showAlert() {
alert("Child Function Called")
}
}),
)
return (
<div>Child Component</div>
)
})
Class Component Solution
Child.js
import s from './Child.css';
class Child extends Component {
getAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return (
<h1>Hello</h1>
);
}
}
export default Child;
Parent.js
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
onClick() {
this.refs.child.getAlert();
}
return (
<div>
<Child ref="child" />
<button onClick={this.onClick}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}

I'm using useEffect hook to overcome the headache of doing all this so now I pass a variable down to child like this:
import { useEffect, useState } from "react";
export const ParentComponent = () => {
const [trigger, setTrigger] = useState(false);
return (
<div onClick={() => { setTrigger(trigger => !trigger); }}>
<ChildComponent trigger={trigger}></ChildComponent>
</div>
);
};
export const ChildComponent = (props) => {
const triggerInvokedFromParent = () => {
console.log('TriggerInvokedFromParent');
};
useEffect(() => {
triggerInvokedFromParent();
}, [props.trigger]);
return <span>ChildComponent</span>;
};

We can use refs in another way as-
We are going to create a Parent element, it will render a <Child/> component. As you can see, the component that will be rendered, you need to add the ref attribute and provide a name for it.
Then, the triggerChildAlert function, located in the parent class will access the refs property of the this context (when the triggerChildAlert function is triggered will access the child reference and it will has all the functions of the child element).
class Parent extends React.Component {
triggerChildAlert(){
this.refs.child.callChildMethod();
// to get child parent returned value-
// this.value = this.refs.child.callChildMethod();
// alert('Returned value- '+this.value);
}
render() {
return (
<div>
{/* Note that you need to give a value to the ref parameter, in this case child*/}
<Child ref="child" />
<button onClick={this.triggerChildAlert}>Click</button>
</div>
);
}
}
Now, the child component, as theoretically designed previously, will look like:
class Child extends React.Component {
callChildMethod() {
alert('Hello World');
// to return some value
// return this.state.someValue;
}
render() {
return (
<h1>Hello</h1>
);
}
}
Here is the source code-
Hope will help you !

If you are doing this simply because you want the Child to provide a re-usable trait to its parents, then you might consider doing that using render-props instead.
That technique actually turns the structure upside down. The Child now wraps the parent, so I have renamed it to AlertTrait below. I kept the name Parent for continuity, although it is not really a parent now.
// Use it like this:
<AlertTrait renderComponent={Parent}/>
class AlertTrait extends Component {
// You will need to bind this function, if it uses 'this'
doAlert() {
alert('clicked');
}
render() {
return this.props.renderComponent({ doAlert: this.doAlert });
}
}
class Parent extends Component {
render() {
return (
<button onClick={this.props.doAlert}>Click</button>
);
}
}
In this case, the AlertTrait provides one or more traits which it passes down as props to whatever component it was given in its renderComponent prop.
The Parent receives doAlert as a prop, and can call it when needed.
(For clarity, I called the prop renderComponent in the above example. But in the React docs linked above, they just call it render.)
The Trait component can render stuff surrounding the Parent, in its render function, but it does not render anything inside the parent. Actually it could render things inside the Parent, if it passed another prop (e.g. renderChild) to the parent, which the parent could then use during its render method.
This is somewhat different from what the OP asked for, but some people might end up here (like we did) because they wanted to create a reusable trait, and thought that a child component was a good way to do that.

For functional components easiest way is
Parent Component
parent.tsx
import React, { useEffect, useState, useRef } from "react";
import child from "../../child"
const parent: React.FunctionComponent = () => {
const childRef: any = useRef();
}
const onDropDownChange: any = (event): void => {
const target = event.target;
childRef.current.onFilterChange(target.value);
};
return <child ref={childRef} />
export default parent;
Child Component
child.tsx
import React, { useState, useEffect, forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle, } from "react";
const Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
useImperativeHandle(ref, () => ({
onFilterChange(id) {
console.log("Value from parent", id)
},
}));
})
Child.displayName = "Child";
export default Child;

The logic is simple.
Create a function in parent using child or use ref.
I prefer the creating function in parent using child. There are multiple ways to do it.
When using functional components
In Parent
function Parent(){
const [functionToCall, createFunctionToCall] = useState(()=>()=>{})
return (
<Child createFunctionToCall={createFunctionToCall} />
)
}
In Child
function Child({createFunctionToCall}){
useEffect(()=>{
function theFunctionToCall(){
// do something like setting something
// don't forget to set dependancies properly.
}
createFunctionToCall(()=>theFunctionToCall)
},[createFunctionToCall])
}

This pattern is similar to #brickingup answer. But in this version you can set as many child actions you want.
import { useEffect } from "react";
export const Parent = () => {
const childEvents = { click: () => {} };
return (
<div onClick={() => childEvents.click()}>
<Child events={childEvents}></Child>
</div>
);
};
export const Child = (props) => {
const click = () => {
alert("click from child");
};
useEffect(() => {
if (props.events) {
props.events.click = click;
}
}, []);
return <span>Child Component</span>;
};

We're happy with a custom hook we call useCounterKey. It just sets up a counterKey, or a key that counts up from zero. The function it returns resets the key (i.e. increment). (I believe this is the most idiomatic way in React to reset a component - just bump the key.)
However this hook also works in any situation where you want to send a one-time message to the client to do something. E.g. we use it to focus a control in the child on a certain parent event - it just autofocuses anytime the key is updated. (If more props are needed they could be set prior to resetting the key so they're available when the event happens.)
This method has a bit of a learning curve b/c it's not as straightforward as a typical event handler, but it seems the most idiomatic way to handle this in React that we've found (since keys already function this way). Def open to feedback on this method but it is working well!
// Main helper hook:
export function useCounterKey() {
const [key, setKey] = useState(0);
return [key, () => setKey(prev => prev + 1)] as const;
}
Sample usages:
// Sample 1 - normal React, just reset a control by changing Key on demand
function Sample1() {
const [inputLineCounterKey, resetInputLine] = useCounterKey();
return <>
<InputLine key={inputLineCounterKey} />
<button onClick={() => resetInputLine()} />
<>;
}
// Second sample - anytime the counterKey is incremented, child calls focus() on the input
function Sample2() {
const [amountFocusCounterKey, focusAmountInput] = useCounterKey();
// ... call focusAmountInput in some hook or event handler as needed
return <WorkoutAmountInput focusCounterKey={amountFocusCounterKey} />
}
function WorkoutAmountInput(props) {
useEffect(() => {
if (counterKey > 0) {
// Don't focus initially
focusAmount();
}
}, [counterKey]);
// ...
}
(Credit to Kent Dodds for the counterKey concept.)

Parent component
import Child from './Child'
export default function Parent(props) {
const [childRefreshFunction, setChildRefreshFunction] = useState(null);
return (
<div>
<button type="button" onClick={() => {
childRefreshFunction();
}}>Refresh child</button>
<Child setRefreshFunction={(f) => {
setChildRefreshFunction(f);
}} />
</div>
)
}
Child component
export default function Child(props) {
useEffect(() => {
props.setRefreshFunction(() => refreshMe);
}, []);
function refreshMe() {
fetch('http://example.com/data.json')....
};
return (
<div>
child
</div>
)
}

You can achieve this easily in this way
Steps-
Create a boolean variable in the state in the parent class. Update this when you want to call a function.
Create a prop variable and assign the boolean variable.
From the child component access that variable using props and execute the method you want by having an if condition.
class Child extends Component {
Method=()=>{
--Your method body--
}
render() {
return (
//check whether the variable has been updated or not
if(this.props.updateMethod){
this.Method();
}
)
}
}
class Parent extends Component {
constructor(){
this.state={
callMethod:false
}
}
render() {
return (
//update state according to your requirement
this.setState({
callMethod:true
}}
<Child updateMethod={this.state.callMethod}></Child>
);
}
}

Another way of triggering a child function from parent is to make use of the componentDidUpdate function in child Component. I pass a prop triggerChildFunc from Parent to Child, which initially is null. The value changes to a function when the button is clicked and Child notice that change in componentDidUpdate and calls its own internal function.
Since prop triggerChildFunc changes to a function, we also get a callback to the Parent. If Parent don't need to know when the function is called the value triggerChildFunc could for example change from null to true instead.
const { Component } = React;
const { render } = ReactDOM;
class Parent extends Component {
state = {
triggerFunc: null
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<Child triggerChildFunc={this.state.triggerFunc} />
<button onClick={() => {
this.setState({ triggerFunc: () => alert('Callback in parent')})
}}>Click
</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class Child extends Component {
componentDidUpdate(prevProps) {
if (this.props.triggerChildFunc !== prevProps.triggerChildFunc) {
this.onParentTrigger();
}
}
onParentTrigger() {
alert('parent triggered me');
// Let's call the passed variable from parent if it's a function
if (this.props.triggerChildFunc && {}.toString.call(this.props.triggerChildFunc) === '[object Function]') {
this.props.triggerChildFunc();
}
}
render() {
return (
<h1>Hello</h1>
);
}
}
render(
<Parent />,
document.getElementById('app')
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id='app'></div>
CodePen: https://codepen.io/calsal/pen/NWPxbJv?editors=1010

Here my demo: https://stackblitz.com/edit/react-dgz1ee?file=styles.css
I am using useEffect to call the children component's methods. I have tried with Proxy and Setter_Getter but sor far useEffect seems to be the more convenient way to call a child method from parent. To use Proxy and Setter_Getter it seems there is some subtlety to overcome first, because the element firstly rendered is an objectLike's element through the ref.current return => <div/>'s specificity.
Concerning useEffect, you can also leverage on this approach to set the parent's state depending on what you want to do with the children.
In the demo's link I have provided, you will find my full ReactJS' code with my draftwork inside's so you can appreciate the workflow of my solution.
Here I am providing you my ReactJS' snippet with the relevant code only. :
import React, {
Component,
createRef,
forwardRef,
useState,
useEffect
} from "react";
{...}
// Child component
// I am defining here a forwardRef's element to get the Child's methods from the parent
// through the ref's element.
let Child = forwardRef((props, ref) => {
// I am fetching the parent's method here
// that allows me to connect the parent and the child's components
let { validateChildren } = props;
// I am initializing the state of the children
// good if we can even leverage on the functional children's state
let initialState = {
one: "hello world",
two: () => {
console.log("I am accessing child method from parent :].");
return "child method achieve";
}
};
// useState initialization
const [componentState, setComponentState] = useState(initialState);
// useEffect will allow me to communicate with the parent
// through a lifecycle data flow
useEffect(() => {
ref.current = { componentState };
validateChildren(ref.current.componentState.two);
});
{...}
});
{...}
// Parent component
class App extends Component {
// initialize the ref inside the constructor element
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.childRef = createRef();
}
// I am implementing a parent's method
// in child useEffect's method
validateChildren = childrenMethod => {
// access children method from parent
childrenMethod();
// or signaling children is ready
console.log("children active");
};
{...}
render(){
return (
{
// I am referencing the children
// also I am implementing the parent logic connector's function
// in the child, here => this.validateChildren's function
}
<Child ref={this.childRef} validateChildren={this.validateChildren} />
</div>
)
}

You can apply that logic very easily using your child component as a react custom hook.
How to implement it?
Your child returns a function.
Your child returns a JSON: {function, HTML, or other values} as the example.
In the example doesn't make sense to apply this logic but it is easy to see:
const {useState} = React;
//Parent
const Parent = () => {
//custome hook
const child = useChild();
return (
<div>
{child.display}
<button onClick={child.alert}>
Parent call child
</button>
{child.btn}
</div>
);
};
//Child
const useChild = () => {
const [clickCount, setClick] = React.useState(0);
{/* child button*/}
const btn = (
<button
onClick={() => {
setClick(clickCount + 1);
}}
>
Click me
</button>
);
return {
btn: btn,
//function called from parent
alert: () => {
alert("You clicked " + clickCount + " times");
},
display: <h1>{clickCount}</h1>
};
};
const rootElement = document.getElementById("root");
ReactDOM.render(<Parent />, rootElement);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.8.4/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.8.4/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="root"></div>

I tried using createRef or useRef. Somehow they all return null.
Secondly, this answer proposes to pass a prop that sets a function that seems the most reasonable to me. But if your child component is used in multiple places, you should add that extra prop to other places. Also if you want to call a method in the grandchild, this method might be too verbose or mouthful.
So I made my own function store in a very primitive way.
Below is functionStore.js file
const fns = {};
export function setFn(componentName, fnName, fn) {
if (fns[componentName]) {
fns[componentName][fnName] = fn;
} else {
fns[componentName] = { fnName: fn };
}
}
export function callFn(componentName, fnName) {
fns[componentName][fnName]();
}
I just set the functions that need to be called from any component.
import { setFn } from "./functionStore";
export class AComponent extends React.Component {
componentDidMount() {
setFn("AComponent", "aFunc", this.aFunc);
}
aFunc = () => { console.log("aFunc is called!"); };
}
Then I just call it from some other component
import { callFn } from "./functionStore";
export class BComponent extends React.Component {
// just call the function
bFunc = () => {
callFn("AComponent", "aFunc");
};
}
One disadvantage is the function to be called should be parameterless. But this might be fixed somehow as well. Currently, I don't need to pass parameters.

I think that the most basic way to call methods is by setting a request on the child component. Then as soon as the child handles the request, it calls a callback method to reset the request.
The reset mechanism is necessary to be able to send the same request multiple times after each other.
In parent component
In the render method of the parent:
const { request } = this.state;
return (<Child request={request} onRequestHandled={()->resetRequest()}/>);
The parent needs 2 methods, to communicate with its child in 2 directions.
sendRequest() {
const request = { param: "value" };
this.setState({ request });
}
resetRequest() {
const request = null;
this.setState({ request });
}
In child component
The child updates its internal state, copying the request from the props.
constructor(props) {
super(props);
const { request } = props;
this.state = { request };
}
static getDerivedStateFromProps(props, state) {
const { request } = props;
if (request !== state.request ) return { request };
return null;
}
Then finally it handles the request, and sends the reset to the parent:
componentDidMount() {
const { request } = this.state;
// todo handle request.
const { onRequestHandled } = this.props;
if (onRequestHandled != null) onRequestHandled();
}

Here's a bug? to look out for:
I concur with rossipedia's solution using forwardRef, useRef, useImperativeHandle
There's some misinformation online that says refs can only be created from React Class components, but you can indeed use Function Components if you use the aforementioned hooks above. A note, the hooks only worked for me after I changed the file to not use withRouter() when exporting the component. I.e. a change from
export default withRouter(TableConfig);
to instead be
export default TableConfig;
In hindsight the withRouter() is not needed for such a component anyway, but usually it doesn't hurt anything having it in. My use case is that I created a component to create a Table to handle the viewing and editing of config values, and I wanted to be able to tell this Child component to reset it's state values whenever the Parent form's Reset button was hit. UseRef() wouldn't properly get the ref or ref.current (kept on getting null) until I removed withRouter() from the file containing my child component TableConfig

How to handle inputs added by button in React [duplicate]

We should avoid method binding inside render because during re-rendering it will create the new methods instead of using the old one, that will affect the performance.
So for the scenarios like this:
<input onChange = { this._handleChange.bind(this) } ...../>
We can bind _handleChange method either in constructor:
this._handleChange = this._handleChange.bind(this);
Or we can use property initializer syntax:
_handleChange = () => {....}
Now lets consider the case where we want to pass some extra parameter, lets say in a simple todo app, onclick of item i need to delete the item from array, for that i need to pass either the item index or the todo name in each onClick method:
todos.map(el => <div key={el} onClick={this._deleteTodo.bind(this, el)}> {el} </div>)
For now just assume that todo names are unique.
As per DOC:
The problem with this syntax is that a different callback is created
each time the component renders.
Question:
How to avoid this way of binding inside render method or what are the alternatives of this?
Kindly provide any reference or example, thanks.

First: A simple solution will be to create a component for the content inside a map function and pass the values as props and when you call the function from the child component you can pass the value to the function passed down as props.
Parent
deleteTodo = (val) => {
console.log(val)
}
todos.map(el =>
<MyComponent val={el} onClick={this.deleteTodo}/>
)
MyComponent
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
deleteTodo = () => {
this.props.onClick(this.props.val);
}
render() {
return <div onClick={this.deleteTodo}> {this.props.val} </div>
}
}
Sample snippet
class Parent extends React.Component {
_deleteTodo = (val) => {
console.log(val)
}
render() {
var todos = ['a', 'b', 'c'];
return (
<div>{todos.map(el =>
<MyComponent key={el} val={el} onClick={this._deleteTodo}/>
)}</div>
)
}
}
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
_deleteTodo = () => {
console.log('here'); this.props.onClick(this.props.val);
}
render() {
return <div onClick={this._deleteTodo}> {this.props.val} </div>
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Parent/>, document.getElementById('app'));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/15.1.0/react-dom.min.js"></script>
<div id="app"></div>
EDIT:
Second: The other approach to it would be to use memoize and return a function
constructor() {
super();
this._deleteTodoListener = _.memoize(
this._deleteTodo, (element) => {
return element.hashCode();
}
)
}
_deleteTodo = (element) => {
//delete handling here
}
and using it like
todos.map(el => <div key={el} onClick={this._deleteTodoListener(el)}> {el} </div>)
P.S. However this is not a best solution and will still result in
multiple functions being created but is still an improvement over the
initial case.
Third: However a more appropriate solution to this will be to add an attribute to the topmost div and get the value from event like
_deleteTodo = (e) => {
console.log(e.currentTarget.getAttribute('data-value'));
}
todos.map(el => <div key={el} data-value={el} onClick={this._deleteTodo}> {el} </div>)
However, in this case the attributes are converted to string using toString method and hence and object will be converted to [Object Object] and and array like ["1" , "2", "3"] as "1, 2, 3"

How to avoid this way of binding inside render method or what are the
alternatives of this?
If you care about re-rendering then shouldComponentUpdate and PureComponent are your friends and they will help you optimize rendering.
You have to extract "Child" component from the "Parent" and pass always the same props and implement shouldComponentUpdate or use PureComponent. What we want is a case when we remove a child, other children shouldn't be re-rendered.
Example
import React, { Component, PureComponent } from 'react';
import { render } from 'react-dom';
class Product extends PureComponent {
render() {
const { id, name, onDelete } = this.props;
console.log(`<Product id=${id} /> render()`);
return (
<li>
{id} - {name}
<button onClick={() => onDelete(id)}>Delete</button>
</li>
);
}
}
class App extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
products: [
{ id: 1, name: 'Foo' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Bar' },
],
};
this.handleDelete = this.handleDelete.bind(this);
}
handleDelete(productId) {
this.setState(prevState => ({
products: prevState.products.filter(product => product.id !== productId),
}));
}
render() {
console.log(`<App /> render()`);
return (
<div>
<h1>Products</h1>
<ul>
{
this.state.products.map(product => (
<Product
key={product.id}
onDelete={this.handleDelete}
{...product}
/>
))
}
</ul>
</div>
);
}
}
render(<App />, document.getElementById('root'));
Demo: https://codesandbox.io/s/99nZGlyZ
Expected behaviour
<App /> render()
<Product id=1... render()
<Product id=2... render()
When we remove <Product id=2 ... only <App /> is re-rendered.
render()
To see those messages in demo, open the dev tools console.
The same technique is used and described in article: React is Slow, React is Fast: Optimizing React Apps in Practice by François Zaninotto.

Documentation encourages to use data-attributes and access them from within evt.target.dataset:
_deleteTodo = (evt) => {
const elementToDelete = evt.target.dataset.el;
this.setState(prevState => ({
todos: prevState.todos.filter(el => el !== elementToDelete)
}))
}
// and from render:
todos.map(
el => <div key={el} data-el={el} onClick={this._deleteTodo}> {el} </div>
)
Also note that this makes sense only when you have performance issues:
Is it OK to use arrow functions in render methods?
Generally speaking, yes, it is OK, and it is often the easiest way to
pass parameters to callback functions.
If you do have performance issues, by all means, optimize!

This answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/45053753/2808062 is definitely exhaustive, but I'd say fighting excessive re-renders instead of just re-creating the tiny callback would bring you more performance improvements. That's normally achieved by implementing a proper shouldComponentUpdate in the child component.
Even if the props are exactly the same, the following code will still re-render children unless they prevent it in their own shouldComponentUpdate (they might inherit it from PureComponent):
handleChildClick = itemId => {}
render() {
return this.props.array.map(itemData => <Child onClick={this.handleChildClick} data={itemData})
}
Proof: https://jsfiddle.net/69z2wepo/92281/.
So, in order to avoid re-renders, the child component has to implement shouldComponentUpdate anyway. Now, the only reasonable implementation is completely ignoring onClick regardless of whether it has changed:
shouldComponentUpdate(nextProps) {
return this.props.array !== nextProps.array;
}