We Keep Coding

Javascript method to be able see if a value changes without re rendering the page

I am trying to be able to read a value that is boolean to see if a user did a specific action or not and I am using the ReactJS functional component style. I am trying to read the runValue in my code to see if the run() method changed the value and I want to be able to read this value without recalling the function.
I want to be able to put in my useEffect method this line of code;
Run.RunFunction().run((index) => {
if (index) {
\\\ do stuff here if index is true
} else {
///if index is false
}
}
my code
const Run = {
RunFunction: () => {
let runValue = false;
return {
run() {
runValue = true
},
listener: function(val) {},
checkStatus: function(listen) {
this.listener = listen
}
}
},
}
Run.RunFunction().checkStatus((index) => {
if (index) {
console.log('running')
} else {
console.log('not running')
}
});
I am having trouble having this code to work and I want to be able to see the value of the runValue initially and if it changes.
Thank you

How do I use axios response in different components without using export?

As the tittle says, I would like to be able to use the same axios response for differents components.
I have some restrictions like, I'm onlyl able to use react by adding scripts tags to my html so things like exports or jsx are impossible for me.
This is my react code:
class User extends React.Component {
state = {
user: {}
}
componentWillMount() {
console.log(localStorage.getItem("user"))
axios.get('http://localhost:8080/dashboard?user=' + localStorage.getItem("user"))
.then(res => {
const userResponse = res.data
setTimeout(() =>
this.setState({user: userResponse.user}), 1000);
})
}
render () {
const {user} = this.state
if (user.fullName === undefined)
return React.createElement("div", null, 'loading..');
return React.createElement("span", {className: "mr-2 d-none d-lg-inline text-gray-600 small" }, user.fullName);
}
}
ReactDOM.render( React.createElement(User, {}, null), document.getElementById('userDropdown') );
class Roles extends React.Component{
state = {
user: {}
}
componentWillMount() {
console.log(localStorage.getItem("user"))
axios.get('http://localhost:8080/dashboard?user=' + localStorage.getItem("user"))
.then(res => {
const userResponse = res.data
setTimeout(() =>
this.setState({user: userResponse.user}), 1000);
})
}
render () {
const {user} = this.state
const roles = user.user.roles.map((rol) => rol.roleName)
if (user.fullName === undefined)
return React.createElement("div", null, 'loading..');
return React.createElement("a", {className: "dropdown-item" }, user.fullName);
}
}
ReactDOM.render( React.createElement(Roles, {}, null), document.getElementById('dropdownRol') );
I would like to be able to manage different components(rendering each one) with data of the same axios response.
Is this possible considering my limitations?
Thanks in advance

Here's a working example of how you might do it. I've tried to annotate everything with comments, but I'm happy to try to clarify if you have questions.
// Fake response object for the store's "load" request
const fakeResponse = {
user: {
fullName: "Carolina Ponce",
roles: [
{ roleName: "administrator" },
{ roleName: "editor" },
{ roleName: "moderator" },
{ roleName: "generally awesome person" }
]
}
};
// this class is responsible for loading the data
// and making it available to other components.
// we'll create a singleton for this example, but
// it might make sense to have more than one instance
// for other use cases.
class UserStore {
constructor() {
// kick off the data load upon instantiation
this.load();
}
// statically available singleton instance.
// not accessed outside the UserStore class itself
static instance = new this();
// UserStore.connect creates a higher-order component
// that provides a 'store' prop and automatically updates
// the connected component when the store changes. in this
// example the only change occurs when the data loads, but
// it could be extended for other uses.
static connect = function(Component) {
// get the UserStore instance to pass as a prop
const store = this.instance;
// return a new higher-order component that wraps the connected one.
return class Connected extends React.Component {
// when the store changes just force a re-render of the component
onStoreChange = () => this.forceUpdate();
// listen for store changes on mount
componentWillMount = () => store.listen(this.onStoreChange);
// stop listening for store changes when we unmount
componentWillUnmount = () => store.unlisten(this.onStoreChange);
render() {
// render the connected component with an additional 'store' prop
return React.createElement(Component, { store });
}
};
};
// The following listen, unlisten, and onChange methods would
// normally be achieved by having UserStore extend EventEmitter
// instead of re-inventing it, but I wasn't sure whether EventEmitter
// would be available to you given your build restrictions.
// Adds a listener function to be invoked when the store changes.
// Called by componentWillMount for connected components so they
// get updated when data loads, etc.
// The store just keeps a simple array of listener functions. This
// method creates the array if it doesn't already exist, and
// adds the new function (fn) to the array.
listen = fn => (this.listeners = [...(this.listeners || []), fn]);
// Remove a listener; the inverse of listen.
// Invoked by componentWillUnmount to disconnect from the store and
// stop receiving change notifications. We don't want to attempt to
// update unmounted components.
unlisten = fn => {
// get this.listeners
const { listeners = [] } = this;
// delete the specified function from the array.
// array.splice modifies the original array so we don't
// need to reassign it to this.listeners or anything.
listeners.splice(listeners.indexOf(fn), 1);
};
// Invoke all the listener functions when the store changes.
// (onChange is invoked by the load method below)
onChange = () => (this.listeners || []).forEach(fn => fn());
// do whatever data loading you need to do here, then
// invoke this.onChange to update connected components.
async load() {
// the loading and loaded fields aren't used by the connected
// components in this example. just including them as food
// for thought. components could rely on these explicit fields
// for store status instead of pivoting on the presence of the
// data.user object, which is what the User and Role components
// are doing (below) in this example.
this.loaded = false;
this.loading = true;
try {
// faking the data request. wait two seconds and return our
// hard-coded data from above.
// (Replace this with your network fetch.)
this.data = await new Promise(fulfill =>
setTimeout(() => fulfill(fakeResponse), 2000)
);
// update the loading/loaded status fields
this.loaded = true;
this.loading = false;
// call onChange to trigger component updates.
this.onChange();
} catch (e) {
// If something blows up during the network request,
// make the error available to connected components
// as store.error so they can display an error message
// or a retry button or whatever.
this.error = e;
}
}
}
// With all the loading logic in the store, we can
// use a much simpler function component to render
// the user's name.
// (This component gets connected to the store in the
// React.createElement call below.)
function User({ store }) {
const { data: { user } = {} } = store || {};
return React.createElement(
"span",
{ className: "mr-2 d-none d-lg-inline text-gray-600 small" },
user ? user.fullName : "loading (User)…"
);
}
ReactDOM.render(
// Connect the User component to the store via UserStore.connect(User)
React.createElement(UserStore.connect(User), {}, null),
document.getElementById("userDropdown")
);
// Again, with all the data loading in the store, we can
// use a much simpler functional component to render the
// roles. (You may still need a class if you need it to do
// other stuff, but this is all we need for this example.)
function Roles({ store }) {
// get the info from the store prop
const { data: { user } = {}, loaded, loading, error } = store || {};
// handle store errors
if (error) {
return React.createElement("div", null, "oh noes!");
}
// store not loaded yet?
if (!loaded || loading) {
return React.createElement("div", null, "loading (Roles)…");
}
// if we made it this far, we have user data. do your thing.
const roles = user.roles.map(rol => rol.roleName);
return React.createElement(
"a",
{ className: "dropdown-item" },
roles.join(", ")
);
}
ReactDOM.render(
// connect the Roles component to the store like before
React.createElement(UserStore.connect(Roles), {}, null),
document.getElementById("dropdownRol")
);
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react/16.6.3/umd/react.production.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/react-dom/16.6.3/umd/react-dom.production.min.js"></script>
<div id="userDropdown"></div>
<div id="dropdownRol"></div>

How to fire an event on Vue switch change

I have a Vue component that has a vue-switch element. When the component is loaded, the switch has to be set to ON or OFF depending on the data. This is currently happening within the 'mounted()' method. Then, when the switch is toggled, it needs to make an API call that will tell the database the new state. This is currently happening in the 'watch' method.
The problem is that because I am 'watching' the switch, the API call runs when the data gets set on mount. So if it's set to ON and you navigate to the component, the mounted() method sets the switch to ON but it ALSO calls the toggle API method which turns it off. Therefore the view says it's on but the data says it's off.
I have tried to change the API event so that it happens on a click method, but this doesn't work as it doesn't recognize a click and the function never runs.
How do I make it so that the API call is only made when the switch is clicked?
HTML
<switcher size="lg" color="green" open-name="ON" close-name="OFF" v-model="toggle"></switcher>
VUE
data: function() {
return {
toggle: false,
noAvailalableMonitoring: false
}
},
computed: {
report() { return this.$store.getters.currentReport },
isBeingMonitored() { return this.$store.getters.isBeingMonitored },
availableMonitoring() { return this.$store.getters.checkAvailableMonitoring }
},
mounted() {
this.toggle = this.isBeingMonitored;
},
watch: {
toggle: function() {
if(this.availableMonitoring) {
let dto = {
reportToken: this.report.reportToken,
version: this.report.version
}
this.$store.dispatch('TOGGLE_MONITORING', dto).then(response => {
}, error => {
console.log("Failed.")
})
} else {
this.toggle = false;
this.noAvailalableMonitoring = true;
}
}
}

I would recommend using a 2-way computed property for your model (Vue 2).
Attempted to update code here, but obvs not tested without your Vuex setup.
For reference, please see Two-Way Computed Property
data: function(){
return {
noAvailableMonitoring: false
}
},
computed: {
report() { return this.$store.getters.currentReport },
isBeingMonitored() { return this.$store.getters.isBeingMonitored },
availableMonitoring() { return this.$store.getters.checkAvailableMonitoring },
toggle: {
get() {
return this.$store.getters.getToggle;
},
set() {
if(this.availableMonitoring) {
let dto = {
reportToken: this.report.reportToken,
version: this.report.version
}
this.$store.dispatch('TOGGLE_MONITORING', dto).then(response => {
}, error => {
console.log("Failed.")
});
} else {
this.$store.commit('setToggle', false);
this.noAvailableMonitoring = true;
}
}
}
}

Instead of having a watch, create a new computed named clickToggle. Its get function returns toggle, its set function does what you're doing in your watch (as well as, ultimately, setting toggle). Your mounted can adjust toggle with impunity. Only changes to clickToggle will do the other stuff.

Unsubscribe from Redux store when condition is true?

I'm employing the suggestion from #gaearon to setup a listener on my redux store. I'm using this format:
function observeStore(store, select, onChange) {
let currentState;
if (!Function.prototype.isPrototypeOf(select)) {
select = (state) => state;
}
function handleChange() {
let nextState = select(store.getState());
if (nextState !== currentState) {
currentState = nextState;
onChange(currentState);
}
}
let unsubscribe = store.subscribe(handleChange);
handleChange();
return unsubscribe;
}
I'm using this in an onEnter handler for a react-router route:
Entity.onEnter = function makeFetchEntity(store) {
return function fetchEntity(nextState, replace, callback) {
const disposeRouteHandler = observeStore(store, null, (state) => {
const conditions = [
isLoaded(state.thing1),
isLoaded(state.thing2),
isLoaded(state.thing3),
];
if (conditions.every((test) => !!test) {
callback(); // allow react-router to complete routing
// I'm done: how do I dispose the store subscription???
}
});
store.dispatch(
entities.getOrCreate({
entitiesState: store.getState().entities,
nextState,
})
);
};
};
Basically this helps gate the progression of the router while actions are finishing dispatching (async).
My problem is that I can't figure out where to call disposeRouteHandler(). If I call it right after the definition, my onChange function never gets a chance to do it's thing, and I can't put it inside the onChange function because it's not defined yet.
Appears to me to be a chicken-egg problem. Would really appreciate any help/guidance/insight.

How about:
Entity.onEnter = function makeFetchEntity(store) {
return function fetchEntity(nextState, replace, callback) {
let shouldDispose = false;
const disposeRouteHandler = observeStore(store, null, (state) => {
const conditions = [
isLoaded(state.thing1),
isLoaded(state.thing2),
isLoaded(state.thing3),
];
if (conditions.every((test) => !!test) {
callback(); // allow react-router to complete routing
if (disposeRouteHandler) {
disposeRouteHandler();
} else {
shouldDispose = true;
}
}
});
if (shouldDispose) {
disposeRouteHandler();
}
store.dispatch(
entities.getOrCreate({
entitiesState: store.getState().entities,
nextState,
})
);
};
};
Even though using the observable pattern leads to some buy-in, you can work around any difficulties with normal js code. Alternatively you can modify your observable to suit your needs better.
For instance:
function observeStore(store, select, onChange) {
let currentState, unsubscribe;
if (!Function.prototype.isPrototypeOf(select)) {
select = (state) => state;
}
function handleChange() {
let nextState = select(store.getState());
if (nextState !== currentState) {
currentState = nextState;
onChange(currentState, unsubscribe);
}
}
unsubscribe = store.subscribe(handleChange);
handleChange();
return unsubscribe;
}
and
Entity.onEnter = function makeFetchEntity(store) {
return function fetchEntity(nextState, replace, callback) {
const disposeRouteHandler = observeStore(store, null, (state, disposeRouteHandler) => {
const conditions = [
isLoaded(state.thing1),
isLoaded(state.thing2),
isLoaded(state.thing3),
];
if (conditions.every((test) => !!test) {
callback(); // allow react-router to complete routing
disposeRouteHandler();
}
}
store.dispatch(
entities.getOrCreate({
entitiesState: store.getState().entities,
nextState,
})
);
};
};
It does add a strange argument to onChange but it's just one of many ways to do it.
The core problem is that handleChange gets called synchronously immediately when nothing has changed yet and asynchronously later. It's known as Zalgo.

Inspired by the suggestion from #DDS, I came up with the following alteration to the other pattern mentioned in #gaearon's comment:
export function toObservable(store) {
return {
subscribe({ onNext }) {
let dispose = this.dispose = store.subscribe(() => {
onNext.bind(this)(store.getState())
});
onNext.bind(this)(store.getState());
return { dispose };
},
dispose: function() {},
}
}
This allows me to invoke like:
Entity.onEnter = function makeFetchEntity(store) {
return function fetchEntity(nextState, replace, callback) {
toObservable(store).subscribe({
onNext: function onNext(state) {
const conditions = [/* many conditions */];
if (conditions.every((test) => !!test) {
callback(); // allow react-router to complete routing
this.dispose(); // remove the store subscription
}
},
});
store.dispatch(/* action */);
};
};
The key difference is that I'm passing a regular function in for onNext so as not to interfere with my bind(this) in toObservable; I couldn't figure out how to force the binding to use the context I wanted.
This solution avoids
add[ing] a strange argument to onChange
... and in my opinion also conveys a bit more intent: this.dispose() is called from within onNext, so it kinda reads like onNext.dispose(), which is exactly what I want to do.

Pass data to React component with kefirjs

I am new in ReactJS and "reactive programming". I tried to create a dispatcher, action and store according to this project, but I don't know how to pass data to component.
In this example it doesn't work.
var data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5];
var AppDispatcher = Kefir.emitter();
function DataActions() {
this.getAllData = function () {
AppDispatcher.emit({
actionType: "GET_ALL"
});
};
}
var Actions = new DataActions();
var getAllDataActionsStream = AppDispatcher.filter(function (action) {
return action.actionType === "GET_ALL";
}).map(function (action) {
return function (data) {
return data;
};
});
var dataStream = Kefir.merge([getAllDataActionsStream]).scan(function (prevData, modificationFunc) {
return modificationFunc(prevData);
}, {});
var Content = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
this.onDataChange = this.onDataChange.bind(this);
return {componentData: []};
},
componentDidMount: function() {
dataStream.onValue(this.onDataChange);
},
componentWillMount: function(){
dataStream.offValue(this.onDataChange);
console.log(Actions.getAllData());
},
onDataChange(newData) {
this.setState({componentData: newData});
},
render: function() {
console.log(this.state);
var list = this.state.componentData.map(function (item, i) {
return (
<li key={i}>{item}</li>
);
});
return <ul>{list}</ul>;
}
});
React.render(<Content />, document.getElementById('container'));

Before I begin to answer in length I want to answer this part up front:
but I don't know how to pass data to component.
In the example you linked the author passes in the Todos into the main component using React's props, not with an action. So that is the approach I take in my example as well.
Now here is my example. I highly reccommend looking at the example and reading along to what I've written below.
var data = [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ];
// This will now log all events of the AppDispatcher in the console with the prefix 'Kefer: '
var AppDispatcher = Kefir.emitter().log("Kefir: ");
function DataActions() {
// Our application has an action of emitting a random number.
this.emitNumber = function() {
AppDispatcher.emit({
actionType: "EMIT_NUMBER"
})
};
}
var Actions = new DataActions();
var emitNumberActionStream = AppDispatcher
.filter(function(action) {
return action.actionType === "EMIT_NUMBER";
})
.map(function(action) {
console.log("EMIT_NUMBER ACTION OCCURRED!!");
return Math.floor(Math.random() * (10)) + 1;
});
// Only one stream, no need to merge right now.
//var dataStream = Kefir.merge([ getAllDataActionsStream ]);
var Content = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
// Set initial componentData using the data passed into this component's via props
return { componentData: this.props.data };
},
componentDidMount: function() {
// On each emitted value run the this.onDataChange function
emitNumberActionStream.onValue(this.onDataChange);
// Every second emit a number using the Actions we created earlier
setInterval(function() {
Actions.emitNumber();
}, 1000);
},
onDataChange: function(emittedNumber) {
console.log('state on change:', this.state);
// Update the state by appending the emitted number to the current state's componentData
this.setState({ componentData: this.state.componentData.concat([emittedNumber])});
console.log('updated state: ', this.state);
console.log('-----------------');
},
render: function() {
console.log('RENDER AGAIN!');
var list = this.state.componentData.map(function(item, i) {
return (
<li key={i}>{item}</li>
);
});
return <ul>{list}</ul>;
}
})
;
// Pass in initial data using props 'data={data}'
React.render(<Content data={data}/>, document.getElementById('container'));
I modified the example you gave that wasn't working so that it works and makes a little more sense (hopefully).
The Actions and Stores work like this:
Actions:
Request a number be emitted
Stores
Listen for "EMIT_NUMBER" actions and emit a random number
And the actual component runs like this:
It gets the initial 5 numbers passed into the component via props.
Once mounted it begins listening to the store and creates a setInterval that calls the action dispatcher's emitNumber() action. The interval is to show the reactivity at work, you could imagine that there was a button to press that would call emitNumber() instead.
The store observes the action dispatcher emit "EMIT_NUMBER" and emits a number.
The component observes the store emitted a number and updates the component's state.
The component observes that its state has changed and it rerenders.

I believe the issue is that you're using ES6 syntax (which is what the example was written in... notice the Readme). You'll need to either use a transpiler like Babel or convert your method(param => console.log(param)) syntax into normal JS (ie, method(function(param) { console.log(param) });).